A Large Scale Plan For Drought Silt and Flooding

An interesting link for you about

The Environmental Disaster Of China

Here it is almost summer, and no rain! With changes in the weather, drought may be continual before it stops!

As you see on the above site, flooding and silt are a major problem in china and the rest of the world. A plan in the US to create underground reservoirs by use of atomic blasts was tried in the 1960's. It was found to be unfeasible because of radiation on the rocks of the large spherical rooms created by the blast. In the picture of the room you see a brave science volunteer standing on the level rock inside the room where the rock fell after the blast from the roof. The problem that made this unviable was about the radioactivity in the rocks after the blast, so the plan was discontinued. How to solve the radioactivity? This may have been solved recently by way of the motif of reverse beta decay familiar to physics students. Beta decay is when a radioactive neutron emits an electron and expanding outward, becomes a proton. The solution to radioactivity may be by reversing this process. First the radioactive atomic nuclei inside the atoms would be spin aligned by a strong external magnetic field like MRI so the nuclei are polarized. Next an electron would be injected into the nucleus by way of the polarized field, which overcomes the otherwise repulsive external field. The electrons would combine with the protons of the nuclei converting them to neutrons in reverse beta decay. With two neutrons (which don't attract by the strong force) where there was a proton and a neutron before (which do) the bond of the strong force would be cut and the extra neutron would move outward from the otherwise radioactive nucleus, and this would decay in just a few minutes compared to millions of years for some radioactive metabolites. Complete Explanation.

This short term radioactivity would be used as a power source with collection plates to collect the thermal motion and it would be source of hydrogen for more power (protons and electrons from the external radioactivity).

Thus the idea of reservoirs by atomic blasts may be feasible. After the blast a machine with robots would be sent down to clean up the rock and convert it to hydrogen and power.

Beyond this large pipes could be laid to large rivers for water from the rivers especially when there was a flood. The flood water would be pumped into inter modal freight containers where the silt would settle, then the water would be siphoned off the top into the conduit to the reservoir, blasted down somewhat deep so when the water would fall it would also power hydroelectric generators. Ideally the reservoirs would be at lower elevation for power but not too deep compared to the land just above so the clean water would be pumped to the surface without high cost.

The silt in the inter modal containers would fill perhaps half of each for optimal shipping, or what would be optimal, this would be shipped either in barges upstream to the farmers or by road or rail, and sold to the farmers to reclaim the land. To make this economic, power from the fast radiation of the rocks in the reservoir (atomic power, like having a big atomic power plant) would be used to pay for much of the the filtering, pumping and transport cost if the power is stored in capacitors or other storage.

The siphoning off of the flood water to the reservoirs may thus be a way to save large areas from drought, save the land from the problem of silt and reduce flooding, and a source of electric power, in other words, all the advantages of hydroelectric power and more, without the darnation.

Hydroelectric power has the disadvantage of risk of dam failure as on the link about china, where 700,000 died when a dam broke in china, loss of silt to the land by erosion and more damage to the ecology than this plan.

The site says the chinese government covered up the disaster. I don't know if this would be so without the rest of the world finding out by satellite, but perhaps there weren't so many satellites then.

__

Storms like cyclones or other storms of the tropics have ionization from the ocean to the top of the eyewall. If a typhoon was about to hit land and there were no other way of control, by finding some way of reducing the electric component this might be good to reduce the severity of the storm. Perhaps beams above and below could push the ions to unify them and reduce the storm, the beams would be of transparent to most of the storm but would interact more strongly with the ions.
.
Ultimately, the best way to control tropical storms may be using heaters in ships, or heating beams from planes that would heat the ocean on a path ahead or to one side of the cyclone since they are heat powered. They just have one eye so they see just via myopic vision just the ocean ahead, so to control the path of heat flow could be a way also to save many lives and property damage (when you go to a concert, the lights in the air improve the sound of the shouts, we hope.). A hurricane generates about an H bombs worth of rain per second, so a heat path may be of more control than the plan about combining ions above because for the heat path the general spin of the storm cancels out on both sides, so it cancels overall. Thus like power steering of your automobile, it may take a smaller force to move it. Cooling paths may be of use, or cooling and heating paths side by side.

Another possible way to make a heat path is by towing icebergs from the N or S and propelling them into one side of the storm, by the instability caused by the iceberg on one side and the rotation, the overall motion of the storm would be headed towards where the iceberg was aimed into the storm. The ice would break up by the action of the waves and would cool the storm, also reducing it's intensity. If an icebergs speed overall were 20 knots, it would take about a week to reach the storm, usually before it would reach land. For hurricanes missed by slower machines if this is viable till more robust machines were built it would make a good source of fresh water, as in other plans to move the icebergs to the tropics like the sahara.

-

Hurricanes are powered by the inner implosion of heat of the ocean, like a giant bubble heat then rises up from the eye and out at the top via centrifugal force. The rising heat is why the storms generally move north. The inflow and and the upward air current powered by heat is below 10,000 feet so conceviably the implosion could move the iceburg in where it would stop heat flow up from the eye, by closing the flow of heat upward. If the storm breaks up most icebergs and this was of worth by weather experiments, to go to the eye, the iceberg may actually be covered with a sort of cover till it reaches the eye or after if it were of value. Because the iceberg is stable the cover could be kept on for more attempts at moving the iceberg into the storm to move it by reaction and for more predictable ways to reduce the heat, if this is the better plan. For how all the plans could be proven or disproven for worth by physics before real money was spent, click here.

A recent patent on a machine that takes a ship into the calm center of the storm and then uses a cooling jet of water from below is small compared to the size of a hurricane, if the jet or combinations of jets were 50 feet across this is about 1 100th of a mile x the average width of a storm of 400 miles, or just 1/40,000th of the width of the storm, and this is just the width not height. The water jet would lose lots of it's cool fast in just a few 100 or a 1000 feet of upward motion with the rising heat. An iceberg could be 100 miles in depth and width and may have much more influence, it's 1/4th or 1/3 the width of the storm if necessary, and it's much cooler than the warmer water of the ship, to build a ship with as much influence would cost much more.

When the iceberg would reach the center, because of all the implosion all around, it would stay stabilized, perhaps stopping the overall motion of the storm till it was completely calm.

This idea of moving the icebergs from the poles might even be of use if the plan of using magnetic bubbles to heat the earth if too hot or cool the world it if was too hot in an ice age or with more solar heat and so on, turns out to be nonviable, for overheating of the earth, at any rate. If an ice age comes with people unable to move across national borders like in ages before where they would just walk south it would cause untold misery and suffering. If another ice age came about, not inconcievabl the icebergs could be moved from the poles and melted at the tropics and used for a major source of fresh water. This might be enough to reduce the albedo of the ice and make change enough to revive the earth from this woeful bane (much slower than broadband. I was thinking of low speed web with my ISP, my broadband is so broad the cheap site wouldn't load!).

For weather control on land, use of ionizing beams may be of worth to squeeze more rain out of clouds in a drought, reduce rain in a deluge, or even to prime the pump so much all the rain in a storm would fall where it wouldn't without use of particle or laser beams, especially when combined with methods of causing rain like dropping chemicals which cause rain on the storm from above. Clouds have opposite charges high and low. If more power is applied or power is reduced of the charges the actual probability of rain would be made more or reduced. While you may say that while rain is often with electrical activity in a storm, and that heat and electrical activity are not the same, they're close enough that this may be worth trying, because electricity carries heat. A storm has a lot of power, and power is heat. While this would be just about converting the beam power to heat and rain power, which is easily calculated, it wouldn't be cheap so could only be used over small areas like cities. If it also primes the pump it could be used to pay for itself with hydroelectric power perhaps, or relief from drought. (How dry is Miami beach, the water by the beach is always moist!) This may turn out to be a more viable way to achieve lots of rain than the machines they now have that extract water from the air, because if it's often not raining even if the humidity is 300% where I live! There's a lot more rain power in storms than air has.

More Weather Control From Encyclopedia Comp;
. .

Sounds like a commercial for undertakers! You get in the subway, and it's a mausaleum! ATHENS, Greece - Greek workers discovered around 1,000 graves, some filled with ancient treasures, while excavating for a subway system in the historic city of Thessaloniki, the state archaeological authority said Monday.

Last updated March 10 2008 well, actually 200 BC!
.
.

SWIMMER'S HUMOR

..

SWIM HUMOR Is MOIST The MARIA-ER ROOM WHEN The HEAT Outside is 95!

____

"IF H2O Is THE COSMIC SOLVENT JUST THE ROOM BETWEEN THE STARS IS UNDISSOLVED!"

They have these in room swiming pools with a wave machine so the water moves and the room is stationary. But if they stop swimming in the tub they never go down the drain thanks to a convienient on off option!
...
A fierce gust of wind knocked Mike Luise's car into a river near Rome, Italy, in 1983. He managed to break a window, climb out and swim to shore -- where a tree blew over and killed him. His family sued the owner of the S&L in the village where he lived because he had wind, flood, automobile, and life and limb insurance!
.
The Titanic was the first ocean liner to have a swimmimg pool and a gym, wish my swimming pool had more life boats in the summer and more radar, and a blonde bombshell in the ship to blast our way to shore wouldn't be so bad either!
.
If a woman has blonde hair that goes eco from swimming pool chlorine, when she puts ketchup on it balances the hues well, and her red and green hair is why I'm dreaming of a blonde Christmas!

.
Captain Matthew Webb of England was the first to swim the English Channel using swimming moves invented by Benjamin Franklin. Franklin didn't actually swim the ocean of the channel, the ocean was stretched out between the US and England following 1776.

.

_________________

.

Add a Room to A Swimming Pool, Your Web Page's Worth Goes Up...

.

A swimming pool in the living room with the baseboard watertight may be of real worth. Raise and lower the furniture to the roof with a machine and add water in and out from a tank. The floor's always clean always shines up! cleans up! cheers up! and never cleans down!

.

An outdoor air filled swimming pool with inflatable roof- so you can go for a swim in the rain!

A swimming pool in the basement. Thanks to my landlady, mine already is!

.

A swimming pool on the roof, the roof of the world will never leak, and your boat/ plane/van will always have a lot with a view of the beach!

>

LAW OF INERTIA FOR SWIMMERS

A swimmer at rest will remain in motion, except when acted upon by an outside force, like a sighting of Victoria Principle in her exercise hour!

*********

More Comic/Cultural Links...

Q W E K L T

--.

If Energy Is Conserved, What Causes Motion?

Mathematician E. Burger of Williams College says, "A satisfying sharp, definite definition of number is unavailable to us." And Einstein said in his famous comment, "God does not play dice with the cosmos." While we often read about how the latest evidence in subatomic physics is hoped to be used to prove or disprove that the universe is causal or not, I think it's actually more nondeterministic than causal, because Einstein's assumption of no subatomic foaminess has the problem of the outward expansion of entropy because foam expands via its internal motion. The problem with quantum foaminess would be that the cosmos would expand outward forever, violating energy conservation with power radiated outward and lost to the rest of the universe. On the other hand foamy waves of inward implosion (like gravity in my formulation) may be of worth to physics. I think because gravity may be the foundation force from which all is energised and gravity with all observations is only implosive, this would mean that mostly gravity is a continuous wave to unify seperate points. All other forces would be derived from this basic low powered field, with each higher force derived from the force below it (like in the hierarchy of the conservation laws in subatomic physics, going from lower energy like electric charges to higher more is conserved while all is conserved from the field or fields below it). Since all would be ultimately derived from the foundation force, this explains energy conservation and other motifs like the uniformity of nature because all would be derived from this field. While gravity would be a wave, I think it will also be somewhat discontinuous, since if it's the foundation force, the solid discontinuity of other forces must come from somewhere, and so would be derived from this basic field (which predicts that in experiments or observations like high energy astronomy, gravity would shield somewhat). The implosion of gravity would mean it's unifying, in other words it's continuous more than not, this is why I think it's wavelike (actually I think would be many overlapping continuously changing waves to cause the continuous acceleration).

.As I say on the link about "what's the smallest size of the cosmos?" I think the assumption that the cosmos is fundamentally discontinuous leads to contradictions not found in the assumption that waves are more fundamental. One problem about discontinuous building blocks is that there must be a smallest limit of discontinuity because all around us would be infinite divisability and complexity from it and this is not seen. So while therefore a smallest particle must exist, if an ultimate building block of the cosmos exists it must be divisable to explain all the change and life around us from this building block. But if it's divisable it must not be the smallest and so on ad finitum to an infinite implosion of wheels in wheels, that would have infinite mass, disproven by experiment. So there must both be a smallest limit to explain change and no limit because an ultimate particle is indivisable, unable to change, but all energy is change. Contradiction is, after all, what discontinuity is about.

Waves, on the other hand, being continuous don't have this type of contradiction. The foundation field if made of waves could have almost complete continuity down to zero size and outward, meeting no resistance as it would flow between the interstices of the other subatomic motes (like the Higgs, an elementary mote theorized by a physicist named Higgs about 40 years ago), this would be why gravity never wears out or runs down.
.
Because energy conservation says that energy can neither be created or destroyed, my belief is that the expansion of Big Bang cosmology is not all the cosmos is about. I believe the cosmos can't be pulled out of a hat. Unlimited expansion would violate energy conservation. In my cosmology like with the usual matter and energy around us the expansion is not the entire physics, I think it may be just a regional expansion limited in our realm of the cosmos. Others and myself believe may be there may be worth in a cosmology that uses loops of flow of the mass and energy, like the magnetic field of the earth, out from the N and S poles and in at the outer wheel of the cosmos, closing the loop so no mass or energy is lost over infinite time. (This explanation has the advantage that the closed loop allows local expansion at the poles without violation of energy conservation. Gravity would be the perpetual motion prime mover that would wind it up continuously. Click Here for my complete explanation of the many conundrums and possible explanations based on older and new evidence for them via my version of cosmology. Since gravity holds the cosmos together so energy wouldn't be being radiated out and lost to energy conservation, the implosion and gravity's wavelike foundation would in general be of more worth to the cosmos than discontinuity.

.
. I believe discontinuity may be derived from waves by way of implosion creating pressure to resist the implosion at shorter range like the solar gravity inward and then it's heating expansion outward (so there's not infinite implosion that would also violate energy conservation) via another wavelength, but not waves like gravity (that attract and adhere) from discontinuity. You can more easily make higher energy divisable particles out of mostly indivisable waves, by compression of the waves like gravity, but to make low energy indivisable waves out of divisable particles is more improbable, because the general flow of the field is more from the general foundation of gravity to the higher energy fields, and this general flow of gravitational entropy in and electromagnetic entropy out is not symmetrical because gravity, being the foundation force would be more basic to the cosmos. All forces communicate with gravity, the other forces are not always conversant in the same language. If there were no waves that unify the discontinuous elements, the particles would move in more and more linear motion and expand without limit, so waves actually are necessary for particles to be created and sustained but not vice versa.

. It's been well proven and easy to prove (e.g. in subatomic physics) that all there is in the cosmos is based on symmetries, what changes and what stays the same. It's impossible to imagine a world were all was one in a big fuzzy blob because there would be no change and all the world and all life around us is in constant change, nor the opposite; a world were just 100% random change like the random hen's tracks of subatomic physics it would be inconcievable too because this would be too much change to find coherence. So all there is would have both the change and what remains the same, and all sets are structured (at the least) by this motif. This is where our most worthwhile definition of number would be derived from, more waves and (some) discontinuity, 25 fitness rooms are more than 24, while the price of yoga exercises are the same.

. Since number is derived more from the waves than discontinuity, if waves are more the important field and discontinuous particles of subatomic or more physics are created out of foamy waves this would be disproof of an absolute definition of number. Waves are in continuous change we couldn't live without.. If the definition of number was too sharp and absolute there would be no change. Like science and life better uses of numbers may be found without limit in sight, but life or science is ultimately a mystery. We accept what science is, and how gravity works may be achieved via more science, but not necessarily why. Foundations of math like number are the cause of all there is. So we may find of the elements of the cosmos in general are waves, but we may never actually go beyond this level.

That the motif is so all encompassing would explain why this idea of number as symmetries is of value, so it would have no absolute definition, there will always be more uses but no more definitions. The method of science has stayed the same since it's invention, and it may always stay the same

A problem is about creation not just maintenence of the field by the constant labor of the field. If the foundation field created itself, it would have violated energy conservation, one of the most well proven beliefs in physics. Energy conservation is via symmetries like action reaction pairs to balance the energy, and it's based on a balance between balance (like the opposite electric charges lifting us up) and imbalance (of gravity pulling us down) the many and the one, like science itself with a simple part like experiment, and a more complex part like theory or explanation. So it would seem any major disproof of energy conservation like gravity's creation would be essentially disproof of science, and so I think there was never a day when god said, here's nothing, I think I'll create this field. How could he have, even if there were a way, no explanation exists about why the field chose to implode just to where the electric field would then rebound and from the energised field the other complex forces were created (although if this is accepted, the events where in subatomic the same particles are made of the same amount of mass each time and most of the complexity would be explained via being built out of the basic field's implosion to make the particles that then would make the rest of the fields in a generally unchanging way once the initial implosion and expansion of the basic field and outward heat are accepted as the foundation. The implosion and expanson are unchanging their balance would be are the cause of each particle's mass and the more general balance would be axiomatic). We know from eclipses gravity has no delay and in all observations never wears out or runs down but this is perpetual motion. If entropy is winding down as the universe's electromagnetic clock expands outward over time, shielding of electromagnetism, and most of what we see would be derived from waves and perpetual motion, exactly how may eventually be found in the matter waves of subatomic physics. The assumption of the existence of these waves make quantum electrodynamics the most well proven theory in the history of science in terms of the numbers to 50 decimals like the derivation of the charge and mass of the electron. Gravity changes relative to other forces via these waves. I think these are indeed waves of non electrical or other mass, they are pure mass. The field is lower in power than the electric field but higher than the basic gravity wave field. If these waves are the main component of the gravitational field (they're stronger and more dense so may have the most flex of this component of the field) and the gravitation implodes to create the other fields by way of the mediation of this field, changes in the matter wave field as it implodes may tell us much of worth about shielding, entropy, and how the basic field would energise up via fields made of it at intermediate energies that would create all the rest, sort of like moving a river upstream to improve the land downstream via shields.

I disagree with Einstein about these fields being just empty space because for example

securing three masses on a boom and spinning them up in the air moves the center of mass without change of radius they rotate about in the so called empty space, which is well explained by the small masses making a definite change in the field. If there were nothing there, nothing times nothing is nothing, so changing or moving the masses wouldn't change it. And just by moving a mass the field is also changed to follow it. See also antigravity on my Physics Synopses page for a possible way to change the field or shield via centrifugal force, which, e.g. makes us weigh more in Alaska than in the West Indies via the cancellation of the field. Click Here for possible ways to make gravity wave lenses using proton solids and how to generate gravity waves.

If gravity is perpetual motion and continually winding up the entropy as it winds down electrically over infinite time as the 2nd Law, with energy created locally but neither created or destroyed overall, the gravity always creating more energy would be infinite. The field is finite in space and infinite in time with the gravity in continual implosion, like the mass energy of the earth. The question of why may also eventually be answered by the shielding motifs and seeing how the field changes as we go upstream. We might have five types of physics inside these small bubbles of modified field, each for a special use, one for electronics, one for power and one for life science.

.

THE TENDANCY OF THE THEOREM OF TIME AS WAVES TO BE UNVIABLE

All time is known in higher physics to be measured by periodic fluxuation and it's also an acceleration, both are about spin. The particles of subatomic physics in my physics would be like small spinning clocks, marking out the hours by way of the regular rotation, one rotation is one complete time unit.

Time is known in higher math to be about accleration and nonlinear and the more linear the motion is, reduced mass is present and the larger the volume of space. It's impossible for a line to be both linear and round at one time, so if time is about acceleration the opposite of time is space. Space is more about waves with larger size and more wavelength and time is more about particles. As I say above I think waves are more fundamental to the general frame of physics with gravity we would have to have both waves and particles to make our world. So continuous waves are good for fields and more elementary, and discontinuous building blocks of the cosmos would cause time where the field is more solid.

It's another well known theorem about time that the measure of time in a system is proportional to frequency. While this would be just a measure of how fast each particle spins, if waves are not the same as particles and time is mostly measured by particles, a prediction of this explanation of what time is about is that while this theorem about frequency would work well with particles and makes viable derivations it would generally not describe time well for waves, because they are more complex and nonperiodic, they move fast and change more. The experiments to prove time as frequency would work well for particles, but for bigger and bigger low energy waves the theorem that time is about frequency would fail. While not precise, if the frequency is slowed time would also be seen as stopped, this would be how gravity is the source of the perpetual motion all around us, it would be a sort of eternal power source. If it changed ever it would run out of time. Thermodynamics is the source of the time flowing around us more than gravity, our savvy about time in our bodies and our world is almost totally thermodynamic and it's the information we've evolved in most of what our idea of time is.

.
Waves measure space with more fecility because the distance from here to say Alpha Centuari is constant. There are few particles in the space between us and more distant realms. It's much easier to just send waves from point A to point B than to line up a wire made of particles all the way from here to a distant realm of the cosmos (but my mom would always roll up the shade of my starship when I was outside at 12 at night!). Electromagnetic waves tend to expand out via entropy but since the distance remains mostly constant, with few particles, constant distances with time would be explained with overlapping waves with cohesion like gravity (attraction) balanced with the electromagnetic field (entropy, or the tendancy to expand). These are the only long range forces present between the here and a distant star. The distance measured would be constant via a resonation of opposite waves.

Locally, discontinuity and waves are not the same. If space and time were the same as in Relativity when you have a continuous sliding scale, with higher speed motion through space you have reduced motion through time and this would be expected by conservation of momentum, with increased linear momentum you have reduced angular momentum of the time, both are momentem, more of the one less of the other. The particles of Einstein's starship would be like helixes that would stretch out with more motion through space at higher speed, slowing the rate of frequency relative to the observer at rest of each small clock as the line is more stretched out because the motion through space is redshifted, so what's lost by the spin is won by the linear motion of the redshift, a simple mechanical explanation of what goes on at near the speed of light based on conservation of linear and angular momentum and the field not being empty like via Einstein. If time were the same as the field of waves and have the 0 speed through time at the speed of light and a sliding scale is used to unify space and time via relativity, when you slow down from the speed of light to rest, you would have the opposite because high and low speed are opposite. If you have a 0 rate of time at the speed of light, if you slow to rest, you would have infinite speed of time (I use this hour of my month saved to sign up for fizz on the www) so since they aren't this would be disproof of the general idea that space and time are the same.

Space and time are the same generally as an exact ratio of linear and angular momentum, but locally they aren't, and both change and lack of change are of worth. To heat lunch who uses a blendor?!

Particles aren't the same as waves because you can't have both at the same place and time at one time and this is what I think Einstein's explanation lacks. The efficiency couldn't be improved if mass and energy or space and time were the same because they would be exactly the same and equal. Solar mass and energy e.g. would convert instantly instead of billions of years. I explain life via hot socks!

.

WHY REVERSED SPIN IS NOT REVERSED TIME

If time is caused by particles spinning like small watches, it would seem that if you just reversed all the spins you could reverse time. Time reversal has not been found to be a property of subatomic physics and this would be because of time as frequency being more common with particles than waves. You can have the spins of particles rewinding after a collision as Feynmann (the nobel prize laureate) believed, but the reason "time reversal" is actually seen to be just for a while after the subatomic impact of two subatomic particles would be even while they are simple, the waves they would plough through at more distance would be more complex, and not of use to actually reverse time. Complexity isn't as easy to reverse as simplicity, because there's more of it. Because the theorem that time is frequency would apply to all waves or particles both since both waves and particles have this property, time reversal if so would be possible in all of subatomic physics, not just mostly about particles. If it were about both waves and discontinuity, time reversal would be possible and like mass and energy, space and time would be the same in all respects. Even though time would be about angular momentum, while you may say if you spin around to the sound of the AM/FM is disproof of this about time and spin, you're not rewinding to months of another era of 1979 BC, because you're not a giant simple particle. You're many, and complex, plowing into complex waves. And you've just spun around once, your electrons and protons have spun many more times in the moment than your one rotation. Only at comparable speeds of rotation would you influence the mostly electromagnetic cause of time. Other types of spin like the spin of the proton's strong force or lower power fields are not in our usual concious awareness even if they are about angular momentum and time because they spin at other rates so much they have had reduced influence on the evolution of our ideas about time. If we evolved as a living star system, and were living on a large scale of distance we might think of gravity and our worlds as having the cause of another sort conciousness about time. For example, a planet moving counterclockwise looks much the same in a film rewound than in foreward clockwise motion of the cinema.

More About Mass Energy Conversion

.

I saw this ad, " If you scrub and scrub your tub and is it still not clean buy our tub liners and we'll clamp them over your tub and you'll have a like shiny tub in just a bit." If the price was so rich instead of taking a nap I'd just buy another clamp on bed each time I go to sleep, with another village and ye old country with each yawn! (I like to eat out in Baked Alaska in a heat wave.) I wonder if anyone has invented clamp on teeth one wears over usual teeth to munch some dish with more chomp. Turns my mouth into a power blendor! What's a soap TV dinner? When you sit and watch a hot dish you eat!

SIGN LANGUAGE WINS WORLD BOXING S & H CELEBRATION MARATHON
Some TV remotes are powered by sensing like sign language. They wave and the TV is www famous! With this no one would lose the remote, No charge. They "sign" a box to start the TV. "R" to record or make a V or an upside down V to go to higher and lower stations, and so on. I've read where they have outfits you just zip tight and inflate with warm air, this irons them in about a minute. If they'll have outfits you wear in the hot weather with the seal and a fan that automatically would blow cool air over you, they'd be the world's highest paid World Champion Wrestler, if they threw the wearer of this shirt down they'd rebound! If the world's a waterbed they have wave powered boats that move across the ocean about 1/3 the speed of conventional boats but with huge savings in power plus no pollution (many ocean ships consume 1000 gallons of oil a minute). And they may have devised fans powered by automobiles above the road. Or what I'd like to see is a starship powered by radio stars, saving tuneups of the rocket motor! Thanks to cyber engineering computerized saws are moving from the assembly line to the workshop. You give the wood and information and the machine senses the wood and asks you what you think. If the wood's cut and saves my typing skills, I use what I saved to count the money more often! While we'll see the stars when we look up we'll never saw most of the chemicals in the cosmos. Some hens drive 18 wheelers, this is why the hens cross the road, to reach the other heavier weigh in station of power! They now have automobiles that train the driver while they drive. A good velodrome simulator would be a way to save many lives. Or a volleyball simulator has been devised to win the world cup with. You would find enough field room to make all your brilliant winning moves, put on the hat and gloves, and go. All the look of the field, the net, and the other players is in the heads up so you can practice the same great standardized moves, then randomized combinations of these most brilliant moves, and so on.

A TV antenna built into Venetian blinds is in the pipeline. All your fans up the road will think you're 150 stations!


They now have battery operated weed trimmers with the power of the conventional gas machines of this sort, a transmission with a good reduction ratio makes the torque high, this may be of worth to use with electric bike technology. And much easier than riding a unicycle on a power wire! And we'll be safer vis a vis the world wide net sometimes if like me you have the realization the most ill causing occupation of all is not firemen, or even a painter. The most toxic occupation is IT, like computers. Computers give off a lot of radiation and they continually emit Mercury. A possible solution they've thought of would be a sort of clip on laser beam light show you would clip on your keyboard and it would intercept the radiation. One way I used to prove that the monitor was radiant was by a wokman between me and the computer. At some wavelengths there was a hum, but this may not measure the more hazardous heat. Millions of Americans may be... Like me!.. the new super hero- Thyroid Man! (If you're weary the good news is for the one fourth of americans that have low thyroid, herbs are good for this. But this is not stopping the radiation itself. Please see my disclaimer.) Till then if you use the computer a lot you may want to use the exact same speech recognition software I'm using to type with now because it's several feet to the computer from the microphone via the wire. Click Here for More About Speech Recognition Software, Computer Overuse Solutions and Why we're all at risk. (A computer reinforces overuse behaviour like gambling because of the randomness.) Computers are causing lots of divorces. Some sort of mercury sponge or shield, spray on or otherwise may be of worth (otherwise computer makers may be at risk for the "bad luck and randomness of lawsuits"). I'm considering putting my computer in a box and turning it on and off perhaps with an in wire remote. Being a boxing hero of the world is easier then bonking myself on the head with a computer, information is more uplifting! Vaughn's S2 Hammer is a new hammer that has a more shock absorbing handle so it saves your arm after hours of hammering. I wonder if they'll have smart hammers that are computerized so when you hammer it automatically minimizes the shock while maximizing the impact. Eventually I believe they may have a hammer that you just wham in the general area of the nail, and it saves your arm and also always hits the nail by way of sideways motion and without harm. Another good way has been devised to maximize use of more operation control by a glove with electric heat and cool that automatically adjusts to many chores, it has one setting for the hoe, one for the hammer, one for the hoover, and "saw on"! It may even brake against your shoulder with power to the nail via a motor so the arm has much reduced load. Or better yet, a silent hammer has been devised that uses noise cancellation to solve insomnia! It's been said fish don't sleep, but when the moon goes over they swim higher! The Seabreacher is a new type of PWC that swims and looks much like a fish, and goes under the water and then leaps above the surface, then into the water, and above. Talk about a finmobile, it's said to be, "The fastest submersable anywhere". It costs 70,000$ like a monster truck, (a small, tiny monster, who isn't brave) and has a 250 hp motor. It can just stay under the water thirty seconds max, and no more than a few feet under because it draws a limited amount of air through a tube/fin. This may be improved by use of a simple compressor to inhale and compress more air with each leap above the waves.
They say wind power science is bad for tourism because it ruins the view. This month's Popular Science (march 08) says they may use a giant sail to make the vision smoother in a valley out west to collect more of the power by funneling it to turbines in the sail, and another plan to use fans on booms above superhighways to harness the power used by road vehicles, if the wind speed is 10 mph created by the Mazda's, Chevy's and other vans, each fan would produce enough power to power a house. And the Selsam Superturbine is a sort of fan that sails offshore, and moves a bit in the wind. Air is well known to be ionized by electricity, storms do this all the time. So a better solution has been devised, a fan that uses loops of magnetic field arched from two land or even water sources, shielded at the base so the field is all above ground. The wind blows through the loops, generating more power than is put in the fields like with a giant fan, the field itself may also be a giant solar collector so no power is needed to collect both the wind and solar heat. And the field is a lens to focus more of the heat yet to turbines where the rays passing through the field meets. I think it may even be possible to make the field lines stationary to slow or stop wind when needed, good for airports (most crashes happen at takeoff or landing, especially good for derigables) or to melt snow over cities if there was too much (Some snow is good for the plants however). Another use of magnetic bubbles may be for sail power of boats. The fastest anyone had traveled relative to the earth in 1900 or so was about 120 miles per hour on ice yatchts, even though the wind powering the sails was just 50 mph, with sail it multiplies up the power. Thus large magnetic solar power sails may be used on ships. And if by concentration of the beam it reached up to the jet stream, the ship could go at much higher speed in another direction than the wind at the surface, an option conventional sail power doesn't actually have. While it would take power to maintain the sail at least on overcast days or nights, so does the power of a ships engine, perhaps with physics like solitons where the waves internal cohesive forces are used to hold it together by adjusting the wavelength relative to the speed, the cost of maintaining magnetic bubbles may be much reduced (solitons are why long distance calls are cheap, the wave of the light in the wire doesn't lose power in the optic fibers. Talk is rich!). Another use of magnetic bubbles may be in weather control of the earth as a unit with a field between the earth and the sun to focus the radiation, cooling and heating earth. .

.

How Some Inventors Say We Won't Lose Moisture In the Desert While Winning The Superhighway Competition

Dale Ernhart is using a cooling suit that also stops fire (a real cooling suit always will!). The cloth will have an inner layer that will allow better air circulation than conventional suits, drawing heat and moisture away. Conventional suits have a quilted layer of cloth that stops fire but that also causes dehydration, this causes drivers to lose 12 pounds of water and some drivers to be confused or with slower reflexes by the brain's loss of computing power to win the competition. Who says surfing the web and reading won't make you a genius!

When it's hot the wind blows when you have perspired, wouldn't it be nice to have that high level of cooling power? One invention uses the bodies own moisture not to wick away and promote heating (works well to stay warm in winter!) but rather for cooling. Somewhat like the inventor of hook and loop, who went outdoors and got burrs, reminding him of hook and loop the inventor of this cooling motif was trying to devise a way to stay warm by using layers of thin plastic around his socks outdoors in winter, but sometimes his feet would overheat even with much moisture held inside the sock. So to be cool he took off his shoes with the layer of thin plastic and moisture inside, with dramatic cooling. It just took about 20 seconds to cool most of the feet compared to 10 minutes with just dry socks. In the scorching heat most always sense the depth of water with both feet or jump in the pool without a wait! This motif of using the bodies own moisture could be used in a summer suit with an inner thin absorbing layer to not get too moist, a layer of thin waterproof plastic to seal the water in, and the usual outer fire proof layer. A fan blows air between the plastic layer and the fire proof layer, much cooling the driver. They have even devised one way pressure pumps that use some of the g forces the drivers must tolerate like in their legs with the vibration to continually pump air to the cooling layer without an external pump, a real actual airbag for feetwear. Dino and Wilma and Betty will celebrate! Unlike some cooling suits that use ice water or a coolant, this needs no heavy box of ice water to lift in the heat to be portable. Why not just pump air to the suit? Because water is much cooler than air, and the water is already just where evolution would find it of most worth to the wearer. For people who live in the desert this would have an inner waterproof layer and an outer airsealed layer with air pumped between both. If there were too much moisture on the skin with this sort of science it could be continually recycled with a small still or other machine perhaps solar powered, so almost no water would be lost in the heat while the wearer would be cool.
.
.

IX/ MORE COMICS

..

I believe life is about planting branches one may never get to see the fresh air of. It's more blessed to lend-then to send, this is from the branch of the S&L closest to mom!

.

Why does the dog woof when you unlock the door? It's trying out codes to find the number of the lock, the yip code so you're more in control!

-

Sir Issac Newton lived to be 90 and with all his own teeth. His electric toothbrush was physics powered, and he seemed just a usual teen without lots of inventions. They handed him a baseball's orbit to compute and he won the All Stars.

-

I have a computerized bathroom, I type in a memo on my website with my swim fins!

This site is been proven 100% without gallstones or fat, when I shop at the dish store I can eat a lot of thin without being fat!

"What are you doing with handstands and hugs, hugs of the boom box, the shelf, and the cushions, around the room?"

"It sez right here on the jug, Just flip and squeeze!"

-
I know a woman so smart, it says do not write below the line and she wrote, That's not my my family name, wherein my family name, it is authorised in the stars! Yours -- ******23!

"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep" "Half of 40 winks makes me see a 20-20 opthamamologists !"

What's a Merry Maids room look like? A sparkly clean washing machine and a dryer- to sleep she just powers up the heat and wakes up cozy!

-

If UFO's are so wise why haven't we been reached? So the History Station has an unlisted yellow page number so more business!!

My dog almost won a eating competition to see who could eat the most, he won this month because he ate all the memos they put up in the area to announce in advance.

Thanks to advances in dentistry saving your teeth is no sweat. You cant imagine what going round at 300,000 revolutions must have been like when the nurse was just learning to help us shout!

When I eat my lunch I remember when my mother would say, "Eat your mixed vegetables." To stop this I would pour the VeggAll in my milk glass. While the jug was transparent the milk was solid so Mom would only see the VeggAll if I stirred the milk. All went well till one day she said, "Good! You ate all your lunch. Now drink all your milk and wash it down!

Where are my mufflers? I can't say offhand!

There burying more and more people for a fee (often 5000) in urns on college campuses. They say "It's the dwelling place of our most precious memories, the college is ranked among the most beautiful and the country, the price will never go up, who wouldn't want to be buried here?" More of the living more often!

-
"Nothing important is worth doing wrong." Who said that? 20 Time World Cushion Wrestling Champ John Biff, 1987!"

"Optimists are nostalgic about the year 2040." And opthamologists are optimists about nobody finding out a wire frame is worth 75 not 200!

-

I see this woman at the store who's so cute if smartness were beauty she would put the web to shame, if her beauty was a magnet she could lift her weight in gold!

Living in the city's not as good as the country for vision....

"200 mpg"
"What would you do if your Mazda got 200 mpg?"
"I'd drive to the Shell Oil station."
"Where's that?" "See it's right over by the county limit 137 miles W of Honalulu!"

There's a simple way to make exercise fast cheap and easy, the Final Spin on the Wheel of Vanna when they all spin around!

The word in Spanish "viejo" sounds like "vehicle of the road" and it means "old" which reminds me,"Where does this road go?" "I've been here 2500 years and never seen it go anywhere yet!" This was an old joke updated in time for high resolution FM and the millenium!

Popular Science April 2008 says the army has a flying laser cannon. "Using its airplane base the cannon can melt a hole and a tank 5 mi. away and 10,000 ft. up at the speed of light with several targets in rapid succession." Their moto about this is see sharp and we'll be low-fat! This will burn a several inch wide hole in whatever it finds. Cheese slices have never been faster and more reliable if they can make more holes in the cheeze!

They have a pillcam, the Sayaka, that's 40 percent reduced more than conventional pill cams. It's when the doctors watching what the patients eat, sort of contemplating their zoOM.

They have a fitness machine that pumps water into the weights to add weight so you exercise as you warmup, better fitness sez Popular Science, "Pump Iron-and Water". And both won't even rust!

Some Bad News, Some may say pleasure in life is bad. The Good News if so is, you won't have to feel bad because of it!

What's A good way to learn CPR/lifesaving? Wear your blood pressure cuff on your sleeve!

...

images

___

More Comic Cultural Links

..

.............

Q W E R T

___

..

Fusion and History

How Will the Third and First World Will Be Changed In 10 Years if Fusion Physics Is Viable..

There are many who say that fusion power may be viable in just 10 years. It actually may be even sooner with research like focus fusion by Lerner, where a proton and hydrogen atom's opposite charges are used to to create fusion by the implosion of the electric field of the proton and atom that would then slam the proton and neutron of the hydrogen in a more dependable way with enough force to make them fuse. These and other plans such as my own ATOMIC MOTOR may realize the vast potential of safe atomic energy.


What would be the effect on the world economy? In principle because these machines could be made portable or large it would make all machines like common household appliances powered by electricity much stronger. But the change of the most major sort would probably be in production. Each production line would have more power, and this would make the price of almost all anyone could buy much cheaper. You may say, this is bad because for example if in chess or as in life, you don't favor an equal exchange of power, a piece for a piece, because the side with more power is taking away your fraction if you have less power so the side with less power is exchanged down to loss of the game, so this wouldn't be fair to the poor. But the good news would be that unlike an equal exchange of subtraction, there would be a proportional increase in wealth. If the poor person has a wealth of 1 and the rich person has 10 at the start, and then both rich and poor become 10 times richer, the poor person has 10 and the rich person has 100 but the relative ratio of the two is still one to ten! But the poor person is 10 times richer relative to the physics of biology and exercise shopping at the stores, and the rich person who already probably bought all there was at a certain level of wealth, if they haven't already become ill because of the wealth they probably never would, I never have been!
----

You may say if they have these fusion mills with cyber robots doing all that labor, it might seem good at first but all the strategic minerals will be used up much more rapidly, and the world would then be so depleted of resources it wouldn't be worth it. More good news! With more power all materials could be recycled and we'd never run out for a million years!

-
The possibility of a fusion would seem to change the world economy in another important way. With huge power giant machines could extract billions of tons of gold in suspension in the world's ocean water. Before fusion all plans to extract this gold have failed because the machines to make it viable were more expensive than the gold that would be reclaimed. This might seem to be like Spain in the years following the conquest of Mexico by the conquistadores. The gold so glutted Spain's economy it lost advantage with the rest of the world. I think it's not as simple as this because if going off the gold standard because gold is no longer precious is so bad it would have already caused harm, and behavior about overpopulation by increased Competition for reduced Resouces, not the gold itself seems to be the cause of the debt the world is having now. Gold has been around for millions of years and most people weren't in debt in the Bronze Age. Anything relatively scarce can be used for money and there always will be at least something that can be used for money. I think I'll invent giant gold VISA wheels, where will I find a big enough wallet to store the reciept! I've had this intuition about the real cause of Spain's defeat in 1588. I think it was not so much because of the gold, but because after the conquest of Mexico, the Spanish started to look ahead to the future and realized that many people would always think of the Spanish conquistadores who did this as villians, and their conscience became a burden. Words may be more powerful medicine than any prescription ever invented and no doubt the constant bad press the Spanish no doubt got from the rest of the world I think may have had an unforeseen impact on Spain the Spanish hadn't thought of leading to their loss of advantage. Some more gold may not necessarily be bad.


If all goods will be cheaper because of fusion, this may have major impact on history in countries like Russia or the nations of Africa because one of the main causes of the separation of rich and poor here historically has been because of the weather. In Russia for example the royalty was in power all the rest were so poor because it was unnatural in evolution to live that far North. The rich were the only ones able to afford to live indoors with the fires kept burning without so much effort that they had other time for other activities. Obviously today as well, if you go outside and it's 40 below or 110 all the time it's going to influence what you think and feel. For the countries with extreme outdoor weather more power would make it so that they could afford more heat and air-conditioning and larger buildings such as luxury condominiums, as well as better health care. So fusion would also cause more overpopulation, which may cause more problems with increased competition for the most important resource of all room to live. But because of the room problem we'll have to reduce it anyway and if we can reduce it for one reason we may also reduce it for others by whatever science may be (see above link above about overpopulation). Nonetheless fusion if achieved may make so many of the third world nations rich, democracys may take hold and thrive, and so may become a major influence on the future history of the world. I believe they want democracy, or if they were able to afford at any rate they would achieve it. As I say on This Link there is a moderately high to strong correlation between available resources like good weather and greatness or poverty in the history of civilizations. Democracy thrives in health and moderate wealth, and bad weather is unhealthy. Good weather and wealth created by fusion power may be the answer.

--------

What Powers Gamma Ray Bursters?

As it says on this link ("Why is the Universe's Brightest Blast Still Blazing?" New Scientist 4 08) beliefs of science about gamma ray bursters rely on jets to explain the otherwise high energy levels of these explosions. But this explanation failed with this weeks observations because the jets of most explosions were believed to lose power when they hit the plasma around the expansion. A more massive gamma ray source is believed to lose power more rapidly than the lower energy ones, and this is the most powerful and it's been burning longer than most. And without higher power jets beaming in our line of sight just to us to explain the more concentrated radiation source, they can't explain what powers this huge explosion, the most massive seen in the cosmos (other than the Big Bang.). One problem this model of the bursters has is about the jets being aimed to us, I've never read of any gamma ray bursters that blink on and off. The supposed source of the gamma ray bursters is a massive star. Almost any star has rotation with the jets at a bit of an angle to the poles, so it would seem at least some of the gamma ray sources would blink on and off.


As I say on this link about the possiblity of a fifth and sixth force, the jets of galaxies are too massive and too fast to be explained by fusion, I think this may be explained by a fifth and sixth force (the sixth force is the reaction pair to the fifth force by Newton's Law of action reaction pairs). This would also offer a way out for the power source of the bursters. While most smaller stars would just have fusion, only the more massive stars combined with the most powerful implosion would be energetic enough to cause the ignition of the explosion outward. This power source I call superfusion. Please see the link "Fifth and Sixth Force" for my complete explanation of how this could be so.
.

How I Rest and Love My Neighbor

If you're like my neighbor with the TV I sometimes watch who wants quiet too, I sure sympathize, others think I'm a good neighbor because of this, they even put up commercials perhaps to praise me with a biz bloom. If my TV is in bloom a giant flower is in my roof! This is why I started to listen to FM audios 120 months ago and the ear protection I thought of of plugs on wires, to be considerate of others, the stations I pick up play that song "You Light up my Yawns" Mostly I just pray for real wit where I've been with my world for years and that I've always tried to earn other's praise so they've been a real boom. With real consideration, all words are WorthWords I'm praying for understanding, and I'll achieve all I must to help the world.

How to Save Our Shores From Floods

-
A More Viable Seawall

A new type of cheap retaining wall or dam has been invented that could be used also as a levy when the waters rise. There are only four types of bridges they have been able to build in all of science, The Beam, it's a post across the river (or a road if you're our famous courier named Theresa, Joyce or Tammy). The Truss which is supported from the sides to the center, The Arch, and the Suspension Bridge. While the suspension bridge is a sort of arch upside down, the biggest bridges are all suspension bridges because this is the most strong, but interestingly enough while there are lots of arch dams and dams of other types, other than inflatable dams, there were no dams based on suspension (preacher's say we may all be in suspension above heck's damnation!) Like the suspension bridge, suspension dams may be of worth because of the large amount of lift they support per unit of structural material used to make the machine.

Before Hurricane Katrina hit many like me tried to think of a way to make a good seawall like an inflatable wall that would be affordable and strong to save New Orleans from the risk of storms. Innovators thought of an inflatable wall, but couldn't figure out how to anchor it securely so none of the water would leak through. The problem, with an inflatable wall like an inflatable dam, is that if it leaks, it has twice as much that can go wrong, because it can both leak water and air. This idea was improved by making it just a strong cover of material to hold the water held up on both sides by a strong wire or hawser the wire connects to via support beams like the towers of a suspension bridge, these are of a special type that have heavy weights on the side to the water the towers lean toward also so they use gravity when pulled upward to help make the wall strong against the incoming waves. The side near the land is dug in deep for support with a deep post at the same angle as the tower which is angled away from the land, so the gravity of the weights and the foundation of the posts gives them the strength needed to withstand high waters if needed but at a lower cost of materials like the suspension bridge. To build the wall or dam the towers would be rolled to the site and the cover of the dam put over the heavy line between the towers, the sheet would be stretched to a small waterproof wall closer to the water it would be attached to with such as clamps or stones on top with the sheet stretched farther seaward with more rocks or concrete ect., to secure the foundation if the most watertightness is needed, like for high dams inland. The lower waterproof seawall is important because it would be easier to see if it leaked because it's much smaller than a giant dam, saving lots of materials and labor but reliable enough to be viable.

---
To find out if it's worthy two walls would first be built, a few feet apart parallel to the shore, if it turns out there are almost no leaks the walls built in later times would just have one wall. Small scale (a few feet high) suspension walls of this sort could be tested in wave tanks.

This would be a good safety dam sort of like a safety net so the web could be made much higher, faster and cheaper than the Mars Jars! (Faster, Better...Was the NASA slogan). To build a dam the hawser would be stretched from two strong anchors on both sides, then the dam stretched over it then the tarp would be secured. Dams of this sort could be used in flooding sides of rivers in place of sandbags fast if the low waterproof walls near the waves along the shore to be protected were built and well proven to be anchored and watertight. Digging would be easier with seawalls because there aren't alot of optic fiber wires, propane, and clumps of grass and other unpredictable stuff the water would go through like on river banks, causing leaks without more caution. Seawalls may also be much improved by the floating wave barriers that have been devised that break the waves before they hit, anchored to the seafloor by standard sea anchors farther out in the ocean. The covers could be reinforced with strong wires made of carbon fibers like fullerenes or proton wires fibers made of much stronger density of the strong force, held together by the poles of each proton and without ionization even if of protons by a tube of electrons around the proton core, a sort of continuous atom which would have more strength in tension than any other electromagneticaly bound solid except because of the strong force compression of the field of each pole of the protons. If the wave cancelling barriers were not completely efficient, even if the towers are anchored by both gravity and beveled, the oscillation of the wave motion may make the towers work loose. With these super strong solids, lightweight plates could be made instead of the tarps held by the lines, these would be more stable and easier to put up. They lean toward land, and the towers supporting the shields beveled away from it, with the weights on the side of the towers away from land to add stability, and the wave barriers out to sea would cancel most of the wave motion.

---

Why Creativity is Good for You

.
THE WORTH OF CREATIVITY IN LIFE

Creativity is good for you! Many studies find that creativity such as watching comics is good for body and mind. There are many realms where I got this idea from edits of soundbites, I would play a tune slow and make a few goofs with improvisations, and listen on the tape to both the good and bad. Then when I speeded it up (chipmunk power!) by accident it sounded more professional. My conclusion was "good" randomness that violates no rule is a good basic (entry level and higher) way to win. The higher speed of the cassette made it so the small goofs were stopped while allowing all the good sounds. This would be why they say 4 out of 5 people like sped up speech more than slow, like in business promotions on the box.

And when I would compete with a chess machine in other realms it would compute with consideration when power was the same, but later if it was winning, it wouldn't take much labor, because it would seem all moves it would make would win (Or so it thought! I'll win a rug in the Euro Hoosier Mega VIS in 1997 eventually!). Then I got wiser because when the pieces were reset, after this with each go round of play I would win by moving a piece to an interstice of the defense, then on the next move I would move it deeper in with this motif, adding a bit of random motion inside the competition's lines, then following in with more moves in the trail blazed by the first (medium value so strong enough to win but not so strong it was a risk if the piece was lost) and better creativity yet. Because the machine couldn't move it's own pieces well inside its own line of defenses, this acted as a sort of trap and was then in my favor because with no place of the machine to move the helpless higher value pieces, I would win, just by moving any move. This motif I called a point advance (the point is where the piece lodges in the interstice) is a miniature of the competition as I said above about the machine moving any which way if it has the advantage at the end of the competition. In authorship 007 I was always taught to learn the rules before I would learn how to be creative within them. And in all four of these events, with music, the general competition, the point advance and the authorship, first is the setup that is without error and then the unusual moves, this is why creativity is important, because this type of motif is so common in what's most brilliant in life.
.

How to www. An Earthbound Asteroid For Mining!

Stars and Comets May Have Trillions Worth Of Water for Rocket Fuel, Air, and Cozy Mud Baths!

Fighting an earth impact asteroid with another smaller asteroid captured in earth orbit is considered on the SPACE.com page to be a possible way to defend the earth, Click Here.. (The problem is not capturing the small asteroid but hitting the incoming one, and all the small pieces would perhaps hit us). As I say Here I think asteroids could be made to not expand outward in chunks if impacted by use of a web of lightweight proton wires, protons held in high strength by their alternation of N and S poles stronger than all other chemically or magnetically melded materials because of the lines of compression of the fields via the strong force of the protons. The idea of the proton wire net to hold the asteroid in one piece could be used to make it so the asteroid blast plan would be viable or the other plan on the link about stopping the asteroid with a smaller stone. The net would be thrown over both asteroids and tightened. If the big block were then blasted or impacted with the small asteroid to move it rapidly out of the earth's path, the radioactive rocks or other rocks from the other type of impact inside the web wouldn't hit us. The proton wires would be stronger than other types of materials already known to stop a blast, e.g. concrete, but much lighter in weight and cheaper.

.
. While this plan would have the advantage of rapid deployment in case we were with not much advanced warning, my belief is that the most viable way to defend against asteroids would be to just gently nudge it sidewise with laser or other beams, perhaps capturing the asteroid in earth orbit so we can mine it for useful materials. There are actually 40 block sized masses per day that go between the earth and moon, and the water and other stuff of many of them would be of worth to capture in permanent earth or moon orbit because just the small lake of ice they found on the moon is worth trillions in hydrogen and oxygen for rocket power boosts, air, and water.

The use of a beam to move the asteroid in earth or lunar orbit is of worth for two reasons; because of all the room, Scientific American says most of the time we would get plenty of advanced warning if an asteroid was going to hit us eventually, going around perhaps 1000 times, so the beam could be used with more ease each time the asteroid zoomed nearer us. The earth is a small target within so much room. And of it would be like a Rolling Stones tour with lower cost! Worth Mich to the rich! The other reason is there would be no risk of any fallout by this more gradual motif of solution.
..
.

COMEDY VIII.
..
I found out many soap operas are filmed in Miami Beach, this is why they talk real slow in the south!

I like my herbs Veggies For Life. They're so cheap, I save. At this price my life may last many more months-or 1200!

How to save a lot, I just put a wet washrag on my face to sooth and relax my face and make my web visit to Miami Beach!

Did you know cows when played classical Mozart music in Europe milked higher in FlavORich than cheeze? When they tune up the milk truck, more than 55 horns and 76 violins of renoun in concert were herd!

My neighbor says she calls em as she sees em. She has a Mp3 with Hitachi!
.

Did you know? China Telecom has put a cell tower on the higher mountains in the world. When you type in you hear echos of big busy signals!

What's the worst place to buy perscriptions, in a consignment shop-or second hand!

It's been said there is no bad that does no bring good. Dandruff? It will always be a winter wonderland all month!

They've found talking on a cell bell when asleep causes insomnia, how so? If when talking my sleep I would say "Ma Bell hugs us with a sleeping cushion filled with cash, thanks for the price war!" seems like a more cushy solution.
~~~

What's good about shopping where I live is we can finally walk through Walls-Marts at the moment we are in the store!

MORE COMIC/CULTURAL LINKS

As you see on this site from the top of the web list (click here) the idea of quantum computing still has the major problem of decoherence; while they can change the bits to read the memory, the bit is changed so much by reading the information to retrieve it the memory stored is lost. So even at present with all the hoo ha about this type of machine, it's more who than hurrah, and unproven science, it's of worth except it's presently unviable!
.
In usual chips there is just an on off of the transistor and is considered to be optimal because it's simple, so base 2 with just the on and off is how most computers are made. It's considered more economical, but it's only because of the way chips are made. With more ways to move, say a continuous circle ("pick a number, pick 100 if you like", you'll always win at 21!") with a higher number of optimals than just on and off, you could store higher amounts of information.
.
Hardware that uses how an atom can rotate continuously in space with changes in applied voltage has been invented, a wire made of two types of alternating atoms; the sensor atoms, and the atoms that continuously rotate to store precious memories of the beach and the heat. A second set of wires intersect with each sensor atom to read them. In the patent the sensor atoms are unlike the bit atoms because to be readable the bits have to be more easy to change, and if so the information stored could be deleted if the atoms were moved by the voltage going through to also read them. The voltage going through the sensor atoms themselves is of low enough power so they leave the atoms with the stored data unchanged, just passing near enough to sense what is encoded in the position of the 360 degree coordinate of the alternating storage atoms beside them. To see that this is possible think of a sofa and the tiny beam of light that you see it by, not much changing the sofa. The idea is to make use of this small change to read the data and the continuous rotation of atoms to store much more data with each atom. this is sort of like a wrench that has both a continuous gear that opens and closes the clamp on the bolt and a second component that locks the wrench in place once it's adjusted. By way of the continual rotation and the lock, the information of thed general position of the wrench can then be read by a bolt without risk of the wrench losing grip, the risk of the decoherence would be like the loss of clamp without the lock on the wrench. The inertia and mass of the nonsensor atom is actually more than one atom for inertia so it resists the more slight motion of the sensor atom to read the position of the nonsensor atom(s) so it's nonvolatile and readable too by the optimal inertia or friction to store the bits so it both changes and stores the change too. They've thought of this idea with electrons where each angle of the electrons spin would be a bit, but atoms like the sofa are more continuous so with continuous applied voltage, instead of just having perhaps four bits of the electrons, or just two bits, you have 50 or 100 or even 50,000 for a chip with each bit in turn the size of an atomic element or small molecule (or even protons welded via the alternation of the N and S pole of each so much smaller and faster, by Chin's tunneling experiments here's my own Faster Than Light page about my belief about Chin's experiments) and because atoms or molecules are more continuous than electrons, this could be like with radio stations where they add more bandwidth to stations by compression so there are three hundred stations instead of just 20 on the radio. It might seem there are just two electric charges, + and - there are just two bits involved. But there are actually billions of possible TV stations. The electromagnetic field of light is actually a continnum. Because spacetime and voltage is continuous like the wavelength of light in relativity there may eventually be 50,000 bits possible. The speed of light is quantisized and solid, but the wavelength is continuous, because to conserve energy, when part of the field becomes more solid, some other nearby component must be more flowing, if we find these continuous components and good ways to control and measure them, computation wins for us all and you and me, even that 57th grade marm in college!
.
By making the reading and writing method of the optimal sensitivity by changing the elements just so, a computer like this would read and write at the same time at higher speed than even me, like that described in Popular Science in the August 1999 issue, by way of science called magnetic random access memory or "ma-gram", and grand-ma may well appreciate it! Grand-ma would replace not just the RAM but also other media of computers. Magram uses small wires with N S poles and their own sensor, this goes at 90 degrees so it stores the bit read by the sensors, but it's just base two. PM says it could be far faster than hard drives. Using just atoms instead of small magnets would allow much higher speeds because they would be smaller. Once the "store" atoms are at the angle to store the data, the angle is stored (saved) by making the field go from more fluid to solid by changes of the voltage, ect, in a rapid phase change, sort of like from fluid to solid somewhat. This or just the inertia of the nonsensor saves the information so when the machine is off no power is needed to restart. By reading the data from the sensor wires, the bits are intact even if the voltage of the main wire is unchanged because the voltage to read the sensors is lower than the voltage needed to change the main wires.
.
Another related invention that has been devised is just using changes in voltage or wavelength that are changed and retained and read by way of sensors. Since this type of change like the rotation of the atoms is continuous, non quantum, and readable, here too information can be stored.
.
This would make it so if you had the same number of atoms to make a 50 G hard drive if it was atomic, with each atom storing 50 times as much data, the same memory chip would be 2500 Gs, nonvolatile, cheaper than conventional RAM, much higher in speed, and with lower power consumption and heat loss.

On sites like the Wikipedia Timeline of Quantum Computing
you see all this progress in quantum computing NEW! IMPROVED! but without the problem of coherence solved, progress may need to continue indefinitely of this sort. If quantum computing is so great, why are so many advances being made in other fields like soap opera editing computers or weather control ? While it may be of worth eventually, by using a low power sensor and the non sensor bits, coherence is solved by a much simpler motif, and no complex nonlinear codes are needed to read it, base 25 or base 50 is simple math.
.