Einstein hated the idea that you needed to collapse the wave function to find out what the low energy field was about and I agree.
Einstein was looking for a way to essentially get around this necessity of measuring what's measured with what's measured and nothing else, and he thought of a low energy particle that we might use to find the information about the low energy field yet without collapsing the wave function.
I agree with Einstein here because of my idea about the definition of information. The signal between two electrons as they move from disappearing to reappearing on the other side apparently at faster than light is based on a signal; change in one place with exchange of energy with probabilistic changes in the other electron by way of the Feynman diagrams as it resurfaces.
By the physics so far, it's well known that we can't find Einstein's low energy particle although so-called low energy quantum experiments have proven Einstein was at least partially right, sending a quantum mouse past Schrodinger's quantum cat and watching how the mouse behaves to see if the cat is dead or alive inside the box..
This would be by way of the Feynman diagrams because the low energy waves aren't 100% wavelike and they have particulate events in order to be even unified to any degree as measured by the diagrams. In a way this is partial proof of Einstein's low energy quanta he hoped to find. The waves are neither infinfinitely wavelike or superluminal but they are above the degree of relativity perhaps to many levels just as the Earth is more at rest and privileged than the moon with degrees of value. There is no absolute rest frame but in science as life some are moreso than others.
I agree with Einstein that quantum uncertainty is unnecessarily binding, both because he believed in a non-relativistic framework for this and also because relativity I believe relativity is not complete. If the observer is not absolute in quantum mechanics, then it may not be absolute elsewhere as in relativity for the uniformity of nature.
By relativity however, we couldn't have the underlying stability of the quanta so that you collapse the entire couch when you collapse one quantum of the couch with the light. Instead of relativity being the foundation here, I believe inside the quanta the waves are also spinning faster than light for the central charge of the electron to be so much off the chart when you measure it with inelastic scattering experiments, and contrary to relativity the world around us is stable because of a phase change with this faster than light spin and that makes it there the quanta have underlying stability like gyroscopes because if the quanta collapse there is no phase change allowed by relativity and there would be nothing to keep them from collapsing indefinitely. The change of phase would be a good solution I think. And as Einstein said, by wave mechanics the underlying stability of the world would be non-relativistic and so relativity itself as I say may not be complete.
Photo by Gerd Altmann
I think we may be able to find most of the information that Einstein hoped to search for with research and that is by what is called the Zeno method of finding low energy events recently devised. This is where you take the "tube of light" like a laser tube and you twist it like a balloon and you measure much smaller events at much lower subquantum energy levels. This may be the best way we can come up with to improve on quantum uncertainty which Einstein was saying about why can't you can't measure the quantum without another quanta of another level energy. And Einstein quipped "Do you seriously think the Moon is not up there if we don't look at it?"
So I propose that we use the Zeno method by taking an electron on one side and then doing repeated experiments where we slide that tube of light at much much lower energy back and forth between the two seeming like superluminal electrons and hopes of sussing out all the events of the Feynman diagrams and Einstein's other hope of the non-relativistic general value of solving quantum mechanics and "don't forget relativity"..
I think we may be able to find most of the information that Einstein hoped to search for with research and that is by what is called the Zeno method of finding low energy events recently devised. This is where you take the "tube of light" like a laser tube and you twist it like a balloon and you measure much smaller events at much lower subquantum energy levels. This may be the best way we can come up with to improve on quantum uncertainty which Einstein was saying about why can't you can't measure the quantum without another quanta of another level energy. And Einstein quipped "Do you seriously think the Moon is not up there if we don't look at it?"
So I propose that we use the Zeno method by taking an electron on one side and then doing repeated experiments where we slide that tube of light at much much lower energy back and forth between the two seeming like superluminal electrons and hopes of sussing out all the events of the Feynman diagrams and Einstein's other hope of the non-relativistic general value of solving quantum mechanics and "don't forget relativity"..
