Jets, Superfusion, and Energy Conservation
As I say on my other posts, black holes may not have a singularity where all the mass disappears because it would violate energy conservation. Energy conservation seems more fundamental than even Relativity because e.g. while relativity has small influence on our common physics around us, and there are insufficient causes, energy conservation is found on all scales and energy levels. To me Relativity is based on Noether's theorem, action reaction pairs of what changes and what stays the same, and energy conservation IS Noether's theorem.
If inside the supermassive body, the spins of the superheavy quanta are spinning faster than light, only then do they have enough centrifugal force to power the jets. I call the force of these heavy quanta Superfusion and they may be more powerful than Relativity.
Click Here for my life health, and wealth product list and straight to the biz sources of these main products on my Benable recommendation list..
I get paid a small amount at no extra cost to you..for each sale ..Thanks!
We don't find the superfusion quanta around us because to exist they need more pressure inside a mass like a black hole because when you look at constituent systems going from molecules to atoms to nuclei to the heavy quanta, there's a greater and greater binding energy to rest mass ratio so they need more and more binding energy, and beyond the level of the strong force, the superfusion quanta would tend to fizzle out by their own centrifugal force.
Due to the spin and the lower binding energy relative to it, the superfusion quanta are only stable inside the pressure of the center of the black hole. So all around us only the light and heavier quanta are common but not the superfusion quanta because there's not enough energy to hold them together outside of the high density by the squeezing of the gravitational field of what had been thought of by Einstein as otherwise to be infinite.
People have wondered why the jets radiate out as they do and this is pretty simple to explain by superfusion because the heavy superfusion quanta are so unstable. They're being continually created by the gravity of the black hole at the area where there would have been the singularity and because the binding energy tends to be lower and the center field gradient isn't perfectly spherical because of the spin..the force is released more on one side where the poles are than around the rest of the "singularity".
People have wondered why the jets radiate out as they do and this is pretty simple to explain by superfusion because the heavy superfusion quanta are so unstable. They're being continually created by the gravity of the black hole at the area where there would have been the singularity and because the binding energy tends to be lower and the center field gradient isn't perfectly spherical because of the spin..the force is released more on one side where the poles are than around the rest of the "singularity".
So in this scenario the low binding energy combined with the superfusion force causes the center of the jet to move up from the center of mass and this also makes the inner superfusion quanta follow the rest moving outward as they have already made the jet more asymmetrical and also because of the low binding energy of the superfusion.
They may become more unstable and fizzle out more but with super strong centrifugal force caused by the faster than light motion of the superfusion quanta to power the jets.
This seems impossible by relativity because if nothing can move faster than light then no force can be transmitted out from what would have been the singularity to the jets outside. There is otherwise no known force including fusion strong enough to power the jets, and gravity doesn't radiate out like the jets.
This seems impossible by relativity because if nothing can move faster than light then no force can be transmitted out from what would have been the singularity to the jets outside. There is otherwise no known force including fusion strong enough to power the jets, and gravity doesn't radiate out like the jets.
Click Here for my life health, and wealth product list and straight to the biz sources of these main products on my Benable recommendation list..
I get paid a small amount at no extra cost to you..for each sale ..Thanks!
In the Wikipedia article about the jets, two models of how the jets are powered are about how the black hole might transmit force by the accretion disc causing magnetic lines to spin outward and up to power the jets "from the outside"..another theory is about how frame dragging from General Relativity might power the jets by rotation, extracting spin out;
Jets may also be observed from spinning neutron stars. An example is pulsar IGR J11014-6103, which has the largest jet so far observed in the Milky Way, and whose velocity is estimated at 80% the speed of light (0.8c). X-ray observations have been obtained, but there is no detected radio signature or accretion disk.[19][20] Initially, this pulsar was presumed to be rapidly spinning, but later measurements indicate the spin rate is only 15.9 Hz.[21][22] Such a slow spin rate and lack of accretion material suggest the jet is neither rotation nor accretion powered, though it appears aligned with the pulsar rotation axis and perpendicular to the pulsar's true motion.
If the jet is powered "from.the inside" this could be explained. In engineering momentum transfer from a solid mass or used to make small mechanucal levers for storing data can send far more force per unit time. So if the jets are powered more by momentum transfer from the inside in addition to explaining pulsar IGR J11014-6103 and be the cause of most other jets this could allow this type of much huger more powerful events.
The observation of some bodies with high energy jets without a disc would also be explained by the source of the jets' mass being either from the disc but also from the massive gravitational field, lower energy outside yet high enough inside to convert to superfusion and as they evolve the massive bodies would increase and decrease in mass according to energy conservation by measure of the energy in and out with different ratios because of spin which changes the jet dynamics as well as the in falling mass and gravitational energy.
A spherical black hole with no disc and a given amount of spin with given mass will behave differently with changes in the jet, which may be predictable as a function of these events or for other jets of other massive bodies as more mass falls in.. By Einstein there is no mass of the field, by relativity it's empty. (Einstein said that if the low energy field is found, relativity is disproven.)
So this idea would explain how the jets work and why we don't see superfusion quanta all around us and why these events are not disproof of energy conservation, one of the most well-founded ideas in science.
Susskind and others have promoted the idea that a singularity at the center of a black hole is a "robust result of general relativity". But I would say that matter and energy disappearing forever with no cause of the jets or the anomalous spectra of the events outside these systems is hardly a "robust result" of energy conservation or general relativity!
Others have said "Calling ideas like Susskind's or Hawking's related idea that Energy is destroyed at the singularity "science" is not doing science a favor."
Susskind's idea violates energy conservation and Hawking and Susskind totally ignored the jets, evidence the mass from "the singularity" doesn't disappear at all.
While my idea is an hypothesis so far, it does explain why the jets exist, and also makes some definite predictions about the jets and the dynamics.
Click Here for my life health, and wealth product list and straight to the biz sources of these main products on my Benable recommendation list..
I get paid a small amount at no extra cost to you..for each sale ..Thanks!
We would expect if the spins of the superfusion quanta are faster as by shearing the electromagnetic fields of the more common quanta that we see around us, they're going to show unusual spectra and other events like these as they transition outward and interact with the lower energy decay products not seen in the standard model and with other events like this. And this has been found by observations.
By the Search "Evidence In Cosmic Jets Against the Standard Model of Physics in the Quant Browser;
"Evidence in Cosmic Jets Against the Standard Model of Physics
Recent observations of cosmic jets, particularly from the body SS 433, have provided intriguing evidence that challenges certain aspects of the Standard Model of physics. Here are some key points:
High-Energy Gamma Rays: The H.E.S.S. observatory detected very high-energy gamma rays from the jets of SS 433, indicating highly efficient particle acceleration. This challenges the Standard Model's predictions about particle acceleration mechanisms in astrophysical jets.
Energy-Dependent Morphology: The H.E.S.S. collaboration observed a shift in the position of gamma-ray emission within the jets when viewed at different energies. This energy-dependent morphology is a first-ever observation and suggests that the Standard Model may not fully account for the complex dynamics within cosmic jets.
Particle Acceleration: The detection of gamma rays implies that particles are being accelerated to extreme energies within the jets. The Standard Model does not provide a complete explanation for how or where this particle acceleration occurs in astrophysical jets.
Shock Acceleration: The scientists simulated the observed energy dependence of the gamma-ray emission and concluded that a strong shock—a sharp transition in the properties of the medium—is likely accelerating the particles. This shock acceleration mechanism is not fully explained by the Standard Model.
Inverse Compton Effect: The high-energy gamma rays are produced when fast particles collide with light particles (photons), transferring part of their energy. This process, known as the inverse Compton effect, is well-known but the specific conditions and mechanisms in cosmic jets that lead to such efficient particle acceleration are not fully understood within the framework of the Standard Model.
These observations from SS 433 and other cosmic jets suggest that there may be physics beyond the Standard Model that needs to be explored to fully understand the dynamics and particle acceleration mechanisms in these extreme astrophysical environments.
Also CLICK HERE for more
.
Note that in this link, the jet is collumnated beyond the level of the Standard Model or speed of light connection. But if a major component of gravity is Faster Than Light (not the speed of inertia as in LIGO which is much higher energy like centrifugal force, relativity etc. at the speed of light) this is not impossible. This acceleration outward induced more by superfusion than gravity which would follow it might also be the cause of cosmic acceleration by higher energy versions of superfusion at the center if the cosmos as we know it now and we might learn about each from both.
Inside the jet by the field gradient of superfusion moving outward, the gravitational component might first be resonating and in a higher rate of acceleration as a considerable number of the superfusion quanta also move outside the source of the jet with more and more acceleration as the binding energy is released.
Click Here for my life health, and wealth product list and straight to the biz sources of these main products on my Benable recommendation list..
I get paid a small amount at no extra cost to you..for each sale ..Thanks!
Looking at how the accretion disc falls into the event horizon, we might say that there's more mass there than there is at the poles, so it's also got more centrifugal force by superfusion. So why wouldn't those heavy quantum radiate out at the event horizon instead of the poles?
I find it highly improbable to assume that magnetic fields created by the accretion disc or by frame dragging will be enough to cause the accretion disc to send that matter and energy around the event horizon up to the poles and then it radiates out without falling into the event horizon. With the Earth even while there's more matter around the equator, the poles actually have stronger gravity and so we would say if that matter somehow went around the accretion disc and around outside the event horizon up to the pole and then starts to radiate out, improbable as this may seem, there's no reason with stronger gravity at the poles it wouldn't fall in there.
We say that there's a geometry of the disc as it goes around and the matter falls in and as with the sun, perhaps at one wavelength mass and energy gravitates in and another wavelength that would radiate out the heat, and so too I think of the accretion disc and falling into the singularity as a measure of a one-way valve for gravity to flow in, but the poles are a one-way valve for superfusion to flow out. This is because the disc is a circle and it rotates best around it just as in the solar system all the planets are by the ecliptic because there's both more centrifugal and centripetal force. But even for planets like the Earth, the magnetic and geologic poles are at much the same point.
So while the gravity is super strong to bring in the matter from the accretion disc at the poles, the superfusion is even stronger than that. Much like saying that the matter falling into the sun is great, but the heating outward is greater yet. Mostly mass has the accretion disc around it because it's a circle, orbiting around the pole and less stable so soon it gravitates around the event horizon at any rate.
If the singularity is a more complex physical event than by general relativity and a signal like from the jets can reach the outside, I think it's possible that there may be even eclipses of black holes with changes in orbit not predicted by relativity, like with binary systems perhaps with a pulsar and a black hole and another massive body in orbit.
If the singularity is a more complex physical event than by general relativity and a signal like from the jets can reach the outside, I think it's possible that there may be even eclipses of black holes with changes in orbit not predicted by relativity, like with binary systems perhaps with a pulsar and a black hole and another massive body in orbit.
On this Wikipedia page about the cosmic Jets and superluminal motion, earlier researchers had found that almost all of them are many times the speed of light. However, other physicists made the claim that because you're looking at the Jets linearly towards you, this is just more like sort of an optical illusion like looking at a shadow moving across a curved surface that seems to be faster than light.
While the linear radiation idea seemed to explain the apparent motion at first there was the embarrassment found that the jets were also with too large an angle for this apparent motion to be the explanation. I believe that if superfusion powers the jets we would indeed expect to find superluminal velocities for the jets.
While special relativity tells us that we can't add our own motion to the speed of light, this is itself based on the assumption that there is no motion possible faster than light. The embarrassment about the speed being more than had been believed by relativity may be the solution.
While special relativity tells us that we can't add our own motion to the speed of light, this is itself based on the assumption that there is no motion possible faster than light. The embarrassment about the speed being more than had been believed by relativity may be the solution.
In addition to jets from high energy sources without a disc seen, astronomers have also observed super massive bodies with no jets, and this may also be caused by stable mass inside the black hole..As I say on my next link, the center of density may be state of matter with superfusion quanta at the center and outside perhaps even protons and other heavy quanta with enough shielding to stop the jets activity. If so this is a complex event, and so it's possible Einstein's idea that gravity and the singularity are simple and are also not about energy conservation aren't as general as he believed.
CLICK HERE for my page "Mass and Energy" if you like for more about this..Thanks..
