One fascinating question is why when you have a bell jar and you can hear the bell but you pump the air out of it you can't hear it anymore. If there's anything there you should be able to hear it just fine right? Or you should be able to hear the roar of the sun.

But if you use a clapper of the bell that's either got ionization or magnetic polarity and then you send a mass past on the outside that's also ionized or magnetic it moves according to the change of the bell clapper.

When you turn off the ionization of the clapper or the external mass or both it moves past without any influence. To me this is evidence that there is mass induction but the main reason after so much search we don't find it usually would only be because almost all the massive bodies in the cosmos have zero electric charge overall and so like the clapper of the bell and the external magnet moving past, they don't show signs of the low energy field.

If we turn it off and on and it changes the path of the ionized mass outside of the belts are with no air in it than this is definite evidence that there's a field. By Einstein's own admission if the low energy field is found, relativity is disproven. My idea is since special relativity works so well it's not so much disproven as augmented by my ideas I call GWD General wave Dynamics.

For the connection to exist for the sound to send through the air inside of the bell jar to the outside, we say that each molecule connects to the next with a sort of short-range connection, but when we ionize the atoms and we then measure the connection, we're also measuring an internal to that overall zero electric charge type of connection connection!

I thought of a new state of matter called a proton wire. We hope to take protons and move them together north, south, north south and the magnetic fields might hold them together even against the positive charge. I'd wondered how we might take electrons and a tube around these protons to neutralize electric charge so you don't have so much large positive charge you can't do anything with it. The proton wire would be super durable. It would also be lightweight if made into a composite. So overall it's super strong but super lightweight more than any other material.

While this was a theoretically possible way to improve material science I don't know if this would ever be viable because of stability issues like by cosmic rays coming in and destabilizing it. (Even so I had thought of surrounding it by heavy atomsor even sweeping lasers for some uses).

But the strong force is a short-range force and so only when you move it in closer, might the protons also have the strong Force holding them together more. And perhaps even the magnetic fields will be so super stronger than any other material that they would also keep it from imploding and fusing.

Overall the strong force is mostly zero at longer range, just like the atoms of the bell clapper converting it to an antenna by ionization. So in a way the molecule has an atom but also when you ionize it and you separate the two charges you've made it into an atom of much larger size. If you're inside that radius of the atom then you can cause induction and the field is present and it's obvious it's real.

Unlike sound light doesn't fizzle out over long distance in the low energy field and this is held by relativists to be evidence that there's really nothing there and the light carries itself and it's an inertial frame.

Bertrand Russell in one of his books in a chapter entitled "What's Seen and What's Felt" discusses about how all around us forces that push and pull us are common and taken to be for granted but for the planets or stars or high-speed without much friction, vision becomes much more important like by special relativity because of the light.

What he's ignoring is that the forces that push and pull are real too and even while gravity bends all light the same and while this is taken as evidence for the foundation of relativity because that light bending is the same as space and time, all masses fall at the same rate also. And so this must mean according to relativity that there just is no field there and it's not a real force.

But gravity has an extra tensor that relativity can't account for and while it works if you use a different amount of force to raise them, if you use the same amount of force applied to them, they fall at different rates. The moon falls at a different rate around the Moon Earth then the Earth around the Moon. Contrary to relativity for different masses, one is going to be more privileged than the other.

So while the idea of no Force works for light, it really doesn't work for the forces that push and pull that distinguish masses and that are not about the vain appearances of light even though they're valuable for special relativity as far as they go.

  The light has no friction as it travels and this is taken as evidence that it's basic to space and time which it is for special relativity of course but also it's not complete because while light doesn't fizzle out over great distance if we would say that relativity is the foundation of everything then we would have to say by relativity there would be no friction for any machines and nothing would ever wear out or run down like the light.