Are Gravity Powered Machines Good Physics?
....
...There are patents on them, but do they work without violation of energy conservation? These machines are sort of like a bucket and a weight on a boom, the balance makes it so they lift even "old energy" in the pail, and this is an ancient machine used in egypt to lift the nile of 3000 BC awhile. A gravity powered machine now in use has weights on both ends of a boom. This is rather like power steering when you go out for a whirl in your Chevy, you have the forces the same on either side, so it just takes a bit of force to move the column. If you put a machine to generate electricity powered by the tires side to side motion, the force could be used to achieve work if the balance of the pressure of the fluid in the power steering were cheap (I just wave my hand on the wheel when a goddess jogs past, and when she'll gossip awhile, I'm strong to lift her a bit via just saying hi!) With the gravity powered machine instead of constant power of the power steering used to cause the multiplied force of the machine, it's replaced by gravity. Even so gravity is unlike the balanced hydraulic pressure of power steering because it never runs out of power and balance of the forces. So if you had two weights on both sides and each weighs 1000 lbs it seems it would be of worth to use that balance like with the power steering wheel to move a machine to do work. (Inertia would be more but this would just be solved by slowing the machine.)
-
...This is easy to prove just with a simple experiment, if you use use a beam with holes or other like clamps that hold two pound exercise brightbells looped in the sidewise beam on the side of a pivot like a sawhorse and another beam of comparable mass to the weights of like wood of 2 or 3 ft broad above the machine, when you have the weights you can lift one of them just by moving your center of mass towards it, and once the mass is removed at the top if at the same time the center of mass is moved to the other weight, it's easier to balance also, this is much easier than lifting the weight, it's why machines like this are used instead of lifting 1000 lbs by hand. You'll see the weight is much easier to lift with the boom on top than without by just moving the center of mass when you load, and it's easy to balance the machine for a reload just by moving the center of mass because the boom of wood adds force like the wheel power to multiply up the power. The main point here is that if you first lift and drop the weight with the other, and then add another moderately heavy beam to lift the same weight, you'll notice it's much easier! And to move the center of balance of the machine to relift the weight takes reduced labor where the machine has a roller and is in balance. This is how gravity power machines multiply up the mechanical advantage. If you had two 5000 lb weights and you try to lift five pounds this is much easier than if you lift five pounds without the machine, just as if you put a weight by the side of a wheel and move it by power steering (don't try this at 100 mph!) it would be much easier to move from where you, in the editors sofa and not asleep at the wheel control by small motion than with a van without power steering, as in the experiment. Instead of the force of the power steering causing the balance of the wheels, the force of gravity is used with the two weights, and this would be caused by the pressure of the flow of the particles of the field, a more inexaustable power source than the power steering. (I think it's even possible the field itself may never run out of energy, for why and how, click here..) Whatever the cause of the flow if it exerts pressure to cause the machine to multiply up, this like the flow of other fields may be useful if tapped, a sort of hydroelectric power flow. With these machines each stamping motion generates force that also lifts the machine to the next stamp on the other side. The egyptian machine they use to this day (the bucket and boom and weight) could be used for power of this via combining it with a turbine by lifting water or other stuff in the bucket, dropping it in a turbine for power and while the beam is at rest at a higher level the pivot of the machine is moved to where the empty bucket and the weight balance by the weight of the beam. By letting both bucket and weight rest while moving the pivot, more advantage is gotten each time the bucket is raised or lowered enough to achieve extra power. A bucket and boom could operate by no other means if this were untrue. This may seem to violate energy conservation, but if there were not more power gotten out than we put in, this machine would be out of use and all sorts of machines like levers or machines of other types would not be in use.
...
Say you have two buckets of liquid stuff, one one liter and one two liters. If the weight of the beam (the force multiplier) is 1 on each side, the weight on one side is 2 an on the other side is 3, and the ratio is 3/2 or 60%. If the weight of the beam is much raised to 100 on both sides, the ratio to lift the bucket is 102/101 or about 1%. And once the heavy bucket has been lifted and emptied to equal the 1 liter jug, they both weigh the same to lower it down to reload. The weight of the extra one liter is all of the liter, so the cost of lifting it has been reduced by almost 60%, and the more weight is put on the beam the more power is saved, and the rebound these machines use with with each stamp and optimally moving the lever arm makes the savings more by using the inertia of the weight to multiply the force. This is something even Archimedes or all the world's inventors since might have invented. Archimedes was the author of volumes of sound and action adventure. No doubt he knew about lifting weights on machines, the difference is using the weight itself lifted like water to then do work. This may seem obvious, but someone had to put the memo on the first website! This is the genius of gravity powered machines.
When you think about this, moving a pack like a luggage cart sideways up a hill is much easier than to put the weight on your back for the same distance, thus the sideways motion of the beam at the top of the cycle to take up the imbalance as the bucket is emptied at the top can be counterbalanced more easily than just by way of the pressure of gravity that also makes it near to 60% better.
..
Not only is the weight of both masses reduced, their inertia is increased. If you took the two weights to orbit and weightlessness, the weight would be 0 and the force needed both to start and stop the masses would be much the same, so energy is conserved. But when the machine is moved to the earth's surface, like motion of the wheel on the superhighway, more force is able to move the "reduced weight". Gravity is implosive and is reversed in the outward entropy of more common force, so gravity seems to have opposite entropy.
..
Click here for several patents on gravity powered machines, see field of invention.
..
Each time a machine like the bucket is lifted there's extra hydrolectric power out and the overall spin of the earth is reduced just a bit. Even more amazing is that engineers have been trying to invent machines like this since ancient times but didn't know what they were. I think the Energy Conservation Promotion Foundation has named the conservation of motion the same as the conservation of motive power, which seems to be something else, with gravity, at any rate. The motion of the higher energy field like electrodynamics is balanced by the electric charges with conservation of motion because it's mostly balanced but gravity is continually violating conservation of motive power locally by wringing out the power of the earth and sun, no matter how much time passes there will always be more of the motive power. And since relativity is about the speed of light and thus electrodynamics of electricity and the balance of charges, gravity is perpetually imbalanced and so the power of these machines is proof of the opposition of special relativity and gravity. Einstein himself believed that a massive body gains mass with time by way of the gravity, as they've found with supermassive astronomy where there is no matter falling in, yet the masses are increasing at the right rate to be explained by implosion of particles of the field. As I say here on my Physics Synopses Link I think this is because gravity is not relativistic and so gravity and other waves like the strong force spinning around may move at faster than light.
..
You may know that a spinning mass keeps the same rate of spin, even so the sun is continually radiating out power. If the sun or a spinning wheel were more important, I believe the sun would be. Though the sun may overpower the quanta, even so the same field is here trying to boost acceleration, an asymmetrical field by definition may have extra flow of power. If a gyroscope were gravity powered and the field is there like in common gravity of a centrifuge much the same by Einstein's equivalence principle and Einstein's other idea of mass augmentation, wouldn't it speed up? This relates to a fundamental question about gravity, if gravity causes the redshift of light and redshift is an expansion of wavelength, why isn't the Earth inside out? My answer is that gravity itself may operate on a much different wavelength, that has Blueshift Click Here , because gravity brings masses together, it doesn't cause reradiation mostly (while I agree with Einsteins other idea here too that it may reradiate with i.e. cosmic acceleration, mostly it's implosive.) Because gravity is attractive Einstein's idea about mass augmentation with time may be more true than the conservation of angular momentum because it's something different. So while the Earth doesn't speed up, it certainly has an acceleration we constantly feel. I believe gravity is not the same as relativity, because the speed of light is only constant in uniform motion, and gravity is an acceleration, it can't be cancelled by the choice of frame of motion, gravity implodes, and linear motion may cause the radiance outward of centrifugal force, and so on. The use of this distinction may be by gravity powered machines, gravity like a sort of giant one way valve to give the huge weight to the rocks of the Earth, and the outflow if like Einstein believed and by my idea it's mostly of a lower wavelength so we don't fall off the Earth by antigravity, and also to have the Earth not gaining much weight from the implosion of the field. If the inflow is not the same as the outflow, a constant force is being created. The use of gravity powered machines may be like the source of hydroelectric power of the sun, just nearer and in many ways dearer to us.
..
,,These gravity powered machines are special, though you may see machines nearby, I remember engineers are often devising new machines, there is more to be engineered yet, some would say.
...
Einstein believed an electron might increase in mass with time. Experiments to prove if this was so found that old electrons weigh the same as new ones. This seems like the gyrosoope spinning around and not speeding up with time. Like the quanta of the wheel the springs (electrons) stretch but just so much and then no more. If we put two springs like electrons or more common mass on a scale and then tried to power it by gravity if the springs were attached to the base of the machine and the scale there would be no extra power. However if we move them in the field of the gravity unencumbered and balanced by the machine the gravity in a real sense would be independant of the inertial component of the field, this is why the two components of a ballistic arc are independant. They operate at much different wavelengths and energies, otherwise gravity would be exactly the same as inertia. Gravity power machines in essence seem to have the inertia seperate from the gravity with less resistance from the field. We can squeeze power out from a diesel engine, and knowing when in the cycle to find the power is important, no doubt.
..
If like me, you hope to improve the world, Click Here for some Comics by me for creative energy to energise you another way than mere physics.
-
...Unlimited motive power is not uncommon in some machines, gravity is continually squeezing out extra power from the fusion of stars, and hydroelectric power when the machines go online generate power unlimited at low cost, the same for the power of reactors. These machines may be used for motive power of other machines of any type there are, like atomic machines up to giant power plants, with no cost other than wear due to friction. In the future all houses may have a gravity power machine, in storms all the power wires would be improved you see outside (Actually they found a way in 1997 for the fields around the outside the power wires for broadband for the whole country with just one small laser but with no power in the wires anymore, perhaps the greater hazard of the EMF of the wires would also be solved when they remove the wires. With so much power saved and earned by these machines broadband by usual radio waves would be a lot cheaper.).
..
...Gravity powered machines would seem to be completely safe for the environment. The only problem about this may be that the earth will gradually slow down (2079 is always zoomer than we think) so this might be solved by just aim of the machines into the earth's field by a non radial method. Note that these machines would be of worth even if the Earth had no spin, the field would continue squeezing out the heat, so the spin of the Earth is a seperate component of the field and the machines if used wisely would be able to use the power without loss of the spin of the Earth over time. Some have devised rotary machines that would have the two large weights and the weights would rock with more power as they also spin around, the spin of the right type would cancel out the spin otherwise taken from the field. Another way to "save the month hour and year" might be by using the most massive gravity powered machines just in the N. and S where they wouldn't much cancel the spin in the extreme high latitudes and wire most of the power to the S and N.
