RELATIVITY AND THE QUANTUM ERASER

 Here I want to discuss the quantum eraser experiment as it relates to the speed of light..

  Einstein was much concerned about the speed of the collapse of the wave function and other so called superluminal effects in quantum mechanics.

 Wheeler had proposed the quantum eraser experiment and it was performed in 1999 to investigate the claims made by Bell that with the double slit experiment if the wave or particle goes through the slit as a particle and is measured as a particle or a wave on the other side the two waves going through the slit can be changed to particles instantaneously by measuring what would have been the waves as particles on the other side. What Bell might have presumed was by way of  superluminal influence, like a wave between the area where the measurement is made and the dividing area.

 The experiment seems to show by some interpretations that the superluminal influence exists.

 The standard interpretation of the experiment now is that between the point where the wave goes through the slit and the actual measurement, the events connecting them is potentially either a wave or particle and is essentially not one or the other until it's measured.

 I have held that these superluminal wave events are real like Bell might have, one objection to this as Einstein also might have said is that you can have a wave and a particle but you can't have both of the same time.



  The idea of it being both a wave and a particle at the same time in order to get around the evidence that there might be a connection seems to me like a cheaper version of the same superluminal event.

 By being both a wave and a particle at the same time I tend to hold that they are connected over the distance between the observation of the sensor and the changing area of the machine with both slits. And the connection is still faster than light.

Indeed if both a wave and particle at the same time, this might be explained by a superluminal field inside the quanta so that it seems like there is no causality there and this itself could be explained not with the lack of causality, but rather the superluminal field that makes it look so blurred as if it were both a wave and particle at the same time as measured by the much slower and more sluggish heavy quanta that relativity would involve, while at smaller radii and superluminal speed causality would be restored because the waves and particles of the subatomic subatomic realm would themselves be with more definite on or off events. At any given point the wave for high speed would have a certain definite even if small amount of cohesive force. As I say elsewhere I think it may have a lot of the waves at super high speed even if at low energy, and the high speed overpowers the low energy so the result is something like the large snapback for light that Maxwell imagined based on the resilience to the medium. And yet the medium is not super dense because the waves are low energy and the waves connecting between the electron and the positron and the light are also entangled only between those quanta and so the high density of the medium is not common even with the large snapback of the light and the resilience of the medium.

 Some have noted that if the quantum eraser experiment  was done on interstellar scale, the wave when measured could change an event at a slit that was billions of years away in the past with a giant version of this experiment.

 Einstein never defined information or a signal well but here I attempt to define it by saying that information in its most basic sense is a connection of a signal as in the connecting boson between fermions in fundamental physics.

So that energy be conserved all interactions known have a change in one place connected by exchange of energy to another place with the change in other event.

 This, my definition of information seems to be a fundamental method because it's based profoundly on energy conservation which is "even more well-proven than relativity somewhat"!

 So much of special relativity as in "all" was about the fundamental observation that the speed of light is constant and the rest fits this experiment.

 If there were any other way for the signal to go from distant sources and observers the speed of light would not be so fundamental.

 I believe a simple phase change of superluminal fields of dark matter and energy may allow another degree of freedom and this for example is about the extra tensor of general relativity for gravity that relativity doesn't explain.

When we use this  simple change, Bell's idea is easy to explain.

One problem the physicists are concerned about here is how if we allow there to be information between the measured wave and the source it seems to have the problem about the present influencing the past.

 If you have a boat in the ocean and the. waves have a certain speed we might imagine sending a message through those waves and we say that there is a moment in the present when the wave is emitted and then a moment later when the wave reaches the ship.

 Here there's a definite present past and future.

If we assume the waves of the ocean are the highest speed that we can go then if we had light that we could send to the ship by saving MCI most! and hope to make some kind of change based on the information it sends like controlling where the ship goes by influencing the event on the ship at the speed of light or another high speed, then we can't say as readily that the source of the wave onshore is definitely in the past once the wave reaches the ship.

 By how the light influences the events on the ship we can say that it's more definitely in a common present time both of the shore and the ship.

 This could be much like information sent at the speed of light around the world.

By a much higher speed of the communication of the information, what would have been the present and the past become more unified in a real event.

If you remember the history of time zones originally all the train towns had their own time. When the trains unified communications all the times of the railroads in a real sense were more unified.

 In truth an influential part of the past and future of time is just the speed of communications between points in space. If the speed is much faster, the past and future essentially become more unified with the present.

 The whole idea that we're looking into the past when we see light from stars light years away is fundamentally based on relativity.

 I believe there's no reason to assume this is fundamental just as the waves of the sea don't prove that there was never any evidence that light was much faster. Just to say because physics hasn't reached another level doesn't mean it never will.

 The quantum eraser would seem to not be so paradoxical if we say not that the wave can be both a wave and a particle the same time or that "there ain't no future in the past"!

 The light that reaches the ship from the shore itself has a definite past present and future.

Even so the light has an extra degree of freedom the waves of the sea don't have.

 By this interpretation the atoms around us that can only move up to the speed of light because they are quanta like the slow ocean waves while the wave Bell imagined is like the light but much faster.

 So what would have been the present past and future for the ocean waves is not defining the future and the past of the lightwaves.

 We can imagine observing the ocean wave where it starts on its way to the ship and then sending out the lightwave to the ship with instructions for the ship to change direction before the wave of the ocean reaches it.

Or we could imagine once the pilot on the ship sees the wave being sent in the water, he sends out a signal to the wave machine on the shore and tells it to change its signal.

This could be done almost in real time compared to the wave of the sea. Neither the light wave nor the ocean wave signal are moving backward in time.



 The information in the light isn't influencing the ocean wave in the past, they're both unified in a common event instead.

 A definite past present and future is something that I believe relativity lacks a lot. Because if the slow speed of light is all that connects things up there's no way to tell what's before or after here compared to Alpha Centauri the nearest star.

 If all around us there is the measure of a definite past present and future of room temperature and room size physics  it would seem the cosmos would be able to make use of our advantage also!

 Relativity has it where space and time are supposedly unified. Yet by the slow speed of light we can't know what's before or after at Alpha Centauri, and for this measure space is also separated because if the events are separate in time they're also like particles of a gas and not connected so the space and the mass energy aren't connected either and there are no forces of attraction..

 Thus in a real sense space and time aren't so connected by relativity. And special relativity to the degree that it holds only controls the speed of the playback of the distant movie seen by the observer of the starship at a distance like a movie speed changed but it doesn't control the events themselves.

And if space and time were completely unified we would expect if you move backwards in space you would move backwards in time.

But if we use the extra degree of freedom of dark matter and dark energy this solves the problem because all the universe would exist much more as it is "now" even though each observer at still separate points in space is also moving through time more in parallel with a definite past present and future for the entire cosmos.

 If mass and energy are about information as many have held, it seems improbable it can only compute where we are and for the rest of the cosmos no such fortune.

In essence this my idea would seem to be an attempt to add more to physics where obviously otherwise we have no claim for why time is here where we are but it's so much changed for the rest of the cosmos.

All that's needed here is a faster connection than "the wave of the sea". The change in the the ship of the change in the information from the wave of light isn't changing the wave of the ocean moving towards the ship backwards in time. Both the wave and the light information are moving forward in time.

While fast signals like  for global communication essentially make a lot of the things that go on in one more common present the present itself is only moving from the past to the future, and it doesn't itself either make slower waves have influence in the past. So to me this objection to Bell's idea isn't a fundamental disproof of the quantum eraser.

 Indeed by using a cheap explanation as rich as it would be seems to say why the experiment seems to show superluminal events are real because assuming waves and particles to exist at the same place and time, is also superluminal.

 For example, not only the speed of the collapse of the wave function but also events like the spins of an electron being at once more than unified would seem not to fit well with the speed of light because we have the waves at different phases that are much smaller and faster and this is easier to explain with higher speed low energy waves, the matter waves of QED.

 The electron spin is already used up on electromagnetism, if it's the speed of light it can't change much.

  But lower energy waves that can move much faster and with higher speed adaptations might do many more things, like perhaps communications and computer science.

Imagine doing the giant experiment of the type above.

Here instead of the super slow connection of the light, we have a superluminal connection between the measuring machine and the source of the light wave on the outside of tbe quanta like the light wave with the ship moving through the air.

 Essentially both are now in the "present"; because you don't need the super slow connection of light (compared to this super luminal event) and the cosmos is more unified as by gravity.

 Einstein tells us that light is a particle uninfluenced from emission to absorption and so the speed of light as constant, yet in every other word he speaks of the doppler shift in Special Relativity which is a wave event. And Einstein also discovered the wave particle duality so shame on him disproving himself..

 I say it's either the wave particle duality with waves predominant, or SR (without waves) and since waves are more fundamental since as Einstein said it's impossible to measure a fundamental particle which can both emit and absorb a wave, I hold that waves are fundamental to gravity because it's an inward radiance and particles have sides and would radiate out like a gas.

Entropy would be about the failure of special relativity, and so essentially by unifying all the fields more by attraction like this by something like superluminal events, this would once more restore energy conservation so the universe isn't radiating out energy that's removing from the universe and so energy or mass is otherwise being destroyed.

 Special Relavivity seems to fit energy conservation at short range yet it fails at greater distance for energy conservation and so it contradicts itself also about the problem of space time unification here with the "slow" speed of light.

 If we plot the timeline vertically between the ship with the ocean waves and the light waves of the telephone call light conversation, with space the x-axis

the wave moving at slow speed will move more diagonal like the water waves while the information in the light waves will make the angle much more horizontal on the graph.

 So while we can't influence the events in the past like in the quantum eraser billion years of years ago we can actually change them more where they are now and what is called by relativity a billion light years ago.

So I would hold what's being changed by the quantum eraser experiment is actually the more direct union of the two points being measured between the sensor and the slits of the experiment.

It's not yet known how far the quantum eraser experiment might reach.

 I would hold that it would never reach billions of years into the past while even so assuming just as Einstein was as the speed of light is the top speed we could also assume by another phase change and Maxwell's method which might be more general that we have another speed for the matter waves of QED.

 At any rate the idea that we could influence events in the past or the distant past I don't hold to be true and neither would this be evidence for the locality of the quantum eraser experiment because we can still assume that we can influence both events in the present at more distance in the cosmos   just as we can influence events on the boat at the faster than the speed of waves of the sea.

 I would hold that this is not just an addition to special relativity but it's fundamental to the connection of gravity and other forces by  energy conservation.

 The quantum eraser experiment isn't influencing events in the past just in a more unified present and this can be easily proven by simply making a change in one place by way of entanglement and see if it correlates with the other change we can measure.

 By Maxwell's method and my hopeful adaptation of it which I call GWD general wave Dynamics this is easy to explain by the resilience of the field which gives you your speed of the connection and by Einstein's method there is no explanation.

I can see why Einstein was concerned about the speed of the collapse of the wave function and I believe as I say that speed of the folding of proteins is evidence that evolution would want to make good use of Einstein's concern! The life that uses superluminal collapse of the proteins can compute faster than other life and it survives more often..

 My idea is to add the present to our physics.

With the connection between Los Angeles and Tokyo by way of the light certainly you can't take an ocean wave departing from Tokyo and wait till it reaches Los Angeles then try to influence it back in the Old Country. But if we imagine that wave departing from Japan and someone in LA calls up to the people in Japan and says "hey change that wave!" and sure enough in science they do! Because of the more definite present by the much faster speed of the light conversation connection a more universal present is added.

What you can't do is go back to the wave as it reaches LA and influence it in its past. In a way you can influence its past because if you called as the wave was leaving the harbor at much higher speed you're influencing how the wave somewhere in its past will change in the future.

 What this means for the interference experiment is that if you have someone there where the interference is being created and they have a way to send a faster than light signal back to the source where the light is going through the two gaps at the time when it leaves the two channels and this changes the light, then in this sense, at faster than light the wave is being influenced in its past, or it will be when its future is realized at the interference zone.

.

 What can't be achieved here is to go with the light inside of an ocean wave or quanta and influence the light in the past at just the speed of light at the source of the experiment from the area of the interference pattern.

 The ocean wave can't influence the wave back in Tokyo from LA this is not probable. But if we have a wave outside or inside the quantum as in the interference experiment if it's on the outside of the quanta like the light where you call from LA to Japan for some "light conversation" if there's an extra degree of freedom the call can influence the wave before it reaches the other side.

  A simple phase change may be all we need for a signal like this because above all else in relativity the foundation of all of it's based on the idea there's no other way for the signal to reach and influence a distant event than by way of the light. The matter waves are on the outside and inside of the quanta of the light waves and may not interact with the light much because of what I call line removal, where gravity or the matter wave of the experiment acts like paramagnetism and just wraps around the outside of the heavy quanta even while they are always a source of gravity. This is why gravity and centrifugal force don't shield metal plates and also why dark matter and dark energy have been so difficult to find even while when you jog around the room and change directions it's easy to see by how you feel!

  As a say on my page about physics generally the waves of the low energy field may be between the lines of the classical electromagnetic field lines. This will keep the lines from bunching up or kinking while at the same time keeping them flowing to reduce their interaction with the heavy quanta or the field lines.

 And this would also explain centrifugal and centrifugal force as well as keeping the waves between the lines from being quantised. Einstein thought light was in special relativity only  having sides, uninfluenced from the emission to the sensor but the light would radiate out and lose energy and nothing could connect up like gravity with more distance and this would disprove energy conservation. So gravity and the matter waves of QED I believe may be faster than light because they're lighter than light and so move faster as by Maxwell's method of calculation of the exact speed of light exactly based on the resilience of the medium (which may be dark matter and dark energy) and not interacting much really with the heavy quanta so we don't get large relativistic effects even though the field is faster than light. So as with the quantum computer there is some interaction between the quantum well and these faster than light waves with the collapse of the wave function.

  Einstein didn't believe faster than light motion was impossible, he believed it was possible as long as whatever it was moving faster than light always was.

So in this idea the speed of light is more like a curtain than a barrier.

This is how I think the collapse of the wave function works.

The wave function is ready to collapse, and they send in the microwaves and they interact with the outside of the heavy quanta causing the collapse of the wave function at faster than light.

Note here that because the speed of light barrier is like a sheet the collapsing waves can bump on one side and really influence what's on the other side even though both are not interacting as much as quanta. If there was no interaction the collapse couldn't be programmed and quantum computers couldn't work.

As I say I believe that the waves between the electromagnetic field lines for centrifugal force and gravity are also outside or inside the area of the wave function of quanta essentially. And this is what I was hinting at about the idea of the quantum eraser.

  

.If these waves made of dark matter and dark energy are indeed external to the quanta and faster than light this could connect up the cosmos in a more universal present and so while we can't influence the past of the wave like the ocean wave of the two photon wave experiment, we might have the value of influence at the start of the wave from the harbor.

 One problem about dark energy is calculations have been done based on quantum mechanics and while cosmologists say the dark energy only needs to be like 2/3 more to explain the accelerated expansion of the universe the predicted value based on quantum mechanics is 10 to the 120th. The huge change of value could be explained by the phase change of the dark matter in energy between the  electromagnetic field lines. 

 By Maxwell's method the resilience of the medium determines the speed of the waves light for light which predicts it exactly. But if there is the phase change in the areas between the electromagnetic field lines and there it becomes super fluid suddenly in this scenario the resistance goes way down as the speed goes way up.

 As the resistance goes down the force also gets much much less strong. So the quantum mechanical electromagnetic field lines could be flexing the dark energy and dark matter waves between them and interacting with them also and we could say they've lost a lot of grip of the quanta. The quanta might grab on and squeeze the field like Maxwell thought about electric charges to cause the speed of light. Even so as I say as with the collapse of the wave function the heavy quanta are indeed interacting a bit with the dark matter and dark energy waves as they may need, to cause centrifugal and gravitational force.

This idea that the waves are low energy but much higher speed to give the equivalent of the particles may explain about Einstein's objections Schrodinger's cat. How can the field or a quanta field both be a wave and particle at the same time? How real are the low energy particles of the Feynman diagrams? The assumption that they aren't there at all I think is viable if we instead assume that there is the equivalent wave value of these particles. The waves are much much faster than light and so any possible configuration these waves would imply is more possible. This is why the Feynman diagrams are only weighted values.

They seem to be both a wave and a particle at the same time as by quantum mechanics but only when we measure the quanta with the wave function collapse do they become more definite. Thus the electron and positive charge are connected to the light by the lower energy but much higher speed waves, and as with the Feynman diagrams we can assume only in a potential way the events are there or that Schrodinger's cat is both dead and alive.  The light has the huge snapback of the waves to give it it's speed but only when the waves reach the light does the collapse of the wave function propelling the light take place. The problem of whether it's a wave or particle would be solved by simply assuming that it's a wave with the phase changed to give it the general quanta equivalence but only if we assume the wave is faster than light. 

WHY IS THE EPR CONSTANT WITH DISTANCE?

As I say I think of the waves as going between the classical electromagnetic field lines. The field lines as with LIGO are themselves quantum and so move at the speed of light but the waves between them aren't. 

 

 But if the waves speed up or slow down with radiation out from the electron and then into the light and the waves are indeed not radiating out like quanta as with usual radiant energy then the force of the EPR would remain constant with distance as has been found. So because the EPR waves are able to change speed as they zigzag back and forth between the expanding or contracting electromagnetic field lines just as much as the lines radiate out or back in, and according to changes in their speed, the force of the EPR remains constant. The waves would speed up or slow down much like the acceleration of gravity by these events since gravity is an acceleration and if the waves change without incoherance because they change both speed and frequency unlike light in Special relativity, being the opposite with changes in wavelength alone, they follow the classical electromagnetic field lines which first radiate out then back in just as much and so the EPR stays constant with distance. It's possible gravity has radiance unlike the EPR because it actually radiates on the outside of the lines, or perhaps due to this and being much lower energy than the EPR.

About The Objections to Faster than Light motion of Special Relativity.

Some say that time would reverse if you're going faster than light.

 But if you have an airplane that breaks the sonic barrier the sound waves that return to us aren't reversed in time neither is the image of the jet.

  I think this is why Einstein believed that travel faster than light might be possible provided it was always faster than light. By reducing most of the interaction with the relativistic events as in the collapse of the wave function by Line Removal mostly the problem of these events being influential is reduced. (This could also solve the hierarchy problem why gravity is so much less strong than the other forces. Once Line Removal takes place as the fields are created in the singularity of a black hole by  reacting back with reradiant force and outward through the black hole jets at faster than light, energy is conserved by the reaction to the gravitational attraction and with this comes line removal so the gravity can't influence the inside of the heavy quanta.. So gravity remains weak by Line Removal. And it can't have quantum numbers or shielding.)

 If you look at a weight falling in an airplane and moving with the frame of reference to the airplane the weight falls straight down. One of the classic arguments for relativity has been that the frame of reference of the observer on the ground is just as valid as to say the weight is moving forward in an arc with the airplane as it is for the observer on the airplane to say the weight is falling radially towards the Earth.

 Basically if gravity is much faster then light by its waves (as I say on my main physics pages the waves that LIGO has found may actually be inertial and they're only at the speed of light by relativity where inertia is important. Gravity itself radiates in and the LIGO waves radiate out and so gravity and inertia aren't the same, see my link below for what I consider to be my best most complete physics page) it changes little between the airplane's observer and the land-based observer. This might be because it's usually faster than light like the x and y coordinates of a ballistic arc where they are completely independent of each other.  

   There is no displacement seen for gravity while my idea predicts a slight bit and this would be about the much huger speed of gravity at 10 to the 37 times the speed of light if Maxwell's method works here. This is much like the value Van Flandern calculated, and also more like Newton's belief.

 Einstein tried to get around the gravity displacement problem by invoking what he called a velocity dependent effect. This is supposedly a large wave the Earth surfs on that just exactly counteracts with what otherwise would have been a displacement to fit relativity! But I note if this large wave was strong enough to influence gravity and gravity is at the speed of light, light will change in many different angles as you look through the wave! If it's a high speed event it would change every chemical or electrical event by the sideways influence by gravity if it was strong enough to actually bend the light.

 Einstein might have magically saved relativity but there's not a single Wikipedia article about the velocity dependent effect and there's no evidence for it and no reason why it would be there other than to save relativity!

 So the radial acceleration hasn't changed much for the ballistic arc while the sideways motion of inertia has changed a lot.

 I think of this type of argument for the relative sideways motion as above of a mass falling in an airplane as saying that inertia equals no inertia, where the rest frame fits the frameof motion.. hardly what I would call an equivalence of the observers.

If we separate the two components of gravity and inertia only gravity remains unchanged so the point of view of the Earth observer tends to be more valid.

 This may be because gravity and inertia are not equivalent in my formulation and so you don't have things like huge gravity around a million g centrifuge and you weigh a different amount in the north on the Earth than you would at the tropics. 

They're not completely equal as Einstein thought by his hope to use Maxwell's unification of electricity and magnetism essentially by way of quantum assumptions, instead they're on the more continuous scale like F=ma instead of E equals MC². 

.This would be because gravity is more fundamentally a wave moving between the quantum field lines and this is why when you plug in the equations for gravity into quantum mechanics there are infinities not because gravity is infinite but because it interacts little with the heavy quanta, being dark matter.

One thing the idea of gravity being faster than light might resolve may be about why larger galaxies are being seen in the early cosmos then should have had time to form. This and larger structures like the Great Wall might be explained by faster than light gravity to bind heavy masses well in other ways  than gravity at the speed of light.

.

I can think of 40 things that GWD explains that relativity can't, for example there's been found to be no limit yet on the speed of the EPR.

Here's one of my more popular posts about my ideas..how superluminal waves and dark matter and energy may fit special relativity well yet with the extra degree of motion that they might allow for solutions like this about the problem of causality for events without a distant connection of this type and with a link to my physics synopsis about my idea I name General Wave Dynamics GWD

Click Here for my page, Thanks for reading.

Here's a second post and more about my ideas...

https://paintbrushsage.blogspot.com/2019/12/pi-radiation-and-more.html?m=1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What Must People Who Turn Down Covid Care Be Thinking? ..

I think they're dying in a certain sense so others might live.. because there is "no bad doesn't bring good in evolution". or at any rate there is a  strong general trend towards balance and moderation.

 

As with covid-19 itself many experts say the main cause was overcrowding. People had moved into foreign territory like in the areas with the bats that caused covid 19. So too in evolution the horses shoulder just reached to the ground to get the grass not too little or too much. Evolution would have caused our numbers and almost all our life to be like this also and above a certain level a lot of people would have gotten ill and this would have reduced the overpopulation down to more healthy levels by going back and forth between the higher and lower levels in evolution.

Some scientists say that cancer itself evolved in evolution as a way to control levels of overcrowding. The bacteria in the pond would increase and they would start to get ill and this would make it so the overcrowding  wasn't too extreme. Land is the fundamental foundation of life and history shows that when people lose their land they are no more part of history.

So it's not surprising when people start changing the fundamental levels of life and death with technology of health and unkindness to evolution they should start to show signs of illness.  They used to believe that animals like insects and fish with overcrowding don't become ill but more research is shown that this isn't true.

When people turn away from science and the truth it's not all bad for the survivors at any rate. I think of the denial of care for covid as the result of the stress that increasing competition for decreased resources as changing the unit of land per person has done. It makes people so stressed that they want to reduce the overcrowding so much they don't think that dying is so bad anymore. But this wasn't
necessarily bad in evolution just another pattern. The horses shoulder being able to reach the herb was not bad for the horse that survived and a necessary part of the horses adaptation.


One of the things that they say about having climate sadness like about the ecology and feeling bad about it that if we take some practical steps and help the ecology it helps us feel better.

Other research shows that for example about forgiveness if the person have been done something wrong and they share those wrongs and tell them they've forgiven them as on the hidden brains podcast they say that in Africa they had the war and so by the village custom they all sit around the fire and confess the deed and then they say they forgive them. This actually is not helpful they find as much as we might think because there needs to be accountability about the grief and the forgiveness. Some might call forgiveness like this "cheap" forgiveness because it really doesn't change the underlying problem or have accountability as much. Doing a little something about climate grief or grief about the ecology might seem to make people feel better but as they say life is not about comfort and I think the whole general area of overcrowding or moderation about how we treat evolution in history has shaped the whole entire contour of most of history as I say on my site about this. Two golden ages both in the east and Asia and in the west in like 600 BC with Buddha and the Greek philosophers and so too then came the Middle ages for both East and West and then when the plague hit there was the Golden age after the overcrowding was reduced and then the modern age for both. To me this seems like flipping a coin eight times and finding it was heads each time with a 1/256 bet of being noncausal. This is one of the main reasons I believe the covid is a sign we be wise to hold ourselves accountable and reduce the overcrowding as with GE engineering because we would return to a time like the Middle ages or worse if we don't. Or we could return to a Golden age like the ancient classical age or the Golden age of the 1600s, the times with the overcrowding at a healthier level.

Information and The Speed of Gravity

 In the Discover magazine article "Why Does Gravity Travel at the Speed of Light?" (Link below) Eric Betz holds that the picture is quite simple....

"...The speed of gravity is just the speed of information" no more, no less. To me this seems not so definite because you may remember Einstein never actually defined what information or a signal is or was!

This doesn't look as good for relativity to me at least about the speed of gravity if we look at the definition of what information or signal really are.

In the information math there has been much debate about what the definition of information is.

People have debated so much in information science that they haven't agreed and there have been more than 70  basic definitions attempted to nail down what information is. "What is this stuff.." Right!

  Relativity and action reaction events seem to be more the basis of much and as a physicist at any rate, I would believe right at the foundation of energy conservation or relativity  we're going to find something that's more solid than most definitions of something like "even yes, right, wisdom.."

So here's my definition of information or a signal;

... "change in one place that can be correlated with a change in another place and with energy or mass exchange between those two changes to mediate the exchange"..

  As I want to say here if this turns out to be the fundamental definition of information I think this may be of value about connectivity.

  I think it's not easy to put any kind of speed on information with all of the speeds around us of information! Matter and energy on the other hand move in regular ways..

As in the collapse of the wave function or about the speed of gravity to save Relativity, some believe in information as something that doesn't travel between bodies or events. This way it can travel at any speed and allows the speed of light or gravity to fit right in because we don't know what else it could be and only because of that.

This is the same idea used by some to describe the speed of the collapse of the wave function. "It's a black box, because we can't see inside yet which we don't yet know it must be at the speed if light because of Relativity which we do know."

In the history of science, there are black box after black box being lit up, as science has gotten, brighter! Because it might be like Relativity doesn't mean it is..

I believe Einstein was so concerned about the speed of wave function events because he knew intuitively that matter is being moved from one point to another in the collapse of the wave function, at faster than light. By my definition of information and a signal there's a connection between them and not just information which seems to like it hasn't got much physical meaning and if I were Einstein and believed in relativity so much I would have been a bit concerned too.

Perhaps for just a moment in all the hustle around him he might have remembered back to when he was thinking about that idea about information and a signal and in his elation about relativity he may have forgotten that there are other truths than employees because there are employers not just employees and the moon does full at a different rate around the Earth than the Earth around the Moon and there are privileged observers part of the time that are common. 

All known fundamental interactions are mediated by the exchange of an intermediate boson. None are added on with the more slippery idea of those 70 or so other definitions of information. 

  This is why this one simple definition may narrow down all the other definitions. They may be only derived from this based on energy conservation or action reaction events in physics not math or information (as if it exists without a basis). As you may know in the history of science and math, great math has only followed great science like physics most of the time, not the other way around. This and the foundation of Relativity and energy conservation as far as it goes is why I believe my definition of a signal is the most basic and improved over Einstein's.

With my definition of information and a signal, gravity can't be forced to fit the speed of light necessarily because other definitions of information say nothing about the speed, and of course if we use this definition of information which may be the most important one Einstein didn't define, there's always an exchange of mass or energy between the two bodies or events the information travels between.

And if we accept force as an exchange of energy not just information, all energy has a speed and I think the speed of gravity as I say elsewhere not inertia may be faster than light.

This is because when we start looking at the force between masses different force always has a change of speed. And if gravity has a much reduced force it might have a much higher speed even while as I say LIGO may have found merely the speed of inertia.

This is why I think of Einstein's lack of definition of what a signal or information is was perhaps not even coincidental.

  There are a few historic events where Newton actually lied about the evidence he was boosting to get people to believe what he was saying and Einstein was aware before he was making his discovery about the shift of  the perihelion of Mercury that the shift to the perihelion of Venus was 5 times retrograde. It's been said that he deliberately downplayed the evidence about this just because he couldn't believe it was real.

So I even think it's possible his omission about defining a signal or information might have even been deliberate. I would think as smart as he was he was probably able to reach this definition more than once as he considered it.

(The idea that the shift of the perihelion of mercury may only be by way of impactors n the early history of our solar system is testable by other solar systems and we can find out if they all have a shift to the perihelion like Venus to the minus or if there is indeed some residual effect left like about the shift of the perihelion of Mercury.)

When you start to look at something definite like signals sending the information you get a different kind of idea of connection. The fields are no longer empty as Einstein believed.

When the fields are  connected as needed by energy conservation they have tension like waves as Maxwell believed to find the speed of light exactly. And waves with different tensions have different speeds, all the speeds that are possible.

In my belief you can see the heavy quanta but the waves between them may be much faster than light but they're also much lighter than light so they're difficult to find.

Even if these waves don't turn out to be faster than light I think they really may be the solution about dark matter. Dark matter may be the perfect way to connect up the events of relativity by way of the low energy dark matter field.

As I say elsewhere on some of my recent posts my belief is that above a certain density as in a singularity gravity may become so strong that it removes its own field lines, or at any rate the dense quanta that are created there that we find all around (by way of radiation outward from the superluminary jets). These become strong enough by Line Removal that gravity or anything like dark matter may essentially be invisible to the chemical events or things like electrical conductivity of the other fields.

  Remember that dark matter is believed to make up 4/5 of all the mass of the universe by different lines of research going back to the 1930s. At first appearance it might seem that Maxwell's low energy field would just connect up as usual and we can find lots of easy evidence for the waves. But so far- nothing has been seen of dark matter!

On the other hand this type of phase change combined with line removal could explain what dark matter is, how energy is conserved for Maxwell's fields and not Einstein's and why the singularity doesn't become infinite for different black holes of different mass or different radii since infinity equals infinity.

Gravity like dark matter doesn't shield and Line Removal and the phase change with the superluminal ability to change speed and phase may be why. If the Dark Matter makes up 4/5 of the mass of the Earth by this method where would it be? I think it may be both flowing in and out with only the much smaller net force we see on the mass around us.

  And no doubt moving masses, big and small with the same force would move at different speeds because the larger mass has more area in contact with the external waves and so it moves slower with the same force applied. Or about the distinction of center of mass and center of gravity for bodies in motion often seen. It's a field with tension and gravity is not the same as the higher energy com of inertia even while both have resilience.

  All this would explain what dark matter is, and why it's so tough to find and also why when you change the light or boson between two heavy quanta they both change because they're connected unlike what Einstein tells us about how there's nothing connecting them. The waves of light.. with all the experiments that prove they exist I haven't doubted them so much..

  Special Relativity is a great idea and has been a real inspiration to me but ultimately I believe it's missing some important things that are we see all around us all the time, like when you move around the room what waves are  exerting on you as you go through your swim moves..

I believe dark matter may bend light and not other matter because it's not mere gravity as some believe but also because light unlike the heavier quanta being a boson would spin at the speed of light all the way to the center and those doesn't have much Line Removal. So as I say on some of my recent posts heavier quanta such as electrons pions or electromagnetic fields have Line  Removal and in this scenario they act like they're not only inert to chemical or mechanical forces etc. but they also have internal gyroscopes to resist change more than the light. Since at high energy, light behaves like a heavy quanta when it converts over to an electron or a muon it has a change in the speed of its collapse of the wave function to faster than light inside explaining otherwise the unexplained problem of "why the muon weighs". More importantly it would now have line removal. And if light is bent differently at high energy than low energy by gravity, it's no longer a simple empty field the same as light as Einstein believed.

 Go Here for the Article about This https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/why-does-gravity-travel-at-the-speed-of-light

A Few of My Favorite Links For You...

Generally I've admired SA and the authors seem  to have also written a column about how if some don't have all there is there is no merit with the dreams doubts and deeds of the authors involved. I have kudos for the SA belief in pro science events and if it seems against the evil of antiscience and the woes it involves,  to me this seems like SA often believes in being kind to those who love the deeper truth science evolves and involves. Sometimes however the magazine seems to say some are without any merit as if they were a one science magician. I in my innocence think of my life as a series of solutions to problems, problem, solution.

 And some seem to perhaps be commenting on one of my posts about solving cellphone overuse, (Click here if you like) Most age 22 use their smartphone 10 hours a day, and the harm is caused like neural harm even after 2 hours,

As you see on my post, I discuss some valuable solutions to this problem that more than 50% now have, and on my post I live my comedy as much as any so as they say in the ancient Rome SA Latin US of Venzuela! I discuss in all comedy about just the talking horse quote, or other such  creativity in my column (it's a sort of light science event, with good celebration often involved with the SA rhetoric site also ) Why shouldn't I be allowed about talking horses and other creativity if SA allows much in comic science..

I'm allowed by what horses sing if as sing on TV. I'm generous enough so I would allow others comic relief also.

 When some may ask about there being evidence for my possible claims about the speed of gravity.

 First I offer two important pieces of evidence, as Van Flandern holds, there is no displacement for gravity between the sun and the Earth, and I think of this as important evidence about the speed of gravity being much faster than light. Others have tried to fit this to relativity by using an effect that doesn't exist where the wave train in front of the Earth's motion somehow knows without any Faster Than Light connection just how to  move ahead of the Earth in its motion and then cause the gravity by a light speed signal. We would at least expect gravity to have a forward displacement to match this magic, and near 0 displacement instead is a major problem for relativity as I say in detail on

this post. I would expect gravity to have reduced displacement at more radius by the "slow"  speed of light. Instead the galaxies all spin too fast without more gravity.

A second piece of evidence is about the collapse of the wave function, that it's instant at all points and there is no  equation for the collapse of the wave function. I believe if it is anything it's made out of something since it's about energy conservation and I don't just assume relativity holds inside wave function events just by assuming it's so as I say 


here. 

Einstein was much concerned about this and I am relaxed and soothed more!

 Most physicists believe that Einstein's ideas  aren't infinite and that sooner or later someone will find a better way to boost relativity.  Einstein said if one of his ideas go, they all go. So even one piece of evidence  like this would seem to be evidence of deeper truths. As I say on my physics Synopsis link above left this page, there are lots of reasons to doubt that relativity is absolute.

As I say I'm hoping to be of value to the world with my problem solving awareness.

I'm not just promoting my ideas about physics, I have lots of other ideas of value. What can I do for you?

Here are some of my solutions...

 I discuss how to lose weight and keep it off using timer boxes. The weight problem is in general going around and needs to be improved. Click here!

On this link I discuss my ideas about Reducing radioactivity using Reversed b decay. This was at the top of the search for about five years "reducing radioactivity" above even the government site about this.

On this YouTube Video 


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KRA1SysHVnA&t=53s

I speak of how 100s of thousands of lives can be saved each year by using mitten pocket warmers with antibacterial powder that prevents issues with doctors  who don't wash their hands as most don't in research . This is useful for people who handle money in stores or health care pros also.

Here's my site


about how anyone can learn how to be good at music. I speak 20 languages and play 10 instruments..

Here's my site


 about How I built My own Comedy Machine and Saved! This is a way to build your own paper computer with cross referencing and easy exercises, as well as using pun lists and the good and bad side of words to make your own  comedy, both for general creativity and problem solving. I think this machine may have influence in the future history of comedy with computers. 

Here's a post

 about a possible way we might cure cancer, if in the rare type of cancer cure known as abscopal cancer, the copying machine itself of RNA transcriptase has a defect that the immune system can then perhaps easily find and destroy all the cancer by a simple reliable signal, and how we might achieve this cure more reliably, as in by rnai to make the snips of rna more regular (not random so much) so the immune system might have a much improved defense by finding the regular tags on the outside of each cancer cell as I noteabout how abscopal cancer sometimes is a complete cure for some with cancer.

Here's my  Art blog, including how to for artists who want to learn how I've done this more.

On this link I discuss how the magnetic field of the solar events modulated by Jupiter itself with its much stronger influence may have influence on events like the ice ages.  Click here for more..

 

     Here's my post

 about just what neural branching events may be the source of conciousness

Asteroids might make good cheap shades against global warming.. and unlike other method being considered to cool the Earth it would be easy to reverse as I say here on Youtube..




Here's my post 


about a how a cheap method of mining asteroids may be in easy reach using lasers to boost self assembling three d printers to then print out any machine we want at the site to be mined or explored, super cheap compared to other methods just by sending more 3 d ink...

    Here's my post about how I believe the greatness of civilizations historically, has a close (aprx.80%) relationship to the basic resources that civilization had  available, by the measure of what I call 5 Foundations of History, And 5 Measures of Greatness, rated on a scale.

 Here's my post about why I believe gravity powered Machines might be good physics 
as balancing a simple weight will show..
(There are many patents on  these machines)



Here's a post about the History of Civilizations

 and how the general events seem to be closely related to the levels of overpopulation, e.g, right after the plague of the 1500s the wages went up 87%,  this would be because changing the room per person with overcrowding of the ancient world led to its decline due to increasing competition for decreasing resources, and this wasn't optimal;

  Neurons are made of proteins and I believe we might shine a huge light on ancient history as well as prehistory by finding the evidence in old neurons since they contain the memory of the entire brain as in the ideas that the brain is like a hologram as has been found in lab research. All neurons have all the memory of the whole brain as was found in lab science of the 1920's.

Here's my page about this on Youtube.

Here I want to share my idea about a possible simple way to build a fusion machine anywhere from atomic size to much larger by my hope of using natures stable geometry of the tubes of magnetic fields of atoms in a crystal so the N S unify with the force of cohesion and Coulomb's limit is overpowered by the one time use of the machine. For decontamination mostly it's without neutrons and the rest of the radiation would be collected for heat in what I name a light box, standing waves of light to stop neutrons that radiate out to protons and electrons (that is) useful clean hydrogen in a few minutes. To counteract any residual radioactivity I propose the method of reversed b radioactivity as I say on my site about this see link above..

For my Youtube video about these types of possible fusion machines


 Click here.

Here and here are two of my comedy pages for you.

These, my sites, are mostly technical sites that solve problems. Sir Isaac Newton was often arguing yet mostly how much skill he had determined the value of what he did. Behavioral resilience is a highly predictive measure of survival rates in those age 50. Employers may not be saints but they are worth listening to. Perhaps if some saw all my pages together they would be aware a lot of us aren't movie stars but were're doing fine and thriving.

Rhetoric sites

seem to have an easy job. Choose a theme and then find a quote so the players say whatever fits the agenda, plus add a bit of comedy. They may discuss about how some people are cherry picking the data in antiscience events. And for those on the internet often if they aren't good looking the search engine seems to chose the worst out of date posts that got like 27 clicks instead of the valuable ones that got 1000's of clicks.

 Authors could put their pro science praise in favor of counteracting this sort of influence. In evolution love has been found not to be about gene selfishness but rather efficiency. And this concern about looks is inefficient use of sites if it removes the site intended for the reader and instead tries to use a lower value substitute. While this is not serious and just a misdemeanor there are new ways of proving intent itself with probabilities like the program that solved the Onion software.

 I've never criticised others in science and my ideas as far as I know are ways to explain things otherwise not common and also to make definite predictions. Edison was proud not to invent war machines and I think so much of science I just want to help.

Some have asked why are some pushing just one idea? I had been spending some time with my relatives learning to grow cash crops like trees and researching a few inventions. This isn't more than uncommon or common sense on our part I would say.

If one of the ideas aren't yet perfect, science allows improvement. And if I want good dreams, I have a lot of dreams, as you see on my links list on the left.

My goal in all my activities is the search for goodwill, and I want to conserve good will more than energy with authors and the world in general!

Thanks for reading this  "resume". These are all ideas I've "devised on my own". 
For more, see my links list on left of page.. Thanks!

Cosmic Rays as A Cheap Source of Propulsion For Small "starchips" Plus..

How To Stop Chip Erosion by Cosmic Radiation and More About Breakthrough Starshot 

   You may have heard about the  problem of cosmic ray showers that originate above us (up hill all the way) these are gradually eroding computer chips. Toyota had a series of lawsuits since the chips in the autos were causing the car to accelerate about to 120 and the brakes to fail. After more than 80 people died and Toyota was interested in a higher speed settlement! The companies making the chips settled on redundancies, redundancy, redundancy... So any chip of lifesaving power like on planes or boats on plane in the ocean or a SUV over a water on a bridge, yeah right, More than 1 chip would save the ship! And both chips are checked so if one fails the other has value.

  Even so as the chips get smaller and the world gets more  round than a Toyota wheel, the cosmic rays can now  zap more and more bits; earlier chips needed  200,000 energy units to flip the bit; newer ones just need like 10.


 Some have believed that storing bits on DNA might solve the problem at any rate of 55 mph with a code that could always be read. Yet as with the original idea of all computers reading the same code instead of the real  world where there is often a babble of codes, so too the DNA storage method is already being modified to hybrid  synthetic DNA for this and it's easy to imagine all the purposes being changed for more and more  incompatible codes. I think all the code problems could be solved with a good enough sensor that has a master decoding  code, "where the code will decode  the machine" and the sensor might use matter waves of QED that are well established in physics, the most accurate method in science ever devised . And so the matter waves might converge inward and wrap around each heavy quanta to find old data even after the hardware is long gone, another possibility for a super sensor like this might be a blend of neutrinos and light. This might be like the light and electron hybrid that has recently been found that has some properties of both the light and electron. So a super sensor reads all data and uses software to convert it all to a universal cosmic code.

  Even if so DNA erodes with time due to the cosmic ray events as the chips,. So I was wondering how this might be solved. I thought of two layers one more positive and the other layer negative. The cosmic ray enters and this creates a sensor that then would turn on a third inner sensor and this would build up enough charge to  shield the chip. This might be like  electromagnetic armor like for tanks that is super strong yet light weight even so used for  the shielding for the cosmic rays, not explosions. Then I realized a better method might be to use  wires that have magnetic fields around them that would automatically become much stronger powered by the energy of the incoming  particles, to both reflect them while also using the power to power the laptop, solving both problems at one time.

************

  I think this might be used as a source of motive power for small ships like the "starchips" of the Breakthrough Starshot method. To do this we might  use a low energy magnetic bubble like this on the rear of the machine like a wire with the bubble inside behind the small machine. When a cosmic ray might move in from the direction with the motion of the ship, the larger high energy bubble at the right angle could catch the cosmic ray's force and the power is stored in the battery of the starship. A single high energy high energy cosmic ray can have as much power as a tennis ball moving at 100 mph into the Earths air, so even capturing one such event in the starchips travel might be a real boost. Since in an hour there might well be 5 showers here as outer realms, the small starships could get enough power to go much much faster that by the Breakthrough Starshot method since they are proposing giant lasers from the Earth to boost them. The actual lasers that have been built are only about 3 inches yet it's believed an a machine hundreds of feet in area would be needed. By using the cosmic ray for propulsion , while we could boost the starchips at the start  this extra boost would be much cheaper.




  And this may put many more Earthlike worlds in reasonable reach, as well as booting small machines anywhere in the solar system much faster and also we could reach Proxima B much sooner, Proxima b is the Earthlike world in  orbit around the nearest star, Alfa centauri, a good first goal for study by the Starship method. And we could reach all the Earthlike worlds in the time of  Starshot cheaper within about 2900 light years 5 times more area than the radius of Proxima B.