The EPR, WSM, Quantum Scattering, and other Considerations for GWD, General Wave Dynamics
First, if you haven't read about GWD here's a brief review of my method of heavy interaction confinement based on relativity for you, and "then more while immediately if in Broad Band"!
If special relativity holds so well at intermediate range and energy where all the forces balance, it may have a strong influence on confinement in QCD. Even while not as strong as QCD in the zone around the outside radius of a heavy particle, to uphold relativity it may become a strong enough influence to control the decays of heavy particles and creation via the influence of relativity.
Inside the electric field relativity is "disproven", yet it always matches up to the speed of light outside, thus no fractional charges are seen outside even though they're possible by simple combinations of the fractional charges (they would have net fractional charge) and other combinations special relativity seems to disprove with no other explanation known why.
All particles known fit the fractional charge method, hundreds of particles and none have fractional charge. This is why physicists accept them as real.
Can the Bubble of Field also be the Cause of The (Einstein Podolsky Rosen) EPR?
Like the strong force, the EPR seems faster than light, and it also seems to have constant force with distance. In QCD this would be because it's held at low energy in the round bag of the electric field, as above. Yet at high energy the bag has the same volume, and is stretched into a tube, the volume of the tube or bag is the same, so the force remains mostly constant. (this dates to the 70's and wasn't my own idea, but fits well with the above.)
My belief is the EPR may be faster than light, by Maxwell's method in GWD. Below a certain energy the field may change phase to a superfluid and suddenly with much lower density it may speed up. CLICK Here For My Synopsis, (GWD/SPEED OF LIGHT) or see my link at upper left of page.
Here too as in QCD the I think the quantum bubble may be simply an electric charge well, either photons or electrons. By entanglement, the wells are fused and even by moving them apart they're inside the bubble, perhaps more like QCD than QED. Quantum electrodynamics are always outside the bubble so they radiate there. But inside the zone, the force might be more constant with distance. Thus both faster than light and constant EPR force might be explained.
How each particle, "knows" just the other I believe may be by way of a large menagerie of component low energy subparticles each with unique signature that haven't been found yet with high energy experiments.
Because the low energy field like gravity may be nonlinear, an internal acceleration, being mostly nonquantum, thus one input gives 5 unknown types of "random weighted" decay in QM. In GWD the waves are faster than light and overlap to cause the continuous acceleration Einstein hoped to achieve with gravity and the attraction that holds the subatomic physics together also. (The waves of attraction being like with gravity the opposite of the reradiance of the "thermodynamic" speed of light of relativity, would change not just wavelength but also speed in overlapping nonlinear ways.)
Thus the subcomponents are there, even so when a high speed sensing probe hits even so when a high speed sensing probe hits the real particle, the subcomponents aren't seen, "the pool is rocked" and this smooths it out by faster than light acceleration, so much Einstein's continuum seems proven even though there is already considerable evidence he was ultimately wrong. (Prions are simple fractional charge combinations that seem of value, the worth of prions seems that instead there are just the leptons and heavy quarks to combine to make out of Prions, unlike the 300 heavy particles to explain in QCD it's obvious in a few seconds, the prion combination method, devised in the 1970's has value or seems like it. All the known charges, with a paucity of surfeit, fractional and leptons, are readily made of the building blocks.
I've proposed slow changes in electrons, perhaps over months or years, to try to map out the low energy field to not "rock the pool" so the signal is seperate from the noise in hopes of finding the subcomponents.
There are some predictions I hope to make with this idea of "Long Range Confinement" LRC to explain the EPR. If QCD has a stretching of the bubble it becomes like a string and starts to resist at more radius. If the EPR is like this it may not be constant at great enough distance either as has been believed, though not yet proven. New experiments as in with GPS are in hopes of extending the EPR. LRC like confinement seems to imply there might be at least some change with distance.
Second, the "bag or string" being an electric quantum well even if long distance, would perhaps have sides, that is the light or other radiation sent through the lines connecting the EPR particles at right angles to them might show changes in energy. Even if not found right away, this "side of the well" might still be seen (no not booze if no label tastes worse, and worse!) with slow energy probes in months or years as above.
About WSM and EPR
Wave Spherical Mechanics, or Wave Structure of Matter is an idea that says all matter has both in waves and out waves at the speed of light. In GWD gravity being lighter than light might be faster than light might implode, though WSM tells us the waves are standing waves, a combination of the in and out waves. On this WSM page about the EPR Wolff explains the classic 21st century Einstein experiment;
Two photons are entangled in the center by radioactive decay and radiate to two counters on each side. Changing the angle of one filter seems to change the result of the other in a nonrandom way as if by a connecting signal at faster than light, and the force doesn't seem to change with distance.
Wolff believes "in" waves, one on each side of the zone where the photons are entangled are being influenced only at the speed of light by the waves on each side moving inward where the detectors are. Thus Wolff interprets the photons measured by filters being already connected by the EPR by the in waves at the speed of light and relativity isn't disproven.
Wolff hopes to shield from the in waves via shields outside the filters, to save WSM and relativity by influence of the in waves before they can change the outward bound entangled photons.
I would think if the in waves at near quantum energy to be merely changed by the filter are there they would have been found by Maxwell and Einstein's time. In GWD there are no in waves other than gravity. There are no out waves except in centrifugal force, the low energy particles have waves between them (Einstein said it's impossible to imagine a fundamental particle that didn't emit and absorb waves.) The particles are small, yet low energy by my use of Einstein's other idea that low energy particles solve the Uncertainty Principle because there are low energy particles like light all around that help us see boxes or cones all around us in the room, like me when I look for my eyewear, not in my power cushion! Without change of large masses like this by light to see, Einstein thought the relative mass of the sensor and what's seen seems arbitrary, he asked, "do you honestly think the moon isn't up there when you look away?" Or hows the life insurance store, not going anywhere real soon!
Thus a change of phase at low energy may make reduced mass yet low energy for the particles.
The exclusion of the fields may be by the conservation laws, where electromagnetism "disproves" gravity inside and shields the strong force, the strong force then might disprove relativity perhaps by faster than light as in Chao's experiments, this by being with fractional charges a bit lighter than light also being a bit faster than light by the conservation laws.
The small particles that may cause both gravity, the EPR "code" and centrifugal force being not fundamental like the ultimate waves could emit and absorb waves on the outside giving the resilience of Maxwell's medium. They would act like a superfluid as some others think of about gravity and they would exert pressure to cause centrifugal force.
There may be so much room between the zones of particles like heavy mesons or leptons the small "Einstein" particles would flow in the spaces without much friction.
I believed inertia was just a sort of unpowered gravity. Centrifugal force would have just the particles but particles tend to radiate out. Thus gravity may have the extreme high speed in waves with speed as by my hope to reuse Maxwell's method in GWD. The waves being continuous unlike centrifugal force would be needed to hold the world together since the particles being disconnected would radiate out otherwise. The waves are much faster even though they may be tougher to find, though astronomers are already hopeful.
Gravity doesn't shield because the particles would flow around the "real" heavier particles exerting pressure, but like a superfluid it would flow from cold to hot and unify with negative entropy before by pressure the particles would radiate even with gravity. Matter is also highly permeable with this update of La Sages method he used to solve gravity since by negative entropy and flowing in the spaces beween the heavier masses particles it would gain entropy and have negative resistance to the inner motion of the particles..
A problem with centrifugal force would be that it also doesn't shield, e.g. metal plates in experiments. The gravity waves aren't present here to unify. This is why Einstein's particle might also need to emit and absorb waves of its own. If you have a field of the particles and you spin the wheel, how do the particles near the center know to radiate out?
With Einstein's relativity, there was a revival of Mach's ideas about inertia; if you have a spinning wheel or bucket, somehow all the cosmos is connected up and the bucket "knows" to have concave water when in acceleration. (Though this is about relativity of motion in GWD there is motion (Why, Why not?) though with gravity and mass, the heavier mass tends to be more at rest and has less and less motion and's more valid.)
The connection only shows up during acceleration and can't be gravity, it's far too weak. A tiny centrifuge can have billions of g's.
Thus by way of Maxwell's resilient medium, the particles of inertia and centrifugal force are attractive with outer waves and the inner "Einstein" particle also may exert pressure of the force. The wheel starts spinning and the NS of the particles might connect them in tiny streams or bands like magnetic fields. The ones on the outside might radiate out and draw more in to out, (with simple complexity!) and the outer flow would cause the force. By field exclusion, the Einsteins might flow also like gravity in the spaces between the heavy particles. (Field exclusion may be important to all forces; without it there would be infinite implosion.)
In this model, centrifugal force doesn't shield even though it's radiant unlike gravity because these low energy motes have waves between them, and they are excluded from the dense fields in GWD so while they exert pressure of centrifugal force unlike gravity they also have low positive or negative entropy (friction) in this possible way of centrifugal force.
By the general (not exact) equivalence of gravity and inertia, in GWD if gravity doesn't shield neither does inertia because they're generally the same but also distinct since, e.g. the equation for centrifugal force is much unlike gravity (mass in the only thing they have in common, yet two masses for gravity and just one for centrifugal force. "If it's relative like Einstein believed, this one mass is relative to what? Not the rest of the cosmos, just the flow of the field near it.")
The particle would be what make gravity and inertia seem the same as Einstein believed, yet the high speed wave would be why the distinctions are also numerous. Gravity would be like a long range bubble and inertia is like the "electromagnetic" speed of light being shorter range and contained within the gravity; in GWD inertia is contained in gravity, and thus if inertia is generally at any rate like gravity and gravity accelerates, a large component of the acceleration may be because of the resilient Einstein particles, even so, acceleration (only) may change then by way of conservation of linear and angular momentum. If this field of particles has neither positive or negative net entropy this would be how it can exert centrifugal pressure yet not shield as if by pressure or friction.
There is positive entropy if you go up the superhighway and these particles were being ploughed through by your boat, not if pushing the van! There's no wave on the opposite side of the SUV's in the other lane since the net entropy is low, a Promethean form changing method of finding better than mythology..
You start the cosmic elevator like Einstein so often used to lift his methods and the push is felt yet once you stop the machine it disappears. Actually I believe the entropyis there (to e.g. cause particle spin by acceleration) it may be merely below the quantum level of like the light operating "inside relativity" or also outside it, there are real forces (not just inertial pseudo forces) in all physics or the fields would stop moving.
Relativity seems about "the vain appearances of light" to me. GWD seems more complete, until or if disproven, while beauty is real, acceleration to change of wavelength (momentum, thus speed of light in a nontrivial sense in relativity) are not to be discounted either.
