..
The strong force may be faster than light in my generalization of Maxwell's causology that changes in the density of the field may cause different speeds some faster than light in what I call GWD or General Wave Dynamics (Click Here for synopses). The implosion of the heavy particle field of subatomic physics would be by definition a black hole of small radius, and even if it is actually slower than light, the higher acceleration of the strong force than most fields would still create Hawking radiation, so Hawking's belief that small black holes would always radiate power by Hawking radiation seems to need explanation. (His belief that substantial black holes would always multiply up in power like Einstein also held may not be so if the jets of massive power of BL-Lacs, and other strong radio sources, and massive heavenly bodies would often have as much output of power as the implosion to conserve momentum, so often no more mass would be added to the black holes of cosmic size. Even so Einstein believed mass multiplies up to more mass, so while in general there may be more mass augmentation like in the evolution of galaxies where they are known to multiply up the mass apparently by implosion of the low energy particles of the field [no other source of the mass is seen] and since this has been observed with other massive bodies, there may be exceptions because of the possibility of the outflow of jets so Hawking and Einstein's belief about this may be incomplete.) Even if the strong force doesn't turn out to be faster than light its density is still so high it should emit Hawking radiation by way of its stronger acceleration than strong magnetic fields, which are already known to emit radiation of the same type as Hawking predicted. In the mechanism of Radiation envisioned by Hawking and others, a particle and antiparticle can be created out of the low energy electric field of a large massive star or other mass of super density if the field strength is energised to strong enough and the particle falls in when the antiparticle radiates away if it's lighter. If there is radiation like Hawking Radiation for super strong magnetic fields and in the field near heavy atomic nuclei in the lab it seems there may also be radiation much like Hawking Radiation for stars with high enough ionization or other high energy astronomy that might cause evaporation of these stars at the rate Hawking predicts. Hawking believes that if you have some radiation, when the black hole evaporates it would evaporate faster and faster leading to explosions of these small supermassive black holes left over from the Big bang. While I think the explosions of the small black holes at a slower rate are not impossible that may be seen by astronomers as Hawking believes, a heavy particle being like a small black hole and that has implosion at Faster Than Light either may be disproof of Hawking's idea unless either heavy mesons and baryons aren't the same as other super dense masses. This may be why the predicted explosion rates of black holes left over from the Big Bang Hawking believed in are not yet found. Faster than light implosion of a proton or a massive star itself may engulf most of the radiation including radiation of this type (not the cosmic jets) for some or most super massive fields.
Why the strong force doesn't create outward radiation, whatever the speed? Any field that's stronger than the magnetic fields already proven to be like Hawking Radiation would seemingly also cause it. One possible explanation may be that the somewhat faster than light motions of the fractional electric charges (which would lighten up their charges [in my causology of GWD] to travel faster than light, so a charge of 1/3 would spin at 3 times the speed of light or a charge of 2/3 at 3/2 the speed of light) found by the tunneling experiments of Chin would augment mass by way of friction with motion through the field like in special relativity at higher speed and this greater mass would increase centrifugal force so the forces may balance and no radiation is seen if the orbits are also quantized enough to resist the radiation. Another possible explanation may be that the strong force being only attractive and fluid and more wavelike may be inefficient and accelerate the fractional particles to just somewhat faster than light and no more, gravity being only attractive like the strong force, might do the same in the celestial realm of high energy fields caused by gravity with much of the lower energy field slipping past the denser high energy matter like electric charges. Gravity needs to have extra force to continually wind up the cosmos and violate energy conservation overall (which would be the cause of the otherwise unexplained thermodynamic entropy. Although entropy doesn't violate conservation of motion like the First Law it seems ot violate conservation of motive power because it would have reached 0 power in a haze of subatomic particles of infinite time of energy being neither created or destroyed with quanta and higher energy fields) so much of the gravitational field may be adding it's own energy (a definition of the most fundamental acceleration) and while the overall quantity of gravitational motion is finite, the degree of slipping past the higher energy fields may not be of the same cause as strict quanta where it's E=mc2 because the gravitational quanta may be more wavelike and the flow in and out of the gravitational quanta may be more like a superfluid. Below the energy of the subatomic realm the field may lose most of its resistance and move much faster than light as in Einstein's EPR and this is why no lower energy quanta are yet seen, there would be a semi quantum field with more wavelike and less quanta or particulate nature. That the known particles are stable and presumably made of the lower energy fields themselves (to conserve energy with all the higher energy fields being made of lower ones as in GWD) means the lower energy field is still at least particulate to some extent to balance the otherwise infinite wavelike nature, but not as much as say, a muon. The lower energy quanta could have lower "walls" so the field inside them may flow in and out at higher speed and with reduced friction too. The known EPR isn't of high energy and a bit of shaking disrupts the EPR event so the distant fields are no longer unified. so the low energy nature of the EPR may mean that the fields are still particulate although with more waviness and acceleration than more common fields, this if there is more acceleration we might even expect the field to accelerate with distance like gravity. If the field is lighter and superfluid it may accelerate much faster than light, but if the speed is found it may be much like gravity, or electrogravity to mediate the angular and linear momenta between gravity and electricity to mostly conserve energy. It can't be electromagnetic because when electric charges cancel like in an atom the mass and inertia are much the same, like for the earth, and it thus may weave in and out of the high energy field easily shaping and molding it like in special relativity by way of the EPR (the change in the speed of the high speed observer changes the information about the wavelength of light "instantly" or the wavelength wouldn't change before it reaches the observer unless it were faster than the light itself) even so it may be mostly like gravity and have much to do with the cause of it. The molding in special relativity would have both enough definition remold the field with accleration while still having enough fluidity like a wave to become more completely in balance in uniform motion, vwalah, the speed and the wavelength of light are constant! If this is the way special relativity operates it would mean entanglement is more general than just for particles that have first been unified then seperated. This as I generally have said earlier would be bad news for quantum cryptography which would rely on the entanglement being the only link between two observers, with more general entanglement which we might expect if entanglement is how gravity operates by attraction and thus unifies the fields like in Special Relativity.
Einstein believed that pressure increases mass and so does mass. Thus if entanglement is about mass and gravity (a nonlinear acceleration) a way to test this idea of Me Myself and Einstein and Hawking may be to take two given masses and measure the gravity between them with an atomic clock and then increase or decrease the masses to see if the force of the gravity increases linearly or multilpies up a bit more than by energy conservation as Einstein believed.
If the EPR is about the way gravity operates I think it may also change strength in a nonlinear way and in proportion to the change in the gravity between the masses if they are changed in the line between the EPR events.
If this is trye~~~..
