INFLATION COSMOLOGY And The WILKINSEN WMAP OBSERVATIONS


   It's believed the Wilkensen Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) which show the cleanest
map yet of the cosmic microwave background or CMB, may imply Guth's cosmic inflation was the start of a chain reaction of other bubble universes. See this page for more about Guth's idea. WMAP shows a round simple cosmic circle with regular "sides" of the cosmos, Click here for image. Tufts University astronomer Alex Vilenken believes in this, and NYU researchers Spencer Chang, Thomas Levi, and Matthew Kleban say "If the two bubble universes impacted, the impact zone would be in the shape of a circle, and the pulse of energy from this circular zone would travel into our bubble like a shock wave, where it would presumably leave a disk like imprint on the microwave background". Kleban predicted that the light may be polarized in special angles in two concentric rings of the disk.

  My belief is another view of both cosmology and cosmogony, I've named Cosmic Jet Cosmology, or CJC. I use more familiar physics seen in astronomy of the jets that are of stars and more massive bodies the highest energy seen of any masses of the universe. In this cosmology, it may be of related high energy events. The observed Hubble radiant outward travel of the galaxies might be mostly inside one of the jets, where we are, the other perhaps yet too distant to see. In CJC the jets then move out to the cosmic equator which would also explain this feature found by WMAP, though not by Kleban's explanation. Bubbles would be radiant and spherical, spin would involve a zone like this band of galaxies, not bubbles. In CJC the jets from the source of radiance like the galaxies while scaled up more in higher power, could then spill over to the plane of the cosmos, the cosmic equator then might implode the matter back from the plane to the center of the jets where it's recycled by the gravity to reradiate via the jets in infinite cycles of radiance and implosion conserving energy and powered by gravity.

  The Sloan sky survey seems to show that more galaxies are spinning counterclockwise in the N hemisphere than they would by inflation cosmology. The S hemisphere survey is in progress to see if it is also with clockwise spins of the galaxies. As on this page it seems anamalous the Milky Way is spinning with spin axis highly aligned with the direction of the cosmic expansion seen. This seems to be definite evidence against a completely smooth era of inflation expansion as in Guth's cosmology.


OTHER OBJECTIONS TO GUTH'S INFLATION COSMOLOGY

  Inflation Expansion cosmology was the most published idea in cosmology by researchers in the early 1980's. However, CJ Cosmology may be better to explain the cosmos, since in CJ Cosmology energy is conserved via recycling of the energy jets to plane and rewinding up via gravity, and a simple spherical Big Bang created out of nothing would violate energy conservation.  Another problem with Inflation Expansion that CJC allows more solution for is about the short period of hyperinflation that Guth used to explain the general smoothness of the microwave radiation (except for the lower energy fossil found by WMAP. And perhaps the possible spin of the cosmos.) What caused the hyperinflation and why it stopped are neither explained in Inflation Cosmology. There are no known physics involved, and this is completely to be accepted on faith in Inflation Cosmology. Where ultimate cosmology is from we may say. These two problems of inflation expansion have not been much considered.
 
 In CJ Cosmology the cause of the general smoothness is only that the slow speed of light via electromagnetism can't connect up the galaxies at great distances and only the weaker force of gravity being faster than light could connect even inside the jet. Indeed I use the regularity of the sides and central zone as evidence that gravity being lighter than light may be faster than light. Only the weaker force of gravity being faster than light could connect inside the jets. My hopeful generalization of Maxwell's idea that was forgotten with the goings on of Relativity is the method he used to predict the speed of light exactly based on the resilience (density) of the field. If gravity is lighter than light it may move faster than light, you lighten up to travel faster. The question here I would still ask is "how did Maxwell do this" hardly a coincidence it seems.. Though my explanation I call General Wave Dynamics, may not be as dramatic as relativity, it's possible GWD may give us new science like in astronomy, high speed communications, or finding advanced civilizations faster, or computers, and how gravity works, by finding the deeper truth. Here's my GWD synopsis or see the link upper left of the page. In CJ Cosmology and GWD gravity is lower energy and longer acting, and thus the microwaves are smoother than by relativity. If gravity is at the speed of light, thermodynamic entropy like via the speed of light wouldn't hold the cosmos together..


 If the fields are in a continuous loop of eternal motion powered by gravity like the world would spin if left in the cosmos as a system, there might be a more electromagnetic cause of expansion and radiance too as I say on my site about Cosmic Jet Cosmology . As in the huge magnetic fields found between the galaxies, and perhaps the Cosmic jets being of ionized charge would attract the plane of the cosmos, causing cosmic acceleration, also unexplained in Kleban's view or Inflation Expansion, and so on. CJ Cosmology saves energy conservation and the same mechanism causing the jets of galaxies might be used to solve the Hubble radiance that vexed Einstein and caused him to invent the Einstein cosmological constant. To me Einstein seems to have believed in a deeper truth in cosmology.


 The WMAP would be explained as looking at the center of the cosmic jet on our side as in the same general result as bubble cosmology. CJC predicts a related mirrorlike image seen on the other side, looking inward to the center of the cosmos. Here we might see another low energy image with the same central zone except to a different degree since it's in expansion too, though not at the higher rate of speed of the outer cosmic radiance.

 I have three scenarios for bubble impacts if Guth is correct;

 Either a bubbble might impact and continue in, leaving a lot of matter to find yet this hasn't been seen just the much lower energy WMAP.


Or it could could bounce off and leave even more energy, also "off the WMAP".


Thus it might be stationary relative to our universe with a standing wave.


  The problem with all there is here is about the simplicity of the central circle and sides, especially in the third situation, which may seem most probable. An impact would seem to have more complex waves and ripples that wash around the outside of the bubbles, not just two, especially if it's a standing wave. In CJ Cosmology I imagine it's possible the cosmic belt zone seen by WMAP implies cosmic spin, and this would imply torque forces and more complexity of the ripples seen, yet the data so far shows simplicity. You might say, comic cosmology rules. Hyperinflation allows a simple wave seen since the bubble expansion smooths out the geometry. CJ Cosmology makes the same general prediction since the shear forces of the jet would explain the simplicity of the waves seen too. The "sides" as in the image are not a disk and can't be explained by the impact of the bubbles.. I think they may be caused by the red shift of the field flowing more in our line of site, as the jet flows more sideways above us since we aren't in the center, the displacement of the light would reduce the temperature we see. While the jet is regular, it's not symmetrical all around as the bubble would have. CJ Cosmology makes other predictions the bubbles won't and may also solve the problem of when the cosmos was created. If eternal, it seems more creative..

  By F=ma, not the less general Emc2, the motion of smaller bodies around galaxies might be used to map the force between galaxies. Emc2 says there is more mass of a heavy body, and more energy. So when the same force is applied to a heavy and a light mass they should both move at the same speed, heavy and light are equal in Relativity. Mass doesn't enter into the equation of fall in the Earth's field, so Einstein believed it was space itself that controls gravity, either the mass or the earth is in equivalent motion, it doesn't matter which.

  If there is a magnetic force powering the cosmic expansion or even acceleration, it will act on charged galaxies and lighter masses in different ways in GWD for the lower energy fields. A lighter galaxy will move a bit faster with the radiance outward, one with more charge yet faster, and a heavy light galaxy with no charge will have the most inertia and so move in the most linear way all else held the same. These three components may help map out the force powering the cosmic radiance.

 Impacting bubbles in time imply complexity as in ripples. No ripples are yet seen though they should have been by impacting bubbles. Also the asymmetrical spin of galaxies is relatively complex, and moderate complexity is involved in CJ Cosmology too because of spin not completely via the stretching of the world lines of the linear motion reducing angular motion though not completely nearby us in the jet on our side. Einstein's idea has more complexity via stability over time, (and a simple radiance and expansion being in balance so no round zone as in the image so Einstein's cosmology in a simple form seems disproven) and so do impacting bubbles via the ripples. Impacting bubbles imply more complexity if the resonant fossil wave has had plenty of time to resonate and vibrate. A constant of expansion plus some angular momentem nearer us has moderate complexity as observed, as in the sheets of galaxies, the Great Wall, and so on. In general in CJ Cosmology there are the jets, the one jet near us that would the cause of the symmetrical round zone seen, and the more distant asymmetry of the cosmic equator, to balance the expansion and then conserve energy by the inward motion of the disc. Any spin of galaxies implies disproof of Inflation Cosmology, and a slower radiance would be found with finite jets. The spins of the galaxies imply the radiance like in a jet is assymetrical, and by no means perfectly smooth as in inflation cosmology.



The spin of the cosmos nearby might be much smaller than a method like Einstein used to explain how we haven't imploded to the center. If the universe is balanced both in and out, where's all the spin? In general there is spin at the cosmic disc in CJ Cosmology, and this is distant. A jet near us would be via linear travel as we radiate out to reach the cosmic plane and it would have just some spin, though not a lot. Inflation cosmology predicts no spin, Einstein's idea predicts lots of spin, and CJ Cosmology predicts just some spin as observed, and because we may be at the center of the jet, CJC predicts the spin axis is parallel to our travel outward.


OTHER PREDICTIONS, THOUGH NOT MORE OF ALL THERE IS! Of COSMIC JET COSMOLOGY