A WAY TO PROVE IF THE EPR IS ABOUT GRAVITY
...
The Noncommmunication Theorem, a later development of Einstein's own EPR Paradox (by others) that says no commmunication is possible with the EPR at faster than light might be proven or disproven if its strength falls off by the usual laws of radiant energy with distance, this would be a sure sign it's sent by a signal of radiant energy, and isn't just the same event happening at distant places at once as some have believed. A radiant connection wouldn't be proof of faster than light itself, but it would be proof of a mechanical connection. The EPR may change gravity in a roundabout way, actually the ratio of centrifugal force to gravity. A higher speed FTL EPR signal with continuous changes in acceleration and wavelength like I think gravity would be might make gravity stronger. Even so though possibly still faster than light because lighter than light in my formulation, a lower EPR speed than gravity instead via a constant speed field like higher energy light we see around us would boost the predicted value of centrifugal force by way of disconnection caused by the slower and constant speed of light in special relativity (By the time the light reaches the moon a light second away, the moon has moved and is that much more disconnected causing the centrifugal force by way of the uniform motion of relativity and the centrifugal force). Even if the high speed EPR is slower than gravity the gravity would outdistance it to cause more implosion than expansion of the field. To prove this with real centrifugal force, since matter waves are easy to see with our physics machines with a bit of labor with the outward expansion of the ghost particles being the presumed cause of the centrifugal force, if we make the field higher or lower in energy and then spin the wheel we may see somewhat different amounts of centrifugal force. This would be via the ghost particle way to physics which many believe may allow better science like an improved vision of the space time of relativity via the low energy field instead of where Einstein's space time could be without as much worth, and the way to the ghost particle method used by cosmologists to save cosmic expansion via outward pressure of the field and other motifs of Inflation Expansion. The distinction between relativity would be here because of resiliency of the field and redshift of the field with the EPR's higher speed, for the same change in field density there may be a change in the centrifugal force other than just by the redshift of light of more common power and speed.

Both centrifugal force and gravity both are with energy conservation and no other force than gravity and centrifugal force are seen between the moon and earth or other masses, to change one is to change the other, so the speed and rate of change of the EPR would both be about gravity and electromagnetism. By energy conservation gravity would speed up while the low powered light would slow down, the actual speed of the EPR field from experiment would be about the rate of exchange. I believe if the EPR is eventually proven by the evidence to be (implosively) radiant and thus disproof of Noncommunication, and faster than light via Einstein's own belief when he pioneered the EPR, it's more about a lower energy more electromagnetic type wave of constant speed (though still perhaps much faster than light) like the unchanging speed of more common light seen in life at our own energy. Because it's the matter wave of subatomic physics, it has much higher density than gravity and isn't about the cause of gravity even if it may change it by way of changes in the ratio of centrifugal force to it. Because the EPR is the matter wave that makes up subatomic physics it may also be constant in speed like usual light, and this is stable in it's motifs, thus even if about gravity, the EPR may be of constant higher speed light like light seen around us. Otherwise both gravity and centrifugal force would be an acceleration and this would be disproof. More implosion and compaction of the field than expansion would be of worth or it would expand out indefinitely, this implosive entropy would be the foundation of subatomic stability. Unlike higher energy entropy the flow of the field by way of pressure would generally be more inward to cause gravity so while the speed of the EPR would perhaps be mostly constant and stable like optical light it would have inward entropy more like gravity, actually a blend of both thermodynamics and gravity to mediate the fields between masses like the earth and moon. The field that connects gravity with electromagnetism well would have properties of both. The constant speed wouldn't be absolutely maintained like with usual light and relativity because the force of implosion and expansion is not as strong as optical light that are the cause of quanta with lower density of the field, so could be a sort of low energy quanta without as much resistance of the field and via higher speed than light and may be by way of the phase change some believe in about gravity being like a superfluid. This idea of low energy quanta of the field might also make the interaction of the gravity and the EPR more well defined because it would mediate between the sharp distinction of the quanta like optical light and the more continuous force of gravity, if both quanta and nonquanta, physics might have a definite inbetween level to balance and conservation of energy and quantity of motion of both fields via the low energy quanta of the field.
..