Relativistic Wind Tunnel II "Predictions"

 I have some nonrelativistic beliefs about my idea I've named the Relativistic Wind Tunnel..RWT. The RWT would involve using relative motion of light or heavier particles, e.g. to see if we might find the common slowing of time, plus other effects not yet seen though predicted by relativity. The Lorenz contraction has never been seen though we believe it would be there if space and time are more unified in Special Relativity, so if time slows, it's believed the Lorenz Contraction might show up in the RWT. One advantage of RWT is we could start with just a few atoms on the cheap, and then build larger machine as resources allow. And time, or more time may allow it!

 I don't believe in the absoluteness of even Special Relativity, for example, I believe contrary to Einstein's belief that at near the speed of light, a high speed observer wouldn't notice anything unusual on board his ship. I believe the particles may be so polarized and ionized like electrons line up in a high energy field there would be no high energy observer. If the space is empty, large shields wouldn't be needed.

 I believe inertia like centrifugal force radiates outward, so the bottom of the ship in the RWT might be a bit wider than the top. There is no radiance of anything in SR, it's just empty space time.

 I believe with just a few atoms we might find mass induction, even if the radiant field is without electric charge or direct contact. This would be because of interaction with the inertial particles like for centrifugal force pressing against any mass in relative motion. Like the distant light changing its wavelength faster than light to match up the change in speed of the high speed starship, mass induction may be in reach here. One question we may answer with the RWT is why mass induction isn't common for common physics around us. Even if mass induction is for the light, and for high speed masses, I ask why when we feel the pressure of the particles even for gravity or as we move around the room, this would seem to be a form of mass induction, yet by the common definition of mass induction, one mass moving as the other moves by, this isn't seen around us. If we find it in the RWT, at what energy does it stop, and why isn't it more common? Is the mass induction of light only caused by its polarization? If so how much polarization of common mass is needed to cause it?  

 Einstein believed mass isn't electromagnetic, and I believe he was wrong if even neutral particles like the neutron have a higher speed connection by the waves like the EPR to find the plus and minus charge that goes in the 10,000 times more room unoccupied by the quanta inside the atom or other composite mass by spin to be the source of gravity. See my Youtube videos (Encyclopedia Comp Video, see link below). Thus mass is indeed electromagnetic and even so the external light in the RWT doesn't need to have electric charge to create the effects of Special Relativity here because the low energy field interacts reliably with high energy RWT in general to conserve energy.

 Einstein believed all accelerated frames are equivalent, yet if two masses in the inertial acceleration elevator are dropped at time one and two, relative to the accelerating observer at the base of the ship they indeed are seen to move away from each other and the observer on one of these masses will only see the other falling mass in uniform motion, and the force is transformed away by the frame of reference. In the gravitational elevator, the two masses in their rest frame will see acceleration away from each other, and this can't be transformed away in the egravity based elevator nearer to us. This seems to be a reflection of the light in the inertial elevator being constant in speed so the two falling masses are also in uniform motion relative to each other and the light. So the RWT may only fit Special Relativity if the external light is in uniform motion itself. 

 For the RWT only accelerated light changing with time, or perhaps a more self radiant beam here would produce what Einstein thought was the same. You may say, right this is an accelerated frame of reference with accelerating light in the RWT yet acceleration of the masses in Einstein's high speed elevator can be transformed away and this isn't supposed to happen.

If we have two external observers, one "at rest" and another in a second RWT at another "speed" than the one near the "speed of light", the observer at rest will see a different history of the events in the light speed RWT if its temperature is different, influencing other thermodynamic events, It's hot and where are my electric hot socks, neither electric or hot! 

  When the three observers one medium speed relative to the low energy outside light and one with the light moving faster by (change in wavelength of the external light in the machine) and the RWT observer and the rest observer move to one common energy they  find two higher speed sets of RWT events when tney reunite so the observer isn't absolute. The time is more internal not completely controlled by the distant observer.. All three observers would seem to have a different set of events seen on the high speed ship when they match up if Special Relativity is right.. When we see a wheel more oval than round at another angle than a flat tire! The wheel is still round, and proof or disproof of this may be seen with the RWT.

I believe if gravity is faster than light the roundness may be found, because while there is change by the change of the Lorentz transformations, I hold Special Relativity would only be true if it were completely so. A boat in the ocean is with large waves is controlled if we assume what we might want to prove if there was not yet any evidence seen that the weight fields might be unlike the mass field. When we see by the light to see the ship, we see the roundness of the wheels of the wave and the ship.


  
  In relativity, space and time are unified, so we might say if we merely reversed the RWT field direction, by moving backward through space the time would also reverse, but this seems improbable. Therefore relativity seems incomplete, and faster than light might be provable or disprovable in the RWT e.g. by changing the phase of the low energy field or perhaps by another of my ideas, to use small EPR bubbles between entangled particles on the side of the starship in the RWT which may be at the same speed and energy level of resonance as centrifugal force, and so more likely to form a shield to smooth the low energy field that otherwise creates the relativistic resistance to higher speed motion. I originally thought of using magnetic bubbles but these would only seem to give 2x the speed of light for the starship. Like other electromagnetic fields as in centrifugal force with magnetism of the more common type the field isn't removed enough to have the resonance more like a shield.  Perhaps if the field resonates at its own energy the results will be nonrelativistic eventually here also.

 You may say, if the speed of the low energy field is much lighter than light and thus much faster than light by my use of Maxwell's method, we might expect it to be nearly absolute in speed at any rate. If Einstein's low speed quanta only finds this field by "recieved knowledge" and are essentially the complete continuity of the field he believed in so it wouldn't completely fail as he said how can we influence it? Edgar Allen Poe in his mysteries said about codes, any code that can be created can always be reversed by the same process to solve it. So too as you move around the room, the force of the low energy field changes us in a simple way, by resonance with like this bubble method for the starship shield in the RWT, I believe it's possible eventually we might achieve disproof of "Absolute Relativity".

I assume the Low Energy Higgs (LEH) which was predicted and recently proven in the lab would cause pressure like jostling of the light to cause pressure like the Lorenz contraction. Particles have sides and these would cause pressure like gravity as you fall, by moving along with you they exert the force. Einstein believed however in a fundamental way the light never interacts with the inertial elevator so the speed of light is constant. The jostling of the light with the force exerted on it by the LEH might be a way to distinguish GR from my ideas like GWD (General Wave Dynamics). This would be because the light changes its wavelength information long before it reaches the high speed observer if the observer changes their speed. Only if the low energy field is faster than light would this be so.
So too changes in the light added in by the acceleration of the machine might allow signals to be sent to the observer in the lab outside the RWM machine.

What does a starship move relative to? I believe in a combination of Newton's more absolute space time with Einstein's relative motion. This is because by gravity the more massive a body is the slower it tends to move. F=ma seems to be a more general version of E=mc2 and both hold well. So the starship indeed moves relative to the field and it exerts pressure to cause the Lorenz contraction. The round wheel seems flattened relative to lots of observers at different speeds by different amounts yet I believe by the pressure there is also a change in the starship itself that can't be transformed away. The field isn't at absolute rest or motion  but in many different wavelengths and speeds. It gives way easily as Stokes believed with force of long or light duration and exerts strong resistance when the force is strong and quick. It's partially true the motion is relative to the low energy events if you allow that the average history of all the events of gravity and otnet forces are averaged since e.g. tbe sun should have 97% of the angular momentum of the solar system yet it only has about 3% because the early events like the T Tauri phase drained off the spin. So too if you consider the average we might expect to find a general rule and this might allow us to know the starships speed essentially by conservation of energy. The pressure is roundabout but it's there.




Please See Also My Physics Synopsis


Here's My Youtube Video Site Thanks For Listening..

 

  Good News I'm going AUDIO I have been doing about 3 audios a day for the last year. So I have a thousand audios on my machine. Much better than just the 300 I typed over the nine years of my site, YES I would be up to 9000 posts for you in the next 2010 years... what a relief from the drudgery of typing!

I've had to learn how to use audio machines, and my PC had crashed before and the machines cost quite a bit, and so on. For now I'm on Youtube, Encyclopedia Comp Video. Thanks for listening!

 I have 300 comics, 300, inventions I can't publish most of them due to saving for hopeful use and some are like military. The inventions like for general science however will be in reach for you.

  For example one of my favorites this week is uses of a brain interface...

  They record the brainwaves of mice learning in a maze and then give a chemical to forget; when they replay the brainwaves in the "rat's hat" the mice remember, so I think this could be of use for a cheap machine using sensors like zooms and mikes to basically give super hearing and sight to anyone by the interface, with mere software to code the camera and audio to brainwaves by the hat and this as I say uses old tech, real cheap yet it could cure someone like Hellen Keller by also adding a speech synthesis mode and also it could be of worth like for dieters. Augmented Reality AR uses a heads up to make the dish look smaller say they eat lowfat. So I imagine this would be of more worth by like a pleasure button the user would find all the rest of more value than eating!

  You could see in the dark for 10 miles, and see in infrared and through walls with cheap radar, and have super hearing...

 This might be of worth for musicians and artists because "most are deaf or blind". I thought this would be of worth for me with sympathy about typing, thanks! Since over the years all the sites were a eyesight strain. Did you know nobody was nearsighted before the 1600 hundreds because no printed books had eyesquint, so this could save millions from computer eyestrain, this is the fastest growing occupational hazard, cyber overuse injury.

 I've actually achieved an invention a day for many years and you may get some idea of the worth of them since I've only listed the more pure science ones like this due to IP needs. If you would like to help fund my inventions you can reach me at optimist@gmx.com

Thanks for your interest;

Charles

Uses of Superdense Matter

  I originally thought of proton wires, super dense superstrong fibers that would use the NS magnetic adhesion of protons which at close distance would be powered by the strong force binding the lines of force so much it would be a sort of super strong magnetic stuff. Two problems I realized are that if you take say two uranium atoms and unify them by the strong force they become radioactive because of the compression of the strong force and higher mass numbers give more and more instability of the half lives. So proton wires would be a solution here since only the NS NS of the fields would have the force and this would not be so strong to cause radioactivity. Even so the proton wires would have much stronger strength than any alloy by far of mere common electric type seen in the boxes and maps of the US it would take an hour to read on each visit out west! 

 The other problem is that the protons all have + charge and at close distance they would have strong plus charge causing large ions and unstable reactions. Thus I imagined proton wires with an outer electron tube, a sort of continuous atom with 0 electric charge also.

 This would have the density of Uranium and unusual electrical and chemical emanations. What would Sir Issac the alchemist say, I'm dead right while I type real good!


To add its strength to common materials I envision composite with fibers of the wires so it would in general be super strong, yet not so dense. Another advantage might be that the center wire is so dense the tunneling as in some experiments might be considerably faster than light, and this could perhaps be used in computers or communications and so on.

   I was in a hurry when I realized about this and I have lots of good science I find an inspiration. At the time I believed the proton wires might make have such high density they could be used for actually causing strong gravity. Carl Sagan in Cosmos says if we have some material from a dense star and dropped it (and he says laughing on the world processor, one could usually not do otherwise!) it would drop to the center of the earth and not stop, instead being so dense it would go through and then restart to the center from the other shore, and then repeat, punching holes till the friction would stop at the core of the Earth.

   This would have problems with cohesion. Gravity alone can hold neutrons well since the strong force has radioactivity as above, so the neutrons would soon fizzle out also and also decay in a few minutes to the protons and electrons. If we used protons alone they have too much charge also as above. If both of these problems were solved by the proton wire method, I realize that this only can have the density of uranium since the radius of an atom is just about 200 protons across, and superficially this seems the limit due to the geometry of the atom and elements. The protons have a line, how to make them round yet no collapse by the strong force and then radioactive reradiation as above?

   To make denser matter than just uranium, like for research about gravity, then I remembered a ye old 20th century physics volume about the science of super pressure where using anvils like diamonds common solids believed to be incompressible were reduced to 1/3 the volume. I realise this is achieved not by changing the coulomb charges around where the electrons of the atoms swirl, instead of by the quantum wells resistance, the compression seems by the magnetic fields since they aren't quantized and so I think a super dense solid for research about gravity might be achieved as follows; First we take flat crystal leaves of hydrogen based atoms and cool them, a great help in super pressure.Then we compress the atoms NS and they are so close the nuclei are much nearer than usual atoms, the atoms are in tandem with the spheres overlapping. The strong force can't reach to cause instability yet the density is higher than uranium.

 Or the wires could first be made and the charge of the protons reduced by the tube of the electrons. Then the density could be increased a lot by moving the continuous proton wires including the outer continuous cylinder so they overlap along the axis of the wire. The large charge of the protons would be reduced without this or the strong force's influence both protons and neutrons would have in a common atom. Even so the magnetic binding power of the protons would be much stronger than usual electromagnetic fields.

 Because the radius of an atom turns out to be just the same 200 as uranium, the density of this matter is in units of the Uranium. For example carbon with 24 neutrons and protons or just 24 protons' worth would be 24 times the density of the Uranium. Even so since the density is 100 times closer than for Uranium by the inverse second power law of gravity the force of gravity is 24 times 100 X 100 or 240,000 times Uranium. For the amount of protons in tin the force of gravity would be a million times that of Uranium. Larger masses of the solid would have the force multiplied up because of the large number of masses involved. I imagine small blocks of this stuff with supporting structures and by making it in small units it could be shipped and constructed on site for use.

     In my finding about this I looked up about super dense solids, and they have indeed found superdense aluminum that may be of worth to fusion as they say much easier than was believed possible like without radioactivity, and these uses are my own ideas, and I think we might make more of it by using plates and crunching them as above.

  Some have believed in the late 20th century science might use a super solid like this held by an arch above the ground to make enough lift to have 0 gravity near the surface of the Earth, the arch is strong no doubt.

  Super solids like this might be used to measure gravity with higher precision in a version of the usual method of rolling masses down inclined planes except with a small superdense mass so while the gravity is dispersed, the speed it rolls if slowed down be comes much more precise.

  Another use might be a gravity powered drill to go much deeper faster. This could have use in heat fracking and exploring. Uranium is already being researched for reactors so the heat and melting automatically might melt the products of reactors downward solving the problem of what to do with the reactor waste. A faster drill might be of value here too as in cheaper mining.

 Others have imagined that someday we might dig a ditch and then pour molten iron in to send a probe to research the geology below via melting the way down. A super dense matter might not need the ditch or heat to reach the realms below.

  I was unaware that a proton wire fiber would only be as dense as Uranium, so it wouldn't have the more distant use I realized a few years ago, the possibility of making enough of this stuff to drop in wells in masses like asteroids or the moon in order to try to make them hold oceans and an atmosphere. (The atmosphere itself might be gotten by using a laser to nudge a smaller block of star dust and ice, and this would move by a heavier such vaudeville revival, moving a heavier one yet, and we might have a heavy enough icy comet or several to add the water and air like to the moon if the gravity was strong enough, and this would seem a cost effective method of colonizing someday.) Proton wires are no more than uranium and may be of worth in materials science and more but this other type of matter Super Dense Gravitational Nuclear SDGN matter may be of value, making e.g. space stations safer.

 I believe fusion is not impossible, and I've had many ideas to improve the usual fizzle of machines like ITER as in my bestselling site  Reducing Radioactivity that was at the top of the search for about 5 years. If fusion would be in reach, we might someday use it to power heavy gyroscopes to actually change the Earth's spin. The dinosaurs had a weather advantage as I say on my encomputoria site about weather control in that search with a weather paradise on all the land N or S. I believe this may be why the dinosaurs were between endotherms and exotherms, and why no land animal have been so huge since then. All life since then has had the cooler night and cold is usually a fundamental limit to life so though reptiles are in the tropics they are small since even the desert in the tropics is often cool at night a limit the dinosaurs were uninvolved about. The earth was spinning faster then so the temperatures were evened out and faster precession may have allowed the heat to reach the poles even if the sun was at much the same level as heat is today. I believe if our bio rhythms could somehow adapt e.g. by machines like "heads up" we might one day be able to speed up the Earth's day by this or other methods like wires powered by the fusion to change the spin via conservation of momenta and the electric fields of the wires ect. The goal here could be a no winter world for billions of people, and agricultural improvements. This would take adaptation no doubt, but even so it seems interesting and a possible option for the future if our machines are improved.

  Another use of fusion and large gyroscopes might be to stop a future ice age since as I say on my Weather Control site the acceped idea about the ice ages is the 100,000 year cycles, yet there are 250,000 year cycles and 75,000 year cycles that fit in generally yet all the glacial ages fit in exactly with 25,000 year times of starting and stopping, thus by changing the precession in these same cycles we might hope to have influence on the ice ages if needed in some future time.

 My belief about this is that the sun indeed was burning cooler by way of the influence of a comet having impacted the side of Jupiter like perhaps the Great Red Spot, and it's iron rich magnetic influence having damped Jupiter's influence on the sun cooling the Earth, and then the cycles like precession and the general 100,000 year cycles may have modulated it. If not cooler why not all the time since the dinosaurs, and if in cycles how so cooler? Someday via fusion we might send machines to modulate Jupiter's field e.g. by melting the spot or other methods as I say on my site. And fusion power may allow us to perhaps control both causes of the ice ages or indeed to have warm weather year round anywhere there's land.

For More about This Type of Engineering Click Here.

......

The EPR, WSM, Quantum Scattering, and other Considerations for GWD, General Wave Dynamics

First, if you haven't read about GWD here's a brief review of my method of heavy interaction confinement based on relativity for you, and "then more while immediately if in Broad Band"!

 

My mechanism for confinement in QCD involves the electric quanta that always add up to 1 or -1 or zero, by my idea about Maxwell's exact prediction of the speed of light. If the charges are integral, the speed of light is constant also, and special relativity wins (for lower energy and longer range). However Maxwell's idea was that any set density by the quanta will give any speed of the waves. Thus while special relativity holds well for electric quanta, the greater density of the strong force may allow a higher speed, the charges are fractions that average out to about 3/4 so being that much lighter like by Maxwell's speed of move about 1.3 times the speed of light, in agreement with Chao's tunneling experiments. For more about this click here.  MASS ENERGY BY CHAO. 

 If special relativity holds so well at intermediate range and energy where all the forces balance, it may have a strong influence on confinement in QCD. Even while not as strong as QCD in the zone around the outside radius of a heavy particle, to uphold relativity it may become a strong enough influence to control the decays of heavy particles and creation via the influence of relativity.

Inside the electric field relativity is "disproven", yet it always matches up to the speed of light outside, thus no fractional charges are seen outside even though they're possible by simple combinations of the fractional charges (they would have net fractional charge) and other combinations special relativity seems to disprove with no other explanation known why.

All particles known fit the fractional charge method, hundreds of particles and none have fractional charge. This is why physicists accept them as real.



Can the Bubble of Field also be the Cause of The (Einstein Podolsky Rosen) EPR?

Like the strong force, the EPR seems faster than light, and it also seems to have constant force with distance. In QCD this would be because it's held at low energy in the round bag of the electric field, as above. Yet at high energy the bag has the same volume, and is stretched into a tube, the volume of the tube or bag is the same, so the force remains mostly constant. (this dates to the 70's and wasn't my own idea, but fits well with the above.)

My belief is the EPR may be faster than light, by Maxwell's method in GWD. Below a certain energy the field may change phase to a superfluid and suddenly with much lower density it may speed up. CLICK Here For My Synopsis, (GWD/SPEED OF LIGHT) or see my link at upper left of page.  

Here too as in QCD the I think the quantum bubble may be simply an electric charge well, either photons or electrons. By entanglement, the wells are fused and even by moving them apart they're inside the bubble, perhaps more like QCD than QED. Quantum electrodynamics are always outside the bubble so they radiate there. But inside the zone, the force might be more constant with distance. Thus both faster than light and constant EPR force might be explained.

How each particle, "knows" just the other I believe may be by way of a large menagerie of component low energy subparticles each with unique signature that haven't been found yet with high energy experiments.

Because the low energy field like gravity may be nonlinear, an internal acceleration, being mostly nonquantum, thus one input gives 5 unknown types of "random weighted" decay in QM. In GWD the waves are faster than light and overlap to cause the continuous acceleration Einstein hoped to achieve with gravity and the attraction that holds the subatomic physics together also. (The waves of attraction being like with gravity the opposite of the reradiance of the "thermodynamic" speed of light of relativity, would change not just wavelength but also speed in overlapping nonlinear ways.)

Thus the subcomponents are there, even so when a high speed sensing probe hits even so when a high speed sensing probe hits the real particle, the subcomponents aren't seen, "the pool is rocked" and this smooths it out by faster than light acceleration, so much Einstein's continuum seems proven even though there is already considerable evidence he was ultimately wrong. (Prions are simple fractional charge combinations that seem of value, the worth of prions seems that instead there are just the leptons and heavy quarks to combine to make out of Prions, unlike the 300 heavy particles to explain in QCD it's obvious in a few seconds, the prion combination method, devised in the 1970's has value or seems like it. All the known charges, with a paucity of surfeit,  fractional and leptons, are readily made of the building blocks.

 I've proposed slow changes in electrons, perhaps over months or years, to try to map out the low energy field to not "rock the pool" so the signal is seperate from the noise in hopes of finding the subcomponents.

There are some predictions I hope to make with this idea of "Long Range Confinement" LRC to explain the EPR. If QCD has a stretching of the bubble it becomes like a string and starts to resist at more radius. If  the EPR is like this it may not be constant at great enough distance either as has been believed, though not yet proven. New experiments as in with GPS are in hopes of extending the EPR. LRC like confinement seems to imply there might be at least some change with distance.

Second, the "bag or string" being an electric quantum well even if long distance, would perhaps have sides, that is the light or other radiation sent through the lines connecting the EPR particles at right angles to them might show changes in energy. Even if not found right away, this "side of the well" might still be seen (no not booze if no label tastes worse, and worse!) with slow energy probes in months or years as above.



About WSM and EPR

Wave Spherical Mechanics, or Wave Structure of Matter is an idea that says all matter has both in waves and out waves at the speed of light. In GWD gravity being lighter than light might be faster than light might implode, though WSM tells us the waves are standing waves, a combination of the in and out waves. On this WSM page about the EPR Wolff explains the classic 21st century Einstein experiment;

 Two photons are entangled in the center by radioactive decay and radiate to two counters on each side. Changing the angle of one filter seems to change the result of the other in a nonrandom way as if by a connecting signal at faster than light, and the force doesn't seem to change with distance.

 Wolff believes "in" waves, one on each side of the zone where the photons are entangled are being influenced only at the speed of light by the waves on each side moving inward where the detectors are. Thus Wolff interprets the photons measured by filters being already connected by the EPR by the in waves at the speed of light and relativity isn't disproven.

Wolff hopes to shield from the in waves via shields outside the filters, to save WSM and relativity by influence of the in waves before they can change the outward bound entangled photons.

I would think if the in waves at near quantum energy to be merely changed by the filter are there they would have been found by Maxwell and Einstein's time. In GWD there are no in waves other than gravity. There are no out waves except in centrifugal force, the low energy particles have waves between them (Einstein said it's impossible to imagine a fundamental particle that didn't emit and absorb waves.) The particles are small, yet low energy by my use of Einstein's other idea that low energy particles solve the Uncertainty Principle because there are low energy particles like light all around that help us see boxes or cones all around us in the room, like me when I look for my eyewear, not in my power cushion! Without change of large masses like this by light to see, Einstein thought the relative mass of the sensor and what's seen seems arbitrary, he asked, "do you honestly think the moon isn't up there when you look away?" Or hows the life insurance store, not going anywhere real soon!

Thus a change of phase at low energy may make reduced mass yet low energy for the particles. 

The exclusion of the fields may be by the conservation laws, where electromagnetism "disproves" gravity inside and shields the strong force, the strong force then might disprove relativity perhaps by faster than light as in Chao's experiments, this by being with fractional charges a bit lighter than light also being a bit faster than light by the conservation laws.

The small particles that may cause both gravity, the EPR "code" and centrifugal force being not fundamental like the ultimate waves could emit and absorb waves on the outside giving the resilience of Maxwell's medium. They would act like a superfluid as some others think of about gravity and they would exert pressure to cause centrifugal force.

There may be so much room between the zones of particles like heavy mesons or leptons the small "Einstein" particles would flow in the spaces without much friction.
I believed inertia was just a sort of unpowered gravity. Centrifugal force would have just the particles but particles tend to radiate out. Thus gravity may have the extreme high speed in waves with speed as by my hope to reuse Maxwell's method in GWD. The waves being continuous unlike centrifugal force would be needed to hold the world together since the particles being disconnected would radiate out otherwise. The waves are much faster even though they may be tougher to find, though astronomers are already hopeful.

Gravity doesn't shield because the particles would flow around the "real" heavier particles exerting pressure, but like a superfluid it would flow from cold to hot and unify with negative entropy before by pressure the particles would radiate even with gravity. Matter is also highly permeable with this update of La Sages method he used to solve gravity since by negative entropy and flowing in the spaces beween the heavier masses particles it would gain entropy and have negative resistance to the inner motion of the particles..

A problem with centrifugal force would be that it also doesn't shield, e.g. metal plates in experiments. The gravity waves aren't present here to unify. This is why Einstein's particle might also need to emit and absorb waves of its own. If you have a field of the particles and you spin the wheel, how do the particles near the center know to radiate out?

 With Einstein's relativity, there was a revival of Mach's ideas about inertia; if you have a spinning wheel or bucket, somehow all the cosmos is connected up and the bucket "knows" to have concave water when in acceleration. (Though this is about relativity of motion in GWD there is motion (Why, Why not?) though with gravity and mass, the heavier mass tends to be more at rest and has less and less motion and's more valid.)

The connection only shows up during acceleration and can't be gravity, it's far too weak. A tiny centrifuge can have billions of g's.

 Thus by way of Maxwell's resilient medium, the particles of inertia and centrifugal force are attractive with outer waves and the inner "Einstein" particle also may exert pressure of the force. The wheel starts spinning and the NS of the particles might connect them in tiny streams or bands like magnetic fields. The ones on the outside might radiate out and draw more in to out, (with simple complexity!) and the outer flow would cause the force. By field exclusion, the Einsteins might flow also like gravity in the spaces between the heavy particles. (Field exclusion may be important to all forces; without it there would be infinite implosion.)

In this model, centrifugal force doesn't shield even though it's radiant unlike gravity because these low energy motes have waves between them, and they are excluded from the dense fields in GWD so while they exert pressure of centrifugal force unlike gravity they also have low positive or negative entropy (friction) in this possible way of centrifugal force.


By the general (not exact) equivalence of gravity and inertia, in GWD if gravity doesn't shield neither does inertia because they're generally the same but also distinct since, e.g. the equation for centrifugal force is much unlike gravity (mass in the only thing they have in common, yet two masses for gravity and just one for centrifugal force. "If it's relative like Einstein believed, this one mass is relative to what? Not the rest of the cosmos, just the flow of the field near it.")

The particle would be what make gravity and inertia seem the same as Einstein believed, yet the high speed wave would be why the distinctions are also numerous. Gravity would be like a long range bubble and inertia is like the "electromagnetic" speed of light being shorter range and contained within the gravity; in GWD inertia is contained in gravity, and thus if inertia is generally at any rate like gravity and gravity accelerates, a large component of the acceleration may be because of the resilient Einstein particles, even so, acceleration (only) may change then by way of conservation of linear and angular momentum. If this field of particles has neither positive or negative net entropy this would be how it can exert centrifugal pressure yet not shield as if by pressure or friction.

There is positive entropy if you go up the superhighway and these particles were being ploughed through by your boat, not if pushing the van! There's no wave on the opposite side of the SUV's in the other lane since the net entropy is low, a Promethean form changing method of finding better than mythology..


You start the cosmic elevator like Einstein so often used to lift his methods and the push is felt yet once you stop the machine it disappears. Actually I believe the entropyis  there (to e.g. cause particle spin by acceleration) it may be merely below the quantum level of like the light operating "inside relativity" or also outside it, there are real forces (not just inertial pseudo forces) in all physics or  the fields would stop moving.

 Relativity seems about "the vain appearances of light" to me. GWD seems more complete, until or if disproven, while beauty is real,  acceleration to change of wavelength (momentum, thus speed of light in a nontrivial sense in relativity) are not to be discounted either.

Storm Based Proton Fusion, and Electron Polar Fusion

  What powers thunderstorms? I believe that lining up the fields may be the cause of what by others are named Low Energy Nuclear Reactions. Thunderstorms and lightning,have been found recently to have more energy than even a solar flare.One explanation has been devised, that the proton and electrons of atoms are ionized leaving neutrons. These then move into the radioactive atoms always present naturally in the air in the thunderstorm, and in this explanation related to Cold Fusion their radioactivity is primed by the neutrons releasing lots of energy. The power of lightning is indeed about 2 ktons per bolt, and we might expect some sort of radioactivity to be the cause.

 Unlike in other methods of explaining storms, lightning is linear and it would reverse the bolts above to below 20 times per second as seen with some lighting. By lining up the NS of each proton merely by reversing the NS orientation of the ions, my idea Storm Based Proton Fusion (SBPF) would allow the power itself to be generated inside the bolts. First the leader stroke would be aligned by the NS alignment more than before, then with protons or atoms of valence inside where the bolt would be aligned, the electrons would run down this zone, competing the circuit. Due to couloumb forces and the general randomness of the field lines, the number of protons that would fuse would be small, as the nuclear reactions though strong, are still "low energy". Once two protons or ions would fuse, being mostly at right angles, the neutrons and positrons moving outward would explain why storms are indeed with associated  neutron radiation. As the protons would implode via the magnetic fields with less resistance than the quantized electric fields at right angles, they would radiate the neutrons at right angles to the bolt, while the implosion powered by the strong force would also draw near the protons beside them and this could strengthen the flow of the electron current on the outside of the bolt. And the N and S magnetic fields here may also like a one way valve for each fusion implosion, strengthening the magnetic fields of the protons in the line of the bolt and thus the electron current outside. The channel is the same for the numerous cycles of the lightning so the same charges would be used for each discharge, this is how I got the idea the poles of the same protons might have a simple reversal of the magnetic heavy protons (the protons if heavier also stay more stable with each bolt so the channel is with "reruns of the weather station!" 

The Curie limit common to higher temperature physics might be overcome if  the inner magnetic field of the protons are also much stronger. High energy particles like electrons align their spins with a strong field.

The protons are near enough to fuse some times, say 1 in 100, the power source of the lightning, while instability and couloumb forces would limit a complete chain reaction like Low Energy Radioactivity with the protons at more distance than most would fuse.  

 There is no other known explanation for how lightning works, Low Energy and the Lorentz method of relativistic resonance are used only with radiation deep inside the storm. One problem with relativistic electrons is how they could move through the solid wall of rain often seen in storms. Protons or ions are more solid and "inside the water." I think it's possible a combination of the Lorentz method for the general electric cloud and then the fusion for the bolts to discharge the charge might be the cause. On the other hand SBPF could power and amplify the cloud not vice versa. It's already known that the Lorentz method is not enough energy to be the cause of lightning. Actually most lightning is inside the cloud while neither of these methods would be the cause of linear lighting outside it, electrons and heavy particles would naturally radiate outward and the linear bolts outside the cloud or the cause of the line of the flow would be otherwise unknown. The bolts are linear and narrow. For the return bolt the charges would reverse to SN and the electrons would then flow in the opposite direction, with more and more of the charge in the cloud used up in each loop. Low Energy Nuclear to me seems radiant like a sphere since it seems to be"glorified radioactivity"; there seems to be unlimited radioactive air available, and would lead to unlimited explosion of the storm, even outside the bolt. By only being able to reach ignition inside the zone of heat like the tokamak the fusion would be limited and not reach the zone outside the bolt. This is the same reason why the tokamak and other machines fail to sustain the reaction and why the Low Energy reaction method seems less of worth than SBPF. A simple way to prove this explanation of overcoming the Coulomb forces as the scientists who found Cold Fusion believed, may be by a simple force exerted on aligned protons, either by collision or anvils like in the Low Energy Reaction method where the atoms are so close they may fuse, if there is more energy released than by common physics this may prove my idea..

One thing about this if true is that fusion like this would be messier than another type of fusion I have named Electron Fusion EF. Electrons might be of use, much easier to find than protons or uranium, by  moving them to fuse NS NS. There would be no fusion byproducts like with the strong force. I assume since electrons don't explode, there's more holding them together than the force outward, thus it seems we might be able to unify them to fuse for the nonquantized adhesion of the magnetic fields which would help not resist the reaction..

Lightning tubes have been devised that have all the effects of lightning yet at 1/100 the power. This idea of how lightning works will be easy to find at higher energy where all the voltage in the lab machine isn't input. Fusion via lasers is common in machines like ITER, the problem is about it fizzling out. The way lightning may be different may in SBPF be about the NS alignment where the outer electron zone moves the protons together by the ions and there are more of the zones powering the lightning.