Gravity And Causality Why It's Both Implosive and May Reradiate as Einstein Believed

I believe General Relativity is proof of Einstein not of the relativity of gravity. All the experimental proofs of General Relativity, Mossbauer, frame dragging, ect., are proofs of change in acceleration, where the speed of light changes and Special Relativity is the only time when all observers are equal with a constant speed of light. While Einstein tried to solve this by his Equivalence Principle where he says all accelerated frames of reference are equal like in his inertial and gravitational elevator thought experiment, he considers only the accelerated frames of reference here not all observers, which is the foundation of the entire causology of relativity. If all observers are equal, why are just some observers valid in general relativity?


As you may know two physicists won the Nobel Prize around 2000 for the "proof" of General Relativity where Einstein predicted the rate of gravitational radiation from massive systems like the binary stars. The measurement in higher resolution has been believed to be evidence the assumption that gravity as Einstein believed is radiant at the right rate. But here too the acceleration is not proof of the relativity of gravity, if my causology of GWD is true, this is more disproof of General Relativity! Einstein believed that gravity moves at the speed of light, a seemingly straightforward conclusion since by E=mc2 the less mass you have like the lighter force of gravity the higher the speed, like light which has 0 rest mass so it moves at the speed of light. Gravity being lighter yet would go at its top speed too, which by relativity is just the speed of light.

.
One problem with the predicted rate of gravitational rate of radiation of the binary star system is that it is radiation, and gravity is an implosion. But we must assume that if the gravity is imploding at the speed of light, no outward radiance can take place because as I say about opposite light rays or high speed ships, if the light is moving at the speed of light, any motion in the opposite direction by any other body or light ray is faster than light. This seems to be like not just two opposite starships that absolutely lose connection beyond a certain speed like the opposite speeding galaxies astronomers see on each side, that's explained by the expansion of the space or field between them so there's no causal connection to violate faster than light motion by relativity some say, instead this seems like two opposite speeding airplanes that lose connection at faster than sound, and when they meet they find their speed didn't just disappear to 0 when they were absolutely disconnected as relativity would hold, rather they were connected by the low energy field like the electromagnetic field the air is mostly made of so when they meet they don't just materialize to violate energy conservation, the airships exist through the time of motion. .CLICK HERE FOR MORE ABOUT THIS.

If the implosion of the gravitational radiation is indeed at just the speed of light, any radiation outward at all is disproof of no faster than light motion being possible.

Implosion alone seems to violate causality. If you have a wave in a pond it only radiates outward from a source like a rock. With implosion and no reradiance, we would have the wave starting around the rocks and sand of the shore and then imploding in and causing the event that would be at the center of the mass. I've believed that gravity is time reversed in general from electromagnetism, gravity implodes us downward to a point, and electromagnetism lifts us up with expansion to more entropy. If thermodynamic entropy flows outward from hot to cold, it seems that gravity to attract flows inward from cold to hot.
As I believe also, there may be low energy reradiation of the gravity so the Earth isn't putting on huge mass by the implosion of the field to give all the mass weight by implosion, Click Here for 10 reasons why/conundrums solved by this (for instance the Milky Way and other massive behemoths are spinning too fast so reradiation of the field might only reach out so far, nearer in the gravity without some shielding by the reradiant field would fall off faster, and the Pioneer anomaly might be caused by this also.).

Reradiation of the field would be of worth as a way out of the problem about implosion and causality, this was Einstein's idea in a simpler form about the reradiance of the low energy field, as I say on the conundrums link I hope to improve this by way of the more recent astronomy and possibly by other experiments. Perhaps the reradiation needed to make gravity not completely time reversed is where Einstein got this idea. At any rate if gravity is at the speed of light and radiates even a bit, this might be disproof either that gravity is at the speed of light, a likely conclusion based on relativity alone (in GWD it may be much faster and have many overlapping speeds) or disproof that faster than light motion of the field is impossible.


The overlapping speeds of the field would cause smooth space time even in quantum physics, one speed in and another speed out to avoid cancellation by resonance like the gravity in and the heat out of the Earth or solar heat. With gravity more time reversable than not, since light has constant speed and changing wavelength in the "more electromagnetic" speed of light of special relativity, gravity being mostly opposite might have both changing speed and wavelength both, this would be dependant on the semiquantum way of the low energy field (continuous but not completely so for definition and stability also of subatomic physics, the reradiance of massive bodies like the binary stars is low energy or there would be antigravity and we would fall off the earth.). With reduction of the confining quantum wells of the low energy field unlike light by Maxwell confined to constant speed by the constant electric charges and constant field density of 1 and -1, gravity would flow like a superfluid, changing its own speed and wavelength both at once. The change of speed not just wavelength would be one of the most defining distinctions between gravity and relativity, this is an acceleration not seen in uniform motion.



The Beauty About Truth the Truth About Beauty

Some women think being beautious would be of worth to them, why is there this belief in the power of beauty? Research proves that men can know if a woman wants children just by looking at picture of the lady. And looks influence your personality (just lifting my Pearl Visions makes me exercise!) What's the real meaning of beauty? The ancient Greeks believed in beauty, Aristotle and others believed that beauty is near the level of truth. And no doubt, your name can influence your personality. Women with a "creative" name are more likely ot achieve well in life and men are more likely ot do well with a more conservative name. This was the nomen omen of the Romans, when the person was born they believed the name had influence on where they would go to in life. Some say that looks are a sham and we should have no part of them. My belief is that looks are of some worth but not the higher worth in contrast to other things in life. The ancients didn't have much more than civilization so they looked for other ways to improve than just wealth, so they had cleansing and belief in beauty, of higher culture if your goal is a clean civilization. So when the landlady shows up and asks for the ransom and calls me handsome, I hand some to her!

LOTS OF RAIN HERE There's a higher purpose in life than just life, if I see 257 Dish TVS, it's a web memo about the rain the other day! I invented air filled feetwear I sail down the side of the road, and when I reached the inflow they pump more air to lift me up for more go rounds, the umbrella's the sail! It wasn't the super highway or road it was the Lake Huron highway! My Boat Shoes almost sank, there was so much wind I say hi and talk for hours with a woman in minutes who lives up the road!

...