One fascinating question is why when you have a bell jar and you can hear the bell but you pump the air out of it you can't hear it anymore. If there's anything there you should be able to hear it just fine right? Or you should be able to hear the roar of the sun.

But if you use a clapper of the bell that's either got ionization or magnetic polarity and then you send a mass past on the outside that's also ionized or magnetic it moves according to the change of the bell clapper.

When you turn off the ionization of the clapper or the external mass or both it moves past without any influence. To me this is evidence that there is mass induction but the main reason after so much search we don't find it usually would only be because almost all the massive bodies in the cosmos have zero electric charge overall and so like the clapper of the bell and the external magnet moving past, they don't show signs of the low energy field.

If we turn it off and on and it changes the path of the ionized mass outside of the belts are with no air in it than this is definite evidence that there's a field. By Einstein's own admission if the low energy field is found, relativity is disproven. My idea is since special relativity works so well it's not so much disproven as augmented by my ideas I call GWD General wave Dynamics.

For the connection to exist for the sound to send through the air inside of the bell jar to the outside, we say that each molecule connects to the next with a sort of short-range connection, but when we ionize the atoms and we then measure the connection, we're also measuring an internal change to the overall zero electric charge type of connection connection!

I thought of a new state of matter called a proton wire. We hope to take protons and move them together north, south, north south and the magnetic fields might hold them together even against the positive charge. I'd wondered how we might take electrons and a tube around these protons to neutralize electric charge so you don't have so much large positive charge you can't do anything with it. The proton wire would be super durable. It would also be lightweight if made into a composite. So overall it's super strong but super lightweight more than any other material.

While this was a theoretically possible way to improve material science I don't know if this would ever be viable because of stability issues like by cosmic rays coming in and destabilizing it. (Even so I had thought of surrounding it by heavy atoms or even sweeping lasers for some uses).

But the strong force is a short-range force and so only when you move it in closer, might the protons also have the strong force holding them together more. And perhaps even the magnetic fields will be so super stronger than any other material that they would also keep it from imploding and fusing.

Overall the strong force is mostly zero at longer range, just like the atoms of the bell clapper converting it to an antenna by ionization. So in a way the molecule has an atom but also when you ionize it and you separate the two charges you've made it into an atom of much larger size. If you're inside that radius of the atom then you can cause induction and the field is present and it's obvious it's real.

Unlike sound light doesn't fizzle out over long distance in the low energy field and this is held by relativists to be evidence that there's really nothing there and the light carries itself and it's an inertial frame.

Bertrand Russell in one of his books in a chapter entitled "What's Seen and What's Felt" discusses about how all around us forces that push and pull us are common and taken to be for granted but for the planets or stars or high-speed motion without much friction, vision becomes much more important like by special relativity because of the light.

What he's ignoring is that the forces that push and pull are real too and even while gravity bends all light the same and while this is taken as evidence for the foundation of relativity because that light bending is the same as space and time, so all masses fall at the same rate also. And so this must mean according to relativity that there just is no field there and it's not a real force.

But gravity has an extra tensor that relativity can't account for and while it works if you use a different amount of force to raise them, if you use the same amount of force applied to them, they fall at different rates. The moon falls at a different rate around the Moon Earth then the Earth around the Moon. Contrary to relativity for different masses, one is going to be more privileged than the other.

So while the idea of no force works for light, it really doesn't work for the forces that push and pull that distinguish masses and that are not about the vain appearances of light even though they're valuable for special relativity as far as they go.

  The light has no friction as it travels and this is taken as evidence that it's basic to space and time which it is for special relativity of course but also it's not complete because while light doesn't fizzle out over great distance if we would say that relativity is the foundation of everything then we would have to say by relativity there would be no friction for any machines and nothing would ever wear out or run down like the light.

If we have the clapper or source of the change in the field and then we send the light past on the other side or if you use another magnet with one on the clapper and one on the sensor outside the bell jar we can say that if we move the clapper and the sensor moves by way of observing the light only then this is all there is to it. 

 By relativity, this is perfect, there is no low energy field there because for the magnets to attract we would have to have the quanta of that magnet go over the Debrogle wavelength. As the air is pumped out of the bell jar, the sound reduces even while we can see the light emitted by the clapper well.

So relativity is perfect here. The light is the only way the signal from the clapper to the external magnet can be transmitted. The light changes only its wavelength and there is no quanta between them so no sound is transmitted. 

 But relativity isn't perfect because with the magnets you can also put iron filings between them and these will perfectly well show the changes in the field. 

 It might be said that there's nothing there between the iron filings, but this nothing is changing continuously as measured by the filings. 

 

 The problem here is that nothing equals zero and going from 0 to 0 gives zero and so the iron filings can't change by relativity.

 Light is bent the same for all wavelengths of the light in a gravitational field and so we could say that all light falls at the same rate. 

But this doesn't hold for masses like the Earth and the Moon. The heavier Mass falls slowly and the lighter Mass falls faster, as with f = ma.

  This can be easily explained by assuming that the heavier mass has more surface area in contact with the low energy field and so when force is applied it moves more slowly. 

 Relativity can't explain this because if you apply the same force to the heavier mass and the lighter mass one will rise higher and fall faster and the other will rise slower and fall slower. 

By relativity, since the two masses are the same vertically, when you apply the same force to the two masses horizontally, they should also move at the same rate.

This is contrary to Einstein's idea that all masses fall the same in the Earth field of mass because when you raise them to the same height with different force, you would have to not be distinguishing between the heavy mass and the light mass with that force.

 So it would seem by relativity that light masses and heavy masses are distinguishable while light of all energies falls at the same rate. 

We could say this is so by way of the Debrogle wavelength for the quanta like the different masses but not for the light.

 Einstein said that relativity is perfect and that on the one hand mass is on only distinguishable by way of this wavelength and all that matters is the relative motion of the masses because a different physics is involved for the light. 

 According to relativity we see changes in the bell jar clapper by way of the light but there's no sign of any matter between them transmitting the sound, yet this seems to be disproven by way of the iron filings. 

 By energy conservation and the uniformity of physics there needs to be something connecting between the light and the quanta of the bell jar even with the Debrogle influence. 

One possibility is that the dark matter on the cosmic scale bends light but not the heavy matter like the moon and the Earth anymore than by common physics, because the heavier matter the dark matter doesn't influence as much is obeying the Debrogle limit, but the light is also considerably distinguishable from the heavy quanta. 

 Dark matter itself may have a different physics perhaps from either common masses or the light. 

I believe this is possible because of Maxwell's comment where he says "Whatever the low energy field is about it can't be particulate because like a gas or we could weigh it and it would have weight."

So perhaps the low energy field interacts with usual mass like with pressure to cause f=ma and what we see with that dark matter by astronomy bending light is about how the dark matter itself is distinguished from either the light or the heavier masses or quanta.

 If it interacts with the heavy masses according to pressure on the outside and the interaction acts the same as f=ma and seems to have no extra change about this, so by Maxwell's belief on the astronomical scale at any rate, dark matter would have no chemical optical or mechanical properties because it's mostly wavelike.

 Even so, the light will have some distinction from the heavy quanta by way of the dark matter and this would bend the light while the heavy quanta might continue to act the same.

I believe another way of looking at this is that light being a boson spins at the speed of light all the way to the center of its field while the heavy quanta obeying the Debrogle limit must always move slower than light in linear motion because inside they spin at faster than light by a phase change. 

 In my belief mass is spinning energy even if sometimes this may also just be based on an abstraction of spin like isotopic spin or even the currents of the constants, so the much higher energy curve inside the electron would not be a simple linear pattern with change in radius always at c, but rather it could only be explained if inside the electron the spin is much faster than speed of light because the mass density and the speed of the spin is so much higher. 

Einstein's idea can't explain rest mass because if all the heavy quanta spin at the speed of light they would all have a mass of either plus or minus one because of the unified electric charge of plus or minus one instead of the rainbow of masses we see, and also for example, with relativity mass slows down time so the heavier the quanta the slower it should spin but instead the half-lives of the quanta are reduced with greater mass.

 This also could also be why we can't account for 97% of the proton's mass because the proton's dark energy field is spinning that much faster.

So if inside the heavy quanta like the proton or the electron the spin is faster than light the dark matter externally couldn't influence these quanta as much and only gives way by the f= ma relationship. The faster than light spin of the heavier quanta might act as a sort of anchor, so even while the dark matter field is interacting with it, it's not changing the heavier quanta or masses as much as the dark matter could influence the light on more cosmic scales and energy.