Wouldn't it be great to go out on a summer day and not hear the noise of a demolition team tearing up the road? There have been ways out of this devised including a jackhammer with a shield over the cutter at the road that seals out the noise, they even have a hammer that is a sort of clamp to reach over the window or wall top and improve the concrete silently by clamping it, and this has been applied to road machines to first use the weight of the truck which the hammer is well connected with. The mass of the machine presses down into the concrete and then the hammer clamps in to the road like the usual wall clamp using the pressure of the weight of the truck to achieve enough force to make a big enough dent in the road to then be able to quietly clamp the concrete. Another innovation to reach into the concrete for walls is to drill into the wall with two drill bits with counterrotation and then the bits themselves or parallel bits or other clamps in the holes drilled disentigrate the room or other stuff. Unlike the truck mounted clamp the inventor says this is portable and lightweight, and no doubt it could be used in place of the truck mounted machine. This is somewhat loud but much quieter than a conventional hammer of this sort and faster in labor so the overall sound is lower because it just takes 15 minutes to demolish what was a 2 hour labor before.

..

.
..There is the new idea of the skyscraper used in the urban areas for agriculture and aquaculture. Some people may want fresh produce right away, if it's on sale from Brand Y at 49th floors and 87 cents. The problem here is if land is cheaper in the country, and it always will be, why not just build it there? This way more people will move to the country even if nobody lives in the country!
--

Should Historians Make Moral Judgments?

...Ponders author Henry Steele Commager In the book "A Sense of History"...
-
He first notes that many of the ancients and most of the 16th and 17th century historians thought it was good to make moral judgements, and they thought themselves just and great for having done so.

He then goes on with a list of four main arguments against the use of moral judgements by historians;

1 The persons of history are not able in the 21st century AD to have their say about their deeds and their day in court so it's not of worth to judge them since impartial and just is the way to be the best.

-
2.The historian is a professional like a teacher and evaluations are allowed, but if a teacher made the same judgements plus a moral judgement, their skill wouldn't be considered of worth and they would lose their job.

3.The historian is not a god so we can't be sure of his judgement.

4. The reader already is aware to read a great author (like the author they were reading no doubt!) so they already will have highly evolved enough opinions about history and enough information and savvy to decide on their own.

From these four conclusions Commager then deigns the goal of the historians is in essence to just list the evidence, plus comments about the events. More insubstantial, safe conclusions about the conduct of say Churchill on one day in his life, Phillip the II, or Edison the I are allowed. There is to be no large scale judgement in history-old fashioned.

While many would praise the great deeds and heros in history, Commager's main question seems to be about the judgements of the other "bad" times of old history. It's obvious about the episodes such as the Conquest of Mexico by Cortes, these are about weapons used badly by people against the less fortunate people. An imbalance in the social order caused by weapons the other side was lacking in caused injustice. You may say, what about the persecution of Christians by the Ancient Romans or the Jews in World War II and other events of this type in history? This doesn't seem to have been caused any more by weapons than just people choosing it who were in power, some say the oppressors chose it so they should be judged. It's true judgement is not all bad but it's better to solve the cause of a problem than to blame. It would be the boost of all boosts if there were less bad history, if we find ways to improve history, historians may have the most boost of anyone. It's true the misuse of weapons by man against man is the cause of much of the bad history, but a second much larger "unknown" bad use of weapons in history has been by man against evolution, this may also be used to explain all these second types of "bad" times in history (not just weapons used badly by relatively healthy individuals such as the conquistadors conquest of Peru) when the overpopulation was higher including the modern problems such as the economic depression of the 1930's. As in ancient times, and more recent times after the 1600's first the weapons were used against evolution, this caused a rise in the number of people like in ancient Rome and Greece. This at first would seem to be an excess advantage used against evolution. But "advantages" like this are not common in evolution, so the motif of first excess then deficit would take place. The increased population would have increased Competition for Decreased Resources, causing strain and reduction of the overcrowding by way of Supply and Demand. I believe if we reduce our numbers/unit land these days so we would buy enough relief by this method, we could actually reduce the overpopulation, not just change the density with more time. People aren't ready to reduce, it would be more burden yet, sort of like losing fat. They find this increases risk of death many times, and the young people are most able to diet, so if weight reduction wasn't much common in evolution because of no tempting lunch, and most were healthy so were never overweight, (because we didn't evolve overweight) evolution would consider diets to be stressful and the older people would have more risk thereof. So too overpopulation was absent in evolution, and for now just reducing the burden of too much competition for reduced resources would be the most strengthening. Once the world was made stronger by reduced density, then we could consider more active (peaceful) reduction of the overpopulation.

That what people have done to evolution is not moderate and so may cause more harm than good is why weapons whether used against people or evolution can be used to explain all the bad times of history (other than plagues and famines, and so on.). These would be the only two causes of the illness and this sort of problem wasn't found in evolution for millions of years, because life science shows disease to be virtually absent in living evolution. After all both types of use of weapons, against others and against evolution are the most extreme behavour in all of history. The same motif of evolution's balance would be involved in modern times causing problems like World War II. Click Here for my complete causology of OVERPOPULATION, EVOLUTION AND ITS HISTORIC INFLUENCE.

The Four reasons to undeign morality of Historians abridged are

1.Others In History Before Us Aren't Able to Say Their Side Of It
2. Non Professional
3.Not a God
and 4.The Reader is Already Smart

About 1st of the four reasons that the ancients or others should be allowed to have their day in the witness stand and thus Commager's conclusion that moral judgement would be bad, this may be unimportant because the ancients are asleep for the time being and we may think of them as a reflection and mirror of our life here and now to learn about us. Life insurance is not just for calm people, it's a boost for business!

The 2nd objection to historians making moral judgments is about the distinction between history and authorship. If it's just history and like a judge or coach without moral boosts why should history be science and art more than just science? One reason is because history is us in the highest realms, it's all the lives of millions of people will be, it isn't just a reflection, it's twice all the world. Unimportant to them in 100 BC perhaps, but of worth to us the living. I would think one good reason to think of history as both science and creativity is because the historians of the good times like ancient Rome or the 1600s have seemed to think it should be so and they were good about so much it would seem they were right about this too. The civilization was more healthy in those times so while this is just a based on probability, so is most of life. So the use of appeal to some authority is not always without worth. Who doesn't have a boss some time in their life, Mom would have fired me on March 35th if I stayed out late!

About whether historians should be moral, I liken this to asking if Shakespeare would have been better authorizing just the science of events, or should he also add on his own inspirational vision? Or to put it in another way, since life is competition, should teams like in sports have cheerleader squads? I separate this into two motifs; A, The health of the teams and B, the boosters, this would be the judgement or moralizing of the older historians. When are boosts of worth to the team?

-In the 3rd reason on the list (The Historian is not a god) to not be a moralist if a historian, Commager speaks of the "bad" historians who used their own opinions to justify nationalistic, chauvinist or militaristic motifs. Generally the type of rhetoric the historians sometimes have used to these type of aims like in communist nations is generally not of worth to most people as much as a more healthy sort of use of the good words. If the team is fighting against us and is unhealthy too, then the team boosts tend to be more against us than for us. This may be why Commager and other modern historians seem to be lowering their goals to the level of just reported history. If they can't rely on others generally because of increased demand with reduced supply of resources and room caused by unfair treatment of evolution, pep would be discouraged, even though in the time of the Elizabethans it was considered to be worth more. If the health of the teams are sound then so may be the boost. The general health of civilization seems as I say to usually be associated with the immoral use of weapons in history whether to people or evolution. If so the health of the teams is of worth to improve by stopping or phasing out use of weapons somehow, and reducing the levels of persons per unit room by more people moving to the suburbs. If enough people were living by evolution we would be like my old competitions where we had the force of Co Ed for us not against us. It would be like a dream or falling asleep, with each go round of the stimulus we go calmer and calmer, more and more asleep, till finally the world could be in triumph by way of real rest. We read about this musician in the 1600's who had this plan to convince the royals to use music well in order to stop war and save the country. He didn't achieve it, but we go to sleep often twice in 24 hours, and go asleep a minute early if we all dream, we could stop war. If this is not the way it is it's what I dream of. You may say, we can't go back, weapons and bad technology are here to stay. But we use technology all the time that causes no harm and makes us feel good, when you read this awesome site, you are! You may say, you know misuse of weapons is bad, I know weapons is bad, but to do They? What I'm saying here it's not bad to fight like a dog needs to bark, just that it's of worth for us now to fight so efficiently we win by reducing out weapons generally more with each go round, including convincing the enemy to reduce his weapons likewise because of the worth of the wisdom of doing so at this time in history, sort of like one Santa who asks another, "So what do you do for a living the other 364?" and the other says, "You may be unaware, I'm in biz for the most folk revel in the world!" While the ancient greeks were a high civilization in the history of the world, they had common sense too. The golden rule seems to make the best business sense, what's called patience is actually changing the real problem without blame while accentuating the positive about the look of what's going on. If we have enough cause and are smart we can solve a lot with all our tricks, I like what's up most. Goodness is not inaction. It's waiting for the hour to do what's the best, in the best way possible, as often as is of worth. The problem of the weapons are the why, and once we find the why, the how is easier to find in much of life, being good may be our salvation, it always was most for the ages. To not eat meat often is my way of life, no more than was in evolution and not to be a hunter, it seems like a good or great deed to the world to abstain to moderate levels. Other options to reduce harm to the ecology are by reducing consumption of most goods and I cherish what is of use more months to years to conserve the environment and reduce demand. Since the strain that's common in the cities these days may be caused by the overpopulation and urbanization, it may be far better for us and the world to move to the suburbs where research shows the civilization is most healthy. Dreams like the above for the world are easier to achieve if silence is golden, the truth abounds in quiet rooms. (If you must live in the noise, a good way to reduce the stress is to buy a set of the new digital antinoise audiophones, they cancel 99% of the noise this even causes high blood pressure while you're asleep even for hours after the noise takes place. Research shows if you're overweight or thin it links with the road you live on somewhat, hope you live near Lois Lane of superwoman fame and the road where you live is a line! The digital antinoise is of value to stop almost all the noise compared to most cheap headphones that try to just reverse the sound with a high speed chip. These cheap antinoise headphones aren't fast enough so they don't stop about a fourth of the sound. This is important because noise is defined in physics as changing sound, and cheap antinoise is mostly worthless except for like low frequency sound like in production plants or planes where they first started using antinoise, so if you can hear any of the sound no matter how loud, if it's changing, it's noise. The price of the digital antinoise is high (about 400$) but the price may come down rapidly in a year or two (this is 2008) for me, how about you?)

The idea that the historian is not a god or anjel is like being so much a perfectionist all worth of the good is shut out of the real world. Historians aren't gods, but who is? We don't say know to Edison because he was deaf, or Einstein because he wasn't a great math or music whiz too.

Commager's 4th conclusion about the reader already having savvy about the moral part of the history they read from the author seems like saying if the team has no boosters, the fans will be able to draw their own conclusions about the plays. While this is somewhat so, if the historian is proud of their labor brought to the reader with much diligence, why wouldn't they add a hoot like in ancient times when the civilization was in power, the word pride had a good meaning in those days. In the middle ages, the word shame became "good" with words more like humility, or patience. If belief in the labors of love was of worth in a healthier civilization, this would seem to be a good reason to believe in it in other times.

Perhaps there may be slings where you wear a liner like a sleeve that are cooled by electric heat, lots of heat pumps are!
-
A foot computer mouse may be good, more web sites in your hand!

-

A Floodproof House When You Live In A Floodplain
...
You hear a lot about these cyclone proof houses that are first on the computer and then moved to the storm to see if they are of worth or (more likely since not costing millions) concrete that has been proven to labor well in places like the Philippines, storm after storm they say. And you hear of earthquake proof houses. But what about flood proof houses? It costs millions of put up walls and sandbags are not so much fun. Actually there is already a type of flood proof house that's been in use for years, deluge after deluge, a house boat! (CLICK HERE for a bit of RV humor.) Actually, if the house could be made with large emergency pontoons and also anchored to not sail away in the flood it could be much cheaper than losing all the possessions in the Noah's arch! It might seem to be good just to make all the new houses houseboats and add lines to hold it steady in the flood, they would tug at the anchor and wouldn't be as stable. Better might be to dig pipes down into the earth that would be with the house just raised up in the flood so it wouldn't sail away but be well anchored by the pipes that would stop lateral motion even when the pontoons make the general motion higher. The force maximum could be easily calculated and known if safe before hand, the only thing that wouldn't save itself would be the family mouser or Lexus, varoom, you would return to the house later and off you both go up the superhighway to dry land, this might turn out where the people in the flood with proven houseboat science wouldn't even have to evacuate, the Lexus would go up as the ship would too, a rich blessing. The lines to the land below the house would be used as a second level safety plan to save the house if the main pontoons broke. With more experience about the flood risk of this type of architecture, it would be known how safe it was to actually ride out the storm of what type in the room. You wouldn't have to yell out for lunch, the fishing would be good this time of the month. Stilt houses were such a prevalent feature along the shores of Lake Maracaibo in S.A that Amerigo Vespucci was inspired to name the region "Venezuela" (like Venice).. Finally a realtor's promotion with a real swimming pool!

Another possibility is a sort of accordion type wall that fits in a 3 inch plate that's deep enough to hold the accordion and that goes 20 feet sideways on the wall of the house if a 20 feet continuous line exists of linear wall, if it's just 3 feet of the wall like around a sidewalk, the accordion wall that fits in the foundation of the house for a watertight fit is just 3 feet for a snug fit around the rooms here too. With any line of the wall an accordion wall container would be 3 inches and the breadth of the wall. This could be retrofit to any house in a floodplain, and it might be a real bestseller to any home or business owner after a flood without it. I used to live by a new mall, and it started to rain, the next day I paddled by a station and the mall had a lot to sail. I'm sure this was a sad day for about 30 of the businesses of the mall. The accordion would have strong reinforcing wires and could even be motorised on rails up the sides of the house. The walls would have to be made strong enough to withstand the weight of the water, but actually the strong wires of the flood wall would be a major reinforcement since most floods aren't so high, the inventor says height may be no limit because conceivably the reinforcing wires could be strong since they are geometrical. To go around like sidewalks in front of a porch, the sidewalk would have the same 3 inch breadth so the accordion type wall would fit in here and all the way around the rooms. This is the same as no leaks from your clothes machine by a water tight box around and below the machine so if it leaks the box fills and the holding company then flows to the water perhaps! They say this could be used for sofas and other most valuable possessions for flood plain dwellers, or all the cushions and treasures could be put on pontoons like the houseboat and world's most waterproof RV motif, above. This could at least save the most cherished stuff by just a watertight connection that is already under the sofa, if the flood is coming, these could be raised higher and zipped tight so watertight. These accordion boxes around the base of each sofa or TV in the room would be higher price per unit saved, but of higher worth than no protection, they might be good if automatic with floats on top as are already in the IP or for fireproofing combined. Part of the material expands on heating, and it's buoyant, so they say it's combined fire and flood protection for just a years insurance, and better than a safe because you always have access to your stuff, the room is much larger than a safe for the same value. It's thought that sofas and other stuff could be built with built in accordion walls around where the sofa reaches the floor that are beautious on the outside, especially for people who live or own businesses in floodplains.

The first of these plans for a houseboat or large retaining walls outside the house may seem expensive, but more and more houses are going to be built on floodplains and they may save all the dweller owns at a much cheaper rate than just watching the house sail away, so in the years ahead there may be more financial worth to those who hope to save their house before a flood.
-
-

High Speed Travel For The Country Without High Cost....As the roads become more conjested and the price of oil goes up they say it may be possible the American way of life in the suburbs may be reduced to more living nearer the urbs, and many people in the country would no longer live there because it's too crowded without cheaper oil. In the years ahead there may be more power by the new patented gravity powered machines (CLICK HERE.) and the machines in each dwelling or business may power each cheap 200$ vehicle via modular lightweight polymer battery packs (you'd just charge up a few packs and load them in your car at no cost for a 10,000 mile trip) and because electric motors are cheap and simple (a typical vehicle has 20,000 parts, an electric motor, about 10) this would make it so more people could live in the suburbs and the country too. Even so this leaves some problems for the car to solve. Cars have mostly replaced trains, but trains have at least three advantages, they are cheap, safe and no chauffeur is needed to go to the city up the road to the pizza shack. Drone delivery has problems as I say on my video, so I think the smaller machines on rails with wings for higher speed may be the most optimal solution. Click Here or see link below. Trains have some problems like having to drive to the station and slow speed. For the best of both, a lighter rail system made of rails supported by y shaped, or arched or upside down j pylons of the side of the roads already existing might be of worth. These cheap rails would carry modules that would just hold one occupant or a load of groceries, they would be computerized vehicles and you would pay for your food or other merchandise you would usually buy in a shopping splurge to the city and and it would be coming to you at 350 mph (talk about fast Mcdonalds) because the light rails would be cyber for high speed without actually having to drive to the city. The rails would be strong and lightweight to stop falls. The only way for the rail to fall would be if several of the pylons fell at once making it safer because all the pylons are connected by the rail. Much more rich than a chauffer driven VW! Because the rural RR train would be of low weight and much higher speed, they would be cheaper than cars or UPS. Even though the rails would reach out of cities they wouldn't replace UPS airplanes and ships. Even so they would reach out from the urban zones better, good for emergencies. There would be smaller rails like this with smaller lighter delivery modules that would be the improvement for UPS with larger rails and machines for packages like even intermodal freight containers, and offload areas to send to the smaller branch lines and machines.

 I had originally just envisioned this a cheap fast way to deliver groceries, and this may be the most important use. Even so it would also be of worth for many other types of business. While using the warehouse beside the store to actually box cabbage and each box of food is good for in town (CLICK HERE) this would be good for extending this idea of automated food transport of food and people to the country or urban areas (and even more!). Each main road in the country would have the rails above the road with the pylons more stable either by smart materials that would automatically adjust the more lightweight pylons by the pressure of the ongoing train or by weights to the outside of the pylons so the inward pressure of the train would be balanced by the outward weight of the stabilizing weights, and to reach the rails themselves the cheap car (powered by the gravity powered machines) itself would be used as I say above to just go to the nearby train station of the village with my life of Irish, in 20 other countrys! If possible, and cheap these trains could reach many rural roads. This is a sort of extension of the old pneumatic tubes in buildings in the city, which I envisioned in a more elaborate plan of light rails throughout the city for high speed urban parcels by cyber power. This could also be used for the main roads to the country. To make it viable economically a fee would be charged and since it wouldn't reach the most distant country first the light rail systems would start from the city and expand outward to the country as it paid for itself instead of just building out to untraveled roads first. No doubt you'd often want to use this to replace the commute, so each vehicle  would be just one unit with stuff they buy at the store. More substantial rails would be higher in price. Families could rent or buy their own vehicle cheaper than a car but much higher speed. To travel with other people all the vehicles would be linked in one unit in route. While mommy couldn't go spank the baby (good for mommy) perhaps the family in the train would be connected by audio or whatever. Most people would rent a vehicle at the city, so no parking problem. This probably wouldn't replace vehicles, but it would be especially useful for people who live far from the city. It would be faster safer cheaper and easier than cars, and faster than trains. And it would reduce the congestion while not only to reberb the suburbs, it would also make living out in the country cheaper not more expensive and thus it would be of real worth to reduce population densities. Evolution, Overpopulation, and It's Historic Influence. (Why overpopulation may be a real concern, using up resources. ).

Here's the Link To my Video Anjelfire and Drones, Problems and Possible Solutions
-
-

The Northwest Passage and the Panama Canal
..
With the advent of global warming, the possibility of opening up a NW Passage for shipping may become more than just history. Far from being thrilled by the discovery of the New World in 1492, European mariners considered it a stop across the road to Asia around South America. They would always say the US and Latin America and Canada are what makes the old world go round!

If the N may warm up anyway we may be able to speed up the process if it's of value. (Global warming may be actually caused by the sun burning hotter, the solar cycles are at their most heat in all the known science, and when the solar heat increases so does the heat on mars and worlds like Neptune, so solar warming may be safe because the sun hasn't overheated in the history of life more about this.. For a link about the atmospheric changes of the earth, Click here..) Using combinations (or a combination of just the cosmos!) of mirrors, inflatable lenses, refracting shades, or magnetic bubbles, heat and light would be focused in a narrow 100 mile wide band ice free, this may be a way to have the NW Passage ahead of global warming, of great import for the world economy. The fourth option above, magnetic bubbles, is based on the new science that uses a machine like a magnet to make a cheap magnetic field or bubble, this is being researched to use as a giant solar sail. When the bubble is farther from the sun, it expands and this makes it go at the same speed, so it takes no extra sails at greater distances from the sun, the perfect machine to move a space satellite in and about the solar system. Because the solar sail is a round loop, it may be used if modulated in the right shape more a lense to focus the heat along the path of the NW passage. And part of the heat the field collects can be used (not sued if mom's a good lawyer!) to power the bubble generator machine also. If this plan works out well, it might in the offing be scaled up to heat Russia, Canada, and Alaska, (Canadians are cozy about global warming!)

While some would say this is bad for wildlife, the environment may be safe mostly. Biologists say life is adapting rapidly to the changes in the weather. After all there were perhaps 20 ice ages in recent time (2 million years) and we have a bit of an ice age, named Christmas. Times of warm weather aren't uncommon to life, for millions of years after the dinosaurs, there was warm weather for mammals, warmer than the ice ages and during the interglacial ages hippopotamuses were as far north as N Europe.

The Panama Canal

If the NW Passage plan is inevitable, or just for more options, the Panama canal might be improved for supertankers by a large oil pipe or pipes over the hills of the canal and using the siphon of the oil from one ship to the other. Larger ships can't go through the canal, and in the 30 years from about 1978 it's been cheaper overall to send the oil and other such goods around SA than via the canal. It would be more optimal yet if they had the pipeline because it would be faster. The ships would have to be in sets one each east and west, and without loading something in the ship they would be like me in the bus and take 5/4 of a visit, or sitting at the bus start, it's an action adventure reality show, I never miss the bus, I go by office box!) The big business could afford to have sets of ships in both shores, and this would be where there would be the most to win via the pipeline. Another possibility is to dig a tunnel the width of the inter-modal freight containers slightly above sea level. The ships with all the containers (not oil) would unload fast by machine and the containers would move by motors and a cushion of air around the containers so there would be no collisions. High speed machines on both sides could unload and load the containers. (They say about 30,000 of these are accidentally dropped into the ocean each year, often with ill results, in other science this might be solved by making each container a sort of miniature boat with it's own flotation device and propulsion to make it to the shore, or at least a gps the owners could use to find these valuable containers and retrieve them, or they might be wave powered to reach the owner just 1/3 more slowly but of worth to return. The first boats other than a few to make it through the NW Passage were actually bathtub soaps, they were dropped out of an intermodal container and they went year by year as the ice froze and thawed all the way from the N around Alaska and Greenland and then south to the East coast of the US in a few years.)

A third possibility to make passage of the Panama canal for big ships is to actually make the boats modular. The ship would arrive at the canal and divide into 10 ships and these would go through the canal one by one and then reunite on the other side. This way much larger ships could go through the canal!


A History of The NW Passage


Working for the English Henry Hudson in 1610 sailed the ship Discovery into Hudson Bay where her was frozen in for the winter. Provisions ran out and his men mutinied and cast him, his young son and seven loyal sailors adrift in a small boat. They were never seen again. Or in other words he's a sort of famous Santa Clause in a cosmic rowing machine to the stars!


In 1771 Samuel Hearne of the Hudson Bay Company left Fort Prince of Wales and marched north across the grim Canadian Barrens to the north of the Coppermine River at the northern edge of the North American continent. He proved that no northwest passage cut across the North American continent.
They looked out over the land and they knew it was him when he returned in giant fuzzy slippers!


The sea Capt. James Cook in 1771 rounded the northern shore of Alaska's W coast and reported that no passage existed on the Pacific shore S of 70 degrees, (not the heatwave!) and that the N above this is ice choked and inevitable for commerce. How can't we you feel our way around the world?

In 1845 John Franklin sailed with 130 officers and men. The ships carried china, crystal, silver, a library and an old music machine, but no Arctic wear and little understanding of Arctic survival. By 1847 a worried Royal Navy began to dispatch rescue expeditions. In the next nine years, 40 expeditions crisscrossed the Arctic looking for Franklin. Though they never found the lost party, relief expeditions mapped vast stretches of the Canadian Arctic. They found the information, and neither the information or Franklin was buried in a memorial service!

In the late 1980's a Smithsonian funded search found Franklin's body and the boats, right where his wife had always said they would find him, SOUTH IN THE HEAT!

A US based atomic submarine made the first underwater transit of the NW Passage in 1960, Why? Like Columbus, to make it to the other zhenzhou!

The New Super Clean Machines ...

The new bacteria in hospitals and doctors' offices are resistant to antibiotics. A hundred thousand people a year die of these what I would call "actually not so super" bugs. Getting medical care is more hazardous than going on an airplane. Elevators are safer yet, I see this sign with a sideways arrow that says ELEVATOR, maybe it's a sideways elevator! Perhaps hospital rooms of the future will be auto clean, and so will be machines in them. There are more ways to clean than just soap. The trick is to make a room clean with a strong enough or smart enough cleaner to stop the bacillus without harm to the patients. Soon there may be computerized cleansers rather like giant scrubbing bubbles in most hospital rooms. There are now small toy vehicles that use a built in fan to add air pressure enough you can actually drive the RC machine up the wall and even on the roof, so dry cleaning machines of this type may reach all the room, floor walls and roof if of worth. A good way to clean that stops almost all life of any kind is to take away food, water, and cool the air. I used to use chemicals to stop bees in my house but this is more effective, cleaner, costs nothing, and is safer than calling the exterminator. Each scrubbing machine could have scanners that would bounce lasers off the floors or other surfaces to be cleaned. As these are envisioned they would sense and remove any food, water, or microbes of the type between the beam and the sensor, to clean and search for the bacillises at the same time. A major problem with cleansing hospital rooms is that many of the germs and viruses are inside the patient or doctor and nurse. Using lasers inside the body may also clean here too in a sort of laser light show where the light lights by combination with other lasers up only after travel inside the body, using no incision with higher efficiency. YYYYYClick Here YYYYYFor More>>>> Laser Surgery Via Antibiodies To Find and Remove Harmful Cells. Other ways to clean rooms by machine are being researched such as to use an always up laminar draft of air from the floor. This flow of the air would carry the microbes only upward and away from the persons and once above the head of poeple in the room, the lasers and actuation machines above would then zap all the germs there without risk of laser harm to the people in the rooms. The rooms may be simple so all the surfaces are minimal and smooth, with molecule wide or broader rollers that make the outside of the plate or floor tile that when flipped to the other side are zapped by lasers inside the shelf or below the floor and then revolved to another cycle of cleansing. Exobiologists say that the compounds of life they see in astronomy and thus probably life itself can't exist without a surface. In hospital rooms in addition to all the cleaning all the beds may have electric blankets so while the patients are cozy and have the right temperature always, the microbes in the room around them with neither food or water from the scrubbing robots would also be reduced by the room temperature overnight. Obviously if to seal off all food and water and turn down the air conditioner may even stop a type of life like bees that have been on earth for 100s of millions of years and resistant, it may be of worth for other types of clean. Since they would want to stay in the cozy hospital bed in the cool room, patients might even have power beds with controls so they could drive up the health food snack machine (I'm serious! All they have in the ER in my town is fat and chips) or go for a nurse visit just for a suprise and a fun visit she may like! Don't call us we'll yell for you!

The hospital of 2079 (my mom the prof's hatband size!) may have Blood pressure cuffs to auto cleanse, this has already been done with many types of machines. Schicks are self sharpening, self assembled machines that make unlimited copies of the machines, the machines, the machines...! and so on, such as the bathroom tiles that use light and embedded compounds to always make them safe about microbes, and other recent inventions I've seen include a sleeping bag that's cleansing by using body heat and compounds to refresh the cloth of the bed while you sleep. So like many smart machines like arches of roofs or bridges that automatically strengthen in an earthquake, self cleaning machines in offices and hospitals may become common. No doubt since people who live in unsheltered conditions have stronger immune systems because they are strong with more exercise to immunity than our immune systems receive, the best bet may be to kill the super bacillus but also also to take more active steps (Pasteur said in his last breath, the amoeba is out, the world is in). The best way in general may be to build up and flex and program our body's natural immune activities, with small small treadmill aerobic machines of like size of the amobea no doubt.. So to stop the super bugs for these times while programming our body for the worst of them, and reducing them too to like the outdoors where they can't evolve so much, may be a good defence for us, they can't win the war without knowing about the terrain.

And no doubt another good way to defend against viruses and other bugs may be to engineer "good" germs and "good" viruses that are harmless to us to defend and clean the rooms for us, sort of like a small but powerful bodyguard for us when in the realm of the most danger. Good germs could be engineered to defend against many illnesses, one for sinusitus, one for good oral care, one for the ears, and so on, sort of a modular immune system you could add in and remove once cured. With illnesses like sinusitis or prostatitis good GE germs may be of special worth because they can climb into realms otherwise unreachable without surgery (these are where the immune system can't reach) and would cleanse so well it may cure many types of illness. To remove the good germs once cured, other good germs that would automatically metabolize out the cleansing germs and carry in more of evolution's own replacement cells might be used. This would be a bit unsafe no doubt with risk of mutation though small, but it might be far cheaper and more of worth than surgery. With the current state of health science as it is Sinusitis can cause severe incurabale pain, so the advantages of this method for many types of septic illness may outweigh the risks.

Machines that clean out allergens or other special machines like for clean rooms may soon be on the market, a related computerized laser cleaning motif.
-