Old Fashioned Web Innovations

Maglev Trains That Charge Today's Tracks

Current Maglev Trains are 1 to $7 million per mile. A new method has been devised to save more than a boatload of cash to a floppy. In this plan the existing rails are charged by a process like heat treating to heat and cool the rails to charge more permanently for both maglevs and usual trains at 100s or 1000s per mile not millions, with no more real estate to buy than railroads already use. Like other tracks using permanent magnets now being built the inventor says this about just magnetizing the rails would take no power to move the train because the magnets are permanent not electromagnets like earlier maglevs, except this has the added advantage of use of the rails themselves to hold the field, not by adding many permanent magnets which would cost more. And when you walk out on the tracks with your watch you wear or other metal, and if on a slope you may levitate on the RR to sail to other counties 75 miles away! (This is a problem about other permanent magnet levitation trains too and some think it may be solved by laying down a large wire instead of magnets with magnets inside the wire and electric shields on the top of the wire that would automatically open and then close the field when the train goes over with the electric opening and closing of the wire powered by some of the weight of the train, the wire would be cheaper and easy to lay than many permanent magnets, the field wouldn't lose so much power-and no one would sail away!)

~~~
Auto Clean Walls. Have you heard about the automobile body coat that flows and smooths so the auto is healed like a can of Neverleak in 20 hours? Some chemical engineers say a good paint for rooms could be auto clean, no more room to paint, landladys like a site manager would be in the luxury sweet!

~~~

...

~~~

COMPUTERIZED FIRE FIGHTING~ of 2030 AD; A Fire Fighting Cyber Watchdog

~~~
They now have a hand grenade for fires, where you just toss it in the fire and it emits a potassium compound that cools the room from 1000 to 300 degrees in just 10 seconds. This is being extended by inventors to smart fire fighting devices. These may be UAV's (small airplanes or helicopters) that carry the compounds to stop the fire, and, as usual with the machines, they could climb up walls or columns and through air vents, over shelves and so on to reach the fire. The first cause of death of firefighters is the toxicology of the fire, the second cause is collisions of fire trucks with other vehicles on the way to save lives so the occupation of firefighting is actually about as dangerous as agriculture (second only to logging). Volunteer or more urban firefighters could rest more at ease if the machines did most of the job. In the more distant future innovators see the possibility of larger high speed aerial UAVs that would stand in for the fire trucks and perhaps arrive at the scene if powered by booster rockets in seconds or minutes not hours as sometimes is so now. When these machines arrived they would automatically turn on the hoses and hydrants, and even saw through doors and windows by cutting the glass and then imploding it not breaking it so the smaller machines could save lives more safely.

~~
The UAV's may eventually be larger and with high speed computerized reflexes to even carry water to forest fires much faster, safer, cheaper, and more efficiently than people could, with scanners to rapidly find the fire and save water more efficiently by finding where water or other compounds would do the most good. These machines may be most of worth in contrast to human fire fighters in high winds with high speed computer actuation of the airflow around the UAV, as well as used to more safely open windows and allow a more viable platform for the people in the hi rise to reach safe haven. (Props on the outside of the machine could create enough force to press against the wall to hold the machine steady so it would be just a step down to safety inside the machine from the window or other high place, and this could just be scaled up for rescuing larger numbers of people from even the side of the building like a high rise, and so on.) Another option may be the same actuation but with live persons on the ship, rather like how surgeons use computer actuation to make more precise cuts than they could if they've been drinking Bromo Seltzer again!

*****
For a personal super fire defender, one would be good, but four would be four times as good, alerting the people asleep or awake to be savvy ahead of time, stopping the fire fast before they start going into the fire to stop it where others can't go and perhaps blasting out a path where the people indoors can walk through to safety, sort of like Moses and the Blue Sea of waves, but with a path of more salvation than the heat.

....

Earth Spin Motor 365 and 1/4/24/7/4/30...A Space Elevator That's Economically Viable/Visas By The Lift

~~~
As I say on this site (search at top left of site) electric bubbles/loops may make a good way to find power in orbit by a giant windmill powered by the heat of the sun to generate electricity, and wind electricity via a machine to send and recieve the loops near the Earth may be of worth to make beautious mostly unobtrusive giant wind machines near the land or ocean, for a giant sigh of relief for many about a beach ecology they've hoped to see. Another idea is to lasso the moon as in old silver westerns with a wire in orbit from the earth's poles to loop around magnets on the moon and collect the spin, a giant electric motor and if only with narrow loops of wire 500,000 miles around. Even so it may be easier to have the moon ploughing through the loops of field instead of the wires for converting part of the earth/moon's rotation to power that may be built here in the 2010s or so. To save power the loops may be focused in on the sides and so on. The loop may be concentrated in a magnetic beam like a laser or by attraction around the moon using the loop of the field and attracted around the moon by the moon magnets there to save more of the field. Like the solar powered windmill, part of the power of the solar field or the moon's magnets ploughing through the loops may be used to bend the field or the beam may be self focusing for more advantage, making it more viable perhaps for the machines like the moon motor to win much more power beyond that point. (E.g. "An increase of 1% in the field past balance would yield us a billion more volts.")

...

Another cheaper option is to move asteroids cheap by a simple nudge with a beam from the earth or closer up on a machine boosted higher. The same wires or beams to magnets or vice versa with these asteroids in orbit would be used to collect the power of the spin of these masses by boosting lightweight magnets into the sides of each in another giant electric motor. This would be cheaper than wiring up the moon because of much closer distance. Another option as others say is tethers from the asteroids spin outward to collect power from the earth's spin and magnetic field as the higher speed tethers plough through it. The small wires to the asteroid would be the cobwebs to wires of space elevator towers, starting with small robot elevators that would add or spray on more and more layers of strengthening metal with each trip while also paying for themselves with payloads to orbit, a sort of cosmic weigh in station. When the wires are strong enough to support the elevator with people we could reach Low Earth Orbit cheap and safe and colonizing the solar system would be much easier. By use of the pay by labor to reach orbit method, the major problem of the tower, money, would be solved, with a tether to lift payloads by using the spin of the asteroid for the lift if the asteroid were much nearer in than the more distant reach of an orbiting elevator held in orbit by its own centrifugal force, a lighter wire would be used, so much cheaper and easy to build than the older (20th-21st Century, Yawn!) elevator in orbit. More mass multiplies up the equation of centrifugal force so the much larger mass of the asteroid could be with the cheaper wire to a lower geostationary orbit.

****

The asteroid would make a good space station and source of materials. To stop terrorists it would have a net of strong mesh around it so if a bomb hit it would be like a bag of loose sand, but none of the rocks would go outward, so the whole machine would stay intact and spinning. And unlike a more expensive orbiting tower, if it went down because of the much cheaper cost of moving the asteroid and using cheap tethers for the lift of payloads instead of the elevator, it could be back online in weeks or months instead of taking 25 years to rebuild the elevator (in the older plans e.g. of Tsiolokovsky) at huge cost.

..

Two or three asteroids in Low Earth orbit would be a boom for many cities in the tropics, with more hours a day in the shade and it would be great for orbiting Pizza Shack business, the great pizza in the sky.

~~~
LADY In READ... Research shows the color red makes men think women are more attractive but did not alter how men rated the women in the photographs in terms of likeability, intelligence or kindness -- only attractiveness. They also saw she was wearing her volume of the web, the best read yellow zoom sites on htttp://www.com/!


Her 240V Boots, VISA Swimwear!



Air Guitar Hero

While this site about outfits mentions using radiation like light to clean them in 20 hours using special fibers, others think an electric boost by plugging in a moderately higher power current to all the fibers may clean them at higher speed than a day and it might also be a good way to a smoother look. A shirt that is pumped by air inside with no leaks has been used to iron the shirt in just seconds, not minutes like by usual irons.

Another innovation of the same site is using sensors around the wearer's elbows and hands to make air guitar sound real, with real as if in concert sound output, sort of like boxing via imagination except with music (cyber boxing where you imagine your action has been found to have real value to improve reflexes.).

There are now hand power machines that can be worn for soundsmiths to learn how to move well when they play the instrument, so they always learn well, an easy way to be a concert whiz. Your chances are 1 in 40,000 without them, so this may be more like a celebration than even labor day of mom all month!
~~~

Wave Powered Ships Surf's Up....

Wave powered boats! They've climbed all around the world and swam the 7 seas with machines like this that use no power other than the waves (although the boat was in a wave of splurge vendors for the ship of the 21st century!). There are also airplanes that wrap the shock wave around the ship to ride on the wave the airship produces to improve efficiency. Now wave powered ships and boats are being devised that likewise use fins on the outside of the twin hull fuselage of the ship to bend the otherwise outward flowing wave around nearer the ship and collecting more of the forward power of the ship with the fins. Meanwhile inside the two hulls, the wave the boat makes already is captured with fins so the boat rides foreward via more of the wave's energy. (A great surfer is a surfer who always finds a wave even when the waves are calm, well with this ship ya know.) It seems like wave radiation is like heating the outdoors with a flame compared to the wave for power, which is more like heating the indoors with sealed heat and vents. Light in wires like optic lines move foreward by adjusting the wavelength to fit the speed so the forces are minimized, and the wave with the same power ship goes farther.


Laser Surgery Via Antibiodies To Find and Remove Harmful Cells

"It's all gone." One of the myths of cancer treatment, is when they say this to the patient, In truth there's been no way to know if it's completely gone with microscopic tumors often still present. This is a problem with blood transfusion, it's basically a form of tissue transplant often with small cancer cells or viruses the donor's immune system may have stopped while the patient's own immune system is unable to defend because of the recipient's immune system being not well adapted to foreign tissue. A recent advance in health science is the laser knife, it uses 297 or more lasers without cutting the skin or the use of anasthesia to burn away the cancer even to the microscopic level in the body. Like a concert light show the lasers don't light up till when they meet and the light is seen "in concert" so they don't heat up much till they reach the target cells, so no incision or anesthesia is needed even through bone for brain surgery, and the typical inpatient stay is hours not months. This may be of worth to solve the problem of the microscopic cells by identifying even the individual cells by binding them with antibodies and sensing just these cells with illumination and then using the laser knife to not only stop the larger tumors but even to cure the patient by also stopping the other cells, even if while they move around in real time in the circulation. This use of the laser knife may not only be more efficient, it also may be much safer than conventional chemotherapy using far less radiation, and of worth in tissue transplants and other uses for health. To kill say a germ the entire germ wouldn't be burnt out even if with sharp definition. Rather just the DNA or holes would be zapped in the cell wall of the otherwise harmful cells, these is are well known ways to stop most germs and use less radiation yet and also there may be fewer toxic compounds left than by use of the gamma knife without more efficient illumination of this type.
~~~

If Viruses Reach The World Ecology, Two Solutions.

...How to Know If We'll Win The Race In Time and A Powerful New Defence Strategy Used In Health Science.....

As in our evolution with civilization it's now believed our evolution is speeding up because with more of us in history there are more combinations of genes and by retaining the genes of worth for our advantage we've adapted to many more realms, e.g. the far north of eskimos or the desert or even the urban jungle. This idea that number crunching allows higher speed evolution may be important to our future because it means with more people who have lethal viruses, the number of mutations to find more ways to adapt the viruses have may be increased like our higher speed evolution, so it's more common that deadly viruses may mutate to live in the water or air than in most of evolution. The bad news with more computing power like this it may be just a matter of time before this type of mutation is found. But there's good news too. A new mathematical formula has been devised by bioengineer Micheal Deem of Rice University for use in medicine to calculate how many times the virus must copy and mutate to overpower antiviral drugs. This may help researchers fine tune compounds early in the clinical development of new antiviral drugs. Because viruses are mostly simple, it's a simple formula to calculate, with just a few parameters found by lab research for the savvy about each virus. If the virus must copy 10, 20, or even 100 times to overpower the medicine and we're ahead of the virus in power we know the virus will lose and we'll win. "At this rate the virus won't have time to correct errors or absorb drug evading changes and it will crash." Other good news (if you're not a virus) is that new antiviral drugs being researched at many university labs use extra random DNA that's almost always lethal to the virus. This method, lethal mutagenesis is like throwing a wrench into the machinery that fools the virus into using bad DNA. Most random mutations are lethal and not harmful to other life. My addition here is the observation that the formulas may be used to calculate other problems the virus may try to solve too, like adapting to life in the water or air, so at any rate we'll know how much time we have left to solve the problem. If we're going to lose the race at least we'll know and be ready for the worst with more money for research for our best defence, and if we are going to win the marathon we'll know if the nations of the world are safe or just how much it might take to win, otherwise this may be a problem if we didn't have a way to know what's most optimal..
~~~.

Why Time Doesn't Slow Mostly Via Massive Fields...
..
Why Gravity is Implosion of Mass In General Relativity Not The Expansion With Redshift Like Einstein Believed..

Einstein held that mass and energy are the same, leading him to conclude that time is slowed with the redshift of both gravitational mass and high speed motion. You may say mass which is more solid and with angular motion, and energy with more linear motion are both conserved so they are indeed the same. But if they are exactly the same, we would have no way of knowing which was which. Thus I believe Relativity has room for more like the room of Mrs Einstein's coffee jug she filled with stars for Al each Omega 3 AM. If mass is spinning energy as I believe, then what's called General Relativity would actually be the opposite of Special Relativity, like waves and particles both can't be in the same place and time. A line that is linear is the opposite of an acceleration, a plenum is the opposite of empty space and has many complex causes otherwise unseen (space with a low energy field in my belief has some definite physics like Maxwell believed of it's own no doubt. Here's my PHYSICS SYNOPSES.). Time is always measured by periodic fluctuation and so it's much the same as mass because mass wraps around and is an acceleration. With more compression of the field and by conservation of angular momentum, if time is periodic fluctuation, more mass would speed up time overall. If Special Relativity is high speed linear energy that slows time (by stretching out the helix of each particle with more motion through the field by "friction"), mass is more angular, and Special Relativity and energy and more massive gravity or "mass" are the opposite. Therefore I believe that time would speed up not slow down with more gravitational mass as Einstein believed. Consider that gravity/earth could be likened to the Strong/ Weak force in subatomic physics. The Strong Force is only implosive like gravity and the Weak Force is like the electric field, a short range contact force with two charges like the + and - charges of electric power. Einstein's vision about time slowing around massive bodies I think would be like being at the outer flow of the proton's Strong Force flux and when you look inward and if you had clocks to fit the size of the mass of these distances you indeed would see that time is slower deeper in the field as it implodes with more force and acceleration stretching the field (and no worries whether the cosmos will fizzle out in a billion years!). From this near radius looking out you would likewise see the time of the outer radius to be faster, the flux of the waves are more or less with redshift with slower time (upstream seen looking inward sees slow clocks) or compression (downstream looking outward sees fast clocks). The waves oscillate, the periodic fluctuation measures time, and Einstein might have believed this was a complete formulation of how gravity and indeed the strong force slow time. Gravity and the strong force both are mostly attractive long range forces without much outward flow of the field and may be alike, and so too the Weak Force is much like electromagnetism, in the two great action reaction pairs of gravity and electromagnetism and the Strong Force with the Weak Force at subatomic distances.. The same general idea that gravity slows time or that time is fast with more distance outward would be Einstein's proof of General Relativity. Mass and energy would be not just equivalent, they would be equal. The problem is that Relativity would leave us no way to distinguish mass and energy, it's based on the likeness without saying why they are also unlike too.. If mass and energy are also the opposite because of a deeper truth that even if both would be about the general motion of fields being motion in quantity, with distinction in the way that mass and energy operate with options not seen in relativity, the physics may be more complete. Does time really slow in General Relativity? If you look at the strong force in subatomic physics there is important evidence that mass speeds up time. With mass increasing from lower mass subatomic particles like the muon and other mesons on up to the baryons the time before the radioactive decay is reduced. More mass has reduced time (with the exception of the proton which is perhaps completely stable for other reasons mostly about quanta. Click Here for why the proton's stability is caused by it having being the lowest energy baryon with the quantum numbers to flip, so the reaction would go slower or be completely stable for unrelated reasons than the general higher speed time with more hadronic mass.) So hundreds of subatomic mesons and baryons are proof that time speeds up, not slows down with more mass as in General Relativity. The reason would be the usual consideration of looking out in General Relativity to see the observer at higher elevation from low altitude or looking down to see the observer at lower elevation from above (in General Relativity lower elevation is above it would seem) like the observer inside the massive meson of subatomic physics only is considering the strong force or gravity like Relativity, not the overall work done and motion of the field of both the Strong and Weak Force or Gravity and Electromagnetism, so Relativity seems incomplete. The subatomic particles have reduced lifetime with more mass because the Strong Force flexes inward like gravity, and then flexes the force like the Weak Force, with expansion of the meson or hug jug of the fizz machine, just as more gravity causes the heat by flexing of the earth. Implosion of the field alone is not as important as the more general combination of inward and outward flow of the field. Gravity doesn't cause expansion with a redshift, in general it unifies mass, otherwise by Relativity the Earth would be inside out. Einstein's belief would also violate conservation of momentum because time is always measured in all of its forms by periodic fluctuation or in other words angular momentum. If time slows in gravitational fields in general all the mass would spin slower, so if you pile more mass on the earth or mars with a comet it would spin slower not faster, and this would be not disproof that acceleration changes as Einstein believed in general relativity. This is well established, not proof that gravity is relativistic. Even with redshift near the surface when you pile on mass, by conservation of angular momentum, the day is reduced in hours, and time is speeded up. Einstein's idea that relativity is proof of gravity would be disproven because mass and energy even if similar are in opposition and another logic applies to attractive forces than to the inertial forces like the speed of light in Special Relativity. If Relativity is incomplete, Faster Than Light motion might be possible or probable as I say on my PHYSICS SYNOPSES. The blueshift of gravity needed to disprove General Relativity would just be the force of gravity as it compresses matter plus more extra mass the field adds to its own implosion by the compression multiplying itself up a bit more as Einstein also believed. (He believed high mass density both multiplies up mass and that the redshift by inner expansion would lower it, in contradiction. One or the other would be true, but I believe it would be the one that disproves General Relativity.).

No doubt if so this must be fit into physics like the atomic clocks and GPS and I think this may be possible in the Mossbauer experiment by way of a smaller change. The much greater distance of the Mossbauer radiation in the tower than the smaller gravitational blueshift of this line of research would be because as mass and energy are unlike the greater distance of the field of energy being more springy and light may change wavelength more than the compression of the field of the mass of each particle.
..
The Coriolus effect and other effects like the weight of a ship moving west weighing more than a ship moving east were measured by sensitive machines of the early 20th century have been established, as well as the fact that a stone launched straight up falls first more to the west, then to the east, although not so much to the east as to the west. We might expect that if there's a force resisting the earth's eastward motion like this for the masses that make it up, gravity would be exerting a (more) equal but opposite force to the east to keep the earth in rotation. Einstein may have believed the Mossbauer redshift fit the Special Relativistic way of gravity. The compression of gravity as it moves mass together would be like the Fitzgerald Contraction and the redshift itself is the measured redshift of gravity. A relativity based explanation like this seems to lack the description of acceleration; nowhere in Special Relativity is the spin to the side described by like the 24 hours of the earth with more mass piled on if we could. There is no proof anywhere in Special Relativity of acceleration to the side of a high speed observer like the acceleration of gravity. If we measure this effect in the Mossbauer experiment, this small sideways change may be the proof that gravity is not relativistic. In his formulation of General Relativity, Einstein took the flat space of Special Relativity and hoped to fit it in to the curved space of the gravity, and hoped the acceleration somehow would be about relativity.. As I say, Einstein held the proof of the Relativity of gravity to be the constant acceleration of the equivalence principle where the masses "fall at the same rate" while at the same time using the opposite experiments of changes in the acceleration of gravity to prove it. The acceleration of Mercury, frame dragging, gravitational radiance, and so on are proofs for changes in acceleration, not a constant rate of fall of different masses near the Earth. So I believe there may thus be a small sideward change in the wavelength of light by the Mossbauer method not predicted by General Relativity based on the conservation of angular momentum. Like Einstein I believe a massive body would add mass over time by implosion of the field; the gravity wins out in the implosion reradiation of gravity versus the electromagnetic field to hold the field in one accord with energy conservation so here I think Relativity may fail because the small change in the redshift might also be increasing somewhat as it would add a bit of motion to the side of the tower at the inner radius more than higher up.
...
Some authors says they've proven that gravity speeds up time so all we have to do is send a cheap probe to the moon to prove it by way of a light signal from the Earth to the moon. A large electromagnetic effect by way of something like GPS or the Mossbauer has already been ruled out since Einstein was so amazing he invented the atomic clock and the laser even later when he was in another world! (the laser was invented in 1960..) Gravity is not the same as electromagnetism and the speed of light with relativity. Smaller effects here would be the disproof of Relativity. Gravity may speed up time at it's lower energy longer wavelength, while inertia may slow it less at the higher energy realm of the atomic clocks. Between the earth and moon there would be more redshift by stretching the field. Gravity might not increase the overall change in time much at the wavelengths of mass at shorter distances, just more overall than electromagnetism, and locally in truth gravity may seem to radiate inward as I say about the implosion of the heavy mote above.
..
There are other predictions than just Faster Than light in General Wave Dynamics, GWD has to distinguish it from General Relativity. If mass and energy aren't the same they would be in some violation of Relativity, so a hot iron would weigh less than a cool iron, not more with more energy as Einstein believed and so more mass and matter and antimatter might not fall at the same rate, and this may also explain why there is more matter than antimatter (one has more mass than energy and mass like gravity is more important than energy to physics). In truth the entire wave causology of light seems to be evidence against relativity being about acceleration. Einstein believed light is a particle in Special Relativity in order to explain the unchanging speed of light, as if the light had no interaction between observer and source (with a nonexistant field, Maxwell had used the assumption of to predict the speed of light exactly via) while he believed it to be both a wave and a particle in quantum physics to prove mass energy equivalence by way of energy conservation. Only if we believe in no waves is relativity possible.

..

Where's The Gravitational Blueshift?...

..

The above about the speed of gravity and the sideways change in the torque may be ways to improve relativity. We see that if you take two masses attached to an L shaped boom and toss them up in the air and they spin around a point in empty space, proof the field is there, not "empty" space time, not only is the field there changing the center of mass according to the masses, this is proof that the field of attraction holding the masses together is attractive; add more mass and the center of mass moves toward the heavy mass via the mass moments. Mass a times the distance to the center always = the smaller mass times more distance. The field is thus compressed with more mass so the momentum of the two masses is conserved when they spin around. More mass compresses the field. If we have a rope we held to two anchor points over the entire diameter of the earth and we have only gravitational redshift, the rope must expand, or the mass moments would make the distance between the masses increase. If instead the distance actually decreases, where is this blueshift of the field? As above, the relativistic reflection of the change of the lower energy gravitational field present even with the two spinning masses would be small or it would already have been found with the atomic clocks (as the other author says) with the possible exception of the Mossbauer change in the sidewise motion of the torque of the field. The gravitational blueshift would not be just a small change in the atomic clocks. It would be the force of the rope or wave contracting to bring masses together and holding us to the massive earth. If not and gravity were increased, a world's inner moons would spin slower, not faster with inner radius and more redshift.
..
To find the compression of the field, I believe it may be the gravity waves themselves at another wavelength and energy. The rope of the waves of the "electromagnetic" relativity with the speed of light being all important would be being constantly stretched by the flow of the much faster waves of the gravity, they would move faster in GWD so the "reflection" in GR of the wavelength of light would be changed as if by "spacetime". (You may say that in all of relativity, the speed of light is constant, in general I speak of changes of wavelength of light as "changes in the speed" of the light, and changes in wavelength are changes in motion with acceleration as Maxwell believed, thus the nonconstant speed of light in General Wave Dynamics). Only the illusion of spacetime is maintained however because the high speed of these waves would give the impression of instantaneous, and continuous spacetime. Indeed any motion of any kind in any direction relative to light is Faster Than Light. Relativity can't solve this by saying light has no mass, the bending of massive light by massive gravity is a hallmark of GR and research has shown that at high energy, light behaves like a heavy particle.. The gravity waves may contract and speed up like the moons of Jupiter where the light waves of GPS and atomic clocks would "slow down" to conserve momentum here too, because mass and energy in GWD are generally opposite, gravity tries to move masses inward, while the thermodynamic entropy of relativity and the speed of light would try to reradiate outward. Even so even though the light redshifts in GR in GWD there is more blueshift than redshift. In GWD gravity is more important and holds stars, the cosmos and comets together, so the amount of the blueshift would be more than the redshift of GR and so time indeed would speed up with more mass.

To prove or disprove we may use the experiments I describe and the use of the new IP that uses the dense shockwaves of the heavy particles, to both predictably emit and absorb gravity waves.
..

An Inclusive Insurance Policy is When Mom receives the business after being missed by a 10,000 altitude realtor's ad for The Shack in the heat at the beach while being paid for not watching TV if she's a musician!
..
..The Former Miss America 1998 Kate Shindle is in the lead female role in the musical "Jekyll & Hyde". She had been waiting tables at Artie's a diner at 82nd and Broadway but quit after landing the part in the chorus. She says the publicity about her waitressing job probably helped jumpstart her acting career.

..
Sounds like she's singing and dancing better and with better limelights than on a good silverware stage, sometimes contenental! ..

..

COMEDY X
..
I have real web safety! I have a password so safe even my memory can always find the web!
....
What's the greatest yarn ever written for sophomores about a cyber goddess? Unlimited Urn Access for Greeks!

.
Out in the country, the more music like rock and roll changes the more the banjo and violin stay famous!
..
Vanna is even smarter than a phd, she likes 26,000 fonts, and most are P-H-AND-D!
..
I saw this health aid today, it said this dish helped millions of people for thousands of years. Amazing. It must work well if they are so strong they all lived for thousands of years!
..
What is it when you have a watch in the vitamin store and it sails away? Time released!
..