Storm Based Proton Fusion, and Electron Polar Fusion
What powers thunderstorms? I believe that lining up the fields may be the cause of what by others are named Low Energy Nuclear Reactions. Thunderstorms and lightning,have been found recently to have more energy than even a solar flare.One explanation has been devised, that the proton and electrons of atoms are ionized leaving neutrons. These then move into the radioactive atoms always present naturally in the air in the thunderstorm, and in this explanation related to Cold Fusion their radioactivity is primed by the neutrons releasing lots of energy. The power of lightning is indeed about 2 ktons per bolt, and we might expect some sort of radioactivity to be the cause.
Unlike in other methods of explaining storms, lightning is linear and it would reverse the bolts above to below 20 times per second as seen with some lighting. By lining up the NS of each proton merely by reversing the NS orientation of the ions, my idea Storm Based Proton Fusion (SBPF) would allow the power itself to be generated inside the bolts. First the leader stroke would be aligned by the NS alignment more than before, then with protons or atoms of valence inside where the bolt would be aligned, the electrons would run down this zone, competing the circuit. Due to couloumb forces and the general randomness of the field lines, the number of protons that would fuse would be small, as the nuclear reactions though strong, are still "low energy". Once two protons or ions would fuse, being mostly at right angles, the neutrons and positrons moving outward would explain why storms are indeed with associated neutron radiation. As the protons would implode via the magnetic fields with less resistance than the quantized electric fields at right angles, they would radiate the neutrons at right angles to the bolt, while the implosion powered by the strong force would also draw near the protons beside them and this could strengthen the flow of the electron current on the outside of the bolt. And the N and S magnetic fields here may also like a one way valve for each fusion implosion, strengthening the magnetic fields of the protons in the line of the bolt and thus the electron current outside. The channel is the same for the numerous cycles of the lightning so the same charges would be used for each discharge, this is how I got the idea the poles of the same protons might have a simple reversal of the magnetic heavy protons (the protons if heavier also stay more stable with each bolt so the channel is with "reruns of the weather station!"
The Curie limit common to higher temperature physics might be overcome if the inner magnetic field of the protons are also much stronger. High energy particles like electrons align their spins with a strong field.
The protons are near enough to fuse some times, say 1 in 100, the power source of the lightning, while instability and couloumb forces would limit a complete chain reaction like Low Energy Radioactivity with the protons at more distance than most would fuse.
There is no other known explanation for how lightning works, Low Energy and the Lorentz method of relativistic resonance are used only with radiation deep inside the storm. One problem with relativistic electrons is how they could move through the solid wall of rain often seen in storms. Protons or ions are more solid and "inside the water." I think it's possible a combination of the Lorentz method for the general electric cloud and then the fusion for the bolts to discharge the charge might be the cause. On the other hand SBPF could power and amplify the cloud not vice versa. It's already known that the Lorentz method is not enough energy to be the cause of lightning. Actually most lightning is inside the cloud while neither of these methods would be the cause of linear lighting outside it, electrons and heavy particles would naturally radiate outward and the linear bolts outside the cloud or the cause of the line of the flow would be otherwise unknown. The bolts are linear and narrow. For the return bolt the charges would reverse to SN and the electrons would then flow in the opposite direction, with more and more of the charge in the cloud used up in each loop. Low Energy Nuclear to me seems radiant like a sphere since it seems to be"glorified radioactivity"; there seems to be unlimited radioactive air available, and would lead to unlimited explosion of the storm, even outside the bolt. By only being able to reach ignition inside the zone of heat like the tokamak the fusion would be limited and not reach the zone outside the bolt. This is the same reason why the tokamak and other machines fail to sustain the reaction and why the Low Energy reaction method seems less of worth than SBPF. A simple way to prove this explanation of overcoming the Coulomb forces as the scientists who found Cold Fusion believed, may be by a simple force exerted on aligned protons, either by collision or anvils like in the Low Energy Reaction method where the atoms are so close they may fuse, if there is more energy released than by common physics this may prove my idea..
One thing about this if true is that fusion like this would be messier than another type of fusion I have named Electron Fusion EF. Electrons might be of use, much easier to find than protons or uranium, by moving them to fuse NS NS. There would be no fusion byproducts like with the strong force. I assume since electrons don't explode, there's more holding them together than the force outward, thus it seems we might be able to unify them to fuse for the nonquantized adhesion of the magnetic fields which would help not resist the reaction..
The Curie limit common to higher temperature physics might be overcome if the inner magnetic field of the protons are also much stronger. High energy particles like electrons align their spins with a strong field.
The protons are near enough to fuse some times, say 1 in 100, the power source of the lightning, while instability and couloumb forces would limit a complete chain reaction like Low Energy Radioactivity with the protons at more distance than most would fuse.
There is no other known explanation for how lightning works, Low Energy and the Lorentz method of relativistic resonance are used only with radiation deep inside the storm. One problem with relativistic electrons is how they could move through the solid wall of rain often seen in storms. Protons or ions are more solid and "inside the water." I think it's possible a combination of the Lorentz method for the general electric cloud and then the fusion for the bolts to discharge the charge might be the cause. On the other hand SBPF could power and amplify the cloud not vice versa. It's already known that the Lorentz method is not enough energy to be the cause of lightning. Actually most lightning is inside the cloud while neither of these methods would be the cause of linear lighting outside it, electrons and heavy particles would naturally radiate outward and the linear bolts outside the cloud or the cause of the line of the flow would be otherwise unknown. The bolts are linear and narrow. For the return bolt the charges would reverse to SN and the electrons would then flow in the opposite direction, with more and more of the charge in the cloud used up in each loop. Low Energy Nuclear to me seems radiant like a sphere since it seems to be"glorified radioactivity"; there seems to be unlimited radioactive air available, and would lead to unlimited explosion of the storm, even outside the bolt. By only being able to reach ignition inside the zone of heat like the tokamak the fusion would be limited and not reach the zone outside the bolt. This is the same reason why the tokamak and other machines fail to sustain the reaction and why the Low Energy reaction method seems less of worth than SBPF. A simple way to prove this explanation of overcoming the Coulomb forces as the scientists who found Cold Fusion believed, may be by a simple force exerted on aligned protons, either by collision or anvils like in the Low Energy Reaction method where the atoms are so close they may fuse, if there is more energy released than by common physics this may prove my idea..
One thing about this if true is that fusion like this would be messier than another type of fusion I have named Electron Fusion EF. Electrons might be of use, much easier to find than protons or uranium, by moving them to fuse NS NS. There would be no fusion byproducts like with the strong force. I assume since electrons don't explode, there's more holding them together than the force outward, thus it seems we might be able to unify them to fuse for the nonquantized adhesion of the magnetic fields which would help not resist the reaction..
Lightning tubes have been devised that have all the effects of lightning yet at 1/100 the power. This idea of how lightning works will be easy to find at higher energy where all the voltage in the lab machine isn't input. Fusion via lasers is common in machines like ITER, the problem is about it fizzling out. The way lightning may be different may in SBPF be about the NS alignment where the outer electron zone moves the protons together by the ions and there are more of the zones powering the lightning.
