About the future of truth sensors, pain sensors and other advanced methods of finding out who's being kind or not as by AI or other new patented technology may have value.
Mri, Lie Detectors, Truth, Evolution, Ethics, Real Estate, Nature, Evolution of Behavior, Technology, Pain sensors, Healthcare, Brain health, Neurology, Economy, Economics,
MRI may be used for truth sensors.. my belief is more portable machines that amplify the voice using a small handheld radar that can pick up both breathing and pulse event and thus the verbal thought may be possible. This is because recent studies have shown that you think verbally by making motions of your voice box.
All thought has been seen to be connected to physical change in physiology so it's probable that something like verbal thought may also be associated with a sort of area where the thought is defined well to improve the value of the event.
Also this is about AI. As speech recognition becomes more powerful apps to sense word content may be important because 60% of the poor people say when they go to the doctor they feel that they are being harassed. The United Nations is working on an app to sense who is saying kind words or not.
Antinoise also known as good old sound cancellation like solid golden ancient times on FMs may be valuable because it's an old saying that the truth abounds in quiet places. We could say that who has to listen to what may be definitely changed by this method.
Pain sensors that can tell who's really in pain or not may also be valuable. Huge legal battles are going on between patients and their doctors. Patients and their lawyers may love it when they relax and want to be rich at higher speed! Doctors may not be so thrilled about it.
The minimum settlement for example for a medical malpractice suit where the lab work is unreliable is a million dollars. Hospitals make on the average four medical mistakes for hour and they stay in business by settling these lawsuits out of court. Even so of course most doctors are legitimate and do mean well.
This has been a year of many brain sensing patents in 2023! Giant brain sensing anyhow! About 40 patents have been issued.
Any of these type of events about the patents presumably will be getting stronger with time.
Studies have also shown your brain shows little distinction between behavioral pain or discomfort and actual physical pain. So when people go to the doctor and are sometimes denied care and are in pain as well as harassed for that, these machines may help with both of those causes.
Another improvement in people's ability to improve brain health has been with new pharmaceuticals like cotinine, a tobacco metabolite. This is like a b vitamin for the brain.
When people would smoke cigarettes in the old days they said they felt it makes them feel like a rocket scientist. This turned out to be true.. cotanine acts like nicotine but without the addiction and with no drowsiness. It even reverses memory loss in late stage Alzheimer's.
It's being studied for use as a painkiller, a way to lose weight and a great way to feel real about infomercials! We must have saved more!
Many of these patents may be valuable to find out people who do immoral things when out of the sight of most.
For example people who are involved with domestic abuse, doctors who may cause harm, and for the 20,000 or so slaves being held housebound in the United States for which it's been said there was little hope of rescue, may also find improvements sooner or later with these sensors
In the old days experts say it was the age of great health and now this is "the age of great disease". Doctors are now the leading cause of death mostly with accidents caused by prescriptions.
You could say doctors were leading the way upward for life and now they're leading the way down to death.
Unexpected medical bills are the main cause of debt even though 97% say they are insured enough. The health care system is the only big business where the consumer has no say in the quality of the product they receive.
While a lot of healthcare professionals have good intent a lot of people would like things like this to change so society is able to better defend itself. It seems not improbable that a major percentage of the deaths caused by doctors are not by accident but rather because the doctor wants to secretly cause harm. So patients may find much more delight and this may literally save the lives of millions of people.
One question that many have asked is about the MRI sensors or other sensors that may be used in the future as lie detectors. How would this turn out? And I looked up on the web, where is it? I found the internet to be, bright right here!
Where's the sci-fi story about what this will be like? And you can't find one. So here I like to write a bit of Fi of my own since I can read a lot of hi-fi and have faith in optimum audios.
And so here- rewind me up!- as they say they may start with sensors like MRI in the corporations at the top where the money can pay for a good enough sensor. And then they'll work their way down by way of "trust", from where machines are most viable and the money to see who's telling the truth or not about what.
And so that's the start. It'll be I think where we'll look in the headlines and we see "Wow, the truth sensors are lighting up the world".
And from there they say it may proceed by leaps and bounds to get more and more powerful sensors.
Soon they'll have them, and after that, I think will be used for events like removing healthcare fraud.
And they say in the the top businesses like in the car automobile fraud business, like bogus parts, this will help the customers with the automobiles they're selling, I want to be a customer who's selling real automobiles, with wheels!
Also I think in the healthcare industry they're going to remove the most harmful elements because they say it's where most of them hide out.
And beyond, what what will happen once the sensors become more established?
I think we can imagine that for example about realtors, they want to know who's telling the truth about what. So they might start having mandatory testing, exams with the truth sensor when the tenant signs up. And so this would be where they'll find out the history of what kind of things that are bad about the tenant.
We can imagine though that they'll only do that for a while where they accept that's the way they have to pay perhaps more as they go. But mostly they won't be wounded.
They'll recover and then they'll be stronger for it because this will stop a whole lot of the other stuff that goes on between Realtors and their "employees"!. And there's a lot more that goes on. It's like daily violations of trust by way of small lies, fibulas, or liettes!
It's not illegal to lie. Even so, I think this would be a major boost for the poor people when they're dealing with people who are lying so often that having the truth being proven would be more powerful for a lot of people. A lot of people might get a whole lot of money, like from doctors for cheating on them. Like the poor person goes to the emergency room and the doctor is 20 times less likely to give them anesthesia if they've broken their leg or whatever.
Other research has shown how the police are arresting the poor people 20 times more often than others for marijuana in the city even while other studies have found they use it no more than the other people. So this is perhaps how the self-defense of the poor people and people in general would evolve. And we ask what's the nature of the truth?
I wish life was like the Andy Griffith Show!
You may have seen the episode where Andy is telling Opie, he's going to start a newspaper there in Mayberry.. and he says, “Always tell the truth”. So he starts listening to all the gossip around town and writing about this and what and who says she is the mother!
And they get so upset about it, he says, "Let's throw away that darn paper, freedom of speech. Who cares about that what's the truth worth, right?” And then at the end of the episode, Andy and Barney secretly go down to the dump and they are down there trying to secretly read the gossip and find others like themselves also "down the dumps" where they buy software! And what's so funny about this? Well, because the truth has value.
We hear this in the United States. By U.S. law, it's not illegal to lie. And we have the freedom to be imperfect. We can make some mistakes and not be where there's a lawsuit going on.
There have been lawsuits according to the Radiolab show such as the one about a student in the subway in New York who was attacked, and the police were in a room in front of the subway and they knew that he was there but didn't help them. He was being attacked by a serial killer and he got stabbed in the face about five times. And he finally wrestled him down and won after the killer killed 5 people before. But the police didn't help him, so he tried to sue them, but he didn't win the trial.
And also another lawsuit was about a lady whose estranged husband was really mad at her. She knew he was going to try to cause harm and she called the police repeatedly and they didn't help. And so finally her husband killed their three beautiful daughters and he then ended up shooting the police station and he died after being killed.
So the lady tried to sue also for people to say, look, she deserved protection. She also lost this lawsuit.
She said she felt like her children had been murdered twice..and Radiolab says that this is ultimately part of the cost we pay for freedom. Thomas Jefferson and the other founding fathers would say leave the people alone. Because even though people do have things like that happen sometimes, they can't force the police to help them. The founding fathers believed that in general freedom has more value than perfection after all perfection doesn't exist right away, maybe in a few months!
And they say, what's the job of the police? As they say on the show,” there are few laws that say exactly what the police should do."
It's like the ungoverned part of the the justice system or the government. The rest of the government has laws and statutes governing each event.
And they're saying on the Radio Lab episode that they really don't have anything like this for the police much.
There are a few of them here and there in different states, different counties, but they don't have anything near to a uniform way of saying what they should do about what.
And so on that episode, they call up about 50 police officers around the country in their stations, and they ask them what their job is and they say, oh, they hurt with the guilty and to help the guilty stop! Or help the innocent more.
And they say "to protect and promote", right. But when you think about it, what the police do mostly, they investigate claims and they try to basically find who's guilty and who's innocent. And in that most basic and most important sense of what they do, they really are protecting and promoting.
And the police weren't wrong in saying that when they called up them up and asked them what they do. They are protecting the innocent and stopping the guilty. Even so, we ask what would the police be able to do if they had a really good truth sensor.
And surveillance, it's sort of a dream come true for the police, but where would they stop?
Like one of the store managers where I live in the store near here, wants to be wealthy! She's there one day and the police stop and say can I see your business license and she says, right. But what happens if the police had a really good sensor as they get cheaper and lighter and portable and they could ask her more questions without the CEO even really knowing it.
We're not allowed by the Constitution to testify against ourselves. I think the sensors are not really like that because just so they're not asking them what their stuff is in their house, they can search their house. They're not really asking them to testify against themselves, to search their house if they have the right or a necessary cause to search the house.
So I think this is not a fundamental objection to the truth sensors. Even so what will keep the police from having more elaborate searches?
And as I say, the Constitution allows us to have the freedom to be imperfect. And so on the end of the Andy Griffith show following where Opie is telling the truth about those people and they're so upset, this sort of shines a harsh light on the truth. It could make it so people are really quite uncomfortable, I'm sure. And I could see why.
In the Constitution, it's the ability it seems to be forgiven for our imperfections more often than in other countries. And so the law is sort of forgiving a lot of us and also it's tough to enforce laws 100%.. The police can't just arrest anybody for jogging. Watch exercise shows in rewind and put on 15 lbs! They wouldn't about minor goofs, they can't always..
And so I would ask what's the value of forgiveness. So they would have the machines with perhaps a weighted value of what they would overlook or not.
You know they ask the questions, but they don't ask them so much that they're harming privacy. And this could be done by a weighted value. And we ask, well, how could they do that? The police might not be held accountable because there are all these laws where the police are being held less and less accountable.
But I think the way society can do that is actually to have truth sensors also keeping track of the police by a peer-to-peer sort of truth network like Wikipedia, the Marms Alarm! And so there'll be reduced cheating and the truth will have a boost in value. And this might seem to be theoretical, but it's hardly out of the question.
This is a possible way to solve the problem "What's to keep the police from searching too much?"
Whatever we may say the value of sensors like this are, due to the balance of the evidence and other
events I think like an a legal sense this may be the way it will work out.
Other technology like this or reducing overcrowding as I say may cause other changes, but this kind of technology maybe with us indefinitely. It's going to definitely be causing changes we might want to learn to anticipate for the best result.
This is how the future may be, the way they're improving these machines, I think this might be the real wit about wit sensors!
THE DEEPER EVIDENCE
My belief is while sensors may have value like this, there's a deeper way to solve how doctors and others in society have changed as in ancient Rome when Juvenal asked, "Who watches the watchers of the watched?"
The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer, and I think this may have to do with how people have treated the world in general. People have been really abusive of the ecosystem and with the predators removed, overpopulation has been increasing.
This is a fundamental change about territory and all the resources in it because it's changing supply and demand. With decreasing room per capita, competition increases in an artificial way and all other resources are also limited like by an economic limit.
Most people are losing money on this and this may be the deeper cause of the increased division between people like doctors and their patients or the rich and the poor. This is essentially evidence of illness. And we ask why would the rich want to burden most of the rest? This seems unnatural and immoral. After all in the evolution of behaviour good and evil not smart or dumb or good or bad looks are most important. Due to this, lack of morality is the weakest behavior. So to ask why a few wealthy or powerful people may want weakness would be answered because people have been unjust to evolution, and evolution's balance is returning by causing this.
Reducing the overcrowding may be a way to make those who want oversurveillance not to be intrusive by it being more like in earlier history. Sensors may offer some relief for a while from this problem, but I think nothing would satisfy like reducing population to levels like it was as the ancient world was ascending, or in the 1600s after the plague had removed a thousand years of squalor. If people are wise they may reduce the overcrowding and go back to more golden ages.
If people have done something really unjust to nature it's not surprising the conservative or "bad" people would say that they couldn't deserve to all these luxuries, rights and conveniences. Most "miracles" to me seem to be by the Golden Rule, all the miracles like sensors or science that people have may be no match for it. I believe the use of science like sensors may be good but only if we cooperate with evolution so she will cooperate with us. Otherwise most people may have it like in china where the sensors are being used against them.
If life in the desert is measured by water, the ability to have room to move or breathe is going to have profound influence on most aspects of most people's lives.
For more about about this and how we can reduce the overcrowding for example with GE like CRISPR before the overcrowding more completely chokes off most people's source of advantage and other wealth.
HERE'S THE LINK to my post about Evolution, Overcrowding and it's Historic Influence..
