Dark Matter ; A Possible Solution By Way of "More Classical Electrodynamics"

While it's true that dark matter has been found to bend light as in galaxies or with high energy explosions like the pistol nebula which is the most high energy event in yet known by astronomers, for the pistol nebula, the dark matter goes through normal matter without any  influence other than the bending of light seen.

 It's been said that dark matter has no influence of any kind seen on any kind of matter other than light but this is not completely true because it's related to the extra mass of galaxies that's causing them all to spin faster than they should causing them to otherwise explode by centrifugal force and here too we see the bending of light.

Even so we can't find dark matter around us with mechanical, chemical, spectroscopic or other changes of this type.

  I've had the idea that dark matter and dark energy are closely related to gravity and centrifugal force.

For the pistol nebula we might say that since gravity and centrifugal force are found to not shield including gravity for eclipses or centrifugal force for metal plates, this might seem to be a first approximation for a solution to why dark matter doesn't cause these kind of common events we see around us in physics, even while the mass of galaxies causes bending of light and also even without the dark matter there to cause other changes with the pistol nebula, the light is bent in ways that show the dark matter is there.

Dwarf galaxies weigh a thousand times more than the light we see from the stars that would presumably be seen by the influence all this mass to cause fusion of the stars.

 My possible explanation for why these galaxies bend light by their gravity yet with not as much evidence of fusion is about how perhaps over great enough distance, the distance between the field lines would be enough for the waves between the field lines to increase in speed and change energy for inertia or gravity.

Here's a page about dwarf galaxies that says that the galaxies with less dense stars actually have more bending of light than galaxies with more closely packed stars which fits in with my idea that the external field is nonlinear. The site link says that they can explain the evolution of dwarf galaxies where they go from compact to diffuse later in the evolution by way of non gravitational radiation of some type (perhaps radiation pressure from the stars I might guess) but they don't seem to have a cause of the larger scale clumping once the dwarf galaxies are more diffuse.. see the same link at the end of my post if you like.

  Maxwell believed that the low energy medium can't be made of particles because if we weigh it it will be like a gas and it would have weight..

 Here again the dark matter has a lack of chemical or mechanical properties and so on.  This might be because the waves are more pure and they wrap around the outside of each heavy quanta but don't much influence the forces at shorter range.

The classical electromagnetic field lines  may need dark matter and dark energy waves between them to make them not bunch up or kink or break. 

I think of this dark matter as "cold" because as by Maxwell's idea it's not particulate or a gas which would radiate out like heat but instead the waves between the field lines would be more pure and with lower entropy causing the attraction having been derived from gravity and also holding the electromagnetic field lines together for the inertial dark matter.

 The lack of shielding for gravity and centrifugal force I had tended to believe was caused by what I call Line Removal, LR.

By this both gravity and centrifugal force would wrap around the outside of the heavy quanta like a sort of invisibility cloak and at the same time they measure the acceleration of gravity or the force of inertia by finding the difference between the spin on one limb and the other limb of the quanta for the net acceleration of gravity Etc.

We might account for the lack of the chemical or mechanical events seen for dark matter by this method. The acceleration is there but by line removal there's no more. This might be why Einstein believed that gravity is completely simple and it acts always the same for all masses.

 Even so, for the dwarf galaxies for example the realm of the dark matter and dark energy waves between the field lines might be considerably nonlinear and the same for inside the heavy quanta around us.. because in experiments a quantum goes in and five different quanta reradiate out and you can't predict which one will except by statistics..or for example when you have a bunch of heavy quanta and wait till they become radioactive. While you can know the half-life of that batch of quanta, you can't actually know when which one will radiate out first or when.

 As I say the zigzagging of the waves back and forth between the classical electromagnetic field lines would maintain their coherence and yet be nonlinear.

 So my possible explanation for why with events like the pistol nebula we can see the bending of the light and yet when the dark matter moves through the other matter we see no change whatsoever of the "other more mechanical" events, may be about nonlinear changes in the field lines.

With this kind of event the wave events between the quantum field lines essentially take on a life of their own after they're emitted by the plus or minus electric charges (this output by the waves between by more than input of the quanta is also common with QCD and the gluons) this is not found with the positive and negative charges that cause the snapback of the light by more usual events. By partially violating energy conservation this would also explain why the galaxies are spinning faster than by relativity. 

 So the lines radiate out over greater distance, the snapback increases, and this causes a greater bending of the light..

 But the plus and minus charges themselves aren't receiving information as much from that one-way flow from the charges to the light.

 By being nonlinear the external fields unlike the quanta  themselves are non-commutative or less so. For the pistol nebula this may be energy from the electromagnetic field and it's much higher energy than the gravity..

For the galaxies we see the light being bent and the galaxies are moving too fast for relativity also seemingly violating conservation of momentum.

 Unlike the pistol nebula, the bending of the light for a galaxy is being caused by the gravity of the galaxy. And as I say since gravity is at a much different energy than inertia, the mass density corresponding to the bending of the light may be different for high energy collisions seen and the amount of mass implied with galaxies.

 So if inertia and gravity aren't completely equivalent we might expect to find two different levels of bending of the light (two different types of dark matter events) depending on whether we see it by way of the gravity or the higher energy electromagnetic field more about inertia for the given assumed amount of dark matter. For the predicted amount of dark energy for a galaxy we might find a different amount of bending of the light than for the mass by the bending of the light of a high energy event like those seen without much gravity.

  Unlike what Einstein believed gravity has a source since Einstein like Mach thought inertia and gravity were much the same (otherwise a pendulum wouldn't stop towards the center of the earth after it slows down) and so as you get nearer and farther from the source of the dark matter caused by gravity you have more change in it than you will have by the inertial version of dark matter if this idea turns out to be viable.

Suppose we have a boson like light and a fermion like the + and - charges. Now suppose the dark matter force is bending the light and the heavier quantum.

 The light will bend and not the particles with rest mass because they're spinning faster than the speed of light inside for the extra mass like the proton where we can't find 97 percent of the mass, this would be the dark matter, and it also isn't interacting much with the strong force. As Tesla believed about gravity the Earth may be absorbing a large amount of energy all the time, yet we don't see this energy because most of it wraps around the outside of the heavy quanta and it's invisible mostly to gravity except in a roundabout way.

  The gravity waves would stream both in and out of the Earth with only a few interacting with the quanta of the Earth.

 

 The light has zero rest mass and so it spins inside only at the speed of light so here the energy conversion by the outside force on the light is 100%.. Fermions being heavier perhaps spin faster than the speed of light inside and so they have more gyroscopic stability unlike the light which gives way more completely to the force acting on it externally.

The dark matter is wrapping around the heavy quanta for the high energy events seen yet not having much influence on them just as when you move around the room you feel the force when you change speed but dark matter otherwise has been tough to find.

We say the positive and negative charges are sending out these waves that then reach the light to bend it more. 

(By Maxwell's method he used to predict the speed of light exactly, otherwise totally having nothing to do with it by way of Special Relativity, I would call this an astounding coincidence otherwise without cause by relativity.. waves like the matter waves in quantum mechanics can be faster than light because they're not being influenced as much by the quanta of relativity, and the waves going between the field lines would be a sort of invisible oil permeating all the fields operating between the field lines as a superfluid faster than light, but not gaining relativistic mass by way of the phase change and Line Removal to make the clockwork mechanical cosmos of the quanta continue in motion.. otherwise the Higgs particles would rapidly cause all the particles to stop spinning and linear motion to stop). For the positive and negative charges not to influence other positive and negative charges directly this would seem to imply that just that electron and positive charge are entangled with the light and no other.

  By this since it's much more common and easier to entangle the light with the electron and the positive charge than this because of Line Removal the quanta with mass bend the light but the light doesn't have as much influence on them. The quanta influence the light by a nonlinear event but they're entangled only with that light and no other and not with other heavy quanta. 

 Dark Matter wouldn't make the cosmos slow down by more attraction by acceleration like bending light more but rather this would only be caused by the electrostatic repulsion of the huge magnetic fields seen on the cosmic scale. For more about my ideas about cosmology see the link at the end of this post..

Summary;

In my belief gravitational and inertial mass are not completely equivalent.

 But radiating out more the classical field lines might allow the waves between them to move at higher speed and this connects to the light by the plus and minus charges to cause more bending of the light.

 The dark matter is actually between the field lines and wraps around the heavy quanta by what I call Line Removal LR, and this is why it has no mechanical or  other events.

The galaxies are spinning too fast and this will be because the dark matter is accelerating them and here the lines radiate out so much that the dark matter might cause the light to bend more.

 Because of gravitational and inertial mass not being completely equivalent, the bending of light for the galaxies will be a different amount and with different angles from the source than for other high energy events seen by astronomers with less mass present.

 If so massive dark energy is not equivalent to inertial dark energy.

Because the radiation out between the field lines is more distant from the electrons and positive charges for the inertial dark matter, and because the charges are only connected to that particular light by entanglement, the dark matter might influence the light but not the other quanta..

 Dwarf galaxies may have hugely more mass when they are more diffused compared to when they're compact because when the lines radiate out with more distance between them the force gets stronger perhaps thousands of times than the implied mass by the bending of light.

The quanta that send out the waves are only the source of them and the waves are non-commutative like the gluons in QCD so there's extra mass in this extra motion of the waves between the field lines and here would be where the dark matter is..

 I know all this may sound a bit hypothetical. I consider myself to be a traditionalist like Einstein thought of himself and while all this may seem to not be as traditional as the rest of a lot of my pages about physics, I think it's possible..

I'm a realist hoping to earn optimism, sometimes I might hope to earn more optimism than others!

While this is not my most important idea in physics it makes predictions and offers cause for the bending of light the spin of quanta and how gravity and inertia are transparent to mass.

Here is a possible explanation for what we find in cosmology if the cosmos is expanding where we are like the jets of a galaxy except on a huge scale.. the universe wasn't created out of nothing in this view instead it's been cycling internally with the magnetic fields going out of the jets and back around the disc and repeating.. 

..one value of this is that the center of the cosmos is there with stable gravity and this allows the formation of structures like the Great Wall since the local expansion of the cosmos at our jet began, because even with inflation cosmology gravity might be much faster yet causing the galaxies to form sooner also with more force being communicated between the center of the cosmos by the faster than light connection by gravity, otherwise the galaxies wouldn't have formed this soon as seen from sensors like the Webb Telescope perhaps 200 million years from what otherwise would have been thought to be the moment of creation and this creation would otherwise violate energy conservation, one of the most well founded ideas in the history of science...Click Here for my page about this, "Cosmic Jet Cosmology."

Here again is the link to the Scitech Daily site about how dwarf galaxies with less dense stars actually bend light more than other galaxies. This was something I didn't know about while I was devising this method until I looked it up for my research and found this also Click Here..

Einstein said the first 99 times he got it wrong and the hundredth time he got it right..For a general page I consider to be the most complete of the 40 years I've been researching about this click here..The advent of an old science is always more wise than the health of wisdom!