A Giant Solar Windmill, Airships Are Up!

....~~~

The search was on for a way to send data on the field around power wires and about 5 years ago (as in Popular Science) a solution was found to reach all computers via the field around power wires to reach each house would use just a 10 watt laser for connection to all the people in the US via broadband. Innovator Beth S says because the fields are large around the wires, perhaps some way to absorb the summer heat by way of the broad field might be a good way to add more power to the grid, or boost the power there without loss of power for distance, a sort of giant cheap collector that's already mostly ready for 2079. Ways are used to convert the inflow of heat to currents flowing with the wires and then the current generates power by usual methods.

--

Others look to magnetic bubbles, giant loops of field that may be set on two generators above the Earth. The loops would be like a giant turbine that would move by power of the solar flow outward of particles. To make the machines not drift further out with time, part of the power would be used to sail upstream, even with the fraction used for this to hold 'er steady, this may be larger solar power overall than any other machine because of the giant size of the machine at much higher value/money spent to build it.. The field expands and takes up more room to be a giant sail without the price being so high. To power the generators part of the power flow of heat also could be of value. The energised magnetic field flows into one pole and as it moves past the wire generates power, a simple electric motor, with the extra power beamed to nearby collectors. To not have to continually sail upstream, two asteroids that are of constant distance from each other might be of value. Another possibility may be to stretch the field away from the solar heat or send the giant loops towards the solar flux and then use the field compression to power machines nearer the earth. It's believed magnetic loops may make solar airplanes and other machines more viable by using a much larger solar collecter per dollar and per unit of weight of the plane.

My mom is living in Europe to author more books. She has a European cat named Frantichec, How do we know this is a cat with high culture? Simple, we know this because when he sez hi to others he rolls purrs with an R!

...--

Why Isn't The Electron Infinite As Einstein Believed?
..
The equivalent motion of either the electron or the gravitational field near the earth through it would mean by speeding up at the usual rate of 32 ft the electron would be at the speed of light in just months. Einstein believed the electron might actually weigh more mass with time but old electrons are actually measured to have the same mass. They would be moved to higher and higher speeds if motion via the field were equvalent and have huge mass approaching c if general relativity were correct and the earth would have huge mass augumentation, so I hold that this is a disproof of general relativity.

Even if we may say let's go to Ohio, if we wait for Ohio to go to us we may have a lot longer wait! To say the field flows through mass is not equivalent to Einstein's belief that the earth is moving up to meet the field as if with millions of giant rockets (if so, where are they?) because if you have two masses and the same force is used to accelerate them the lighter mass gives way, only by the arbitrary assumption that you add that much more force to the greater mass, and reduced force to the light mass is the motion the same. Force not motion is what's of higher worth. If the same amount of power is used to lift two masses, the lighter mass is lifted higher, drop them both and the lighter mass falls faster at another speed. It's more valid to say force is what unifies the heavy and light masses than motion because even if special relativity is about unchanging linear motion which is about some of physics, force is about 2nd or higher (nonlinear) power derivatives which causes more change in the same amount of time. As I say in my elevator causology about how Maxwell and Einstein may be reconciled. if Maxwell predicted the speed of light well based on the belief in the density of a resilient medium, the ether, and the force between electric charges being the same would have the speed of light the same where is the field a high speed elevator would plough through and stop? My solution to reconcile Einstein and Maxwell both about this is via the ultimate cosmic elevator (always well to reach a Merry Maid.) The electric charges would be like the weight and counter weight of the elevator and the wires would be the light. The tension between the elevator and weight would keep the elevator in linear motion and the speed of light constant with the given weight and motion of the elevator, so the field is really there like the air around us that weighs a ton per foot, in this it's just well balanced so in the rest frame of the starship elevator like the air no force is felt. Even so the internal resilience would be what keeps the elevator or a starship in motion. Like the wires of the elevator there would be force inside the field lines that's not applied externally till more force is added to the high speed mass or it stops or reaches the elevator starship station (this implies internal motion of the waves within the light to maintain the wires, and this by definition would be faster than light, otherwise it couldn't outdistance the light to cause the changes in redshift via the information at just the speed of light.). I'm saying this about the elevator because while it may seem force and motion are the same without my way to explain both Maxwell's speed of light and Einstein's empty space and time via weights and counterweights of uniform motion, it seems you can have motion without force if balanced via the wires and so motion alone would seem to win out via just Relativity. But if the force is the source of motion of the cosmic elevator and is the cause of 2nd or higher power motion, all motion is unified by force (even if internal in Special Relativity) and force is of more import. In GWD (General wave Dynamics) the force is there in special relativity, it's just acting within the realm of the quanta of the electric charges unable to make it over the energy wall of the electrons with ease. Even so light can be changed so with effort the field within the field would be changed. If you have a field like the air around the starship/elevator and you change the speed more 2nd power force is seen and radiation is emitted. Thus if all is unified by force not just motion when the starship acclelerates real energy would be exchanged with the field nearby with at least some braking radiation from the direction of motion, not just the radiation of the starships motors. Obviously this prediction of my causology in GWD, if proof of the ether would not be possible with Einstein's belief that space and time were just empty. This could be the return of the ether wave theory of light.

You often hear many who say that with all his glory Einstein somhow defeated the ether but for all the praise of Einstein the evidence for waves in subatomic physics has not been easy for them to edit by way of Special Relativity alone. You read of others who not only award him laurels for having disproven the ether and waves in science, they also praise him for having proven that subatomic physics was both discontinous, and continuous like waves in the duality of subatomic physics that were eventually proven by more evidence. Einstein believed Special Relativity was about discontinuous quanta of photons. With uniform motion being the only physics it describes well, the speed of light is constant so there is no change in the wavelength of the light, Einstein believed this was because the light was without interaction between where it was emitted and the high speed observer when absorbed. No interaction is discontinuous so Einstein said many times that he believed light was a particle. He won the Nobel Prize not for Special Relativity, but for the foundation of (discontinuous) quantum physics. A whole world of physicists in the 1800's spent their life proving the worth of the ether and before that people not so much more saavy and with more money than even that lady on Millionaire believed in all the motifs, perhaps 30 or 40 of them that are possible via the wave theory of light and no other. (Here in the year 2008 I sleep in wave number beds and win swim marathons!)


As I say about my disproof of General Relativity the electron in the lab machines is here at rest and not of infinite mass so the field is in motion, "The Earth is at rest and not the field" just as many were saying. People always thought the most natural way was mass at be at rest, then with Newton with a bit of enlightenment deigned that the force was not the most of worth. "A body remains in motion unless acted upon by an outside force". If gravity is an implosive force and the more mass you have the more at rest it is (the Sun is more at rest than the Earth, the Earth is more at rest than the Moon) and force like the acceleration of gravity is of more value, I would revise Newton's law to say that
..
Masses tend to slow down and remain at rest more often than not but if force is applied enough for them move away from forces like gravity in more linear motion, only then they tend to remain in motion unless acted on by the outside force.
..
Even so because all forces speak gravity and no other language is universal to energy conservation and because particles being discontinuous have contradictions that waves like Einstein's gravity waves don't (and gravity would be a wave mostly because waves not particles continuously attract) and for other reasons (if gravity doesn't hold the cosmos together more with force of implosion than outward motion how could we be here with energy conservation causing the cosmos to have existed forever? This may seem to be using energy conservation (of infinite time) to disprove energy conservation with gravity the prime mover, but not necessarily if gravity at longer range and lower energy actually is winding up the cosmos, a definite necessity if it otherwise seems to be winding down about entropy, only in more common physics around us and subatomic physics, would energy conservation actually hold). I believe if gravity is more general, the idea that rest, and tendancy to rest is more important than Newton's system where uniform motion without change is more of worth. Otherwise why does all the mass around us slow on the Earth's surface to a stop radially and not just continue in uniform motion indefinitely? The Earth is continually squeezing out force of mass without stopping (it's implosive so the electron mass is stable at the Earth's surface by balance of the forces with constant field flowing through it right at that point and not with acceleration like Einstein believed.). Energy is of more worth than just inertia. Behaviour that causes real change is more important in the systems of the evolution of behaviour than any other, in philosophy inertia is considered by may to be a cause more of evil than good.

I may have an easier labor than Einstein may have had to win over the physics world to GWD because while Special Relativity is well proven I believe it's not the whole or more general truth about physics, a tribute to Einstein for having won about special relativity no doubt, but perhaps even better about a more mechanical causology like mine.
...
The main power of special relativity seems that even if if it seems without common sense like a machine, it's general. All physics including gravity and the other forces gravitate to the all important speed of light of special relativity and thus by way of electromagnetism all that's controlled by the constant electric charges is controlled by special relativity. Even so, Special Relativity seems to me to be like a sort of physics of kinematics without description of cause of motion, my belief is that only with real force like gravity and the strong force are the causes of motion and force well encompassed.

PHYSICS SYNOPSES
--