COMICS
-
Dental surgeons are using clips from MTV so pain of the patient is stopped more when the drill is in operation, and my nurse has memorized all the words of a million Old Wave rhymes!

They say yoga is more famous out west than in India. It's amazing-a real stretch of imagination! I was able to hold my breath for 3000 cycles of passing out with Denise Austin!


They've invented electric shoes that tie by the grip on your foot while you while you walk. (If I should so tie my feetwear, my shoes would jog away in the 80's!)

They have computers that actually improvise by the musicians song in time. The musician toots and then the computer improvises, the musician drums, and so forth. This is me in the shower, or as the family likes to say about my songs- me in a soundproof room!

Did you hear the fashion dames in Rome are on strike? They want more regulation so just the professionals have the evidence they earned a degree in advanced dish!

I had an old handheld tape dubber type sound machine, AM/FM, left and right-a sh'boom sh' boom box!

I learned how to drive safe- all the RV's and other machines at the college were so smashed up we couldn't drive them, so no accidents!

I had a TV I stacked on my tape dubber so I would save more room, and in all the months since I put them on the shelf, the movies had not once fallen in the sound!

THE FOLLOWING IS FOR THOSE WHO ARE UP ON MODERN PHYSICS, I'LL TRY TO JUSTIFY EACH MEMO WELL, AFTER I REEDITED THIS IT'S FOR MORE A GENERAL AUDIENCE, EVEN SO, IF YOU'RE GOOD AT MATH OR SOUNDS, SEE MAIN LINKS PAGE SITE MAP UPPER LEFT FOR MY MATH AND MUSIC, COMICS AND SO ON. IN ANY EVENT FOR PHYSICISTS OR THOSE INTERESTED IN PHYSICS...

.
Possible ways to Actuate Gravity Waves

I read in Popular Mechanics how the physicist of world renoun, Ning Li, a few years ago built the working antigravity machine (this was in the old Popular Mechanics I consider this more reliable, the new edit is by another author). It uses the spins of many particles (such as protons') electric fields to change the flow of the field.


This site says about N. Lee's experiments

"A third method for antigravity described in the book which is also still being considered today by some, is spinning a superconducting disk at high rpm and causing a reduction in gravity above the disk. While our knowledge of gravity is so limited that it is difficult to say that this method will not work, there is a natural example that does disprove this method as having any effect on gravity. Neutron stars are very dense bodies that spin very very rapidly, and as they cool down over time, the core of the Neutron star becomes superconducting. If a rapidly spinning superconductor had any ability to block or weaken gravity, it would have very noticeable effects on neutron stars and those effects are not seen. For as the core cooled and became superconducting, the core would block the gravity holding the neutron star together, which if it blocked enough gravity, the neutron star would explode in a truly massive explosion. Even a small partial weakening of gravity would cause the neutron star to expand which would slow the rotation of the star and in turn would slow the pulsating radio signal that these stars emit. A slowing with age, has not been observed in neutron stars, so rapidly spinning superconductors do not have any effect on gravity."

I think the assumption that the stars and spinning wheel are the same is not guaranteed disproof. It was assumed by the greeks up to the time of the 19th century that two lines are always parallel. With more science saavy Einstein found that with enough distance, the lines merge with enough distance. And two elements on the periodic table are already so complex there's no way to know what the properties of the chemicals the combine to will be. No way is known to predict the properties of salt from the elements that combine to lower blood pressure better than salt. The assumption that the spinning wheel and the star are the same is not proven, the shape of the spinning wheel is planar and the star is round. Shape often has a good bit to do with what a field is about, as in the above about the lines of geometry and gravity. Subatomic particles don't have exact spherical shape (the proton has been found to actually be shaped like an exercise brightbell) so they may stack in ways that cut off or cause the lines of superconductivity itself, another way the geometry of the field may not allow that the disc and the star are the same. And a neutron star is hot. The antigravity machines of Li use supercooled particles. A dense star has extreme heat, so it may take much more cooling than the star has to make the star superconduct. There are many who believe that neutron stars don't create much of a ray, and it may even be possible the light seen is not from these types of stars, and are, for example from stars that lase, like a laser. All this allows that likening neutron stars to machines like Li's is not disproof of the antigravity machines of this type. I think it's at least possible.


All forces are made both of waves and particles. The waves send the information about the particles between them, so that they are connected and this makes them all one field so energy conservation, the most well proven general theory in the history of science, is upheld. So not too suprising is that Einstein predicted that gravity waves transmit the force of gravity in the early 1900's.

I think Lee's machine is not impossible because Einstein himself believed in electrogravity, here's why I agree with Einstein about electrogravity itself and experiments to prove or disprove my possuble additions to it.

If this turns out to be other than the usual electric fields that lift us up against the gravity it may be a good gravity wave telescope. If you have two antennas of the same wavelength they resonate well (if they are unlike they pick up gossip stations!). I've theorized that gravity being lighter than light would travel faster than light ( or see Below MY EXPLANATION Of FASTER THAN LIGHT WAVE MOTION (NOW FOUND IN THE LAB By CHEN'S EXPERIMENT) so Li's machine may prove or disprove this, and if it sends the waves well, being a good emitter it may also absorb the waves efficiently and may be a way to send faster than light information via the waves.

. A problem with gravity waves if they are lighter than light by far may travel much faster than light, you can throw a bottle of fizz much farther and faster than a fizz machine, overall so gravity would travel much faster than light. If it is this fast Lee's machine wouldn't pick up the signal well even if it is a good emitter and absorber of gravity waves (see above).

This would be because Einstein's Special Relativity says that the electric charges of the machine itself being electromagnetic and about Special Relativity, wouldn't be able to go faster than light because of the all important (electromagnetic) speed of light to relativity except in the special exception of the heavy particles of subatomic physics that are more dense than electric charges (see below).

Antigravity/Gravity Augumentation Using Oscillation of Centrifugal Force, My Experiment and Comments

GRAVITY POWERED MACHINES, ARE THEY GOOD PHYSICS? THE SECOND EXPERIMENT.

A Super Zoom, How to Find Earthlike Worlds

You see these telescopes that use an array of small collectors at a distance that are unified to combine the images from the seperate machines so it's as if it's one image from a giant telescope. We have been in the age of astrononomy without astronomers looking up at the stars for 30 years. The number of photons collected per day with the great distances seen is so small the only way to see is via photos of the light, collected over days or months. A type of telescope that's been devised is to use what are known as magnetic bubbles, these are of worth to sail through the solar system with cheap power via the solar wind. The bubbles expand with more distance from the sun and with more surface area the amount of the force to move it stays the same, making magnetic bubbles a cheap way for future starships to reach beyond the solar system's shores and shoals of space. My belief is these bubbles may make a giant lense and there would be no image problems like displacement of light by the adaptive optics if a special kind were used. To make the bubble into a great telescope the magnetic field would leave and enter two N-S sides of the machine. To take out most of the random change, it's believed the inward flow of the field would be watched for changes by another beam through the field after it had focused the light, and the general small motions of the field lines would be taken out of the image by way of the sensor. Once the telescope was in focus enough in general to see the disc of a nearby world the computer would focus better, and then a more distant world or star would be in focus and so on to the maximum resolution. When you have a lense like the lenses in use, even with other ruses the modern science of light uses like the images unified by the machines to improve the picture, these machines are still limited by not that much more light collected and this is the main problem. If you have five machines and they collect amount a of light an hour if you have a magnetic bubble that's 500,000 times the size it would collect 500,000 times the light/hour. This would either allow astronomers to return to the machine or for us to find images at 500,000 times higher resolution, and this would be how to find the worlds like the Earth.


ABOUT SUBCOMPONENTS OF SUBATOMIC PARTICLES AND THE ELECTRIC FIELD
.
Good subatomic physicists have thought for thirty years there are many fractional charges (wikipedia) possible for the electric or strong force charge, but these are not found with the atom smashers. The fractional and other quantum numbers combine to explain all the hundreds of subatomic particles, not one combination has been seen to disprove the building blocks of fractional charges, this is why the fractional charges are considered of worth to science. Even so no one has been able to prove why no isolated fractional charges are seen or why the force between them seems to even be stronger at lower energy and more distance, about 10-13 cm the radius of a meson or baryon the heavy particles of subatomic physics. If the general framework is relativity and the strong electric charges on the outside layer of each meson or baryon, this could control all the rest so relativity would be upheld even if mere light and electromagnetic charges were the general foundation by Maxwell's exact prediction of the speed of light based on the density of the field being the cause of the speed of the waves through it. In my improvement of Maxwell's explanation, the speed of light is not the top speed because the speed can be faster or slower than light just by changing the density of the field of the strong force or other force, just like usual waves in other media. (Gravity may move much faster than light because it's much lighter while the strong force may move a good bit faster than light because it's more dense, both types of wave ones that speed up with increasing or decreasing density are needed in physics because of energy conservation what's increased by one wave is decreased by another in the balance of Newton's third law, action reaction.). This about the speed of waves via density is a more general idea than Einstein's where the speed of light we have to take on faith because it would unify more of physics, and this would be for instance as in Relativity why all the mass and energy around us doesn't move at the speed of light or why the sun doesn't convert mass to energy instantly, as I have abridged for you in my Physics Synopses. If the heavy particles like the mesons and baryons are more dense than Relativity would allow, the above would allow that they are still controlled by Einstein's E=mc2 even if the strong force is usually much more stout than electric charges. This allows both my improved version of Maxwell's general causology of motion (even though he later abandoned this idea even if he had used it to predict the speed of light) at both faster and slower than light (based on changes in wave density being proportional to changes in speed like Maxwell's) and Einstein's in subatomic physics where the spin of the electric charges at higher radii and lower energy obey relativity because the electric charges are unified so the speed of light is in comtrol. The strong force is more dense than the electromagnetic field so it would spin faster than light.

If mass energy is conserved and so is quantity of motion, it makes sense that mass energy is motion. Energy moves in a linear path, and if mass is motion as well it would have to move also, and since it can't move linearly, it would be spin that would determine mass generally. The atom bomb has lots of linear motion derived from the spin of the strong force, this much power would be stored in a simple way, because extremes are often about simplicity.

... If the mass is spin and the fractional quanta have the same spin as a lower density electron, how can a particle be of any other mass than an electron, of 1837 times more mass and the more complex properties are unexplainable by Einstein's theory? In the standard theory just integer or half integer spins are allowed for all particles, the subparticles of hadrons also would have the same spin as all other particles of the standard causology. Einstein's own relativity would govern the outside spin of the hadrons at the usual speed (of light) as much as it could when the heavy particle was created, flexing the more dense electromagnetic field than usual making it strong enough by interaction with the strong force to control all the general properties of the strong force. Maxwell's causology and my generalization of it would perhaps control physics inside the meson or bayron's spin at faster than light, once the power is poured in the cup and also out by means of the mediation of the strong electromagnetic field. This is of power enough by the higher speed strong force acceleration and the reaction back of the electromagnetic field via relativistic effects to more strongly control the strong force than electricity would at usual energies. To explain the much heavier mass of hadrons and the more complex properties of the strong force the spin is faster inside the heavy particle, but always is slowed on the outside, just to the usual speed of the spin.
.
To make a higher power hadron you must take an electron or other low power charge and power it up (riches are cheaper if poverty is saved). This is because of energy conservation, you can't just make a higher power field out of no field. So you always have to start out with a charge of just 1 or -1, the only charges of electromagnetism seen. This is 100% of a charge, the strong force in my causology of GWM, General Wave Mechanics then divvies this up into the fractional charges, they are of fractional charges just inside the realms of such as mesons or baryons. With the fractional charges they're lighter than light so they spin inside the hadron at faster than light. No fractional charges are seen outside the hadron, when they would go outward they would plow the strong electric field, slowing them to the speed of light. At just the speed of light the charges would unified in accord with the speed to the 100% of the charge outside the hadron, and so they would return to just 1 or -1. This would explain why even though most physicists have believed the fractional charges make up the baryons and mesons in combinations that allow all the hundreds of heavy particles, no isolated electric charges other than 1 or -1 have been observed in the machines, because of relativity.

In my belief Einstein's causology is proof about the field outside the hadron and elsewhere being in control via the speed limit here of light, but the speed of light is not fundamental; many types of machines exist and the way heavy particle would be always built is just one way among many possible in subatomic physics. Few of us download a hat when we wake up in shower in the AM/FM. The idea that to make a higher power field by the flow of power through a low power field is arbitrary in GWD.

My causology of a meson or baryon;

There are four layers, from outside radius in;

A. The outside layer of electric field at the speed of light, giving the hadron its electric charge and other long range electromagnetic motifs including conservation of relativity in all longer distance physics (except perhaps the lower than electromagnetic density of gravity).

B. A layer of low energy matter wave between this and the realm of fractional charges of the strong force blending the strong force in with the outer layer connecting the strong field with the electric field at the speed of light via the field,

C. The imploding strong force field, spinning and imploding at faster than light according to it's density via my extension of Maxwell's theory (this would explain Chin's experiment that found tunneling through hadrons at about 1.3 times the speed of light, in inverse average speed to the reduced weight of the lighter fractional charges, which are about the same amount lighter than the speed measured is faster than light) and

D. the innermost radii of the weak charge.

The layer between the strong force and the electric field would be connected by a field like a matter wave Einstein proposed in the EPR paradox. This would be needed to link the information between the fractional charges and the outer electric field. This wouldn't be connected by a usual electromagnetic field because with the difference in speed between the fractional charges of the strong force and the outer field, field lines with more friction would radiate out lots of energy powered by the strong force continously flexing, and this is not found. The low power layer of between layer a. and c. at the speed of light and faster than light would be much the same as the field connecting electrons with the nucleus in the atom. While actually layers a, b, and c are blended well they are distinct enough to be of descriptive worth. An alternate way to the low radiation limit may be by the more wavelike and mostly atractive implosion of the strong force, concievably it may have low efficiency in it's interaction with the charges so they would be accelerated to just somewhat faster than light when the strong force slides past the electric charges with considerable relativistic boost to the mass, but no more than the limit of the efficiency.

The reason the strong fractional charges radiance could be imploded without much outward flow of field except via the virtual field could be because the strong force, like gravity, is of low efficiencey. Forces are actions and reactions, energy conservation holds by balance, like a weight on a boom you use to measure another weight. Gravity and electromagnetism are one action reaction pair, and the strong force, with the short range weak force are another. Electromagnetism and the Weak Force were unified in the Nobel prize winning Electroweak theory, these are the two short range contact forces in physics, they both have pairs of charges and expand on pressure. They are of lower efficiency than 100% by radiance of heat with work being done. But like the strong force, gravity never wears out or runs down, it's attractive with expansion never seen. So gravity with electromagnetism is like the strong with the weak force, forming the two main actions and reactions of physics. The strong force, if like gravity would have 100% or near 100% efficiency of implosion, so the field wouldn't leak out radiation from the much higher speed field of the strong force, even with continous flexing and much work being achieved. All the power of the strong force except the connection to the outer electric field would implode inward and power the Weak force. If more of the fractional charges would be in heavier hadrons, they would spin faster and add more spin to the outside electric field via the virtual field, this would keep the electric field and the strong force unified, so it always would be converted in E=mc2 with the usual linear power of relativity.

This would explain how relativity is upheld in subatomic physics, the larger mass of heavier particles than electrons by more spin at faster than light, and why the fractional charges always unify to 1, -1, or 0. Once the strong force would implode the field of the fractional charges, this flow would be channeled down to the central weak force charge, heating it up like the heating of the electric charges of the earth, by gravity, except with the other two forces, the strong force and the weak radiant force. So this implosion eventually powers the radiation of the atomic power via radioactivity.

Evidence for Faster Than Light and Ways To Definitely Prove or Disprove GWD, and Other Related General Physics.

How The 21st Century Moving Sidewalks May Move Into The 21rd!

They say in Popular Science the reason we don't have moving sidewalks outside in the 21st century is because they are tough to maintain so they are just used in like airports. An interesting solution may be a molecular moving sidewalk which can also be used as a motor in other use. On sites like click here they say it's been found that specific heat of atoms may be changed with unpaired spins of nucleons like protons and neutrons so this changes the overall heat flow from the source. The center of an atom is a spin powered by the strong force, this then carries over to the spin of the atom or molecule as a whole via the electric charges of the protons and the outer electrons interaction. So if you make a long chain of these atoms it would spin somewhat like rollers on the conveyer belt powered by the strong force (or if not this, a powered atomic conveyer belt where the spin of the atomic rollers is with electric power would be of worth). Usual atoms of heavy mass have opposite strong force particles, the spin mostly cancels out in most molecules. This is why most of the stuff around us is without spin. Some hydrogen atoms have just one proton alone and no opposite strong force neutron, so all the spin may be transferred to the outer electron, because it's not canceled by the opposite neutron. So if the rollers were on a conveyer belt in theory it would pull you along by a cheap powered source and the rollers may not have to be often replaced.

Basically there is no heat output of unpaired atoms once they are at another level of power. Otherwise all the atoms of the earth would put out huge amounts of energy, so this type of conveyer belt would have to have an outside power source wired in. It may make a conveyer belt by this motif.

The inventor says the rollers can be of optimum size and with space between the rollers so they have no friction and could be made so small if well spaced with small teeth they could grind up bacillus and viruses to make a self cleaning surface that would also sort what's in the shelf top.

It may even be a cleansing parking lot powered by the solar heat so all the heavy metals and stuff that gets in all our rugs via our shoes would automatically be transorted to channels at the side of blocks of the atom conveyer and recycled. And since it would be cheap just lots of atoms it may even be a floor that spiffs up the room better than a Motel pool and although it's of more worth not compared to a housewife who swims out and saves the collection of lamps the family can't live without!


I wonder when they'll have heat powered auto clean Welcome Mats (A solar Hoo-RA to Hatshepsut!) These may have powered brushes that automatically clean your rug as you walk in the door of the lawn of your egyptian oasis, another idea was a cleaner that sees your feet by computer and sprays water on if your feet are sloshproof. I think they also on the web have door mat combinations, so as you open the door it always cleans off the mat, it's always auto clean. The door is leakproof via another flange. They may even extend the computerized electrolux to outside sidewalk cleaners eventually. This leaves me wondering if they may have cleaners that are a small blimp-if there are small blimps! This would be a small cyber sort of machine that would be programmed to clean shelves all the time. Current batteries ("all are") would be heavy, so beams in each room would continually charge it and it would dock in a mother station. Larger versions of this with more power and more helium would perhaps sort clothes and pick up in general.

I wonder if they'll have a machine that's a computerized cart that also has an arm that reaches up on the shelf, finds the items by bar code and puts them in the cart or carts for where the item is to be moved to. This computerized machine would go between the shelves till both were cleaned. If there was too much on the shelves to sort easily, there would be a larger storage area where the stuff would be first taken off the shelves and put in this area till all or most of the shelves were first sorted and then cleaned with cleaner and scrubbed. Once all the shelves were all sparkly and clean, the machine would find each cart on hold and then move the stuff to its shelf by the carts and the computerized arm to lift it. This is a machine that sorts a shelf or other level areas. Another way to save on robot arms which are high priced may be via using bins that tilt out for cleaning to drop in the arm/pipe to flow to the wheeled box that moves the stuff to other realms or sorts it. Using the molecular conveyer belt shelves may resort by moving all that's on the moving sidewalks floors and shelves, I wonder if this may be by way of all the shelves being a motor of that type so that whatever is on the shelf can be moved to a more usual moving conveyer belt inside the walls reached by way of a small or medium port on the wall of each shelf. If so all the stuff on the shelves could be moved to other shelves with no labor!

An idea about the power shelf has been devised that may be of worth to clean refrigerators, all the shelves would resort if there was always at least one conveyer belt available, and this would also reach the outside to the recycle box if the lunch was more than 2001 old! All the shelves could also be pulled out at once so the surfaces, as well as the food moved via computer, could also be sprayed, for more cleanup.


Research shows that women talk longer with less effort than men. The vocal chords of women are shorter and smaller so men are reduced in this power. You see women exercis-sing 24/7 for when Madonna concerts visit the aria!

And other findings are that men change their minds three or four times as often as women-but the women are always right!

What goes Ho Ho Slosh-Ho Ho Slosh? Santa in a fizz machine!

They've found that Box Lite is good for rest in brain research, or so they think!


POP FIZZ TOP 40 OF OPTHAMOLOGY

The day may not be far when you buy a wrist TV that has 500 DVDs of memory and weighs out at -287.9. They have these flexible displays you unroll like an old audiovisual of my visit like around the world in my room (a real round room). And they're improving 3d displays a lot, they've much improved this by beaming the information to the pixels by beams instead of wiring it with all the wires to the pixels. A wrist TV would be of real value for 3d, just by motion of your arm you would see lots more unlike with a stationary big TV. The monitor would still be on South Beach with a wrist TV or other wrist worn machine of this sort, I saw this on the justlense site, usually you see more area with side to side motion with a magnifier. While you see a small area you have to move your head or the Palm around to see the whole sight such as in a magazine, this would be awkward. Some say they may use zooms that move around at high speed so it's is like a big TV even if just on your wrist, since your eye sees it unified when it's of more speed. It would boost the wrist TV or other whiz biz you wear on your wrist like a Palm, so web authors may wear Wrist Palms on their arm! They now have TV's with small lenses on the screen, all the lenses sense where you are and aim the light to just your eye, it looks just like 3d but without the beer jugs you wear when they go to the pepsi plant for opthomology. Another use of this way to achieve 3d might be to put a giant TV on your wrist.

How Some Say Hovercraft May Make Inland Ports
..
Author Arthur C Clark hoped to forsee how hovercraft may go from land to water without stopping. Because of this he envisioned how a city like Kansas City would one day be a major port city. The idea of spray on magnetic bands that a magnetic levitation automobile would then be able to climb hills without sliding off the side of the road have been devised, and the idea of wheels for hovercraft to solve the problem has been via i.e. "hovercraft motorcycles". Wheeled hovercraft may not be that much better than just a truck on the roads because although it would go on both water and land and would be able to climb hills it would still have to have special roads on the other side of the slope down on the other side so it wouldn't crash in the wind. The idea of the bands sprayed on the road for the hovercraft to have magnetic attraction to the road may be a solution. Wheels with magnetic bands would be on the leading and following bumper of the machine, these would add stability on hills, and spray on bands on the side of the road would be good so sideways motion would be reduced, and the land and water are finally smoother!

Popular Science and others published a plan to dig tunnels below the ground or the city that would hold tubes like intermodal freight containers that would go at high speed by compressed air in the tubes. This would reduce a lot of the traffic on roads, roads are for the royal rich. It's almost where it would be about as cheap to dig and go below the roads and rooms than build more roads. Some say a better way would be to use the same land by the side of the road already owned by You and Us and put pylons on the side of the superhighways for the tubes. No more land would have to be bought and no digging so it would be much cheaper. The tube units and pylons would be simple to mass produce. Because it would be in the tube it would be at much lower decibels than trains. And it would go at much higher speeds with no collision because of the air seal that would slow a fast intermodal freight container so the air would cushion the space between the tubes.

Why is a cheap toupee also called a broadloom? It takes a rug to cover all the huge room where my roof left!
-

The earth has about 2000 thunderstorms at any given hour. Although thunder may be god's praise for a giant beach and motel in the heat, lightning causes 100 fatalities a year, and harms a thousand. The NASA site says the main problems of lightning for power are that it would take lots of high towers, which would cost too much and the second problem is, while a lightning bolt has lots of power fast, most of it is sound and light, both of which are uncollectable by our machines, i.e. we must go up to the clouds and return just to collect the power if most of the bolt is above the ground with light and sound collectors. And no doubt by collection of the power of bolts it would take a giant fuse box unless there were a more gradual trickle that would collect almost as much power without the giant boost, the same way lighting rods are safe for residential dwellers. According to calculations high towers would have to be built. A much cheaper method has been devised via particle beams all the way from the ground up. These are beamed from small robot helicopters, moved to the scene of approaching storms from a "mother ship" airplane sent out to cover each region from central stations. While many stationary towers are unfeasable, using and reusing lots of these small "towers" may make lots of money for the owners of this business. The power as it would trickle in before the charge could build up would be sent by another particle beam from the small robot helicopters to nearby power wires. The field around the outside of wire then carries the power to regional collectors or directly to the power co.
.
If many towers were used and all the bolts flowed always to safer realms by the guidance of the beams this may reduce the risk of lightning fatalities in nonrural areas. (My realtor has the divine right of site managers, where she parks her house boat when she drives to work and our living is by the shore.) A lightning bolt in a storm has about the power of a kiloton of fusion power and if all of it were collected gradually this is enough stored heat to heat the whole region via the stored up heat with perhaps lasers from a few central towers, or cool the area with cooling beams or electric coolers in summer. A laser beam from a tower using some of the stored power would beam a wide cone shape around a whole region, while stopping heat loss from a larger area. It would melt the snow in the winter as it falls (the main method of removal of heat from lawns from walks of me was always to wait for Christmas!). If lightning were stopped the earth would lose it's charge of about 270 volts in an hour, so long term it may be of worth to limit the amount of power collected. The beam of this second plan of a weather control tower would be turned off a bit if planes were between the lightning and the laser. To seal in the heat the cone would have a collecting wire where the laser would reach on the top of insulation wall around the outside of the area to be heated or cooled to recycle the power and keep the temperature praised for the rain by the farmers and praised for the heat by Aleutians. This urban zone would stop wind and melt snow as well as retain heat in winter, it would need more lasers to actually stop rain. Many in prehistoric times may have walked far for the hot and cool weather, it would just have taken 200 days a year of walking to stay without the heat in summer. We have this now, on June 21 we all go to OHIO!

Another possibility for lightning power collection is via electric generators for individual lightning protectors of residential zones. Like the portable towers above they wouldn't have to use superstrong wires or generators anymore than it would take to save a usual residence from storms since lightning won't strike a house because it absorbs all or most of the charge before it builds up, so with a continous connection, the imbalance of charge that a bolt of lightning rewires is mostly relieved by a more unified flow. This reduction of flow before it builds up might be aided by computer so it's powerful enough but not unsafe. So with just a small flow of power a small collection machine would find lots of power over a period of months or years . If the machine just cost 200 and if one storm a year hit and collected 600 (returned to the power vendor by just rewiring it with power wires beside the house where the power was boomed with a sigh) this would be 600 in profit per house a year. A franchise of these machines where they would offer the machines to others for part of the cash might be a good business. Or one business might lease out machines of either capacitors or generator gyros at no cost for a sort of calm sleep in storms if the cash is good for sleep.
.
.. Did you hear about that boater this week (Aug 10 06) who was fishing up in Ontario in his boat and a bear climbed up out of the lake and into the boat-So the boater jumped in the water and the bear accidentally hit the throttle so the boat sped away with the bear in it! And when the bear sped away in the boat, the boat was pushing the Van with TravelV.web at the Wheel!
.....

(How To Perhaps Make a Possible Relativistic Time Machine By Setting Up The Same Types of Electromagnetic Fields In The Lab And.... A Possible Augmentation of Special Relativity..)

....Einstein's causology of Special Relativity has shown that at near the speed of light, mass is augumented and time slows down, so if you go in a starship at the top speed and you revisited the world you would be like 30 years old and the world would be much more ancient. The slow time is well proven in subatomic physics, the lifetime of the mesons, leptons, and baryons slows when they go around the machine and they have more mass. Without Einstein subatomic physics would run out of events to see because they have to build the machines to compensate for the change in mass of relativity. My explanation of Relativity when you always hear about the speed of light (if so, I think your hearing is rum and excellence) is that all the time slowdown and other motifs are because of the electric field. So if they were able to build an earth bound machine here with us with a strong electric field it may actually be a way to prove some of the motifs Einstein predicted but haven't been observed like the contraction of the ship in the line of motion. Because it's not cheap to build a fast ship- And since it's about the electric field, like light, and in special relativity the time slows up and perhaps if easy to build by the Theory of Relativity, this may also be an economy time machine because of the relative motion of the field. If it had cheap enough months in the year of the S&L it would save without having to build a fusion powered fast ship like Einstein's explanation would need to reach the high speeds of relativity. This would be a good preservative for compounds, however people may still not be able to go in a machine like this if it's viable because of radiation. (I may still be able to read what your brainwaves are if you wear a hat with a read out above your brows what's on the web!)

Einstein's belief about the ionization was, if the high speed ship in constant speed would be at rest in their own rest frame the pressure of the field on all sides would be balanced so all the time spent on the ship would be just usual and all laws of physics would seem the same to the high speed movers. I think the spins may line up just like subatomic particles in a power field and this may be harm to our usual life of random fields, if the field were slowly booted up perhaps not by Einstein's view. Nigel Calder in his book Einstein's Universe says with the usual speed of 32 ft that masses fall with when such as near the earth, we would reach the speed of light in just months. Either way this sort of machine may be of value in proof or disproof of Einstein's Relativity. And if the field of power slows the months and hours by heat, perhaps reduced heat may even speed them, and we may rewind a huge AM rewind machine of science!

.. It would be good with the high speed ship's motion, if it's operation were proven with a small cheap machine that slowed time and caused the other relativistic motifs with just a photon of light or muon. And if this is of value, machines of higher power of this sort would be built. Einstein used the relative motion of either a magnet or wire (either would move in relative motion so it was a proof that either was valid) so the idea of moving the field to slow time may be as much of worth as moving the high speed mass or starship, the sort of advantage a wind tunnel has over just building a big airplane without as much cost, a way to assay our machines for travel perhaps at faster than light. to such as other worlds. A time machine of this sort may have a good foundation in the causes and experiments that already prove relativity.

..
The idea that all the Einstein motifs may be found by just powering up the electromagnetic field I got from Maxwell, superhero math whiz of Einsteen. Maxwell predicted the exact speed of light twenty years or so before Einstein using the density of the field as if a resilient medium, the more dense, the faster the wave. If the force between the constant electric charges they find is always the same, the speed of light from this density would always be constant. My belief is that the slow time and other motifs of relativity may be found with a high power machine, a time machine of this type may be safe for us about the radiation if the field is balanced on all sides and Einstein's theory holds well. Einstein thought the field was empty, it may be balanced during constant motion but the ship presses against a resilient field when it goes at other rates of motion.
..

If all the women in the world were combined they would weigh just 85% the mass of all the men-and the men are the ones who exalt the air in beautious paper outfits these stewardesses wear!

__________

TV dinners are bland, So bad I eat eat pizza as rich as a deep dish radio show!

Towers May Save High Rise Lives

Fires in high rise buildings have hurt many when they have to jump off roofs or out the windows in hopes of survival. They have a solution now, a helical tube that is extended up to the window by a special van, that clamps a platform on the window the person steps on and then slides and whirls down the tube to safety. A problem is driving the spiral tube to the burning building like driving the rescue van under the stoplights fast. Other inventors at sciencepro.com are working of the solution of this via a permanent tower on the outside of the building or embedded on the outside, the tower is said to be fire stairs in a tube, in the tube both for safety and beauty of the high rise. If a fire starts the tube with spiral inside would be rolled out and around the building to where it would save the most people. The spiral tower would roll on two rails at the top and the bottom of the building and reach the people to help. When it reached them by the rails it would clamp on the windows at any height by an automatic clamp and open the window. The person in the building would step out the window and on a platform connecting the tower and the window. Inside the tower the inventors say spiral stairs for people who weren't hurt would be beside small rails for faster evacuation. On the rails inside the spiral tube would be boxes on wheels with seats and seatbelts. The boxes would go up on rails powered by motors to the top of the tower and would be going by fast enough to offer aid to fast refuge at the base of the building on the return down. They say the spiral tower has both spiral stairs and rails for wheeled sofas with a cover so if either had bad luck the other would be used, and also railed cushion boxes would aid more people sooner if 100 people were at the top of the building. The inventors say one beauty of this is that all the levels of the building are with escape by the spiral tower because it offers escape from all the floors at that set of windows by the auto clamps to the platform to the spiral tower. The spiral tower invented by the other inventor from Israel recently just reaches to the top window to aid and all the other levels are just reached one at a time just from the top of the spiral. The inventors of this other permanent mobile tower claim this would be of use since even if builders have been building cheap to save rent, the cost of spiral towers like this would be much smaller than the cost of the whole building and would save the builders lots of insurance wages and the insurance companies would perhaps underwrite the cost to the builders to pay for the towers. Saving lives is more rich than just saving a bit of money. The side towers would be built lightweight and cheap and with built in ventilation so no fire or smoke would hurt the persons using the tower. The inventor says fire chiefs would have a seperate set of towers, with a rapid launch tube like they use in the circus to boot up the clown in the human cannon boom. The army is serioulsy considering this THROUGH THE AIR! For about a second and a half the soldier or other firechief to the people at the top would sail and land smooth at the shelf by computer aided jets right at the top of the building! It saves me a lot when I buy fizz, I like all it's got, Zero Fat, Zero PR, Zero Alzheimers risk, I stopped these months ago! This would be of use for military or nonmilitary life savers because the tower fizz boost may be put on the side of the building and then the soldier would go fast to the top and stop inside the tube with an small armored room at the top he could defend from with a windshield and gun ports. For their method for the high rise is where the fire chiefs would blast in a tube with a rail so much safer, with the same clamps of the windows at each level of the tube as in the civilian high rise spiral tube. The inventors say the fire hose would be raised up by a winch from the roof on the outside of the tube to the level the saving person reaches. Other inventors say the problem of hoses not being able to reach above about twenty floors and the huge pumps generally thought necessary for me to obey my thirst when up in the elevator watching CMT could be solved by a siphon method, the water would go up a center hose of the nozzle, and down a big outer tube, to a lower level than the base pump, and the difference in pressure would power the slosh that would put out the fire, and they say this big siphon for high rise usual use when no fire was present would perhaps even eliminate all pumps to power the water pressure when it was raining up! The pipes wouldn't burst because with implosion the round pipe or tube is much stronger in compression than expansion.


To solve the problem of rescue at sea, hydrogen peroxide may be of use. Before, when helicopters would hover to save lives, they would have just limited fuel, so could hover over rough seas just a while. The wise Reader's Digest has a Drama In Real Life about a helicopter out in the ocean and they couldn't hover long enough to pick up a person floating in a raft and had to go back to shore. Thank goodness they always get out of those stories safe, what a relief! Hydrogen peroxide, used in rocket fuel, and blonde bombshell's hairdos, is found in abundance in ocean water, so the idea they have is to send a tube down to the sea from the copter and the H2O2 is then used to power the motor, a rocket motor, that powers the hover for more hours, they think this may also be useful for boats at sea, especially stranded boats. Hydrogen peroxide has not found wide use in rocket engines because it's explosive, so this method would just be for emergencies, the usual power would be for more common days.
-

.
. I said to my father how time was slow when I was just a kid, I said I thought this means the saying time goes fast when you feel good is just a saying. This is why years when I was a kid seemed to last about five and my 30 year old years about a year. He said it was about fractions, when a person is one year old that birthday is all of their time on earth so they think of this as more than a 30 year wiser person whose day is not as much in hour compared to their whole life, so I was wondering with smaller and smaller change, how much till the time stops and all of us are just real smart?
.
I saw this ad today, "Unemployed?" "Dissatisfied with your present job?" This seems tough, but why both at once, more options?

Lottery Fever.
Think I'll Save Up!

I'm never serious about the lottery because if there were any real math that could win it a lot of cash and prizes for all the winners the cash would be famous, the winners may rush in and be rich and all the rest would find out, soon the lottery would be out of business. This is proof there's no big way to win the lottery. I always never win more and more I hope!! If the methods are used by some plan where they sell, it would be by definition small, and you'd never have to learn the math well to even know if you got your 10 billion%! I was talking to the president of the state lottery and he said it's for your favorite .org, a telethon to help me win more via radio!!

You may have heard about those dudes from MIT who went to Reno and won millions at 21 by way of savvy about the probabilities they had learned in college, or about that big biz from Australia that bought all the tickets in the lottery in one state so they were guaranteed to win. even so unlike winning at 21 there is no strategy involved in the lottery plan, it's complete luck. You can increase your chances up to a maximum amount, but the lottery always wins more than you. I assume the Australians that won by this massive volume way of buying all the ways to win haven't continued this plan because all the lotteries would sue them. If you really want to win the lottery, you might want to buy into competitions like the MIT Reno 21 where there is enough strategy involved to multiply it up so you always win more than you lose. Another way to boost this may be by way of software that may beam to your handheld machine while you're in the house of 21, if handheld computers defeat all humans, gambling software may be of worth too, even so this may be cheating and it would cause problems, and online gambling causes overuse for 80%. To reduce web overuse while being a real comic Click Here.


Fusion Source/Subatomic Physics Lab for a Cheap Nobel Price That Won't Cost a Lot

They now have a fusion generator that uses the implosion of opposite electric charges to then ignite fusion. They have atomic batteries that last 20 years but they are radioactive, powered by fission, but the "focus fusion" machine may be of more value than the battery if made atomic size because of much less radioactivity and more power. To allow matter to cool is a way to get heat, but to burn matter completely like via fusion releases much more heat sooner like with the older hot fusion, and like hot fusion, fewer radioactive metabolites would be left over. This is good for my health if I eat reduced heart burn dishes. I feel like I've never been in an unhealthfood store in my life! What's good about health food stores is, they never have a going out of business sale!
.
. They are using some of the science of Star trek for scotch or champaigne with no passing out. I already remembered safe booze- 99 bottles of milk on the wall, no hangover to reach the AAA of Visa in the morning!!

. Research shows that your blood pressure goes up when you talk. Reader's Digest once said, "It's good if you talk a lot.. If you let others do all the talking a while, you'll see why." This seems so to me, so I wonder what happens to your blood pressure when others are talking, it may be of value to find out. In moderation it's good but many poeple like to raise blood pressure. Where the blood pressure is low it may be of value, for people with high blood pressure it may be of worth to talk with more level height.
.

.
I saw this site that advertised good vision-it was so fuzzy it improved mine in the audio infomercial!!

What is October 31? When the dead try to EEEK out the living!

-
Dear Amy;

Thanks for your aid. I used to type in on an old typewriter when I would write songs. I was listening to a song on the radio this AM so old I unheard this song since before I was born. My mother used to jump around and dance when I would listen in! They think they found a real image of Will that old author of 1600, well actually of Chugalug Booze! If you're a computer person, why go to to Arbys, you could eat cheap right out in the box! Did you hear the news, they found Tut's tomb just 30 feet from where he was, his name may be Tut Tut.. (He was found in 1922 is how I remember). This Tut slept through the Ancient age, the 13, 14 and 15 Hundreds, and most of the Price is Right! An action reality series, I'm better off than he was when I was his age! And they were thinking of a Reality TV sort of The Beverly Hillbillies remake, I saw they were real when I was Unwired by remmote control ! Thanks for wearing straw hats, a straw hat is always made of straw, so genuine!

Yours, Me

.....

MANY AND ONE

The two most general types of extremes possible in life are, extreme change or extreme lack of change. Extremes are sort of a life of all one blob of oneness or many random particles. The all one has too much oneness and the other to much of the many, they are neither about heavan or life, neither may have ever existed because all we find in the cosmos has both. Since all has both, this leads to a way to classify all the sets in the cosmos and math by what changes and what stays the same. The set theory of math is sort of an atomic theory of math, with a few most general sorts of transformations. This idea of the "more things change the more they stay the same" is more like an energy conservation theory of math, because it's based on energy conservation also. Energy conservation is about action reaction pairs to balance the power. If the pairs were exactly the same they would be in perfect balance and all motion in the cosmos would stop. So to keep the cosmos in motion there is a balance between change and rest. This is also the balance between motion and rest, or between balance of the many like the + and - of lots of electricity and masses that unify by gravity. With the exception of wars and horseshoes we may win a few, and lose a few (some things we must win more). The one earth is more at rest, many orbits of the three moons of the earth astronomers have have found are in motion.

It says on dreamprophesy.com you actually burn more fat sleeping than watching TV. I just watch exercise shows!
....


I saw this army ad, on the other page from the blurb it has a close up of an exquisite ladies face, named Susan Powell. I'd know her anywhere, she's in Marge Smith's Real Name family!

They find in research that Boston is the unsoberest town, but how could it stagger if the limit was out?

Cows "Moo" with accent, farmer's say. They think the cows find the slang from the farmers! There's no accent in the US Moos and World Report!

They have the giant offshore oil well in the Hibernia oil field of the coast of Canada, it's made of millions of tons of concrete with big teeth that would stop icebergs. This reminds me of another engineering marvel, the tower with elevator to orbit first invented in the 1900's or so by inventors like Goddard and Tsiolokvsky, and in consideration throughout the 20th century till now by others. The plan they've thought of to stop such as satellites from hitting it if ever built is to move it around and dodge the stuff up there in orbit at high speed on an hour to hour basis. The oil drill is not cheap, so another type of oil well has been invented that moves like the tower and lets the ice sail on through, and the moves back to where the drill was before the iceburg. It would have connections that could easily lock and unlock on the ocean floor, and there would be a smooth shield to cover the base of the machine if the iceburg hit the floor and the floor of the ocean both. They say if they have to wait a while for ice to go the drill could go to other second rate wells with no drills on top to drill while the iceberg goes past, saving lots of cash and oil if the field has more oil. This way we can change the oil and save the ocean!
..
...

FAMOUS COMIC OUTVENTIONS

I was reading about how they tried to invent the flying SUV in the 50's, so the family wouldn't have to forsake the comforts of the lemon or bomb while in the air. How would you pull over to the side of the road if you wanted to stop and talk on the cell?

And Buckminster Fuller invented the three wheel van with a top speed of 120 mph-and this was just while in the lot! He was praised for removing a wheel, praise me if I multiply much!

What stopped the zeppelins in May 6, 1937 was the Hindenburg's crash. They say a theory about this is static ignited the envelope's canvas that had compounds that caused the explosion. Airplanes in the uberall were faster and cheaper, and Zepplens were halted by more than sticker shock with all the airships plants bombed in WW II.

The car boat would have set sail from the port and they eliminate the headache of towing a boat to it's launch site. "Few people would want to sacrifice the convenience of a real Mazda or a boat for the merits of Davy Jones's convertable" I've read inventors at http://www.boxtops/ have already solved this with a power trailer. The pilot climbs up in the boat and it unhitches from the van and it rolls to the water by cyber guidance. When the boat drives up to the parking slosh it fits in the trailer and hitches well.

The flying platform was an upside down helicopter you'd just stand on but it wasn't so stationary, helicopters now may zoom upside down when they couldn't achieve it till the 1980's, landing was the the best part, if you were right side up!

The atomic powered plane would have had 100 tons of lead shielding, the radiation would have lifted us higher- to the moon and stars!

About the atomic Edsil, the sound machine would have been a loud boom box.


ALSO KNOWN AS

How many Beatles were in the Fab Four? I asked and they said, "Not 1492!"

Where was the film, Pirates of the Carribbean? I asked and they said, "The cinema!"

When my computer is running slow, this is when I learn about computers. While I wait about each step I think by memorization about that or anything of value to learn. While it says control panel, I repeat a few times, "Controls functionality of My Computer" "Reboot Word Pad", "Reboot Undo", "Reboot Reboot!" (Once my machine is up a bit I have to boot it up more to just stop!)

..
.

When Opthomologists Biz Is Zooming.....

..
. Lenses worn like a movie star have been devised that use the change in electric fields inside the lense that change the refraction of the light so it can focus real fast, autozoom opticians. The wearer would be able to see far and near with sharp vision, good for bifocals or even image stabilized movies, and you're the sound surround..

The old talking movies were good for sleep. When I was a kid I had to sit for hours through old westerns, we'd listen for hours while 29 horses would say asian gossip!

I may never leave. You'll always find me no matter what right here typing away at www.authors afterlife dotcom!
...

Computers, How to Reduce Overuse (Research Shows It's Like Ouch! Gambling..)

Are you calm and love your yawns? Perhaps it's optimal to let your brain rest so you can consolidate memories. If the machine may not be giving you rest, you may find the methods on this site a solution of worth..

The Cliff's Notes; My best solution of all on this page I've tried is to just let your machine crash eventually and use other machines like at your college like I am now and this is a good option. This is great for high speed stuff. See below "The Blessings of R and D With Neighbors" If this option isn't of worth to your site and situation, there are lots of other tricks I list here I tried before this that you might try in combinations to optimize, CLICK GOOD OPTION NO LINK.


For portable devices, a good trick is to put your machine in a (small) box with a timer lock to schedule appointments with the machine. This is feasable now for you without waiting for the more fancy machines I mention herein that heat or shake your hand to stop. I use a cheaper email machine, not the darn web cellphones. As I say slow modems are a major part of the problem with the web, creating randomness like gambling behaviour. They may soon have higher speed downloads but if you have been in woe with the web I recomend turning down this option, which can cost 1000 a year in service contracts. It has bad habits you're more at risk for. I always just remember my disgust at overuse as my inspiration. Like most I was given no warning. And these methods really do well, even so it's important to never go back to it. Did you know most secretaries read email 40 times an hour? Two thirds of video gamblers overuse, and so on. All this may seem a problem, but this may also be a great business opportunity as I say below! As bad as these problems are, imagine how much better you could make millions feel by solving for AHH. They're not dummies, they're computerized to a higher level IF WE HELP!



(I'm thinking of a more advanced method that you also put your tower and monitor in a box with a timer lock that no one can access at the wrong time not even U boats or the usb sub teacher in college. If you would like to help me in this business, your donations are welcome. I have many other ideas for innovation, please call 276 228 3465. I'm willing to allow others to pay for patents of my inventions if the person investing capital sign a simple document agreeing to pay a percentage of the profits to both me and you. All you do is pay the USPTO (not me) and sign me for a percent. I've invented thousands of inventions, and this may be a far more profitable investment than most stocks. Inventors are optimists research shows, after all they are often rich and help others often more than anyone. To read good times are returning and realize they never even left!)


The rest of this page is about older methods that while not as good as the above, may be of worth to you in combination if the above aren't enough for more severe cure. Research shows the way overuse behavior like gambling is made more definite is via randomness, this reinforces the overuse behavior. So if you are overcomputing and you'd like to slow this up, reduction is often achieved by doing what's more predictable. High speed helps a lot. If the machine seems a bit implosive, take heart. I've found many practical steps and tricks I list here I have devised you can take to reduce the overuse to a more moderate moderation before the computer causes harm to relationships, eyes or wrists.


WHAT'S A Good WAY TO REDUCE OVERUSE?

One of the best I've found in 4 years of use is a low sigh solution! A heater you plug in your power strip with your machine, to start or stop your machine you always have to on the heat which will remind you in an hour to stop with gradual awareness. This is simple so unlike fighting the web with the web you don't have more problems, timers you see that just cut off the site and you wait are both random and more of the problem and they're so sudden I would just ignore them in awhile with the web slowing down my reflexes as if in sleep. Same for songs which didn't boost my anti web awareness much I had no reaction in two or three minutes of it. With the heat timer method you will have regular rest between other achievements and real dreams will revive. I was trying to invent a hat that shakes my brain to make me aware and wise, washing hair is a brain wave 24/7!

To improve efficiency, a cheap thermometer and preheat to the right temperature is a way to allow more resolution if you estimate how much computation it will take to find the answer or solve the problem on the web and then you wait till the heater is where it's optimal for the bet with practice. For portable machines heaters that are a bit too hot built in may be with the same trick; if you can't hold it you can't compute.

This general idea is much like the inventions for drivers when they shake awake by the cushion, except this needs to be more gradual, audio clips of more and more urgency combined with an auto off at the finish and some shaking with either a cushion or a shoulder cushion would help too (too much shaking or heat may be harmful, so smaller doses of both combined may be best..If you have leg or other circulatory problems like diabetes, Caution is advised. Keep the heater away from your legs can cause burns. If you have problems like heat stroke a fan may be better to use for the timer, or if you have risk of hypothermia the heat to your chest may be better. Other timers of your own based on this principle may work just as well. See my Disclaimer.). Though this is for information only and not medical advice, if the heater heats too fast the heater more to my face for moderate discomfort, then a fan to cool my web use to cooler than a bit comfortable will allow a complete hot and cool cycle which has been shown to boost immunity (probably because we lived by the shore in the tropics like most people now for millions of years before the invention of fire, so all day in the heat we may have been in and out of the waves.). The cycles are twice the time and it's not so hot you get tired of this fast. A fan will cool you more than you need without AC even on the most hot days in the heat where I am on the US E coast, if you know much about fans in summer you may say they're better than AC at close range, often I wear long thin pants with the fan to not be too cold, and with shorts it's too cold and more of my outfit moderates the fan. Also to speed up the web cycle, move nearer the fan or heat, to slow it down, move away. If you make the whole web session mild then moderately uncomfortable, you'll stay in moderation if you also do reps of other than what the discomfort is reminding you of in words and prayer while you do the web, combining this with the other methods of this site will win for you. If the fan is not cool enough, it's good to spray water on your arms legs and face. You want to shock yourself awake. Another good trick after you surf the web in the heat is to use the fan lying down and tell yourself how much good the air feels, how bad the web is, and with stevia (no calorie sweetener from the Amazon) in jug of water, good music or so on away from the web. When it's the best time to stop the web in the heat my prayer is "Time to stop the web so no more of this sweltering heat, it will be such a relief to feel not so hot and do other than the web like other's want so I can do my best for the world" and so on. I would use the general circuit of the fuse box to turn off so the only way to turn the web back on is both the heater and the computer at the same time. My fuse box has no fuses it's failsafe 10,000 months!

Although it's good to have a general baseline room temperature like in the winter and then add the heater machine to be exact, oil type or radiant portable heaters may seem the most optimal for the zeroing in because they heat slowly and gradually. Even so the blast from an air type heater while much more noticable is still gradual. Combining these methods with an (electric) oil filled space heater (that looks like an old steam radiant room heater piped in except with no pipes) is great for computation while I type, like, ya know write at this moment! It costs about 25 a month and takes a while to heat up, but it's a deep radiant heat that goes deeper in. Being higher up, the heaters of this sort are easier to reach the on off, and safer than ceramic heaters. An oil electric radiant heater may actually be best because it's radiant to warm you deep so you don't have risk dropping the heater to blast your face if you just turn it on when you type in the web. I was always wary about using the heater by accident overnight, with oil heat this is more safe. An oil heater costs about 40 dollars, and it has a more elaborate thermostat than cheaper heaters for moderation. Even while it's safer it has a caution light, and it's possible at too high temperature it would burn out the thermostat and start. Thus it's best to keep the settings moderate. In an hour or two it's a bit too warm and because it's safer than a fan heater you can "leave it on more often", and you can thus make the computer realm as uncomfortable as you like, reminding you to automatically take breaks, this may be a lot more valorious (and worthwhile, and famous, two out a three the best..) than either no web use or without any rest, the rest once an hour may be the best, leaving the web realm and return without discomfort for say 15 minutes at a time. With the oil heater on more often with safety not so much an issue there's no need to plug in and out the heater with each bootup. I was using the anti fuse box and this turned the other power off like in my other rooms when of worth, so the plug out method is not as worthwhile as the oil heater method. Another advantage of an oil heater is no dry eye, and it's not loud so you can hear your feline muffy sing in a sound proof booth!

To save on the heater I recommend moisture wicking underwear, no swimwear, swimwear is cheaper!

"Who wrote that volume about alarms?"

"I don't know but her name rings a bell!"


"Did you read that memo about alarms?"

"No but I'll be sure when I wake up!"

Many people I've talked to (millions I'm sure they know much about AR!) my boss, my sister, my cohorts say they are concerned about web overclocking, it's considered a major problem by insiders in the IT industry, and it would have seemed easy for the wealthy to just pay a web voice portal where they do the search for a fee, but this is not the golden rule and if all the bosses are without the web problems of overuse and randomness by putting more strain on the IT world and employees, the rich will be richer and the poor poorer because of it, so web overuse with more time may be bad for most, if machines like the above of my own to limit its burden aren't also invented and developed, a spill proof coffee cup for Mazda's could save lives so merely just moist at 55 mph.

One of the main problems with web overuse is you brain needs a rest to process memories and other computation of it's own, and research shows computers if are too constant (without an oil heater built in!) this will tire your brain. Click here for more.

Most with computers may have dry eye and though a heater or fan isn't so good for this, the solution may be the oil heater and or by keeping your eyes hydrated by common methods like omega oils before each web use, low viscosity omega oils both moisturize and reduce the inflammation that dry eye often has and they are also somewhat fuzzy to see the computer with so they're a good reminder how good it feels to have eye relief and at the same time to not just ignore eye pain because it takes a bit more eye labor to see the type on the machine. Many people have eye pain for months before they realize it's the machine but cheer up, in Miami Beach all the wardrobe they own is swimwear! R and R is ahead and a month of Miami Beach for you I hope I save a lot on heat at christmas with a ship, how? To reach Miami Beach! See also my Eyesite link below or the list at left.

HERBS FOR MORE IMMEDIATE RELIEF

Another good trick to shock yourself awake is by using an Omega 3 oil, like pumpkin oil in your eye, pumpkin oil flows smoother than an oil like vitamin E so your eyes are more comfortable, even though the screen is more blurry all day, this both makes it more memorable to quit the computer because you can't see it as well while also much soothing and saving your eyes! I feel grateful and better so I stop more often, if incentive and the boss firing doesn't help, motivation like being in comfort helps too! I consider web overuse to be a sort of daytime insomnia, and sooth (reducing) the probability of overuse by replacing the randomness of uploads (50% of us have slowband and I think this may be better because if you don't know where you're going you want to slow down and not go so fast, you may arrive nowhere at high speed.). To overpower the machine small daytime doses of herbs like ginger or melatonin may add more yet to your dreams not being HTML. Combining this with prayer may help too.

Ginger (as in ginger snaps and the common cooking herb) works well because it helps you relax 7 ways and if used around your eyes (I use my eyebrows or under my pearl Visions so the ginger is out of my eyes by gravity) ginger is a muscle relaxant and helps your eyes not over grip the muscles causing headaches for faster relief. Ginger is cheap, a dollars worth of ginger from the supermarket will last more than a year..

Stevia the sweetener is of worth, it's so sweet you don't think of the web and you'll have sweet dreams all through the FM. If it's strong enough where I've lost 30 pounds it has real worth even for cyber randomness... There has never been a single adverse event reported for stevia, Japan consumes 20 tons of stevia a year. If my radio dish has 257 stations at Zha Zha's room so be it! Even so like my sister says if stevia's not for you, another o calorie 0 carbohydrate, real sweet herb with no side effects is the Chinese herb lo han. (This is not medical advice. See my disclaimer.)

MORE WAYS TO REDUCE AND STAY FIT; After Dumbness Not BC Before Cyber. These are not as good as the shake awake machine, above, even so you may find them of worth. I list them here for more options and improvements. Though these are more complex and less powerful they have considerable power too.

One of the best I've achieved yet in lots of combinations and research is COMBINING THESE HERBS AND HEAT WITH PRAYER AND THE A Z DOCUMENTS (TOOLBOXES) about the blessing of rest and eye salvation. (How to make or find your own Jokes With The Toolbox Click here for the Comedy Machine, this is one of the best ways to reduce web overuse).

. . A toolbox is one of my inventions where Cut and Paste documents are from the web into the AZ memo, stored on your desktop and in a G byte chip so you always have reduced risk of memory loss to the outside USB port, (this reduces stress and thus risk of overuse) and by making it so you can find what you've done months or years before and not have to wade through it twice, and also by allowing you to stop anytime by listing your current place and comments with the URL. It's expert advice, condensed and saves you time and adds to the life of your machine.

If you fail at first don't give up, you'll be able to combine methods like this that combine well (e.g. water) to overpower it. See web sites about relaxation.

Another general way I've used to achieve web triumph is to stop all computing till as late in the day as possible (I tried just stopping the ISP this is too drastic) and then compute only as much as needed and then sleep either on my own or with the melatonin sometimes to stay in the general area of cyber salvation. And this in downsized power is also of worth, by stopping in general before you continue too much with each search you control the rest of the tricks the computer would try, out of web, into your life you jog! So if you have to do some web memos early in the day, meditate before you start each search? Is it a waste of time? The control of each session is not as good as saying no till the afternoon, but it's better than no realization that this is a powerful way to reduce it. Remember you can not only control each login, you can also control at most uploads, if you realize the best ore is there to mine, and your boss' praise. Think of the uploads as a path that may lead you higher or lower, your best wager if or when you have to start earlier in the PM is to place the emphasis on the start of the session and the start of uploads, and so on. It's of worth to pray about these most important times, dream of triumph, no prayer is one week of 7 days.

Another good trick for uploads is to close your eyes and count your breath, Like 1 and 2 and 3. This may help, and singing your favorite tunes with words of prayers like to stop the machine altogether, if the song is going around between your cup of bouffant like a genuine ancient 70's 8 track smash! Combine two or three of these tricks you will find is effective especially over time as you build up more and more defence as you may realize and may save you heartburn no doubt.

High speed internet like at the college where I'm so smart wherever I am now is a great way to reduce computer stress, the old saw was that if you have a slow computer it will slowly drive you wild, and this can be a major source of computer strain and thus increase your chance of overuse. Using a library computer not only limits your use if you find a moderately rich town, it also speeds up your uploads of course. But it also stops two major sources of computer worry, security and making safety copies of your labors. To save my site to the disc just took about an hour not 20, so you see what I'm saying, your hearing is great!

The Blessings of R and D with Neighbors

A good general plan is to wait till your machine crashes and then going to your local college to type online.. This is the method that's worked best for me. If you notice you're overusing your machine, start to pray, and sooner or later your machine will fail. At this time tell yourself even though the machine is good for many uses also note how disgusted you are with the overuse and I've vowed to only type in college here with no exceptions for indefinitely. I had to use my machine for health at the time but it's much better now without too much, feels mucho! I live near a college and it's good to climb the hill for exercise, and seeing my sweet neighbors is a great brain energy boost like none other. You'll save on that darn ISP, "Remember that 20 you owe me?" "No I will eventally, don't worry!" And your web life is secure and sound, when you type in a college mainframe and this makes your web surfing more moderate, your brain rests to consolidate memories, and your eyes are at rest. Research shows you're ten times safer in a neighborhood where neighbors try to help. Remember you can load in word processing document to the Gbit drive (not the Act as Save as if to file Mayvember 35th, updated for the oos!) and then type in to the college machine. All my important documents are in AZ memos, so I have about 90 of these and just a few programs on my machine and it's secure it's in your G. You automatically can rest from the machine at least two days a week plus holidays for many local colleges or other libraries and I'm just typing a few hours when I'm actually at the machine. Notes in a book are a good way to do this so you can choose your best to type and you have a hard copy. This is said to be the most undocumented age in history, no one writes so much as before. And the air conditioning and heat in winter at the college where I type make a good gradual timer, as above.

If like me you make your own pretty cool website, it seems obvious to ask, "how am I doing" and then as you learn more about this you type in sites to find how you are doing, this seems good till you find it's quite habit forming. Never had this happen with a book. It seemed wasteful of both my eyes and time.Wasted time is by definition doing something without much change for the better. The reason typing in your own site is catchy is because it's personal and it's random, sure I did thus well, I reached the top of the search, then, I find suprise, this site wasn't listed, now it is. This is actually a way to try to instill order over the web randomness which seems natural enough with more randomness of other sites than your own, even so for mostly wasteful loops like this, the power to simply click on more fun sites you like at the time the loop is being used in your favor (it stimulates your life) is a good trick once the main discomfort of using the web is past. Recreational reading has been at lower ebb and this is considered to be bad in general experts say, like "bad for health" and the web may be the real culprit, worse than the old idiot box till we use methods like the heat for a timer. When the idiot loops start, typing in more recreational site may be a great solution. The best method in general is to reduce overuse by methods like the timer above, any larger block of time on the computer with not so much worth is important to reduce with R and R! Once I stopped in general with a reliable method and this being most important to solve, it was worthwhile to go on improving, if you find time being wasted with less worthwhile activities (like loops) the best solution is to click on websites like Yahoo Oddly Enough, or I use comic sites and sites like New Scientist any site that you find fascinating especially with updates. I had the opportunity to use a Blackberry and it didn't operate, I think it was a real blessing because experts say we have an artificial sense of urgency caused by cyber machines all around. Solving web overuse has been a great relief for me. If you see how the web is already enough to control, saying no to other machines and using the web more efficiently may have much impact on your life or even life events.

OTHER WAYS TO REDUCE RANDOMNESS

A.DOWNLOADING TRICKS/SLOW MODEM

As I say below a slow modem may be best (not high speed, I don't envy web users have this "luxury") for web overuse because it slows down the problem at the source, randomness. Even so the timing of the download from the web is random, complete with a buildup of the random widgets that try to tell you how the upload is going, building up expectation. To reduce this randomness, I look away to the side of the monitor so all the advanced widgets are out of "site", and when it's almost uploaded I just look in the general direction of the monitor, you can be in the general area of the finish of the upload just by seeing the lights out of the corner of your eye, otherwise you always get a jolt you won't have so much by this method. To stop the annoying timer lower right, upload bar, click view (upper left) and then click status bar. It's also good to watch the realm of the page that is unchanged (like File Edit View, and then make up jokes by rearranging the letters of the words as I say how on My Comedy Machine page. The Fab Four were not the Fib Four, they would be the Fib 3!) Or post a Post It on the tube and make more comics here.

~~~~~~

Another good trick for slow uploads in general is to find something good or awesome to read, perhaps a memo by a brilliant author about a skill you always wanted to learn. This fills up the upload with something both complex and real instead of the empty randomness of gizmos.

COUNTING WIDGETS, AND SLOWING UP FOR COMPLEX SITES, WORD PROCESSING, and DISTANT EMAIL SITES To REDUCE RANDOMNESS

Regularity is the opposite of randomness. So if you have regular uploading to do and like me are without a high speed and like to rest, you can make your upload with reduced randomness by familiarizing. Say you have to click a link on an A-Z index and it's the 20th down the list with the upload to reach your site. You note that it's also about an inch or two from the A on the list, and that it's between two words Ba and Ca on the memo. You can make it more nonrandom by memorizing what it is in more than one motif. In memory if you look at the motif in more than one way, you can proofread your work without having to go back and just see one way to remember. In life before computers there was more than one way to remember, experts like Amy (hey we know her, I read a lot!) say to remember by five ways is better than just one, words, music, written words, or via the image. A good way to go in general is to count the unchanging widgets or other names and motifs and then give them names, sort of marking out your turf. When you repeat these motifs when you otherwise would be with more randomness, it's more soothing.

...

Another trick to reduce randomness is about websites. For business you type in the site and often it seems it has a whole world of new options (and randomness). While this may be a jolt it often has too many options. To reduce randomness, it's good if you use the web for business no more than most needed. Even so there are sites you must visit. Mail order is drying up so if you had to do business by the post it may be more necessary to do the web. To reduce business website randomness a good method is to slow down and do it step by step. Be ready to read some a while and then rest and consider, then repeat, like climbing a hill and taking a rest so it's in reach to climb it even if steep. This can make it so you win where you would lose the claim you otherwise would make of getting stronger not weaker about sites with lots of options. With the web as it is here in 2008, one thing is guaranteed, web failures on a regular schedule. To prevent crashes use the system restore feature of your machine in Start, as you may know it rewinds your settings where you may have pressed the wrong tab by accident or loaded bad software, rewinding to say a week before this, this has made it so I haven't had to have my machine serviced in 5 years, saving a lot of chips, so no crashes, this stops the problem of the threat of meltdown, a cause of randomness in the sense of risk of loss.

For data salvation an important cause of cyber edginess, as I say above a good trick is to use the G byte chips you can buy for 10 from Walmart, these store a lot more than a floppy and it's like holding months of lite data in your hands energising up in the air. There are the worthy successors of the floppy and they won't wear out since there is no hardware so much, plug in your USB and your risk of losing your most worthwhile memories are saved. Floppies are no more and and while I won't be able to say so, these may actually be in use for 100's of years!

Word processing is more reliable and is of reduced randomness offline instead of the web, so it's good to do word processing offline as often as possible when I have the option. Another good way to reduce website randomness when used for business is just to find the 800 number right away and call the site, it's much faster and simpler.

To reduce random emails a good method is to go to a distant program, sign up there and use this for all your important correspondence, junk is of more worth here to stop too. If there's some memo that's a distraction if it's on your main site you use to access the web when you load up this is more random. When you move the email to the distant site this makes it more like real memos you got in the aluminum Christmas box because it's not there to surprise you with randomness. It should be your option to read what you want, if you allow too much convenience of your access to it, you're also allowing others the option to surprise you and hold you hostage to surprises like spam that are not always pleasant. I use gmx.com it's free and you can send large files to your giant muffy the feline who ate the rug!

To stop all spam, I use a second email or more in the distant account, before sending a message to anyone I consider they may soon return to me with a discussion of their point of view, and you may naturally feel the need to type in return, and they may continue indefinitely, a sort of time spam that you may want to seal in their own box you can still reach when you feel the urge. If you feel uncomfortable and you like your reader/author (so high speed!) this is a good ruse. For spam the best where they try to use your web name to fill your spam box with fat, if anyone you don't know asks for your email or you're a bit wary, just list the email in your other box, so if they just hope to make your VISA sing, you have signed up and no harm no F+ in Mail Order business degrees 4 Us! If you would stop even a loved one from somewhat wasting your hours, why not help trim others like businesses that pretend (with a picture of a small pig (spells spam filters) to offer stuff like MP3 uploads for musicians on the web, with no options to earn the MP3 other than one (no, two sites). Then if you lend them your name they load your box with spam, a sort of bait and switch. You can still find your mom's letters in the search, on the distant site like GMX even so. The best long term solution is a spam box to make the flowers bloom, inedible horticulture is above!

For realtors (who sell lots at lawn sales like my Site Manager Ronnie R Realtor!!) and must see business zooms and relatives my goal as with Cool Savings and the rest of this page, stopping the general flow at the cause is one of the best defences. Your post office box has the right level of stress, more than a boxful may make you rich if you use your be rich slow box at the right rate even so it should be your option how rich you want to be in general..

As I say about my usual web or other cyber use because of the randomness, a good way is to stay away from most other web activities especially the more random sites or the light show with sound of the music machine, and a good method of reducing randomness is to just use the the zoom show, on a month then off. To overpower a force you must balance it with at least as much opposite force and detour the activity often. While the web takes labor to counterbalance we may still achieve moderation offline with greater ease. If the web was invented in 1970 we will have more Before Cyber history. A good way is to alternate more predictable motifs with other sorts of activities, I highly recommend speech to text software to "cross train" and to rest your eyes if you must compute, not using the same part of your brain, the visual only, to give your visual brain more rest. You can get good used text to speech cheap online for just 25 like at Amazon ar at a site like Natural Reader free. (A good trick to find software like this is to search by typing in "freeware", or using Yahoo Answers, with top Answers voted for the the best need, this is good for practical answers and sites like epinions or Bizrate are just as good for finding the best for your money in like vitamins or products, and so on.) For twxt to speech the computer reads the words on the page out loud through the headphones to you! The main problems are that the text to speech takes a long time to load up at startup if you use a PC, and some pages seemed to be almost impossible to highlight the text to read, a common problem. To solve the startup problem, I just use the software at the times to read when it's optimal and don't load at startup by the option offered. To solve the highlight problem which is a seemingly impossible feat for some annoying sites like Adobe PDF, it seems impossible by clicking the mouse (worse) or shift and the down arrow (better) or you have to wait 5 if it selects at all. My clever solution to reinstate text to speech for the afterlife is; just hit select and copy the page into wordpad or outlook ect. then you can easily highlight it with your mouse! And you have a copy of the page if you want to save it! One thing that's good about the text to speech software motif is, it's regular. And it's great for proofreading what you type, you easily find spelling errors PLUS grammar and content errors spell checks miss, and it's great to listen to a site you've edited well, a web labor well done. Another good solution as I say about this option is to just drive or walk to your local college and high speed is higher learning. See Above, The Blessing Of R and D With Neighbors. If some seem to say I'm god's present to the women of this world, they're sweet.

My Advice to WWW Autoors

My mother the English PhD Journalist author says she hates web writing and she is not alone. The best solution I've seen is a sound solution! If your editor will allow you may find audio authorship a great relief from all the tedious editing! I use it to find great relief from being amazing, what else, well rich, might be! The two programs I've found at no cost, are Audacity a popular audio editing software, and Limewire, a site to store and share my audios online, this is at no cost and it's 5 times easier than tedious typing. (the search is "file hosting sites").Your audience will understand you a lot faster, so more clicks, and you can write more often with much reduced discomfort. I still like to edit for sites like this and my machine will only save about 100 posts before it will slow down, my solution is to buy the 4G chips with the USB and store the audios outside my computer here to then take up to my local college for a fast upload to the site. My 57K modem would take 30 minutes otherwise for a 10 minute post, and this would reduce my computer use in the winter when the weather is bad who knows to reach the college. Thus I've opted in for a hybrid method, half audio and half typing, even so real relief... For agility and a reliable document I record on old fashioned cassettes and this allows better comprehension so it's more pleasure to add in comedy and interesting notes to have higher speed awareness not found with slow drudgery of typing alone. All my idea is saved offline when I dream of the memo while I wait to go to the big machine on other days than colege hours, holidays are a good rest.

WHAT'S AHEAD, 2057BC THE ZOOM!

It would seem the makers of the web and other machines, selling what is by definition an information product, should have made the machine not harmful to the consumer. This about randomness was my own discovery where I connected this about computers and gambling behaviour while reading a commercial about behavioural psychology (1800 TEACH), so this has not been widely known, now that seems probable this is true, there may be lawsuits because this is big business, and millions may actually profit from the mistake while helping hundreds of millions of other consumers. Other than software to rewire the person's computer use back to health, all that's available to buy in 2009 are timers or glorified timers, software like this may be a great solution for numerous types of overuse behaviour, especially combined with other methods. Research shows the web is often more addictive than drugs or alcohol. Want to be rich, this may be good for most if some may. Or "moist" if no rain coat causes rain, and causes shade and sweet or cute conversations with sweet beauticians! We might support legislation or financial incentives to downsize the randomness, and software engineers also may win a fortune improving the machines with reliability in mind. It's been said the web and other machines like it are like the early days of airplanes with lots of improvisation so no problems there, even so like with the typewriters and ASDF which is not most efficient for the frequency of the alphabet, there was so much memory to stay with it the ASDF is the same. This means even with how much randomness there is, with a web like the proposed Internet II or higher in online if we went in the health food store and lived to be 1000 so be it!...

Here's My Own.

Computer EyeSight with special exercises and tips just for cyber brains like me and you.

~DISCLAIMER~

-Copyright 2007-2008 by Charles Frederick Lawson-