WHY DO PULSARS SLOW DOWN YET MORE MASSIVE BODIES SPEED UP BY "GRAVITY WAVES".

 Pulsars may slow down not the Galaxys because the pulsar has strong inertia or centrifugal force yet the galaxys have more gravity plus centrifugal force. If inertia and gravity are not the same but related the pulsar will slow down much faster if what it's really emitting is inertial radiation like for centrifugal force which is much stronger than gravity that presumably moves at the speed of light as by relativity as found by LIGO but it's radiating outward not inward like gravity.. a prediction is that the rate of radiating out of the energy of pulsars and galaxies with time should show a slight decrease in the rate of decrease because the gravity waves are radiating in and tending to speed it up (and thus not slow it down fast!) with time. Masses of cosmic size would add mass with more spin with time in their evolution.

  We might ask if all the masses around us have attraction and seem to be radiating both inertial waves and gravity waves like this, how much are nearby masses around us in the lab losing or absorbing energy by gravity waves with time? If the waves that LIGO has found are essentially about centrifugal force or inertia I would hold that a centrifuge like an ultra centrifuge may  actually be losing energy with time at the rate predicted by LIGO (not for the rate of gravity radiation which would not be changed much at all because gravity would be so much faster than the spinning gyroscope and without as much gravitational mass like the galaxies.)

Actually the gyroscope might be spinning slower as predicted by LIGO radiation yet not quite as slow because of the tendency to otherwise speed up of the gravity waves. This could be definite proof of my idea that gravity and inertia are not the same as Einstein held in relativity. 

 To get the most pure measure of the gravity radiation we might want to at least move it away from a massive body like the Earth.

 If my theory is correct common masses around us will be emitting much more energy by inertia as LIGO has measured and like the pulsar, it's general energy change at any rate! in the rate of spin (probably not weight because it's been disproven) may be offset by a small amount by the tendency for the gravity waves to increase its mass and slow down at a slower speed  yet not spin faster with larger masses like 100 or 200,000 light years.

 

I believe the reason the pulsars are spinning slower while the galaxies are spinning faster may be because while pulsars are radiating out inertia as found by the speed of light waves of LIGO, the galaxies are also doing this and are rotating as solid bodies, but also absorbing much more gravity because they aren't the same thing.

 While it might seem improbable to  find gravity wave radiation for masses around us, but this is actually what Einstein thought for old electrons.  He predicted that old electrons would change mass in the gravitational field of the Earth.

 It would seem we might measure inertial waves with LIGO and so measure changes in the mass around us by the same event..