HOW I SURVIVED A PLANE/TRAIN/BOAT WRECK!

WITHOUT LOSING THE REST OF MY RUG!
.-You may have heard of the TGV, the railroad In Europe and the catostrophe they had when it had a high speed pileup. A way to make crashes so most people would survive is believed to be via use of smart materials that self strengthen on impact by electricity generated mostly by the impact on the outside of boxes built in each room of the plane or train. The boxes would each be seperate units in an accident. The beams on the outside of the box would be self strengthening plates by electric power under compression, this would be like the army's electromagnetic armor that is real lightweight (the boxes would be both airplane and train crash proof) but with an incoming explosion from outside the tank or jeep it strengthens up via electric fields to stop it. This is like other smart materials that change to adapt, like tyres that go from round to rain, and with a uniroyal burp! To stop the box occupant from being bounced around at 200 mph, the inside would have powered pads. These would inflate and hold the survivor in fluffed up air from both sides once the main motion was stopped by the main air bag. The inventor says each bot would have it's own air,water, food, and emergency power, so says , and would be inflammable.

.
STUFF RECYCLES

A big recycling machine for landfills would be of value and would sort all the debris by sensors, and convert all the rich stuff to precious ancient shrines, speaking of spiffing up to high afterlifes, this would be more efficient for the environment. This takes recycling to it's highest fuji, since strategic materials and compounds won't last forever without recycling. They would just dump the stuff in a big bin with the scoop and it would see all the stuff with computer sensors and good computations, and sort it all in the machine, refinding all the materials of value, combining the toxic with other compounds to stop it's flow, and using a simple boom with augur to add more than the ancient world.

A use of the science of the Mars plane with air filled wings they've devised would be of a porch roof which opens and shuts via input or output of more air.

.If they're auctioning off trips to orbit on Amazn, hope the bids go higher. This Business Brought to you by Yamazoom!
.
...

In ancient Greece Zeno believed if the world was many and not one paradoxes arose;

problems of expansion that lead to infinite expansion of space because of essentially is entropy of the many particles of thermodynamics. These disproofs of the many were about the apparent unlimited division of subatomic particles (held in one by the then unknown force of gravity). Unstopped division of subatomic physics via entropy (flow of heat mostly from hot to cold) would lead to more and more infinite wheels in wheels. And the room between the wheels would expand out to infinite distance, this was the ancient greek observation of entropy in common life. "If the Existant is Many, it must at once be infinitely small and infinitely great-infinitely small because its parts must be indivisable and therefore without magnitude; infinitely great because, that any element having magnitude may be seperate from any other part, the intervention of a third element having magnitude is necessary, and that this third part may be separate from the other two the intervention of the other parts having magnitude is necessary, and so on ad finitum." Another of the paradoxes is "if all is in space, space must be in space, and so on ad finitum.".

This type of problem is solved by physics out of reach to Zeno about the gravity holding off the cosmic expansion.

~~~

problems that lead to disproof by contradiction

Zeno used many paradoxes like the above about the unlimited division and the unlimited expansion both to disprove the many. Even so general contradiction is found in all of physics, like Newton's Law of action and reaction, or energy conservation caused by a balance of opposites like a scale to weigh mass and energy, so this is actually proof of all there is so it can't be disproof of anything. When you ask which of the two opposite truths is greater like with experiments to see if explanations are valid, contradiction without experiments can't always be used as disproof, so general contradiction without evidence is not proof of Zeno.

With the "liar paradox" of the ancient greeks, if someone says he's lying, if he's lying, he's lying, and if he's telling the truth about lying, so he's both lying and telling the truth, with two opposite motifs in the same sentence. This idea was used by 20th century polymaths to supposedly prove that essentially nothing makes sense or can be proven about anything, and that all is infinite, as in Godel's Incompleteness theorem. If you have one and minus 1 on the number line and put a minus before the 1, it's minus 1, and with another minus before the minus 1, if it's minus 1 it's minus 1, but if it's minus minus 1, it's plus 1. While this is the form of the Liar Paradox, it only holds up till you measure what the numbers on the line are made of, here you'll find like men and women, cool and hot, bad and good that plus and -1 are always unalike in real life, this mostly solves the Liar Paradox and is why I believe mass and energy aren't quite the same as Einstein thought. If mass is the minus one and energy is the +1 and electric charges were thus the same, true and false would be the same as in the Liar Paradox. With a subatomic particle of 0 charge overall it's found that the magnetic field of the two opposite charges that make of the composite particle is not quite 0, this would be disproof to some extent of Einstein's idea that mass and energy are Equivalent, in truth this disproof of the equivalence of matter and antimatter seems to be another disproof of the absoluteness of relativity.

Contradiction is not disproof, but one of the two opposites will be of more worth than the other, there are no waves and particles at the same place and time even though there are always pairs of both like action reaction pairs of mass and energy, so energy conservation holds well. Even so the contradiction of the balance of opposites exists and to explain them of necessity must involve compromise. There really must be two opposites at the same place and time to some extent, otherwise there are paradoxes and there would be no way the opposites could all be unified by energy conservation, paradoxes must be used to explain paradoxes, and this is the truth but it doesn't mean physics all around us is infinite. Thus it would seem the cosmos is just somewhat paradoxical but not infinitely so.

Problems that lead to disproof by an infinity of smallness

e.g. if the many exists, when a slow and fast speed were compared like the famous runner and tortoise, both speeds would have to cross an infinity of points to go from one point to another. And since infinity is infinity, all motion would be at the same speed with the assumption of infinite points between two regions of space. Newton supposedly solved this by assuming that as you divide the points, they would have smaller and smaller size to fit an infinite number of particles in so the infinite room was solved. While there would be an infinity of particles within particles in number, they would have smaller and smaller size to fit in a usual space like our usual room around us.

Einstein believed mass/energy and space/time are unified. So another problem with Newton's solution of Zeno's paradox (in light of Einstein) is about the mass of the particles. If you go to smaller and smaller size, you have more and more particles, they are distinct, and this is a property of the particles. Indeed any property of infinite particles within particles would take some mass and energy to maintain it because of the unity of the mass and energy and space time. But with the infinite particles this would cause infinite mass of the usual mass around us by way of the combinations of any property the particle would have and this is not so. And like with Zeno all motion would be the at the same speed.

So while Zeno is disproven by gravity, and contradiction is not disproof, the third problem of the paradoxes because of all motion being at the same speed was not solved by Sir Issac.

The conclusion by this would seem to be, because paradoxes are more of worth and necessary to solve than more unified math and the infinity of uniform motion not being solved if there is no smallest particle, a smallest elementary particle must exist.

_______

It would seem by Zeno there can be no ultimate particle because if there were it would be unchanging and solid so it couldn't interact; all the change around us can't be built out of absolute particles. At least they must change somewhat, meaning they would seem more divisable, and so on to infinity, with the same problem of all motion and distances being the same.

With no smallest particle there would be infinite particles within particles having infinite mass which has not been observed. This means there both must be a smallest and not be a smallest particle.

But with waves or particles one or the other will be more of worth than the other, just as beauty is of higher worth than what's ugly.

Even though there would be a true elementary particle like the Higgs, waves by the above are more fundamental, one or the other would be moreso. Einstein's gravity waves would be smaller yet, with no resistance when they flow between the most elementary particles, explaining why gravity doesn't shield much eclipse after eclipse as in the age since historians wrote about the eclipses hours of time in ancient times, with no slowing down of the moon. (The founder of ancient greek philosophy one of "The Seven Wise Men" of ancient greece got much fame by stopping an ancient war in battle by knowing when there was an eclipse, to the suprise of the combatants who were calmed!) If the elementary waves were much solid gravity would shield. Gravity is continuous like a wave because smooth waves alone operate by continuous contraction, the basic foundation field. All particles interact by gravity, the most important cosmic force.

It might seem that the problem of the infinity of the particles at the limit would be solved by just making the force that would hold each particle together or make them distinct also become smaller and smaller so it would converge to waves at the limit. But there would still be the problem of all motion being infinite and the same as in the above about Zeno.

If waves are indeed more fundamental this idea may throw light on how and why they are. While particles would need force to make them smaller and smaller and keep them distinct, waves being of larger size or many sizes would be able to operate with less friction, more self sustaining and so would be more fundamental. Gravity would be "cosmic". It would keep all the thermodynamic entropy from winding down via the Second Law of power conservation over infinite time by attraction. You may say, gravity is finite, what's so amazing about this? If you wind up a watch, what's so unusual about it? Well, you exist for a while and wind up the watch, but the cosmos winds itself up and exists forever. It's infinite (in time). At least in the sense of the gravity, its an immortal life that powers all that exists. While there will be science up to the level of the foundation force, there may never be science beyond this level .

Usual mass around us is seen with the probe of light much smaller than the mass measured by the light. Einstein's conclusion about the Uncertainty Principle may have been that it would be just a coincidence if gravity is the foundation force. The value of the strength gravity would have that would attract via pressure up to the power of the electric field and then to the strong force and higher, is arbitrary. So the strength of the the strong force and electromagnetism energised up to at near the same power level is a sort of coincidence. Gravity is axiomatic, being the cause of all the cosmos because of the conservation laws and the unity of energy conservation and conservation of momentum and other laws like the uniformity of physics. As I say in my Three Foundations of The Cosmos link, by the evidence for the conservation laws of subatomic physics, I think gravity the lowest power field energises up to the power level of the electric field which then energises up to the strong force and so on with all the forces via this basic field as one by energy conservation.. It creates the electric field by attraction and then the electric field would create the strong force. So all three forces and the relative strength of particles and beams to see them that have to be made of these forces in subatomic physics is just luck as Einstein thought and not fundamental. If gravity (by luck) had another value, the forces might be much distinct like with usual mass and light to measure it and the Uncertainty Principle is like via Einstein.The probe is just at near power with the measured subatomic mass by coincidence of how much the basic field would bunch up to make the other forces. So for more general physics the sub particles of subatomic physics like the Higgs the smaller mass would have smaller size, and more mass would occupy more room, like the usual masses around us. Gravity and/or the Higgs and/or the graviton in the discontinous particles, not the waves (they may be all the same) would use low uncertainty to be the cosmic source of all the other forces. If you go to many lands and you have an international language, it probably wouldn't be a sloppy translation. All is one in the basic field and this would need a causal link by definition at least in the noncontinuous realms of the field. The subparticles of gravity would have many sizes to attract all masses great and small, so beyond a certain level of power, the smaller the particle or wave the smaller the size, because you would be able to measure a large particle with another without much influencing it. This was Einstein's explanation, and more recent low energy quantum experiments seem to uphold it. But waves would be more fundamental yet and this would also solve the wave particle duality.

The problem of the loops are disproof of the Uncertianty Principle; if by it when you go to a smaller and smaller radius of a particle the mass is more and more. So a particle of indefinite or 0 size would be infinite in mass. The lack of infinite gravitational mass of subatomic particles with gravity not shielding is disproof of the Uncertainty Principle.

.

More About the Higgs

The Higgs particle was named after physicist Peter Higgs about 40 years ago. Most physicists think the Higgs is a real way to explain what causes mass. Some name the Higgs "The God particle" since most of the properties of subatomic physics and all the rest of the cosmos from this may be derived from the Higgs. While they haven't yet found the Higgs it's believed it would operate by how it adds it's own multiplying force to the elementary particles of subatomic physics. While I think it's not impossible the Higgs exists, it may be more of 2nd or 3rd level of mass than a more general idea-mass is spinning energy in my formulation, and energy is just more linear mass. This is what we find all around us in the world, not a god particle or the ultimate foundation yet. What is the Higgs (or it's equivalent) made of itself? Because of Zeno's conclusions it must be made of smaller subparticles, and these made of smaller subparticles, ad finitum. The main limit would be of field compression; if the cosmos is finite and hasn't engulfed us in infinite energy it can just compress so much by gravity, no smaller subcomponent particles than that of the most dense particles of the maximum compression, no more. But gravity waves are what would cause the compression and they would not be made of the Higgs, the Higgs would be made of the compression, the Higgs is a particle more than a wave, even so both the most elementary particle and the waves would both be made of either spinning or linear motion, and motion not the Higgs is the most elementary, other physics would be beyond the Higgs. What would be the Higgs may control a lot, but combinations of the most elementary particles with the low energy waves could be of more use, e.g. to control "currents" of super small superlightweight or superdense wires made of the Higgs.


You may know it's easier in subatomic physics by Einstein's E mc2 to convert mass (of durable discontinuity) to energy (smooth waves) than a like amount of energy to mass (Particles are more about mass because they attract to solid elements and energy is the opposite because energy lifts us and the earth's mass being the opposite, implodes ). But this is just in subatomic physics. For the more general physics of gravity and the cosmos on a large scale, It's easier to convert the waves of gravity to mass by compression. If gravity didn't win out overall over the subatomic physics like entropy, without more implosion to have caused the subatomic fields, the cosmos would have lost power and energy conservation would have been violated. We couldn't be here if gravity were not with implosion always outdistancing the outward expansion of thermodynamic entropy.

The cosmos would start to maintain the all by the implosion, it being more of cosmic worth, and then expand when compressed beyond a certain compression by heat, fusion or other force. If it started to expand as the first of my motifs of the cosmos, the expansion would violate energy conservation because all power would have been fizzed out with no attraction of the cosmos by definition. While the implosion of the field is used to explain the cosmos, and the expansion then would balance the attraction, the gravity must always win long range so gravity is the field of most international worth and more. Because waves with more volume of room occupied are generally longer range than particles, the waves of gravity would outdistance masses, and good news! No mass or us will ever fall out of the cosmos!

Mass must be derived from one field to unify all the physics and explain the uniformity of nature and energy conservation, and so on, so gravity is more attractive so it's more continuous like a wave. But the graviton, a source of solid mass, would exist also, or mass would have no source of definition. The Higgs and this graviton wouldn't necessarily be the same since gravity is of much lower energy.

The Higgs is thought to have 60 times the mass of a proton or so while being elementary.. At first glance this would seem counterintuitive, since the Higgs also would be short range so all the subatomic particles would have huge mass and a volume of space would also be of high density.

Higgs the physicist believed the mass of the Higgs particle was derived from the Uncertainty Principle. With the Uncertainty Principle when distance is small the volume becomes a smeared out wave, and the mass is also uncertain, so a much larger mass is allowed than usual. If the Uncertainty Principle is not the foundation of physics, the volume of the room around the Higgs would have a foamy continuum of electromagnetism at the slower speed of light. But inside the region if there were mass of 60 or so times the proton at any time, it would have that much more gravitational mass. It wouldn't have smeared out mass because of the much faster speed of the matter waves of subatomic physics like in Einstein's own EPR paradox or the Bell Theorem they're now using on faster than light chips in the lab. So while the volume would be foamed out by the "slow speed of light" gravitationally, all the particles being made many of the Higgs would weigh hugely more, because gravitational mass never shields in astronomy much or elsewhere so while the Uncertainty Principle would seem to allow the Higgs, the Higgs would be at lower energy than the predicted value of the standard theory of 60 times the mass of a proton. Click Here for my Physics Synopsis (faster than light, and other physics).The Higgs is of worth in the Ghost Particle Theory (I think The "ghost" causology is a good explanation of Relativity and improves it much) but the Ghost particles would have o mass in the Ghost vision of gravity and inertia that's been devised, which uses the pressure of downward flow of particles like the Higgs to explain gravity by pressure of the field made of the Higgs and to explain centrifugal force and gravity well. See my Ship and Field Theory for more.

.The smallest particles of the cosmos must be somewhat with wave properties but fundamental waves being continuous, as is known about the electron in subatomic physics would be without the necessity of having actual size. The smallest (discontinuous) elements like particles must have behaviour of both waves and particles because if they were just indivisable particles they couldn't change in any way. All around us is change, so the absolute unchanging energy of indivisible elements is disproven by this. On the other hand waves are in constant change, or gravity waves at any rate would be, they never stop or lose power. While the wave of gravity flowing around the smallest cosmic elements would be small, to conserve connectivity, a matter wave like about the electron may have what amounts to no real size, this is what they say experiments prove the electron is about. While the ultimate gravity waves from which all other continuity would be derived in my explanation has to have some particulate property so the particles are created from this wave, ultimately all other connectivity is derived from this foundation field by axiom. Here is the source of all connectivity, with gravity the foundation more than other forces and this being the source may have no real building blocks, so we wouldn't have to be able to say what or where the wave's size is. It's both smaller and larger than the smallest particle, so this would solve the problem of the smallest particle extending from absolute continuity of no resistance flowing through the interstices of perhaps the Higgs field all the way up to waves of cosmic size. The most elementary particle would be finite, and by by way of Zeno would seem both somewhat divisible and more indivisible both by the low energy waves around it. Click here for Possible ways to measure and control matter waves with machines. While the wave of gravity is more fundamental than the particles in my causology, the subatomic particles are derived from the basic field. So if the derived shielding is from the basic field, gravity would shield a bit. Perhaps proof may be in eclipsing bodies of massive stars with other stars or heavenly bodies.

See also my Physics Synopsis page >Gravity Speed of, Boat and Ship Theory, and so on for why I think there is perhaps both a dense low speed Higgs component of the gravitation and a higher speed lower density component also.

If the Higgs particle gives (most) other particles mass by adhesion, in my causology it would be a sort of mediator between the foundation field (gravity) and the particles the Higgs gives mass to. It would be derived, not fundamental by another step from the main field. If it's so much like more usual higher power subatomic particles the Higgs would exert pressure and so have friction. Gravity has not much slowup with denser mass, so just the Higgs or a "ghost" motif offers no complete explanation for gravity. I asked a professor what the electron was made of, and she said, "sol fa". I said why did you say sol fa? She said, "I'm rehear-sing to go on Star Research!"

The Higgs may be a way to put weight on, like in string theory. Like string theory it may turn out to be only able to predict some of the subatomic numbers and events (String theory is a wave theory, and waves have been old science since the time of Newton. Since a wave and a particle aren't the same, string theory may be of worth more just for the low energy waves and not be of worth for high power physics except by addition of more properties like spin and charge by more conservation laws.).

Looking ahead to beyond and about the Higgs, it wouldn't put on infinite weight by its own implosion. The inflow of field would be almost the same amount of motion of it's outflow like more usual electric and magnetic fields. The Higgs' own field may flow in and add pressure like the usual fields (if it's a particle or antiparticle), causing the expansion out of it's magnetic or electric type field, and this may make the field react and flow out making the Higg's more solid, so the field stays finite. This is also how the Higgs, even if in the Standard Theory attractive like mass, exerts slight pressure to cause gravity and it's general equivalent, centrifugal force. Centrifugal force exercts pressure and it would seem to operate by way of outward expansion of the resilient ghost particles, gravity is much like centrifugal force, so it may have the same cause, the more dense Higgs type field. The numerous distinctions between gravity and inertia may be explained in my physics by the much lower energy gravitational field that's absent in the centrifuge but exists with gravity. For instance why can you turn off the "gravity" in an elevator far from the gravity just by stopping the rocket motors but not the gravity of the earth? And why can't gravity be reversed like when the rocket motors are in the opposite motion, so we would just fall up? (While the first of these problems may be disproof of Einstein's Equivalence of Gravity and inertia, since they are loosely the same both being made of motion, linear and angular, the second motif may generally not be disproof if inside a large wheel like in the circus the motion could be used to make you fall up. CLICK HERE. for more about this. As I say on the link either Einstein was wrong about the Equivalence of Mass and Inertia, or we find antigravity, either way we all win by improved physics.) The ghost particle's internal cohesion would make it solid so it could exert pressure. The Higgs would be solid, if it were just a fluid particle without pressure, gravity would be without the Ship and Field Theory.

.
Value Of The Higgs
.
The matter waves of subatomic physics, if made of Higgs particles may be of great value. In the Wikipedia site about teleportation, they say experience with the physics is showing no reason why this won't eventually be achieved. (For example, they recently moved the information of perhaps 10 million molecules and atoms a few feet). The force using the Bell Theorem is not a strong force so the Higgs could perhaps be used to make teleportation more robust via superdense lenses made of the Higg's to focus the ray. The Bell Theorem and the matter waves for teleportation may be aided more of worth if by strengthening the field by addition of density and combination of many of the Higgs well making the connection stronger or more high velocity, and so on, sending broadband information between the machines. (Evidence that much higher densities than found in usual subatomic physics are possible is in the mass densities of the center of high power masses like galaxies, higher than fusion. This density explains the power source of the cosmic jets of these masses. It's thought they are powered by gravity, but gravity only attracts, so a stronger expansion force must be present so energy is conserved and the matter won't disappear into the faster than light escape speeds massive bodies like BL Lacs or radio sources achieve.)
.
. The Higgs would make a good microscope and higher resolution could be achieved. Since gravity is without much shielding by the eclipses, if of controlled gravity the beam could have penetration with reduced interaction without the harm of such rays as X rays, so the Higgs may be of use in health science, or perhaps to take a census of all the world's people with just one machine.

A super small chip might be made of Higgs with wires of alternation of Higgs' in N S N S so the wire would be unified by the field. Gravity's high speed may have proof in the large symmetrical masses the cosmos has on both sides by the evidence now proven by the Wilkenson Observatory which I think may be connected by faster than light force since light can't reach this distance with connectivity by Einstein's "slow" speed of light (See my Physics Synopses GRAVITY, SPEED Of , and LIGHT , Speed of).

The much faster gravity wave must be interwound well with the Higgs or other elementary particle of this type because the moon and Earth transmit information about linear and angular momenta, with energy always conserved. The Higg's being of higher mass and shorter wavelength is more like electromagnetism. Electromagnetism in Special Relativity is all about the speed of light and linear high speed motion. This is my explanation of centrifugal force, the slower speed of light and the linear motion of the moon disconnects the moon and earth, with Einstein's slow speed of light and seperate points of space and time. Electromagnetism is about more expansion long range via linear motion, gravity is the opposite angular implosion. The gravity is of higher speed than the slower centrifugal force than light, or the moon would spin outward in it's orbit.

...
. If the Higgs by control of the field may be stacked in "blocks" or other shapes, another use of the Higgs may be super strong lightweight materials that would be like what I have named a hadron solid. Since each block would be more controlled by cancelling out the usual round shape of subatomic particles by stacking a few of the Higgs, say one in five to cancel some of the force with the N and S poles reversed in the Higgs making up the solid, even if super dense they wouldn't wrap around like in uranium in one large U238 so not as much risk of radioactivity or explosion of the solid with more continous control Higgs solids may allow if the usual hadron solid might.

Higgs solids may be feasable if made of the lower power Higgs that are in the vacuum. (Physicists think the vacuum is not empty. It's filled with gravitation and other low power particles like the Higgs, like induction, why it always takes about the same time to go one distance but not another, or what a rocket exaust presses against to move foreward, the Lamb shift of Hydrogen discovered in the 50's and other motifs like this lead many to believe all the cosmos is filled with low energy fields.) Since there are no negative low energy physics or gravity would repel, at this level of power the Higgs would have no antiparticle, so stacking them in blocks might be easier, they would be non exploding but solid at short range. The Higgs must have some internal structure if they exist, otherwise by adding mass which is attractive it would implode indefinitely and the vacuum would have infinite mass and gravity. So while gravity is always positive and the low power Higgs may have no antiparticle, it would have stability because of as much contraction as rebound of the Higgs to a definite point to explain the finite vacuum. But without an antiparticle it might be stackable to blocks without instability. So the Higgs of this type could or would allow another way to create a superdense super strong solid if the hadron solid would turn out to be unfeasable, if for example due to cost of production in machines if cash machines are no more out than we are in the wind if it's 20 outside and the wind is 79 mph, so fast it won't freeze and go clunk!

Centrifugal force in General Wave Dynamics, GWD would be a sort of gravity without motive power, both unified by the ghost particles to explain how inertia is so much like gravity, and with gravity powered by the additional low power field to explain the distinctions like how a starship's force inside can be cancelled by stopping the engine or upside down by reversing the boost, and not with gravity. If the Higgs causes both centrifugal force and gravity by way of pressure of more static particles and the force is aimed upward like when you are in a circus wheel, the gravity would be stopped at the zenith, and while the wheels would be in oscillation so they wouldn't whirl you around and around, the general result might be the same. Click here for more about this possibility

~GRAVITY WAVE MACHINES (TECH )~~

antigravity/gravity augumentation.

~~~~

PHYSICS LINKS

Physics Synopses

-

..

How To Solve a Sometimes Melancholy Dream ... All your beds are good beds I hope, but like a house fire science shows most people have a melancholy dream sometimes in their life. My experience shows that sad dreams say, once in a year* seem just about an unproved motif, and they didn't turn out to be so when you're up with the yawn. This motif of a simple melancholy dream is leverage to solve the motif using the power of humor when awake; To solve the dream, observe why it was impossible (based on the evidence) and make a wild association about it. The study of comedy about the most good motif of the REM is of value here, I recommend sites like AHA Comics.


If you dreamed you brought a saw to your job interview, you'll still be worth a lot in 20 years, why?

Solution; You couldn't have brought the saw because you weren't watching old songs where violins were, they don't saw it on the radio in the year 2000!

If you dream your village in the hills had a huge flood and you were up on the roof,

Solution; Thanks to global warming NOAA says it hasn't rained up here in a million years. No rain and if there was, why would it rain up, we're always near the salt of the earth even at our altitude!

This motif of finding the contradiction in the evidence, and making comedy out of it can also be used for bad ideas we all have somewhat, however it's of reduced (while still some) value with persons because it's sort of like using the evidence against the person, leaving them without as much of an out (not as efficient if you like a ship of friendship) so this I just use this for improving me and accentuate the positive with others by other motifs. An orthodontist is a person who disagrees with us but lets the conversation go on without discontinuation of the speech! See MY COMEDY MACHINE, and MY HUMOR CAUSOLOGY Part II in the Site Map at top of the site or on the Comedy Machine link for more.
.
Sonya Richards Olympic Runner is fiancee of a Pro football star. Atheletes run in most rich familys!
.
If you go to MA up in the Airwest or the Air higher up it would be best if they had camera zooms on the outside of your plane that you would don your virtual reality eyewear and see what it would be like as if you were in the afterlife up in the air when you look around, you would be of high elf esteam!

*If you have more sadness than a sad dream once in awhile, research shows you may have trouble learning about the good things in life, but you may be able to force your way back to the good side the best if you use good tricks like this. Doctor walking and doctor comedy are so you can be liked by nurse Goodbody for visits. If you're edgy a new patented derivative from nicotine (spelled sideways sort of) called cotanine may calm you with almost no toxicity and no risk of addiction like nicotine. Ask your doctor, lots of doctors and scientists and other professionals in the old days smoked because they said it made them think more clearly, and this has been proven about the brain chemical acytlcholine, involved in smoking, actually cotanine is so strong, it's used to stop smoking while losing weight while riding the white water, or whatever! I think cotanine may be used to help people be more financially secure in the new field of brain economics, by what else, using tricks like this to influence behaviour about business, this may be of major import to our lives in general. When in the MRI if they think the worth is lower when it's higher, we could find the herb or compound that makes investors win and the nation with this advantage might be richer is so, like melatonin was for sleep except for business. While Shaw believed that the great evil was to be impoverished, it may also be lack of wages or wherewithall!
..
..

GEOTHERMAL HEATING FOR SAFER ROADS

.
AND AS A SOURCE OF ELECTRIC POWER

The heat flow of the earth is being used to heat houses. The temperature 21 ft down say is always the same year round so with pipes below the house the earth is cooler than the heat of summer and warmer in winter. (In this weather it's so cold, I'm well shaven, the wind is so sharp, it cuts my beard right off! Or it's so cold, it freezes and falls off, this is when my breath goes clunk!) This is used to make the house indoors more like the constant temperature of the earth, so the temperature indoors is more constant year round, this is known as geothermal heating. A good use may be for electric power. Roads around the holidays are slick, and this makes Thanksgiving the most hazardous of any day about being on the road, your wife the chef loves her family and can always find the thyme! If there were geothermal wires parallel to the road below the top, the usual motif of geothermal power might be used via collectors of distinction in the top and foundation. This may be a use of electric heating and cooling, would be a big source of power for the power companys, and in winter it would see if ice and snow was on the road, and the power wires would rewire some of the year round electricity to short towers (short for camo like on superhighways, they might be built in with road signs). They say the towers would use some of the power from the wire and some from the geothermal source, more or less with power load, and availability of heat, how much was of value, and so on. Microwaves would be from each tower, and they wouldn't heat the air much, just the road. This is much like a microwave oven. The waves would just find the areas with ice and just heat these areas, so save power. Power would be generated year round, except for cooling parking lots in the heat, but for roads the summer power would be more profit for the financers of the road, because it would send out power to the companies most of the year, for just the addition of the main wire below the road and wires to the top that reach the heat when the road was built. It would cause no heat pollution because the source of the heat is the heat from the pressure of the earth, this will be a source of heat for billions of years. This may be power source for other types of machines, like trains with collectors of the downward weight that convert the pressure to electricity, this would then be used to aid the power of the train so it would be more like at 100% efficiency.
.

A NJ man was saved from a garbage truck.. when the man was searching for some returnable bottles and fell asleep. He called police from inside the truck and the police got there just in time, he was almost crunched, what a way to go! If he went to heaven, is this up where the hot dish orbits? They say about some perscriptions if even one person goes to the most afterlife the Heavenly Housecleaning Women have spiffed up, it's not unusual to not allow the sale or use of this perscription and goes to R and R. So if even one person is crunched like the man in the van, it may be good to put a sensor in the truck so when someone yells in the truck, the compactor would use a computer to save the occupant from reading other's Visas!
-

Einstein's Elevator III

-
A SECOND DISPROOF Of EINSTEIN'S EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE

. In his General Theory he says if you had a cosmic elevator and accelerated it in a distant field from gravity, no experiment would find any distinction between falling masses in the room inside the elevator far from massive fields, and an experiment in an elevator with falling masses and the gravity elevator not moving in a gravitational field. If both elevators have acceleration of 32 ft/sec and you drop different masses they would land on the floor of the elevator at the same moment so Einstein believed the earth's surface has equivalent motion relative to the different masses. Einstein thought if the earth's surface had millions of Saturn boosters lifting the earth's surface up to stop the masses that would reach the ground at the same moment, the field's relative motion is of most import and the masses have no import. The inertial elevator far from massive orbs was the proof of relativity (no not elevator tennis shoes without elevators!) and this same rate of fall was how inertia and gravity, the far and near fields, were the same. All accelerated frames of reference whether of gravity or the earth's field if, for example both are 32 feet, are exactly the same in Einstein's vision of the universe. The motion of different masses in the inertial elevator in motion far from gravity of this type was with both masses at rest relative to the field inside and outside the starship, with Einstein they were at rest in their rest frame and not in relative motion. Both masses in the gravitational elevator are also at rest in their rest frame and so feel no force in falling, as I say in Einstein's Elevator II. The tidal forces and just looking outside the elevator are already disproofs of Einstein's theory that no experiment disproves the relativity of gravity, and here is another,

If you have the two weights on the floor of both elevators, while the gravity of the earthbound elevator can be cancelled by moving in the frame of the acceleration downward, the distant elevator's field is cancelled by constant motion in it's rest frame. So gravity is cancelled by change but inertia is cancelled by other inertia or lack of change. Inertia and gravity are the opposite, they aren't equal or on the earth you would weigh the same in high or low latitudes.

The proof of the equivalence of inertial and gravitation of relativity was that different masses fall at the same rate in the earth's field. If you take two distinct masses and lift both to the same height, you have to use more force to lift the heavy mass than the light one, and when you drop them they fall at the same rate, the heavy mass releases just that much more energy as you put into it when you lift. If Einstein assumed the masses are the same it's disproven by how much force is exerted or released. In Einstein's Universe by Nigel Calder he asked, "Why does the law of inertia work horizontally where the greater mass with more resistance moves slower than the light mass with the same force, but not with masses in the usual 32 ft/sec when they fall?" Why would they fall at the same rate if dropped and move sidewise at another? You make the level masses move at the same speed by just using more force for the heavy mass than the light mass so they move at the same speed. And if two distinct masses are accelerated with the same force they move at different rates, and if you add more force they move at more unlike rates than this. I liken gravity to mass in general, and inertia to energy. Like the two different masses here in motion, if you have more mass, the linear motion is slower and if you have more inertia, or energy, the motion through the room or cosmos is faster. (The worth of a biz show is always higher than its cash value!) So mass accelerates in angular motion and energy is more constant in motion. If you have a heavy mass like the above with the equation F=ma it has more mass but less energy, and the light mass has more energy but less mass. For equal force they are distinguished and so mass and gravity and energy and inertia are not equivalent and by GWM (my own General Wave Physics) relativity of motion is disproven except in constant frames at the usual speed they're already at. Both mass and energy are no doubt made of motion because momentum is always conserved, and since energy is conserved and energy is measured mostly by motion, mass and energy are made of motion. Mass would be angular motion and energy linear motion because mass attracts to hold in such as a massive body like the earth from expansion, and energy being light like the light mass of F=ma would be linear.

Mass and energy are comparable to waves and particles, both are the most general distinction imaginable between what the world is made of, and so a causeology of one type is of worth to the other. Waves and particles aren't the same if both are impossible at the same place and time, and like E=mc2 they are unified if they are both made of motion. So waves and particles are both alike and not the same. Half the time Relativity is of value for constant speed waves of light, and half the time disproven for acceleration, like with my observation the elevators. The Famous E=mc2 holds well, you take the mass and it converts to the exact amount of atomic power. While mass and energy are both of motion of angular and linear momentum, one main advantage of my extension in GWM of Relativity would be in proof of where the extra mass of subatomic physics is from. If the protons and other subatomic motes spin at just the speed of light all the way from the lower power outer electromagnetic field in, the field is at the constant top speed of light of Einstein and so is with no more power available because by the above theory Relativity is about rest frames and not about acceleration because it describes the constant speed of light alone, not acceleration which Relativity either ignores in the well proven Special Relativity or fails to prove in the Equivalence Principle. The Rate of Mercury's fall changes with time and I think this is disproof of the Equivalence Principle due to the masses of the Equivalence Principle also falling at other than constant accelerations, and so too are all the other proofs of General Relativity if based on accelerations where the speed of light changes, not uniform motion where the speed of light is constant. I think all the "proofs" of General Relativity are proof of gravity and how it accelerates, and disproof of Einstein as much as gravity is considered.

.

To assume all masses fall at the same rate and the same height is already proof that they aren't the same. Just as in health, cause is of more import than just looks to be in control, and like force is more of import to make the masses unlike in lift and speed of fall than making the forces unlike to raise the heavy and light masses to the same height. If the same rate of fall is disproven and this was Einstein's main proof of gravity being relative, the shift of the perhelion of Mercury is or any change in the rate of fall is disproof of the Relativity of gravity. So faster than light motion of fields like gravity or the spin of the inside of heavy baryons or mesons is allowed in GWM.

One main use of faster than light motion of gravity may be for high speed communication, fast computer chips, or even faster than light travel, another is in inventions like the atomic motor. If massive subatomic particles like the proton spin faster than the speed of light inside (if mass is spin and the hadrons have more mass than electrons or other electric charges) more power via the flex of the field would perhaps be available than Einstein's causeology would imply. The higher mass density and thus faster than light spin in the field might be tapped by a beam like an electron beam that would go deep enough inside the field of the proton to cause a change of the beam's wavelength than otherwise by just the speed of light more mass more motion at faster than light inside the hadron. (If mass is spin and is always found in half integer units by the accelerators, the reason it's just half the speed of light would be because by relativity, the outside electric field of the particle when both spin in clockwise or anticlockwise motion is limited to the speed of light. The two opposite motions of the field nearest to both spins are in opposite motion so the longer distance field is here at the speed of light via Special Relativity's lower energy/speed of light limit, this is the highest speed the outside field can go so the maximum speed of particle spin is just one half the speed of light and this limits all the spins to half the speed of light except at near radii to the proton.) The spin inside the hadron may be faster than light because if mass is spinning energy with momentum conserved, and all the particles are found with just units of half integer spin, all would have the same mass. Either mass is not spinning energy which would disprove conservation of linear and angular momentum, or just the outside of particles would spin at the maximum speed of light, and the inside would spin at higher speed. I hold that all mass would spin at with the limit of the spin of the clockwise and counterclockwise spin of the field at most at the speed of light if all was in units of E=mc2 where the speed of light is well involved instead of its more general equivalent form F=ma, allowing other speeds both slower and faster than light (if mass is small, the acceleration is any speed including faster than light by gravity's lower density than the electric field). This is why the older explanation is much more in use yet to describe most motion, because it's more general and so Relativity and all the rest of physics may be derived from Sir Issac's gravitation by way of Maxwell's use of fluid resilience of the field based on more usual physics he used to predict the exact speed of light. In F=ma if the mass density (intrinsic strength) were approaching 0 the acceleration, a approaches infinite speed, and isn't held constant by the speed of light. Maxwell based the prediction of the speed of light on the resilience of the field where the mass density is a self attraction, for reduced density of the linear motion of gravity, for gravity the predicted speed is much higher, and for its opposite increase of density for subatomic physics, with an acceleration also the opposite, and two minuses of acceleration and higher density making a plus, with considerably higher density in subatomic physics, the speed of spin could be considerably higher than the speed of light in my generalization of Maxwell's physics via GWM.

Since the speed of light is constant and Maxwell based his prediction of it on the density of the field created by constant electric charges, if the charges had any sort of instability "like radioactivity" this (indeed all acceleration) would be disproof of relativity. Using the assumption of internal faster that light spin of heavier particles than electrons, the rates of radioactivity can be predicted, based on the higher and higher speed spins having more centrifugal force, causing the decay at higher rates. This idea of the field flexing and moving at faster than light to have radioactive events is not allowed by Einstein, and this simple extension of Maxwell's proof of the speed of light may predict the half lives well.

EXERCISE WITHOUT VIVARIN

What would save a mars visitor if he or she was in the space suit and fell down? How about airbags on arms, chest and back, or just an airbag on a track that would roll below the visitor, and boom, he's lifted up, leveled on the other side! On Mars you weigh I think 40 pounds and if the blast were big the visitor may reach the lift of Venus! Or a computerized machine may aid the space suit if Venus is expecting and it's her maternity. Another way to achieve this that's been devised is via gyroscopes to both store energy for like heating and life support, and they also would keep the wearer from falling over much like the use of gyroscopes they have devised to make it so a bicycle is more safe.


MORE ABOUT THE ATOMIC MOTOR And RFGM

A good use of combining the atomic motor and the Reciprocating Force Generating Machines (RFM) that have been invented would be for a fast Mars rover. An atomic power source like the motor would power small or big centrifigal force lifting devices like the RFM. (Or other machines of similar type that uses just the top of the wheel generating the upward lift by being just a reciprocating slice of the wheel, so the rest of the centrifugal force is not stopping it). Perhaps a small Focus Fusion machine of the type Lerner is building may be a good power source, but my atomic motor would be low temperature so not need shielding and may be cheaper to build in a few months. The rover would lift in the field, like the moon is held up against the earth's gravity by its centrifugal force, but with more acceleration, power to lift and accelerate the rover to high speeds by turning the uncancelled spin of the wheel at the right angle and so on, and because it's of low weight. This would be a rover that would go anywhere on Mars or other planets fast and if it were wired to TV links and robot arms, or other such tools, it would have much more dexterity than usual rovers and ablity to lift and transport large weights. So it would be of real value to roam the globe and much reduction of weight/power ratio, it would be much cheap to send these robots more distances than chips have bytes. Both the atomic motor and the RFM are not yet prototypes but with possible uses like this, and possible combinations in almost any type of machine they may be worth research.

"About Benjamin Franklin, the good thing about him was, he never disagreed with anyone." And two out of three of the English surveyed in 1777 said, He wasn't in dispute with the English about army life, he was just positive a lot about war! They wish he just wouldn't decide who he was in support of!

What's sleepwalking for sleeplearners? When you walk in the room where the bed is! I see these ads for rugs that they say improve the look of your room, my rooms must wear power lense opthomology!

What does a movie goddess say when she talks in her sleep? She says YAWN! YAWN! STRETCH! AHHHH!

.Bell, of Bell telephone tried to sell the rights to the telephone for 100,000 to W Union and a year later they would have been rich just to make the same purchase for 25 million, and Bell said What if Anjela Scott owns 2 answering machines with 27 rooms!

A Comprehensive General Explanation of Behaviour..

...HOW GENIUS, MENTAL ILLNESS, RETARDATION, And Other GENERAL Types of BEHAVIOUR MAY BE EXPLAINED By ONE UNIFIED CAUSOLOGY, GBN, GENERAL BEHAVIOURAL NEUROLOGY

What do genius, retardation, depression, and schitzophrenia have in common (or not so uncommon?). It's been said that genius is just lots of common sense, indeed we have the same exact neurons as a feline, just more. New research about creativity finds it's often not a sudden burst of inspiration, rather it's many smaller innovations building up to the brilliance. In this view, "Einstien was both a real good proof reader (a good author too of 200 books) and also he happened to be at the right time and place in the cosmos. There have been diffferent visions of genius, one is it's something completely unlike other truth. After all in Einstein's 1905 page about relativity, he uses not a single reference to any other author. But Einstein said also, the secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. And he would have known, right? How would he hide the cosmos? Thus, some think of genius as just a sort of high level common sense.

The two things common to all intelligence are memory and creativity, like the branches and trunk of a tree, and like the logic branches of a computer. This is rather like for example, the branches of math as they have developed, simple to complex, like evolution as it has developed. Indeed this would be why our wit has been so important in history, it mirrors evolution in a direct sort of way. If you think of wealth as being one of the higher realms of civilization or an expression of the power of knowledge is power like money, if in doubt, a reliable definition of wealth might be that the rich can buy more of what's natural!

 A neuron is like the tree, and this is why I think genius, retardation, mental illness and normal intelligence all may have a simple underlying physiology. Genius is the tree or the neurons (or the equivalent synapses, also  that have the branch and trunk in smaller realms, like the math tree getting more complex with details in history of math) with more branches like creativity, and more trunk. Genius is sometimes called "supernormal". In GBN, normal intelligence would be the same tree with moderate branches and trunk, and retardation is with branches and trunk reduced more yet than normal. If there may be real hope of someday curing retardation, and indeed of increasing "normal geniuses" like you and me, well right! We may soon be able to grow neurons well, as I say below, this may be why Electro Convulsive Therapy ECT is the best method known to relieve depression, by growing the neurons at the base of the brain, the hippocampus, or perhaps by trimming the overbranches at the top, soon to be proven or disproven by MRI. Depression may have important cause in the branches being more top heavy and complex with reduced trunk of the tree. Schitzophrenia is "fast" and depression is "slow" so it seems natural to believe, they are the "opposite". Depression would have too many connections at the top and not enough at the bottom, schitzophrenia would be the tree upside down. As I say, the base of the tree or trunk may be more important to most types of behaviour than anywhere else, it evolved first, and more branches like a top heavy tree can still function relatively well, but a tree with reduced branches and a damaged or unadapted trunk as in schitzophrenia would have reduced ability to process energy or computational energy like thought, and this could be why schitzophrenia tends to be more severe than depression. the branches are complex and redundant, while the truck of the tree is simple and not so redundant, thus it's not only more important because without a trunk the tree can't compete as well, but also simple ways can damage it more all else the same.

  As I say the base of the brain may be the most important to such as intelligence, curing depression or schitzophrenia, and so on because it's the general area from which all or much else may follow. This reminds me of way cool ice age research, what else? Around 1900 it was found after some years of puzzling that the earth isn't symmetrical about the times of the glacial ages. The N controls the glacial ages more than the S. If otherwise, the N would be hot and the s cool with no change or glacial ages. Only if the N is more powerful is there the glacial age we've been hoping for in the heat of global warming. The trunk and branches of the brain, the neuron or logic don't have to be perfectly symmetrical, any more than men and women, or bad and better. This is how the foundation may be so important to curing depression and schitziphrenia, and improving retardation, normal intelligence, and perhaps even you too if you are reading this, Mr Einstein!

 GBN may even explain manic depression, as a flux in neurotransmitters reversing the branching of the small zones (Notice it's not the overall neurons that are reversed or upside down with each cycle. This is evidence that the neurotransmitters themselves not just the overall trunk and branches of the neurons are involved with the cause of thought. Though this certainly doesn't limit the possibility that the small scale branching and trunk structure of the neurotransmitters and synapes themselves are the foundation, this is indeed a necessity of GBN if the structure of all logic is like this. Consider Noether's theorem. Essentially, Noether, the great lady mathematician Einstein admired most found that the more things change, the more they stay the same, this leads to the classification of all sets indeed, all there is by way of either what changes-or what stays the same! If we imagine a simple cosmos all as one, nothing could change, so nothing would be "real". Or in a cosmos not of the one but the many, with small random unconnected events alone, there would be nothing to know either, so all there is must have both; the changes and the sameness, the trunk and branches, leading to all there is. This seems to be why symmetries are so important to the foundation of physics.)

The evidence with MRI shows that the two regions of your brain that multiply in size with learning are the higher brain and the hippocampus. There is definite proof of the increase in size of the hippocampus with learning. Elizabeth Gould thought that the higher brain would also increase in mass via learning. For more about the hippocampus go to neurogenesis, and about the cortex click here. In schizophrenia the hippocampus which is much involved in memory has random orientation of cells. In most persons the orientation is with the hippocampus cells more aligned. The main symptom of the illness is that memory is too much, the person with schizophrenia remembers just a few words and others less than other people.

While the hippocampus is about memory, it's believed that memory also is caused by other parts of the brain. In brain research a person named H. M. had an operation in the 50's for epilepsy and by accident of the surgeon his hippocampus was hurt so they thought he would have amnesia, but he remembered after this so it's thought memory is stored in many parts of the brain and that we create our memories by exercises of our brain. Generally I think if just the hippocampus and higher brain are multiplied with learning, these would be most important, the high and low notes. The hippocampus is about memory and memory experts say memory is by association, so the memory of people without schizophrenia would be by change of regular links, links are strong with unity, like a chain, if any link is incomplete it's not as strong. So evolution would favor this unity of the cells for survival, memory is important to know the land well year after year. If you think of memory as the opposite of creativity with memory made of regular nonrandom more convergent links and creativity has a major element of more randomness, in a healthy person you have two major parts of the brain, one naturally unified like the hippocampus, and the other random like the higher learning, or the trunk and branches of a tree. In schizophrenia the person may have too much or "wrong" memory of wrong words, and if memory and creativity are opposite, somewhere else perhaps in the higher brain you would have too much non randomness where there would be creativity or randomness in most healthy persons. The usual regular links of memory in the hippocampus would be random in the hippocampus, and the memories of the usual type would be actually in the other "opposite" part of the brain. So schizophrenia would be a sort of reflex arc in reverse, random creativity is where memory would usually be in most people as in the hippocampus, and creativity being the reverse is where memory would be. Being mostly opposite they can't both be in the same place at the same time. If the hippocampus of memory is random where it would be unified, somewhere else of comparable import in the brain involved more with random alignment by this theory would be unified. Since the two main parts of the brain that are larger with learning are the hippocampus and the front of the brain, and the hippocampus has randomness, perhaps the higher brain would have unity for the people involved more than usual. This is a prediction of this "branch"of my explanation, if as above mostly the hippocampus is most important to memory, and the upper cerebrum being more about the higher creativity. There may be interaction between the more active and other brain realms for learning, H.M. remembered events after the operation for epilepsy, but evolution may favor simplicity, for instance they've found a few cells that control the activities of most of the brain like a boss. Simplicity is stronger when in doubt, why buy it with 50 when you can buy it without or with what?

--

GENIUS A BRANCH

-

If this is a reversed reflex arc of the lower and higher brain, genius would be supernormal, with both more of memory and creativity, just more of the reflex arc. So a prediction of the GBN is that geniuses have more aligned cells of the lower brain and more random of the higher, and since the brain physically rewires it's neurons on at the synapses when learning, the use of neurotransmitters in genius would be more efficient. And there would be more neurotransmitters here too.

~~~

-

RETARDATION, A REDUCED BRANCH?

 

Retardation is more passive than the reversed reflex arc of schizophrenia, retarded persons report no major pain in how they feel about life, so those with retardation would have the reflex arc of normal intelligence, but with reduced randomness of the higher brain and reduced unity of the hippocampus, but not so much the arc was reversed like in schizophrenia, just a reduction in intensity.

-

-

Depression and The Evolution of The Brain
...

 Depression would be explained in GBN as a sort of too extreme genius, at least where the branches of the tree is involved. The trunk would be decreased but the higher brain activity would be increased to the degree of the symptoms. They have with MRI found in both depression and schizophrenia that the hippocampus and higher thought realms of the brain are reduced in size this would be because like iron in circulation too much or too little activity may have much the same result, for iron the result is fatigue, and for neurological activity in the brain the result would be reduction of the brain volume.

It recently was found by MRI that while depression has both reduced grey matter and volume of the hippocampus there is also increased connectivity of neurons above the left eye, an area called the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC). This area turns off and on rapidly in severe depression but not in normal brains. This shows that  the general volume of volume brain tissue may not directly be a prediction of GBN, rather just the degree of connectivity and firing rate of the neurons and synapses. With GBN even with reduced hippocampus volume and the essence (and then perhaps the resolution) of the problem these fewer cells may be much more active.

--

 If schizophrenia has random cells in the hippocampus and would have more nonrandom cells of the higher brain, depression would have the general pattern of schizophrenia but reversed with more unity of the cells of the hippocampus and randomness of the cells of the higher thought, the same as genius, but unlike in genius with not enough trunk to support the branching out. In schizophrenia and depression, both the hippocampus and higher learning brain areas are found in tomography to be atrophied. In GBN, with the more basic trunk of the tree damaged in depression by too much simplicity, the higher branches of the leaves above are without as much available power from the light.


 They find that the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and other brain areas are much changed by Electroconvulsive (ECT) therapy. This is still the best known way to improve depression, outperforming therapy and pharmaceuticals, with 75% improved. (The older problems of flailing and some memory loss for those having ECT have been improved by ansthesia and muscle relaxants, and memory now actually improves by short sharp pulses in modern ECT. More recently, depressed people have emerged from the MRI laughing and joking, and it's believed an area between the hippocampus and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex called area 25 may control the depression circuit. Many believe that in the future depression may be cured as now is being achieved. About 50% of those with improved MRI treatments are cured though still costing several thousand dollars. The price may be soon lower, like Roll Back America to the hours ahead for millions.) 

  In tomography It's been found the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is "overconnected" and that ECT reduces the connections yet without reducing grey matter with the hippocampus increasing in size with ECT, just as GBN predicts. The trunk is getting stronger and the branches are reduced. Theorists are also using MRI to find out if overexcitation or much connection of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is indeed the "cause" of depression. Since symptoms of depression also sometimes gradually return after ECT they are waiting to see if the symptoms are much the same as goeswith changes in the leftdorsolateral prefrontal cortex. GBN is about the hippocampus, the base of the brain more than all else, as I say. So I wonder if the changes expected instead will be more directly proportional to changes there. Depression has been found to have endorphin levels much like other normal people. It may seem that endorphins aren't involved, and schizophrenia with higher endorphins isn't really the opposite of lower speed depression, and the tree isn't "upside down" here. Schizophrenia is more severe than depression so I believe there is the upside downness involved here, but an overbranched tree with reduced trunk can generally function better than a tree with too much trunk and reduced branches both. Thus though depression is "half a reflex arc", with much trunk but reduced branching schizophrenia would have neither branches or trunk in good health. 

 If the trunk is more important, the atrophy of the trunk in depression would have reduced endorphins there and too many endorphins in the  left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, even though the overall levels of endorphins are not changed a lot compared to normal people. But schizophrenia being more severe and the opposite of depression too, might have reduced endorphins in the cortex but much increased endorphins in the hippocampus, not being also exactly the same as depression in general. This is where all the extra endorphins of schizophrenia could be from, because the hippocampus is more important for the general area a person is in, and how good they feel in general, and so on.

   I think it's possible the changes in the brain seen with ECT and then MRI may be showing not a lot of changes in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and more in the hippocampus, this would be because the hippocampus is more important and reflexes like muscles and systems in the body come in pairs. For each reflexor there's an extensor, If your kidneys are damaged, your heart has to pump more, this is why we aren't infinite, yet! As I say depression has one important link with genius, the branching of the top of the tree, genius has both branching and trunk in GBN, depression has branching more. It also seems a simple change of radiation like ECT could both energise and build up the hippocampus well, yet at the same time trimming the top of the branches just right "enough" to improve the tree in general. It would seem one or the other with something "simple" like ECT. By GBN the hippocampus is more important and the flexor being restore could help with the behavioural reflexes to thus improve those who have ECT. The relative change in the hippocampus and the leftdorsolateral prefrontal cortex would allow the more complete reflex arc to relieve the depression, suddenly the depressed person feels more like a genius. So too if the branches were removed there would be an overall change in the grey matter with ECT, and this wasn't seen. GBN also says that depression and schitzophrenia, as well as improvements in intelligence, of normal people, geniuses and for mental retardation may all be improved by methods to boost the brain here. GBN predicts that retarded people will have less endorphins, though they may be improved and that in manic depression the endorphins will wax and wane between the levels of schizophrenia and the more proasic levels of depression.

 The explanation of why depression has more activity of the higher brain and yet depression has general slower metabolism would be that while the branches of a tree are important, the trunk, the hippocampus, may be the main source of both depression and schizophrenia. (The brain pacemakers they use to relieve severe depression by stimulation of the higher brain nearer the right side may not be disproof the area above the right eye is not also involved, because it's more sped up as GBN predicts. The brain is more complex than a simple causology and so the pacemakers may operate by some other circuit of the brain.) When the hippocampus is restored to healthy size by herbs or prescriptions or other therapies like exercise, the sadness and other symptoms of depression are often relieved. The hippocampus would be of more import to the general speed of activities and determination of symptoms or genius and so on than the higher brain. The hippocampus is more basic and evolved before the higher brain, so information from the body would have to be relayed through the trunk of the tree, obviously the trunk of a tree has much to do with the tree's well being, it's the whole general area the tree is in.

 -

The idea that schizophrenia and depression are two opposite forms of the same illness may be related to endorphins, the bodies natural pain relievers.

 It's established that endorphin molecules are too large to go from the blood to the brain yet endorphin depletion takes place when the brain doesn't make enough endorphins fast enough to replace the endorphins depleted by stress, and so on. This is evidence the endorphins are influencing the system and the brain and how endorphin dialysis with schitzophrenia is so effective for removing the symptoms. Click here for a site about this.

In research the symptoms of schizophrenia are relieved for a few days when blood dialysis removes the endorphins. Endorphins are 10 to 100 times as much in the circulatory system of persons with schizophrenia, and beta endorphins are sometimes even found to cure schizophrenia. So if schizophrenia is a reversal of depression, perhaps depression would have an endorphin deficit. This site says "The evidence is inconclusive." but obviously some important major reversal because of the higher and lower speed of general activity (heart rate, breathing, sleeping or somnolence, get.) involved in these two types of illness. It's possible a simple and strong link between them exists like this. With the cerebral cortex active in severe depression, this may be the source of the raised endorphins found in some research. In depression this would perhaps be like the branches of the tree in evolution trying to make up for the trunks atrophy by hoping to make better use of the light above by branching out and being more active. While this would be the source of the raised endorphins in general circulation, if the hippocampus is of more import to be in the general area evolution would favor, in depression GBN would seem to have a deficit of endorphins in the hippocampus itself for some reason, for example if the cells were too unified, the opposite of schizophrenia, this could make the hippocampus unable to use the endorphins well, so there would be either a lack of endorphins in the hippocampus or something like lack of uptake. The overall endorphin levels would be the result of the combination of both higher levels of the cortex and lower levels of the basic realms of the brain, one subtracts and the other increases more.

..

While depression in GBN may be caused by the more basic realms of the brain slowed down and the higher brain hyperactive somewhat and schizophrenia would have this reversed, both could have higher levels of endorphins (in either the LDLPFC or the hippocampus, respectively) than others without these illnesses, because in depression the higher brain and in schizophrenia the base of the brain are both overactive, respectively. Depression in GBN would only have moderately more endorphins because while the hippocampus has less activity than in other individuals without depression the cortex is a lot more more active in depression. Schizophrenia would have more endorphins in general than depression because of the more active general area of the brain the hippocampus and because this realm is more important.

-

A prediction of this is that severe depression might be improved by either stimulation of the hippocampus (which would be too slowed down) or by a pacemaker that would slow down the activity above the left eye in the cortex not just by stimulation of the left cortex with pacemakers now being researched, this type of pacemaker used above the right eye might be more efficient because it could fit in more with the causology so more efficient and so smaller and thus safer.  The over activity above the left eye in severe depression would seem to be cancelled out by more of the activity that the brain pacemaker achieves by stimulation of other realms of the higher brain, thus the MRI may not produce the cheer in place of depression because both effects of the MRI on the cortex would cancel out, on the other hand if the MRI works mostly by heating it seems plausible it could heat and energise the more slowed down hippocampus, and would have the cheering boost because the hippocampus is the most important, this is worth research, it would be more proof of GBN.

..

 Recent advances involve a vaccine for mice cocaine users (little mice hats) and also for heroin, the users stopped using them completely with no strain. Thus I believe schitzophrenia being so much about the endorphins might be cured or controlled much cheaper and with higher safety by this method. If a reliable method of moderating the endorphins was achieved, as with dialysis of endorphins and the method has a built in governor of some type to keep the endorphins from going too low, this might offer real, or even permanent cheap relief for the millions who suffer from it. (Actually the right dose is used according to the anticipated use of the drug to solve). AND it also may bring more pleasure in living to millions more with elevated endorphins.

....

Fluctuations of the endorphins in the hippocampus in this general explanation could be the cause of manic depression. That the strong fluctuations occur is evidence that the endorphins may be of more import than even the physical branching of the neurons (though the branching is important also no doubt) because it's improbable the general rewiring of neurons would physically realign with each cycle of more or reduced endorphins or the other neurotransmitters involved. This also explains why drugs control but don't cure schizophrenia. The physical branching or non branching of neurons is hardware, and the endorphins are more like software. It's more easy to move software around the web than to move a sofa! This may be of use in curing mental illness eventually by finding ways to actually rearrange the cells of the brain for more optimum pleasure in life.

 The autistic savant syndrome would also be explained by the branching out but more rapid boost of the way to reach the light. Generally while in research they say someone who was retarded or was impaired in brain function some other way would have both the branches and the trunk impaired, the trunk would be of more general import. In retardation the branches and trunk of the higher and lower brain would be of less branching out than the brains of other persons. As in research, they find the genius part of the thought of autistic savants would be more about memory, because the trunk would be of most import to build up the most to reach the light the soonest if in doubt. A tree in the forest with other trees has reduced light (opportunities for growth and self improvement, and so on) if it can't branch out or has a low trunk. The improvement the tree would try to make would be a strong one. Shakespeare said, "Strong reasons make strong actions", so the cause of the genius realm of the impaired person's thought would be because almost any individual knows if they're being stopped at a green go light in the competition. If the tree is near the forest floor without much light, just branching out without much light is not maximal. The most optimal wager would be to build up the trunk ("memory") as fast as possible and make it strong to reach the light room up in the roof, before the light is out of reach, branching out is when or if this is achieved, not before. "You earn the right to do things the way you want to do them" (Thank you Reeba.) As the Wikipedia site says the genius of these savants is often about memory more than with most persons. And if the hippocampus is of much import as is known about memory and this is the trunk of the herb in GBN, the hippocampus without as much creativity would be the main source of the power of these persons to be smart. So GBN explains why memory is of import here. The hippocampus is involved with new memories, and so for all learning of most import because it puts the person in the right general area, without which it's much tougher to achieve evolution's aid.
-
The hippocampus of autistic savants like the fast tree trunk to reach the light in time may be much in use to do their best to survive, and the hippocampus is important to memory, and memory is about reliable regular links (ask any web historian, and you'll see why I say this!). In schizophrenia the memory is "bad" memory, because it's not of highest aid to their survival, and the genius of autistic savants would be "good" memory of more use to evolution. Since in schizophrenia the hippocampus cells are more randomly oriented as research has it and good memory is a strong regular link like a strong trunk of a tree, a prediction of GBN is that while autistic savants may be lacking in creativity and higher branches at in the forest of life, they may have more regular orientation of the cells of their hippocampus, better use of endorphins and other compounds there, and so on. While in this theory the higher branches in general of learning of autistic savants would be lower than a genius' or normal person's level, as depression could have branches more like geniuslike the savants would have a hippocampus more like a genius at least about the genius part of the hippocampus they would use to multiply their power. A tree in the forest always needs some light, and for the reason of evolution favoring the person's survival they would want to make their trunk reach the light fast, and if the branch was mostly with risk of no light, evolution would understandably want to make most use of the precious light where available so the front of the brain of these persons may be of reduced branching due to lack of usual thought activity, a literal lack of light. But some of the branches of the higher brain in autism may be more branched out, make it to the light, and knowing evolution, the autistic savant's survival is often by evolution's design with much use of the light for this, this being the source of the ingenius light of that person's gift. Essentially in an abstract way, "where the patch of light in the roof of the forest" was, when the branch branched out, there the light would be more developed in that part of the higher brain, in proportion to their gift, like the more typical genius of myth and math. This also explains why savants of this type are rarely artists, this would be because art is about light and vision, and the best move of savants whose learning is more like a tree without the light, often don't therefore have the option of being so visual. While there are exceptions, words are linear like the trunk of the branch, and visual thought is more nonlinear. Visual creativity is more a feel good event, but dire necessity of the stress of savants of this type may favor the most important truth of the shortest path to reach the light before anything else. The "world awaits our creativity as soon as our debts are paid", ect. Memory is the buildup of fast strong links, like the truck of the branch, so random creativity like visual genuis must be delayed till the branch can first find more light. This could be why retarded savants are often  geniuses in math, music, ect. and less in visual creativity. 

-.Memories are constantly being formed and to the suprise of brain researchers, memories are stored in the whole brain, not just locally (say in Ohio!) They used to say we just use some of our brain, but this myth has been disproven, and we actually use perhaps 97% it. In brain research they find evolution is always smarter than we are. The increase in size of the hippocampus with learning may just be the most obvious change in the brain that takes place in more subtle ways at the synapses in other parts of the brain. For many types of brain science or physiology mere measure of general brain volume may be of no more real depth than brain waves were when it was found they only give the most general information about the brain.

GBN would hold to the molecular level, because all computation is a reflex arc, so the synapses would be just a sort of neuron of small size, and so much the same as the brain in general but with sharper resolution. The hippocampus and higher brain would be just a big reflex arc, trunk to branches and if you're able to exercise a muscle in moderation it has more power, so with genius the brain is multiplied.
-.

How Depression Relief Might Also Be Achieved For Those Not Cured Via MRI and Combinatorial Chemistry.

......More about use of vaccines for perhaps curing depression schitzophrenia, and improving many other health situations involving too much of a given compound in circulation, (Wilson's, heart problems, ect.)