-
Dental surgeons are using clips from MTV so pain of the patient is stopped more when the drill is in operation, and my nurse has memorized all the words of a million Old Wave rhymes!
They say yoga is more famous out west than in India. It's amazing-a real stretch of imagination! I was able to hold my breath for 3000 cycles of passing out with Denise Austin!
They've invented electric shoes that tie by the grip on your foot while you while you walk. (If I should so tie my feetwear, my shoes would jog away in the 80's!)
They have computers that actually improvise by the musicians song in time. The musician toots and then the computer improvises, the musician drums, and so forth. This is me in the shower, or as the family likes to say about my songs- me in a soundproof room!
Did you hear the fashion dames in Rome are on strike? They want more regulation so just the professionals have the evidence they earned a degree in advanced dish!
I had an old handheld tape dubber type sound machine, AM/FM, left and right-a sh'boom sh' boom box!
I learned how to drive safe- all the RV's and other machines at the college were so smashed up we couldn't drive them, so no accidents!
I had a TV I stacked on my tape dubber so I would save more room, and in all the months since I put them on the shelf, the movies had not once fallen in the sound!
THE FOLLOWING IS FOR THOSE WHO ARE UP ON MODERN PHYSICS, I'LL TRY TO JUSTIFY EACH MEMO WELL, AFTER I REEDITED THIS IT'S FOR MORE A GENERAL AUDIENCE, EVEN SO, IF YOU'RE GOOD AT MATH OR SOUNDS, SEE MAIN LINKS PAGE SITE MAP UPPER LEFT FOR MY MATH AND MUSIC, COMICS AND SO ON. IN ANY EVENT FOR PHYSICISTS OR THOSE INTERESTED IN PHYSICS...
.
Possible ways to Actuate Gravity Waves
I read in Popular Mechanics how the physicist of world renoun, Ning Li, a few years ago built the working antigravity machine (this was in the old Popular Mechanics I consider this more reliable, the new edit is by another author). It uses the spins of many particles (such as protons') electric fields to change the flow of the field.
This site says about N. Lee's experiments
"A third method for antigravity described in the book which is also still being considered today by some, is spinning a superconducting disk at high rpm and causing a reduction in gravity above the disk. While our knowledge of gravity is so limited that it is difficult to say that this method will not work, there is a natural example that does disprove this method as having any effect on gravity. Neutron stars are very dense bodies that spin very very rapidly, and as they cool down over time, the core of the Neutron star becomes superconducting. If a rapidly spinning superconductor had any ability to block or weaken gravity, it would have very noticeable effects on neutron stars and those effects are not seen. For as the core cooled and became superconducting, the core would block the gravity holding the neutron star together, which if it blocked enough gravity, the neutron star would explode in a truly massive explosion. Even a small partial weakening of gravity would cause the neutron star to expand which would slow the rotation of the star and in turn would slow the pulsating radio signal that these stars emit. A slowing with age, has not been observed in neutron stars, so rapidly spinning superconductors do not have any effect on gravity."
I think the assumption that the stars and spinning wheel are the same is not guaranteed disproof. It was assumed by the greeks up to the time of the 19th century that two lines are always parallel. With more science saavy Einstein found that with enough distance, the lines merge with enough distance. And two elements on the periodic table are already so complex there's no way to know what the properties of the chemicals the combine to will be. No way is known to predict the properties of salt from the elements that combine to lower blood pressure better than salt. The assumption that the spinning wheel and the star are the same is not proven, the shape of the spinning wheel is planar and the star is round. Shape often has a good bit to do with what a field is about, as in the above about the lines of geometry and gravity. Subatomic particles don't have exact spherical shape (the proton has been found to actually be shaped like an exercise brightbell) so they may stack in ways that cut off or cause the lines of superconductivity itself, another way the geometry of the field may not allow that the disc and the star are the same. And a neutron star is hot. The antigravity machines of Li use supercooled particles. A dense star has extreme heat, so it may take much more cooling than the star has to make the star superconduct. There are many who believe that neutron stars don't create much of a ray, and it may even be possible the light seen is not from these types of stars, and are, for example from stars that lase, like a laser. All this allows that likening neutron stars to machines like Li's is not disproof of the antigravity machines of this type. I think it's at least possible.
All forces are made both of waves and particles. The waves send the information about the particles between them, so that they are connected and this makes them all one field so energy conservation, the most well proven general theory in the history of science, is upheld. So not too suprising is that Einstein predicted that gravity waves transmit the force of gravity in the early 1900's.
I think Lee's machine is not impossible because Einstein himself believed in electrogravity, here's why I agree with Einstein about electrogravity itself and experiments to prove or disprove my possuble additions to it.
If this turns out to be other than the usual electric fields that lift us up against the gravity it may be a good gravity wave telescope. If you have two antennas of the same wavelength they resonate well (if they are unlike they pick up gossip stations!). I've theorized that gravity being lighter than light would travel faster than light ( or see Below MY EXPLANATION Of FASTER THAN LIGHT WAVE MOTION (NOW FOUND IN THE LAB By CHEN'S EXPERIMENT) so Li's machine may prove or disprove this, and if it sends the waves well, being a good emitter it may also absorb the waves efficiently and may be a way to send faster than light information via the waves.
. A problem with gravity waves if they are lighter than light by far may travel much faster than light, you can throw a bottle of fizz much farther and faster than a fizz machine, overall so gravity would travel much faster than light. If it is this fast Lee's machine wouldn't pick up the signal well even if it is a good emitter and absorber of gravity waves (see above).
This would be because Einstein's Special Relativity says that the electric charges of the machine itself being electromagnetic and about Special Relativity, wouldn't be able to go faster than light because of the all important (electromagnetic) speed of light to relativity except in the special exception of the heavy particles of subatomic physics that are more dense than electric charges (see below).
Antigravity/Gravity Augumentation Using Oscillation of Centrifugal Force, My Experiment and Comments
GRAVITY POWERED MACHINES, ARE THEY GOOD PHYSICS? THE SECOND EXPERIMENT.
A Super Zoom, How to Find Earthlike Worlds
You see these telescopes that use an array of small collectors at a distance that are unified to combine the images from the seperate machines so it's as if it's one image from a giant telescope. We have been in the age of astrononomy without astronomers looking up at the stars for 30 years. The number of photons collected per day with the great distances seen is so small the only way to see is via photos of the light, collected over days or months. A type of telescope that's been devised is to use what are known as magnetic bubbles, these are of worth to sail through the solar system with cheap power via the solar wind. The bubbles expand with more distance from the sun and with more surface area the amount of the force to move it stays the same, making magnetic bubbles a cheap way for future starships to reach beyond the solar system's shores and shoals of space. My belief is these bubbles may make a giant lense and there would be no image problems like displacement of light by the adaptive optics if a special kind were used. To make the bubble into a great telescope the magnetic field would leave and enter two N-S sides of the machine. To take out most of the random change, it's believed the inward flow of the field would be watched for changes by another beam through the field after it had focused the light, and the general small motions of the field lines would be taken out of the image by way of the sensor. Once the telescope was in focus enough in general to see the disc of a nearby world the computer would focus better, and then a more distant world or star would be in focus and so on to the maximum resolution. When you have a lense like the lenses in use, even with other ruses the modern science of light uses like the images unified by the machines to improve the picture, these machines are still limited by not that much more light collected and this is the main problem. If you have five machines and they collect amount a of light an hour if you have a magnetic bubble that's 500,000 times the size it would collect 500,000 times the light/hour. This would either allow astronomers to return to the machine or for us to find images at 500,000 times higher resolution, and this would be how to find the worlds like the Earth.
ABOUT SUBCOMPONENTS OF SUBATOMIC PARTICLES AND THE ELECTRIC FIELD
.
Good subatomic physicists have thought for thirty years there are many fractional charges (wikipedia) possible for the electric or strong force charge, but these are not found with the atom smashers. The fractional and other quantum numbers combine to explain all the hundreds of subatomic particles, not one combination has been seen to disprove the building blocks of fractional charges, this is why the fractional charges are considered of worth to science. Even so no one has been able to prove why no isolated fractional charges are seen or why the force between them seems to even be stronger at lower energy and more distance, about 10-13 cm the radius of a meson or baryon the heavy particles of subatomic physics. If the general framework is relativity and the strong electric charges on the outside layer of each meson or baryon, this could control all the rest so relativity would be upheld even if mere light and electromagnetic charges were the general foundation by Maxwell's exact prediction of the speed of light based on the density of the field being the cause of the speed of the waves through it. In my improvement of Maxwell's explanation, the speed of light is not the top speed because the speed can be faster or slower than light just by changing the density of the field of the strong force or other force, just like usual waves in other media. (Gravity may move much faster than light because it's much lighter while the strong force may move a good bit faster than light because it's more dense, both types of wave ones that speed up with increasing or decreasing density are needed in physics because of energy conservation what's increased by one wave is decreased by another in the balance of Newton's third law, action reaction.). This about the speed of waves via density is a more general idea than Einstein's where the speed of light we have to take on faith because it would unify more of physics, and this would be for instance as in Relativity why all the mass and energy around us doesn't move at the speed of light or why the sun doesn't convert mass to energy instantly, as I have abridged for you in my Physics Synopses. If the heavy particles like the mesons and baryons are more dense than Relativity would allow, the above would allow that they are still controlled by Einstein's E=mc2 even if the strong force is usually much more stout than electric charges. This allows both my improved version of Maxwell's general causology of motion (even though he later abandoned this idea even if he had used it to predict the speed of light) at both faster and slower than light (based on changes in wave density being proportional to changes in speed like Maxwell's) and Einstein's in subatomic physics where the spin of the electric charges at higher radii and lower energy obey relativity because the electric charges are unified so the speed of light is in comtrol. The strong force is more dense than the electromagnetic field so it would spin faster than light.
If mass energy is conserved and so is quantity of motion, it makes sense that mass energy is motion. Energy moves in a linear path, and if mass is motion as well it would have to move also, and since it can't move linearly, it would be spin that would determine mass generally. The atom bomb has lots of linear motion derived from the spin of the strong force, this much power would be stored in a simple way, because extremes are often about simplicity.
... If the mass is spin and the fractional quanta have the same spin as a lower density electron, how can a particle be of any other mass than an electron, of 1837 times more mass and the more complex properties are unexplainable by Einstein's theory? In the standard theory just integer or half integer spins are allowed for all particles, the subparticles of hadrons also would have the same spin as all other particles of the standard causology. Einstein's own relativity would govern the outside spin of the hadrons at the usual speed (of light) as much as it could when the heavy particle was created, flexing the more dense electromagnetic field than usual making it strong enough by interaction with the strong force to control all the general properties of the strong force. Maxwell's causology and my generalization of it would perhaps control physics inside the meson or bayron's spin at faster than light, once the power is poured in the cup and also out by means of the mediation of the strong electromagnetic field. This is of power enough by the higher speed strong force acceleration and the reaction back of the electromagnetic field via relativistic effects to more strongly control the strong force than electricity would at usual energies. To explain the much heavier mass of hadrons and the more complex properties of the strong force the spin is faster inside the heavy particle, but always is slowed on the outside, just to the usual speed of the spin.
.
To make a higher power hadron you must take an electron or other low power charge and power it up (riches are cheaper if poverty is saved). This is because of energy conservation, you can't just make a higher power field out of no field. So you always have to start out with a charge of just 1 or -1, the only charges of electromagnetism seen. This is 100% of a charge, the strong force in my causology of GWM, General Wave Mechanics then divvies this up into the fractional charges, they are of fractional charges just inside the realms of such as mesons or baryons. With the fractional charges they're lighter than light so they spin inside the hadron at faster than light. No fractional charges are seen outside the hadron, when they would go outward they would plow the strong electric field, slowing them to the speed of light. At just the speed of light the charges would unified in accord with the speed to the 100% of the charge outside the hadron, and so they would return to just 1 or -1. This would explain why even though most physicists have believed the fractional charges make up the baryons and mesons in combinations that allow all the hundreds of heavy particles, no isolated electric charges other than 1 or -1 have been observed in the machines, because of relativity.
In my belief Einstein's causology is proof about the field outside the hadron and elsewhere being in control via the speed limit here of light, but the speed of light is not fundamental; many types of machines exist and the way heavy particle would be always built is just one way among many possible in subatomic physics. Few of us download a hat when we wake up in shower in the AM/FM. The idea that to make a higher power field by the flow of power through a low power field is arbitrary in GWD.
My causology of a meson or baryon;
There are four layers, from outside radius in;
A. The outside layer of electric field at the speed of light, giving the hadron its electric charge and other long range electromagnetic motifs including conservation of relativity in all longer distance physics (except perhaps the lower than electromagnetic density of gravity).
B. A layer of low energy matter wave between this and the realm of fractional charges of the strong force blending the strong force in with the outer layer connecting the strong field with the electric field at the speed of light via the field,
C. The imploding strong force field, spinning and imploding at faster than light according to it's density via my extension of Maxwell's theory (this would explain Chin's experiment that found tunneling through hadrons at about 1.3 times the speed of light, in inverse average speed to the reduced weight of the lighter fractional charges, which are about the same amount lighter than the speed measured is faster than light) and
D. the innermost radii of the weak charge.
The layer between the strong force and the electric field would be connected by a field like a matter wave Einstein proposed in the EPR paradox. This would be needed to link the information between the fractional charges and the outer electric field. This wouldn't be connected by a usual electromagnetic field because with the difference in speed between the fractional charges of the strong force and the outer field, field lines with more friction would radiate out lots of energy powered by the strong force continously flexing, and this is not found. The low power layer of between layer a. and c. at the speed of light and faster than light would be much the same as the field connecting electrons with the nucleus in the atom. While actually layers a, b, and c are blended well they are distinct enough to be of descriptive worth. An alternate way to the low radiation limit may be by the more wavelike and mostly atractive implosion of the strong force, concievably it may have low efficiency in it's interaction with the charges so they would be accelerated to just somewhat faster than light when the strong force slides past the electric charges with considerable relativistic boost to the mass, but no more than the limit of the efficiency.
The reason the strong fractional charges radiance could be imploded without much outward flow of field except via the virtual field could be because the strong force, like gravity, is of low efficiencey. Forces are actions and reactions, energy conservation holds by balance, like a weight on a boom you use to measure another weight. Gravity and electromagnetism are one action reaction pair, and the strong force, with the short range weak force are another. Electromagnetism and the Weak Force were unified in the Nobel prize winning Electroweak theory, these are the two short range contact forces in physics, they both have pairs of charges and expand on pressure. They are of lower efficiency than 100% by radiance of heat with work being done. But like the strong force, gravity never wears out or runs down, it's attractive with expansion never seen. So gravity with electromagnetism is like the strong with the weak force, forming the two main actions and reactions of physics. The strong force, if like gravity would have 100% or near 100% efficiency of implosion, so the field wouldn't leak out radiation from the much higher speed field of the strong force, even with continous flexing and much work being achieved. All the power of the strong force except the connection to the outer electric field would implode inward and power the Weak force. If more of the fractional charges would be in heavier hadrons, they would spin faster and add more spin to the outside electric field via the virtual field, this would keep the electric field and the strong force unified, so it always would be converted in E=mc2 with the usual linear power of relativity.
This would explain how relativity is upheld in subatomic physics, the larger mass of heavier particles than electrons by more spin at faster than light, and why the fractional charges always unify to 1, -1, or 0. Once the strong force would implode the field of the fractional charges, this flow would be channeled down to the central weak force charge, heating it up like the heating of the electric charges of the earth, by gravity, except with the other two forces, the strong force and the weak radiant force. So this implosion eventually powers the radiation of the atomic power via radioactivity.
