CD ROM/Softwares Greatest Hits Volume 10,000!
Computing has been compared to the old days of barnstorming the airships. Often you don't know what's where and crashes are common. Some say like with the airplane we need to invent the wheel and brakes for computing too. Essentially I think there are two problems; computers are unpredictable and often with no explanations for what the computer does. (Randomness influences overuse behaviour like gambling, and this is not the best about computers, Solutions for computer overuse..) You might say about this it's not like where you say to a secretary, "move this ream of paper to file 36-27" and they would without harm to any rule of marms, law, or physics (it would be much more like a Hoosier Euro Millions Cashpot.) The stuff of software legend is more than micro. I've often had a box on one side of my machine I couldn't move to the other without years of labor. My mother lost her password and half a book she had been authorshipping, I've heard where some can't stop their printer from typing out a round wheel of print like in the old world where poets would write rhymes in the shape of usual items, a throne, a lyra, a ye old cyberchip! One problem is about compatibility.While computers may speak the same general language, they're often lousy at translation, and this may be solved by a complete restructure of the architecture of the web and all the computers. Just as a bit is simple, a more universal and readable code that was the same even in the higher levels of meaning would make them noncombatable.
About money many people are learning so many codes, lots of us might seem to vote to stay with the web as it is, like in the typewriter's familiar asdf. It was originally designed to slow down typers so they wouldn't type so fast the keys whirr of clicks and bells were in silence. While they tried to change it when the speed was higher, so many typists had learned it so well no business machine business could change it. Many would say all the huge cash put into the codes would make it so there would be too much resistance to much altering the web, so the longer we stay with the web and computers as they are, the tougher it may be to say Aloha, Welcome To Where Are We? With DNA where if some of the DNA is missing they are finding ways to add synth to revive the ancient life, the new internet might be able to just fill in the blank spots in the code with all the code before the same. This is just to copy the code and it would complicate it to find the meaning in addition. A bit is a unit of meaning like a pixel. With small amounts of byte like now the resolution is low so you can't see as much and this is essentially the problem of compatibility. The secretary is completely compatible with your assumptions to move the box of paper from one side of the room to the other and you both have more than enough computing power to solve the problems and you know you're a brain. So to make the web of tomorrow reachable from today's web to upgrade it would be sort of like moving files from an old digital Hitachi to a zoom of higher resolution, retaining all the old with more of the new. This is like reading the basic information of the old code and copying it, not the same as knowing its meaning, this would take another kind of code to translate it. Incompatability is a sort of smoothing problem. Finally all the code would be uploaded to the all new giant web box and most of worth would be to make the web of 50 years ahead of super simple chips like the molecular crossbar chips that are sort of like a wire mesh weave that's so simple and fast it would be a simple foundation chip of all the machines after it.
If you sail around in an old plane almost as good as a brainstorm is where at least your instruments aren't bad, so you can know where you put your photo of your wife Betsy, and your set of wheels (how to see them when you just have a Yugo in your Mac?). If the instruments don't work, you could at least learn to compensate for this if you had more instruments that would say in plain talk what was really going on and what it thinks your options are. The computer wouldn't be able to say what was going on the way they are, so some use a plug in box that reads all the machine's typing. Suppose like me the other day, you upload a program and while loading it says, "Deleting Backup Files". This could be cause for edginess, even perhaps making me climb up to reach the 98 jugs of fizz on the wall. My answers if after 5:30 are; Are files of this sort backup files like in My Computer? What are my options? What's my area code? How can I rewind? This would be help that was actually help if the machine would say what was up.
In life, like rhetoric, so much is about the proof of what is claimed. "If a them b". Like the thought, the straight line and the punch line in humor, it's what much of life is about. With computer stuff like this claims are offered, often claims that may be harmful, if not with no proof whatsoever. Without proof what is learned is not of as much worth, it won't reboot my readme. Many of the plug in help boxes will use speech recognition, it would be where you ask it questions like the above and it would say in common speech where the mountain was your airship zoomed past on your visit to BC powers last month, and what you would learn, a sort of way to be wise about your machine based on solving useful problems, so you're smarter and smarter about the machine itself by use so you'll know what's up when the airship of life is. This would make it so a lot more people would be able to be sharp about how computers are, not just the use. It saves on repairs too because you'd be more exalted by your 1,000,000 clicks. I was the 1 millionth visitor the other day, and they said thanks!
The top software hits of all time are the internet and email. While some like Popular Science say the next big hits may be desktop search or WiFi, I doubt these are the enlightened. Desktop search is already achieved by just a simple A-Z like My Docs, and WiFi is just sort of wireless radio. Help of real valor however would solve much. I've read where they think computers may heal themselves, I think this may be more like hoping for 747's or F14's while living in the 1920's. Not impossible but far enough in the future because of incompatiblity and so on to be not as worthwhile as just improving what we have, then this would be more viable about health. Real information would make software like visual software of use to more because I had no way to know what it was- I even read the complete software in the ancient CBS!
These aid modules of science and spinoff .orgs of college may be of worth for computers in automobiles because the computer wouldn't be making unproven assumptions while the driver would be in that show "In the year 2000, in 1978" saving many lives.
Another type of incompatability problem is about hardware. They're having problems reading old software codes. If there are lots of machines that crash or are unable to cyber up the other machine's Coors Lite code, how may a 2007 machine read one vintage 1985, or, if time machines and collectable GPS road maps are what some like to save, how may an old machine read the web? The ultimate resolution may be an idea of Einstein's. Einstein believed if you have a lower power beam like the light with the sofa you could measure a subatomic particle without changing or destroying the information it contains. This is via a penetrating matter wave beam that more recent experiments seem to once more prove Einstein to be a genius, you've always suspected he may know just why you are so wise!
If the information of say a drive were limited by the similar energy of the measurer and the hoped for measure, the information would be only retrievable by more conventional methods like hard drive healers in clean rooms to revive the computers lost in fire, flood, or heat waves at the business celebration when your secretary sat on the copy machine, so all her memos memos say Levis!
But with a low energy beam just one sweep of the sensor could find and store all the information of a machine including all that's in the chips, the hard drive, even the power wires. This would be the ultimate resolution of all hardware compatability issues without having to open the machine if there is any way to refind the data, because from the information retrieved by the low power probe, a virtual simulation of the old or crashed computer of any sort would be used. This would "start up" the down machine, refind all the lost information by simulation of the entire machine or as much as can be, and even make the code compatible with a new machine. It would be a sort of super copy machine like the scanning part of a teleportation machine without building up the mass at the other machine. It could even be used for archeology and to copy pages in a satchel and old books or records. This Wikipedia Link is of the belief that as it's become more sure that teleportaton is viable, no reason has been found to believe it's impossible and more reason to believe in this sort of machine.
They find that when a driver is in the cell wire zone they don't move their eyes much, but when they are just in route without gossip their eyes move around the windshield, so one good motif that's been invented so perhaps so cell conversation is safer is a use of heads up displays. While the driver talks if danger is possible, the windshield would highlight where to look with color coded light, more where it was of most import. While they have rollover safety systems like this for semis, this is another use of heads up.
.
