Why We Are Merely Amazin, With More Mass!

Heaviside and others in the late 1800's were thinking of building a machine to send a wave faster than light in the same venue as a sign with your name up in lights has apparent motion at much "faster than light". You see on the web on some sites where the machine has recently been built, and would have been built then if Einstein's relativity hadn't been so influental those who were going to build the machine abandoned their research, assuming it was not of value to continue.

I believe there is still no "electromagnetic" signal moving faster than light inside the Heaviside machine. Even so there may be a way to make use this type of machine also about the possibility of faster than light wave motion. As I say here there are several lines of evidence in what I call GWD, General Wave Dynamics that lead to the possibility of faster than light for gravity. (For instance as I say on the link, new low energy observations at the largest cosmic scales the cosmos has "regular sides" which I take to be evidence that gravity may be faster than light because it's lighter than light. The only two long range forces known at cosmic scales are electromagnetism and gravity and light is too slow to unify the "ears". (The cosmos rings like a bell, but this is another story.) The evidence for the light speed of gravity believed by some to be needed to explain the slowing of the pulsars may be because of the assumptions of General Relativity being built into the calculations so much they may be assuming what they were trying to prove about this, after all does anyone really understand GR? If so why haven't those doing the calculations noticed that GR holds that all masses fall at the same rate and then the contradiction that the orbit of Mercury and other "predictions based on this" are actually based on changing not constant rates of fall, the foundation needed to make gravity relativistic so it's speed would be at the speed of light would be achieved.

Therefore I think it's possible gravity waves may be faster than light. Einstein's prediction of the existence of gravity waves my soon be proven by either methods I describe on my page using atomic clocks or by the new IP machines that use heavy nuclear resonations and accelerations to both send and receive the gravity waves at the known mass density, more massive than the waves inside the pulsars to hopefully make and measure the waves.

The first assumption that faster than light is possible leads to a problem; scientists have despaired over ever finding gravity waves in the past because the energy is so low and the frequency so high it has seemed impossible to find the feeble wave among all the rest of the higher energy changes in the mass nearby.

Thus even if experiments may soon prove the speed of the gravity itself, by general methods like atomic clocks or the nuclear resonance, we may be able to prove the speed but like two large ships sensing lots of small waves between them that slowly build up the ship, the individual waves may be far too feeble to find if the much slower ships of electromagnetic charges are the heavy particles of the IP machine...The matter waves themselves may be at another wavelength and at higher speed to reduce interaction with the electric charges and relativity's electromagnetic speed of light, it's by the sudden phase shift that would jump the quantum well and change to what myself and others believe may be a superfluid, ect, for the lower energy field to move FTL, ect as I say on my synopsis page (if I spelled synopses in latin no ixnay, to spelling beatrice!)

No doubt we would be able to send information at whatever speed the waves allow with the machine just by accelerating the heavy particles as they say on the site about the new machine. Even so if the waves are much faster than light there would the possibility of huge increases of bandwidth in the signal rather than "mere light". This is where I wonder a bit; first, gravity and the matter waves are faster than light. Second, another of Einstein's ideas, the low energy particle he assumes to get around the Uncertainty Principle may exist. If not, why wouldn't more mass occupy more room not less as the Uncertainty Principle holds, all around is proof of Einstein being aware of mass. A low energy particle wouldn't add so much mass as you measure them so they don't gain infinite mass from the observing particle, a smaller mass around us has less size, not more.

If Einstein was correct about the low energy particle this would be of worth to build a machine to measure the waves at higher bandwidth and recent low energy physics experiments seem to prove he was more correct.

Time is not infinitely divisible or it wouldn't be stable. If it's unlimited in resolution this is because time is not derived from the higher energy fields of subatomic physics, or we would have already found the limit, the limit of mass for each particle is easy to find, not the time, thus the continuity of the space and time down to the subatomic level is from another cause, the matter field, and this itself must be stable to make the rest of the fields, mass and energy, space and time stable.

If we line up "Einstein's" electromagnetic particles (or particles like the neutron still with internal electric charges) in rows like wires by doing something like ionizing them by perhaps something like "boiling" them off other particles they make up and condensing them on a substrate or perhaps resonating them in tube like for a laser, if the individual motion of each particle could be perhaps measured electromagnetically by multiplying up the small motion of each particle as the high speed wave of the field passes through we might then be able to measure not only the individual waves much better, because of the high frequency of the waves we might be able to measure time with much higher precision, the particles being more like a beach ball or wave machine like used to save lives at 200 mph than a giant ship, so their motion might be more measurable. The frequency may be extremely high because the wavelength of gravity in general would reach the subatomic realm to interact so much with it; thus with the super high speed of GWD, the short wavelength of this realm of the spectrum might make the frequency much higher, of use perhaps to then measure time well.
.
Those who measure time say there's no theoretical limit to how much more we can measure time with higher resolution. The problem here is, like infinite wheels in wheels, if time were infinitely divisible, it would be infinite, so there must be a real actual stable limit of the divisibility of time. If a body in motion were moving through infinitely divisible time at the point of infinite division the time would be 0 and the motion would not take place for the moving body, reductio ad absurdarn. If this limit were found by usual electromagnetism or other subatomic physics, the limit would have already been found. Space and time are completely continuous in the subatomic realm, yet there must be a stable foundation if all around there is stability. In GWD, space and time are actually not continuous at the scale of the lower energy. The particles only seem continuous due to their high speed and frequency. We couldn't seem to find unlimited divisibility of time in subatomic physics if the quanta are the foundation because they are unchanging. More divisibility yet would mean a lower energy foundation and this itself would have to be stable and if it's so this could be the limit to the divisibility of time. Unlike known subatomic physics there might need to be a limit for stability. In subatomic physics, this might seem to be resistance to spinning around at faster than like by quanta of spin, small clocks that spin might thus resist more motion thus even with theoretical infinite divisability, so the actual practical limit like that of the higher energy particles might seem to be limited by the resistance of the field or the speed of light. If so like the particle's masses we would have already found it. The continuity of space and time are not quanta, so they may be derived from another level of continuous energy than the quanta, the realm of the matter waves.


This may mean if we might eventually build a machine of the low energy particles Einstein believed in, and send the high speed wave through it generated by the nuclear machine we could perhaps measure time with much higher precision than via atomic clocks. Like atomic clocks themselves, the higher precision possible might be found by sampling the signal from this "graviton clock" at intervals with the atomic clock, to check for reliable timing like via atomic clocks with the quartz clock, except at higher frequency.

You may say, right, there are low energy physics known and there are no lower energy real particles than the photon or neutrino, all lower energy particles are not found. If the particle isn't stable there may be no way to make the wires, boil the particles and so on. It seems possible that these particles can be stable, because they would be the lower energy foundation on which all the rest is built, if the photon is stable the particles that make it up are near enough in energy to be nearly stable too at any rate, especially if the Uncertainty Principle isn't true and these particles like Einstein believed could get around the Uncertainty Principle, by this they are low energy and perhaps more particulate than a wave via the Uncertainty Principle would allow.

If the low energy particles Einstein believed in aren't found, another way to use the low nuclear wave machine may be to send out the wave. If it's faster than light, to make use of the bandwidth an array of the sensors might be used; a wave also faster than light at 90 degees with resonation at the same general energy of the machine could be used that sends the image of the wavelets of the primary wave by like resonation at the same general energy and then finds the sensors of the array, like lighting up the cinema lights and perhaps all our names up in faster than lights, in AR, and more! Even though none of the "ships" of the heavy particles themselves can go faster than light, the signal could perhaps measure the faster than light sub components of the matter wave. Due to relativity and it's electromagnetic speed of light, the particles of the machine like heavy particles can't move faster than light, even a neutron has an inner charge as evidenced by its small magnetic field (the two charges combined to make it aren't exactly equal in GWD because matter and antimatter would be the same if relativity and subatomic physics were both true as Dirac predicted, and the former seems more general because e.g. it has a large number of things SR can't predict, all this arises in GWD because of faster than light spin, the cause of higher mass than the electron, and SR and all the rest might be derived from GWD but not SR if mass is spinning energy.).


This improvement of the IP machine would first give us the possibility of an extreme precision in our clocks not found in atomic clocks. and by reversing the process, so the timer makes each sensor in the array actuate the signal at the right time if faster than light we could then send the signal itself via the higher number of cycles per second by moving the heavy particles in synchronization at short distances with great force if each sensor is connected to a generator that sends the bit. And an array of sensors themselves would be used to find the high speed signal using the same timing method in reverse to both time send and recieve the signal.. Even if by relativity, no heavy particle can move faster than light, the machine might solve this by the method of the cinema sign with my name when I read with my visors on! The problem of the signal needing time to build up between the sensor and the array might be solved by increasing the pressure on each side of the sensors, rather like the steering of a car. The two forces on each side of your hand as you drive are in balance so you can control the more powerful signal by a smaller force to amplify the signal.

Unlike the lighter resonation of Einstein's particle this may have an ultimate limit by Einstein's other belief about relativity because there's a limit to the amount of strong force that can be caused by compression to overpower the resistance of the inertia of the field and the speed of light and relativity. This would be reached as the distance is shorter and more force is added, even so there is only so much strong force there, the matter waves are lower energy and relativity is strong. Thus in this version of the machine the method to speed up the signal if it's possible may be to build ever larger arrays.

....