Relativistic Wind Tunnel II "Predictions"

 I have some nonrelativistic beliefs about my idea I've named the Relativistic Wind Tunnel..RWT. The RWT would involve using relative motion of light or heavier particles, e.g. to see if we might find the common slowing of time, plus other effects not yet seen though predicted by relativity. The Lorenz contraction has never been seen though we believe it would be there if space and time are more unified in Special Relativity, so if time slows, it's believed the Lorenz Contraction might show up in the RWT. One advantage of RWT is we could start with just a few atoms on the cheap, and then build larger machine as resources allow. And time, or more time may allow it!

 I don't believe in the absoluteness of even Special Relativity, for example, I believe contrary to Einstein's belief that at near the speed of light, a high speed observer wouldn't notice anything unusual on board his ship. I believe the particles may be so polarized and ionized like electrons line up in a high energy field there would be no high energy observer. If the space is empty, large shields wouldn't be needed.

 I believe inertia like centrifugal force radiates outward, so the bottom of the ship in the RWT might be a bit wider than the top. There is no radiance of anything in SR, it's just empty space time.

 I believe with just a few atoms we might find mass induction, even if the radiant field is without electric charge or direct contact. This would be because of interaction with the inertial particles like for centrifugal force pressing against any mass in relative motion. Like the distant light changing its wavelength faster than light to match up the change in speed of the high speed starship, mass induction may be in reach here. One question we may answer with the RWT is why mass induction isn't common for common physics around us. Even if mass induction is for the light, and for high speed masses, I ask why when we feel the pressure of the particles even for gravity or as we move around the room, this would seem to be a form of mass induction, yet by the common definition of mass induction, one mass moving as the other moves by, this isn't seen around us. If we find it in the RWT, at what energy does it stop, and why isn't it more common? Is the mass induction of light only caused by its polarization? If so how much polarization of common mass is needed to cause it?  

 Einstein believed mass isn't electromagnetic, and I believe he was wrong if even neutral particles like the neutron have a higher speed connection by the waves like the EPR to find the plus and minus charge that goes in the 10,000 times more room unoccupied by the quanta inside the atom or other composite mass by spin to be the source of gravity. See my Youtube videos (Encyclopedia Comp Video, see link below). Thus mass is indeed electromagnetic and even so the external light in the RWT doesn't need to have electric charge to create the effects of Special Relativity here because the low energy field interacts reliably with high energy RWT in general to conserve energy.

 Einstein believed all accelerated frames are equivalent, yet if two masses in the inertial acceleration elevator are dropped at time one and two, relative to the accelerating observer at the base of the ship they indeed are seen to move away from each other and the observer on one of these masses will only see the other falling mass in uniform motion, and the force is transformed away by the frame of reference. In the gravitational elevator, the two masses in their rest frame will see acceleration away from each other, and this can't be transformed away in the egravity based elevator nearer to us. This seems to be a reflection of the light in the inertial elevator being constant in speed so the two falling masses are also in uniform motion relative to each other and the light. So the RWT may only fit Special Relativity if the external light is in uniform motion itself. 

 For the RWT only accelerated light changing with time, or perhaps a more self radiant beam here would produce what Einstein thought was the same. You may say, right this is an accelerated frame of reference with accelerating light in the RWT yet acceleration of the masses in Einstein's high speed elevator can be transformed away and this isn't supposed to happen.

If we have two external observers, one "at rest" and another in a second RWT at another "speed" than the one near the "speed of light", the observer at rest will see a different history of the events in the light speed RWT if its temperature is different, influencing other thermodynamic events, It's hot and where are my electric hot socks, neither electric or hot! 

  When the three observers one medium speed relative to the low energy outside light and one with the light moving faster by (change in wavelength of the external light in the machine) and the RWT observer and the rest observer move to one common energy they  find two higher speed sets of RWT events when tney reunite so the observer isn't absolute. The time is more internal not completely controlled by the distant observer.. All three observers would seem to have a different set of events seen on the high speed ship when they match up if Special Relativity is right.. When we see a wheel more oval than round at another angle than a flat tire! The wheel is still round, and proof or disproof of this may be seen with the RWT.

I believe if gravity is faster than light the roundness may be found, because while there is change by the change of the Lorentz transformations, I hold Special Relativity would only be true if it were completely so. A boat in the ocean is with large waves is controlled if we assume what we might want to prove if there was not yet any evidence seen that the weight fields might be unlike the mass field. When we see by the light to see the ship, we see the roundness of the wheels of the wave and the ship.


  
  In relativity, space and time are unified, so we might say if we merely reversed the RWT field direction, by moving backward through space the time would also reverse, but this seems improbable. Therefore relativity seems incomplete, and faster than light might be provable or disprovable in the RWT e.g. by changing the phase of the low energy field or perhaps by another of my ideas, to use small EPR bubbles between entangled particles on the side of the starship in the RWT which may be at the same speed and energy level of resonance as centrifugal force, and so more likely to form a shield to smooth the low energy field that otherwise creates the relativistic resistance to higher speed motion. I originally thought of using magnetic bubbles but these would only seem to give 2x the speed of light for the starship. Like other electromagnetic fields as in centrifugal force with magnetism of the more common type the field isn't removed enough to have the resonance more like a shield.  Perhaps if the field resonates at its own energy the results will be nonrelativistic eventually here also.

 You may say, if the speed of the low energy field is much lighter than light and thus much faster than light by my use of Maxwell's method, we might expect it to be nearly absolute in speed at any rate. If Einstein's low speed quanta only finds this field by "recieved knowledge" and are essentially the complete continuity of the field he believed in so it wouldn't completely fail as he said how can we influence it? Edgar Allen Poe in his mysteries said about codes, any code that can be created can always be reversed by the same process to solve it. So too as you move around the room, the force of the low energy field changes us in a simple way, by resonance with like this bubble method for the starship shield in the RWT, I believe it's possible eventually we might achieve disproof of "Absolute Relativity".

I assume the Low Energy Higgs (LEH) which was predicted and recently proven in the lab would cause pressure like jostling of the light to cause pressure like the Lorenz contraction. Particles have sides and these would cause pressure like gravity as you fall, by moving along with you they exert the force. Einstein believed however in a fundamental way the light never interacts with the inertial elevator so the speed of light is constant. The jostling of the light with the force exerted on it by the LEH might be a way to distinguish GR from my ideas like GWD (General Wave Dynamics). This would be because the light changes its wavelength information long before it reaches the high speed observer if the observer changes their speed. Only if the low energy field is faster than light would this be so.
So too changes in the light added in by the acceleration of the machine might allow signals to be sent to the observer in the lab outside the RWM machine.

What does a starship move relative to? I believe in a combination of Newton's more absolute space time with Einstein's relative motion. This is because by gravity the more massive a body is the slower it tends to move. F=ma seems to be a more general version of E=mc2 and both hold well. So the starship indeed moves relative to the field and it exerts pressure to cause the Lorenz contraction. The round wheel seems flattened relative to lots of observers at different speeds by different amounts yet I believe by the pressure there is also a change in the starship itself that can't be transformed away. The field isn't at absolute rest or motion  but in many different wavelengths and speeds. It gives way easily as Stokes believed with force of long or light duration and exerts strong resistance when the force is strong and quick. It's partially true the motion is relative to the low energy events if you allow that the average history of all the events of gravity and otnet forces are averaged since e.g. tbe sun should have 97% of the angular momentum of the solar system yet it only has about 3% because the early events like the T Tauri phase drained off the spin. So too if you consider the average we might expect to find a general rule and this might allow us to know the starships speed essentially by conservation of energy. The pressure is roundabout but it's there.




Please See Also My Physics Synopsis


Here's My Youtube Video Site Thanks For Listening..