.
Venus In Her Blue Jeans and Pearls
In the history of life on Earth 99 percent of the life that once existed is now extinct. This is found in the fossil record over geologic time. By this it would seem a contradiction in terms that we are here. With just a one percent bet we would be here, how is it we are here on this path we walk? The ecology seems to always support the life that evolves, and the life here and now has been in no great pain in the wild for millions of years. If the environment is so harsh most life perished it wouldn't have stopped there and the one percent of the life we are also would be extinct. If you look at the number of digits- on our hands, we have the same number as the ancient fish of the cambrian because they had five fins per side. The fish are another species but we owe them some real tribute. And our DNA has lots of virus DNA that merged with our own when we were in prehistoric ages. How much we and the virus are alive is not all the way alive. Three fourths of the viral DNA may be retained so it may be said the virus is three fourths alive. If life were defined in terms of the species alone, there would be a sharp line and even at the atomic level evolution favors elements that don't have sharp jolts of power like the metals for chemical building blocks of life. An idea of absolute life also would not describe sleep well because we would be either alive or dead with no Weather Station to humerous us up! The theory of Memes says that copying is the foundation of the world, with such motifs as , "Say Me" and "Copy me". The Meme theory however says that this is possible not just in genes but in the frame of any machine made of just usual mass. This is why it's so much of import about being able to copy well from the web. The main idea of the meme theory is that the survival power of an idea is the ultimate measure of its value. Of the theory of evolution and the Meme Theory, the more general of the two is the Meme Theory. If you take a virus and powder it for 20 years it won't move or bat an eye or catch 40 winks, if you add H20 it is alive once more and going to a Stones' reunion! Darwin's theory may be extended to the idea that just as a IsuzuMazda is a machine with many inventors many of whom are praised and collecting residuals, in a real sense most of the 99 percent of the life is alive and well and much of it is here and now with you and me. Your grandmother and father are with you now and are much more alive than Darwin would have thought. They say the question of when computers will be alive is like this, they are already alive, just not 100% and no definite point will be when they are alive.
If life is both more alive and may be also 3/4 alive or resting and alive like the viruses this may be why they haven't found the explanation of the major fraction of human DNA that seems to be just random with no connection to older and wiser persons. The random DNA may be "sleeping" and be active just some of our lives. Sleep and rest are more common in evolution than otherwise. For example the heart, our most active muscle is at rest 5/6 of the month and when we talk on the wire more of the time is silence than talk so they would use the quiet breaks to send much computer info on the same line. Possibly the DNA is active just part of our life so just in a month of lab tests they wouldn't see the change, or perhaps the DNA just didn't shout loud enough! So this is my theory of life. My mom knows all about it, she's a pro, I'm just her son, she did all the heavy labor! My theory of life adds more to the definition of life, this is the cybernetic theory that all is information. This explains why the ancients believed in gods and goddesses because all is alive and if you interact with your what's in your "ecology of information" if you're strong you regard this in what it means to you, and hoping for more which is obviously in favor of survival of the individual, more is what's human, and what's more human are higher life like a goddess. The ancients believed that our every move is watched and has meaning of cosmic import and since research knows that the brain makes little distinction between any image we dream or see and an actual physical event, Darwin's theory was that in evolution even small motifs would make us vincable or invincable. All this would explain why the belief in gods and goddesses in history is so usual. My theory of heavan itself is that civilization is just a big computer that retains all the achievements of all the previous wins, like afterlifes were concieved by so many, it's just what the theory of evolution unallows since it's the inheritance of all (or most) achieved advantages. This is what the idea of the afterlife "to be remembered after we are gone because of what we did while alive" would be from. The memory of civilization, a much better memory than other animals have would be the origin of the idea that it's more absolute and eternal than even reruns of way stations. So if heaven is the creation of civilization and animals don't have this this would explain why ill societies disavow the afterlife. After all if heaven is essentially an agreement to be civilized between persons, if no agreement is reached because of woe of some sort it would be common for reduced belief in the afterlife. Just as computers can now measure beauty and brains, evidence of science about who believes who went to heavan may tell us more about the afterlife. If heavan was always considered of value by many civilizations but has no actual physical life after death (the ancients believed in the afterlife and are now in NE) and is a creation of bowlers who have lots of high life, the real URL is actually perhaps in the thoughts and agreements of the living. The afterlife may have added the value of survival in the old days to believers in tough times. So the proof of how belief in the afterlife is so usual in healthy civilizations may be by measuring the real changes in the brain where heavan lives (to me) and how much each type of belief adds how much to the health and wealth and how much survival value is achieved by real belief.
.
.
Wednesday, November 23, 2005
Business; Rent A Luxury Mazda for 200 an Hour!
.
How A Rolls May Make You Rich
And may make you the world's nicest boss! By taking out a low interest loan on a Rolls (a good used Rolls is cheaper), and with classified ads for your service to such as lawyers, doctors, and moms (she's worth it!), you can start with just a small ad in the paper and multiply up as you make more mucho. A good rate is 100 or $200 an hour.Your own rate may be higher or lower, The first hour of the month you pay the loan and then you may make 200 an hour for the rest of the month for your labor.You may know some professional who you could ask for the money to start first for advance pay of the loan plus more. And for your peace of mind, repetition of this advanced booking plan would insure that you could always pay the loan, or just go on a luxury ship splurge that month if Rio welcomes your gold, investment diamonds, and condo in Miami Beach you are so rich! Be sure to find out the rates for other towns in your area and if you're good at sales and know the people you can build a foundation of your life if you'd rather earn more than Box Lots has foam on December 22th!
This commercial I saw, It said, "Barking dog leaving you up at night? Simply push a button when the dog barks, the stopper puts out a tone to deliver a safe and harmless bark stop.". It's bark recognition softwear!
The theories and ideas on this site are, to the best of my knowlege, my own explanations, uses of existing technology, my own inventions or humor. For aid or information please call 276 228 3465 Individual results may vary. This site is not intended to diagnose cure or prevent any condition. Am I your Dr Pibb of Fizzology?- No I just wanna be your favorite author- me! instead.
.
How A Rolls May Make You Rich
And may make you the world's nicest boss! By taking out a low interest loan on a Rolls (a good used Rolls is cheaper), and with classified ads for your service to such as lawyers, doctors, and moms (she's worth it!), you can start with just a small ad in the paper and multiply up as you make more mucho. A good rate is 100 or $200 an hour.Your own rate may be higher or lower, The first hour of the month you pay the loan and then you may make 200 an hour for the rest of the month for your labor.You may know some professional who you could ask for the money to start first for advance pay of the loan plus more. And for your peace of mind, repetition of this advanced booking plan would insure that you could always pay the loan, or just go on a luxury ship splurge that month if Rio welcomes your gold, investment diamonds, and condo in Miami Beach you are so rich! Be sure to find out the rates for other towns in your area and if you're good at sales and know the people you can build a foundation of your life if you'd rather earn more than Box Lots has foam on December 22th!
This commercial I saw, It said, "Barking dog leaving you up at night? Simply push a button when the dog barks, the stopper puts out a tone to deliver a safe and harmless bark stop.". It's bark recognition softwear!
The theories and ideas on this site are, to the best of my knowlege, my own explanations, uses of existing technology, my own inventions or humor. For aid or information please call 276 228 3465 Individual results may vary. This site is not intended to diagnose cure or prevent any condition. Am I your Dr Pibb of Fizzology?- No I just wanna be your favorite author- me! instead.
.
Tuesday, November 22, 2005
Evolution And Repeating Waves of Boom And Box
The reason we are uncomfy in the winter is because it's not how it was in the wild for millions of years. We lived in the tropics till the invention of fire. This is why studies find that alternation of heat and cool is theraputic for the immune system and more. In prehistory sloshing around in the waves would have been necessary in all of our life. And in the tropics without fire there would have been heat also, so our ancient inlaws would have always or usually had a ready source of hot and rain and the necessity of oscillation between them. A good use for this would be in stores or houses with the programmable thermostats, which could alternate in cycles. If you go in the doctors office in August and about catch influenza because of the air conditioner the nurse has the perfec herb for this, a jug of fizz to ward off the chill of the AC. They say if the weather is so so, "Wait a few minutes and it will improve." Finally a weather report for the inner me. And this is also good for listening to CD ROMs on the MP3 Rio shore. By resting between sounds it saves batteries, is a real ear exercise, and would be more optimal especially for the brain. My reasoning is about how they've found that the big winners in memory research are the calm persons who rest between the exercises. Memory is a major part of the life of all thought so this is no suprise. If resting is this important, why would we have time for other activities, because activity is good for power and rest is good for activity! So a wokman that would play a song and then rest about a song or so would help the doctors and nurses feel better and sigh. Because of memory and all the other activities being improved by the right amount of rest, this method of cycles of rest may be of great import and could and should be incorporated in many activities.
They now have the world's most accurate watch, it resets by a beam of light from the stars and uses levers instead of bits to multiply up the precision and the bits won't lose a second in 10,000 years. If you passed out with this alarm watch, when you woke up you'd stretch a thousand months!
.
Evolution of Woman
We were arboreal before the ice age. When it started they say we lost the trees to amber waves of brain, so we stood up or walked out to stand up in the ocean by the shore to stay out of reach of wolves, some think. This theory of a woman I read in the 80's explains why we have no hair like the elephant, the manatee and the dolphin, who also went into the water sometime in their evolution and are smart too. Swimming is good for me. It may save a goddesses causology of evolution! This is in the book c 1975, The Descent of Woman, sort of like Darwin's book The Descent of Man. I thought it was a good or even great book, explaining much well, I was a teen then though, so this may have just been my brain and lots of exercise!
Orin Hatch supports a bill that would damage a person's computer from a distance if they downloaded illegal music, my neighbor saved and saved-her MP3 is now a boombox!
...
....
The reason we are uncomfy in the winter is because it's not how it was in the wild for millions of years. We lived in the tropics till the invention of fire. This is why studies find that alternation of heat and cool is theraputic for the immune system and more. In prehistory sloshing around in the waves would have been necessary in all of our life. And in the tropics without fire there would have been heat also, so our ancient inlaws would have always or usually had a ready source of hot and rain and the necessity of oscillation between them. A good use for this would be in stores or houses with the programmable thermostats, which could alternate in cycles. If you go in the doctors office in August and about catch influenza because of the air conditioner the nurse has the perfec herb for this, a jug of fizz to ward off the chill of the AC. They say if the weather is so so, "Wait a few minutes and it will improve." Finally a weather report for the inner me. And this is also good for listening to CD ROMs on the MP3 Rio shore. By resting between sounds it saves batteries, is a real ear exercise, and would be more optimal especially for the brain. My reasoning is about how they've found that the big winners in memory research are the calm persons who rest between the exercises. Memory is a major part of the life of all thought so this is no suprise. If resting is this important, why would we have time for other activities, because activity is good for power and rest is good for activity! So a wokman that would play a song and then rest about a song or so would help the doctors and nurses feel better and sigh. Because of memory and all the other activities being improved by the right amount of rest, this method of cycles of rest may be of great import and could and should be incorporated in many activities.
They now have the world's most accurate watch, it resets by a beam of light from the stars and uses levers instead of bits to multiply up the precision and the bits won't lose a second in 10,000 years. If you passed out with this alarm watch, when you woke up you'd stretch a thousand months!
.
Evolution of Woman
We were arboreal before the ice age. When it started they say we lost the trees to amber waves of brain, so we stood up or walked out to stand up in the ocean by the shore to stay out of reach of wolves, some think. This theory of a woman I read in the 80's explains why we have no hair like the elephant, the manatee and the dolphin, who also went into the water sometime in their evolution and are smart too. Swimming is good for me. It may save a goddesses causology of evolution! This is in the book c 1975, The Descent of Woman, sort of like Darwin's book The Descent of Man. I thought it was a good or even great book, explaining much well, I was a teen then though, so this may have just been my brain and lots of exercise!
Orin Hatch supports a bill that would damage a person's computer from a distance if they downloaded illegal music, my neighbor saved and saved-her MP3 is now a boombox!
...
....
Saturday, November 19, 2005
Atomic Spin Motor
The Power of Mass Is Spinning Energy
Many machines may be more achievable by safe atomic power. All the nuclear spins are powered by the strong force. The problem of fusion generators has been that they are trying to use something "light" in subatomic physics (the electric field) to hold down the strong force, which has much more power. If mass is just spinning energy, I think a safer source of atomic power may be found. Instead of the fusion method trying to blast the strong force particles at each other and hoping they slam in just right, here's how the spin of the strong force and the centrifugal force may be harnessed. The proton has electric charge, so if the spinning proton was made stable and the electric field connected to the shorter range strong force were tapped, the atomic power of each proton could be drained off at our leisure with much reduced risk of explosion or radioactivity. To make this motor protons could be self assembled in chains of a few, and the chain would be held stable by pulling on each side so the chain is under tension balanced in traction by the opposite magnetic poles of each proton, alternating. To tap the power an electron beam would go by the spin of the proton doing work by the field so the beam generator on one side and the collector on the other would be wired on the other side all the way around the proton chain to create a net flow of closed circuit power from spin of the protons field. Protons only are used for the machine because with both protons and neutrons which have opposite strong force fields, they would be more unstable and if a roaming particle hit the chain it would destabilize the machine and cause a nuclear explosion that could then spread to other nearby chains. And the neutrons have no electric charge so they would not have the field to tap out the strong force from the protons. For the same reason fusion power generators are considered safer than fission, since this idea has just protons which are decayed into just hydrogen building blocks, radioactivity would be low. The dream of the use of the formulas of relativity where it was thought a handfull of any mass, not just uranuim, would be enough power for a month in the country in the city would be achieved, since the power source of the protons is found in all atoms from all realms, not just uranium or hydrogen. (The city in the country is where I like village gossip-especially the world village! Aloha Island Air helps me breathe well if I'm at 30,000 when I recieve X-rays from the nurse). The protons could be seperated with a bit of power for use in the atomic motor and then the much greater power source of the protons themselves would be the power achieved. Or just as with fusion generators hydrogen could be used. Why not just use the atom itself to tap the spin of the protons and neutrons via the arm of the electrons which spin and are attached by the field to the spin of the hadrons in the atom? Because the spin of the center of the atom is random, and the proton and neutron spins mostly cancel, so more of it's wasted. And the distance of a beam close to the links of the motor would not be as much so it would also tap a lot more of the power and be a much more compact power source. It's a more atomic power source. A usual atom would get some of its spin from the hadrons but mostly the connection wouldn't be nearly so high power.
.Even with the protons seperate from the neutrons without shielding there would be a risk of an outside hadron zooming and hitting the chain and causing instability. My solutions are insulating the chains in small lead "cells" or perhaps proton solids of much smaller size or other shields and making the proton chains of few number of protons. So if the inevitable hadron makes it through the shield, it would cause just a small reaction and the lead would shield this from outside the explosion so even if it were destabilized the radioactivity wouldn't reach the other shielded cells.
. The applications of atomic spin power would be numerous. It would totally alter the world's economy, for example it would make the billions of tons of gold in the world's oceans finally within reach with a large power source to power the "filters". Instead of trash compacters all rooms could have incinerators that would divide up the compounds of the trash to the level of just hydrogen, or recombine the elements of the trash to any useful compounds, and power a miniature plant that would make for example outfits out of your metal. No more power bills, they would pay you. Radioactive waste would be boosted to the stars. You would go to the station and pick up a power box and it would cost as much as ethyl but would power your 200 mph van 10 years. (In the near term some have thought they may improve electric vehicles by power packs that they would rent at the station and the already charged packs would be reduced in mass and wait, and they've invented a slow charge up from orbit with collectors on the vehicle.) All goods would be at much lower cost since the shipping cost of trucks on the road and boats on the ocean would be reduced. With a much stronger safe power source like this travel to and from mars and the moon would be much cheaper. The price of just going to mars now is estimated in trillions. The cost of living in space stations is estimated at 1 million per person. It would be like the early days of derigibles, sooner or later a big explosion or collision would happen. It's thought even with the US Space Program any big collision or explosion would slow down the program 25 years. It may be a lot better to spend most of our colonization time out of orbit and going to and from the moon and mars with people, the only time people would be inside outer space, all the rest of the time they would be safe and sound in the rooms below the surface, for satellites and such it may be a lot safer and cheaper to do all the repairs of such as TV or cellular satellites by computer-rised machine. We may already have a good enough lighter than air lightship, the army is building "light craft" powered by lasers from the ground that are much cheaper per pound to boost to orbit, cheap power combined with this may make going to mars or the moon feasable. Light craft will be much safer in transit because no fuel to boom is on board the ship. And they may even have a cosmic speed limit in near earth orbit since the ship has enough power to go up slower at this price without having to use the high speed centrifugal force to counteract the gravity, reducing the risk of collision or crash. Once the space junk is cleared out with laser zaps to burn up the fluff, nets on rockets to boost the big stuff down for safe burnout over the ocean, we could reach the Ramada on the moon in orbit.
AUTHORS NOTE; This invention I consider of possible reduced value as of November 06, due to more consideration about the field of particles like protons and other hadrons. A main problem is that even if the inner field of hadrons is flexed by the strong force, the outer field of hadrons would spin just at the speed of light to obey the conversion of the strong force to the usual Emc2 of Einstein. (The "c" is the important number in the equation, it's the conversion number in all of relativity of mass to power. As if you have to speed up all mass to the speed of light to wring all the power out of it.) But motion of the hadron's field is not the same as work, and if the outer charge is always just at the speed of light it would just move around and not do work on the Visa. This is also a main disproof of the Hydrino Theory of Mills. If you got usual matter to achieve force changes in the electric field at more distance it would have a huge amount of power constantly being radiated out of the earth. AND it would also change all the spectra of all the stars. So a strong reason why hadrons can't be contracted to a small size may be that the centrifugal force of the strong force flexing against the electric field can't make the field go faster than light outside the hadron, so the strong force is limited by the speed of light and the charges in just multiples of the usual 1 or -1 (The reason you can add more multiples of the electric charge and go at 100%, 200%, 300%....or more of the speed of light with more charges added on is because the spin which much related with the charge, goes at say 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees....and so on so as you add more charge none of the added spins go at faster than light. You would have them layered on like this so they would always have the electric field converting the mass to energy in the usual speed of light conversion of Emc2). So if the outer spin is just in motion mostly without much extra atomic power of faster than light it might seem the atomic motor and the molecular conveyer belt motor and so on are disproven, but wait there's more! Although by this idea the atomic motor conveyer may not be feasable without extra power to make the surface do work, the atomic spin motor may be feasable. It would be easy to construct by assembling compounds in the jug, and the improved atomic motor would have the electric beam that would go by the outside of the proton's field and zoom in and actually blend in with the field so it would be pick up a lot more of the atomic power collected from the ricochet. This is like in realtor ads, wow to be rich without stepping in a room? Be a copy Chateau! If the proton won't interact by usual outer charges being in the same rest frame, bevel in and it's power. Both these types of machines would be of huge worth and are they are worth looking into. US Law says I'm the only one who can patent it since I'm the inventor, but I'm willing to consider other's donations. If you're interested, why not call 276-228-3465. I just have a year since I disclosed it to patent.
Faster Than Light, Evidence, Causology and Simple Ways To Prove or Disprove; What I call GWD General Wave Dynamics, Hopes to generalize Maxwell's use of field density/resiliency he used to exactly predict the speed of light.
The Power of Mass Is Spinning Energy
Many machines may be more achievable by safe atomic power. All the nuclear spins are powered by the strong force. The problem of fusion generators has been that they are trying to use something "light" in subatomic physics (the electric field) to hold down the strong force, which has much more power. If mass is just spinning energy, I think a safer source of atomic power may be found. Instead of the fusion method trying to blast the strong force particles at each other and hoping they slam in just right, here's how the spin of the strong force and the centrifugal force may be harnessed. The proton has electric charge, so if the spinning proton was made stable and the electric field connected to the shorter range strong force were tapped, the atomic power of each proton could be drained off at our leisure with much reduced risk of explosion or radioactivity. To make this motor protons could be self assembled in chains of a few, and the chain would be held stable by pulling on each side so the chain is under tension balanced in traction by the opposite magnetic poles of each proton, alternating. To tap the power an electron beam would go by the spin of the proton doing work by the field so the beam generator on one side and the collector on the other would be wired on the other side all the way around the proton chain to create a net flow of closed circuit power from spin of the protons field. Protons only are used for the machine because with both protons and neutrons which have opposite strong force fields, they would be more unstable and if a roaming particle hit the chain it would destabilize the machine and cause a nuclear explosion that could then spread to other nearby chains. And the neutrons have no electric charge so they would not have the field to tap out the strong force from the protons. For the same reason fusion power generators are considered safer than fission, since this idea has just protons which are decayed into just hydrogen building blocks, radioactivity would be low. The dream of the use of the formulas of relativity where it was thought a handfull of any mass, not just uranuim, would be enough power for a month in the country in the city would be achieved, since the power source of the protons is found in all atoms from all realms, not just uranium or hydrogen. (The city in the country is where I like village gossip-especially the world village! Aloha Island Air helps me breathe well if I'm at 30,000 when I recieve X-rays from the nurse). The protons could be seperated with a bit of power for use in the atomic motor and then the much greater power source of the protons themselves would be the power achieved. Or just as with fusion generators hydrogen could be used. Why not just use the atom itself to tap the spin of the protons and neutrons via the arm of the electrons which spin and are attached by the field to the spin of the hadrons in the atom? Because the spin of the center of the atom is random, and the proton and neutron spins mostly cancel, so more of it's wasted. And the distance of a beam close to the links of the motor would not be as much so it would also tap a lot more of the power and be a much more compact power source. It's a more atomic power source. A usual atom would get some of its spin from the hadrons but mostly the connection wouldn't be nearly so high power.
.Even with the protons seperate from the neutrons without shielding there would be a risk of an outside hadron zooming and hitting the chain and causing instability. My solutions are insulating the chains in small lead "cells" or perhaps proton solids of much smaller size or other shields and making the proton chains of few number of protons. So if the inevitable hadron makes it through the shield, it would cause just a small reaction and the lead would shield this from outside the explosion so even if it were destabilized the radioactivity wouldn't reach the other shielded cells.
. The applications of atomic spin power would be numerous. It would totally alter the world's economy, for example it would make the billions of tons of gold in the world's oceans finally within reach with a large power source to power the "filters". Instead of trash compacters all rooms could have incinerators that would divide up the compounds of the trash to the level of just hydrogen, or recombine the elements of the trash to any useful compounds, and power a miniature plant that would make for example outfits out of your metal. No more power bills, they would pay you. Radioactive waste would be boosted to the stars. You would go to the station and pick up a power box and it would cost as much as ethyl but would power your 200 mph van 10 years. (In the near term some have thought they may improve electric vehicles by power packs that they would rent at the station and the already charged packs would be reduced in mass and wait, and they've invented a slow charge up from orbit with collectors on the vehicle.) All goods would be at much lower cost since the shipping cost of trucks on the road and boats on the ocean would be reduced. With a much stronger safe power source like this travel to and from mars and the moon would be much cheaper. The price of just going to mars now is estimated in trillions. The cost of living in space stations is estimated at 1 million per person. It would be like the early days of derigibles, sooner or later a big explosion or collision would happen. It's thought even with the US Space Program any big collision or explosion would slow down the program 25 years. It may be a lot better to spend most of our colonization time out of orbit and going to and from the moon and mars with people, the only time people would be inside outer space, all the rest of the time they would be safe and sound in the rooms below the surface, for satellites and such it may be a lot safer and cheaper to do all the repairs of such as TV or cellular satellites by computer-rised machine. We may already have a good enough lighter than air lightship, the army is building "light craft" powered by lasers from the ground that are much cheaper per pound to boost to orbit, cheap power combined with this may make going to mars or the moon feasable. Light craft will be much safer in transit because no fuel to boom is on board the ship. And they may even have a cosmic speed limit in near earth orbit since the ship has enough power to go up slower at this price without having to use the high speed centrifugal force to counteract the gravity, reducing the risk of collision or crash. Once the space junk is cleared out with laser zaps to burn up the fluff, nets on rockets to boost the big stuff down for safe burnout over the ocean, we could reach the Ramada on the moon in orbit.
AUTHORS NOTE; This invention I consider of possible reduced value as of November 06, due to more consideration about the field of particles like protons and other hadrons. A main problem is that even if the inner field of hadrons is flexed by the strong force, the outer field of hadrons would spin just at the speed of light to obey the conversion of the strong force to the usual Emc2 of Einstein. (The "c" is the important number in the equation, it's the conversion number in all of relativity of mass to power. As if you have to speed up all mass to the speed of light to wring all the power out of it.) But motion of the hadron's field is not the same as work, and if the outer charge is always just at the speed of light it would just move around and not do work on the Visa. This is also a main disproof of the Hydrino Theory of Mills. If you got usual matter to achieve force changes in the electric field at more distance it would have a huge amount of power constantly being radiated out of the earth. AND it would also change all the spectra of all the stars. So a strong reason why hadrons can't be contracted to a small size may be that the centrifugal force of the strong force flexing against the electric field can't make the field go faster than light outside the hadron, so the strong force is limited by the speed of light and the charges in just multiples of the usual 1 or -1 (The reason you can add more multiples of the electric charge and go at 100%, 200%, 300%....or more of the speed of light with more charges added on is because the spin which much related with the charge, goes at say 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees....and so on so as you add more charge none of the added spins go at faster than light. You would have them layered on like this so they would always have the electric field converting the mass to energy in the usual speed of light conversion of Emc2). So if the outer spin is just in motion mostly without much extra atomic power of faster than light it might seem the atomic motor and the molecular conveyer belt motor and so on are disproven, but wait there's more! Although by this idea the atomic motor conveyer may not be feasable without extra power to make the surface do work, the atomic spin motor may be feasable. It would be easy to construct by assembling compounds in the jug, and the improved atomic motor would have the electric beam that would go by the outside of the proton's field and zoom in and actually blend in with the field so it would be pick up a lot more of the atomic power collected from the ricochet. This is like in realtor ads, wow to be rich without stepping in a room? Be a copy Chateau! If the proton won't interact by usual outer charges being in the same rest frame, bevel in and it's power. Both these types of machines would be of huge worth and are they are worth looking into. US Law says I'm the only one who can patent it since I'm the inventor, but I'm willing to consider other's donations. If you're interested, why not call 276-228-3465. I just have a year since I disclosed it to patent.
Faster Than Light, Evidence, Causology and Simple Ways To Prove or Disprove; What I call GWD General Wave Dynamics, Hopes to generalize Maxwell's use of field density/resiliency he used to exactly predict the speed of light.
Friday, November 18, 2005
Evolution, Ethics And Overpopulation
.
MY EXPLANATION OF WHY OVERPOPULATION IS THOUGHT TO BE THE CAUSE OF THE FALL OF THE MAYA AND OTHER CIVILIZATIONS
There are three ages when about the same level of population density was found in history to be followed by a decline of those civilizations. The Maya, Ancient Rome in 1 AD and after, and the decline of England after about 1776, the major urban areas had about 1 million in Rome and London and the Maya, followed by a decline. What caused this high density seems to be inconsideration of what had evolved by ourer hunting of predators. It's obvious that there is truth here in the proverb, there is no bad which does not bring good, and research shows with overcrowding most higher animals become ill. This in evolution would then have reduced the population, and they would have then been more healthy and this would then have added to the population with cycles that conditioned us to well established limits of just how much any one animal or human may achieve by more or reduced overpopulation. It's found in research that social pathology is more common in the city, and of course with not enough people in the country it would be more common. In evolution before the invention of fire we all lived in the tropics and had the optimum number of neighbors near and dear because we wouldn't have been living in the city or out in the country in houses and no one for miles, with the conditions most optimal for life in the outer realms of the cities, and this explains why. Another way of looking at this is the same general theory of Supply and Demand in economics, if there is more overpopulation, there would be either more competition (Demand) than than the evolved amount of competition needed for the same resources (Supply) than they would have gotten cheap in supply in all ages past leading to strain. Or the same motif rearranged; reduced resources of supply for evolution's usual amount of demand that would have won in all other times for the same labor, which would also be a strain, either way most city dwellers would lose. All there is is based on balance of action and reaction, good and bad, hot and cold, most of the life in the world is near the surface, where the forces are level. If one of these is out of balance, evolution will know. This would explain why the plague of the 14th century was followed by the brilliance of the Renaissance. Since the time from the start of the plague to the rebirth of the 14 hundreds was just one 14th the time from the start of the decline of the ancient world to the 14 hundreds, it's improbable to have been just coincidence. Even the conditions in the dark ages weren't enough to lower the overpopulation enough to revive civilization. So all around us, the high civilization before and hopefully after us may owe perhaps 90 percent of it's power just to the plague. If the dark ages were too overcrowded, and the plague hadn't reduced the overpopulation that improved the more general health of Europe, it might have stayed in the dark ages for 1000 more years.
A rather startling conclusion; we may owe our wealth and power, and the golden age of painting, literature and music, the invention of science, to mice! (This was how the plague was in ships and reached the west.)And if the overcrowding is with us today this is why half the world is in communism now. All we are is based on our relationship to land, so I think communism isn't gone, just sleeping. The overpopulation is higher than all ages past, and this would be why they have it worse in Russia now than before Vlastnost. This is why the ideas of How to Solve Overcrowding on this site may be of import to our future. Even if this method of more room is a real Win on our MSN account it wouldn't be sustainable without some real sort of reduction of overpopulation. It would buy time via the room but the problem of the pressure of Supply and Demand would return, if the same number of people per unit of room, the pressure is the same. If the number of people increases a lot we would soon use up all the room found on the moon or Mars. Space stations aren't considered an option since it would cost a million dollars per person, and they have problems with being flimsy like explosions, leaks and radiation. So I consider methods of creating more room for us to be just a temporary way out for a while. Good deeds were common in the wild for millions of years or evolution wouldn't have gone uphill. If this is proven by supply and demand, any advanced civilization would survive by voluntary limits on their numbers. All the resources would be used up otherwise. Imagine if in 50 years we all have just a foot of room. With our numbers going up, there will be a definite time when the agriculture will be outpaced by our numbers, with the land by more people always reduced for agriculture. We may reduce our number of people per unit of room by finding more of the room above, buying time enough to limit our numbers and never letting them go higher than like levels of 1800 or 1900 from that time on out. This would be salvation for those who have made a bit of error about how our ecology is, our own world, but who with a bit of effort and the power of science, could achieve the most golden exultation as good as any in the history of all neighbors-mine all are! If we have just goals and can't help us how can we help others? Even if there's no way to bring our Eden back, the way to Aurora, OH should always be North. A way to prove that overcrowding is the cause the present social pathology not found in evolution would be to take healthy volunteers who lived in the suburbs all their life and move them to the city with the same amount of money for a few years, and measure how healthy they are about fatigue, stress hormones, blood pressure, and so on. They say blood pressure goes up when a person talks. I think it may go up higher when listening to others talk, this may be of worth research for sweetheart to sweetheart talks. If you have to live in the city relief from the noise may soon be available for you without having to leave the city. They now have chips that cancel out most of the sound by an inverse wave worn as an audio. With the chip speed doubling fast, these headsets may give you sweet smooth rest. These AN machines like heads up will be in widespread use in education in just a year or two.
It's already well proven that social problems are several times more common in the cities, many would say this is not a proof of cause. They may say many of the people are poor there so this may be the problem, and drugs are used in such realms, and so on. If healthy people were moved from the country to the city with the same amount of cash, no drugs, and so forth, this would be a prediction the theory of overpopulation would prove. Of all the science and creativity on the internet, I consider this explanation of Competition and Reseouces by far the most important- all else may be worthless without life lived well and room of our own. I hope you remember I think this may be of more value about the rest of our lives than any other at this time in our history. If it's worth doing, it's worth doing for riches.
Encyclopedia Americana says that most countries have more the problem of urbanization (moving to the cities) than overcrowding. So we have another solution to buy more time and slow the overcrowding if we move to the country. This is my belief, if you want to help save the world, and sleep sound, move to the suburbs of the world village, you won't have to shout, and you'll hear the rain on the roof and see the stars. While the plan may save us for a while I think the only real solution my be by voluntary reduction of our numbers-just like a usual advanced civilization would!
.
.Without the plague, history would have been much like watching The History Channel All Month. Constantinople, the Rome of the east had much of the documents held over from the ancient world. If the Merovingian era had continued a thousand more years it's probable sooner or later Constantinople would have fallen (it fell in 1453). Without even this 1/100th of the ancient world's authorship saved on a giant computer, the ancient sculptures and vase paintings would have stayed safe in bogs and dirt, (a Venus much saved is a Venus much urned!) while with a 1000 year delay for a reawakening, authors like Shakespeare would have had to reinvent the word processor wheel. Copernicus or Newton would not have had the guidance of the ancients like Aristarchus as foundation of the heliocentric way that the earth goes around the moon "somewhat". No serious scientist after Aristotle believed the world was not round, so a latter day Columbus would have had reduced hopes of wages from the royals to find the US. Whether the western world would have been found would have been more luck; a continued age of slow life when all were in their 50's would have both reduced explorations, but increased invasions, like nations who are "having a bad day" sometimes do, because of the plague and mice. While there are obviously other influences in history (please see this link )Any important balance from millions of years of evolution by this would seem of highest worth.
.
MY EXPLANATION OF WHY OVERPOPULATION IS THOUGHT TO BE THE CAUSE OF THE FALL OF THE MAYA AND OTHER CIVILIZATIONS
There are three ages when about the same level of population density was found in history to be followed by a decline of those civilizations. The Maya, Ancient Rome in 1 AD and after, and the decline of England after about 1776, the major urban areas had about 1 million in Rome and London and the Maya, followed by a decline. What caused this high density seems to be inconsideration of what had evolved by ourer hunting of predators. It's obvious that there is truth here in the proverb, there is no bad which does not bring good, and research shows with overcrowding most higher animals become ill. This in evolution would then have reduced the population, and they would have then been more healthy and this would then have added to the population with cycles that conditioned us to well established limits of just how much any one animal or human may achieve by more or reduced overpopulation. It's found in research that social pathology is more common in the city, and of course with not enough people in the country it would be more common. In evolution before the invention of fire we all lived in the tropics and had the optimum number of neighbors near and dear because we wouldn't have been living in the city or out in the country in houses and no one for miles, with the conditions most optimal for life in the outer realms of the cities, and this explains why. Another way of looking at this is the same general theory of Supply and Demand in economics, if there is more overpopulation, there would be either more competition (Demand) than than the evolved amount of competition needed for the same resources (Supply) than they would have gotten cheap in supply in all ages past leading to strain. Or the same motif rearranged; reduced resources of supply for evolution's usual amount of demand that would have won in all other times for the same labor, which would also be a strain, either way most city dwellers would lose. All there is is based on balance of action and reaction, good and bad, hot and cold, most of the life in the world is near the surface, where the forces are level. If one of these is out of balance, evolution will know. This would explain why the plague of the 14th century was followed by the brilliance of the Renaissance. Since the time from the start of the plague to the rebirth of the 14 hundreds was just one 14th the time from the start of the decline of the ancient world to the 14 hundreds, it's improbable to have been just coincidence. Even the conditions in the dark ages weren't enough to lower the overpopulation enough to revive civilization. So all around us, the high civilization before and hopefully after us may owe perhaps 90 percent of it's power just to the plague. If the dark ages were too overcrowded, and the plague hadn't reduced the overpopulation that improved the more general health of Europe, it might have stayed in the dark ages for 1000 more years.
A rather startling conclusion; we may owe our wealth and power, and the golden age of painting, literature and music, the invention of science, to mice! (This was how the plague was in ships and reached the west.)And if the overcrowding is with us today this is why half the world is in communism now. All we are is based on our relationship to land, so I think communism isn't gone, just sleeping. The overpopulation is higher than all ages past, and this would be why they have it worse in Russia now than before Vlastnost. This is why the ideas of How to Solve Overcrowding on this site may be of import to our future. Even if this method of more room is a real Win on our MSN account it wouldn't be sustainable without some real sort of reduction of overpopulation. It would buy time via the room but the problem of the pressure of Supply and Demand would return, if the same number of people per unit of room, the pressure is the same. If the number of people increases a lot we would soon use up all the room found on the moon or Mars. Space stations aren't considered an option since it would cost a million dollars per person, and they have problems with being flimsy like explosions, leaks and radiation. So I consider methods of creating more room for us to be just a temporary way out for a while. Good deeds were common in the wild for millions of years or evolution wouldn't have gone uphill. If this is proven by supply and demand, any advanced civilization would survive by voluntary limits on their numbers. All the resources would be used up otherwise. Imagine if in 50 years we all have just a foot of room. With our numbers going up, there will be a definite time when the agriculture will be outpaced by our numbers, with the land by more people always reduced for agriculture. We may reduce our number of people per unit of room by finding more of the room above, buying time enough to limit our numbers and never letting them go higher than like levels of 1800 or 1900 from that time on out. This would be salvation for those who have made a bit of error about how our ecology is, our own world, but who with a bit of effort and the power of science, could achieve the most golden exultation as good as any in the history of all neighbors-mine all are! If we have just goals and can't help us how can we help others? Even if there's no way to bring our Eden back, the way to Aurora, OH should always be North. A way to prove that overcrowding is the cause the present social pathology not found in evolution would be to take healthy volunteers who lived in the suburbs all their life and move them to the city with the same amount of money for a few years, and measure how healthy they are about fatigue, stress hormones, blood pressure, and so on. They say blood pressure goes up when a person talks. I think it may go up higher when listening to others talk, this may be of worth research for sweetheart to sweetheart talks. If you have to live in the city relief from the noise may soon be available for you without having to leave the city. They now have chips that cancel out most of the sound by an inverse wave worn as an audio. With the chip speed doubling fast, these headsets may give you sweet smooth rest. These AN machines like heads up will be in widespread use in education in just a year or two.
It's already well proven that social problems are several times more common in the cities, many would say this is not a proof of cause. They may say many of the people are poor there so this may be the problem, and drugs are used in such realms, and so on. If healthy people were moved from the country to the city with the same amount of cash, no drugs, and so forth, this would be a prediction the theory of overpopulation would prove. Of all the science and creativity on the internet, I consider this explanation of Competition and Reseouces by far the most important- all else may be worthless without life lived well and room of our own. I hope you remember I think this may be of more value about the rest of our lives than any other at this time in our history. If it's worth doing, it's worth doing for riches.
Encyclopedia Americana says that most countries have more the problem of urbanization (moving to the cities) than overcrowding. So we have another solution to buy more time and slow the overcrowding if we move to the country. This is my belief, if you want to help save the world, and sleep sound, move to the suburbs of the world village, you won't have to shout, and you'll hear the rain on the roof and see the stars. While the plan may save us for a while I think the only real solution my be by voluntary reduction of our numbers-just like a usual advanced civilization would!
.
.Without the plague, history would have been much like watching The History Channel All Month. Constantinople, the Rome of the east had much of the documents held over from the ancient world. If the Merovingian era had continued a thousand more years it's probable sooner or later Constantinople would have fallen (it fell in 1453). Without even this 1/100th of the ancient world's authorship saved on a giant computer, the ancient sculptures and vase paintings would have stayed safe in bogs and dirt, (a Venus much saved is a Venus much urned!) while with a 1000 year delay for a reawakening, authors like Shakespeare would have had to reinvent the word processor wheel. Copernicus or Newton would not have had the guidance of the ancients like Aristarchus as foundation of the heliocentric way that the earth goes around the moon "somewhat". No serious scientist after Aristotle believed the world was not round, so a latter day Columbus would have had reduced hopes of wages from the royals to find the US. Whether the western world would have been found would have been more luck; a continued age of slow life when all were in their 50's would have both reduced explorations, but increased invasions, like nations who are "having a bad day" sometimes do, because of the plague and mice. While there are obviously other influences in history (please see this link )Any important balance from millions of years of evolution by this would seem of highest worth.
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)