Atomic Spin Motor

The Power of Mass Is Spinning Energy

Many machines may be more achievable by safe atomic power. All the nuclear spins are powered by the strong force. The problem of fusion generators has been that they are trying to use something "light" in subatomic physics (the electric field) to hold down the strong force, which has much more power. If mass is just spinning energy, I think a safer source of atomic power may be found. Instead of the fusion method trying to blast the strong force particles at each other and hoping they slam in just right, here's how the spin of the strong force and the centrifugal force may be harnessed. The proton has electric charge, so if the spinning proton was made stable and the electric field connected to the shorter range strong force were tapped, the atomic power of each proton could be drained off at our leisure with much reduced risk of explosion or radioactivity. To make this motor protons could be self assembled in chains of a few, and the chain would be held stable by pulling on each side so the chain is under tension balanced in traction by the opposite magnetic poles of each proton, alternating. To tap the power an electron beam would go by the spin of the proton doing work by the field so the beam generator on one side and the collector on the other would be wired on the other side all the way around the proton chain to create a net flow of closed circuit power from spin of the protons field. Protons only are used for the machine because with both protons and neutrons which have opposite strong force fields, they would be more unstable and if a roaming particle hit the chain it would destabilize the machine and cause a nuclear explosion that could then spread to other nearby chains. And the neutrons have no electric charge so they would not have the field to tap out the strong force from the protons. For the same reason fusion power generators are considered safer than fission, since this idea has just protons which are decayed into just hydrogen building blocks, radioactivity would be low. The dream of the use of the formulas of relativity where it was thought a handfull of any mass, not just uranuim, would be enough power for a month in the country in the city would be achieved, since the power source of the protons is found in all atoms from all realms, not just uranium or hydrogen. (The city in the country is where I like village gossip-especially the world village! Aloha Island Air helps me breathe well if I'm at 30,000 when I recieve X-rays from the nurse). The protons could be seperated with a bit of power for use in the atomic motor and then the much greater power source of the protons themselves would be the power achieved. Or just as with fusion generators hydrogen could be used. Why not just use the atom itself to tap the spin of the protons and neutrons via the arm of the electrons which spin and are attached by the field to the spin of the hadrons in the atom? Because the spin of the center of the atom is random, and the proton and neutron spins mostly cancel, so more of it's wasted. And the distance of a beam close to the links of the motor would not be as much so it would also tap a lot more of the power and be a much more compact power source. It's a more atomic power source. A usual atom would get some of its spin from the hadrons but mostly the connection wouldn't be nearly so high power.

.Even with the protons seperate from the neutrons without shielding there would be a risk of an outside hadron zooming and hitting the chain and causing instability. My solutions are insulating the chains in small lead "cells" or perhaps proton solids of much smaller size or other shields and making the proton chains of few number of protons. So if the inevitable hadron makes it through the shield, it would cause just a small reaction and the lead would shield this from outside the explosion so even if it were destabilized the radioactivity wouldn't reach the other shielded cells.

. The applications of atomic spin power would be numerous. It would totally alter the world's economy, for example it would make the billions of tons of gold in the world's oceans finally within reach with a large power source to power the "filters". Instead of trash compacters all rooms could have incinerators that would divide up the compounds of the trash to the level of just hydrogen, or recombine the elements of the trash to any useful compounds, and power a miniature plant that would make for example outfits out of your metal. No more power bills, they would pay you. Radioactive waste would be boosted to the stars. You would go to the station and pick up a power box and it would cost as much as ethyl but would power your 200 mph van 10 years. (In the near term some have thought they may improve electric vehicles by power packs that they would rent at the station and the already charged packs would be reduced in mass and wait, and they've invented a slow charge up from orbit with collectors on the vehicle.) All goods would be at much lower cost since the shipping cost of trucks on the road and boats on the ocean would be reduced. With a much stronger safe power source like this travel to and from mars and the moon would be much cheaper. The price of just going to mars now is estimated in trillions. The cost of living in space stations is estimated at 1 million per person. It would be like the early days of derigibles, sooner or later a big explosion or collision would happen. It's thought even with the US Space Program any big collision or explosion would slow down the program 25 years. It may be a lot better to spend most of our colonization time out of orbit and going to and from the moon and mars with people, the only time people would be inside outer space, all the rest of the time they would be safe and sound in the rooms below the surface, for satellites and such it may be a lot safer and cheaper to do all the repairs of such as TV or cellular satellites by computer-rised machine. We may already have a good enough lighter than air lightship, the army is building "light craft" powered by lasers from the ground that are much cheaper per pound to boost to orbit, cheap power combined with this may make going to mars or the moon feasable. Light craft will be much safer in transit because no fuel to boom is on board the ship. And they may even have a cosmic speed limit in near earth orbit since the ship has enough power to go up slower at this price without having to use the high speed centrifugal force to counteract the gravity, reducing the risk of collision or crash. Once the space junk is cleared out with laser zaps to burn up the fluff, nets on rockets to boost the big stuff down for safe burnout over the ocean, we could reach the Ramada on the moon in orbit.

AUTHORS NOTE; This invention I consider of possible reduced value as of November 06, due to more consideration about the field of particles like protons and other hadrons. A main problem is that even if the inner field of hadrons is flexed by the strong force, the outer field of hadrons would spin just at the speed of light to obey the conversion of the strong force to the usual Emc2 of Einstein. (The "c" is the important number in the equation, it's the conversion number in all of relativity of mass to power. As if you have to speed up all mass to the speed of light to wring all the power out of it.) But motion of the hadron's field is not the same as work, and if the outer charge is always just at the speed of light it would just move around and not do work on the Visa. This is also a main disproof of the Hydrino Theory of Mills. If you got usual matter to achieve force changes in the electric field at more distance it would have a huge amount of power constantly being radiated out of the earth. AND it would also change all the spectra of all the stars. So a strong reason why hadrons can't be contracted to a small size may be that the centrifugal force of the strong force flexing against the electric field can't make the field go faster than light outside the hadron, so the strong force is limited by the speed of light and the charges in just multiples of the usual 1 or -1 (The reason you can add more multiples of the electric charge and go at 100%, 200%, 300%....or more of the speed of light with more charges added on is because the spin which much related with the charge, goes at say 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees....and so on so as you add more charge none of the added spins go at faster than light. You would have them layered on like this so they would always have the electric field converting the mass to energy in the usual speed of light conversion of Emc2). So if the outer spin is just in motion mostly without much extra atomic power of faster than light it might seem the atomic motor and the molecular conveyer belt motor and so on are disproven, but wait there's more! Although by this idea the atomic motor conveyer may not be feasable without extra power to make the surface do work, the atomic spin motor may be feasable. It would be easy to construct by assembling compounds in the jug, and the improved atomic motor would have the electric beam that would go by the outside of the proton's field and zoom in and actually blend in with the field so it would be pick up a lot more of the atomic power collected from the ricochet. This is like in realtor ads, wow to be rich without stepping in a room? Be a copy Chateau! If the proton won't interact by usual outer charges being in the same rest frame, bevel in and it's power. Both these types of machines would be of huge worth and are they are worth looking into. US Law says I'm the only one who can patent it since I'm the inventor, but I'm willing to consider other's donations. If you're interested, why not call 276-228-3465. I just have a year since I disclosed it to patent.


Faster Than Light, Evidence, Causology and Simple Ways To Prove or Disprove; What I call GWD General Wave Dynamics, Hopes to generalize Maxwell's use of field density/resiliency he used to exactly predict the speed of light.