The Northwest Passage and the Panama Canal
..
With the advent of global warming, the possibility of opening up a NW Passage for shipping may become more than just history. Far from being thrilled by the discovery of the New World in 1492, European mariners considered it a stop across the road to Asia around South America. They would always say the US and Latin America and Canada are what makes the old world go round!

If the N may warm up anyway we may be able to speed up the process if it's of value. (Global warming may be actually caused by the sun burning hotter, the solar cycles are at their most heat in all the known science, and when the solar heat increases so does the heat on mars and worlds like Neptune, so solar warming may be safe because the sun hasn't overheated in the history of life more about this.. For a link about the atmospheric changes of the earth, Click here..) Using combinations (or a combination of just the cosmos!) of mirrors, inflatable lenses, refracting shades, or magnetic bubbles, heat and light would be focused in a narrow 100 mile wide band ice free, this may be a way to have the NW Passage ahead of global warming, of great import for the world economy. The fourth option above, magnetic bubbles, is based on the new science that uses a machine like a magnet to make a cheap magnetic field or bubble, this is being researched to use as a giant solar sail. When the bubble is farther from the sun, it expands and this makes it go at the same speed, so it takes no extra sails at greater distances from the sun, the perfect machine to move a space satellite in and about the solar system. Because the solar sail is a round loop, it may be used if modulated in the right shape more a lense to focus the heat along the path of the NW passage. And part of the heat the field collects can be used (not sued if mom's a good lawyer!) to power the bubble generator machine also. If this plan works out well, it might in the offing be scaled up to heat Russia, Canada, and Alaska, (Canadians are cozy about global warming!)

While some would say this is bad for wildlife, the environment may be safe mostly. Biologists say life is adapting rapidly to the changes in the weather. After all there were perhaps 20 ice ages in recent time (2 million years) and we have a bit of an ice age, named Christmas. Times of warm weather aren't uncommon to life, for millions of years after the dinosaurs, there was warm weather for mammals, warmer than the ice ages and during the interglacial ages hippopotamuses were as far north as N Europe.

The Panama Canal

If the NW Passage plan is inevitable, or just for more options, the Panama canal might be improved for supertankers by a large oil pipe or pipes over the hills of the canal and using the siphon of the oil from one ship to the other. Larger ships can't go through the canal, and in the 30 years from about 1978 it's been cheaper overall to send the oil and other such goods around SA than via the canal. It would be more optimal yet if they had the pipeline because it would be faster. The ships would have to be in sets one each east and west, and without loading something in the ship they would be like me in the bus and take 5/4 of a visit, or sitting at the bus start, it's an action adventure reality show, I never miss the bus, I go by office box!) The big business could afford to have sets of ships in both shores, and this would be where there would be the most to win via the pipeline. Another possibility is to dig a tunnel the width of the inter-modal freight containers slightly above sea level. The ships with all the containers (not oil) would unload fast by machine and the containers would move by motors and a cushion of air around the containers so there would be no collisions. High speed machines on both sides could unload and load the containers. (They say about 30,000 of these are accidentally dropped into the ocean each year, often with ill results, in other science this might be solved by making each container a sort of miniature boat with it's own flotation device and propulsion to make it to the shore, or at least a gps the owners could use to find these valuable containers and retrieve them, or they might be wave powered to reach the owner just 1/3 more slowly but of worth to return. The first boats other than a few to make it through the NW Passage were actually bathtub soaps, they were dropped out of an intermodal container and they went year by year as the ice froze and thawed all the way from the N around Alaska and Greenland and then south to the East coast of the US in a few years.)

A third possibility to make passage of the Panama canal for big ships is to actually make the boats modular. The ship would arrive at the canal and divide into 10 ships and these would go through the canal one by one and then reunite on the other side. This way much larger ships could go through the canal!


A History of The NW Passage


Working for the English Henry Hudson in 1610 sailed the ship Discovery into Hudson Bay where her was frozen in for the winter. Provisions ran out and his men mutinied and cast him, his young son and seven loyal sailors adrift in a small boat. They were never seen again. Or in other words he's a sort of famous Santa Clause in a cosmic rowing machine to the stars!


In 1771 Samuel Hearne of the Hudson Bay Company left Fort Prince of Wales and marched north across the grim Canadian Barrens to the north of the Coppermine River at the northern edge of the North American continent. He proved that no northwest passage cut across the North American continent.
They looked out over the land and they knew it was him when he returned in giant fuzzy slippers!


The sea Capt. James Cook in 1771 rounded the northern shore of Alaska's W coast and reported that no passage existed on the Pacific shore S of 70 degrees, (not the heatwave!) and that the N above this is ice choked and inevitable for commerce. How can't we you feel our way around the world?

In 1845 John Franklin sailed with 130 officers and men. The ships carried china, crystal, silver, a library and an old music machine, but no Arctic wear and little understanding of Arctic survival. By 1847 a worried Royal Navy began to dispatch rescue expeditions. In the next nine years, 40 expeditions crisscrossed the Arctic looking for Franklin. Though they never found the lost party, relief expeditions mapped vast stretches of the Canadian Arctic. They found the information, and neither the information or Franklin was buried in a memorial service!

In the late 1980's a Smithsonian funded search found Franklin's body and the boats, right where his wife had always said they would find him, SOUTH IN THE HEAT!

A US based atomic submarine made the first underwater transit of the NW Passage in 1960, Why? Like Columbus, to make it to the other zhenzhou!

The New Super Clean Machines ...

The new bacteria in hospitals and doctors' offices are resistant to antibiotics. A hundred thousand people a year die of these what I would call "actually not so super" bugs. Getting medical care is more hazardous than going on an airplane. Elevators are safer yet, I see this sign with a sideways arrow that says ELEVATOR, maybe it's a sideways elevator! Perhaps hospital rooms of the future will be auto clean, and so will be machines in them. There are more ways to clean than just soap. The trick is to make a room clean with a strong enough or smart enough cleaner to stop the bacillus without harm to the patients. Soon there may be computerized cleansers rather like giant scrubbing bubbles in most hospital rooms. There are now small toy vehicles that use a built in fan to add air pressure enough you can actually drive the RC machine up the wall and even on the roof, so dry cleaning machines of this type may reach all the room, floor walls and roof if of worth. A good way to clean that stops almost all life of any kind is to take away food, water, and cool the air. I used to use chemicals to stop bees in my house but this is more effective, cleaner, costs nothing, and is safer than calling the exterminator. Each scrubbing machine could have scanners that would bounce lasers off the floors or other surfaces to be cleaned. As these are envisioned they would sense and remove any food, water, or microbes of the type between the beam and the sensor, to clean and search for the bacillises at the same time. A major problem with cleansing hospital rooms is that many of the germs and viruses are inside the patient or doctor and nurse. Using lasers inside the body may also clean here too in a sort of laser light show where the light lights by combination with other lasers up only after travel inside the body, using no incision with higher efficiency. YYYYYClick Here YYYYYFor More>>>> Laser Surgery Via Antibiodies To Find and Remove Harmful Cells. Other ways to clean rooms by machine are being researched such as to use an always up laminar draft of air from the floor. This flow of the air would carry the microbes only upward and away from the persons and once above the head of poeple in the room, the lasers and actuation machines above would then zap all the germs there without risk of laser harm to the people in the rooms. The rooms may be simple so all the surfaces are minimal and smooth, with molecule wide or broader rollers that make the outside of the plate or floor tile that when flipped to the other side are zapped by lasers inside the shelf or below the floor and then revolved to another cycle of cleansing. Exobiologists say that the compounds of life they see in astronomy and thus probably life itself can't exist without a surface. In hospital rooms in addition to all the cleaning all the beds may have electric blankets so while the patients are cozy and have the right temperature always, the microbes in the room around them with neither food or water from the scrubbing robots would also be reduced by the room temperature overnight. Obviously if to seal off all food and water and turn down the air conditioner may even stop a type of life like bees that have been on earth for 100s of millions of years and resistant, it may be of worth for other types of clean. Since they would want to stay in the cozy hospital bed in the cool room, patients might even have power beds with controls so they could drive up the health food snack machine (I'm serious! All they have in the ER in my town is fat and chips) or go for a nurse visit just for a suprise and a fun visit she may like! Don't call us we'll yell for you!

The hospital of 2079 (my mom the prof's hatband size!) may have Blood pressure cuffs to auto cleanse, this has already been done with many types of machines. Schicks are self sharpening, self assembled machines that make unlimited copies of the machines, the machines, the machines...! and so on, such as the bathroom tiles that use light and embedded compounds to always make them safe about microbes, and other recent inventions I've seen include a sleeping bag that's cleansing by using body heat and compounds to refresh the cloth of the bed while you sleep. So like many smart machines like arches of roofs or bridges that automatically strengthen in an earthquake, self cleaning machines in offices and hospitals may become common. No doubt since people who live in unsheltered conditions have stronger immune systems because they are strong with more exercise to immunity than our immune systems receive, the best bet may be to kill the super bacillus but also also to take more active steps (Pasteur said in his last breath, the amoeba is out, the world is in). The best way in general may be to build up and flex and program our body's natural immune activities, with small small treadmill aerobic machines of like size of the amobea no doubt.. So to stop the super bugs for these times while programming our body for the worst of them, and reducing them too to like the outdoors where they can't evolve so much, may be a good defence for us, they can't win the war without knowing about the terrain.

And no doubt another good way to defend against viruses and other bugs may be to engineer "good" germs and "good" viruses that are harmless to us to defend and clean the rooms for us, sort of like a small but powerful bodyguard for us when in the realm of the most danger. Good germs could be engineered to defend against many illnesses, one for sinusitus, one for good oral care, one for the ears, and so on, sort of a modular immune system you could add in and remove once cured. With illnesses like sinusitis or prostatitis good GE germs may be of special worth because they can climb into realms otherwise unreachable without surgery (these are where the immune system can't reach) and would cleanse so well it may cure many types of illness. To remove the good germs once cured, other good germs that would automatically metabolize out the cleansing germs and carry in more of evolution's own replacement cells might be used. This would be a bit unsafe no doubt with risk of mutation though small, but it might be far cheaper and more of worth than surgery. With the current state of health science as it is Sinusitis can cause severe incurabale pain, so the advantages of this method for many types of septic illness may outweigh the risks.

Machines that clean out allergens or other special machines like for clean rooms may soon be on the market, a related computerized laser cleaning motif.
-

A Much Higher Octane Diesel Engine! The Tokamak

Designs of fusion reactors like the Tokamak hope to use a magnetic field to enclose high energy electrons and protons, others try to use the inertia of the fuel to stabilize the implosion of lasers like the inertia in fusion implosion so much the protons have no where to go and implode. The problem is these reactors have instability of the surrounding field, so the magnetic bottles they have are more like a leaky gas bag. The nearest the best magnetic bottle has gotten to fusion needs about 25 times more pressure than they have. This is with high temperatures of the fuel assumed to be necessary to generate the reaction. Trying to confine a ball of hot gas with another gas seems to be improbable, air is an air leak no doubt. Another possibility than air for air has been devised that may be more viable may be by mechanical compression of the gas, by way of counterbalancing cylinders. Each set of cylinders and cylinder blocks would have the shape of a cylinder and half sphere on the ends that mesh tightly so first the fuel would be in a more oval shaped room with rounded ends, on compression the cylinders at the maximum compression would be with the plasma shaped like a sphere, so more stable by the physics. The inner walls would be with many positive charges of atoms imbedded in the cylinder face at regular intervals so the positive field of the cylinder walls would also be more leveled all the way around to compress the fuel of protons. To reduce instability more, lower temperatures would be used, this would be like a diesel engine compared to gasoline powered; the fuel may ignite more by internal pressure and heat so it would be more stable while with lower temperature up to the ignition point. The discoverer of dry ice, Bridgeman, found that water remains frozen even at high temperature if the pressure is also raised. Another way to reduce instability is by focusing of the fields of the magnetic fields of the cylinder walls so they would extend just a short distance this would reduce the instability the longer distance fields of the magnetic bubbles would have. If the fuel is too hot a surrounding area of field might be used; to boost the stability to add more force the solid outer shell to power the reaction would be of worth to increase the probability of fusion and inside this a minimal but strong layer of field would move the force from the cylinder to the compression of the fuel more reliably. Coolant like electric cooling might be also used to cool the cylinder after each power cycle using some of the power of the fusion to power the cooling. To actuate the buffer field high speed sensors and actuators would be used to actively stabilize the field. This may be especially of worth with the use of smaller cylinders and fields since with reduced field to control it's more reliable.

The two cylinders on each side of the pairs of counteracting machines would be sealed by a sort of magnetic flange of many rings of the width of the cylinder of the two pistons so none of the fuel could leak out. With no leaks and more balanced pressure instability would also be minimized.

There are the two sets of cylinders in this lottery machine of the star in a jar so that when one compresses and has fusion it expands and then this expansion on one side of the machine is transferred to power by a strong beam perhaps of large size and a strong lever arm to cause the compression of the other piston in its pressure phase. This way part of the pressure cycle is used to power the next boost.

Like an engine of a road machine if more pressure is needed to make the reaction go a spark might be used for extra atomic power, this would be used in more optimal ratio or just to add more pressure and not so much heat up to the point when the maximum pressure was achieved. The spark would be a sort of atomic spark plug that would be perhaps a bit of Uranium that would be hit by a laser on one side of the cylinder.

25 times the pressure is not that much by these methods to achieve because you can exert much more pressure with a solid than just with air and much of the problem of the bubbles is about instability, not pressure. If the instability and the pressure are both overpowered by these methods, this will make fusion more like fusion was always imagined to be in the old movies about science and life of the year 2000, all the reruns have 0-0-0 at Christma like St. Clause in B.C!

To improve pressure without so much heat is by use of physics of the mighty ant about strength of materials. The ant can lift a huge amount of mass and throw it far; if humans could do this it would be like throwing the mass 20 miles as they say in Amazing Sci Amer. So too a gyroscope generates the most force at smaller distances because the strength of the machine is most at closer distances where much higher rpms are reached. While temperature is heat per unit of mass, heat is not the same. So if you felt the heat mass has around the outside of Jupiter it wouldn't feel hot even though it has higher heat than the solar power of the sun. Each molecule moves fast in the mostly empty space but there are not many of them. And the space shuttle tiles are so radiant they can be real hot and not burn your hand. Pressure can be much larger if the surface area is decreased without melting the machine. Thus a smaller piston of the fusion machine may be both of more worth because of it's ability to exert more than the 25 times the pressure, and because of it's reduced heat which won't multiply up each surrounding atom's heat or instability without so many atoms. The uses of magnetic fields to hold the fuel was originally thought to be of worth because the high heat of the fusion would seem to melt any metal walls. The metal walls are still there in the Tokamak but they are removed away and the confining magnetic bubble is between the walls and the fuel. The use of more powerful, but nearer and more stable and actuated fields may help.

The problem of the smaller heat output of a smaller piston would be solved just by using more pistons on each side in even numbered sets. Smaller cylinders also would reduce leaks by use of the smaller magnetic field in R&D, it would be easier in simulations and use to find where leaks would develop and control them more reliably.

All this will help increase our bet of this vast source of safe power on a large scale. Typically heavier atomic nucleii would be used of positive and negative valence that would align by the strong electric field of the pistons so it would be more probable the poles of the protons would implode to the poles of the neutrons, fusing both by pressure and the strong force without having to overpower the centrifugal force of each random alignment of the non polarized field of the Tokamak. Another way to safe atomic power may be lining up protons in the N S, N S poles in a wire and draining off the spin by a beam on the side of the limb of the wire thus formed with a complete loop of electric field all the way around to collect the atomic power converted to electric. This I name the Atomic Motor. It would take nano engineering we don't have yet and may not be as efficient, so compression of the fuel may be more of worth in the near physics. More mass would be converted to energy with compresssion.

-

Are Gravity Powered Machines Good Physics?

....

...There are patents on them, but do they work without violation of energy conservation? These machines are sort of like a bucket and a weight on a boom, the balance makes it so they lift even "old energy" in the pail, and this is an ancient machine used in egypt to lift the nile of 3000 BC awhile. A gravity powered machine now in use has weights on both ends of a boom. This is rather like power steering when you go out for a whirl in your Chevy, you have the forces the same on either side, so it just takes a bit of force to move the column. If you put a machine to generate electricity powered by the tires side to side motion, the force could be used to achieve work if the balance of the pressure of the fluid in the power steering were cheap (I just wave my hand on the wheel when a goddess jogs past, and when she'll gossip awhile, I'm strong to lift her a bit via just saying hi!) With the gravity powered machine instead of constant power of the power steering used to cause the multiplied force of the machine, it's replaced by gravity. Even so gravity is unlike the balanced hydraulic pressure of power steering because it never runs out of power and balance of the forces. So if you had two weights on both sides and each weighs 1000 lbs it seems it would be of worth to use that balance like with the power steering wheel to move a machine to do work. (Inertia would be more but this would just be solved by slowing the machine.)

-

...This is easy to prove just with a simple experiment, if you use use a beam with holes or other like clamps that hold two pound exercise brightbells looped in the sidewise beam on the side of a pivot like a sawhorse and another beam of comparable mass to the weights of like wood of 2 or 3 ft broad above the machine, when you have the weights you can lift one of them just by moving your center of mass towards it, and once the mass is removed at the top if at the same time the center of mass is moved to the other weight, it's easier to balance also, this is much easier than lifting the weight, it's why machines like this are used instead of lifting 1000 lbs by hand. You'll see the weight is much easier to lift with the boom on top than without by just moving the center of mass when you load, and it's easy to balance the machine for a reload just by moving the center of mass because the boom of wood adds force like the wheel power to multiply up the power. The main point here is that if you first lift and drop the weight with the other, and then add another moderately heavy beam to lift the same weight, you'll notice it's much easier! And to move the center of balance of the machine to relift the weight takes reduced labor where the machine has a roller and is in balance. This is how gravity power machines multiply up the mechanical advantage. If you had two 5000 lb weights and you try to lift five pounds this is much easier than if you lift five pounds without the machine, just as if you put a weight by the side of a wheel and move it by power steering (don't try this at 100 mph!) it would be much easier to move from where you, in the editors sofa and not asleep at the wheel control by small motion than with a van without power steering, as in the experiment. Instead of the force of the power steering causing the balance of the wheels, the force of gravity is used with the two weights, and this would be caused by the pressure of the flow of the particles of the field, a more inexaustable power source than the power steering. (I think it's even possible the field itself may never run out of energy, for why and how, click here..) Whatever the cause of the flow if it exerts pressure to cause the machine to multiply up, this like the flow of other fields may be useful if tapped, a sort of hydroelectric power flow. With these machines each stamping motion generates force that also lifts the machine to the next stamp on the other side. The egyptian machine they use to this day (the bucket and boom and weight) could be used for power of this via combining it with a turbine by lifting water or other stuff in the bucket, dropping it in a turbine for power and while the beam is at rest at a higher level the pivot of the machine is moved to where the empty bucket and the weight balance by the weight of the beam. By letting both bucket and weight rest while moving the pivot, more advantage is gotten each time the bucket is raised or lowered enough to achieve extra power. A bucket and boom could operate by no other means if this were untrue. This may seem to violate energy conservation, but if there were not more power gotten out than we put in, this machine would be out of use and all sorts of machines like levers or machines of other types would not be in use.

...

Say you have two buckets of liquid stuff, one one liter and one two liters. If the weight of the beam (the force multiplier) is 1 on each side, the weight on one side is 2 an on the other side is 3, and the ratio is 3/2 or 60%. If the weight of the beam is much raised to 100 on both sides, the ratio to lift the bucket is 102/101 or about 1%. And once the heavy bucket has been lifted and emptied to equal the 1 liter jug, they both weigh the same to lower it down to reload. The weight of the extra one liter is all of the liter, so the cost of lifting it has been reduced by almost 60%, and the more weight is put on the beam the more power is saved, and the rebound these machines use with with each stamp and optimally moving the lever arm makes the savings more by using the inertia of the weight to multiply the force. This is something even Archimedes or all the world's inventors since might have invented. Archimedes was the author of volumes of sound and action adventure. No doubt he knew about lifting weights on machines, the difference is using the weight itself lifted like water to then do work. This may seem obvious, but someone had to put the memo on the first website! This is the genius of gravity powered machines.

  When you think about this, moving a pack like a luggage cart sideways up a hill is much easier than to put the weight on your back for the same distance, thus the sideways motion of the beam at the top of the cycle to take up the imbalance as the bucket is emptied at the top can be counterbalanced more easily than just by way of the pressure of gravity that also makes it near to 60% better.

..

Not only is the weight of both masses reduced, their inertia is increased. If you took the two weights to orbit and weightlessness, the weight would be 0 and the force needed both to start and stop the masses would be much the same, so energy is conserved. But when the machine is moved to the earth's surface, like motion of the wheel on the superhighway, more force is able to move the "reduced weight". Gravity is implosive and is reversed in the outward entropy of more common force, so gravity seems to have opposite entropy.

..

Click here for several patents on gravity powered machines, see field of invention.

..

Each time a machine like the bucket is lifted there's extra hydrolectric power out and the overall spin of the earth is reduced just a bit. Even more amazing is that engineers have been trying to invent machines like this since ancient times but didn't know what they were. I think the Energy Conservation Promotion Foundation has named the conservation of motion the same as the conservation of motive power, which seems to be something else, with gravity, at any rate. The motion of the higher energy field like electrodynamics is balanced by the electric charges with conservation of motion because it's mostly balanced but gravity is continually violating conservation of motive power locally by wringing out the power of the earth and sun, no matter how much time passes there will always be more of the motive power. And since relativity is about the speed of light and thus electrodynamics of electricity and the balance of charges, gravity is perpetually imbalanced and so the power of these machines is proof of the opposition of special relativity and gravity. Einstein himself believed that a massive body gains mass with time by way of the gravity, as they've found with supermassive astronomy where there is no matter falling in, yet the masses are increasing at the right rate to be explained by implosion of particles of the field. As I say here on my Physics Synopses Link I think this is because gravity is not relativistic and so gravity and other waves like the strong force spinning around may move at faster than light.

..

You may know that a spinning mass keeps the same rate of spin, even so the sun is continually radiating out power. If the sun or a spinning wheel were more important, I believe the sun would be. Though the sun may overpower the quanta, even so the same field is here trying to boost acceleration, an asymmetrical field by definition may have extra flow of power. If a gyroscope were gravity powered and the field is there like in common gravity of a centrifuge much the same by Einstein's equivalence principle and Einstein's other idea of mass augmentation, wouldn't it speed up? This relates to a fundamental question about gravity, if gravity causes the redshift of light and redshift is an expansion of wavelength, why isn't the Earth inside out? My answer is that gravity itself may operate on a much different wavelength, that has Blueshift Click Here , because gravity brings masses together, it doesn't cause reradiation mostly (while I agree with Einsteins other idea here too that it may reradiate with i.e. cosmic acceleration, mostly it's implosive.) Because gravity is attractive Einstein's idea about mass augmentation with time may be more true than the conservation of angular momentum because it's something different. So while the Earth doesn't speed up, it certainly has an acceleration we constantly feel. I believe gravity is not the same as relativity, because the speed of light is only constant in uniform motion, and gravity is an acceleration, it can't be cancelled by the choice of frame of motion, gravity implodes, and linear motion may cause the radiance outward of centrifugal force, and so on. The use of this distinction may be by gravity powered machines, gravity like a sort of giant one way valve to give the huge weight to the rocks of the Earth, and the outflow if like Einstein believed and by my idea it's mostly of a lower wavelength so we don't fall off the Earth by antigravity, and also to have the Earth not gaining much weight from the implosion of the field. If the inflow is not the same as the outflow, a constant force is being created. The use of gravity powered machines may be like the source of hydroelectric power of the sun, just nearer and in many ways dearer to us.

..

,,These gravity powered machines are special, though you may see machines nearby, I remember engineers are often devising new machines, there is more to be engineered yet, some would say. 

...

Einstein believed an electron might increase in mass with time. Experiments to prove if this was so found that old electrons weigh the same as new ones. This seems like the gyrosoope spinning around and not speeding up with time. Like the quanta of the wheel the springs (electrons) stretch but just so much and then no more. If we put two springs like electrons or more common mass on a scale and then tried to power it by gravity if the springs were attached to the base of the machine and the scale there would be no extra power. However if we move them in the field of the gravity unencumbered and balanced by the machine the gravity in a real sense would be independant of the inertial component of the field, this is why the two components of a ballistic arc are independant. They operate at much different wavelengths and energies, otherwise gravity would be exactly the same as inertia. Gravity power machines in essence seem to have the inertia seperate from the gravity with less resistance from the field. We can squeeze power out from a diesel engine, and knowing when in the cycle to find the power is important, no doubt.

..

If like me, you hope to improve the world, Click Here for some Comics by me for creative energy to energise you another way than mere physics.

-

...Unlimited motive power is not uncommon in some machines, gravity is continually squeezing out extra power from the fusion of stars, and hydroelectric power when the machines go online generate power unlimited at low cost, the same for the power of reactors. These machines may be used for motive power of other machines of any type there are, like atomic machines up to giant power plants, with no cost other than wear due to friction. In the future all houses may have a gravity power machine, in storms all the power wires would be improved you see outside (Actually they found a way in 1997 for the fields around the outside the power wires for broadband for the whole country with just one small laser but with no power in the wires anymore, perhaps the greater hazard of the EMF of the wires would also be solved when they remove the wires. With so much power saved and earned by these machines broadband by usual radio waves would be a lot cheaper.).

..

...Gravity powered machines would seem to be completely safe for the environment. The only problem about this may be that the earth will gradually slow down (2079 is always zoomer than we think) so this might be solved by just aim of the machines into the earth's field by a non radial method. Note that these machines would be of worth even if the Earth had no spin, the field would continue squeezing out the heat, so the spin of the Earth is a seperate component of the field and the machines if used wisely would be able to use the power without loss of the spin of the Earth over time. Some have devised rotary machines that would have the two large weights and the weights would rock with more power as they also spin around, the spin of the right type would cancel out the spin otherwise taken from the field. Another way to "save the month hour and year" might be by using the most massive gravity powered machines just in the N. and S where they wouldn't much cancel the spin in the extreme high latitudes and wire most of the power to the S and N.

..MY PHYSICS SYNOPSES/FASTER THAN LIGHT, ECT.
-

Earth Asteroid Impact; An Improved Solution

Earth Day all Month!

The New Scientist says this month they have plans to save the earth from the event of asteroid impact by use of a heavy enough ship of perhaps 20 tons that would have enough gravitational force to move the asteroid enough to miss the earth. The machine, which would be relatively easy to build, would have enough gravity if it just stayed beside the big stonehenge block to move it in a year, but this would only be with a massive asteroid. While our sensors would see the big behemoths with a 20 year advance notice, the plan wouldn't work for smaller blocks on the stars hollywood elevator of fame without enough time to reach it and move it. This means small asteroids of less than a thousand feet wide (we can't see them well) limit the use of the massive ship to save the earth by this means. Because of this on the New Scientist link some say we should just find ways to sound out small asteroids well with radar or other methods and then just use common evacuation methods to save the people who live where the impact would take place, this is considered the better value for the cost.


BEAMS IN BOOMS

A cheaper method as I've said may be to use just a laser or other beam to change the path of a small or medium asteroid that would then whizz by the impactor deflecting it rapidly and cheaply. Because there wouldn't be as much advance notice or way to move the deflection mass to meet it just at the right month, a problem with this might be to reach the impactor in time by this method of both beam and gravity (of my own authorship). Even so moving smaller asteroids is faster than big stones of this type because by F=ma the same force applied a smaller mass will move it with higher velocity. If this helps and moves the small asteroid to deflect the large or medium asteroid in time to stop the impact this plan may still have the problem of random motion of the stones of the asteroid, they might break loose, which are believed to be a hazard because the whole asteroid and the stones nearby are all on the same collision path towards earth and many of them might cause damage if they hit the earth. (An asteroid is often like a loose bag of stones and sand). This is a reason the heavy ship beside the asteroid to deflect it was believed to be of worth, it would just have a gentle force of the gravity of this ship to move the asteroid slowly.


SLICE OF LIFE

Another problem is about the high cost of boosting a 20 ton ship that far, as the people envision who favor just advance warning systems and evacuation over the heavy ship plan to move the asteroid by this method. A cheaper solution possible may be to use what I consider to be the general Equivalence of mass and inertia (not the same but close enough see My General Physics Synopses. Page for why I disagree with Einstein) so the machines that use an oscillating slice of wheel to aim the centrifugal force in just one direction instead of cancelling out all the way around the wheel could be used in place of what would have been the heavy ship as on the New Scientist site. This type of machine just exerts pressure on one side with the exhausts of the rockets and on the other side via the more controllable centrifugal force of inertia which would act much like gravity. The ship will move much lighter faster and cheaper, better than either the heavy machine or the advanced notice. The machine could be fine tuned with enough force to move it as fast as possible while being cautious to not move it so fast it would loosen the stones.

Another way to achieve low weight of the ship without loose stones may be to send a machine that has a low energy maser of the same or more energy than the 20 ton machine would use, of low enough power not to loosen the stones though of higher speed than by other machines, or even lasers that would sense where the stones are and exert pressure just on the more solid zones to move the meteorite or comet by computer actuation.
-

Optimizing On Up

These plans could be used in optimal combination on a budget, if we could afford no more and a heavy asteroid was headed our way, a machine like this could be used to just move the asteroid somewhat. But with just a bit of force we would move a big impactor to one side perhaps from the land to the ocean or the north and south and then just evacuate the people who lived there. For big asteroids with more advance warning it may be most cost saving to just move a small asteroid with the beam to move the larger, or an optimal combination, If the change in the path of the asteroid were distant and there was more advance room, the loose stones would be safer.

-
Got a lot of junk in your Post Office Box? Does the Sales team at the Auto Lot fill your box with memos for a breathbrush? Here's a solution; a Machine that converts all those annoying junk blurbs to paper, or rags. They've used junk posts to heat houses in a machine for years, so instead of burning the junk in a stove this would cleanse and recycle it, a good way to help the ecology. Resturants and county Auto memos for vehicles could earn a diploma in Mail Order with a Ma Bell cyber memo , Act As Save As If!

They say looking up to see the sky is calming, like with doctors who talk about the weather so they are paid the most. But we lived in the warmth of the low latitudes of the world for millions of years before the invention of fire, so it's not real evolution to go outside in much of the weather around December 35th or so. Rich relatives (yours, no doubt!) have had rooms with roofs that roll to see the shine. The ancient amphitheater in Rome had a roof of this type, and the ampitheater would even fill up with waves for sea fights by warriors in boats in the arena. What we don't want this weather or lions in the den of our room and want a roof like the rich? A good solution of the 21st century is a TV that beams up the star treck episodes live! It would light up your ceiling which reflects off the beam so they say may you see, not just the live vision of stars and moon and Venus at night, you can zoom anywhere in the cosmos, or use it as a learning or sleep learning machine, a giant computer so you would always be able to read mom's memos and it's easier to compute lying down (lying takes less energy than sitting or standing) or increase the hours of the day when you see the light and clouds or stars for more sleep like in evolution. If the roof is well reflective and the machine is on the wall it would be a much cheaper way to achieve this than a giant TV. The walls could also be with visions of anywhere in the world you'd want to visit (like the zoom on Wheel of Fortune).

They say trees reduce problems when they are planted on roads in urban realms, it sooths me when mom wins 30,000 more than the Wheel when jogging!

..