Weather Control Simulation Machines Via Physics

Physicists are now using experiments they hope to learn of events out of reach like the Big Bang when they slam plasmas in the laborotory to see if they act like the membranes or branes invoked by some cosmologists to explain the observed smoothness of the cosmos, or to see if Hawking Radiation exists with physics like a waterfall and a fish that goes in water faster than light, with real water and real radiation, it's thought this may be proven or disproven, or at least with more certainty. While the giant membranes suposedly explain the smoothness of the cosmos by way of high speed expansion smoothing out the cosmos, this is recently disproven by The Wilkenson Probe which shows the cosmos on the largest scale to have a giant dot in the center and two ears on the sides. And the branes are not an explanation of where the cosmos came from, it just moves back the explanation of what caused the cosmos a second or two more, but is not a much better solution, it violates the second law of thermodynamics, that energy is neither created or destroyed. So one caution of using experiments to simulate physics may be whether the initial conditions may be even much the same, other than this, I think the idea is a good one, this might be a lot more physics worthy than in a science like biology, because physics is not so probablistic, laws like energy conservation have never failed (for hundreds of years!) but biology, unlike physics, resists simple math. A better explanation of the geometry of the cosmos than branes (since it's now proven to be nonuniform by the Wilkenson Starship) may be Vortex Generator Cosmology with circulation in perpetual motion out the jets and in the whirlpool of the cosmos then returning ot the jets in continual circulation, this may explain much in cosmology. The central dot would be the center of the jet and the ears on the side would be where the speed of the motion of the outside cone of the jet was most headed to us and so it would have more radiance in the image. Another Wilkenson finding was that the cosmos also has a cosmic equator and this would be explained by the disc of the cosmos being like more usual equatorial bands of galaxies, in the larger realm of the cosmos.

Possible ways to weather control have been devised. One problem is about knowing whether the machine will work beforehand. Computers are not yet powerful enough so the resolution of the cells of the storm is too low. As in the above a way to know beforehand if a weather control machine would work may be to achieve experiments with physical machines, the same way engineers build mockup rivers and oceans to test small ships or in windtunnels to test air flow.


How To Simulate Hurricanes

Eric Lerner in his book The Big Bang Never Happened offers support for nobel prize laureate Hans Alfven about plasmas. Plasmas are hot ionized gases. One proof Lerner uses in favor of plasma physics being of import in the history of the cosmos is about plasmas holding galaxies solid without centrifugal force causing them to expand. Astronomers say they're spinning too fast to be explained by gravity.


I think Lerner and Alfven were right for two reasons. First, uncancelled charges (ionized by the stars) can be much stronger than gravity because electromagnetism has a much stronger energy density than gravity. Usual gravity like the earth's doesn't cancel out like its electric charges which are almost zero overall. If the earth's electric field was uncanceled it would have a huge electric charge dazzeling us with fizz. So the ionization of the stars of the Milky Way may make it so a force stronger than gravity would hold it together, and no doubt mass around us is in solid bodies because of electric fields binding the mass, not uncancelled out gravity which is far too weak.

The second reason I agree with Alfven is vis a vis plasma dynamics. Lerner uses the example of what happens when small amounts of plasma are ionized in the lab with strong electric fields, small whirpools are formed, that look and seem to be like a galaxy. This makes plasma physics a viable way to explain the cause the dynamics of cosmic masses, not just gravity.


About weather control, this lab plasma vortex may have use in non computerized simulation because it may also be the same generally as a typhoon. Both are powered by heat and whirl inward. They may not be exactly the same but they might be enough alike we could make it where we achieve reliable conclusions about the machines to control the plasma well as they would compare with building full-size machines to control the typhoon without cost of building these machines that might not work. For example a recent patent is for a hurricane control machine that is essentially a giant boat in the eye of the hurricane that would spray jets of cooling water from the ocean to cool down the hurricane. Since hurricanes are powered by heat this cooling is thought to be a way to stop the storms. I've tended to think a better use of this machine would be to spray the water on one side of the eye and this would throw the storm off center enabling us to steer the hurricane wherever we would want away from the shore, much cheaper and easier to move the storm away from where people live than to just cool the huge storm (hurricanes generate an atom bombs worth of energy per second. And even if they build the giant machine of the patent in addition to this huge energy the storm is also picking up more energy continually from the surrounding ocean. Hurricanes also have worth, e.g. they cool the tropics dramatically.).

To test this and other beliefs about hurricane control machines, the small plasma whirlpool mentioned above may be of worth. To make it more nearly like the hurricane, first the plasma vortex would be modified so the surface below the small whirlpool would offer friction so this would simulate the resistance to forward motion the ocean's surface would exert on the storm and the electric field above the plasma could be increased to simulate gravity, and the simulation could be edited by computer to make it act the most like a real storm by changing parameters like cohesion of the gas, centrifugal force, and so on. Once we have the plasma vortex acting like the hurricane by methods such as these, we could then test scaled-down weather control machines. For example, the ways of moving or cooling the tropical storms by way of a water jet machine I speak of above could be proven or disproven by a small beam in the plasma vortex, the beam might be of just the right energy to enable us to make reliable predictions about what would happen with a real jet and a real storm (Wampires wouldn't be of worth, they would always make twice the number of punctures, throwing off the computations!). Other possible ways to achieve typhoon control that have been devised like my own innovations of either TOSSING AN ICEBERG MOVED FROM THE POLAR REGIONS INTO THE STORM to both cool the storm and throw it in another direction where we may want it to go by the reaction to the large mass thrown into the storm as the ice would throw off the balance of the storm, or heating or cooling the ocean to form a heat path the storm could follow. This could be tried without having to build the big machines "till proven" with the plasma vortex or other physics weather simulation machine provided the small storm would act enough like the large storm that conclusions derived by this type of physics are of worth. And other ideas like the use of explosives or tarps on one side of the storm vortex (this also might throw the storm offcenter) or the super water absorbent gel named Dynomat they've tried to control hurricanes with, could be with more proof, especially if the plasma could be powered up a good bit in width to make it easier to test the worth of these inventions. It's a good memory of 2018 whirlpool reminds me of spindry!

If the plasma motif turns out to be unviable, another option may be to make an actual water whirlpool and modify it till it acts like a real storm, or ionize water or other heavy molecules in air till they have good cohesiveness and then making whirlpools out of this gas, perhaps 3 feet wide in a larger room and seeing where it would go complete with a reduced shoreline and deep and shallow "water" like at the beach. Or a finned mobile machine sort of like a washing machine on a good surface might make implosion of the air or water, or a good torus of the right type on the right type of surface might be used to simulate the general motion of the action reaction.

A possible way to test my idea of moving the jets stream for a while by laser or other heating bemas from the ground to improve control of storms or heat in summer could be by cohesive fluid streams of two types. Another way may be by a large band with small motors on the lower belt that power small wheels to make it so it moves like a real jet stream and then see if beams of the right power change the machine.

Tornado control machines like lasers or my idea of a helicopter UAV with fins or plates with helicopter rotors on both sides to interrupt the downward flow of the heavy air near the interface of the heavy/light air above may be tested by a room with air of heavy and light density (when I was a teen I ate my lunch boxes and lunch VISA!.). One weather control option is by ionizing beams above and below the storm into the clouds of the storm to move the ions at the top or bottom of the storm close or distant to hopefully influence rain. Click Here For More. To find out if this would be feasable rooms of high humidity and rain would be used where the ions are like real rain, and the beams and airflow could be applied to see if the rain may be changed well enough to be viable in a real rainstorm, about price/worth, and so on, and other considerations. The weather woman causes great weather in her helicopter fan!

GENERAL (EARTH) WEATHER CONTROL