Black Hole Dynamics, and The Asymmetry of Mass and Energy

 Here I ask what powers supermassive bodies like black holes and why the jets are observed to be mostly symmetrical, and as I say on the posts that follow, the asymmetry of mass and energy may be why black holes only have 50 % of the mass predicted by the implosion of the ghost particles. Here I want to say more "in light of the shade of supermassive fields" as in the post below also, about Mercini Houghton's idea that black holes can't even exist based on her idea that due to Hawking radiation, all the mass is radiant and no black holes are even possible.

  As I say, much the observational evidence about all the mass being dragged around the centers of galaxies with darkness seen at the source (I've been framed by my luxury sweet optician!) tells us that Mercini Houghton is wrong.

   My video is about the asymmetry of mass and energy (Encyclopedia Comp video) this may be about how e.g. mass is much easier to convert to energy, and e.g. about the electron having more mass but less energy, and the positron has more energy but less mass and mass is heavy while energy is light relates to this.  Einstein makes them equivalent but relativity can't make them equal. In my idea GWD, this is why Dirac's attempt to unify relativity failed because mass and energy in relativity are completely equivalent in quantum mechanics theoretically, yet there is more matter or mass than antimatter, like energy in our world.  If the proton is more with union with the plus charge, this is why there is more mass, mass and energy are asymmetric.

   And as I say here, this would resolve why black holes weigh only about half as much as the ghost particle method of inward radiance of the supermassive fields allow. Another reason Mercini Houghton 's idea may be wrong is about my idea that gravity and inertia are distinct as I say below. Like Mach, Einstein believed gravity and inertia were essentially the same thing, so the speed of inertia may be what LIGO has recently found. Or it could be  a goof of the machine like the OPERA or BICEP2. As I say below gravity being hugely lighter than light, may move much much faster, my hopeful generalization of Maxwell's method as I say on my Physics Synopsis page see link upper left of page. Radiant Hawking reradiation at the event horizon may radiate inward because of gravity's super speed especially even just inside the event horizon where the speed might be faster than light, a speed even ghostly particles may not be able to reach.

  You may have heard of the paradox of the firewall, a zone here where there would be radiance due to the tide of the massive stretch even on the quanta by gravity. I explain this by the same contradiction around us all the time. Quanta are discontinuous, gravity seems smooth, as Einstein believed. The resolution would be by what I have called Field Line Removal. The field inside a black hole is implosive to the point where gravity creates the quanta with enough pressure to start to re radiate out, and there is no gravity or huge gravity of the electron around us here. Yet by renormalization or scattering experiments, the electron has large mass inside. It's a sort of antigravity, to lift us up against the gravity. It would flow in the spaces between the quanta, and gravity has no quantum numbers or shielding. So while all the quanta would be derived from gravity, they don't know it, and like the proverbial creator of gravity set the world in motion, the world is often unaware of what the gravity is about.

 So the fields are unified generally yet there is distinction. If gravity creates the quanta, I would hold that the reverse is possible, it could shred the ghost particles as they fall in the event horizon below a certain level of radius here. First the Hawking radiation might convert the virtual quanta to real, and then with the asymmetry of the mass and energy, the heavy positive charge falls in. Hawking believes that a large black hole can only increase in mass and I agree since this is what gravity tends to do. It has more binding energy than the radiant quanta, or we would fall off the Earth.  The event horizon would yank away the plus charge so it falls in by distinction and it being heavier a bit increases the mass.

 Once this particle falls in enough, I believe it may also be shredded to gravity waves and the firewall is also rapidly shredded with the implosion of the mass into the area of the deep event horizon. All the information isn't lost or destroyed. The higher quantum information is shredded up while the more basic momentum is conserved. Higher information is often lost e.g. a wall can be a shelf and even so its basic atoms are much the same. I believe higher information is not always conserved as in information theory, while we are alive and don't live indefinitely, some forms of life, like cities and businesses are theoretically without death. They live slow and live for ages, while our life is fast and we don't live as long..

  All this like Hawking radiation seems to follow from basic physics. Once the implosion of the field reaches the singularity I disagree with Einstein or Hawking. I agree with T'hooft that the energy isn't destroyed into infinite implosion. To save energy conservation as T'hooft says I invoke faster than light spin of a fifth and sixth force to stand counteract the implosion by the superstrong centrifugal force.

 The dynamics of the jets would use Field Line removal also to unify and polarize considerably. Here the magnetic type NS zones of the superfusion wouldn't be as much quantized much like electric charges, so by the squeezing of the force they move upward in the massive gravity.. Gravity is mostly removed inside the jets, even so some of the gravity is there moving in the opposite way and I believe this would be disproof of Relativity.


 You might wonder of Field Line removal of electrons and the superfusion method needs to be faster than light to outachieve the gravity, and if the FL removal is a sort of antigravity for both, wouldn't this mean the electron also spins at faster than light? It's interesting that Einstein rejected the Kaluza Klein method of higher dimensional spin in his belief about the unified field. It would fit the idea of FL removal if we assume indeed that the electron spins inside at faster than light, my belief is that if mass is spinning energy, if the electron has much internal mass it would also have more spin than relativity allows. Why does the muon weigh?  Relativity says nothing of the cause of rest mass, but the fractional charges of QCD are about a third reduced in electric charge compared to the electron so if they lighten up to go that much higher speed, this is the speed of Chao's experiments. Einstein may have not believed in the Kaluza Klein method for two reasons; it would be based on essentially FL removal and this won't allow a unified field mostly; and if the electron spins at faster than light inside, of course this would disprove relativity.


 As I say on the posts below, two Japanese physicists of the early 90's found that a gyroscope has weight reduced as it spins one way, the other way it weighs the same. This also would be about mass energy asymmetry since it would be also why the black holes have 50% of the mass the ghost particle method would predict.  If mass and energy are not the same then mass and weight are also distinct. So the black hole has about half the weight yet the same mass. Here too, the asymmetry of mass and energy is why the black hole gains mass yet at half the rate. With the Hawking radiation half the mass is imploded, and at the singularity, half the mass has radiance only.

  So far the evidence shows that there are the jets, and to me they seem superluminal since they must out radiate the gravity to remove outside the event horizon at the polar regions of the superstrong gravity. Evidence shows black holes to have a dynamo of electric charge, like a huge Van De Graff machine.

 All this dynamo motion would need some connection between the inside and the outside of the massive body, yet if the escape velocity is c as with LIGO, and gravity is at the speed of light and relativity is the limit, no outward information about the jets or even the gravity if it's only inward would be allowed by the speed of light.

One question Hawking might ask about is if all those particles of one charge mostly fall into the black hole, why it doesn't build up much charge and explode. This would be caused by the fifth and sixth force having more extra negative charge, and the would perhaps combine with the leftover superfusion charges powering the jets. The electromagnetic field favors the negative electric charge the strong force favors the plus charge, the proton, the weak force like electromagnetism favors negative entropy and charge so and the fifth force inside would favor positive charge by the reversal of sign between the layers of field, and the sixth force also might favor the positive entropy.

 The jets are mostly symmetric. As I earlier sought to unify gravity to e.g. other forces before I realized Field Removal would mostly be of value while not absolute as a way to allow Einstein's idea of a unified field (low energy quantum experiments show he was partially right as we would expect with partial FLR methods) I asked why if gravity is much like the other forces and they have an in out N S field we might expect to be on a South Beach diet up in Baffin Island by the N radiation outward with gravity! This seems strong evidence against a unified field. What are we left with, I hold, is with some residual quantum component of gravity, the poles of the supermassive gravity might have some distinction, because Einstein here wasn't all wrong either.

Even so I ask why was he mostly wrong about this? Because gravity isn't mostly a quantum. If gravity creates the other fields and it's a wave then waves are the foundation.  Particles have sides and don't radiate in like a gas. Einstein said it seems impossible to imagine a fundamental particle that could both  emit and absorb waves. So the jets of black holes are symmetrical because gravity is a sphere by the waves around the supermassive zone Einstein was spooked about the infinite implosion.

 If the waves wrap around and there is no beaming for gravity with the supernovas, a roughly equal number of the superfusion particles of both N and S would radiate out with the jets.


  The reason we don't sail away from the Earth's N or S is because gravity waves would be smaller than a neutron so the electromagnetic "thermodynamic" speed of light of Special Relativity would be of value here. A mass of F=ma moves slower if larger, as expected if it had some sort of surface of resistance to the external Higgs' particles, so it moves slower with the same force than the smaller mass. But the particles would have a zone of shielding like gravity if the size of a mass around us and there is no shielding. And as Einstein noted, there seems to be evidence that mass isn't electromagnetic, even with the all powerful speed of light in relativity. So I hope to save this thermodynamic influence for my science afterlife, by the idea that the bubble is the same volume as F=ma but of short enough radius to make it so when you take a + and - to make a heavy charge of mass like a meson or baryon, the mass isn't gone when you combine them to a 0  charge.

See my posts below about how the superfluidity of this field may allow solution to the problem about the Higgs' slowing all motion to stop with friction and other problems this idea of mine Modified La Sage Gravity MLSG.


As I say, the anomalous spectra of the jets tells us of new science unseen by common methods.

 The superfusion particles are the source of cosmic rays and they may be stable only with super massive force of pressure, they radiate out to the common metabolites around us. For some reason the quanta themselves don't fizzle to the level of the gravity waves. Since all forces radiate or gravitate to electromagnetism, evidence for the great influence of "thermodynamic" relativity, the stability of the electron or photon seems to relate to the tendency for the gravity to implode and the balance of the gravity with the quanta with both radiance and inward reradiance seems to me to be a deep impression of symmetry theory.

  The gravity is imbalanced mostly and the quanta are balanced charges, so gravity balances the electromagnetism, answering Einstein's question about why the electron has the charge and mass it does and why it's stable. There must be stability somewhere for us to exist. I believe the anthropic idea is silly since all the constants we are supposed to be so awed by just reaching where we are are always a balance of two opposites, and life would be at any level, all we need is balance for computation. If the constants were changed somewhat, other constants that would also be balanced by the action reaction pairs of energy conservation and Noether's theorem says nothing about the way each pair has it's aspect, merely that they balance in a cosmic center of moderation..