SPIN MOTOR

Einstein was smart, even so there were many things he didn't find. To me he seems sort of like a creative interpreter of the cosmos, like a painter who sometimes adds in special highlights and hopes of his own who leaves some of the vision out or in.. He often contradicted himself even in his greatest moments, perhaps if he just changed the angle of his vision, the vibrations would come in from the cosmos somwhat at another energy changing his vision! One example of a simple idea he could have perhaps won another nobel prize  with is the molecular gyroscope, recently invented, that may be a super sort of battery to store huge amounts of power of super efficiency. I liken a conventional chemical battery to like collisions of a car, that wears out gradually and much loss of energy because of the quanta, to extract power takes methods of overcoming the quanta, this causes more friction, ect. The molecuar gyroscope, via the continuum of the lower energy fields even if smooth still stores and converts the inertia and mass to energy with much higher effeciency since unlike the electric field the magnetic field of the poles where the mass and energy are converted in and out is not quantised ect. The idea is a great idea not even Einstein thought of though he could have anytime he was alive and with "old science" of the early 1900's.

Here's Another Idea Vis a Visa;

We often here of these statements that a handfull of stuff could be used to power New York City by conversion of all the mass to energy..


I believe mass and energy are equivalent mostly (and completely for quanta at higher energy though not perhaps for gravity where the galaxies are spinning too fast for gravity to not be more reinforcing. After all it's an acceleration).. If we look at that mass and convert it to energy if mass is just spinning energy, we may say to convert mass to energy completely, all the spin is converted to more linear motion. There is a huge amount of linear motion in usual mass, where is it in usual life? Most of it cancels out.


To line up the spins is perhaps a way to find the energy. If we take two gyroscopes say of 10 foot pounds of force each that spin at more than one attiiude, it will take less force to align them for the mass conversion, say half a foot pound than is in the spin a much more powerful real of power. so too for small machines.


This seems like an asteroid or other heavy mass that's moving at high speed, it takes far more force to stop it head on than to change its speed from the side a bit to miss the World (so we won't miss the world!).


If by aligning the spins and then the machine has power we collect via the magnetic fields, this would perhaps be a way to find the strong force that powers the outer spin of the molecules, by way of the field. The alignment of the field would multiply up the machine.


You may say, why hasn't anybody thought of this before? Surely someone would have? But Einstein never thought of the molecular gyroscope. New innovations are being found each month.


This may be of worth since it's partially the strong force it may be a way to convert lots of mass to energy yet unlike atom powered physics the radiatioactivity may be an also ran. Any matter of any type might be of SPIN machines, so elaborate mines may not be needed.


I read of an inventor where I live in in VA of the early 80's who supposedly invented a permanent magnet motor to solve the energy crisis. You may say this will never work because energy conservation says you only get out what you put in, right? For longer distances energy conservation works well but at short distances the spins no longer cancel. A small wire beside the gyroscopes that would generate current in the wire near where the spin doesn't cancel. However the collection would be simpler if the N and S of each gyro is without quanta and more mass to power. 


Do we always only get out what we put in? If this were so we would only get out the same for the strong force or even hydroelectric, ect. There is no theoretical reason other power may not be found like the SPIN machines. To align the spins perhaps gasses could be condensed to solids, and so on.

I can think of another use of molecular gyroscopes. Machines that convert oscillation to linear centrifugal force in just one direction (a slice of wheel not the en tire wheel!) have been in the IP for years, and I saw a site about how all the UFO sightings (I don't believe in saving this when the dish is unidentified when I eat out) could be explained by more advanced use of existing physics; e.g. an inertial force machine to power the "UFO" without sound or turbulence would use rings with a weight on one side and to aim the force of inertia the wheel just is sped up on one side as it spins in the direction to exert force. Using a molecular machine like powered by the gyroscope could be simple, low maintenance, an it would exert a huge force because centrifugal force is much stronger for small gyroscopes than larger ones, the common gyroscopes of older use explode due to lower strength of materials, even so the smaller ultracentrifuges have forces of billions of g's because they don't explode.
..