About Breakthrough Starshot, CME Events, And the Einstein Lens Used To Sense the Surfaces of Earth like Worlds; and A Possible Way To See The Lights of Distant Cities on The Surface of Earthlike Worlds With Advanced CiviIzations, if They Exist....


Here I want to restate what I was saying about the way of finding the CMEs and more for you about how and why this might be most optimal for us..Here I'll also discuss  two new types of telescopes, a gravity lens telescope being considered, and a telescope perhaps light-years in size by my own possible improvements on the Breakthrough Starshot methods also being devised....


CMEs are giant plasmas from the Sun and they may damage the power grid and the internet for years at a time and experts say we're overdue for more CME events. They now know this based on probabilities based on more evidence based on more history than was before!

 Engineers  built the power grid before they knew about CMEs from the historic record so when the power plants were built they didn't know that they should have built them with backup generators like diesel engines. And so CME plasmas are considered a risk because they may cause multiple nuclear meltdowns and slow the power grid or bring it down for years at a time and reduce hospital life support machines, or shut down gas stations so trucks can't send food or goods, and the internet and sattelites may be out for years and other types of infrastructure damage and harm may be caused by the CME.

 On my other video in the my comments area I was talking about how I consider a relatively cheap and most optimal clean up solution (since when I was selling soap on soap operas a month and wow the exercise lady cleaned right up) we could send simple sensors in an array around the Sun; they're made of quanta entangled with quanta we already have here and the EPR faster than light connection Einstein was spooked about may be a  good sensor connection.

 This is related to methods like the Breakthrough Starshot using small starchips, the smallest satellite in the world, Starchips would weigh an ounce or lighter. These super small payloads boosted by lasers like the Starshot method being considered may be a cheap fast way to send sensors  anywhere in the solar system. And  this would help us stop the power grid shutdown without losing billions of dollars and without the cost of false alarms, so we won't have it almost like we had  when a large CME passed by the Earth in 2012.

   About these plasmas I think we could send just a simple EPR sensor which might cost literally $0.10.  It wouldn't really cost much for the fuel to boost it because it's a light weight payload.

As with the Breakthrough Starshot method I believe that these light payloads could simply be sent by focused lasers much sooner than having to wait a half a year to reach the Sun with boosters and at much reduced cost.

And as I say on my other video about the Breakthrough Starshot I think the EPR Einstein, Poldosky, Rosen could be used in combination with the asymmetrical collapse of the wave function in series as a highly efficient and lightweight way to decelerate the sensors so they don't just speed right on, past the sun or Proxima B, and our image isn't as high resolution otherwise (Proxoma B is the Earthlike world recently found orbiting Alpha Centauri, the nearest star).

This use of the collapse of the wave function is being considered by some as a super efficient battery, storing energy with mass energy level efficiency, sort of like the matter antimatter conversion levels, these are far higher than fission levels which only convert 5 percent of mass to energy.

 Unlike antimatter, storing and transporting uncollapsed quanta would be much easier even if the output wouldn't be as extreme.

 We could send the chips more slowly with conventional boosters and put the sensors into orbit around the sun if, as some believe the lasers may not be optimal for this use.

 While it may cost billions to shut down the power grid for a while, this would usually be cheaper than false alarms that might cost billions more with more expensive or more unreliable sensors since experts say the power would need to be shut down each time a CME may be headed our way. Shutting down the power lines is considered to be our best option by reduced resonation with the plasma just without each false alarm so the risk of CME harm is reduced at the lowest cost and shutting down the power when we know a CME is headed our way is also viable.

 Other hardware like transformers that are being built are much more expensive and would be more time consuming than this EPR sensor laser boost method.

 When you compete with a machine like a chess computer, if there's any move that can lose the match the chess machine will use most of its time and resources (if not more and more!) stopping the one event. We haven't learned much from how the chess computers beat human players as was believed so humans would learn more savvy methods of play when they were being devised. Even so if we could lose so much with CMEs,  I would say that at least we could learn some valuable general maxims from the machines about life. And this might be true, if we can lose all the prize, then it's wise to spend a lot of time considering our defense, against CME's or other issues if so.

Finally I want to discuss the recent plan to send a fleet of sensors to a focal point of Einstein's gravity lense of the sun. Simple geometry shows this will give us real images of the surface of Earthlike worlds, not a one pixel world seen by our machines here in 2019. While insight is good, sight may enlighten us more...

 I believe the use of the Starshot methods as above, starchips, lasers, plus EPR connection and braking by the wave function, may make it cheap enough that we could send a swarm of the starchip sensors in a 360 swarm all the way around the sphere of the sun with lots of focal points of many Earthlike worlds and the universe and a lot of cheaper images. And in just a few hours at Starshot speeds we could begin our research plus real time control and not have to wait more than 10 years while sending larger old fashioned satellites to just one zone as in the method being considered...

It's been calculated that a telescope a million times the size of Hubble would be enough to see the lights of the cities of an advanced civilization on the surface of distant worlds if they exist. This was how I originally concieved it,  a telescope perhaps light years across more outside the solar system used by  starchips by these methods and unifying the signal of all these sensors so even more resolution would be seen than the Einstein lens method above. This telescope would be more a giant sphere than a gravity focus lens but it also might be any concievable size, even light years. Even so for the time being the gravity lens method might be of worth while we consider building these more giant machines.

Thanks for Reading my site, read more as much as you like..Thanks.

What About THE MULTIVERSE?

  "It doesn't Make Predictions or Explain Much.."

I was skeptical of another cosmos! Right from the start!

I'm thinking, like, you know, it seems unusual! The main problem seems to be about connectivity of our cosmos with the other cosmosis, cosmosis is this like an inflammation..Right..

Connectivity... what connects our cosmos with all these others?

Sometimes it may seem e.g. like when I speak of other science, e.g. about overcrowding, it may look like mine is a political idea, but I assure you my goals are completely science based, and comedy based..

Newton said he didn't care as much for the outside world as just his time with math and physics, and I believe reducing the overcrowding peacefully by way of reducing competition for increased resources is far more worthwhile and will have far more influence of value on the world than any level of politics, which seems to be failing often, and like Edison I believe war is a tainted enterprise, and politics seems no more viable than most of our life is life is not living, but living well.

But I'm in favor of what

I know (or most of what I know!) and here I offer evidence against the multiverse.

About connectivity, I'd only heard that Tegmark was the promoter of the Multiverse idea. After I'd read that Hawking, Mercini Haughton, and others were in  promotion and that Feynmann was the original editor, up, up and more! I'm thinking, Feynmann! Cool dude. So there is some science here. Where general science goes I often follow.

.

Einstein believed in something like the Multiverse. In one of his last letters to Von Neumann, he said that time doesn't exist. So far so good, more to the point, Einstein believed that before the collapse of the wave function, all futures are possible. This seems to be the cause of the Multiverse idea.

 My original suspicion about the Multiverse, was, what connects us here in our universe with our twin in the other universe? Actually, the multiverses seem like a sort of vast way of rolling the dice, they aren't really connected, just that any possibility exists somewhere out there. Connection really seems a problem since these machines would seem to need infinite hardware to acheive all possibile events, and this would take infinite mass, and this would have infinite gravity, implosion down to 0. Were're here and not here, reductio ad absurdam, doctors could never hold hostages, who could read the ransom note?

About the collapse of the wave function, George Ellis, a physicist from England has the belief that all the possible events are selected out by the collapse of the wave function, like by gravity, the wave function automatically collapses at enough distance, like 2 yards here in our monocosmos..(while I think this idea has problems, i.e. if it's the "edge of time" going up to the Near Earth Orbit has 0 gravity, so time should stop, and e.g. since some radio waves are miles across, it would stop radio astronomy by collapsing the wave function as the wave passes by a strong source of gravity in the distance, and e.g. this would change the spectra of all the stars in ways not seen by astronomy in the lab here with common spectra. Even so I believe just jostling around the quanta would be enough combined with some gravity to give disproof of Einstein's idea about all futures being possible.)

 If this gives us the selecting out of the time that Einstein was unaware of, the events of the quantum wave before the collapse would need connection by something like electric charge ionization or changes in other quantum numbers to have influence. I believe this zone is special, it's lighter than light, so it may compute much faster than light. This is how Schrodinger's cat seem's both alive and dead. The wave function before collapse is a wave, it's non quantum. In subatomic physics Special Relativity has never been seen to be violated in even one experiment. I think of this as due to a change of phase. Make the field low enough energy, and it converts over to faster than light spin. The wave function collapses instantly, and at all points. SR holds so well because at the quantum level or higher, the plus and minus electric charges Maxwell used to predict the speed of light so well based on the forces between them are indeed now quanta. The quanta are constant, so is the speed of light.

Information theory says that information can never be created or destroyed, but higher information is created and destroyed all the time. The same foam  that was used to make your shelf is recycled to make cheeze pizza. In truth information isn't a quanta since you can't know just where the edge is, and waves themselves, like number in math are slippery and not easy to define in a fundamental whey of cheese!

 Selecting out the more amorphus events like Shrodinger's cat involves making them definite. If they aren't definite before the cat-astrophe they have no external influence..

 Thus unlike Einstein Tegmark and others, I believe the possible futures not only aren't many worlds, they have no influence in the sense of relativity, and they only can collapse to limited allowed states, conserving e.g. electric charge, lepton number, baryon number, and so on. The internal events like the EPR and the collapse of the wave function seem to be disproofs of relativity. The EPR is a weak effect, and this isn't strong enough to influence the heavier quantum events much, this is the only sense I believe in the many worlds. I believe in general  Einstein and Feynmann were both wrong. Relative to the quanta, the many worlds idea would only exist in definite, limited ways.

  Ellis was saying, if the future exists in all ways and times, you go to the future and change it, or go to the past and change it..If time is the wisest of all teachers like wealth, the cosmos seems so labor saving..