How to Save Our Shores From Floods

-
A More Viable Seawall

A new type of cheap retaining wall or dam has been invented that could be used also as a levy when the waters rise. There are only four types of bridges they have been able to build in all of science, The Beam, it's a post across the river (or a road if you're our famous courier named Theresa, Joyce or Tammy). The Truss which is supported from the sides to the center, The Arch, and the Suspension Bridge. While the suspension bridge is a sort of arch upside down, the biggest bridges are all suspension bridges because this is the most strong, but interestingly enough while there are lots of arch dams and dams of other types, other than inflatable dams, there were no dams based on suspension (preacher's say we may all be in suspension above heck's damnation!) Like the suspension bridge, suspension dams may be of worth because of the large amount of lift they support per unit of structural material used to make the machine.

Before Hurricane Katrina hit many like me tried to think of a way to make a good seawall like an inflatable wall that would be affordable and strong to save New Orleans from the risk of storms. Innovators thought of an inflatable wall, but couldn't figure out how to anchor it securely so none of the water would leak through. The problem, with an inflatable wall like an inflatable dam, is that if it leaks, it has twice as much that can go wrong, because it can both leak water and air. This idea was improved by making it just a strong cover of material to hold the water held up on both sides by a strong wire or hawser the wire connects to via support beams like the towers of a suspension bridge, these are of a special type that have heavy weights on the side to the water the towers lean toward also so they use gravity when pulled upward to help make the wall strong against the incoming waves. The side near the land is dug in deep for support with a deep post at the same angle as the tower which is angled away from the land, so the gravity of the weights and the foundation of the posts gives them the strength needed to withstand high waters if needed but at a lower cost of materials like the suspension bridge. To build the wall or dam the towers would be rolled to the site and the cover of the dam put over the heavy line between the towers, the sheet would be stretched to a small waterproof wall closer to the water it would be attached to with such as clamps or stones on top with the sheet stretched farther seaward with more rocks or concrete ect., to secure the foundation if the most watertightness is needed, like for high dams inland. The lower waterproof seawall is important because it would be easier to see if it leaked because it's much smaller than a giant dam, saving lots of materials and labor but reliable enough to be viable.

---
To find out if it's worthy two walls would first be built, a few feet apart parallel to the shore, if it turns out there are almost no leaks the walls built in later times would just have one wall. Small scale (a few feet high) suspension walls of this sort could be tested in wave tanks.

This would be a good safety dam sort of like a safety net so the web could be made much higher, faster and cheaper than the Mars Jars! (Faster, Better...Was the NASA slogan). To build a dam the hawser would be stretched from two strong anchors on both sides, then the dam stretched over it then the tarp would be secured. Dams of this sort could be used in flooding sides of rivers in place of sandbags fast if the low waterproof walls near the waves along the shore to be protected were built and well proven to be anchored and watertight. Digging would be easier with seawalls because there aren't alot of optic fiber wires, propane, and clumps of grass and other unpredictable stuff the water would go through like on river banks, causing leaks without more caution. Seawalls may also be much improved by the floating wave barriers that have been devised that break the waves before they hit, anchored to the seafloor by standard sea anchors farther out in the ocean. The covers could be reinforced with strong wires made of carbon fibers like fullerenes or proton wires fibers made of much stronger density of the strong force, held together by the poles of each proton and without ionization even if of protons by a tube of electrons around the proton core, a sort of continuous atom which would have more strength in tension than any other electromagneticaly bound solid except because of the strong force compression of the field of each pole of the protons. If the wave cancelling barriers were not completely efficient, even if the towers are anchored by both gravity and beveled, the oscillation of the wave motion may make the towers work loose. With these super strong solids, lightweight plates could be made instead of the tarps held by the lines, these would be more stable and easier to put up. They lean toward land, and the towers supporting the shields beveled away from it, with the weights on the side of the towers away from land to add stability, and the wave barriers out to sea would cancel most of the wave motion.

---

Why Creativity is Good for You

.
THE WORTH OF CREATIVITY IN LIFE

Creativity is good for you! Many studies find that creativity such as watching comics is good for body and mind. There are many realms where I got this idea from edits of soundbites, I would play a tune slow and make a few goofs with improvisations, and listen on the tape to both the good and bad. Then when I speeded it up (chipmunk power!) by accident it sounded more professional. My conclusion was "good" randomness that violates no rule is a good basic (entry level and higher) way to win. The higher speed of the cassette made it so the small goofs were stopped while allowing all the good sounds. This would be why they say 4 out of 5 people like sped up speech more than slow, like in business promotions on the box.

And when I would compete with a chess machine in other realms it would compute with consideration when power was the same, but later if it was winning, it wouldn't take much labor, because it would seem all moves it would make would win (Or so it thought! I'll win a rug in the Euro Hoosier Mega VIS in 1997 eventually!). Then I got wiser because when the pieces were reset, after this with each go round of play I would win by moving a piece to an interstice of the defense, then on the next move I would move it deeper in with this motif, adding a bit of random motion inside the competition's lines, then following in with more moves in the trail blazed by the first (medium value so strong enough to win but not so strong it was a risk if the piece was lost) and better creativity yet. Because the machine couldn't move it's own pieces well inside its own line of defenses, this acted as a sort of trap and was then in my favor because with no place of the machine to move the helpless higher value pieces, I would win, just by moving any move. This motif I called a point advance (the point is where the piece lodges in the interstice) is a miniature of the competition as I said above about the machine moving any which way if it has the advantage at the end of the competition. In authorship 007 I was always taught to learn the rules before I would learn how to be creative within them. And in all four of these events, with music, the general competition, the point advance and the authorship, first is the setup that is without error and then the unusual moves, this is why creativity is important, because this type of motif is so common in what's most brilliant in life.
.

How to www. An Earthbound Asteroid For Mining!

Stars and Comets May Have Trillions Worth Of Water for Rocket Fuel, Air, and Cozy Mud Baths!

Fighting an earth impact asteroid with another smaller asteroid captured in earth orbit is considered on the SPACE.com page to be a possible way to defend the earth, Click Here.. (The problem is not capturing the small asteroid but hitting the incoming one, and all the small pieces would perhaps hit us). As I say Here I think asteroids could be made to not expand outward in chunks if impacted by use of a web of lightweight proton wires, protons held in high strength by their alternation of N and S poles stronger than all other chemically or magnetically melded materials because of the lines of compression of the fields via the strong force of the protons. The idea of the proton wire net to hold the asteroid in one piece could be used to make it so the asteroid blast plan would be viable or the other plan on the link about stopping the asteroid with a smaller stone. The net would be thrown over both asteroids and tightened. If the big block were then blasted or impacted with the small asteroid to move it rapidly out of the earth's path, the radioactive rocks or other rocks from the other type of impact inside the web wouldn't hit us. The proton wires would be stronger than other types of materials already known to stop a blast, e.g. concrete, but much lighter in weight and cheaper.

.
. While this plan would have the advantage of rapid deployment in case we were with not much advanced warning, my belief is that the most viable way to defend against asteroids would be to just gently nudge it sidewise with laser or other beams, perhaps capturing the asteroid in earth orbit so we can mine it for useful materials. There are actually 40 block sized masses per day that go between the earth and moon, and the water and other stuff of many of them would be of worth to capture in permanent earth or moon orbit because just the small lake of ice they found on the moon is worth trillions in hydrogen and oxygen for rocket power boosts, air, and water.

The use of a beam to move the asteroid in earth or lunar orbit is of worth for two reasons; because of all the room, Scientific American says most of the time we would get plenty of advanced warning if an asteroid was going to hit us eventually, going around perhaps 1000 times, so the beam could be used with more ease each time the asteroid zoomed nearer us. The earth is a small target within so much room. And of it would be like a Rolling Stones tour with lower cost! Worth Mich to the rich! The other reason is there would be no risk of any fallout by this more gradual motif of solution.
..
.

COMEDY VIII.
..
I found out many soap operas are filmed in Miami Beach, this is why they talk real slow in the south!

I like my herbs Veggies For Life. They're so cheap, I save. At this price my life may last many more months-or 1200!

How to save a lot, I just put a wet washrag on my face to sooth and relax my face and make my web visit to Miami Beach!

Did you know cows when played classical Mozart music in Europe milked higher in FlavORich than cheeze? When they tune up the milk truck, more than 55 horns and 76 violins of renoun in concert were herd!

My neighbor says she calls em as she sees em. She has a Mp3 with Hitachi!
.

Did you know? China Telecom has put a cell tower on the higher mountains in the world. When you type in you hear echos of big busy signals!

What's the worst place to buy perscriptions, in a consignment shop-or second hand!

It's been said there is no bad that does no bring good. Dandruff? It will always be a winter wonderland all month!

They've found talking on a cell bell when asleep causes insomnia, how so? If when talking my sleep I would say "Ma Bell hugs us with a sleeping cushion filled with cash, thanks for the price war!" seems like a more cushy solution.
~~~

What's good about shopping where I live is we can finally walk through Walls-Marts at the moment we are in the store!

MORE COMIC/CULTURAL LINKS

As you see on this site from the top of the web list (click here) the idea of quantum computing still has the major problem of decoherence; while they can change the bits to read the memory, the bit is changed so much by reading the information to retrieve it the memory stored is lost. So even at present with all the hoo ha about this type of machine, it's more who than hurrah, and unproven science, it's of worth except it's presently unviable!
.
In usual chips there is just an on off of the transistor and is considered to be optimal because it's simple, so base 2 with just the on and off is how most computers are made. It's considered more economical, but it's only because of the way chips are made. With more ways to move, say a continuous circle ("pick a number, pick 100 if you like", you'll always win at 21!") with a higher number of optimals than just on and off, you could store higher amounts of information.
.
Hardware that uses how an atom can rotate continuously in space with changes in applied voltage has been invented, a wire made of two types of alternating atoms; the sensor atoms, and the atoms that continuously rotate to store precious memories of the beach and the heat. A second set of wires intersect with each sensor atom to read them. In the patent the sensor atoms are unlike the bit atoms because to be readable the bits have to be more easy to change, and if so the information stored could be deleted if the atoms were moved by the voltage going through to also read them. The voltage going through the sensor atoms themselves is of low enough power so they leave the atoms with the stored data unchanged, just passing near enough to sense what is encoded in the position of the 360 degree coordinate of the alternating storage atoms beside them. To see that this is possible think of a sofa and the tiny beam of light that you see it by, not much changing the sofa. The idea is to make use of this small change to read the data and the continuous rotation of atoms to store much more data with each atom. this is sort of like a wrench that has both a continuous gear that opens and closes the clamp on the bolt and a second component that locks the wrench in place once it's adjusted. By way of the continual rotation and the lock, the information of thed general position of the wrench can then be read by a bolt without risk of the wrench losing grip, the risk of the decoherence would be like the loss of clamp without the lock on the wrench. The inertia and mass of the nonsensor atom is actually more than one atom for inertia so it resists the more slight motion of the sensor atom to read the position of the nonsensor atom(s) so it's nonvolatile and readable too by the optimal inertia or friction to store the bits so it both changes and stores the change too. They've thought of this idea with electrons where each angle of the electrons spin would be a bit, but atoms like the sofa are more continuous so with continuous applied voltage, instead of just having perhaps four bits of the electrons, or just two bits, you have 50 or 100 or even 50,000 for a chip with each bit in turn the size of an atomic element or small molecule (or even protons welded via the alternation of the N and S pole of each so much smaller and faster, by Chin's tunneling experiments here's my own Faster Than Light page about my belief about Chin's experiments) and because atoms or molecules are more continuous than electrons, this could be like with radio stations where they add more bandwidth to stations by compression so there are three hundred stations instead of just 20 on the radio. It might seem there are just two electric charges, + and - there are just two bits involved. But there are actually billions of possible TV stations. The electromagnetic field of light is actually a continnum. Because spacetime and voltage is continuous like the wavelength of light in relativity there may eventually be 50,000 bits possible. The speed of light is quantisized and solid, but the wavelength is continuous, because to conserve energy, when part of the field becomes more solid, some other nearby component must be more flowing, if we find these continuous components and good ways to control and measure them, computation wins for us all and you and me, even that 57th grade marm in college!
.
By making the reading and writing method of the optimal sensitivity by changing the elements just so, a computer like this would read and write at the same time at higher speed than even me, like that described in Popular Science in the August 1999 issue, by way of science called magnetic random access memory or "ma-gram", and grand-ma may well appreciate it! Grand-ma would replace not just the RAM but also other media of computers. Magram uses small wires with N S poles and their own sensor, this goes at 90 degrees so it stores the bit read by the sensors, but it's just base two. PM says it could be far faster than hard drives. Using just atoms instead of small magnets would allow much higher speeds because they would be smaller. Once the "store" atoms are at the angle to store the data, the angle is stored (saved) by making the field go from more fluid to solid by changes of the voltage, ect, in a rapid phase change, sort of like from fluid to solid somewhat. This or just the inertia of the nonsensor saves the information so when the machine is off no power is needed to restart. By reading the data from the sensor wires, the bits are intact even if the voltage of the main wire is unchanged because the voltage to read the sensors is lower than the voltage needed to change the main wires.
.
Another related invention that has been devised is just using changes in voltage or wavelength that are changed and retained and read by way of sensors. Since this type of change like the rotation of the atoms is continuous, non quantum, and readable, here too information can be stored.
.
This would make it so if you had the same number of atoms to make a 50 G hard drive if it was atomic, with each atom storing 50 times as much data, the same memory chip would be 2500 Gs, nonvolatile, cheaper than conventional RAM, much higher in speed, and with lower power consumption and heat loss.

On sites like the Wikipedia Timeline of Quantum Computing
you see all this progress in quantum computing NEW! IMPROVED! but without the problem of coherence solved, progress may need to continue indefinitely of this sort. If quantum computing is so great, why are so many advances being made in other fields like soap opera editing computers or weather control ? While it may be of worth eventually, by using a low power sensor and the non sensor bits, coherence is solved by a much simpler motif, and no complex nonlinear codes are needed to read it, base 25 or base 50 is simple math.
.