Thursday, July 10, 2025

Simulation Of Green Spaces and Finding Underlying Value of Oxygen, Shade, Pollution Reduction, and More..

 It's been well established that access to plants and pets is good for general health.


I think there may be several ways this is possible. One is that even a lawn or other area like this stays about 30 degrees cooler in the heat and the small animals flourish there. 

















 Trees may help in other ways, with shade in the heat and by moisture, protection from the rain as well as in the winter evergreen trees even protect from the snow. Perhaps most important, green spaces give more oxygen..


 Since the grass doesn't give much shade or protection from the snow, one thing we might predict is how the health benefits of living near trees are greater than than for those who just live near lawns. 


And while in the winter it's cold even without the trees, and while it might be colder near the trees because they're evergreen and they give shade, in general there might be a slight effect of the tree to improve the health of a person in winter because they also give oxygen and they even protect from the snow at least if beneath them. 


 Since I walk a lot and I want to stay fit there is a line of trees up a hill near where I hill where they planted them, And so on the summer I walk in that line of the edge the shade all the way up and down two or three times for a cardio boost, sort of recycling the shade and this is a more comfortable in the heat and this is what I think may have been going on when we were living in the tropics.. Perhaps the rainforest wasn't so miserable because it's constantly raining, and when you're moist you feel five times cooler than when you're dry and because we were constantly in and out of the shade.


 Another aspect of green spaces may be about how as we looked around in evolution all the time we were seeing all kinds of plants around us except if we lived in the desert. 


 If, as has been noted, heredity is stored environment, the sight of plants themselves might have a strong influence on how we think and feel. Another influence may be by the wildlife that may live in the green space which gives another element of reality to the viewer.


 Therefore those who mostly live near concrete may show the smallest positive influence of green spaces like lawns, because they neither see the plants or animals as much, nor do they get the oxygen or the cooling in the heat. 


Those who live near lawns but no trees are getting some visual energy, perhaps even by the wavelength of the greenness of the herbs to their vision, oxygen, cooling, moisture, and the possible influence of some types of wildlife hey it's Saturday night! throw a party! 

 The sounds of wildlife may also have influence on health because if there is no sound in the room where you live it's been found that your brain doesn't have a loop of reaction back and forth to constantly refine the brain and sensation by these small sounds.

 The sounds of animals may be more valuable than just sounds around the house to our health (What's that RV doing in the living room!) in this respect because they create more dynamic tension and may exercise your brain more.


 Those who live near green spaces with both lawns and trees may have more of these influences, and if some of the plants are evergreen they may even get another advantage in the winter by shielding from the snow. 

 Even so people who have evergreen trees giving more shade to their house in the winter might not have it as good as people with deciduous trees shading their house in the summer even while deciduous trees  wouldn't add shade in the winter to cause lower temperatures which you wouldn't want. 


 On the other hand Evergreen trees would give oxygen year round unlike deciduous trees.


It's been found the plants grow faster when they give sound like classical music or mostly any vibration. So it might make us also do well if we have these same vibrations.. Even the sound of the wind through the trees may be good for our health and when we emerge out into the sunshine the sight of the clouds and the blue sky may be a boost to our health also as well as just as in evolution we can meet people there we see more often..


These are some of the reasons, not just the green spaces being outdoors is good for health.

It would seem that plants also filter out pollution so small oxygen filters that would go in the nose powered by nuclear batteries like the chinese have invented that would last 100 years and with a special oxygen compound that stores a large amount of oxygen may be of use.   

 This might also be a good way to defend against pollution for living in the city much more cheaply than a gas mask to wear is just for the rich! Just small fans in your nose that make you feel a lot better without pollution and to reduce covid or bird flu events. 

 This could be useful for doctors as they treat health issues and also about antibiotic resistance which may become worse than covid according to some science sites. This might be useful for farmers and for the cows themselves to wear these filters and for people who live near the beach which is 75% of the people ..3/4 of the bacteria in the air at the shore are bad bacteria caused by people. Evolution may never have been like this And now you can see why the real estate value of property with a view of the water is up 100%, well, somewhat!


 All these aspects, oxygen, moisture, shade from the heat, reduction of pollution, the visual aspect of both the plants and the animals, natural sounds of animals to energize the brain that often are around green spaces, all these are measurable by experiment to find out which ones are the most valuable. We might imagine the visual aspects could all be simulated by virtual reality for the benefits of green spaces without living near them like for those who can't afford access, and oxygen might be used with this VR simulation, as well as the sounds of wildlife. The main part of the simulation about staying cool in the heat might be allowed by air conditioning, alternating with lots of heat to simulate going out into the sunshine as well as with sun lamps since it's become apparent that all the wonders of vitamin D actually have turned out to be caused by sunshine on skin..


 Other science has shown how alternating between hot and cool is good for your immune system.. of course because most people lived by the ocean In evolution as they do now before the invention of fire  "When will they invent fire?" I was attributing this health value of alternating hot and cold to how we would just go in and out of the water but I also realized that in the tropics we were also going in and out of the shade of the plants.. 

 This is why for an indoor simulation of a green space as I say we might want to alternate heaters with air conditioners for the most healthy event, or any rate to prove this. If some of these influences are more powerful than others it might be a lot easier to get the result than with the 100% VR simulation. And It seems possible some of these isolated influences could be multiplied up more than natural or with alternation etc. for an even more valuable boost to health.


 


 




Friday, July 04, 2025

 40 Years Earned of 1/3 Asleep Saved !


A Hungarian man once spent 40 years of his life without even once going to sleep until the time he died.


Here's a Reel from Instagram for you about this..


Paul Kern was in battle in WWI when a bullet wounded the frontal lobe of his brain.

Until his death in 1955, he didn't sleep from then on.

His curious condition made him the subject of several intense tests by brain and nerve specialists throughout Europe, but none could ever trace just why his body no longer needed sleep.




"From the moment Mr. Kern opened his eyes in Luxemberg, he did not sleep, nor did he express the slightest desire to do so."

Apart from the occasional headache, Kern's brain mysteriously did not require sleep as an essential form of rest, seeing as his work as a government administrator, which he continued doing after the incident, was never affected.


More than the lack of sleep, he reported that the many hours he spent awake in bed trying to lure sleep in exhausted him more than staying awake.


Later, Kern began a routine of laying down and closing his eyes for 2 hours every day.

While he was completely alert and responsive during this time, experts think his brain was able to rest for him to function seamlessly for the remainder of his active hours

.

My Comments..This might seem to be useful like for improving efficiency..If everyone didn't sleep we could do more work if this type of insomnia caused no harm and it could also be used for the military..





My question would be about Fatal Familial Insomnia FFI a form of insomnia also that goes on without sleep,


 Like it says on The Jug of Vivarin May Cause Drowsiness but Don't Count on It!.. 

 According to this Wikipedia link FFI is  fatal to most people who have it in about three months.. this is caused by prions like in Alzheimer's and this is why FFI is usually fatal, while as in the headline the other type of insomnia doesn't seem to even have adverse events.

I surely don't find insomnia more relaxing ..sleep is, and being awake is often so active!


Almost all types of animals sleep including even fish and birds and it seems so essential even to life, it makes me wonder if this example of insomnia is actually a hoax..

Since damage to the frontal lobe of the brain is common like with accidents or brain damage it would seem in the history of these events this would have repeated if it wasn't a hoax. 

  This might be provable with changes in the brain like deep ultrasound perhaps to change the brains of mice or the frontal lobes of other animals with larger brains. 

Research has found that you need to forget what you do quite well all night because while most people think 50,000 to 70,000 thoughts a day they forget most of the p.m. memories with amnesia. 

 Other science shows that you need to create new memories at the base of your brain to not become upset or edgy. I'd always read that while short-term memory in the brain is limited, we have unlimited long-term memory storage ability.. but if we're basically condensing the information while we sleep by forgetting unimportant memories it would seem there might also be a limit for this condensed information because there might be no extra room for it beyond a certain point.


On the other hand the brain is hugely complex with ten thousand different types of neurons so this might involve change to another area of the brain than FL.

Some scientists believe that as we get older our neural connections get more and more complex so it takes more and more energy to access them and that slows us down with age. A cat essentially has the same neurons we have, we just have more of them so if this idea is true We expect that cats might not slow down as much in cat years because they have fewer connections they're making with time.




Tuesday, June 24, 2025

Ways to Defend Against the Possibility of Megatsunamis (E and W.) And Earthquakes

 

  Recent findings "about old events!" have shown that the W. coast of the United States may be overdue for a giant 100 to 1000 foot high mega tsunami. Earthquakes, landslides, and volcanic eruptions have been relatively common in even recent history..these behemoths have struck 19 times over the last 10,000 years. Click here for the IFL Science Post or see the same link at the end of the page if you like.

  It's believed this may cause loss of many cities including much of Hawaii and coastal Alaska, and cause disruption of the world economy.



 On some of my other posts I've talked about finding ways to reduce or stop the impact of earthquakes including some  plans for urban areas like circular arrays of pendulums with plates above that move in the opposite direction as they oscillate around the balancing point between the weight and the plate above and this generates counteracting waves for input of the wave, reducing the damage to the city from the outside with a spherical set of lines of these arrays under the city. (This might also help defend buildings in earthquakes by automatically counteracting the shock wave by related methods. Large pendulums under buildings would allow the building if allowed to move under inertia to not move much as others have considered but using this type of counteracting force might also be more useful since it could be used anywhere in a building.)

Another type of zone under a city might have radial tunnels and with elastic lines at other angles under tension to much damp the shock wave from the quake.


 A more ambitious method I thought of reducing earthquakes might be to use nuclear or fusion power to power large gyroscopes that would store enough force to generate magnetic fields that could be focused down to the more magnetic mantle and melt more of the interface between the magma and the solid rock causing the flow of the magma current (as E to W) below them not to exert as much force by reduced friction on the crust and reducing the force of the plates moving against each other.

A related method (perhaps the best) for the West Coast mega tsunami hazard would be to dig wells along the fault line where the American Plate moving W is colliding with the Juan De Fuca plate from the west and make them out of something like super hardened ceramic concrete to withstand the heat of the magma and release it from that flow of the magma to the east that's moving the plates together.

 The flow of current goes upward where the plates meet and then to the E and W, but more to move the Juan Dr Fuca plate E. 

  This would be in a way of sort of volcano that would build up mountains of solid lava on the base of the ocean at the spreading center from the outflow that may otherwise cause the earthquake and tsunami. We might even have more Hawaii's by way of this..

 Without the currents moving the plates along underneath, the pressure doesn't build up and so there's no huge earthquake and the tsunami risk might also be reduced.

 

Scientists have also found there's a risk of an earthquake off the east coast by another cause.. an underwater landslide  "may cause a wave" And this could inundate the E. Coast including Washington.. for the solution to this I thought of another method and that would be a sort of net around and inside the underwater sand that may suddenly eventually collapse otherwise and cause the tsunami. The network along with the buoyancy of the sand under the water would at least slow down the submarine landslide if it ever started or perhaps even gradually lower it down. This may also be a good way to reduce the risk of avalanches.


 Originally I had thought of using a wall with explosives on the shore that generates a counter tsunami and stops it from causing damage.

  However I learned about the physics that the two waves would just go right through each other and you have two tsunamis. 

 

 With more consideration I realized that it might be possible to use drones from an airplane while the tsunami wave is still at sea. This wave is only about a foot high but it's traveling at hundreds of miles per hour much faster than other waves and often boats don't even notice them as they go through the ocean unless they know what they're looking at. Once a tsunami reaches the shore it's at an angle to the wave and it builds up to large height.

 On the other hand if the drones are sent out to right over where the wave is about to disperse since there are two forces on all moving waves, one tending to speed it up and the other tending to slow it down, if the drone hits the one foot wave with an explosion of the right type this allows the force trying to slow it down more influence and relatively soon with more explosions the tsunami is stopped.



 One of my first ideas about preventing earthquakes where the plates are built up was to have slow release of the force by smaller earthquakes by some method like injecting gas or fluid into the fault lines or or by  small well placed detonations that might not cause as much hazard.. and at first I even thought that immobilizing the plates on both sides of the fault with a strong enough bonding method might resolve the issue..these were my earlier ideas but they have some value for like fault lines where the pressure already had built up and can't be released as above by methods like the wells.

Here's the IFL megatsunami site link.

Thanks for reading..

Monday, June 09, 2025

 Dark Matter ; A Possible Solution By Way of "More Classical Electrodynamics"


While it's true that dark matter has been found to bend light as in galaxies or with high energy explosions like the pistol nebula which is the most high energy event in yet known by astronomers, for the pistol nebula, the dark matter goes through normal matter without any  influence other than the bending of light seen.


 It's been said that dark matter has no influence of any kind seen on any kind of matter other than light but this is not completely true because it's related to the extra mass of galaxies that's causing them all to spin faster than they should causing them to otherwise explode by centrifugal force and here too we see the bending of light.


Even so we can't find dark matter around us with mechanical, chemical, spectroscopic or other changes of this type.





  I've had the idea that dark matter and dark energy are closely related to gravity and centrifugal force.


For the pistol nebula we might say that since gravity and centrifugal force are found to not shield including gravity for eclipses or centrifugal force for metal plates, this might seem to be a first approximation for a solution to why dark matter doesn't cause these kind of common events we see around us in physics, even while the mass of galaxies causes bending of light and also even without the dark matter there to cause other changes with the pistol nebula, the light is bent in ways that show the dark matter is there.


Dwarf galaxies weigh a thousand times more than the light we see from the stars that would presumably be seen by the influence all this mass to cause fusion of the stars.


 My possible explanation for why these galaxies bend light by their gravity yet with not as much evidence of fusion is about how perhaps over great enough distance, the distance between the field lines would be enough for the waves between them to increase in speed and change energy for inertia or gravity.


Here's a page about dwarf galaxies that says that the galaxies with less dense stars actually have more bending of light than galaxies with more closely packed stars which fits in with my idea that the external field is nonlinear. The site link says that they can explain the evolution of dwarf galaxies where they go from compact to diffuse later in the evolution by way of non gravitational radiation of some type (perhaps radiation pressure from the stars I might guess) but they don't seem to have a cause of the larger scale clumping once the dwarf galaxies are more diffuse.. see the same link at the end of my post if you like.


  Maxwell believed that the low energy medium can't be made of particles because if we weigh it it will be like a gas and it would have weight..


 Here again the dark matter has a lack of chemical or mechanical properties and so on.  This might be because the waves are more pure and superfluid and they wrap around the outside of each heavy quanta but don't much influence the forces at shorter range.


The classical electromagnetic field lines  may need dark matter and dark energy waves between them to make them not bunch up or kink or break. 

I think of this dark matter as "cold" because as by Maxwell's idea it's not particulate or a gas which would radiate out like heat but instead the waves between the field lines would be more pure and with lower entropy causing the attraction having been derived from gravity and also holding the electromagnetic field lines together for the inertial dark matter.


 The lack of shielding for gravity and centrifugal force I had tended to believe was caused by what I call Line Removal, LR.


By this both gravity and centrifugal force would wrap around the outside of the heavy quanta like a sort of invisibility cloak and at the same time they measure the acceleration of gravity or the force of inertia by finding the difference between the spin on one limb and the other limb of the quanta for the net acceleration of gravity etc.


We might account for the lack of the chemical or mechanical events seen for dark matter by this method. The acceleration is there but by line removal there's no more. This might be why Einstein believed that gravity is completely simple and it acts always the same for all masses.


 Even so, for the dwarf galaxies for example the realm of the dark matter and dark energy waves between the field lines might be considerably nonlinear and the same for inside the heavy quanta around us.. because in experiments a quantum goes in and five different quanta reradiate out and you can't predict which one will except by statistics..or for example when you have a bunch of heavy quanta and wait till they become radioactive, the half-life of that batch of quanta is found, yet you can't actually know when which one will radiate out first or when.

 As I say the zigzagging of the waves back and forth between the classical electromagnetic field lines would maintain their coherence and yet be nonlinear.


 So my possible explanation for why with events like the pistol nebula we can see the bending of the light and yet when the dark matter moves through the other matter we see no change whatsoever of the "other more mechanical" events, may be about nonlinear changes in the field lines.


 Note that by relativity mass and energy are equivalent and so there is no extra mass added on external to the quanta. All the mass there is is in the quanta and gravity is simple by relativity. This seems to be contradicted by the evidence that when you take a bunch of masses and you move them together it changes their gravity..if gravity is simple it shouldn't change.


With this the wave events between the quantum field lines essentially take on a life of their own after they're emitted by the plus or minus electric charges (this output by the waves between by more than input of the quanta is also common with QCD and the gluons). This is not found with the positive and negative charges that cause the snapback of the light by more usual events. By partially violating energy conservation this would also explain why the galaxies are spinning faster than by relativity. 


 So the lines radiate out over greater distance, the snapback increases, and this causes a greater bending of the light..


 But the plus and minus charges themselves aren't receiving information as much from that one-way flow from the charges to the light.



 By being nonlinear the external fields unlike the quanta  themselves are non-commutative or less so. For the pistol nebula this may be energy from the electromagnetic field and it's much higher energy than the gravity..


 Unlike the pistol nebula, the bending of the light for a galaxy is being caused by the gravity of the galaxy. And as I say since gravity is at a much different energy than inertia, the mass density corresponding to the bending of the light may be different for high energy collisions seen and the amount of mass implied with galaxies.


 So if inertia and gravity aren't completely equivalent we might expect to find two different levels of bending of the light (two different types of dark matter events) depending on whether we see it by way of the gravity or the higher energy electromagnetic field more about inertia for the given assumed amount of dark matter. For the predicted amount of dark energy for a galaxy we might find a different amount of bending of the light than for the mass by the bending of the light of a high energy event like those seen without much gravity.


  Unlike what Einstein believed, gravity has a source since Einstein like Mach thought inertia and gravity were much the same (otherwise a pendulum wouldn't stop towards the center of the earth after it slows down) and so as you get nearer and farther from the source of the dark matter caused by gravity you have more change in it than you will have by the inertial version of dark matter if this idea turns out to be viable.

 ( Inertial forces unlike gravity don't have a source and so any body with inertia by it's measure moves forward in its own path and its local vicinity like particles of a gas and so overall inertial forces like centrifugal force tend to radiate out while the attractive forces like gravity trying to move inward and have a source.)


Suppose we have a boson like light and a fermion like the + and - charges. Now suppose the dark matter force is bending the light and the heavier quantum.


 The light will bend and not the particles with rest mass because they're spinning faster than the speed of light inside for the extra mass like the proton where we can't find 97 percent of the mass, this would be the dark matter, and it also isn't interacting much with the strong force. 

 As Tesla believed about gravity the Earth may be absorbing a large amount of energy all the time, yet we don't see this energy because most of it wraps around the outside of the heavy quanta and it's invisible mostly to gravity except in a roundabout way.


  The gravity waves would stream both in and out of the Earth with only a few interacting with the quanta of the Earth.

 

 The light has zero rest mass and so it spins inside only at the speed of light so here the energy conversion by the outside force on the light is 100%.. Fermions being heavier perhaps spin faster than the speed of light inside and have Line Removal and so they have more gyroscopic stability unlike the light which gives way more completely to the force acting on it externally. 


The dark matter is wrapping around the heavy quanta for the high energy events seen yet not having much influence on them just as when you move around the room you feel the force when you change speed but dark matter otherwise has been tough to find.


We say the positive and negative charges are sending out these waves that then reach the light to bend it more. 


(By Maxwell's method he used to predict the speed of light exactly, otherwise totally having nothing to do with it by way of Special Relativity, I would call this an astounding coincidence otherwise without cause by relativity.. waves like the matter waves in quantum mechanics can be faster than light because they're not being influenced as much by the quanta of relativity, and the waves going between the field lines would be a sort of invisible oil permeating all the fields operating between the field lines as a superfluid faster than light, but not gaining relativistic mass by way of the phase change and Line Removal to make the clockwork mechanical cosmos of the quanta continue in motion.. otherwise the Higgs particles would rapidly cause all the particles to stop spinning and linear motion to stop). For the positive and negative charges not to influence other positive and negative charges directly this would seem to imply that just that electron and positive charge are entangled with the light and no other.

 The Line Removal of the heavier quanta will prevent them from fusing together to be entangled but the light is more naturally entangled with the plus and minus charges and this might be why the Dark Matter influences the light but not the quanta so much.

 

  By this since it's much more common and easier to entangle the light with the electron and the positive charge than this because of Line Removal, the quanta with mass bend the light but the light doesn't have as much influence on them. The quanta influence the light by a nonlinear event but they're entangled only with that light and no other and not with other heavy quanta. This and Line Removal might be why Dark Matter bends light and yet it shows less influence on the baryons or mesons.


 Dark Matter wouldn't make the cosmos slow down by more attraction by acceleration like bending light more; rather this would only be caused by the electrostatic repulsion of the huge magnetic fields seen on the cosmic scale. For more about my ideas about cosmology see the link at the end of this post..


Summary;


In my belief gravitational and inertial mass are not completely equivalent.


 But radiating out more the classical field lines might allow the waves between them to move at higher speed and this connects to the light by the plus and minus charges to cause more bending of the light.


 The dark matter is actually between the field lines and wraps around the heavy quanta by what I call Line Removal LR, and this is why it has no mechanical events other than gravity or the bending of light.

The galaxies are spinning too fast and this will be because the dark matter is accelerating them and here the lines radiate out so much that the dark matter might cause the light to bend more.


 Because of gravitational and inertial mass not being completely equivalent, the bending of light for the galaxies will be a different amount and with different angles from the source than for other high energy events seen by astronomers with less mass present.

 If so massive dark energy is not equivalent to inertial dark energy.

Because the radiation out between the field lines is more distant from the electrons and positive charges for the inertial dark matter, and because the charges are only connected to that particular light by entanglement, the dark matter might influence the light but not the other quanta..

 Dwarf galaxies may have hugely more mass when they are more diffused compared to when they're compact because when the lines radiate out with more distance between them the force gets stronger perhaps thousands of times than the implied mass by the bending of light.

The quanta that send out the waves are only the source of them and the waves are non-commutative like the gluons in QCD so there's extra mass in this extra motion of the waves between the field lines and here would be where the dark matter is..


 I know all this may sound a bit hypothetical. I consider myself to be a traditionalist like Einstein thought of himself and while all this may seem to not be as traditional as the rest of a lot of my pages about physics, I think it's possible..

While this is not my most important idea in physics it makes predictions and offers cause for the bending of light the spin of quanta and how gravity and inertia are transparent to mass.


Here is a possible explanation for what we find in cosmology if the cosmos is expanding where we are like the jets of a galaxy except on a huge scale.. by way of energy conservation the universe wasn't created out of nothing in this view instead it's been cycling internally with the magnetic fields going out of the jets and back around the disc and repeating.. 

..one value of this is that the center of the cosmos is there with stable gravity and this allows the formation of structures like the Great Wall since the local expansion of the cosmos at our jet began, because even with inflation cosmology gravity might be much faster yet causing the galaxies to form sooner also with more force being communicated between the center of the cosmos by the faster than light connection by gravity, otherwise the galaxies wouldn't have formed this soon as seen from sensors like the Webb Telescope perhaps 200 million years from what otherwise would have been thought to be the moment of creation and this creation would otherwise violate energy conservation, one of the most well founded ideas in the history of science.. also note that inflation expansion cosmology necessitates the violation of relativity by faster than light radiance outward at the outset.


.Click Here for more about this, "Cosmic Jet Cosmology."

Here again is the link to the Scitech Daily site about how dwarf galaxies with less dense stars actually bend light more than other galaxies. This was something I didn't know about while I was devising this method until I looked it up for my research and found this also Click Here..

For a general page I consider to be the most complete of the 40 years I've been researching about this click here..The advent of an old science is always more wise than the health of wisdom!

 


 

Friday, May 16, 2025

Frozen Dark Matter From Early Light Speed Quanta in the Cosmos?

 https://www.sciencealert.com/new-theory-suggests-dark-matter-is-frozen-relics-of-light-speed-particles


On this link they discuss about a possible origin of dark matter that is "Light Speed particles in the early Cosmos with enough compression presumably to convert the energy to mass which are Cooper pairs."


 I'll tend to believe this when we see it because if the Dark Matter around us is actually Cooper pairs or mass why wouldn't light just bounce off of that mass and wouldn't it easily have been found already? 

 A sofa is made of mass and when you move off the cushion, you're lightened up! Mass is dense and light will often bounce off of it.


The article doesn't mention what the other signs of this type of Dark Matter would be. And if there are valuable ways of knowing this and a way of making it dark this could not be ruled out.





 A lot of us have ideas about what dark matter might be, and I'm no exception!


Here's a Link to my recent post about another possible way to solve about Dark Matter.