Why Time Asymmetry Seems to Be Evidence That Relativity is Incomplete

If mass and energy are equivalent like particles (more like mass) and antiparticles (energy) time would be reversable.

Time is only reversable like the spins of the particles like little clocks (all time is always measured by periodic oscillation and it's a well proven idea that time is proportional to frequency) at higher energy with quanta. If for longer range than just a bit the spins are aligned with the field where the direction of the spin is only an allowed value at high energy so all the collisions are simple, like reversing billiard balls.

Spins are about time and aren't aligned in common mass all around us, while Feynmann believed that for the short time after matter and antimatter interact reversal is possible because time is indeed always measured by spin and frequency, at greater distance the spin isn't aligned so it gets much more complex and time would be much tougher to reverse.

Thus time is reversable at high energy with the quanta of Emc2 , more spinning mass, just that much more linear energy as Einstein believed while at lower energy it's not. But lower energy physics are much more common than higher energy or at any rate gravity would be the creation field that is lower energy and unifies the energy conservation, ect.

Thus lower energy physics not energy conservation and Einstein's idea of mass energy equivalence may be the most important physics not e=mc2 or relativity,
if time is assymetrical from future to past this makes sense.

If mass and energy were equivalent, time would be reversable.

The assymetry of time is evidence that although the quanta are of worth, there is a more definite foundation in waves of gravity being more important than particles.

If mass and energy are truly not the same, one will be of more worth than the other and relativity wouldn't be not the most general causology, and Einstein's mass energy equivalence seems perhaps to be a reflection but not the foundation so it may not double the cash in the mirror of mass energy or matter antimatter being the same, it's of worth but it seems incomplete.

That mass and energy are unalike would explain why matter and antimatter seem so counterintuitave. If matter and antimatter are the same, why not true and false? Science with it's way of knowing this itself would be disproven.

And this would be why indeed there is more matter than antimatter. Gravity if assymetrical and the foundation makes time and matter and antimatter with the same distinction.


THEY FOUND NERO'S HOUSE (09 9 29th) BOOOOO! Or well, You know...

Archeologists have unearthed a giant spinning dining room that was in ancient times often mentioned with Nero at the center so he would be "like the sun" with it in rotation with the Earth's 24 hours so no shadows (in the night they laughed at Nero when no one was aware!) and the room was 50 feet round and had wheels underneath powered by water, with a roof that could drop flowers and scents on the audience. The golden house of Nero was built on the ruins of Rome that burned in Nero's fire while he was 37 miles away in his villa and the violin was not yet invented, so the old saying that Nero fiddled while Rome burned is not the "real" history some say. The Dining room was mentioned by numerous ancient sources and the golden house built with money taken from the country was so vast took up three of the 7 hills of Ancient Rome.

Originally the dining room overlooked lakes that were later drained and the Colisseum was built by the Emperor Vespasian. You may know that Nero was not much liked then or in the 21st century. Who knows? Eventually!
~~