I disagree with the belief in science called positivism, which holds that any motif that can't be measured is not science. This has been used in quantum mechanics, and here especially is where this idea is more worth if augumented with philosophy. Science knows how quantum physics works but not how. In quantum mechanics and other realms lots of motifs have been proven that are unlike usual events of the usual size in our living world. The reason I disagree with positivism as the only way of worth in quantum mechanics is because much has been "proven" in quantum mechanics often not found in usual experience at our level of life and power. This violates the science which says the laws of physics are the same through all realms of the cosmos. In the overall the only way to retain this is if we find the unifying link that makes it so science is smooth and flows well. The best way this may be achieved may be by explanations that link usual experience around us to subatomic physics or other science. To say that measure of the world is limited is no proof it always will be. Mathmaticians have invented motifs that were proven hundreds, or thousands of years later. The problem with all being just based on experience and not as much in explanation is that it excludes more of physics or science than may be needed to find the most proof. The future of much of science thus not be as much in a materialistic proof as some would say. Science was named natural philosophy at the outset, it's not just "large as life, and twice as real". It's slowed by limited beliefs, just as nations have had reduced wealth when oppressive governments were in power.
If we accept proof based on authority alone this is a sort of disavowel of the method they now have of trying to simulate physics with physical experiments like water going at faster than a fish in it to see if some types of radiation are emmited from black holes, the water is the gravitational field and the fish is the light. By using many of these experiments we may find out much more about physics in many realms, but positivism alone would exclude them if the motive of those who believe in it is to be too much based on the physical and not the more loose conclusion that it improves the bet that the more distant physics is about the experiment. I've use this type of as if physics experiment often, but it's not measurement other than by probabilities used to see what the more general physics are, it's how to improve guesses about where and what to measure well, but it's not the measure of it.
To link the subatomic realm to the more substantial sizes is a vast unexplored realm, mostly the endeavor to explain solids as well as fluids with quantum mechanics has been unviable so far because solids with combinations of many particles are more complex in general than fluids, so fluids are more easily explained.
-
The standard theory of subatomic physics is considered perfect by many with no loose ends. In the standard theory the belief they would have us accept is that if any of it was changed all the rest around us would also be unlike it is. But if this were so and all was made of the standard theory, much of usual life would just have its motifs alone so I think of the standard theory as incomplete, and the source of our unifying the two by good motifs would be yes, more explanation a good bit of the time and with more evidence. We know it must add up to more mundane physics, but we aren't real sure how. You may say well both the standard theory and life around us are proven, and the quantum physics just cancel out at our range and energy, it's not that they aren't there. But it must not all cancel out or no physics would be left over to make the commonplace physics of life and the mass of boxes and cones and surround around sound when we go visit the air-rena! If some of the flow of the field leaks out of the subatomic realm to make the usual physics as it must, is the subatomic realm real if most of it cancels? If both are real we might say the uniformity of science is more of worth to say the subatomic realm is good via one set of rules and our world another, connected ultimately by many combinations and the conservation of all the fields by motion. All energy and all there is made of motion and the reason the subtomic realm is so unusal or even "ancient egyptian" and the usual physics wouldn't be because either is more fundamental, just that the subatomic realm resonates with its physics the most optimally at it's energy and ours at it's own level. The way to connect the two and unify would be by seeing how the fields at ranges between the two flow and follow the paths they take, both in and out of the more quantum realm. Explanations and causes based on the evidence are like other life around us so they are most true overall in a general sense. If solutions are just an option for belief it's of more worth if more saws are in the box.
.
.
Computer Repairs, "Cheap, Rich Savings! A 20U College!
Here's just how you may read me more...My machine was a bit alseep when I would type in my wire to the web. The first solution was just the having the vending machine saved as if sort of cheap. I just read a Consumer Reports .org and they say the way out of Spyware and other problems is running Microsoft Antispyware or Spybot Search and Destroy (with names like these, they must be good, or some sort of cleaning woman!) I got "Avast" softwear (it wasn't a scourge, many Coast Guards of the world own lots of antispyware). One of the sites I read was a name like Spybot Search but both the Microsoft and the Spybot are cost proof, and savings rich these may be of more worth because others of other names tried to bill me. They saved a bit and it was rich when they realized my on off operation control box is Bizz Rate Gold.
.
.
