Atomic Spin Motor
The Power of Mass Is Spinning Energy
Many machines may be more achievable by safe atomic power. All the nuclear spins are powered by the strong force. The problem of fusion generators has been that they are trying to use something "light" in subatomic physics (the electric field) to hold down the strong force, which has much more power. If mass is just spinning energy, I think a safer source of atomic power may be found. Instead of the fusion method trying to blast the strong force particles at each other and hoping they slam in just right, here's how the spin of the strong force and the centrifugal force may be harnessed. The proton has electric charge, so if the spinning proton was made stable and the electric field connected to the shorter range strong force were tapped, the atomic power of each proton could be drained off at our leisure with much reduced risk of explosion or radioactivity. To make this motor protons could be self assembled in chains of a few, and the chain would be held stable by pulling on each side so the chain is under tension balanced in traction by the opposite magnetic poles of each proton, alternating. To tap the power an electron beam would go by the spin of the proton doing work by the field so the beam generator on one side and the collector on the other would be wired on the other side all the way around the proton chain to create a net flow of closed circuit power from spin of the protons field. Protons only are used for the machine because with both protons and neutrons which have opposite strong force fields, they would be more unstable and if a roaming particle hit the chain it would destabilize the machine and cause a nuclear explosion that could then spread to other nearby chains. And the neutrons have no electric charge so they would not have the field to tap out the strong force from the protons. For the same reason fusion power generators are considered safer than fission, since this idea has just protons which are decayed into just hydrogen building blocks, radioactivity would be low. The dream of the use of the formulas of relativity where it was thought a handfull of any mass, not just uranuim, would be enough power for a month in the country in the city would be achieved, since the power source of the protons is found in all atoms from all realms, not just uranium or hydrogen. (The city in the country is where I like village gossip-especially the world village! Aloha Island Air helps me breathe well if I'm at 30,000 when I recieve X-rays from the nurse). The protons could be seperated with a bit of power for use in the atomic motor and then the much greater power source of the protons themselves would be the power achieved. Or just as with fusion generators hydrogen could be used. Why not just use the atom itself to tap the spin of the protons and neutrons via the arm of the electrons which spin and are attached by the field to the spin of the hadrons in the atom? Because the spin of the center of the atom is random, and the proton and neutron spins mostly cancel, so more of it's wasted. And the distance of a beam close to the links of the motor would not be as much so it would also tap a lot more of the power and be a much more compact power source. It's a more atomic power source. A usual atom would get some of its spin from the hadrons but mostly the connection wouldn't be nearly so high power.
.Even with the protons seperate from the neutrons without shielding there would be a risk of an outside hadron zooming and hitting the chain and causing instability. My solutions are insulating the chains in small lead "cells" or perhaps proton solids of much smaller size or other shields and making the proton chains of few number of protons. So if the inevitable hadron makes it through the shield, it would cause just a small reaction and the lead would shield this from outside the explosion so even if it were destabilized the radioactivity wouldn't reach the other shielded cells.
. The applications of atomic spin power would be numerous. It would totally alter the world's economy, for example it would make the billions of tons of gold in the world's oceans finally within reach with a large power source to power the "filters". Instead of trash compacters all rooms could have incinerators that would divide up the compounds of the trash to the level of just hydrogen, or recombine the elements of the trash to any useful compounds, and power a miniature plant that would make for example outfits out of your metal. No more power bills, they would pay you. Radioactive waste would be boosted to the stars. You would go to the station and pick up a power box and it would cost as much as ethyl but would power your 200 mph van 10 years. (In the near term some have thought they may improve electric vehicles by power packs that they would rent at the station and the already charged packs would be reduced in mass and wait, and they've invented a slow charge up from orbit with collectors on the vehicle.) All goods would be at much lower cost since the shipping cost of trucks on the road and boats on the ocean would be reduced. With a much stronger safe power source like this travel to and from mars and the moon would be much cheaper. The price of just going to mars now is estimated in trillions. The cost of living in space stations is estimated at 1 million per person. It would be like the early days of derigibles, sooner or later a big explosion or collision would happen. It's thought even with the US Space Program any big collision or explosion would slow down the program 25 years. It may be a lot better to spend most of our colonization time out of orbit and going to and from the moon and mars with people, the only time people would be inside outer space, all the rest of the time they would be safe and sound in the rooms below the surface, for satellites and such it may be a lot safer and cheaper to do all the repairs of such as TV or cellular satellites by computer-rised machine. We may already have a good enough lighter than air lightship, the army is building "light craft" powered by lasers from the ground that are much cheaper per pound to boost to orbit, cheap power combined with this may make going to mars or the moon feasable. Light craft will be much safer in transit because no fuel to boom is on board the ship. And they may even have a cosmic speed limit in near earth orbit since the ship has enough power to go up slower at this price without having to use the high speed centrifugal force to counteract the gravity, reducing the risk of collision or crash. Once the space junk is cleared out with laser zaps to burn up the fluff, nets on rockets to boost the big stuff down for safe burnout over the ocean, we could reach the Ramada on the moon in orbit.
AUTHORS NOTE; This invention I consider of possible reduced value as of November 06, due to more consideration about the field of particles like protons and other hadrons. A main problem is that even if the inner field of hadrons is flexed by the strong force, the outer field of hadrons would spin just at the speed of light to obey the conversion of the strong force to the usual Emc2 of Einstein. (The "c" is the important number in the equation, it's the conversion number in all of relativity of mass to power. As if you have to speed up all mass to the speed of light to wring all the power out of it.) But motion of the hadron's field is not the same as work, and if the outer charge is always just at the speed of light it would just move around and not do work on the Visa. This is also a main disproof of the Hydrino Theory of Mills. If you got usual matter to achieve force changes in the electric field at more distance it would have a huge amount of power constantly being radiated out of the earth. AND it would also change all the spectra of all the stars. So a strong reason why hadrons can't be contracted to a small size may be that the centrifugal force of the strong force flexing against the electric field can't make the field go faster than light outside the hadron, so the strong force is limited by the speed of light and the charges in just multiples of the usual 1 or -1 (The reason you can add more multiples of the electric charge and go at 100%, 200%, 300%....or more of the speed of light with more charges added on is because the spin which much related with the charge, goes at say 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees....and so on so as you add more charge none of the added spins go at faster than light. You would have them layered on like this so they would always have the electric field converting the mass to energy in the usual speed of light conversion of Emc2). So if the outer spin is just in motion mostly without much extra atomic power of faster than light it might seem the atomic motor and the molecular conveyer belt motor and so on are disproven, but wait there's more! Although by this idea the atomic motor conveyer may not be feasable without extra power to make the surface do work, the atomic spin motor may be feasable. It would be easy to construct by assembling compounds in the jug, and the improved atomic motor would have the electric beam that would go by the outside of the proton's field and zoom in and actually blend in with the field so it would be pick up a lot more of the atomic power collected from the ricochet. This is like in realtor ads, wow to be rich without stepping in a room? Be a copy Chateau! If the proton won't interact by usual outer charges being in the same rest frame, bevel in and it's power. Both these types of machines would be of huge worth and are they are worth looking into. US Law says I'm the only one who can patent it since I'm the inventor, but I'm willing to consider other's donations. If you're interested, why not call 276-228-3465. I just have a year since I disclosed it to patent.
Faster Than Light, Evidence, Causology and Simple Ways To Prove or Disprove; What I call GWD General Wave Dynamics, Hopes to generalize Maxwell's use of field density/resiliency he used to exactly predict the speed of light.
Friday, November 18, 2005
Evolution, Ethics And Overpopulation
.
MY EXPLANATION OF WHY OVERPOPULATION IS THOUGHT TO BE THE CAUSE OF THE FALL OF THE MAYA AND OTHER CIVILIZATIONS
There are three ages when about the same level of population density was found in history to be followed by a decline of those civilizations. The Maya, Ancient Rome in 1 AD and after, and the decline of England after about 1776, the major urban areas had about 1 million in Rome and London and the Maya, followed by a decline. What caused this high density seems to be inconsideration of what had evolved by ourer hunting of predators. It's obvious that there is truth here in the proverb, there is no bad which does not bring good, and research shows with overcrowding most higher animals become ill. This in evolution would then have reduced the population, and they would have then been more healthy and this would then have added to the population with cycles that conditioned us to well established limits of just how much any one animal or human may achieve by more or reduced overpopulation. It's found in research that social pathology is more common in the city, and of course with not enough people in the country it would be more common. In evolution before the invention of fire we all lived in the tropics and had the optimum number of neighbors near and dear because we wouldn't have been living in the city or out in the country in houses and no one for miles, with the conditions most optimal for life in the outer realms of the cities, and this explains why. Another way of looking at this is the same general theory of Supply and Demand in economics, if there is more overpopulation, there would be either more competition (Demand) than than the evolved amount of competition needed for the same resources (Supply) than they would have gotten cheap in supply in all ages past leading to strain. Or the same motif rearranged; reduced resources of supply for evolution's usual amount of demand that would have won in all other times for the same labor, which would also be a strain, either way most city dwellers would lose. All there is is based on balance of action and reaction, good and bad, hot and cold, most of the life in the world is near the surface, where the forces are level. If one of these is out of balance, evolution will know. This would explain why the plague of the 14th century was followed by the brilliance of the Renaissance. Since the time from the start of the plague to the rebirth of the 14 hundreds was just one 14th the time from the start of the decline of the ancient world to the 14 hundreds, it's improbable to have been just coincidence. Even the conditions in the dark ages weren't enough to lower the overpopulation enough to revive civilization. So all around us, the high civilization before and hopefully after us may owe perhaps 90 percent of it's power just to the plague. If the dark ages were too overcrowded, and the plague hadn't reduced the overpopulation that improved the more general health of Europe, it might have stayed in the dark ages for 1000 more years.
A rather startling conclusion; we may owe our wealth and power, and the golden age of painting, literature and music, the invention of science, to mice! (This was how the plague was in ships and reached the west.)And if the overcrowding is with us today this is why half the world is in communism now. All we are is based on our relationship to land, so I think communism isn't gone, just sleeping. The overpopulation is higher than all ages past, and this would be why they have it worse in Russia now than before Vlastnost. This is why the ideas of How to Solve Overcrowding on this site may be of import to our future. Even if this method of more room is a real Win on our MSN account it wouldn't be sustainable without some real sort of reduction of overpopulation. It would buy time via the room but the problem of the pressure of Supply and Demand would return, if the same number of people per unit of room, the pressure is the same. If the number of people increases a lot we would soon use up all the room found on the moon or Mars. Space stations aren't considered an option since it would cost a million dollars per person, and they have problems with being flimsy like explosions, leaks and radiation. So I consider methods of creating more room for us to be just a temporary way out for a while. Good deeds were common in the wild for millions of years or evolution wouldn't have gone uphill. If this is proven by supply and demand, any advanced civilization would survive by voluntary limits on their numbers. All the resources would be used up otherwise. Imagine if in 50 years we all have just a foot of room. With our numbers going up, there will be a definite time when the agriculture will be outpaced by our numbers, with the land by more people always reduced for agriculture. We may reduce our number of people per unit of room by finding more of the room above, buying time enough to limit our numbers and never letting them go higher than like levels of 1800 or 1900 from that time on out. This would be salvation for those who have made a bit of error about how our ecology is, our own world, but who with a bit of effort and the power of science, could achieve the most golden exultation as good as any in the history of all neighbors-mine all are! If we have just goals and can't help us how can we help others? Even if there's no way to bring our Eden back, the way to Aurora, OH should always be North. A way to prove that overcrowding is the cause the present social pathology not found in evolution would be to take healthy volunteers who lived in the suburbs all their life and move them to the city with the same amount of money for a few years, and measure how healthy they are about fatigue, stress hormones, blood pressure, and so on. They say blood pressure goes up when a person talks. I think it may go up higher when listening to others talk, this may be of worth research for sweetheart to sweetheart talks. If you have to live in the city relief from the noise may soon be available for you without having to leave the city. They now have chips that cancel out most of the sound by an inverse wave worn as an audio. With the chip speed doubling fast, these headsets may give you sweet smooth rest. These AN machines like heads up will be in widespread use in education in just a year or two.
It's already well proven that social problems are several times more common in the cities, many would say this is not a proof of cause. They may say many of the people are poor there so this may be the problem, and drugs are used in such realms, and so on. If healthy people were moved from the country to the city with the same amount of cash, no drugs, and so forth, this would be a prediction the theory of overpopulation would prove. Of all the science and creativity on the internet, I consider this explanation of Competition and Reseouces by far the most important- all else may be worthless without life lived well and room of our own. I hope you remember I think this may be of more value about the rest of our lives than any other at this time in our history. If it's worth doing, it's worth doing for riches.
Encyclopedia Americana says that most countries have more the problem of urbanization (moving to the cities) than overcrowding. So we have another solution to buy more time and slow the overcrowding if we move to the country. This is my belief, if you want to help save the world, and sleep sound, move to the suburbs of the world village, you won't have to shout, and you'll hear the rain on the roof and see the stars. While the plan may save us for a while I think the only real solution my be by voluntary reduction of our numbers-just like a usual advanced civilization would!
.
.Without the plague, history would have been much like watching The History Channel All Month. Constantinople, the Rome of the east had much of the documents held over from the ancient world. If the Merovingian era had continued a thousand more years it's probable sooner or later Constantinople would have fallen (it fell in 1453). Without even this 1/100th of the ancient world's authorship saved on a giant computer, the ancient sculptures and vase paintings would have stayed safe in bogs and dirt, (a Venus much saved is a Venus much urned!) while with a 1000 year delay for a reawakening, authors like Shakespeare would have had to reinvent the word processor wheel. Copernicus or Newton would not have had the guidance of the ancients like Aristarchus as foundation of the heliocentric way that the earth goes around the moon "somewhat". No serious scientist after Aristotle believed the world was not round, so a latter day Columbus would have had reduced hopes of wages from the royals to find the US. Whether the western world would have been found would have been more luck; a continued age of slow life when all were in their 50's would have both reduced explorations, but increased invasions, like nations who are "having a bad day" sometimes do, because of the plague and mice. While there are obviously other influences in history (please see this link )Any important balance from millions of years of evolution by this would seem of highest worth.
.
MY EXPLANATION OF WHY OVERPOPULATION IS THOUGHT TO BE THE CAUSE OF THE FALL OF THE MAYA AND OTHER CIVILIZATIONS
There are three ages when about the same level of population density was found in history to be followed by a decline of those civilizations. The Maya, Ancient Rome in 1 AD and after, and the decline of England after about 1776, the major urban areas had about 1 million in Rome and London and the Maya, followed by a decline. What caused this high density seems to be inconsideration of what had evolved by ourer hunting of predators. It's obvious that there is truth here in the proverb, there is no bad which does not bring good, and research shows with overcrowding most higher animals become ill. This in evolution would then have reduced the population, and they would have then been more healthy and this would then have added to the population with cycles that conditioned us to well established limits of just how much any one animal or human may achieve by more or reduced overpopulation. It's found in research that social pathology is more common in the city, and of course with not enough people in the country it would be more common. In evolution before the invention of fire we all lived in the tropics and had the optimum number of neighbors near and dear because we wouldn't have been living in the city or out in the country in houses and no one for miles, with the conditions most optimal for life in the outer realms of the cities, and this explains why. Another way of looking at this is the same general theory of Supply and Demand in economics, if there is more overpopulation, there would be either more competition (Demand) than than the evolved amount of competition needed for the same resources (Supply) than they would have gotten cheap in supply in all ages past leading to strain. Or the same motif rearranged; reduced resources of supply for evolution's usual amount of demand that would have won in all other times for the same labor, which would also be a strain, either way most city dwellers would lose. All there is is based on balance of action and reaction, good and bad, hot and cold, most of the life in the world is near the surface, where the forces are level. If one of these is out of balance, evolution will know. This would explain why the plague of the 14th century was followed by the brilliance of the Renaissance. Since the time from the start of the plague to the rebirth of the 14 hundreds was just one 14th the time from the start of the decline of the ancient world to the 14 hundreds, it's improbable to have been just coincidence. Even the conditions in the dark ages weren't enough to lower the overpopulation enough to revive civilization. So all around us, the high civilization before and hopefully after us may owe perhaps 90 percent of it's power just to the plague. If the dark ages were too overcrowded, and the plague hadn't reduced the overpopulation that improved the more general health of Europe, it might have stayed in the dark ages for 1000 more years.
A rather startling conclusion; we may owe our wealth and power, and the golden age of painting, literature and music, the invention of science, to mice! (This was how the plague was in ships and reached the west.)And if the overcrowding is with us today this is why half the world is in communism now. All we are is based on our relationship to land, so I think communism isn't gone, just sleeping. The overpopulation is higher than all ages past, and this would be why they have it worse in Russia now than before Vlastnost. This is why the ideas of How to Solve Overcrowding on this site may be of import to our future. Even if this method of more room is a real Win on our MSN account it wouldn't be sustainable without some real sort of reduction of overpopulation. It would buy time via the room but the problem of the pressure of Supply and Demand would return, if the same number of people per unit of room, the pressure is the same. If the number of people increases a lot we would soon use up all the room found on the moon or Mars. Space stations aren't considered an option since it would cost a million dollars per person, and they have problems with being flimsy like explosions, leaks and radiation. So I consider methods of creating more room for us to be just a temporary way out for a while. Good deeds were common in the wild for millions of years or evolution wouldn't have gone uphill. If this is proven by supply and demand, any advanced civilization would survive by voluntary limits on their numbers. All the resources would be used up otherwise. Imagine if in 50 years we all have just a foot of room. With our numbers going up, there will be a definite time when the agriculture will be outpaced by our numbers, with the land by more people always reduced for agriculture. We may reduce our number of people per unit of room by finding more of the room above, buying time enough to limit our numbers and never letting them go higher than like levels of 1800 or 1900 from that time on out. This would be salvation for those who have made a bit of error about how our ecology is, our own world, but who with a bit of effort and the power of science, could achieve the most golden exultation as good as any in the history of all neighbors-mine all are! If we have just goals and can't help us how can we help others? Even if there's no way to bring our Eden back, the way to Aurora, OH should always be North. A way to prove that overcrowding is the cause the present social pathology not found in evolution would be to take healthy volunteers who lived in the suburbs all their life and move them to the city with the same amount of money for a few years, and measure how healthy they are about fatigue, stress hormones, blood pressure, and so on. They say blood pressure goes up when a person talks. I think it may go up higher when listening to others talk, this may be of worth research for sweetheart to sweetheart talks. If you have to live in the city relief from the noise may soon be available for you without having to leave the city. They now have chips that cancel out most of the sound by an inverse wave worn as an audio. With the chip speed doubling fast, these headsets may give you sweet smooth rest. These AN machines like heads up will be in widespread use in education in just a year or two.
It's already well proven that social problems are several times more common in the cities, many would say this is not a proof of cause. They may say many of the people are poor there so this may be the problem, and drugs are used in such realms, and so on. If healthy people were moved from the country to the city with the same amount of cash, no drugs, and so forth, this would be a prediction the theory of overpopulation would prove. Of all the science and creativity on the internet, I consider this explanation of Competition and Reseouces by far the most important- all else may be worthless without life lived well and room of our own. I hope you remember I think this may be of more value about the rest of our lives than any other at this time in our history. If it's worth doing, it's worth doing for riches.
Encyclopedia Americana says that most countries have more the problem of urbanization (moving to the cities) than overcrowding. So we have another solution to buy more time and slow the overcrowding if we move to the country. This is my belief, if you want to help save the world, and sleep sound, move to the suburbs of the world village, you won't have to shout, and you'll hear the rain on the roof and see the stars. While the plan may save us for a while I think the only real solution my be by voluntary reduction of our numbers-just like a usual advanced civilization would!
.
.Without the plague, history would have been much like watching The History Channel All Month. Constantinople, the Rome of the east had much of the documents held over from the ancient world. If the Merovingian era had continued a thousand more years it's probable sooner or later Constantinople would have fallen (it fell in 1453). Without even this 1/100th of the ancient world's authorship saved on a giant computer, the ancient sculptures and vase paintings would have stayed safe in bogs and dirt, (a Venus much saved is a Venus much urned!) while with a 1000 year delay for a reawakening, authors like Shakespeare would have had to reinvent the word processor wheel. Copernicus or Newton would not have had the guidance of the ancients like Aristarchus as foundation of the heliocentric way that the earth goes around the moon "somewhat". No serious scientist after Aristotle believed the world was not round, so a latter day Columbus would have had reduced hopes of wages from the royals to find the US. Whether the western world would have been found would have been more luck; a continued age of slow life when all were in their 50's would have both reduced explorations, but increased invasions, like nations who are "having a bad day" sometimes do, because of the plague and mice. While there are obviously other influences in history (please see this link )Any important balance from millions of years of evolution by this would seem of highest worth.
.
Thursday, November 17, 2005
ESP; A Possible A Possible Proof or Disproof
Please see this link; http://lvsound.blogspot.com/ Thanks More Power Than an Exercise Machine has in A Cushy Wave FM Sofa!
Relief For Depression Possible Via MRI
COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY MAY LEAD TO LOTS OF COMEDY!
MRI may be used to find a good herb for depression (depressed persons come out of the MRI machine laughing and joking) by finding what part of the brain is stimulated and then rapidly custom engineering a drug that would cause the same change in the brain the MRI does if the change is simple or perhaps more complex. The chemical would be engineered fast by combinatorial chemistry (this is where they take a batch of chemical building blocks that are already of promise, combining them rapidly, and then using criteria (this time, it heats up the part of the brain the way the MRI does, chemically and so on)) to select to find the best compounds and, then repeat this same process of "theory and research" to rapidly 0 in on the compounds of value. This may perhaps cure depression, of major import to the economy.
-
MRI may be used to find a good herb for depression (depressed persons come out of the MRI machine laughing and joking) by finding what part of the brain is stimulated and then rapidly custom engineering a drug that would cause the same change in the brain the MRI does if the change is simple or perhaps more complex. The chemical would be engineered fast by combinatorial chemistry (this is where they take a batch of chemical building blocks that are already of promise, combining them rapidly, and then using criteria (this time, it heats up the part of the brain the way the MRI does, chemically and so on)) to select to find the best compounds and, then repeat this same process of "theory and research" to rapidly 0 in on the compounds of value. This may perhaps cure depression, of major import to the economy.
-
Wednesday, November 16, 2005
Entropy History and Fusion; Time Machines
There's no theoretical objection to building a time machine even to the past, Einstein considered this "at times". I believe if our record of where all the mass and energy was at a given day in history we might envision a giant machine that would use this ability, like a glorified 3d printer to revisit this age.
The problem is not about the idea itself, rather it's about feasibility..The past doesn't exist now so the only way to reach it would be by building a giant machine to rebuild that moment in history, hence building a giant machine would be costly.
.webp)
Another problem would be where would this rebuilt world we replace the old with go if we could find a good enough record on which to base the old world after we build the machine? Lots of people would object to "reduced resources".
The common objections about paradoxes about time travel to the past themselves may not be disproof because there are contradictions all around in e.g. Newton's Third Law, life, hot and cool, and in general.
Like in comedy, contradictions are common (by breaking the rules without malice one of the leading ideas about comedy.) If there were no value in this most employees would not rather have a boss with a sense of comedy and vice versa for the boss hoping and hoping for comical employees! A marriage also is more probable to do well if one or the other in the marriage has a sense of comedy. And in other research just anticipating a laugh improves efficiency. So it seems there is not just trivial evidence that incongruence is all around us. I'm serious about my comedy!
The paradoxes would be possible without disproof of the machine Einstein considered. Consider going to an age of an older history (with me this would be easy I know somewhat!). If you go to the old age of say 1987 and you influence not being with parent so your life is re edited or edited out a bit, you are just moving the "old you" to older times, and the older time from which you came is not in existence there so it has no influence. The "old you" there would just be mass and energy moved to another realm of space time without deep concern of the higher information about where you came from. (I think this is an error in information science or complexity, the assumption is that information is always mass and energy, if so it couldn't be created or destroyed, yet higher information is being changed all the time, a forest of wood can be a shelf, or a box the higher information is more ephemeral.) Time order wouldn't be necessary with the large machine. I believe if the world was changed in the past by the machine, this would reedit what would have been the future, even with contradiction of the higher information.
TIME AFTER TIME, REWIND MY AUDIO!
This about the 3d printer if used as a personal time machine and the other Relativistic Time Machine (my idea of slowing time in the lab by high speed electric fields relative motion, a sort of relativistic wind tunnel of the field) may also be of use for future starship travel instead of hibernation for ages while waiting to reach other star systems.
The paradoxes would be possible without disproof of the machine Einstein considered. Consider going to an age of an older history (with me this would be easy I know somewhat!). If you go to the old age of say 1987 and you influence not being with parent so your life is re edited or edited out a bit, you are just moving the "old you" to older times, and the older time from which you came is not in existence there so it has no influence. The "old you" there would just be mass and energy moved to another realm of space time without deep concern of the higher information about where you came from. (I think this is an error in information science or complexity, the assumption is that information is always mass and energy, if so it couldn't be created or destroyed, yet higher information is being changed all the time, a forest of wood can be a shelf, or a box the higher information is more ephemeral.) Time order wouldn't be necessary with the large machine. I believe if the world was changed in the past by the machine, this would reedit what would have been the future, even with contradiction of the higher information.
..
The large machine seems possible by the relocation of particles of energy and mass from one region of space and time to another guided by a stored record of the history on the month or hour the time machine would visit, by a glorified 3 d printer, the teleportation machine..
The large machine seems possible by the relocation of particles of energy and mass from one region of space and time to another guided by a stored record of the history on the month or hour the time machine would visit, by a glorified 3 d printer, the teleportation machine..
The Wikipedia site about Teleportation says that as the science advances there is no reason to believe these machines would be impossible.
Events of matter and energy in space and time are all the world and us are made of, so if we know where by the history of a point where it was at a given time and move it there this is a simple time machine, to go to an ancient hour in history would be the same idea except on a large scale. As above, the big problem is that a world changing time machine would have to be built- to visit an ancient time the world would have to be rewound to have a place in time to visit since it doesn't exist now, and this would take a big machine.
TIME AFTER TIME, REWIND MY AUDIO!
This about the 3d printer if used as a personal time machine and the other Relativistic Time Machine (my idea of slowing time in the lab by high speed electric fields relative motion, a sort of relativistic wind tunnel of the field) may also be of use for future starship travel instead of hibernation for ages while waiting to reach other star systems.
One of the main problems about even a small machine like this is about the extraction of the information about the source the record of the hopeful time to visit. I have agreed with Einstein that there may be a low energy particle (the Low Energy Higgs' a particle predicted and recently found in the lab) to get around this problem about the measuring or sensing ray also otherwise causing this interaction problem. I think if we could use what I call a Higgs' laser a tube of atoms with the Low Energy Higgs's resonating inside, this might go underneath the quantum energy as Einstein believed and it might enable us to find the record on which the 3d printer might base the buildup of the machine.
Consider that a mere atom may change the whole course of history (the polio virus that made the US stronger in World war II because of FDR's power of determination he may not have had without resistance to the illness that made him defend well, a barking dog is more of power than a sleeping lion).
In one type of classic machine the time traveller would have no options like a movie the same forward and in rewind. This would tell us nothing new since time without the machine allows volition, the main purpose of the big machine if it ever could be built would be as if to make it where the so more months might be ahead if you always sell your old Isabella the 27ths sofas..return to Sears next month!
To make it where the time machine visitor would go and convince Ferdinand and Isabella to stop Columbus, we would make changes in history and be able to prove or disprove what would have happened.
Carl Sagan comments that history would then be an experimental science. If volition is allowed for the time traveller he would go to the age to visit and history would be restarted at that hour and would influence the future. But the future he was from would be another future to which he could not return without a power wind fast foreword, without all the future returned to his own world by the time machine's read only fast forward alone from that point.
By changing history if just a bit in the time of the past he visited, he would be changing the world ahead if the masses motion like of atoms and molecules was not influenced by the machine. Insubstantial changes in the flow of the events would multiply the months ahead in ways they wouldn't have otherwise. Complex combinations would be unique and the randomness of each restarted moment from the rewound age in history to be visited would be so by the usual physics of times flow.
Einstein's belief in a Spinozan cosmos was if we know the momentum of each particle, all that would be needed to find all the rest in a machine like universe would be simple. One reason I disagree with Einstein here here is because time at least with waves is not easily reversible.. simple particles, like pool halls and the big cash box are easy to time reverse, but not if the cash waves are complex. And if all is in quanta, all is unchanging, and where does all the change around us come from?
Einstein's belief in a Spinozan cosmos was if we know the momentum of each particle, all that would be needed to find all the rest in a machine like universe would be simple. One reason I disagree with Einstein here here is because time at least with waves is not easily reversible.. simple particles, like pool halls and the big cash box are easy to time reverse, but not if the cash waves are complex. And if all is in quanta, all is unchanging, and where does all the change around us come from?
My belief is there is a fundamental randomness, based on nonlinear waviness, more like gravity, more fundamental than the quanta. You put in one input, you get out five nonpredictable outputs in quantum science, this would make each result of Einstein's resetting the time machine also unpredictable, even if the setup was exactly the same.
This would arise out of the basic nonlinearity of gravity and the low energy fields and this would make up the basic fields by overlapping complexity, an acceleration you set in one phase by particles and the waves cohere internally to give a different output each time.
(This relates to attraction via waves and repulsion by particles, waves being more fundamental to attraction since they are continuous and particles causing radiance by being discontinuous. To attract waves would have two sources and the wave is like a line that attracts by motion, the more motion by waving the wave, the more force is exerted by change in speed and frequency of the waves and work is done; repulsion takes place by particles, one mass throws the more solid weight and this causes recoil, first of the source and then the absorbed second radiant observer.
(This relates to attraction via waves and repulsion by particles, waves being more fundamental to attraction since they are continuous and particles causing radiance by being discontinuous. To attract waves would have two sources and the wave is like a line that attracts by motion, the more motion by waving the wave, the more force is exerted by change in speed and frequency of the waves and work is done; repulsion takes place by particles, one mass throws the more solid weight and this causes recoil, first of the source and then the absorbed second radiant observer.
Note that waves are lower energy like gravity, while particles are with more mass and momentum. This is why the IP of momentum transfer machines are considered to be a way to reach Mars in just a few weeks, by throwing the mass to the ship, and then the machine throws the mass to the cosmic shore. The interaction is stronger because the low energy waves are compressed enough to make the particles. Without the waves holding the systems together they would fizzle out to low density; thus gravity and waves are more fundamental even though particles are important.)
I believe if gravity is lighter than light it may move much faster than light as I say in my PHYSICS SYNOPSIS (see upper left of page) in my hopeful generalization of Maxwell's method, who Einstein admired the most in physics.
I believe if gravity is lighter than light it may move much faster than light as I say in my PHYSICS SYNOPSIS (see upper left of page) in my hopeful generalization of Maxwell's method, who Einstein admired the most in physics.
HISTORY By WAY of Neurons
These methods of travelling like by relative motion of the field in the relativistic wind tunnel or essentially, Einstein's consideration of the teleportation machine method above are not yet viable. The retrieval of the ancient light by consideration of Einstein's other ideas about it as I say above has some possible worth or perhaps a lot depending on the light. My favorite time travel method of these seems to be a more immediate method of simulation of the time, ancient time at any rate..
These methods of travelling like by relative motion of the field in the relativistic wind tunnel or essentially, Einstein's consideration of the teleportation machine method above are not yet viable. The retrieval of the ancient light by consideration of Einstein's other ideas about it as I say above has some possible worth or perhaps a lot depending on the light. My favorite time travel method of these seems to be a more immediate method of simulation of the time, ancient time at any rate..
As found by the brain science of the 1920's each neuron contains all the memory of the entire brain. It was found that trimming the brains of lab mice showed no limit about memory.
So I believe sensors like MRI or other sensors to find the information in old neurons and revive eyewitness accounts of ages past for use e.g. in forensics, paleology, and to make cool computer simulations of ancient events, this may be the best machine of all that we may see here in the 21st century. CLICK HERE for more.
One of my motivations to find if the record could be found by the first method was how to get the information if it's there, to us here?
WILL SUPERMASSIVE BODIES EVER BE OF WORTH AS TIME MACHINES?
Some like Kip Thorne or Stephen Hawking who hope to use the relativistic speed of acceleration of black holes and other massive bodies as a time machine of sorts..I think they are limited by the lack of complexity of the massive fields.
.
I would think using neurons to find older eyewitness accounts of history would make a good ancient history simulator via a heads up type machine, ect. What to say to a historian, What's up? Or to an astronomer, "What's broadband?!"
A Perfect Record of History?
To visit ancient ages by computer simulation, another possibility (other than recreation of the past world of the Big Machine by the same method of the machine scaled up for giant use and so on) may be that the light reflected from the sun on any day in history at the speed of light mostly as an unchanged particle (or the image of distant stars would be changed or unseen) since it was reflected at that month in history so it might be retrieved and used to find what actually happened on that hour. I call this a Perfect History. This would then be put in the computer to make history computer simulations based on much more information than historians have laugh lines and old comic celebrations, (like the history kid who said let bygones be bygones, or astronomers who say see you around!) It may be lots cheaper than the Big Machine if they may find a way try to find this from radiance from the Earth at any given day in history and use this information found to then make virtual historical visits with just usual cyber headsets and other such methods. Historian marms would love me, or optometrists who will see me now or dietitians who won't!
As promised my edit and improvement of this is about the use of two of Einstein's ideas;
Einstein predicted both that light is unchanged from emission to absorption so it has constant speed and also radiation pressure and other change of the light over a great distance by interaction with other light, one was the proven experiment yet the other wasn't. (I believe low energy light may change less with distance due to the Higgs' that act as stabilizers of the bosonic field; the low energy stabilization fields are at low speed like for the acceleration of gravity nearby for both particles of lower energy light, even so the majority of the two rays of energy have their energy stored in the Higgs' at slower speed relative to each other. Thus Einstein was wrong that the two high energy rays of light would impact instead of going right through each other, if no low energy field is present they being of high energy also might have radiation pressure.)
Since there is radiation pressure at high energy yet not at lower energy of the light, obviously beams of X Rays at right angles will have impacts of the particles like radiation pressure but low energy waves are without this.
To visit ancient ages by computer simulation, another possibility (other than recreation of the past world of the Big Machine by the same method of the machine scaled up for giant use and so on) may be that the light reflected from the sun on any day in history at the speed of light mostly as an unchanged particle (or the image of distant stars would be changed or unseen) since it was reflected at that month in history so it might be retrieved and used to find what actually happened on that hour. I call this a Perfect History. This would then be put in the computer to make history computer simulations based on much more information than historians have laugh lines and old comic celebrations, (like the history kid who said let bygones be bygones, or astronomers who say see you around!) It may be lots cheaper than the Big Machine if they may find a way try to find this from radiance from the Earth at any given day in history and use this information found to then make virtual historical visits with just usual cyber headsets and other such methods. Historian marms would love me, or optometrists who will see me now or dietitians who won't!
As promised my edit and improvement of this is about the use of two of Einstein's ideas;
Einstein predicted both that light is unchanged from emission to absorption so it has constant speed and also radiation pressure and other change of the light over a great distance by interaction with other light, one was the proven experiment yet the other wasn't. (I believe low energy light may change less with distance due to the Higgs' that act as stabilizers of the bosonic field; the low energy stabilization fields are at low speed like for the acceleration of gravity nearby for both particles of lower energy light, even so the majority of the two rays of energy have their energy stored in the Higgs' at slower speed relative to each other. Thus Einstein was wrong that the two high energy rays of light would impact instead of going right through each other, if no low energy field is present they being of high energy also might have radiation pressure.)
Since there is radiation pressure at high energy yet not at lower energy of the light, obviously beams of X Rays at right angles will have impacts of the particles like radiation pressure but low energy waves are without this.
I would say the zone between the particles of light seen and the lower energy "real" light might both have the information of the record yet be enough like the high energy particles to interact with the light from two regular distant light sources where they cross and subtract out the signal from each enough to hopefully find the record or some of the record. (If the low energy light interacts less to hold the record of the history but still interacts enough to find it (as was to Einstein's dismay but perhaps he was also right here also!)) it will perhaps "erode" and with older light it would be more and more uncommon as the radius from the time in history increases. So the possibility of the "perfect" record may be more like a fossil, eroded, mostly there in times of good visibility, and so on.
One of my motivations to find if the record could be found by the first method was how to get the information if it's there, to us here?
Gravity waves or the EPR were my first idea because as I say I was in a hurry at the time! If they are possibly of high speed and somewhere near the energy of the matter waves, I reasoned these methods might be combined. One beauty of the light method is however about timing. To find the distant light if it interacts in the median zone where Einstein was both right and wrong about the light, say to find the light from 50 years ago, we find the light rays crossed at just 25 years out, this means there is no wait to find the light from that day, all we have to do is find the right angle if the interaction zone has enough information and is also readable!
For example if we want to find the information in light from 100 years before, we might look for light interacting with it from the distant regular source at just 50 light years out. And for 50 years we may look for the other sources that cross at that angle. This means angle may be important.
For example if we want to find the information in light from 100 years before, we might look for light interacting with it from the distant regular source at just 50 light years out. And for 50 years we may look for the other sources that cross at that angle. This means angle may be important.
Regular sources at the given angle would be a given by nature. We can't move them and only these ways to illuminate history may be how to know more about what was going on then, at least if other methods aren't enough to know. I'm only saying this is one way we may find out about history, this isn't the only way, but it may turn out to be useful.
(To build a giant optical telescope, we might use my idea of a rotating ray of light to sweep out the area of this "lense". The ray could have two standing waves that change the resilience of the medium, that is, the refraction and then another smaller sensor finds the light. This might be of worth for communications, finding the "perfect" record and also the lights of distant advanced civilizations, and for finding Earthlike worlds, all real cheap compared to a giant conventional machine.
(To build a giant optical telescope, we might use my idea of a rotating ray of light to sweep out the area of this "lense". The ray could have two standing waves that change the resilience of the medium, that is, the refraction and then another smaller sensor finds the light. This might be of worth for communications, finding the "perfect" record and also the lights of distant advanced civilizations, and for finding Earthlike worlds, all real cheap compared to a giant conventional machine.
Another "cheap" method of building giant telescopes I envision may be to use giant gas filled lenses, much lighter and cheaper to orbit, and no doubt an optimal method of using arrays of them could also be of worth and these could help us heat worlds nearer for colonization, saving the earth from asteroid impact by ablation and radiation pressure to move the impactor, or even solving the onset of a future ice age.)
My belief is that if a good memory machine was available, even if the power source would need to be large like fusion, there would be no limit to how far the Big Machine could rewind all the way to the start of the Earth even, because it would be the simple process of finding the record, storing the info and then using it to build up the ancient age to visit with a giant decoder.
My belief is that if a good memory machine was available, even if the power source would need to be large like fusion, there would be no limit to how far the Big Machine could rewind all the way to the start of the Earth even, because it would be the simple process of finding the record, storing the info and then using it to build up the ancient age to visit with a giant decoder.
However, because of no way to find the information about what was going on in the old ages before the Big Machine was built, I see no way rewinds could be achieved before when a big machine was built without more record because most of the information about the ancient ages can't be found, even if the information in the outward bound light was retrievable as I say may be possible herein, because it would be incomplete for half of the 24 hours the light was low frequency, and more information of worth is in other wavelengths than light..
Even so if the light holds the record of ancient events, this might help us find out about the history of the Cosmos.. We ask why the Cosmos isn't lit up by the lights of distant advanced civilizations..this could give us cautions about how to defend ours.
Others have considered the possibility of finding the ancient light. If we actually were able to retrieve the light, we may improve from there, but like when a fossil is dug often much is not viable to find about the ancient life and no guarantee would be that just the right information to make the Big Machine reliable would be found.
Perhaps some other way than via the historic record in the light would be found for rewinding the Big Machine. Einstein believed the machine would not be able to travel before the information is encoded, and feasibility issues would be of import even if a power source like fusion were available.
Feasibility aside if the machine is essentially a 3d printer based on a good enough record, and these are the two main elements, Einstein was wrong because this has nothing to do with when the machine was built, just the need for a good enough record. Even so feasibility would be the main limit for a large machine.
Eric Lerner and others are inventing fusion motors that use imploding electric fields to generate force that fuses well with a much more controlled flow when the protons are imploded by surrounding atoms. I think the problem with surrounding atoms is they will fuse with the fuel generating radioactive waste, other inventors like me have devised cleaner methods (see the atomic spin motor ). For my bestselling reducing radioactivity site click here.
If the light is like Einstein believed, or if the record in the quanta by the Higgs's laser were viable and a large source of the materials to rebuild the time to be visited with were achieved (in the time since the record was built) of where the machine could save to rewind was available, I think The Machine would be not impossible.
Physicists aren't dumb, and I think the problem of having to rebuild an ancient world to revisit it is why physicists haven't already built a time machine that has any worth to reverse it. The use of a one man time machine that would reedit smaller regions than the world by these methods from the teleportation science being developed may have future "value in the past"..
THE WAVE FUNCTION AS A SOURCE OF DATA FOR TIME SIMULATION AND LEARNING ABOUT ANCIENT LIFE HISTORY ETC..
Einstein and others believed that the collapse of the wave function was the cause of time. As I say (on this post CLICK HERE or see the same link at the end of the page you like) I believe that this can be proven to be only part of the cause of time because a lot of the events are encoded in the electromagnetic fields.
In other words as I say on the link we could take a crystal and send in the microwaves as with quantum computing in order to collapse all the wave functions at once. Time would radiate inward by the idea that the collapse of the wave function is fundamental, but actually as with thermodynamics we can't know the future yet because the energy from the Sun hasn't reached us yet to supply us with energy for time computations.
Nonetheless I believe that a major part of the contribution to the entropy that we are involved with with time is about the collapse of the wave function as Einstein believed.
More particularly I believe if we collapse the wave function of all the quanta of the crystal we get the results of our computation which is stored as the bond angles and the energies of the electrons of the atoms of the crystal. This might be how time computes and so the result would be that the collapse of the wave function and the entropy of the second law of thermodynamics both combine to give us the weighted values of the branching out of the thermodynamic entropy (otherwise of unknown cause).
This combination method would be how time computes.
In order to find a large amount of evidence about history like every day in history I think what we could do is simply take the quanta of the earth after they've collapsed the wave function of each and then read that like we're reading a quantum computer to find the information about every day in history.
Earthquakes, cosmic ray showers, lightning strikes, friction of different sorts all may combine to create a unique signature for the collapsed wavefunctions of that moment in history. And this may enable us not only to have value for legal use but also we can find out about the behavior of ancient life like dinosaurs.
While of course it seems improbable that we can build a large time machine anytime soon like Einstein or Wells considered, this might give us a way to make a really good simulation of time in history!
Some like Kip Thorne or Stephen Hawking who hope to use the relativistic speed of acceleration of black holes and other massive bodies as a time machine of sorts..I think they are limited by the lack of complexity of the massive fields.
While my idea of using the relativistic wind tunnel to perhaps slow time in the lab nearer to us would be about relative field motion and would be more viable to us, at least to slow time, using the field to speed it up or reverse time without a machine seems improbable.
Most of the information about our lives is of electric charges and electricity and caused by billions of years of evolution so you can't reverse complex electricity with simple gravity of massive fields because gravity won't act on all the particles in an exact rewind method like The Machine.
In evolution, computers and most other genius, the motifs start simple and go complex, this is how we evolved. Being wavelike, a massive source of gravity in GWD is just a sort of blob of mass. The field of our life is much more complex and would have to use precise relocation of points of mass to cause the teleportation.
Gravity pulling down to onennes, being the opposite of thermodynamics that lifts us up in my ideas of General Wave Dynamics GWD reverses time in general, but not exactly; acceleration of complex nonlinear waves seem necessary to hold the cosmos together and in GWD they wouldn't be via the *slow* speed of light which isn't a wave uninfluenced from emission to absorption as by Einstein's belief so the speed is constant unlike the acceleration of gravity.. I believe acceleration won't fit relativity.
Gravity pulling down to onennes, being the opposite of thermodynamics that lifts us up in my ideas of General Wave Dynamics GWD reverses time in general, but not exactly; acceleration of complex nonlinear waves seem necessary to hold the cosmos together and in GWD they wouldn't be via the *slow* speed of light which isn't a wave uninfluenced from emission to absorption as by Einstein's belief so the speed is constant unlike the acceleration of gravity.. I believe acceleration won't fit relativity.
As promised above the link is below!.. My page about how we may finally prove if the collapse of the wave function exists which is still in doubt after 100 years. On this post I also discuss how I think we can finally prove the weighted values of thermodynamic entropy as well as perhaps use the crystal as a cheap room temperature quantum computer with self-assembly in the test tube and also as a possible room temperature superconductor.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)