50% MORE LAND For Us (In Perhaps 150 Years).
As I say on my site about overpopulation as our room is reduced this may cause us problems with increased Competition for decreased Resources, (like in economics) causing debt and finally not enough room for us to breathe. So how to find land will be of real worth to the world of 2158? One method may be to find ways to bulldoze the land of mountains like the mountains of the W. U.S. and move the earth into the ocean building more land in the ocean and also reclaiming all the unused land of the mountains by making them level. It's a heavy load to lift with bulldozers, so instead creative values may allow us to be able to move a medium sized asteroid by way of moving a small one; the small rock's mass (after being swerved by the laser or other beam) moves the big block our way
or to the orbit of a more massive body like a satellite of Jupiter. This massive orb would then be moved out of its orbit via the gravity of the asteroid. The large moon of this origin would then likewise be aimed to the earth's own moon and be in the correct path to move our own moon inward to a nearer orbit by gravity when it would pass by, moving it via the gravity. This would be a geostationary orbit. It would make colonization of the moon much cheaper. A highway between the earth and moon could be built, to send air, water and so on pumped mostly by the gravity of the moon up to the rooms dug under the moons surface. (And the Earths of the solar system like our world would be larger than all others when zoomed and hi res!). This would change the tides, so perhaps a proximal asteroid in diurnal (24 hour) rotation would be a substitute for the tides so life would have them.
The moving plan which was invented by a NASA scientist, and my improvement of just using a laser or other beam instead of a booster of other sort like a machine to move the small masses path to the medium, to the large, would cost almost nothing if achieved slow to move Mars nearer to the Earth. A technician at NASA was trying to find a way in the distant future to move the Earth itself away from the heat of the Sun in the billions of years from now by this method where the gravity of the moon from another source zooming near us would move the earth farther away from the heat of the sun in its later evolution. Changes in the orbit of the Moon or Mars would be cheap and viable if slow and I think it may perhaps be achieved in just years not thousands of years by augumentation of the speeds of the asteroids with machines like boosters.
In the more distant future, this method of moving asteroids may even be used to move Mars nearer the Earth so they would be a double planet, and since mars would be warmer, the ice caps of CO2 would melt. We would be able to reach Mars in just a few minutes or seconds, and the bad air of Mars would be removed or processed with much air from the Earth in a sort of roadway between the Earth and Mars which would now be our own Earth II. The tube could be shielded if terrorists attacked or made of super strong materials like Proton Solids or made retractable. It may also be just made of wire because of low gravity between the two unified worlds and much reduced since lower power to boost payloads would be used than the Space Tower as they now conceive it, the same speed of payloads with lower gravity would be achieved with a much lighter tower. (To boost beyond the Moon or Earth II the gravity would boost the payload up generally. and before it actually hit the moon or mars the payload would go to the side and beyond without impact.)
Another way to reclaim more land on the earth would be to pump the water from the Earth's oceans to form oceans on Mars/Earth II if moved near to us lowering the world's sea level to reduce the import of such as global warming and adding much land on the earth to live on while adding an ocean of worth to Mars. No doubt this is in the more distant future since it would take time to move Mars. Just using this to move Mars nearer the earth in general itself would be of real worth and low cost. And we could try the science by moving the moon nearer first. Moving Mars nearer and into Earth orbit would give us much better access to colonize Mars than just leaving Mars where it is or moving it to 93 million miles from the Sun like the Earth, but not in Earth orbit. Mars has exactly the same amount of surface area as the Earth has land other than the ocean, so we would be doubling our land in this future scenario.
Moving Mars would be more expensive so another plan for moon colonization would be to make weights out of Super Dense Material and drop them to the center of the moon via a drilled well, creating enough mass to make it so the moon would be able to hold air and water via increased gravity of the superdense solid weights. Protons might hold well together by condensing them in supercold physics and at near radius the magnetic field is much more powerful overpowering the coulumb barrier so they would be even more like the Bose Einstein Condensate and be more permanently frozen in a superdense mass so the electric charges of the protons would be overpowered to make a BEC even at room temperature. I envision this as somewhat like superpressure where using machines to compress the solid, compounds otherwise thought to be incompressable at STP actually have just 1/3 the size.
The drilling method may be used for more common mining here to make it viable as in this link; A GEOLOGISTS WWW. To make the moon have as much gravity as the earth would take less matter if it were more dense. The attraction of all the mass is for all the rest (especially when more are present) and much higher so it would take much less of the hadron solid to make the moon massive enough to hold air and water.
Carl Sagan in Cosmos says they consider plans to synthesize a more Earthlike atmosphere on Mars with perhaps 100 or 1000 years to the completion of this goal. But if a mill to make these super solids by perhaps cheap self assembling machines were put on the moon or mars it might take just 30 years to make the moon massive enough to hold air or water. Sagan says too in Cosmos if you had an ounce of the mass of solid of this sort (like the matter of a dense star) and you dropped it it would go through the Earth and out the other side, then the gravity would reaccelerate it in rebound through the Earth, with the friction slowing it a bit more each time. It would settle in the core by slowing of the cycles which finally would stop the oscillation. What he didn't realize was about shielding. Neutrons would be unviable to drop because they are radioactive and would decay, with explosion. Protons while stable even if in lumps while in acceleration through the earth would ionize all the electrons in the atoms nearby causing friction by the electric field lines that would overcome most or all of the downward motion, reducing efficiency with a larger and larger lump of mass (electromagnetism has a much stronger mass density than gravity). So either the outside of the hadron solid would have to be shielded, perhaps with diamonds if of protons, or the solid would just be of neutrons, but unless good ways are found to make them stable, the probe would have to be heavy to sink fast because the neutron just has a half life of about 12 minutes. The method of this plan would be to first dig a well from the moons's surface to the center, blast out a large round room, then make a liner for the shield, perhaps out of the pulverized rock from the conventional blast (conventional so no heavy radiation to combine with the protons).
As I say on my site about overpopulation as our room is reduced this may cause us problems with increased Competition for decreased Resources, (like in economics) causing debt and finally not enough room for us to breathe. So how to find land will be of real worth to the world of 2158? One method may be to find ways to bulldoze the land of mountains like the mountains of the W. U.S. and move the earth into the ocean building more land in the ocean and also reclaiming all the unused land of the mountains by making them level. It's a heavy load to lift with bulldozers, so instead creative values may allow us to be able to move a medium sized asteroid by way of moving a small one; the small rock's mass (after being swerved by the laser or other beam) moves the big block our way
or to the orbit of a more massive body like a satellite of Jupiter. This massive orb would then be moved out of its orbit via the gravity of the asteroid. The large moon of this origin would then likewise be aimed to the earth's own moon and be in the correct path to move our own moon inward to a nearer orbit by gravity when it would pass by, moving it via the gravity. This would be a geostationary orbit. It would make colonization of the moon much cheaper. A highway between the earth and moon could be built, to send air, water and so on pumped mostly by the gravity of the moon up to the rooms dug under the moons surface. (And the Earths of the solar system like our world would be larger than all others when zoomed and hi res!). This would change the tides, so perhaps a proximal asteroid in diurnal (24 hour) rotation would be a substitute for the tides so life would have them.
The moving plan which was invented by a NASA scientist, and my improvement of just using a laser or other beam instead of a booster of other sort like a machine to move the small masses path to the medium, to the large, would cost almost nothing if achieved slow to move Mars nearer to the Earth. A technician at NASA was trying to find a way in the distant future to move the Earth itself away from the heat of the Sun in the billions of years from now by this method where the gravity of the moon from another source zooming near us would move the earth farther away from the heat of the sun in its later evolution. Changes in the orbit of the Moon or Mars would be cheap and viable if slow and I think it may perhaps be achieved in just years not thousands of years by augumentation of the speeds of the asteroids with machines like boosters.
In the more distant future, this method of moving asteroids may even be used to move Mars nearer the Earth so they would be a double planet, and since mars would be warmer, the ice caps of CO2 would melt. We would be able to reach Mars in just a few minutes or seconds, and the bad air of Mars would be removed or processed with much air from the Earth in a sort of roadway between the Earth and Mars which would now be our own Earth II. The tube could be shielded if terrorists attacked or made of super strong materials like Proton Solids or made retractable. It may also be just made of wire because of low gravity between the two unified worlds and much reduced since lower power to boost payloads would be used than the Space Tower as they now conceive it, the same speed of payloads with lower gravity would be achieved with a much lighter tower. (To boost beyond the Moon or Earth II the gravity would boost the payload up generally. and before it actually hit the moon or mars the payload would go to the side and beyond without impact.)
Another way to reclaim more land on the earth would be to pump the water from the Earth's oceans to form oceans on Mars/Earth II if moved near to us lowering the world's sea level to reduce the import of such as global warming and adding much land on the earth to live on while adding an ocean of worth to Mars. No doubt this is in the more distant future since it would take time to move Mars. Just using this to move Mars nearer the earth in general itself would be of real worth and low cost. And we could try the science by moving the moon nearer first. Moving Mars nearer and into Earth orbit would give us much better access to colonize Mars than just leaving Mars where it is or moving it to 93 million miles from the Sun like the Earth, but not in Earth orbit. Mars has exactly the same amount of surface area as the Earth has land other than the ocean, so we would be doubling our land in this future scenario.
Moving Mars would be more expensive so another plan for moon colonization would be to make weights out of Super Dense Material and drop them to the center of the moon via a drilled well, creating enough mass to make it so the moon would be able to hold air and water via increased gravity of the superdense solid weights. Protons might hold well together by condensing them in supercold physics and at near radius the magnetic field is much more powerful overpowering the coulumb barrier so they would be even more like the Bose Einstein Condensate and be more permanently frozen in a superdense mass so the electric charges of the protons would be overpowered to make a BEC even at room temperature. I envision this as somewhat like superpressure where using machines to compress the solid, compounds otherwise thought to be incompressable at STP actually have just 1/3 the size.
The drilling method may be used for more common mining here to make it viable as in this link; A GEOLOGISTS WWW. To make the moon have as much gravity as the earth would take less matter if it were more dense. The attraction of all the mass is for all the rest (especially when more are present) and much higher so it would take much less of the hadron solid to make the moon massive enough to hold air and water.
Carl Sagan in Cosmos says they consider plans to synthesize a more Earthlike atmosphere on Mars with perhaps 100 or 1000 years to the completion of this goal. But if a mill to make these super solids by perhaps cheap self assembling machines were put on the moon or mars it might take just 30 years to make the moon massive enough to hold air or water. Sagan says too in Cosmos if you had an ounce of the mass of solid of this sort (like the matter of a dense star) and you dropped it it would go through the Earth and out the other side, then the gravity would reaccelerate it in rebound through the Earth, with the friction slowing it a bit more each time. It would settle in the core by slowing of the cycles which finally would stop the oscillation. What he didn't realize was about shielding. Neutrons would be unviable to drop because they are radioactive and would decay, with explosion. Protons while stable even if in lumps while in acceleration through the earth would ionize all the electrons in the atoms nearby causing friction by the electric field lines that would overcome most or all of the downward motion, reducing efficiency with a larger and larger lump of mass (electromagnetism has a much stronger mass density than gravity). So either the outside of the hadron solid would have to be shielded, perhaps with diamonds if of protons, or the solid would just be of neutrons, but unless good ways are found to make them stable, the probe would have to be heavy to sink fast because the neutron just has a half life of about 12 minutes. The method of this plan would be to first dig a well from the moons's surface to the center, blast out a large round room, then make a liner for the shield, perhaps out of the pulverized rock from the conventional blast (conventional so no heavy radiation to combine with the protons).
My more recent solutions here involve where we could use super pressure and supercooling to compress ordinary elements of higher mass number than hydrogen to higher density as has been achieved with superpressure except to higher density using related methods of solving instability here too by what I name Super Dense Gravitational Nuclear SDGN matter. This may be of use to us eventully as for better mining and research about gravity and so on as I say here.
With many of the super dense weights building up the gravity of the moon, an icy moon could be then crashed in the side of the moon by the cheap asteroid moving motif (in blue at top) and this would give the moon spin and precession and a source of air, water and other minerals. The moon would be set spinning and with precession so it wouldn't be too hot or cool for usual summer old gold beach revels.They say the water they found on the moon may be worth billions of dollars for the oxygen to breathe with and the hydrogen for rocket fuel. So it would be of worth too to move a mass like a comet in lunar orbit (with enough shade by an umbrella so the ice would stay solid). And crashing enough asteroids mass or comets of the right composition into Mars before we colonize would make more materials and add atmosphere and and heat by the impact making Mars a less hostile realm, and allowing the cells that would use the air water and nutrients by gene engineering to convert more of the atmosphere of Mars (many plants generate more heat than animals like a lion per the same weight). This may be of worth to heat mars and convert the sunlight, carbon dioxide, and water to more oxygen, speeding up the time of any real colonization (without risk of half hour Insurance infomercials!).
The moon may also be shielded by the use of magnetic bubble technology, a magnetic bubble would be put between the earth and moon where the gravity would mostly make shade rotate with the moon's near side in an orbit of one month. This shade by refracting a lot of the incoming heat away from the moon, would make it easier to colonize, and when the earth facing side of the moon was in the part of the month with no light, mirrors could reflect more heat to the moon, this too in perhaps 30-100 years.
.
