3d  PRINTERS AND THE ECONOMY

  3d printers some say may print all there is perhaps including baked goods, houses (a pixel is a brick filled with foam), even recycling the ink and virus printers. You read of Tim Berners Lee inventor of the internet on Christmas day 1990, he had one web page and one machine, and what  to link was his woe. He always said the internet should be in reach of all machines, and above all at no cost. More recently Lee promotes this cost for sites such as Facebook that he holds are walled off zones that can't be copied to the other reams. He believes these sites if too substantial would threaten the worth of the web for all. This seems like a fab Beatles house printout, like the web was first imagined by Edison, No not automatic writing like Houdini, rather Winston Churchill's same portent of the internet in the 1940's.  Lee ignores the publishing and information business, 50% of the economy. You may think of music as big about copyright, but this is only 5% of the information work like software, financial advisors who forecast weather as well as a doctor who forecasts the weather! There is some money in streaming it seems while the publishing industry is or may be in ruins due to the web, though methods like the ISP tax could help..actually authors are now hoping to unite with codes so they will still be paid by new methods unfounded a few years ago. What did Nabster Nab.

 Copyright is the basic level of IP, trademark is the middle level and patent is the higher level of activity here.. If the web has dissolved copyright already, imagine a world with no inventors being paid, where no one is rich, there are no stores, the economy is of just a much fewer number of products, most of them ink or durable goods, like manufacturing burgers, where mining, service industries and food processing may be the least affected yet though we have all the goods we want cheap since anyone can print out a lamp or hot dish top, there may be even fewer good jobs than now with the internet because people won't go to the store to buy stuff when they can just print it out. Cars or trains couldn't be so easily printed out, though the price from a reliable source to ensure safety and quality could still be rather high. I go to the store and see the value of VISAs and a millionare just looks at the prices. I think like the rich I know so much! We imagine there is a positive side of this, you go in the store left and many of your buys are much cheaper.

Even so with 3d printers we may have all we want of some things and they are cheap, but with less jobs most people would have less money to buy food or pay charities doctors or the police. President Truman would say that most people are energised by the creative people, and without them it would be less enriching. He would say the other people owe their livelyhood to them."

Some say they wouldn't even be willing to pay a 5$ ISP tax in the respect to the 50% of the economy in information work already involved with this and this seems like energising stimulants work, they seem to give energy by stressing one part of the system to give energy to another. Even so there tends to be burnout for most in the general sense for most stimulants other than more natural ones.


 Solutions

Lee mentions Facebook with woe and like a musical coffin they charge 20 to find out if comfortable (and as if for relaxation!). He says it's restricting information yet this sounds like the pre BC Before Computer publishing. Access was limited to information and only in reach for a fee via booksellers, at least for new books or RN Weather Maps. This didn't stop the world from sound 45 rpm sounds making musicians feel of worth.

 If you are a web author why not consider making your site  with paid access just as Lee has warts about. The more authoors aren't cheaping out, the more often all will be paid. I'm considering this at least partially, even if no one reads my sites at least I would be helping save the economy! Think of me too, thanks...


 Second, the ISP tax may be better. More people could be rich so more wealth for all. One important thing saving IP or inventors rights would allow is a way out of poverty for people who were smart and poor, say Einstein Twain or Edison. He knows the worth of bread who hasn't had enough to eat. It's a higher nature for the poor to get richer, for millions of years they were, or evolution would have stopped. It's been seen that in the US there are all kinds of people crossing from poverty to wealth each month, and this seems as it should be.

 Also more and more authors can sign up for sites like Amazon Create space that pay well at no cost to the author. (With Create space, more than just words are allowed, and the author doesn't have to author an entire book, allowing more authors than many ebook businesses). If enough authors sign up, supply goes down, and prices paid will again be like after the late 1700's, when the business of authors arrived. (Shakespeare and none of the ancients ever made a living as authors.)

And for the 3d printers a more elaborate way may be used to essentially not treat inventors like third world economies, or stores out of business and the bad economy. There are now patents on machines that jolt heavy particles like in the atom to hopefully create matter waves, known to exist by Einstein's relativity and "recently proven" by measuring pulsar's rate of decelleration as the radiance is radiant. We know how strong a shock will create the radiation and that they are in this range. What this may make is a really good sensor. As in to find out where all the printers are and what's been printed.

 I envisioned a use of other radar sensors like ones in use the size of a light that sense the heartbeat and breathing on the other side of a wall even a three foot concrete wall to document who was there by the unique way we breathe and our special heart health, sort of like a voice print or UPS signup where your x is the only one like it in the box or outside the box. In Mexico the painters pay taxes by selling their pictures at auction and in Norway they sign the paint with their fingerprint so no forgeries, complex fingerprints like Ben Franklin's leaf copies on each bill unlike others have power to foil bogus cash, In Gutenberg he trusted .

 The radar if used like on UAV's (drones) is good but it would be jammed by metal so while we would be able to find say who's in good health or has had a heart attack, great for ER visits, the best use would be limited since the bad people would just buy shielding like aluminum foil for the walls.

  Since the gravity wave sensors just use heavy particles and they would fit on a UAV, this might make a good surveillance device in general. Since gravity doesn't shield it would be useful for census and solving murders and for freeing the 50,000 servants who "Reader's Digest believes" are being held in the US in households e.g to do forced labor for the owner. Experts say there's little hope they would be saved and using this type of drones might save them.

  About the printers and copyright these and the stuff they print could be sensed by the drones. All printers if found to be in error would have chips to stop them by Wifi connection and so on. This reminds me of Orrin Hatch, senior congressman also a songwriter who actually sells about 100,000$ worth of song rights a year for his songs. Hatch hoped to pass laws so if anyone downloaded a song wrong from say ITunes, their PC would be stopped by distant explosion of the machine. Since gravity waves don't reflect the best way to sense say who is in a house might be to use a signal on the ground sent to the drone that is over the horizon yet in a line between the machines.

You might say gravity is real weak, so it wouldn't give high enough resolution. I believe gravity may whiz between heavier mass in the room between them mostly, thus not stopping much essentially because of the conservation laws. CLICK HERE Even so gravity can't implode infinitely because it would be infinite, and the heavier fields interact with the field even if field exclusion would be the cause of disproof of gravity, e.g. by the "antigravity" of electromagnetism lifting us up inside to stop the gravity from downward force. Thus there are two forces as usual, the gravity, and the electromagnetism of each mass, and a zone between them where they are in balanced. Gravity has power to push us down in the sofa, so I believe each zone of field has gravity as strong as the heavier field, the zone outside each atom and so on. This means even if the IP machines use gravity, it may have high enough resolution to find more than a blob.


 If the printerbots won, our world would be more like a third world economy. This would reduce the money of countries like the chinese importers, and if we try to make our economy "artificially elevated" to hold on to our wealth there would be much temptation for unlawful outside business. This would be inside the economy and also from outside also. Only by a real good method of sensing what is where and a reliable way to stop the counterfeiters of shelves, walls and labor stations is this possible. I had believed this like the problem with Orin Hatch's solution would be limited by the unfeasibility of all the legal costs of enforcing the rules still saving IP and the economy. The main cost for the printers would be in finding where they are, what they've printed and sensing if they have the chip. If cheap reliable sensors and a way to enforce the IP laws were available here, the main costs would be reduced and more.. A false 911 alarm costs municipalities 350$.