Typhoons and Magnetic Bubbles, a possible method of weather control.

Japan is currently using supercomputers to try to simulate how to control typhoons in project Typhoon Shot, sort of like the Apollo moon shot which was also thought to be highly unlikely but possible and it was then actually achieved.

Some say project Typhoon Shot is a mid 20th century idea just hyped up with drones and other 21st century projects and has no real change of value here.

 The plan is to either convert the typhoon power to energy for like Japan and also of course reverse the motion of the storm.

 One problem with reversing the storm like this is like when the first cloud seeding was tried for hurricanes in 1947 when a B-29 and two B-17s filled with 180 lb of dry ice, this actually caused or was associated with a hurricane reversing course when going out to sea and it instead went in to Savannah Georgia. Amid a lot of public outcry The project named project Stormfury lived up to its name for a while! and then was out of favor.

One idea I had had was that instead of wind farms on the shore which have been simulated with computers to also be able to actually recieve power from the hurricane as well as perhaps send it back out to sea, we might use magnetic bubbles stretched between two towers like on shore.

 This would also take place of wind farms which are unsightly and cause hazards to wildlife on the shore.

 I would think that these machines could even be beautiful with rainbows inside the field. Or even with jugs of silver on the side! I'm serious.

 Magnetic bubbles are not known to hold or focus light or heat well unless there's a gas inside but this could easily be powered by pumping gas into the arch.
 
 The idea is that the band would move with the wind and power the magnets on both sides, although we can imagine a moving one that moves more with the wind and restarts at the start of each loop or just one continuous one that doesn't change as much and just vibrates as the wind blows.

 Basically for hurricanes it might be the same idea at a higher level.

 One good thing about this is a cyclone creates two kT of power per second and it's more guaranteed that the storm will be moved out to sea because pressure is only from the outside.

This is also much easier to simulate to see if it would actually have value instead of complex methods like using cloud seeding.

And because the machine is mostly outside the storm it won't have to be nearly as durable to survive the storm.

 To find more power it would simply be scaled up with the money earned paying for larger and large machines and more and more value.

 Like the wind farms on the shore it would reverse the motion of the storm and find power but it wouldn't be as tough to build as other typhoon control methods might be.

 For years the conditions inside the storm weren't even known because building a machine like an anerometer to survive the extreme winds was not even viable yet.

 To build these bubbles wouldn't take 30 or 40 years like building more flimsy ships so this method might be feasible much sooner.

I would think the gas in the bubble would be valuable to exert the mechanical tension on the typhoon.

 50% more storms are hitting land like in Japan than before since the 1950s and it's also been found that the warmer air of the shore draws in the hurricane to the land, so we might be able to get a much more powerful effect by actually pumping cooling gas into the arch.

 It makes sense that the land would draw in the typhoon with heat because a typhoon is essentially a heat engine that rises like a bubble from the tropics to the northern areas and the tropics are indeed cooled by 30° by typhoons.  

 Another method might be to make the bubble vertical from inside the eye up to something large above it or else arching through the eye and over to the ship on the side perhaps around the land to exert mechanical attention on the storm.

 

 And as an additional value the same machine could be used to find usual wind power when the storm was not by the shore.



 

 

 

 

 Considerations About How Improved Habitability of Mars Might be Achieved

Here I wanted to say some more than my video and elaborate a bit more about my idea of hopefully colonizing and terraforming Mars in just years instead of centuries by spearing or putting a magnetic bubble around the side of Callisto, one of the large satellites of Jupiter. The magnetic bubble  would then react with Jupiter's strong field with a force outward and then on in a more linear future path to Mars at minimal cost for using this for the advantage of mankind. This would double the land area that we can live on in just a few years, not centuries.

 Here we would crash Callisto into Mars rapidly giving Mars a more breathable atmosphere,
pressure by this atmosphere, warmth and heat by the pressure, and also by crashing other asteroids into Mars with the right profile we might get more ideal minerals and materials for the soil that we would add on Mars by this method. In addition this would  have the advantage of a denser atmosphere which would help shield the future dwellers of Mars from harmful cosmic rays and radiation from the sun.

Elon Musk has believed that we would simply crash near Earth asteroids into the pole of Mars melting the ice and giving oxygen and water to Mars and perhaps heat.

 I had read and been taught this won't work because it will take 10 million comets and comments on Reddit! to change much.

 Lots of comets or asteroids would need many machines and be  more complex also and leave us with lots of poison and radioactive soil and Co2 and it would still be cold. (This is the reason I think we see craters in the images by the ancient flowing channels because the water stayed liquid under the pressure only for a brief time in the history of Mars and this is also why we don't find evidence of life on Mars.  Carl Sagan holds that the water probably isn't gone and is instead sealed in the ice caps, even so I think it's possible pressure not heat is why there was liquid water on Mars and this is why it was for such a brief time. Mars isn't able to sustain life because of the low gravity which doesn't have enough pressure to hold liquid water. Even so due to the low gravity I believe that there may be a large area where liquid water can exist inside Mars like in subterranean channels that might actually have life or have had it. When you go down a hundred feet inside the crust of the Earth the temperature goes up one degree, so it rapidly gets hot but with lower gravity inside of Mars there may be a much larger area where liquid water  exists in flowing channels. If as in the history of Mars there's not enough gravity for liquid water on the surface to exist for long, I think it's possible we might be able to dig large radial tunnels down to the center of Mars and increase the gravity by taking the metals from these tunnels and compressing them with fusion machines which are now almost viable. This would make them so dense  the gravity of Mars would be increased enough to hold liquid water and an atmosphere. In addition these tunnels would give us additional room to live inside of Mars. To dig them might be a lot easier than it might seem because if we had fusion power machines and the low gravity inside of Mars to start with it will be much easier to dig tunnels to the center of Mars for this purpose. Another good use of fusion might be to add on a synthetic form of soil so that we're not just living on a surface of metal or other soil that wouldn't be as healthy. This might be in our reach as well as the machines to both synthesize and disperse the soil by the new improvements about fusion power.) Blasting Mars with a larger impactor would give more heat and cleanse away more of the crust which is actually radioactive several feet down. Unlike using lots of comets my plan would change Mars to our advantage fast in a simple way.

Engineering an impactor might even help us better simulate how the protomoon hit the Earth, and improve our ideas about the formation and evolution of other solar systems.

 Originally I thought of this about using a satellite of Jupiter to improve our ability to colonize Mars as a good idea. However by more research I realized there were two other problems. One is about the radioactivity (because of Jupiter) of the water of some of the moons of Jupiter,  and the other problem as I will discuss and also for reasons I will  discount below, is  about the possibility of bad actors using this method to use an impactor to cause us harm..(this would not be a problem because it would take far too long for them to do so because the huge distance a presumed impactor or would have to travel to reach us and we would have advanced warning and be able to take action, by future methods like the DART asteroid deflector mission or many other methods to move asteroids that are being considered.)

 The four main satellites of Jupiter are  Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto. The first three Io, Europa, and Ganymede unlike Callisto, are under the influence of Jupiter's high energy radiation belt with radioactivity around it.

 Originally I thought we might have used a large satellite like Ganymede, or perhaps  Europa to crash into Mars and give us a new world to live in.

 First of all I ruled out using Io, the innermost large satellite of Jupiter for this plan because Io has a lot of sulfur volcanoes, and it's believed to have a vast ocean of molten sulfur inside which we wouldn't get much use of if we crash it into Mars since it would radiate out into an atmosphere. In addition, I think Io the first satellite of Jupiter also may be directly involved with solar storms because there's a large amount of sulfur in a torus around Jupiter in Io's orbit.

 I believe this may have major influence on solar weather and our risk of being hit by plasmas from the sun because the sun spots actually go in 22 years cycles and Jupiter's orbit is 11 years in period and so I think it's a resonance of Io's procession around Jupiter that changes the angle from the North magnetic pole of the Torus to the South Pole and reverses the polarity of the sun spots, also explaining why the sun gets hotter on the outside than inside. By this, Jupiter would be drawing off the plasma from the Sun by its stronger magnetic field from the side. Jupiter has a magnetic field of about 100 Gauss while the Sun has only about half a Gauss.

 The 22 year resonance of the Sunspot cycle by complete reversal from pole to pole might help us predict when the solar plasmas were headed to us.

 The sun spots also may have influence on biology because e.g. the tree rings by the evidence of dendrochronology also resonate in the 11-year cycle.

 This is one of the theories of the stock markets that it has 11 year oscillations and there is some evidence for this. If so the solar influence of the precession of Io may influence our behavior in a general way. After all the brain is based on electrical signals and how those signals change by way of a change in the components of the radiation from the sun, may be a good reason not to change Io.

 Thus we might consider some of the other Galilean satellites of Jupiter, for example Ganymede which has a relatively smooth surface.

 One question I asked is about the probability of life inside of Europe which many believe is possible because there's a large ocean inside of it (known from general density by gravity), and presumably geothermal heating by the sloshing of the tides to power the life.

 It's believed that the fault lines on Europa are based on a sort of tectonic circulation of the ice continually flowing up to the surface and circulating back down by way of the flow. So here I asked the question... if there's a lot of radioactivity of Jupiter because Ganymede and Europa are both inside the radioactive belt of Jupiter, it seemed possible that the circulation of the ice and water down into the ocean of these planets would make the waters of the oceans radioactive so much that they'll be sterile.

 I also thought this will be a problem for crashing one of these moons into Mars because if it has radioactive water it's not worth using for terraforming Mars.

 More recently as I looked at the pictures of Callisto, I realized it being outside the radiation belt more might not have the problem of its ocean being made of radioactive water. This is both because it's more outside the radiation belt of Jupiter, but also because unlike the other large moons we see Callisto has a large amount of cratering of the ice. This is to the point where some have described Callisto as a giant shattered crystal ball. It's believed that because the craters are remaining and the surface of the other moons are smoothed over perhaps by the heating of the radiation from Jupiter, Callisto's surface must perhaps be really old or older at any rate. So if the craters haven't been smoothed over this might bode well for this plan of using a magnetic bubble to move Callisto to Mars because it means there's not a lot of radioactivity from Jupiter melting them and so the ocean beneath might be more pure not a hazard to changing Mars more rapidly, but an advantage.

Here I also want to talk about the objection that might be raised that this method of rapidly changing Mars might be used by bad actors to try to crash an asteroid into the Earth like for a ransom.
 
 This however would take years even though it will be hugely faster than colonizing Mars with this method compared to the plan some have of boosting giant rocket boosters to Mars with supplies and materials.

 While much faster and cheaper than 10,000 years to colonize Mars, it would still take years, and be so slow that we'd have so much extra warning if an asteroid was being sent to the earth that we would need no more than a good enough sensor array and a simple deflection system which they've already tried out, so the danger of this might be actually much less than the value of colonizing Mars so rapidly and cheaply at least it certainly seems more of worth compared to other plans I'd heard of.

Goddard and Tsilokovsky were considered to be the originators of the idea of the elevator to orbit and while the elevator might be valuable, simply sending a magnetic bubble to near Jupiter might not just give us space to move around in with hardly any expense of shielding or heating and so on and ongoing constant risk of collapse or explosion for the space stations, but rather double our area of land to live on which maybe highly highly valuable. This idea which I am the father of would be much cheaper and yet higher value than the elevator. If anyone considers the elevator  this might even be worth more for our future.

Another World a Second Soap Opera!

 One possible use about this idea of cleansing Mars completely, could be that we could start completely anew with respect to chemical pollution. Like Alaska, the only state that's being planned before it's developed, we might learn to limit chemical pollution on Mars.

 This is because it's becoming apparent that chemicals like PFAs which are forever chemicals are in the ecosystem. This is the time of great disease after the time of great health before like in the 1950s. A lot of people would attribute this to pollution, and we may be looking forward to a world where fewer and fewer can have children and those children can have grandchildren, so that perhaps only 5% will be healthy and with the rise of so many diseases, that 5% will not be able to support the other 95% that are ill. One other good method of defending ourselves against the coming sea of poisonous chemicals that we're already living in, may be just the Earth because  medicinal cleansing clay can absorb out a large number (200 or more) toxins that are in our bodies!


 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 Cheaper Ways to make both Venus and Mars more Habitable

Carl Sagan says in Cosmos that all that water we see evidence for in the ancient stream channels of Mars probably maybe went into the ice caps of Mars and is still there.

 If we look at the evidence about the ancient stream beds they're right beside the craters, which means that liquid water didn't stay long on Mars or it would have eroded those craters rapidly and there will be no craters if liquid water was there over millions or hundreds of thousands of years. Many of the features show rapid erosion but that's about it.

 For this reason I think the real reason that there was liquid water on Mars for only a while was because of lack of gravity, and so if by a plan like Elon Musk's plan of crashing asteroids into the ice cap of Mars to hope to create more atmosphere and water for Mars atmosphere will only be temporary and fizzle away so the plan won't work to hold water and air on Mars anymore than the ancient labor of those volcanoes. As I discuss in my other post about hoping to crash one of the large satellites of Jupiter into Mars via a magnetic bubble (this would use the power of Jupiter's magnetic field to send the high-speed motion of Callisto off towards Mars) to give Mars an atmosphere and water much cheaper and faster than usual terraforming plans, I think we could conceivably use fusion powered excavation machines to dig down radial tunnels inside of Mars and there use the same fusion machines which are almost in reach now to compress the metals and mass of those tunnels in the center of Mars and give it gravity enough to overcome this problem completely.

 Even so Mars is far away and I think even better than just adding gravity or an atmosphere that's non toxic to Mars might be to find a cheap simple way to move Mars much nearer to the earth.

 To do this I propose that we use a satellite around a planet like Mars to move it inward or perhaps Venus to move it outward to Earth radius orbit.
 
 I think this might be achievable by satellites that have both magnets and solar collectors on them.

This method of moving a planet like Mars may be simple.. magnets on Mars, it's natural iron are used so it attracts the satellite with each orbit. The satellite goes around one loop and collects the solar energy with the magnet turned off, alternating on the next orbit with a magnet turned on.

 While this would only have a small amount of nudging with each orbit, orbit after orbit it would build up, moving Mars near to the Earth orbit enough that we have a much cheaper way to travel to and from Mars.

 Others have proposed methods of moving planets like using asteroids to nudge past and move a planet like NASA has considered in the future one day moving the Earth if the sun was engulfing it in billions of years from now about a foot for 11,000 years with the asteroids gravity per orbit. This would be much much slower then the satellite method because while each boost of the orbiting satellite is small, these are like every 30 minutes and each one will multiply and multiply the force on the planet to move it much faster.

 By using those methods of crashing a large more water-based moon into a planet like Venus we could also remove all its bad atmosphere and replace it with more healthy atmosphere for us at any rate!

 And by moving Venus  and Mars to Earth radius orbit, especially if we give gravity to Mars they won't be so hot or cold, with good non radioactive atmosphere that we can breathe with enough water, and so on. As I say elsewhere we can even give them the right amount of daytime 24 hours by setting the impacters to counter this problem which can cause really bad jet lag as the operators of the rover on Mars found. By the end of the mission they were exhausted.