3d PRINTERS AND THE ECONOMY
3d printers some say may print all there is perhaps including baked goods, houses (a pixel is a brick filled with foam), even recycling the ink and virus printers. You read of Tim Berners Lee inventor of the internet on Christmas day 1990, he had one web page and one machine, and what to link was his woe. He always said the internet should be in reach of all machines, and above all at no cost. More recently Lee promotes this cost for sites such as Facebook that he holds are walled off zones that can't be copied to the other reams. He believes these sites if too substantial would threaten the worth of the web for all. This seems like a fab Beatles house printout, like the web was first imagined by Edison, No not automatic writing like Houdini, rather Winston Churchill's same portent of the internet in the 1940's. Lee ignores the publishing and information business, 50% of the economy. You may think of music as big about copyright, but this is only 5% of the information work like software, financial advisors who forecast weather as well as a doctor who forecasts the weather! There is some money in streaming it seems while the publishing industry is or may be in ruins due to the web, though methods like the ISP tax could help..actually authors are now hoping to unite with codes so they will still be paid by new methods unfounded a few years ago. What did Nabster Nab.
Copyright is the basic level of IP, trademark is the middle level and patent is the higher level of activity here.. If the web has dissolved copyright already, imagine a world with no inventors being paid, where no one is rich, there are no stores, the economy is of just a much fewer number of products, most of them ink or durable goods, like manufacturing burgers, where mining, service industries and food processing may be the least affected yet though we have all the goods we want cheap since anyone can print out a lamp or hot dish top, there may be even fewer good jobs than now with the internet because people won't go to the store to buy stuff when they can just print it out. Cars or trains couldn't be so easily printed out, though the price from a reliable source to ensure safety and quality could still be rather high. I go to the store and see the value of VISAs and a millionare just looks at the prices. I think like the rich I know so much! We imagine there is a positive side of this, you go in the store left and many of your buys are much cheaper.
Even so with 3d printers we may have all we want of some things and they are cheap, but with less jobs most people would have less money to buy food or pay charities doctors or the police. President Truman would say that most people are energised by the creative people, and without them it would be less enriching. He would say the other people owe their livelyhood to them."
Some say they wouldn't even be willing to pay a 5$ ISP tax in the respect to the 50% of the economy in information work already involved with this and this seems like energising stimulants work, they seem to give energy by stressing one part of the system to give energy to another. Even so there tends to be burnout for most in the general sense for most stimulants other than more natural ones.
Solutions
Lee mentions Facebook with woe and like a musical coffin they charge 20 to find out if comfortable (and as if for relaxation!). He says it's restricting information yet this sounds like the pre BC Before Computer publishing. Access was limited to information and only in reach for a fee via booksellers, at least for new books or RN Weather Maps. This didn't stop the world from sound 45 rpm sounds making musicians feel of worth.
If you are a web author why not consider making your site with paid access just as Lee has warts about. The more authoors aren't cheaping out, the more often all will be paid. I'm considering this at least partially, even if no one reads my sites at least I would be helping save the economy! Think of me too, thanks...
Second, the ISP tax may be better. More people could be rich so more wealth for all. One important thing saving IP or inventors rights would allow is a way out of poverty for people who were smart and poor, say Einstein Twain or Edison. He knows the worth of bread who hasn't had enough to eat. It's a higher nature for the poor to get richer, for millions of years they were, or evolution would have stopped. It's been seen that in the US there are all kinds of people crossing from poverty to wealth each month, and this seems as it should be.
Also more and more authors can sign up for sites like Amazon Create space that pay well at no cost to the author. (With Create space, more than just words are allowed, and the author doesn't have to author an entire book, allowing more authors than many ebook businesses). If enough authors sign up, supply goes down, and prices paid will again be like after the late 1700's, when the business of authors arrived. (Shakespeare and none of the ancients ever made a living as authors.)
And for the 3d printers a more elaborate way may be used to essentially not treat inventors like third world economies, or stores out of business and the bad economy. There are now patents on machines that jolt heavy particles like in the atom to hopefully create matter waves, known to exist by Einstein's relativity and "recently proven" by measuring pulsar's rate of decelleration as the radiance is radiant. We know how strong a shock will create the radiation and that they are in this range. What this may make is a really good sensor. As in to find out where all the printers are and what's been printed.
I envisioned a use of other radar sensors like ones in use the size of a light that sense the heartbeat and breathing on the other side of a wall even a three foot concrete wall to document who was there by the unique way we breathe and our special heart health, sort of like a voice print or UPS signup where your x is the only one like it in the box or outside the box. In Mexico the painters pay taxes by selling their pictures at auction and in Norway they sign the paint with their fingerprint so no forgeries, complex fingerprints like Ben Franklin's leaf copies on each bill unlike others have power to foil bogus cash, In Gutenberg he trusted .
The radar if used like on UAV's (drones) is good but it would be jammed by metal so while we would be able to find say who's in good health or has had a heart attack, great for ER visits, the best use would be limited since the bad people would just buy shielding like aluminum foil for the walls.
Since the gravity wave sensors just use heavy particles and they would fit on a UAV, this might make a good surveillance device in general. Since gravity doesn't shield it would be useful for census and solving murders and for freeing the 50,000 servants who "Reader's Digest believes" are being held in the US in households e.g to do forced labor for the owner. Experts say there's little hope they would be saved and using this type of drones might save them.
About the printers and copyright these and the stuff they print could be sensed by the drones. All printers if found to be in error would have chips to stop them by Wifi connection and so on. This reminds me of Orrin Hatch, senior congressman also a songwriter who actually sells about 100,000$ worth of song rights a year for his songs. Hatch hoped to pass laws so if anyone downloaded a song wrong from say ITunes, their PC would be stopped by distant explosion of the machine. Since gravity waves don't reflect the best way to sense say who is in a house might be to use a signal on the ground sent to the drone that is over the horizon yet in a line between the machines.
You might say gravity is real weak, so it wouldn't give high enough resolution. I believe gravity may whiz between heavier mass in the room between them mostly, thus not stopping much essentially because of the conservation laws. CLICK HERE Even so gravity can't implode infinitely because it would be infinite, and the heavier fields interact with the field even if field exclusion would be the cause of disproof of gravity, e.g. by the "antigravity" of electromagnetism lifting us up inside to stop the gravity from downward force. Thus there are two forces as usual, the gravity, and the electromagnetism of each mass, and a zone between them where they are in balanced. Gravity has power to push us down in the sofa, so I believe each zone of field has gravity as strong as the heavier field, the zone outside each atom and so on. This means even if the IP machines use gravity, it may have high enough resolution to find more than a blob.
If the printerbots won, our world would be more like a third world economy. This would reduce the money of countries like the chinese importers, and if we try to make our economy "artificially elevated" to hold on to our wealth there would be much temptation for unlawful outside business. This would be inside the economy and also from outside also. Only by a real good method of sensing what is where and a reliable way to stop the counterfeiters of shelves, walls and labor stations is this possible. I had believed this like the problem with Orin Hatch's solution would be limited by the unfeasibility of all the legal costs of enforcing the rules still saving IP and the economy. The main cost for the printers would be in finding where they are, what they've printed and sensing if they have the chip. If cheap reliable sensors and a way to enforce the IP laws were available here, the main costs would be reduced and more.. A false 911 alarm costs municipalities 350$.
Wednesday, December 05, 2012
INFLATION COSMOLOGY And The WILKINSEN WMAP OBSERVATIONS
It's believed the Wilkensen Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) which show the cleanest
map yet of the cosmic microwave background or CMB, may imply Guth's cosmic inflation was the start of a chain reaction of other bubble universes. See this page for more about Guth's idea. WMAP shows a round simple cosmic circle with regular "sides" of the cosmos, Click here for image. Tufts University astronomer Alex Vilenken believes in this, and NYU researchers Spencer Chang, Thomas Levi, and Matthew Kleban say "If the two bubble universes impacted, the impact zone would be in the shape of a circle, and the pulse of energy from this circular zone would travel into our bubble like a shock wave, where it would presumably leave a disk like imprint on the microwave background". Kleban predicted that the light may be polarized in special angles in two concentric rings of the disk.
My belief is another view of both cosmology and cosmogony, I've named Cosmic Jet Cosmology, or CJC. I use more familiar physics seen in astronomy of the jets that are of stars and more massive bodies the highest energy seen of any masses of the universe. In this cosmology, it may be of related high energy events. The observed Hubble radiant outward travel of the galaxies might be mostly inside one of the jets, where we are, the other perhaps yet too distant to see. In CJC the jets then move out to the cosmic equator which would also explain this feature found by WMAP, though not by Kleban's explanation. Bubbles would be radiant and spherical, spin would involve a zone like this band of galaxies, not bubbles. In CJC the jets from the source of radiance like the galaxies while scaled up more in higher power, could then spill over to the plane of the cosmos, the cosmic equator then might implode the matter back from the plane to the center of the jets where it's recycled by the gravity to reradiate via the jets in infinite cycles of radiance and implosion conserving energy and powered by gravity.
The Sloan sky survey seems to show that more galaxies are spinning counterclockwise in the N hemisphere than they would by inflation cosmology. The S hemisphere survey is in progress to see if it is also with clockwise spins of the galaxies. As on this page it seems anamalous the Milky Way is spinning with spin axis highly aligned with the direction of the cosmic expansion seen. This seems to be definite evidence against a completely smooth era of inflation expansion as in Guth's cosmology.
OTHER OBJECTIONS TO GUTH'S INFLATION COSMOLOGY
Inflation Expansion cosmology was the most published idea in cosmology by researchers in the early 1980's. However, CJ Cosmology may be better to explain the cosmos, since in CJ Cosmology energy is conserved via recycling of the energy jets to plane and rewinding up via gravity, and a simple spherical Big Bang created out of nothing would violate energy conservation. Another problem with Inflation Expansion that CJC allows more solution for is about the short period of hyperinflation that Guth used to explain the general smoothness of the microwave radiation (except for the lower energy fossil found by WMAP. And perhaps the possible spin of the cosmos.) What caused the hyperinflation and why it stopped are neither explained in Inflation Cosmology. There are no known physics involved, and this is completely to be accepted on faith in Inflation Cosmology. Where ultimate cosmology is from we may say. These two problems of inflation expansion have not been much considered.
In CJ Cosmology the cause of the general smoothness is only that the slow speed of light via electromagnetism can't connect up the galaxies at great distances and only the weaker force of gravity being faster than light could connect even inside the jet. Indeed I use the regularity of the sides and central zone as evidence that gravity being lighter than light may be faster than light. Only the weaker force of gravity being faster than light could connect inside the jets. My hopeful generalization of Maxwell's idea that was forgotten with the goings on of Relativity is the method he used to predict the speed of light exactly based on the resilience (density) of the field. If gravity is lighter than light it may move faster than light, you lighten up to travel faster. The question here I would still ask is "how did Maxwell do this" hardly a coincidence it seems.. Though my explanation I call General Wave Dynamics, may not be as dramatic as relativity, it's possible GWD may give us new science like in astronomy, high speed communications, or finding advanced civilizations faster, or computers, and how gravity works, by finding the deeper truth. Here's my GWD synopsis or see the link upper left of the page. In CJ Cosmology and GWD gravity is lower energy and longer acting, and thus the microwaves are smoother than by relativity. If gravity is at the speed of light, thermodynamic entropy like via the speed of light wouldn't hold the cosmos together..
If the fields are in a continuous loop of eternal motion powered by gravity like the world would spin if left in the cosmos as a system, there might be a more electromagnetic cause of expansion and radiance too as I say on my site about Cosmic Jet Cosmology . As in the huge magnetic fields found between the galaxies, and perhaps the Cosmic jets being of ionized charge would attract the plane of the cosmos, causing cosmic acceleration, also unexplained in Kleban's view or Inflation Expansion, and so on. CJ Cosmology saves energy conservation and the same mechanism causing the jets of galaxies might be used to solve the Hubble radiance that vexed Einstein and caused him to invent the Einstein cosmological constant. To me Einstein seems to have believed in a deeper truth in cosmology.
The WMAP would be explained as looking at the center of the cosmic jet on our side as in the same general result as bubble cosmology. CJC predicts a related mirrorlike image seen on the other side, looking inward to the center of the cosmos. Here we might see another low energy image with the same central zone except to a different degree since it's in expansion too, though not at the higher rate of speed of the outer cosmic radiance.
I have three scenarios for bubble impacts if Guth is correct;
Either a bubbble might impact and continue in, leaving a lot of matter to find yet this hasn't been seen just the much lower energy WMAP.
Or it could could bounce off and leave even more energy, also "off the WMAP".
Thus it might be stationary relative to our universe with a standing wave.
The problem with all there is here is about the simplicity of the central circle and sides, especially in the third situation, which may seem most probable. An impact would seem to have more complex waves and ripples that wash around the outside of the bubbles, not just two, especially if it's a standing wave. In CJ Cosmology I imagine it's possible the cosmic belt zone seen by WMAP implies cosmic spin, and this would imply torque forces and more complexity of the ripples seen, yet the data so far shows simplicity. You might say, comic cosmology rules. Hyperinflation allows a simple wave seen since the bubble expansion smooths out the geometry. CJ Cosmology makes the same general prediction since the shear forces of the jet would explain the simplicity of the waves seen too. The "sides" as in the image are not a disk and can't be explained by the impact of the bubbles.. I think they may be caused by the red shift of the field flowing more in our line of site, as the jet flows more sideways above us since we aren't in the center, the displacement of the light would reduce the temperature we see. While the jet is regular, it's not symmetrical all around as the bubble would have. CJ Cosmology makes other predictions the bubbles won't and may also solve the problem of when the cosmos was created. If eternal, it seems more creative..
By F=ma, not the less general Emc2, the motion of smaller bodies around galaxies might be used to map the force between galaxies. Emc2 says there is more mass of a heavy body, and more energy. So when the same force is applied to a heavy and a light mass they should both move at the same speed, heavy and light are equal in Relativity. Mass doesn't enter into the equation of fall in the Earth's field, so Einstein believed it was space itself that controls gravity, either the mass or the earth is in equivalent motion, it doesn't matter which.
If there is a magnetic force powering the cosmic expansion or even acceleration, it will act on charged galaxies and lighter masses in different ways in GWD for the lower energy fields. A lighter galaxy will move a bit faster with the radiance outward, one with more charge yet faster, and a heavy light galaxy with no charge will have the most inertia and so move in the most linear way all else held the same. These three components may help map out the force powering the cosmic radiance.
Impacting bubbles in time imply complexity as in ripples. No ripples are yet seen though they should have been by impacting bubbles. Also the asymmetrical spin of galaxies is relatively complex, and moderate complexity is involved in CJ Cosmology too because of spin not completely via the stretching of the world lines of the linear motion reducing angular motion though not completely nearby us in the jet on our side. Einstein's idea has more complexity via stability over time, (and a simple radiance and expansion being in balance so no round zone as in the image so Einstein's cosmology in a simple form seems disproven) and so do impacting bubbles via the ripples. Impacting bubbles imply more complexity if the resonant fossil wave has had plenty of time to resonate and vibrate. A constant of expansion plus some angular momentem nearer us has moderate complexity as observed, as in the sheets of galaxies, the Great Wall, and so on. In general in CJ Cosmology there are the jets, the one jet near us that would the cause of the symmetrical round zone seen, and the more distant asymmetry of the cosmic equator, to balance the expansion and then conserve energy by the inward motion of the disc. Any spin of galaxies implies disproof of Inflation Cosmology, and a slower radiance would be found with finite jets. The spins of the galaxies imply the radiance like in a jet is assymetrical, and by no means perfectly smooth as in inflation cosmology.
The spin of the cosmos nearby might be much smaller than a method like Einstein used to explain how we haven't imploded to the center. If the universe is balanced both in and out, where's all the spin? In general there is spin at the cosmic disc in CJ Cosmology, and this is distant. A jet near us would be via linear travel as we radiate out to reach the cosmic plane and it would have just some spin, though not a lot. Inflation cosmology predicts no spin, Einstein's idea predicts lots of spin, and CJ Cosmology predicts just some spin as observed, and because we may be at the center of the jet, CJC predicts the spin axis is parallel to our travel outward.
OTHER PREDICTIONS, THOUGH NOT MORE OF ALL THERE IS! Of COSMIC JET COSMOLOGY
It's believed the Wilkensen Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) which show the cleanest
map yet of the cosmic microwave background or CMB, may imply Guth's cosmic inflation was the start of a chain reaction of other bubble universes. See this page for more about Guth's idea. WMAP shows a round simple cosmic circle with regular "sides" of the cosmos, Click here for image. Tufts University astronomer Alex Vilenken believes in this, and NYU researchers Spencer Chang, Thomas Levi, and Matthew Kleban say "If the two bubble universes impacted, the impact zone would be in the shape of a circle, and the pulse of energy from this circular zone would travel into our bubble like a shock wave, where it would presumably leave a disk like imprint on the microwave background". Kleban predicted that the light may be polarized in special angles in two concentric rings of the disk.
My belief is another view of both cosmology and cosmogony, I've named Cosmic Jet Cosmology, or CJC. I use more familiar physics seen in astronomy of the jets that are of stars and more massive bodies the highest energy seen of any masses of the universe. In this cosmology, it may be of related high energy events. The observed Hubble radiant outward travel of the galaxies might be mostly inside one of the jets, where we are, the other perhaps yet too distant to see. In CJC the jets then move out to the cosmic equator which would also explain this feature found by WMAP, though not by Kleban's explanation. Bubbles would be radiant and spherical, spin would involve a zone like this band of galaxies, not bubbles. In CJC the jets from the source of radiance like the galaxies while scaled up more in higher power, could then spill over to the plane of the cosmos, the cosmic equator then might implode the matter back from the plane to the center of the jets where it's recycled by the gravity to reradiate via the jets in infinite cycles of radiance and implosion conserving energy and powered by gravity.
The Sloan sky survey seems to show that more galaxies are spinning counterclockwise in the N hemisphere than they would by inflation cosmology. The S hemisphere survey is in progress to see if it is also with clockwise spins of the galaxies. As on this page it seems anamalous the Milky Way is spinning with spin axis highly aligned with the direction of the cosmic expansion seen. This seems to be definite evidence against a completely smooth era of inflation expansion as in Guth's cosmology.
OTHER OBJECTIONS TO GUTH'S INFLATION COSMOLOGY
Inflation Expansion cosmology was the most published idea in cosmology by researchers in the early 1980's. However, CJ Cosmology may be better to explain the cosmos, since in CJ Cosmology energy is conserved via recycling of the energy jets to plane and rewinding up via gravity, and a simple spherical Big Bang created out of nothing would violate energy conservation. Another problem with Inflation Expansion that CJC allows more solution for is about the short period of hyperinflation that Guth used to explain the general smoothness of the microwave radiation (except for the lower energy fossil found by WMAP. And perhaps the possible spin of the cosmos.) What caused the hyperinflation and why it stopped are neither explained in Inflation Cosmology. There are no known physics involved, and this is completely to be accepted on faith in Inflation Cosmology. Where ultimate cosmology is from we may say. These two problems of inflation expansion have not been much considered.
In CJ Cosmology the cause of the general smoothness is only that the slow speed of light via electromagnetism can't connect up the galaxies at great distances and only the weaker force of gravity being faster than light could connect even inside the jet. Indeed I use the regularity of the sides and central zone as evidence that gravity being lighter than light may be faster than light. Only the weaker force of gravity being faster than light could connect inside the jets. My hopeful generalization of Maxwell's idea that was forgotten with the goings on of Relativity is the method he used to predict the speed of light exactly based on the resilience (density) of the field. If gravity is lighter than light it may move faster than light, you lighten up to travel faster. The question here I would still ask is "how did Maxwell do this" hardly a coincidence it seems.. Though my explanation I call General Wave Dynamics, may not be as dramatic as relativity, it's possible GWD may give us new science like in astronomy, high speed communications, or finding advanced civilizations faster, or computers, and how gravity works, by finding the deeper truth. Here's my GWD synopsis or see the link upper left of the page. In CJ Cosmology and GWD gravity is lower energy and longer acting, and thus the microwaves are smoother than by relativity. If gravity is at the speed of light, thermodynamic entropy like via the speed of light wouldn't hold the cosmos together..
If the fields are in a continuous loop of eternal motion powered by gravity like the world would spin if left in the cosmos as a system, there might be a more electromagnetic cause of expansion and radiance too as I say on my site about Cosmic Jet Cosmology . As in the huge magnetic fields found between the galaxies, and perhaps the Cosmic jets being of ionized charge would attract the plane of the cosmos, causing cosmic acceleration, also unexplained in Kleban's view or Inflation Expansion, and so on. CJ Cosmology saves energy conservation and the same mechanism causing the jets of galaxies might be used to solve the Hubble radiance that vexed Einstein and caused him to invent the Einstein cosmological constant. To me Einstein seems to have believed in a deeper truth in cosmology.
The WMAP would be explained as looking at the center of the cosmic jet on our side as in the same general result as bubble cosmology. CJC predicts a related mirrorlike image seen on the other side, looking inward to the center of the cosmos. Here we might see another low energy image with the same central zone except to a different degree since it's in expansion too, though not at the higher rate of speed of the outer cosmic radiance.
I have three scenarios for bubble impacts if Guth is correct;
Either a bubbble might impact and continue in, leaving a lot of matter to find yet this hasn't been seen just the much lower energy WMAP.
Or it could could bounce off and leave even more energy, also "off the WMAP".
Thus it might be stationary relative to our universe with a standing wave.
The problem with all there is here is about the simplicity of the central circle and sides, especially in the third situation, which may seem most probable. An impact would seem to have more complex waves and ripples that wash around the outside of the bubbles, not just two, especially if it's a standing wave. In CJ Cosmology I imagine it's possible the cosmic belt zone seen by WMAP implies cosmic spin, and this would imply torque forces and more complexity of the ripples seen, yet the data so far shows simplicity. You might say, comic cosmology rules. Hyperinflation allows a simple wave seen since the bubble expansion smooths out the geometry. CJ Cosmology makes the same general prediction since the shear forces of the jet would explain the simplicity of the waves seen too. The "sides" as in the image are not a disk and can't be explained by the impact of the bubbles.. I think they may be caused by the red shift of the field flowing more in our line of site, as the jet flows more sideways above us since we aren't in the center, the displacement of the light would reduce the temperature we see. While the jet is regular, it's not symmetrical all around as the bubble would have. CJ Cosmology makes other predictions the bubbles won't and may also solve the problem of when the cosmos was created. If eternal, it seems more creative..
By F=ma, not the less general Emc2, the motion of smaller bodies around galaxies might be used to map the force between galaxies. Emc2 says there is more mass of a heavy body, and more energy. So when the same force is applied to a heavy and a light mass they should both move at the same speed, heavy and light are equal in Relativity. Mass doesn't enter into the equation of fall in the Earth's field, so Einstein believed it was space itself that controls gravity, either the mass or the earth is in equivalent motion, it doesn't matter which.
If there is a magnetic force powering the cosmic expansion or even acceleration, it will act on charged galaxies and lighter masses in different ways in GWD for the lower energy fields. A lighter galaxy will move a bit faster with the radiance outward, one with more charge yet faster, and a heavy light galaxy with no charge will have the most inertia and so move in the most linear way all else held the same. These three components may help map out the force powering the cosmic radiance.
Impacting bubbles in time imply complexity as in ripples. No ripples are yet seen though they should have been by impacting bubbles. Also the asymmetrical spin of galaxies is relatively complex, and moderate complexity is involved in CJ Cosmology too because of spin not completely via the stretching of the world lines of the linear motion reducing angular motion though not completely nearby us in the jet on our side. Einstein's idea has more complexity via stability over time, (and a simple radiance and expansion being in balance so no round zone as in the image so Einstein's cosmology in a simple form seems disproven) and so do impacting bubbles via the ripples. Impacting bubbles imply more complexity if the resonant fossil wave has had plenty of time to resonate and vibrate. A constant of expansion plus some angular momentem nearer us has moderate complexity as observed, as in the sheets of galaxies, the Great Wall, and so on. In general in CJ Cosmology there are the jets, the one jet near us that would the cause of the symmetrical round zone seen, and the more distant asymmetry of the cosmic equator, to balance the expansion and then conserve energy by the inward motion of the disc. Any spin of galaxies implies disproof of Inflation Cosmology, and a slower radiance would be found with finite jets. The spins of the galaxies imply the radiance like in a jet is assymetrical, and by no means perfectly smooth as in inflation cosmology.
The spin of the cosmos nearby might be much smaller than a method like Einstein used to explain how we haven't imploded to the center. If the universe is balanced both in and out, where's all the spin? In general there is spin at the cosmic disc in CJ Cosmology, and this is distant. A jet near us would be via linear travel as we radiate out to reach the cosmic plane and it would have just some spin, though not a lot. Inflation cosmology predicts no spin, Einstein's idea predicts lots of spin, and CJ Cosmology predicts just some spin as observed, and because we may be at the center of the jet, CJC predicts the spin axis is parallel to our travel outward.
OTHER PREDICTIONS, THOUGH NOT MORE OF ALL THERE IS! Of COSMIC JET COSMOLOGY
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)