They are finding in brain research that we have many things determined by evolution that aren't just about learning. Einstein's brain had more developed and unusual parietal structures, used to process spatial and numerical motifs. And identical twins have a great range of common traits (These twins Theresa an Lisa who own a shop where I live here, they've seen sales, seen a mall!)
-
The brain has structures that are determined in shape by genes and these shapes determine if the person is bright or a engineer. While this is causing many to say that what we inherit is of more import than what we learn, some may hope all the people with genes that were "poor" would perhaps be not allowed to try to win more.
-
Obviously evidence for both evolution and learned behaviour will be seen in any complex part of life, life is complex, more complex than just a villa and a GPS machine to map it. And you hear all this like in biology where they say about form and function, it's turned out the question of which is more important has turned out to be meaningless, they are so much unified by millions of years of evolution, thay're the same in all life science. But life is motion even if the overall rate of evolution is slow, change is the opposite of this.
-
If they were exactly the same they would be so much in balance no change would take place, and evolution would have stopped ages ago (Unlike a slow stop Sign that says GO to top 40 ). Like the gravity of the earth flowing in at one wavelength and the heat out at another, I would hold that evolution and learning or form and function are two different ways of life that are in balance, but one or the other would be of more worth on a day to day basis in general just as in a healthy world worth usually wins out over error. If evolution and learned behaviour are the same in all senses nothing we could achieve would change anything. Gravity or heat, form or function, hot or cool, bad or good, one or the other is going to generally be of more worth to us. (Air is a marathon, heat is when my brightbells have memory foam!) While you may say about causology and experiment, both are essential if science wins out, and neither is of more worth than the other, change and savvy is of worth to more of our life than no change, all is in motion in life science, so I think we win more with labor than with talent. This is if most of us won't be the boss or be a Roman in ancient times, so being strong and labor and what we learn may be of more value to most (If you see a high heel footwear at the beach, fathers's boss mom, has arrived!) There were always a lot more labor than bosses in evolution, "Life works out the most optimal for those who make the most of life".
-
There will always be evidence for both evolution and learned behavior in what we see. But learned behaviour I think is more important because life is change, what evolution we receive, learning may make it even that much more so.
-
There will always be evidence for both evolution and learned behavior in what we see. But learned behaviour I think is more important because life is change, what evolution we receive, learning may make it even that much more so.
-
