Why Do Black Holes Have Only 50% of The Mass Predicted By Simple La Sage Gravity?
The ghost particle method shows by simple calculations the rate at which black holes would increase in mass.Yet observations show they are gaining mass at just half the rate.
I was much puzzled by this and I had thought of a fifth and sixth force of the singularity to solve the infinite gravity problem that Einstein was much concerned about. Einstein wasn't confident in this and it was why he removed black holes from his beliefs about physics for awhile, like 100 years!
Even while Special Relativity predicted potential infinities, the singularity would have the same problem. (Also I may ask about Einstein, why are infinities allowed in Special Relativity, yet not in General Relativity? Actually that there should be no infinities in either Special Relativity SR or General relativity I would say if either both are true or untrue, if for General Relativity, so should SR also not be with the infinite. I don't believe in them more than Einstein and my more general idea would be that SR is an extension of gravity, all the quanta around us are frozen gravity converted to quanta by the gravity force of the implosion of the field here and neither gravity or SR has infinities. This is my idea of GWD or general wave Dynamics, a more non relativistic idea about all the forces, not just the "thermodynamic" speed of light of relativity, which Einstein hopes to awkwardly fit into gravity.) See my Physics Synopsis link upper left, Click Here or see link at the end of the page.
In a way, not allowing the infinities solves the singularity problem of gravity while allowing the possibility of faster than light non infinities with Special Relativity, as I say on my youtube, "metv," video (Click Here or see link at end of post) about using a Higgs' laser or hopes of using a particle spin method to hope to achieve faster than light motion in what I call the Relativistic Wind Tunnel RWT, see post below about my thoughts about the RWT or click here.. By using a quantum spin conveyer belt moving the Higgs' out from a zone of few Higgs' might allow a small mass in the RWT to move with reduced inertia by pumping away the Higg's. This might reduce the infinities of SR. I would say if Einstein tries to stop some of the infinite problem of General Relativity, he might have also realized that Special Relativity also has this to solve, or this seems so to me.
As I say here on my OTHER youtube Video! I believe if each quanta is with a history of EPR codes, yet by entanglement the codes are caused, the two quanta find just that code, yet the Higgs' allows a large number of Higgs codes around each quanta to find just that quanta, this may be the cause of gravity also by the codes of each quantum causing acceleration as it drags around the Higg's on the outside. This may set the code with each event possibly storing huge amounts of data about history of events. And this might allow huge amounts of data storage by using a Higgs' laser to read and write, as well as a super high resolution microscope or telescope to mine the data, it may be seen otherwise not seen in the quanta of light. Click Here for Video, or See link below.
Of course Einstein believed faster than light was possible, and he said if one of his ideas go they all go. The infinities of relativity seem so inefficient in the sense that they aren't efficient. If you want to go faster than light, or faster than sound, there may be machines for this eventually.
NASA is doing research about Faster Than Light travel, so perhaps this idea about the Higgs' or some other machine method may be viable.
If the singularity is with a fifth and sixth force that are spinning faster than light if mass is spinning energy, the spin with more centrifugal force wouldn't collapse to infinity. This might solve Einstein's insomnia about the singularity, and as T'hooft has noted though not by the method of faster than light by GWD, this saves energy conservation, a major problem otherwise with an infinite singularity. And the faster than light radiance outward of the jet also allows the anomalous spectra of the jets, which are not explained by the standard model.
About The LIGO experiment that seems to prove gravity is at the speed of light, see my posts below. Einstein believed gravity and inertia are the same thing, so if the results of LIGO are not an error, I believe the LIGO is only a measure of the speed of inertia at the speed of light and not gravity.
You may be aware that Japanese physicists in the early 90's made the discovery that a gyroscope spinning in one direction at high speed weights slightly less than one spinning in the other direction, which weighs the same.
One thing I wondered about was why the jets of supermassive stars or radio sources have almost as much mass seen moving out one jet as the other. If the source is ionizing it would seem to separate plus and minus charges and by Newton's second law one jet should move faster than the other. While black holes are seen to be super ionizing, I think if the fifth force involves heavy particles and antiparticles, if one spins in the opposite sense it would radiate out the ghost particles while the antiparticle here (of what I call superfusion) would attract as usual by gravity and so indeed the massive source of the gravity would increase at only half the rate, and the jets are indeed mostly symmetrical as seen by the astronomy. The outflow from only the superfusion particle and not the antiparticle would make the outflow of both jets of the same type of mass and energy. Another explanation is that gravity is mostly nonquantum and so it wraps around in a sphere.
Black holes increase in mass with time. The massive black holes at the center of galaxies have 1000 times more mass than they should by the visible matter seen falling in. This is easily solved by the ghost particle method, and so too the problem of dark matter itself, like what you press on as you jog around the room, or what the starship accelerates against, and so on.
Remember the Higgs is believed to exist at lower and lower energy states, at the lowest state it's stable, so the low energy and superfast way to both store and send force by the fast speed of the waves may be how dark matter or what I call DGE dark gravitational energy have remained unseen yet by experiment yet they change our life definitely with force as you go around in the road machine.
But the black holes aren't gaining mass at exactly half the rate. The actual rate gives us a way to calculate by way of how much force is moving the jets outward and also since we know how much more the gyroscope at the given rate weighs less, we can then find the actual rate the black hole gains mass with time if also allowing the amount of common matter falling in to find the ghost particle mass contribution..
You might wonder if the superfusion antiparticles weigh less, this would seem to change the mass of the black hole and so it would weigh about half the observed value and thus not weigh any more or gain mass at any other rate than half the mass at any rate. But weight isn't the same as mass as I say on my posts below. The mass may be internal to quanta like the superfusion particles, while weight may move in the spaces between the quanta, so gravity doesn't shield or have quantum numbers like quanta and so on. I would think the superfusion antiparticle may have the same gravity yet fling out more of the ghost particles by short range centrifugal force. Relativity doesn't say how there's no mass induction around the outside of a centrifuge, unlike the equivalent massive gravitational source.
As I say elsewhere, two of the the main problems with Lasage method for gravity or indeed the Higgs' method of mass with ghost particles are about friction with the particles slowing masses as they move, and also e.g. about how particles radiate outward like a gas if they have sides yet gravity is implosive. My answer here is that below a certain energy, the external weight field between the quanta changes phase to a superfluid and has negative entropy, as superfluids often flow from cold to hot. The superfast superlight speed of gravity may wrap around the quanta of visible matter and unify so fast the slow speed of light motion of the particles as all quanta is not enough to overpower the thermodynamic common radiant form of entropy. Another problem with Lasage Gravity that Feynman considered was about the Earth gaining much mass per second by the implosion of the ghost particles. I believe in almost wavelike ghost particles so they might radiate into the Earth between the quanta without friction, and then change phase to the outward moving waves in cycles and go in loops to mostly conserve energy for gravity.
A good reason to believe neither the inertial or the gravity events aren't quantum mostly is in Maxwell's belief that the low energy field can't be "molecular" (atomic or quantum) because you do things like heat it and it would boil away and have other problems with discontinuity. Even so the inertial particles if they are indeed (at any rate!) at the speed of light by LIGO would be quantum by way of Einstein's idea that light in relativity is constant uninfluenced from the source to the observer. Uninfluenced seem like quantum, and quantum like relativity is balanced where the in and out waves are equal, so I believed all quanta are limited at the speed of light via relativity. If the gravity particles however with enough outside force are faster than light for supermassive sources like black holes they might move inward at faster than light. Even so for most of the low energy physics around us unlike black holes or like the fractional charge in Chou's shelftop experiments, the speed of light would limit quanta. There has never been any disproof of relativity in quanta that have unified electric charge at more radius. (I believe this may not be coincidence and indeed the cause or symmetry of confinement in QCD. The electric field quantum numbers and the other quantum numbers all are just so and would fit due to a strong influence by Einstein. The exceptions to this may be inside the heavy quanta (via QCD) or other areas of super high mass density. The extra ways to move inside the heavy quanta like baryons indeed would only be allowable if relativity was disproven and yet they must always add up to the nonfractional speed of light. Even so there are no quantum numbers for relativity other than the speed of light and the electric charges. In my belief, the only way the muon could suddenly have more mass as you add more above the electron level of energy is by faster than light spin inside the muon if mass is spinning energy and the other extra quantum numbers for heavy quanta have no comment in relativity.)
My Youtube Video, Click Here For How the Higgs May Light Up History, and Other Uses of the Higgs' Laser
For my ideas about why gravity and inertia aren't the same thing, see the following post.
