Centrifugal Force Use In High Speed Travel...

A General Physical Definition of Expansion and Attraction

They now have a way of reaching Mars in just two months using spacecraft momentum. This is where they would send autonomous self propelled masses up to the space vehicle, the vehicle then boots these back to the earth, multiplying the speed between ship and land much by the force of the weight thrown between them. This goes with my view of the cosmos where all expansion is more by motion of particles between expansive disconnected points, and attraction is by continuous waves. Expansion is like a heavy weight being thrown between two masses of expansion; the recoil from the first solid mass makes the thrower move away from the receiver, and the receiver also moves away from the thrower when they catch the mass. So expansion operates by distinction of the masses. Attraction would operate by a continuous connection like a rope between the two points of contraction. To make more attraction with a rope between the implosion the rope is waved at higher speed and the waves would be like a more contracted spring. Special Relativity is with the constant speed of light and would make more expansion. While Einstein believed light was particulate, both waves and particles are well proven. Even if Relativity is about disconnected points such as about a distant star because the speed of light is slow we can't definitely know what's before or after what goes on here, with the unconnected times of Einstein, the waves would still have to connect them or gravity wouldn't attract. The gravity that connects all the cosmos would be a wave by my idea about how expansion and contraction operate, and if like the rope, it changes speed to implode, this is more evidence of my idea that gravity is non relativistic. Gravity is an acceleration like a wave, non relativistic with a changing wave speed between points of implosion, this is the opposite of Einstein's theory of gravity (special relativity is more well proven than general relativity of gravity) where in Special Relativity the light has constant speed. The mass of the Earth is more valid than the mass of the moon because the Earth is more at rest relative to it. I think this is one reason why lots of people said Einstein's theory was uncommon sense, it wasn't the other main truth in physics. It has the many of expansion like the thermodynamic constant speed of light, but not the one in union of the waves of the changing speed of gravity. And the idea above of multiplying the force between the spaceship and the earth via autonomous heavy weights fits well with the exchange momentum explanation how expansion operates, and explains why it may be an efficient way to move a ship at high speeds, more than just usual rocket propulsion.
.
.A consideration about a slice of wheel for propulsion is about the motion at the start and finish of the travel of the oscillation of the slice of wheel, this is lateral travel of the motive power and would waste energy. All momentum is conveyed by changes of mass in fields, so just as with the friction of the earth and tides, changes in the friction of motion (heat) like tides makes changes in the motion of the earth and moon, and the opposite too. For example, the earth and moon just have the two fields of electromagnetism and gravity. No other fields are present between the earth and moon. So the mass moments of the slice of wheel at the finish of each oscillation [so it wouldn't have to be a complete wheel and would have a definite direction of motion, harnessing the power of the wheel] would have changes in heat. To make the propulsion so the sidewise motion is not fizzed away to heat the merely somewhat amazin starry cosmos, the heat would be collected with heat collection plates and reused to save more power in the machine, while retaining the advantages of foreword propulsion via centrifugal force.
.
The spaceship momentum motif uses heavy masses between the star ship and the base station, The machines that use centrifugal force for propulsion are self contained however, so it would be of worth both for mars travel and for travel of much more distance than via even than the web.com, no high speed weights would risk impact with the ship (a space ship is fragile) and no risk of not catching the weights, so the speed to reach mars would be maintained. And the other motif of sending weights between earth and ship would lose speed with motion through the field of earth or other stronger fields. So generally centrifugal force would be good to reach Mars fast while saving fuel. The same general theory of expansion of the field as the mass thrown between two points is of the usual centrifugal force and Special Relativity, but safer, cheaper, and more like Star Search but with a fuzzy remote control of radiance I typed in the usual hour with in a month!
.