Considerations About How Improved Habitability of Mars Might be Achieved

Here I wanted to say some more than my video and elaborate a bit more about my idea of hopefully colonizing and terraforming Mars in just years instead of centuries by spearing or putting a magnetic bubble around the side of Callisto, one of the large satellites of Jupiter. The magnetic bubble  would then react with Jupiter's strong field with a force outward and then on in a more linear future path to Mars at minimal cost for using this for the advantage of mankind. This would double the land area that we can live on in just a few years, not centuries.

 Here we would crash Callisto into Mars rapidly giving Mars a more breathable atmosphere,
pressure by this atmosphere, warmth and heat by the pressure, and also by crashing other asteroids into Mars with the right profile we might get more ideal minerals and materials for the soil that we would add on Mars by this method. In addition this would  have the advantage of a denser atmosphere which would help shield the future dwellers of Mars from harmful cosmic rays and radiation from the sun.

Elon Musk has believed that we would simply crash near Earth asteroids into the pole of Mars melting the ice and giving oxygen and water to Mars and perhaps heat.

 I had read and been taught this won't work because it will take 10 million comets and comments on Reddit! to change much.

 Lots of comets or asteroids would need many machines and be  more complex also and leave us with lots of poison and radioactive soil and Co2 and it would still be cold. (This is the reason I think we see craters in the images by the ancient flowing channels because the water stayed liquid under the pressure only for a brief time in the history of Mars and this is also why we don't find evidence of life on Mars.  Carl Sagan holds that the water probably isn't gone and is instead sealed in the ice caps, even so I think it's possible pressure not heat is why there was liquid water on Mars and this is why it was for such a brief time. Mars isn't able to sustain life because of the low gravity which doesn't have enough pressure to hold liquid water. Even so due to the low gravity I believe that there may be a large area where liquid water can exist inside Mars like in subterranean channels that might actually have life or have had it. When you go down a hundred feet inside the crust of the Earth the temperature goes up one degree, so it rapidly gets hot but with lower gravity inside of Mars there may be a much larger area where liquid water  exists in flowing channels. If as in the history of Mars there's not enough gravity for liquid water on the surface to exist for long, I think it's possible we might be able to dig large radial tunnels down to the center of Mars and increase the gravity by taking the metals from these tunnels and compressing them with fusion machines which are now almost viable. This would make them so dense  the gravity of Mars would be increased enough to hold liquid water and an atmosphere. In addition these tunnels would give us additional room to live inside of Mars. To dig them might be a lot easier than it might seem because if we had fusion power machines and the low gravity inside of Mars to start with it will be much easier to dig tunnels to the center of Mars for this purpose. Another good use of fusion might be to add on a synthetic form of soil so that we're not just living on a surface of metal or other soil that wouldn't be as healthy. This might be in our reach as well as the machines to both synthesize and disperse the soil by the new improvements about fusion power.) Blasting Mars with a larger impactor would give more heat and cleanse away more of the crust which is actually radioactive several feet down. Unlike using lots of comets my plan would change Mars to our advantage fast in a simple way.

Engineering an impactor might even help us better simulate how the protomoon hit the Earth, and improve our ideas about the formation and evolution of other solar systems.

 Originally I thought of this about using a satellite of Jupiter to improve our ability to colonize Mars as a good idea. However by more research I realized there were two other problems. One is about the radioactivity (because of Jupiter) of the water of some of the moons of Jupiter,  and the other problem as I will discuss and also for reasons I will  discount below, is  about the possibility of bad actors using this method to use an impactor to cause us harm..(this would not be a problem because it would take far too long for them to do so because the huge distance a presumed impactor or would have to travel to reach us and we would have advanced warning and be able to take action, by future methods like the DART asteroid deflector mission or many other methods to move asteroids that are being considered.)

 The four main satellites of Jupiter are  Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto. The first three Io, Europa, and Ganymede unlike Callisto, are under the influence of Jupiter's high energy radiation belt with radioactivity around it.

 Originally I thought we might have used a large satellite like Ganymede, or perhaps  Europa to crash into Mars and give us a new world to live in.

 First of all I ruled out using Io, the innermost large satellite of Jupiter for this plan because Io has a lot of sulfur volcanoes, and it's believed to have a vast ocean of molten sulfur inside which we wouldn't get much use of if we crash it into Mars since it would radiate out into an atmosphere. In addition, I think Io the first satellite of Jupiter also may be directly involved with solar storms because there's a large amount of sulfur in a torus around Jupiter in Io's orbit.

 I believe this may have major influence on solar weather and our risk of being hit by plasmas from the sun because the sun spots actually go in 22 years cycles and Jupiter's orbit is 11 years in period and so I think it's a resonance of Io's procession around Jupiter that changes the angle from the North magnetic pole of the Torus to the South Pole and reverses the polarity of the sun spots, also explaining why the sun gets hotter on the outside than inside. By this, Jupiter would be drawing off the plasma from the Sun by its stronger magnetic field from the side. Jupiter has a magnetic field of about 100 Gauss while the Sun has only about half a Gauss.

 The 22 year resonance of the Sunspot cycle by complete reversal from pole to pole might help us predict when the solar plasmas were headed to us.

 The sun spots also may have influence on biology because e.g. the tree rings by the evidence of dendrochronology also resonate in the 11-year cycle.

 This is one of the theories of the stock markets that it has 11 year oscillations and there is some evidence for this. If so the solar influence of the precession of Io may influence our behavior in a general way. After all the brain is based on electrical signals and how those signals change by way of a change in the components of the radiation from the sun, may be a good reason not to change Io.

 Thus we might consider some of the other Galilean satellites of Jupiter, for example Ganymede which has a relatively smooth surface.

 One question I asked is about the probability of life inside of Europe which many believe is possible because there's a large ocean inside of it (known from general density by gravity), and presumably geothermal heating by the sloshing of the tides to power the life.

 It's believed that the fault lines on Europa are based on a sort of tectonic circulation of the ice continually flowing up to the surface and circulating back down by way of the flow. So here I asked the question... if there's a lot of radioactivity of Jupiter because Ganymede and Europa are both inside the radioactive belt of Jupiter, it seemed possible that the circulation of the ice and water down into the ocean of these planets would make the waters of the oceans radioactive so much that they'll be sterile.

 I also thought this will be a problem for crashing one of these moons into Mars because if it has radioactive water it's not worth using for terraforming Mars.

 More recently as I looked at the pictures of Callisto, I realized it being outside the radiation belt more might not have the problem of its ocean being made of radioactive water. This is both because it's more outside the radiation belt of Jupiter, but also because unlike the other large moons we see Callisto has a large amount of cratering of the ice. This is to the point where some have described Callisto as a giant shattered crystal ball. It's believed that because the craters are remaining and the surface of the other moons are smoothed over perhaps by the heating of the radiation from Jupiter, Callisto's surface must perhaps be really old or older at any rate. So if the craters haven't been smoothed over this might bode well for this plan of using a magnetic bubble to move Callisto to Mars because it means there's not a lot of radioactivity from Jupiter melting them and so the ocean beneath might be more pure not a hazard to changing Mars more rapidly, but an advantage.

Here I also want to talk about the objection that might be raised that this method of rapidly changing Mars might be used by bad actors to try to crash an asteroid into the Earth like for a ransom.
 
 This however would take years even though it will be hugely faster than colonizing Mars with this method compared to the plan some have of boosting giant rocket boosters to Mars with supplies and materials.

 While much faster and cheaper than 10,000 years to colonize Mars, it would still take years, and be so slow that we'd have so much extra warning if an asteroid was being sent to the earth that we would need no more than a good enough sensor array and a simple deflection system which they've already tried out, so the danger of this might be actually much less than the value of colonizing Mars so rapidly and cheaply at least it certainly seems more of worth compared to other plans I'd heard of.

Goddard and Tsilokovsky were considered to be the originators of the idea of the elevator to orbit and while the elevator might be valuable, simply sending a magnetic bubble to near Jupiter might not just give us space to move around in with hardly any expense of shielding or heating and so on and ongoing constant risk of collapse or explosion for the space stations, but rather double our area of land to live on which maybe highly highly valuable. This idea which I am the father of would be much cheaper and yet higher value than the elevator. If anyone considers the elevator  this might even be worth more for our future.

Another World a Second Soap Opera!

 One possible use about this idea of cleansing Mars completely, could be that we could start completely anew with respect to chemical pollution. Like Alaska, the only state that's being planned before it's developed, we might learn to limit chemical pollution on Mars.

 This is because it's becoming apparent that chemicals like PFAs which are forever chemicals are in the ecosystem. This is the time of great disease after the time of great health before like in the 1950s. A lot of people would attribute this to pollution, and we may be looking forward to a world where fewer and fewer can have children and those children can have grandchildren, so that perhaps only 5% will be healthy and with the rise of so many diseases, that 5% will not be able to support the other 95% that are ill. One other good method of defending ourselves against the coming sea of poisonous chemicals that we're already living in, may be just the Earth because  medicinal cleansing clay can absorb out a large number (200 or more) toxins that are in our bodies!


 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 Cheaper Ways to make both Venus and Mars more Habitable

Carl Sagan says in Cosmos that all that water we see evidence for in the ancient stream channels of Mars probably maybe went into the ice caps of Mars and is still there.

 If we look at the evidence about the ancient stream beds they're right beside the craters, which means that liquid water didn't stay long on Mars or it would have eroded those craters rapidly and there will be no craters if liquid water was there over millions or hundreds of thousands of years. Many of the features show rapid erosion but that's about it.

 For this reason I think the real reason that there was liquid water on Mars for only a while was because of lack of gravity, and so if by a plan like Elon Musk's plan of crashing asteroids into the ice cap of Mars to hope to create more atmosphere and water for Mars atmosphere will only be temporary and fizzle away so the plan won't work to hold water and air on Mars anymore than the ancient labor of those volcanoes. As I discuss in my other post about hoping to crash one of the large satellites of Jupiter into Mars via a magnetic bubble (this would use the power of Jupiter's magnetic field to send the high-speed motion of Callisto off towards Mars) to give Mars an atmosphere and water much cheaper and faster than usual terraforming plans, I think we could conceivably use fusion powered excavation machines to dig down radial tunnels inside of Mars and there use the same fusion machines which are almost in reach now to compress the metals and mass of those tunnels in the center of Mars and give it gravity enough to overcome this problem completely.

 Even so Mars is far away and I think even better than just adding gravity or an atmosphere that's non toxic to Mars might be to find a cheap simple way to move Mars much nearer to the earth.

 To do this I propose that we use a satellite around a planet like Mars to move it inward or perhaps Venus to move it outward to Earth radius orbit.
 
 I think this might be achievable by satellites that have both magnets and solar collectors on them.

This method of moving a planet like Mars may be simple.. magnets on Mars, it's natural iron are used so it attracts the satellite with each orbit. The satellite goes around one loop and collects the solar energy with the magnet turned off, alternating on the next orbit with a magnet turned on.

 While this would only have a small amount of nudging with each orbit, orbit after orbit it would build up, moving Mars near to the Earth orbit enough that we have a much cheaper way to travel to and from Mars.

 Others have proposed methods of moving planets like using asteroids to nudge past and move a planet like NASA has considered in the future one day moving the Earth if the sun was engulfing it in billions of years from now about a foot for 11,000 years with the asteroids gravity per orbit. This would be much much slower then the satellite method because while each boost of the orbiting satellite is small, these are like every 30 minutes and each one will multiply and multiply the force on the planet to move it much faster.

 By using those methods of crashing a large more water-based moon into a planet like Venus we could also remove all its bad atmosphere and replace it with more healthy atmosphere for us at any rate!

 And by moving Venus  and Mars to Earth radius orbit, especially if we give gravity to Mars they won't be so hot or cold, with good non radioactive atmosphere that we can breathe with enough water, and so on. As I say elsewhere we can even give them the right amount of daytime 24 hours by setting the impacters to counter this problem which can cause really bad jet lag as the operators of the rover on Mars found. By the end of the mission they were exhausted.

 

 

Social Anxiety after Covid, and Post Ice Age...

What are the causes of social anxiety?

According to Discover magazine there are two competing ideas about this, one about social hierarchy and the other about social exclusion.

According to a clinical psychologist at Georgia State University Erinn Tone, if there were hierarchy in competition in our ancient times in evolution, in this view those with social anxiety would have been able to perceive in advance what might be best to do or not to do so it would have given them the advantage of a sort of wisdom.

 In the second explanation of social anxiety, the cause is not so much the hierarchy as the risk of being socially ostracized and this was associated more surely with death in older times, whether or not there was a  social hierarchy or competition.

 Today it's not usually likely that being ostracized from your group would mean you would die.

 "But we still react if as if the stakes are that high", says Tone.

 "Physioologically, I don't think we respond much differently to ostracism if it means we'll be left out on the frozen plain alone or will be left out of the group going out to Starbucks in a few minutes".

 Arthur Allison Whitten goes on to say, "Sadly we can't go back in time and verify our evolutionary theories of psychology and behavior with our ancestors. A cautionary example comes from a recent study that called into question how it was believed that women in prehistoric societies were only gatherers never hunters."

 It's an interesting question to ask why in the world this is so that we so completely believe that the physical is so much like the behavioral equivalent it seems to represent.

 What happens when a person loses their social status?

 One thing we could say is they often lose their ability to earn money.

 It's not it's not true as some may say, there's no cost associated with losing money, and all we need is love.

 The poor live on the average 14 years less than other people, and illnesses of aging start 10-years sooner for them.

 This reminds of me of like when the husband and wife win the lottery And the wife says, "What do we do about the begging letters?" and the husband says, "Keep sending them!"

 Or like when The wife says to the husband "I'm sure glad that bank is leaving us alone from now on, the message I got says, Final Notice!"

 Or the two women are talking at work, going over all the memories of  the years they have of being there on the job and one says why do we do this anyway?

And the other one says I think it has something to do with rent!

 And by the way what does a dog think about these sounds that we make when we talk, do they really have any meaning?

 We can say that in truth 5/6 of all there is can't be seen, and so much of what goes on about the competition we must be in if we're to flourish and survive has to do with all kinds of the fraud that goes on for example between the "Haves" and "Have Nots".

 This often takes place between where someone like the landlord just makes up a lie and pretends to be the one who's been ineptly criticized.

 Slings and arrows may break their bones, but spare them us candid confessor..

 "We'll always be criticized, and we will always be surprised when we've done our best and we're still being criticized."

 So in addition to the physical safety that having more profit and legitimate sanction Involves there's this sort of Wild Card of behavior that's unobvious but still there that adds a lot more often to the risk of decrease of resources in the event of ostracism.

It's been found that behavioral stress like the boss yelling at you does just as much harm to your health as actual physical events.

In truth we are all a fortress, and the way that we're criticized even if it's artificial sometimes and even if we get strength from it by the exercise, what we win is a prize just as we would have in evolution, and we might think of the triumph of being rich as the triumph of being behaviorally rich are related to each other in a real way.

 Who wants to be half rich, not someone who's been deceived.

 Maybe it's just that people think they can't afford doing a project on collapse!

Earning a living in some ways might seem to have no social value like trading crypto and yet some reason is why Bitcoin is the most searched word on web more than "find a local restaurant"..

People have evolved to cooperate where supercooperators won out in evolution, in a way the extra layer on top of cooperation Is against the way it was in evolution for most life....

 So people basically both cooperate because it has perceived social value yet in other ways people are uncooperative if they think they can get away with it..

 The lack of cooperation with its risk of collapse is the actual real picture in a way and it's certainly not absent.

We can imagine a world where more people were rich, and most of the opportunities for non cooperation were removed.

 Of course this might remove incentive to improve by way of the reduced risk of failure..

So it's not all bad about social anxiety.

 Other than just that it's better about being rich..

 Life is a Dance you learn as you go.. We understand it's the same as being in the wild In many respects while also with the extra prize we wouldn't have gotten the possibility of In evolution, of being rich.

So it's the extra prize That makes us feel it's at least possible we could win big and keeps us in the competition in hopes of winning the big prize. Or certainly we could say this has influence on a lot of the world.

 In reality the wildness of the behavior especially about money that we often see is the real truth, and Supercooperation is actually not as real or viable and so we have two opposites  one of which is false.

Of the two I would tend to favor millions of billions of years of evolution.

 So I think we can't just ignore what the boss says.

Even so I think it will be better if we can find ways to make the reality fit the dream more often instead of the dream fitting the reality.

One way to achieve this will be when the truth sensors like MRI get strong enough and perhaps portable so they can more reliably say what's really going on.

 

One way to improve it obviously will be to earn more money, and another way "if you're working on your second million but you unsaved your 100,000!" might be by way of my idea about the future of AR Augmented Reality. By this we put on our headset that makes it so we can't hear the boss yelling so loud, what did Edison know or hear, what did he Say?

As I say on this link click here or see more below....

SOLVE CONVERSATIONAL DISTRACTIONS;

https://your-ancientchipshiner.blogspot.com/2020/06/menu-word-of-more-breath-ahh_30.html?m=1

....Conversational destractions are costing the economy 57% of its money, so the secret way of how noise and other distractions are causing the risk of loss, may be valuable to counteract.

On my post I'll show you how make the best AN I've seen (better than r36 for speech) by cheap simple methods, and also how I think the main future about this may not be in visual but an audio AR.

Once you find a good way to stop the distractions including conversation and then replace it with the software which takes the words and changes them into the more positive words you might want like the boss yelling, but not chronically this may be helpful e.g. for weight control..

 This may be really valuable to our economy and to yours also I would say by this, the real future of AR I think. (Of course visual AR has value but visual distractions aren't costing the economy the most money.)

 Audio AR and AN like this may essentially have value for brain health for people, and this is the real reason that I believe that the future of AR maybe mostly in actually audio AR.

 Somebody says something to you and you're not reminded of how they've tried to be unsavory, but instead the machine takes this punch and helps you roll with it by both removing the bad word and also giving you suggestions to you about how you might reply that may be witty brilliant, or comedy so much of it is!

 You may have heard of   magazine articled they used to have, Snappy Answers to Stupid Questions. Well actually now they have computers that swap jokes and another software that swaps insults.

 I think mostly the best way to improve about conversational distractions may not be taking risks like this but just by simply giving brains a rest from all the random sound around them.

 Only the rich can afford peace and quiet now it's been said and also the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer and I think this is indeed because of conversational destractions.

 Finally want to say one more thing about the above article in Discover magazine.

 Allison Whitten the author, notes it's such a shame we can't go back in time and find what was going on in prehistoric events in hopes of resolution of some of these hopeful causes of Social Anxiety-right!

There's an old Asian folk saying If there's a problem, somewhere there must be a solution.

Mathematicians have classified problems and supposedly any computer given enough time can solve  any problem.

 Even the same mathematicians have made lists of other related unsolvable types of problems.

 Here we may get lots and lots more time for this one at any rate!

 Why?

It might seem at first glance that this is one of the unsolvable problems on the shelf about finding out about these prehistoric events.

 However I can think of a way based on brain physiology.

 It was found in the lab in the 1920s that every neuron in your brain contains the entire memory of the whole brain. This based on the evidence of science and I think we might be able to use it to essentially just find old neurons and use sensors like MRI to find the evidence in those old neurons about stuff like this including lots of historical events supposedly gone from history that we couldn't before..   For example we could try to find what ancient music sounded like..

 The vast majority of the history of music has been lost supposedly, and we could find perhaps evidence about every major event in history and huge amounts of other data from "prehistoric" neurons (which would no longer be so.)

In my research I was inspired by one more idea, that we might use lasers from low energy that converge to a point and then back out to the sensor on the other side to sense these events and this might make a really good substitute for MRI brain scans because it could be much cheaper, portable and also of much higher resolution because it uses lasers instead of magnetic fields.

 How does the laser light more safely sense the neurons? A proposal on the shelf is that the lasers converge enough to sense the neurons but not so much they harm them.

It's believed that we could also use this as a sensor for food to find and remove toxins almost in real time..

 This may be of special import for the future of food processing technology, because it's been noted antibiotics may fail to remove pathogens in a general collapse of the food processing business otherwise..

 SOLVE CONVERSATIONAL DISTRACTIONS;

https://your-ancientchipshiner.blogspot.com/2020/06/menu-word-of-more-breath-ahh_30.html?m=1

  Blood Pressure And Health, The Computerized Rocking Chair

As noted in Discover magazine, we evolved to run fast and catch our prey after we had invented tools for hunting. This means we have to keep on running on the treadmill even while we do sit-ups elsewhere in BC events, like watching television!

 It's also been known how monkeys and apes in the zoo don't get illnesses like high blood pressure or blood sugar as they age.

 Their social life in the wild is not with a lot of walking or exercising.

 It's been known that we share 87% of our genes with the apes.

 So I believe somewhere in the other 3% of the genes that we share there may be the cure for both high blood pressure and high blood sugar..

 On another note it's been found that one muscle in your calf dramatically boosts metabolism. It burns glucose and and not glycogen like other muscles so you when you sit to do a push up by tipping your heels up while your toes are on the floor, you boost your metabolism for hours not minutes like other exercise.

 Since this muscle doesn't burn glycogen like other muscles it causes you to not become tired of the exercise for hours.

 This exercise called the soleus push-up,  burns 67% more insulin and fat etc.

 Exercising most other muscle burns glycogen so you get tired of it, and sitting is considered to be especially harmful to your health.

 This idea seems to lend itself to a computerized rocking chair. The soleus pushup as it is now takes special training or hardware, and a rocking chair might be of worth. 

A Possible Way to Completely Remove Covid 19!

One thing about the Corona virus that we may not hear as much about is how it relates to the 1918 flu.

 WHY THE 1918 FLU FIZZLED OUT

 Because viruses like pneumonia that are involved with the lungs compete with others.

 
 The 1918 flu fizzled out because of it being replaced by another more harmless "inert" virus.

I think this might lend to a valuable new strategy for Covid.

 In this scenario we use a second virus to resolve it or find a natural virus that competes and boost it with engineering.

 This might give us a durable viable way to remove Covid without constantly having to watch out for new mutant strains.

If we almost or completely eliminate Covid then we also eliminate its opportunities to mutate.

 The sooner we might do this the better because Covid has combined more with time and might even limit this strategy itself if it was not implemented in time.

Otherwise we may be stuck with Covid  indefinitely into the future, taking lives and damaging the economy..

 

While the 1918 flu fizzled out partially because of World War I.. the countries were trying to hide their vulnerability and not much playing up about the loss of life also because of the flu.

 This might be one of the main reasons that the 1918 flu was "forgotten" and this might not be as well known as it relates to Covid...

 This might also be our best defense against new bio weapons being developed as in this quote from the UK Daily Post..

 

"The virus was discovered while scientists were working on a lethal form of mousepox.

This killed 100 per cent of mice even if they had been given anti-viral drugs as well as a vaccine that would normally protect them."