MORE ABOUT THE RELATIVISTIC WIND TUNNEL
..
The speed of light seems to be an assumption of Einstein's based on his faith in just the one experiment, the speed of light by the Michelson Morley experiment. The speed of light actually is unlike other speeds such as of sound in relativity because it's constant and is supposed to be the limit. In all the other examples of wave motion you see, with changes in the density of the field, the top speed is changed. More or less field density and the wave speed is higher or lower, (or vice versa depending on the type of waves. They come in pairs so some speed up while others slow down to conserve momentum.). This is a general principle, well proven with many waves and many speeds. And Maxwell used this assumption of the general speed of waves when the density is changed to predict the exact speed of light. For both these reasons my belief is that a lighter field like gravity may have it's wave motion at faster than light, according with the density of the wave, it's much less dense, so it would be much faster than light. The speed of light of relativity would just be one example of the many more examples in physics of the speed being according to the density.
You have all these relativistic effects. If gravity is in another wavelength and so isn't much effected by relativity because it's another wavelength so like an antenna at another wavelength it mostly just passes right through the relativistic field of light where do all the relativistic effects go? Do they just disappear? As on THIS LINK where I say if the speed of light is electromagnetic, and the relative speed of the field is what counts in Special Relativity, if we set up a high energy electromagnetic field and measure the effects of the motion of the field on stationary mass in the box, this could be a sort of Relativistic "Wind tunnel" where we can measure and bring into the lab all the motifs of Relativity. I liken relativistic motifs to a ship out in the ocean. As it ploughs through the waves, it sets up a shock wave in the ocean. If we assume that the ship is limited to moving just in the water, the more you accelerate it, the water resists it with more pressure. The speed of the waves like the speed of sound in air can be constant, and we might assume it would take infinite energy to go much faster than the top speed of the wave. This is based on just the assumption like with Einstein, the top speed is limited to the waves of the ocean and that ship could never spread out wings and take to the air or go into the more reduced field of high speed through the cosmos in general. The idea that the speed of light is the top speed would seem to be just axiom and fit in with these more general examples of the more general idea that top speed of a force is determined by wave density. Ultimately all of physics is or will be derived from some sort of axiom. This is why Einstein is great, he found physics of much worth, but no doubt while any current proof by the evidence is an axiom till disproved in a sense, and all science has it's axioms of proof at any time in the history of science, some motifs are more general that others, and I think this may be so for Relativity.
If gravity is much faster than light, I think all the relativistic motifs won't just disappear if we measured high speed events with higher speed gravity waves. The properties that are unchanged and that aren't just relative to the observer (like the mass augmentation, which would be caused by pressure of the field) would be distinguished from just what's relative to the observer. For instance observers at more than one speed find two masses for another high speed body in motion, obviously this isn't as fundamental to the physics as the pressure causing the distinction of the mass. If the more general physics are determined by field density, this may be like a ship in the ocean, and all the relativistic motifs would be determined by the way the field reacts to changes in pressure including the mass augmentation, the Fitzgerald Contraction, the slowing of time and the Doppler redshift, would all be measurable or at least more provable by the Relativistic wind tunnel, since the long range fields of relativity are simple many of the motifs might be proven to have simple mechanical causes. (For example the slowdown of time would be caused by all the particles of the high speed mass spinning like small clocks, time has always been found to be related with periodic events in all experiments so time is proportional to frequency and is an acceleration which is one complete spin of the particle, time would be slowed by stretching out to the field and so all the small watches would have a stretched out motion like a helix so the slowdown of time would be caused by the angular motion of each clock being converted to linear via the high speed motion.) If we look from higher up to see a ship on the ocean via the faster speed of light available to us perhaps, from the point of view of an airship, the physics of the pressure of the wave don't disappear, obviously Einstein was a genius. While most of the motion of the boat is about the waves of the sea, it's not general enough to assume the boat or hovercraft would have no way to go up in the air, some have motors of power to achieve air travel.. The wave physics of the ship won't just disappear, but they might be extended to more general physics. All the relativistic effects might be measured by gravity if higher speed just as the waves of the ship in the ocean are measured by the higher speed light of the airship. As I say on the link about the relativistic wind tunnel, one of the main problems about going to the speed of light is about the fuel problem, it would take so much boost of the rockets to reach the speed of light, H.G. Wells would be out of the good economy! This might be solved by making the wind tunnel small, the way they now are building cheap atom smashers that any lab has the cash so high power physics are in the realm of more.
It's been believed that with forthcoming experiments to see if the idea of faster than light signals as in Einstein's own EPR Paradox reach from satellites in orbits at more distance, if it's indeed faster than light, they say you could have both observers both saying they were first instead of simultaneous. But the lack of the simultaneous time is a hallmark of Special Relativity because the distance us great and the light is slow to reach. You can never say which even is before or after for great distances, like to know what's up at Alpha Centauri in a few minutes. It's equally valid to say either us or the distant observer is definitely first. So I think if faster than light is proven by the experiments, it will actually restore simultaneous connections and know who is first, an important disproof of relativity because nothing could be connected up more than expand outward, and gravity couldn't hold the cosmos so energy conservation would be violated with all the mass expanding outward with no connection if gravity is not faster than light, which it may be..-
Here's why a Starship isn't "Ploughing through the Field" in uniform motion near the speed of light with lots of friction and the speed of light changing, even though the assumption of this field and the speed of light according to it's resilience is the basis of many ofter speeds of waves in fluids, and Maxwell's exact prediction of the speed of light, Eenstien's Spell Lift Elevator!
You have all these relativistic effects. If gravity is in another wavelength and so isn't much effected by relativity because it's another wavelength so like an antenna at another wavelength it mostly just passes right through the relativistic field of light where do all the relativistic effects go? Do they just disappear? As on THIS LINK where I say if the speed of light is electromagnetic, and the relative speed of the field is what counts in Special Relativity, if we set up a high energy electromagnetic field and measure the effects of the motion of the field on stationary mass in the box, this could be a sort of Relativistic "Wind tunnel" where we can measure and bring into the lab all the motifs of Relativity. I liken relativistic motifs to a ship out in the ocean. As it ploughs through the waves, it sets up a shock wave in the ocean. If we assume that the ship is limited to moving just in the water, the more you accelerate it, the water resists it with more pressure. The speed of the waves like the speed of sound in air can be constant, and we might assume it would take infinite energy to go much faster than the top speed of the wave. This is based on just the assumption like with Einstein, the top speed is limited to the waves of the ocean and that ship could never spread out wings and take to the air or go into the more reduced field of high speed through the cosmos in general. The idea that the speed of light is the top speed would seem to be just axiom and fit in with these more general examples of the more general idea that top speed of a force is determined by wave density. Ultimately all of physics is or will be derived from some sort of axiom. This is why Einstein is great, he found physics of much worth, but no doubt while any current proof by the evidence is an axiom till disproved in a sense, and all science has it's axioms of proof at any time in the history of science, some motifs are more general that others, and I think this may be so for Relativity.
If gravity is much faster than light, I think all the relativistic motifs won't just disappear if we measured high speed events with higher speed gravity waves. The properties that are unchanged and that aren't just relative to the observer (like the mass augmentation, which would be caused by pressure of the field) would be distinguished from just what's relative to the observer. For instance observers at more than one speed find two masses for another high speed body in motion, obviously this isn't as fundamental to the physics as the pressure causing the distinction of the mass. If the more general physics are determined by field density, this may be like a ship in the ocean, and all the relativistic motifs would be determined by the way the field reacts to changes in pressure including the mass augmentation, the Fitzgerald Contraction, the slowing of time and the Doppler redshift, would all be measurable or at least more provable by the Relativistic wind tunnel, since the long range fields of relativity are simple many of the motifs might be proven to have simple mechanical causes. (For example the slowdown of time would be caused by all the particles of the high speed mass spinning like small clocks, time has always been found to be related with periodic events in all experiments so time is proportional to frequency and is an acceleration which is one complete spin of the particle, time would be slowed by stretching out to the field and so all the small watches would have a stretched out motion like a helix so the slowdown of time would be caused by the angular motion of each clock being converted to linear via the high speed motion.) If we look from higher up to see a ship on the ocean via the faster speed of light available to us perhaps, from the point of view of an airship, the physics of the pressure of the wave don't disappear, obviously Einstein was a genius. While most of the motion of the boat is about the waves of the sea, it's not general enough to assume the boat or hovercraft would have no way to go up in the air, some have motors of power to achieve air travel.. The wave physics of the ship won't just disappear, but they might be extended to more general physics. All the relativistic effects might be measured by gravity if higher speed just as the waves of the ship in the ocean are measured by the higher speed light of the airship. As I say on the link about the relativistic wind tunnel, one of the main problems about going to the speed of light is about the fuel problem, it would take so much boost of the rockets to reach the speed of light, H.G. Wells would be out of the good economy! This might be solved by making the wind tunnel small, the way they now are building cheap atom smashers that any lab has the cash so high power physics are in the realm of more.
It's been believed that with forthcoming experiments to see if the idea of faster than light signals as in Einstein's own EPR Paradox reach from satellites in orbits at more distance, if it's indeed faster than light, they say you could have both observers both saying they were first instead of simultaneous. But the lack of the simultaneous time is a hallmark of Special Relativity because the distance us great and the light is slow to reach. You can never say which even is before or after for great distances, like to know what's up at Alpha Centauri in a few minutes. It's equally valid to say either us or the distant observer is definitely first. So I think if faster than light is proven by the experiments, it will actually restore simultaneous connections and know who is first, an important disproof of relativity because nothing could be connected up more than expand outward, and gravity couldn't hold the cosmos so energy conservation would be violated with all the mass expanding outward with no connection if gravity is not faster than light, which it may be..-
Here's why a Starship isn't "Ploughing through the Field" in uniform motion near the speed of light with lots of friction and the speed of light changing, even though the assumption of this field and the speed of light according to it's resilience is the basis of many ofter speeds of waves in fluids, and Maxwell's exact prediction of the speed of light, Eenstien's Spell Lift Elevator!
...
..
An NFL star is fiancee of Sonya Richards, Olympic runner, Atheletes run in our family too!
Doctor overcharge you? Set up a $ a year for the health coverage to pay the bill, say you're saving a lot, if the doctor is trying to help and of worth you'll live to be 100,00 and in good life and the nurse will make a fortune!
- -
