If you have two light waves travelling in opposite motion at the speed of light their speed is twice the speed of light relative to each other. If one beam starts out at the speed of light and another at the same time in opposite motion, if the starting out wave travels at any speed at all it's travelling at faster than the speed of light relative to the other as measured by the stationary observer between the two light waves and at a distance because the first wave is already at the speed of light. This may be disproof of relativity because with the faster than light motion, the signal between the two high speed observers is cut due to the faster than light motion, and Einstein said no information carrying signal can go faster than light, and this seems to be like saying with the signal cut by faster than light motion, no faster than light motion is seen! Einstein also said no matter having mass can travel faster than light, this is like two planes made of matter travelling faster than sound, the communication by sound is out of reach, but they are actually at faster than sound even though it's not apparent by way of sound till after the trip. While Einstein might say that no signal is sent between the beams, so the motion isn't faster than light, when they both reach the center if any information is found to be exchanged between the waves, this is proof Einstein was wrong except in a limited sense about the speed of light. Each wave is just travelling at the speed of light itself, but the information encoded in each ray from the origins of each, is connected at half the distance, and in half the time. This is proof the information is faster than light. Neither ray is faster than light itself relative to a stationary observer, both travel at just the speed of light, but in opposite directions.
The light waves are information carrying signals. If you measured the two waves and the distance they travel, the measured space time is evidence the speed is faster than light.
(It's been found more safe when you go in an airliner than if you receive a blood pressure cuff for 300 at the ER at 250 mph. It's where it's not AHH! and they howl, it's where they say, AHH! what a relief, who could afford to be ill!)
Another way of looking at this about the ships is if you had two airships in the air, and they were out of ways to go faster than sound (perhaps in the months before the faster than sound dude, when he was named What's his Name!) If two planes at say 3/4 the speed of sound were moving in the opposite path and they were connected by the sound at lower speeds, beyond half the speed of sound of each airplane, the sound would lose connection.
Even with motion seen from the ground of both planes at faster than the speed of sound, the signal between the F1 and 1/2's by way of sound wouldn't go, they would obviously be seen from the land to be moving faster than sound. Likewise if you have two high speed starships both at 3/4 the speed of light, the light would be connected up at low speeds. But beyond the point where the starships move faster than light like the planes there would be no connection of the light like no connection of the sound in the air would. This is a prediction of my theory of the faster than light motion of General Wave Dynamics (GWD). Particles in the "atom smashers" would be able to go at more than half the speed of light each in opposite motion, (e.g. 3/4 the speed of light each). The starships or other motes won't gain the infinite mass of relativity because relative to each high speed starship, if not faster than light in their own frame, the speed of light is the same of each observer as they measure the light flowing in through the realm around their ship.
To the stationary observer (in Ohio no doubt!) the planes would be going faster than sound in opposite motion. And for higher speed with light likewise each high speed ship measures their own speed to be no faster than the speed of light relative to the cosmos except when the other ship is reached. This is the same with the airplanes, even if they couldn't go faster than sound relative to the air.
The Starship's Enterprise would win mass in special relativity by friction with the field when moving at higher and higher velocities. This is how the observer is important in relativity. The field around the observer changes how the field of the rest of the cosmos looks to them by way of the induction. (Note that some sort of information has to be sent out at faster than light to actually shape the redshift of the light before it reaches the starship. If it were just at the speed of light it couldn't reach fast enough to change it. I identify this component of the field with the low energy matter waves of subatomic physics, strong enough to shape the field but faster than light to reach it because of the low energy. Like gravity these waves cannot be shielded in the lab.)
Airplanes have the sound waves around them and this would be about friction, the same as the extra weight of relativity, but since the sound is out of the realm of the other ship there is no friction between them and so the weight put on from the field is just that of the airships ununified when if in disconnected motion as in the above. And in relativity, even if faster than light in relative motion from the vantage point of the observer at rest, both starships would just weigh more by the mass of the field around them by the usual math of Special Relativity but not the augumentation that would be caused by the overall motion of the starships. They are disconnected so there's no mass gain associated with this component of the higher speed motion.
With the "slow speed of light" between here and alpha centauri it's impossible to know what event is before or after in Einstein's theory, so there is a loose connection. Disconnection of points of space time allow other masses of the starships than via Special Relativity.
The assumption of a resilient medium thus explains
why the two opposite starships won't gain infinite mass even if faster than light, and the observations of astronomers, e.g why galaxies are seemn moving away from us on both sides at Faster Than Light with the expansion of the cosmos, as well as other evidence. Click Here for my high velocity supersound Faster Than Light synopses!
A genuine relativist may say,"If you think of relativity as sort of as if seeing the space and time as if at an angle, by contraction of the field with the Fitzgerald Contraction, this makes the high speed motions all fit in the frame of light and so none of the motion of the starships is with any observation seen to be faster than light. You can't add your velocity to the other velocities." This is true, but this is for stationary observers. And light itself is the great absolute of relativity, it can't be transformed away by change of wavelength of opposite light rays. Any light travelling in any direction must somewhere else have another wave of light travelling toward it, so all light or heavier Faster Than Light particles or other high speed observers anywhere would have to have infinite redshift, and all the light we see has just usual redshift.
Einstein believed there was no medium, just empty space and time. If so the space and time between the starships would be empty. Empty space and time would have no disconnection of the field at faster than light and the high speed ships would be infinite, and this is thus a disproof of Einstein's theory and a proof of my more general explanation of GWD, General Wave Dynamics. Einstein didn't just define high speed signals carrying information at no faster than light, no mass is allowed to either. Mass at the most basic level is made of information, this is a basic truth about physics. Like a relay runner with a memo who reaches a distant olympia at high speed, if faster than sound and the memo was a sound clip, if the memo is read following the race, even while there was no way to know what the runner was up to enroute by sound, when he reaches the olympic goal there is proof he was faster than sound and the memo "of mass" is the information he reached with. Matter is stored information without as much reach as energy, like parallel processing in computers, disconnected memos can be connected and compared, if there was higher speed motion like the airliners even if disconnected during the relay, this is information travelling faster than light. So I don't think just half of Einstein's definition of no information or mass both can be used to disprove the possibility of faster than light. All matter and energy are unified by energy conservation, the uniformity of physics, and other laws like gravity, so the distant galaxies are massive and are faster than light. When they would move up to exactly the speed of light in opposite directions relative to each other there would perhaps be something like a shift of phase and a sonic boom except of light with the snap back of the field lines, and then the finite field lines would become more local to the field around each high speed mass. The standard explanation about more space between them being created by the expansion of the cosmos would be disproof of relativity because no matter how much room you have of any field around us two points in the field are always connected by a given speed of the points; more space just means the starships would be going faster than light in relative motion but no explanation has been offered for this by cosmologists, so some other way to go Faster Than Light than by this explanation would still be needed to explain the observed speed of some masses in cosmology. If the galaxies are seen to go Faster than Light and they don't have infinite mass, this may mean something more like with the phase shift of sound may actually take place.
Why No Infinite Faster Than Light Mass Augumentation?
Most people believe that Relativity says that no signals can go Faster Than Light. Actually Einstein believed a signal Faster Than light wasn't impossible, the only limit of the physics was that waves of the type that were already faster than light alone could achieve this. If the field lines are disconnected at faster than light like the sound around opposite airships or subatomic events, the field lines wouldn't be able to gain the infinite mass they would attain with stretching nearer and nearer to the speed of light. The galaxies might move away from us at Faster Than Light because at the great distances the light won't connect. By the laws of radiant energy, the field is also of such low energy the connection is much weaker and so this may make it so it can't multiply up beyond a certain point. The main thing unlike with air and sound is that the speed of light around the area of a high speed observer is still not passed because of Relativity even if with more distance the field connection is unconnected. With no connection at greater distances or lower energies in general for the whole bubble of field around this observer there would be no resistance to higher speed motion because without the general long distance connection, the field couldn't build up more and more mass of a high speed observer moving through it via resistance. In it's rest frame it's still at rest. If a high speed airship has faster than sound motion, and then would lose connection even if they gain a lot of heat from the field, it would seem reasonable to believe that high speed starships might do the same by the same general motif. While the field has heat, the heat is finite. It may have just so much mass, then let go with a snap just like the air of the opposite airships with a sonic boom. Either this effect may be found, or perhaps only the Faster Than Light motion that's disconnected from the start so the mass won't build up so much there would be too much resistance to moving at higher speed to go Faster Than Light. With two photons moving toward a middle point there can be no (electromagnetic or light wave) connection between them before they meet so there is no general resistance to their motion and they would have no infinite mass augumentation with Faster Than Light. Two photons or other more massive particles moving away from each other would be moving at slower than light as most do, and with more and more motion, since the connection wasn't cut at the outset would have all the effects of Einstein's belief. Even here it may be possible to augument the distance and reduce the mass so much that these higher energy motifs are bypassed. Like two antennas of much different wavelength that don't resonate, I believe that gravity being much lighter than light may go faster than light, or the fractional charges of subatomic physics may spin around go say 3 times the speed of light with 1/3 the charge, the lighter you go the faster you move. If faster and slower than sound are allowed for the same airplane it seems possible the same could apply to high speed masses in cosmology, otherwise the Faster Than Light motion of the cosmic whirlwinds whizzing away is without causology via Einstein.
Physics Synopses; More About GWD and Other Observations.
.
Copyright 2008 by Charles Frederick Lawson.
-
