COLD FUSION

NOT RULED OUT COMPLETELY, BUT WHY NO RADIATION FROM USUAL MASS OR STARS?

Cold Fusion was where in the late 80's they supposedly found in an off the shelf lab experiment that power of the level of fusion was produced. It was claimed to be wrong by the watchdogs but the power station on the FM many listened to up the road where I used to live was alright! Sort of like Solid Gold bees. With the possibility of a huge power output even so and more deliberation the Department of Energy is reconsidering the experiments. Some say it's impossible. I think this might be possible like the elements in chemistry, even with good cyber paper (at 10,000 anyhow for just a wrist band e paper has a rich price) chemists can't predict which element will be solid or otherwise just from atomic chemistry. For example while we know the orbits of charges forming the compounds of the two sources of hydrogen and oxygen will combine to form water, this can't be proven by any straightforward calculation. Just the orbits of stars and moons zoom in simple ways, not the orbits of the electrons it would seem. It would be possible because the protons being made of subparticles are comparable in complexity with the orbits and spins of the electrons that make up the atomic elements. The promoter of cold fusion, Meyer, says he uses a "catalyst" to power the fusion, and won't say what it is, which makes a lot of people suspect Meyer of just inventing the physics of Cold Fusion for profit. (The three maji who were with gold Frankencense or Myrth are at rest in Miami Beach in Jan). If the catalyst exists, it must be made of either baryons, mesons, or leptons, these being the only ways mass exists in physics. It's probably not made of leptons because there are leptons all around like light, and no huge energy is being released from the earth by their action. It might seem the light would be energised and this could be the catalyst but light at higher power behaves like the meson or bayron, so this leaves just mesons, the middle weight motes of subatomic physics, and the baryons, the heavyweights. All world heros of the WWF are non light heavyweights, thanks to physics fans like Meadow Williams who make an x or y via math! Of all the heavy particles of subatomic physics, only the proton is stable for enough time for the reactions Meyer claims. Proton metabolites could be what would be the catylist so the catalyst would seem to be made of protons and metabolites or some combination of protons, proton metabolites and leptons, since they are the only stable particles of subatomic physics. But these are usual particles, and they exist in all stars, so we would expect to see more power from the stars as physics "tries out" all the combinations to make the catalyst and most important, the spectra would be much changed. (When the stars like Suzanne Summer wave, her wrist radio is at the speed of light!) Unusual spectral lines are seen of higher power sources like jets of massive radio stars, but there is too much energy here to be explained by just fusion. While science can't yet see below distances of 10 -15th cm with the accelerators and the possibility of cold fusion is thus allowed in massive stars or other higher energy sources, the level of power as Meyer claims for his experiments are about the same level of power as usual fusion. The stars are on the same energy level so I think the same disproof of Cold Fusion (about the spectral lines of most stars being not much unusual) would hold. And needless to say just because something is possible in subatomic physics isn't always proof it's so.

Update about relativity and cold fusion 1-08.

My opthamologist in 1997, I loved her big brown eyes of blue and .bizcom!

They arrested 37 at bingo where I live this month. The horses swore moms were winners above 55 mph!
-
.