Was Maxwell More Awake Than Einstein 1n 1857?

Einstein admired Maxwell more than any other physicist about Relativity, he copied Maxwell the most.


If we take a pump and remove the air, sound stops yet the light whizzes right through the empty bottle. It's been said there is no evidence for waving medium, but if we have a small rocket ship inside the bottle, or a larger ship in the cosmos, it exerts force on the field as it moves forward, both from the exhaust and the force resisting the motion forward, to me this seems evidence there is the low energy field the wave is waving. For any change in momentum between the ship and the universe it seem reasonable there would be a force felt by the medium. If there were no change in the field there would be no change felt. If there was nothing there, there could be no change. Another reason I believe in this medium is because of Aristotle's reasoning, a truly empty space is impossible since it would allow travel at infinite velocity. We can have any density we may like as Maxwell used to predict the speed of light, but zero density is improbable.

 Changes of the pressure via speed could explain how mass is invariant yet we can change the weight by being nearer or farther from gravity.

 Click here about my solution to questions about what may be the probable density of the medium Maxwell used.

Click Here for My Solutions to time Reversal, Why Is this Not a Disproof of Faster Than light?

 My general method a hopeful generalization of Maxwell's idea is that different density may allow for different speeds, not just of light but of FTL gravity and the strong force too, General wave Dynamics GWD. Here's My GWD Synopsis, or Click link at The Bottom after you read this post. SR is a local loop of the field. Perhaps if we assume that we are trying to prove in a more general GWD and then search where we might find it, the loop is not complete.

 If the medium exists between electric charges as Maxwell believed the empty space time is replaced in GWD with the low energy field. If all is made of matter and gravity attracts and compresses to make the other mass since if there were no gravity the non gravity forces would have long since fizzled to 0 density by positive entropy and if the field is empty, perhaps all there is is made of nothing by relativity.

 By the above, the medium seems to exist and this explains where the extra physics are from as a starsailor nears the speed of light, more pressure higher mass.


 Maxwell used the constant electric charges to arrive at the speed of light, if there were a bit more or reduced positive charge the speed of light would have changed according to the density of the light. Assuming what is proven here is to say we can't ever go FTL not because the light isn't fluid, rather because the charges are constant and the light is well founded. This would be why SR is a real loop, there are a large number of charges, and they never seem to change. No change here, and SR wins, except as I say SR seems lacking in horse sense..

 The quanta are real important, because my First Principle is Field Preservation, there had to be one! If the foundation gravity wasn't more implosive than reradiant where would we be? It has to hold well or the zero density of heat flowing from hot to cold without Preservation would not allow us what we love, a hug by Mother Earth. The Second Principle is that they can't implode to 0 or we couldn't be here. Einstein could have realized this and not changed his belief about super massive fields, they don't implode to 0 instead they put out huge jets often. I believe this may be because of a fifth and sixth reaction force inside these events not a singularity, violating energy conservation. In GWD they spin at FTL so the can stand up to the FTL inward flow of the field, perhaps a good reason here to believe in FTL too. Only if they spin at FTL would this seem possible. (The particles of these forces would fizzle out to usual particles outside the jets because only under the super pressure of the massive bodies would they not fizz out. This would be why we see none of these heavy particles around us in the Solar System or the Earth.)

 Quanta are the balancing point where the implosion start to reradiate, answering Einstein's ancient greek question, why does the electron have the charge and mass it does? Why not my being so rich I read the yellow pages and in the shade?

 SR has won so well as far as it has because there has to be both implosion and reradiance and they have to balance somewhere near! Even so quanta are an emergent way of quantum physics, they can't be nailed down, the absolute quanta couldn't change and these is no seperating the waves from the quanta, we can't say where are the quanta because the waves around them are indefinite, there is no where the quanta are definite. All the parameters and dependant variables, only the Higgs' is external.

 If the quanta aren't absolute, it becomes possible SR isn't absolute, and if the feild is rather like a field of the atmosphere or water, our machines may allow improvement with.

 If we have an ocean the cosmic ocean or life's a beach, say and we send a torpedo through it the fluid will react and make it add mass like in SR. If all the rockets are the same and the density of the wave is too, some might say, this is an absolute wall, no faster to go is ever seen since the force of the wall is always more than the small force of the rocket. This arises from the assumption of the medium.

The area of the torpedo is important to the infinite mass of the wave, if each torpedo has a limited area, this doesn't mean it would always be so. A larger torpedo would need more force to move at higher speed, and this is just why a heavy mass usually weighs more and I imagine smaller than quanta breaking the loop, like the low energy quantum experiments where they twist light to make a much smaller bubble of subquantum size, that may help us in physics.

 If we assume the quanta are not absolute and that all the rockets may not be the same, this might be a way out of the loop. There are torpedos that go at 4 times the speed of most torpedos, this is achieved by smoothing the field by moving some of the flow of exhaust ahead of the machine, this forms a more fluid air zone around it that is so smooth, the "impossible" wave has better flow. The limits of relativity might also be a mirage, one of only inefficiency of machines so far.

  In GWD the fractional charges of the strong force are lighter than light so by F=ma not Emc2 they may spin at that much faster than light. The charges average out to about e.g. 1/3+ 2/3+ 1/2 or 9/6 so the inverse speed would be about 1.3 times c, a generally close agreement with Stephen Chou's shelftop experiments.

 Here's a way we might prove or disprove GWD in this respect;

 If you know physics well you know the noncommunication limit of the Bell Theorem seems to fit SR, and other tricks like the superluminal scissors fail the FTL method because though you can change the group phase and other phases, you can't change the information signal.

 The difference between propulsion methods like rockets and more advanced machines in the IP are about what seems to be what distinguishes SR from GWD. SR involves light and what is seen from a distance, light controlled no doubt by the quanta, even so what we feel seems always more real than the vain visions of looks, the religions of the world tell us so. When there was the evidence in for SR one math genius stubbed his foot on the ground, and said, "I refute it thus!" I believe what I feel more than what I see because there's more work done from inside than control from outside, we don't have others eat or exercise for us, or the rich might!

 Machines are being devised called momentum transfer,and  allow e.g. going to a distant zone like Mars or Jupiter in weeks not days by sending up a "weight" that is caught by the vehicle, then "thrown" in turn to create a reaction force, that's of higher efficiency because what is felt is of higher power than the low energy field. Another good kind of momentum transfer machine in IP are super computers that uses small levers that are higher speed than any other computer, and are not knocked out by electric shock pulses and that are of real efficiency because unlike quanta they don't have all the friction going in and out of the ons and offs, these are some typical advantages of momentum transfer, and indeed, molecular flywheels may store higher power and convert mass to energy at higher efficiency than chemical methods.

 If the water and torpedo are in balance I propose that we make a small torpedo and experiment with ways of improving both the efficiency of flow like the air torpedo and also the momentum transfer method. This would be how the fractional charges of QCD could be faster than light, they have reduced friction because they're lighter than light, and there is more force pushing them as they spin, the force on them is stronger like the rocket's push and so they go fast.

  The machine would be like a linear accelerator, with the small rocket. We know from QED that the matter waves can be shaped by the matter like electrons or protons, to add the "air" around it like the torpedo, we start changing the low energy fields around the small machine. There may be two ways to do this, by changing the general shape of the shock wave with acceleration, like with small strakes or changes in the phase of the waves, much as in airplanes this improves airflow. The other way may be about changes also in the frequency of the shock wave, and so on.

 Here we realize that particle accelerators have never once had a proton or electron move faster than light. They always gain mass at just the relativity rate. But the quanta and the light are in a loop. To make an information wave at FTL you need a wave other than light, and light is the only other wave than gravity that's present in the accelerator, so there is no information signal available at that low energy to send the information at FTL, the accelerator uses relativity to prove relativity. In GWD this isn't a real proof.

 The field is a low energy field like the Mars ship in the IP above, but if we always use a low energy field instead of momentum transfer and ways to also hope to perhaps improve flow as the torpedo the mass (of the ship) and the energy (of the field) may be more nearly the same as in SR and so the loop can't be broken, other than the possible ways of inventing new GWD machines like the rocket and field method. If the wall is the same and the torpedos are the same, the resistance of the wall of the wave will always seem to take infinite force to go past a certain speed but this may only be if we assume the quanta and thus the waves are unchangable. By building improved machines I believe, as with the strong force we may.

 In GWD gravity is a "machine" that maintains its own motion being an acceleration; being lighter than light  F=ma (lower density, higher speed) it may have enough reduced friction it has it's own flow and force much the same, the same as a superfluid flowing from cold to hot. In GWD gravity may break the SR loop by fluidity more than force.

 As I say above, using field modulation experiments around the small machine may help it travel in violation of SR as with reduced mass augment via the "air" around the small machine being improved like the torpedo, and also I believe we might combine this with momentum transfer. Remember FTL spin of the fractional charges in QCD is caused in GWD both by the reduced friction and smoothing of the field but also by the greater force inside the baryon or meson like the exhaust of the rocket. Even so because of the equivalence of mass and energy, the loop may enough that there needs to be enough of both in special events like this of both high energy and mass density, e.g. how the fifth and sixth force inside supermassive fields could do this.

 Note that these events are "hidden" from relativity, the SR loop only applies to the outside of heavy particles mostly, In GWD the external charges only add up to 1 -1 or zero, unifying to relativity.  The hiddeness would be how and why there are combinations of the fractional charges possible e.g. with net fractional charge never seen, these would violate SR at low energy and this would be the cause of confinement not a nonintuitave force that gets stronger with distance, which wouldn't radiate out in three dimentions. By geometry there isn't more room inside a mass than outside.

 To add momentum transfer we might use something like a rail and use small kick machines, none at FTL like as the superluminal scissors yet like the sign of your name in lights by Pearl Vision each in it's own real might boost the speed in violation of SR. Another method of momentum transfer might be to use some sort of propulsion system inside the machine. The machine is small because as mass and energy aren't equal in GWD a small mass has more energy not the same so it's high speed with more force applied, not the heavy mass. If a big mass was used a much more expensive machine would have to be built.

 Here's My GWD General Wave Dynamics Synopsis

About el Nino, and the Possibility of Weather Control

 El Nino is believed to involve two currents both flowing to meet at the equator, then West; the N current to the South is the Panama current, the S to N current is the Peru, or Humboldt current. Changes here seem to often control the weather worldwide. This seems logical because a large ocean like the Pacific is a vast heat sink. The water is considered like an incompressible solid by physicists, this is why your water pipes squeak sometimes. Large changes in ocean flow move huge amounts of heat, like a sort of high speed Continental drift, as far as the heat goes. The pacific is special because it has so much heat stored and it can create larger changes in weather. The Pacific is extreme depth off the W of SA and the Peru current rises up carrying lots of nutrients for life, more abundant than any where else in the world (the rain forest has the most species followed by Australia's Great Barrier Reef; Hawaii has the most birds, even so for numbers of fish, algae, and so on, the Peru current has most.). About once in 10 years the Panama current with warm water moves S to N Chile and a worldwide change in weather. Usually Chile is quite dry but when the moisture reaches the land, this causes lots of floods (not in lots of realtors if they sell ocean views in Ohio!) with the sudden change from hot and dry to to cool and moist multiplying up the change.

Off the West coast of SA is where all forces, N and S and the E and W seem to balance. While the water and wind both move slowly W at the equator, the water of the Panama and Peru currents also are moving against the W coast of SA and the US, that is, there is an E pressure that holds them to the coast, obviously there is a force holding them to the coast, pulling the wheel of the currents involves a force to the E or they would move East also, and the force is large because of the heat stored of the pacific.  
If we think of the Panama and Humboldt current as a balance of forces, this also may multiply up the change. So it's possible relatively small changes may multiply up to control larger weather worldwide.

 Bill Gates is hoping to develop a method of control of triumphant tropical storms by using coolling ships to hope to change the heat flow, after all in WW II there were two allied ships used just to make ice cream, and 50 or so fizz plants in Oceania. Awesome storms they don't just give numbers to here like in the E; here we name them names in the W...

They are heat bubbles that rise from S to N, cooling the tropics about 30 degrees and cleansing  them (a clean name!) with each storm. Changes in heat may thus be used to possibly control the path of the storms.

 Other patents than Microsoft involve using cooling jets of water from a ship moved to inside the eye to try to side steer the storm. If it's balanced by strong forces perhaps just small changes will help steer the storm. As I say on my page about hurricane control we might use dust we might use dust to change hurricanes or even icebergs since both may change the path to control them better.

Click Here for more.
 I think el ninos perhaps might be restored by cooling ships to cut off the S of the Panama current, large fans on the ships might also be used to control the air currents involved. It's also possible that also eg. in times of drought with el ninos or la ninas might be achieved by using more heat to move the Panama current S. Adding dust or even ice (no moist not dry ice!) from Antarctica might also be of worth here. El ninos seem natural compared to earlier weather some us remember in the old wave 20th century, I believe perhaps this is caused by increased solar heat (the sunspots have been at an all time high) and more dust, not greenhouse gasses. If global warming is alone the cause, why are we so often so cold in winter? More dust from agriculture could often carry 'cooler heat' even if the overall temperature is rising to power the more unpredictable changes in weather as I say here.

  About global warming, el ninos may only be powered by changes in overall heat, so if the sun cools eventually as usually it has, el ninos being 'unnatural' may stop. If the Panama and Humboldt currents are once more in balance I think we might then be able to more gradually control el nino by gradually changing the balance of these events with our machines, control of world weather with much smaller changes because the changes on both sides might not be so extreme.

 A related idea that has been offered up may be to use large fins in arrays in hopes of moving the jet stream N say the W US in winter where the forces are most in balance about halfway N and halfway S, thus moving heat to the N for warm winters. The jet stream might also be stabilized by heating beams like masers to make the heat rise or stay that far N. If the jet stream rises in one area it tends to sink elsewhere, so the average is mostly constant. If it rises over land so it's believed we might hope to make it sink over water, say the Atlantic and Pacific, or even stabilize it with machines so it's sort of a larger standing wave in winter or summer; winter more N over the land more by machines, summer up over the oceans +S over land in hopes of good weather.

  It's been seen that the jet stream stream has 600x the power now available, so machines are being built that take off like a helicopter, and then find the wind for power up there via the helicopters at altitude with tethers or beams sending the power our way and so on so.

  Large fins to the W of the US where the US starts to rise over land via heat where the wave is at half the latitude (not humidity 100% and sunshine if it's what put our zone on the weather map!) and thus where the forces were most in balance might be where to get the most out of the fins. Fins would no doubt be moved N or S as the seasons change, so perhaps heating or cooling beams may be best.

 Even so, fins being a sort of momentum transfer system might have value still, just as mechanical computers with small levers may be extreme if faster and more efficient than other computers, and momentum transfer may make travel to mars in just a few weeks possible by throwing a weight up to the ship and the ship then throws it in return much boosting speed.

 Actually hitching a ride on a comet to go to mars much faster and cheaper as some have proposed is a form of momentum transfer.

 Fins and fans would use convection and conduction not just radiation to move the jets, though heating methods on board the arrays powered by fans might be of higher efficiency yet, as with el nino and control of tropical storms, the method here is to try to use a small change by our machines to try to control a larger system, in hopes of that weather control is not always unfeasable because of the huge size of other machines needed. The idea is that some of the time the systems are in enough balance, so we might be able to change the flow here in hopes of more control. My brother an agriculture pro like Sir issac's father wanted him to be before he won the fight at 16 that motivated him in high school, says, great warmer cozy winters, the canadians may celebrate.
 You may ask what about all the global warming? If this is caused by the sun mostly, it may be natural mostly. As I say on my general weather control page, Best Seller link list at left of page, the ecology is adapting to the global warming well. Birds have by evolution ways already to adapt to global warming, like the 64 million years of mild weather since the time of the dinosaurs. The interglacial ages had lots of global warming without problems like methane overheating some fear, they were much warmer than now. The last glacial age was just 75,000 years, not 100,000 years or more, this may tell us we are just at the end of the glacial age and entering a much more common time like most of the cenozoic, recent time since the demise of the dinosaurs. The shorter age may mean the sun is warming as I say on my main Weather Control Site by way of changes in Jupiter's magnetic field, caused in turn by the fizzelling away of the Great Red Spot.

If the number of advanced civilizations is perhaps high, why aren't all the galaxies lit up with the light of these civilizations? Some say the time of outward radiance might be limited by the same tech we use of lower energy connects like WiFi and wires that no longer emit radiation (I Luv Lucy always will be zooming her shows at the speed of light orange radiance waves out to others who may say, Rise and shine on other worlds, just like here, yet more! "Did you make this up"?) Even so about the light from worlds with advanced machines, like 257 million stations, just as lots of pollution is emitted by chemical synthesis, ect. I find it hard to believe that advanced civilizations wouldn't have light pollution. Extra energy is needed for an advanced society to be advanced and light is not so expensive, It's just light. Strike a match, and you have much. Accidental leaks would be common. At any rate many advanced civilizations might leak light as part of common business of life.

 On the other hand I believe as Carl Sagan said that advanced civilizations might have a way to conceal themselves from us. I think this is possible by way of Einstein's EPR, "the spooky action at a distance". There is evidence for the EPR, and I believe it may be because the lower energy fields being a bit lighter than light may have a phase change, or ect. and go faster than light. It's lighter than light so may move faster than light. This is my hoped for Generalization of Maxwell's Method.

  I believe if we take an initial low amplitude source of the waves and then focus them on the distant realm where we or others might hope to smooth the light, we might be able to render it less obvious to outside sensors. Note that the light would be lower energy than the phase change from emission to the light zone we hope to edit, thus travelling faster than light for most of it's travel, catching up with the light at higher speed. Only when the zone where the waves are focused is reached would the "virtual" light be real, as in a laser light at a concert. If the musician at a heavy metal show says, what's making all the noise in here! One problem with using this method might be that the others might also find the high speed waves too, but then so could we, and use this also to find them.

I believe in the EPR enough to consider this, at least till more experiments are done to completely prove or disprove Einstein's idea.There are new experiments being engineered to find out. Even so it may not be possible, in which case, we may indeed find lights of advanced civilizations without them all being with too many editors, no crosswords, all shall be well!

So too even though I believe even if faster than light starship travel may be possible, it may never be economical. To move a lighter mass like a wave faster may be much easier than a massive starship, because of no phase change. The mass augment of SR seems to come from friction, more speed, more resistance, more mass. Einstein believed not that faster than light was impossible, just that only waves or masses already moving at  FTL could move at that speed. I would think he believed in the EPR because he realized intuitively that the EPR is lighter than light so it might be FTL. If friction slows a massive starship, this may be much tougher to untangle from the field, and so it would have a high cost to an advanced civilization to colonize other planets, perhaps too high to be viable. Faster than light for some mass doesn't mean it will be cheap for all. Even so I've believed like others that we might be able to smooth these field interactions, in essence reducing friction by using part of the wave like some torpedoes go much faster by pumping exhaust to the nose and this smooths out the wave so the machine is faster, yet it still may not be either or or only moderately cheap.

There are those who calculate that it would take a telescope millions of times larger than the Hubble to see the lights of the cities of advanced civilizations. For lower energy radiation like microwaves, I had proposed using using either Jupiter's field which bends the waves around or magnetic bubbles (filled with gas to bend the waves; magnetic fields alone don't bend the waves).
Even so light is "heavier", and not so easy to bend.


HOW TO FIND THE LIGHTS OF DISTANT SHORES

 I propose we send out beams of light in a great wheel of the light ray that forms the sensor of the telescope. Like a laser, these are set up in their rest frame as standing waves. By using two slightly overlapping waves, the waves are balanced so they have internal cohesive tension.The tension acts to multiply up the incoming light's effect on that point of the ray. It could be tuned in frequency to refract light the right amount to the sensor. Light at high energy behaves like a heavy particle so one or more a standing waves would be like a lense of considerable density. The telescope observes the ray as it sweeps out 360 degrees at a suitable distance, and the ray's increased sensitivity observes the distant star, planet, or other lights. This could make huge cheap telescopes possible.

I believe advanced civilizations are rare for three reasons; rarer than some have believed.

Overcrowding caused by over hunting of evolution's innocence, causing increased competition for decreasing resources, causing stress and unnatural illness also, reducing the civilization. After all, competition and resources are at the foundation of territory. History shows that people who lose their land are gone in history. Click Here  for Complete Page. I think this may be the main problem most advanced civilizations may face. Competition and Resources are simple. On the link I list ways we might reduce the overcrowding gradually without so much grief.

Second, new research shows that giant gravity at the center of each galaxy makes only a zone about halfway out where life has time to evolve.Too far in too much radiation for life. Too far out no stars forming by the radiation and plasma ect. This means there is a smaller zone in each galaxy where life or advanced civilizations can exist. A reduced zone means perhaps 2/3 reduction in advanced civilizations too.

Third, It's believed the moon was captured. With no moon, no tides and less volcanoes, so less water. Most life lives today within five miles of the ocean. 99% of the fish are 5 miles from the shore tho most not inland 5 miles or land fish, saying, "All ashore that's going ashore!". 3/4 of the people are by the shore. Life is believed to have started in estuaries with the tide sloshing in and out like a computer. With no moon, there would be less lava so less steam via the moon's influence on volcanoes. (2/3 not 1/3 of volcanoes are within the first 10 days of of the month, more earthquakes too are in spring and fall, when tides are higher, and so on.) Less water and less water and nutrients sloshing in and out of tidal pools computing cycle after cycle to form life. Less life, fewer advanced civilizations. The moon may have also brought the world out of ice ages in ways not found  on other worlds by not allowing it to form large ice caps and not tilt over permanently, at least if the Earth like future advanced world already has enough spin to right itself by way of the moons spin. The moon is unusually large (1/81 the earth's mass) and so these worlds with just a bit less spin than enough even if with the unlikely moon capture would become tidally locked. Tidally locked worlds are known, and some are so hot on one side the rocks melt then condense on the other side, literally raining molten rocks if there were weather reports on these worlds.

I believe it would be improbable to have a moon so large compared to Earth, unlike other "families of planets in the solar system"click here for why.

3d  PRINTERS AND THE ECONOMY

  3d printers some say may print all there is perhaps including baked goods, houses (a pixel is a brick filled with foam), even recycling the ink and virus printers. You read of Tim Berners Lee inventor of the internet on Christmas day 1990, he had one web page and one machine, and what  to link was his woe. He always said the internet should be in reach of all machines, and above all at no cost. More recently Lee promotes this cost for sites such as Facebook that he holds are walled off zones that can't be copied to the other reams. He believes these sites if too substantial would threaten the worth of the web for all. This seems like a fab Beatles house printout, like the web was first imagined by Edison, No not automatic writing like Houdini, rather Winston Churchill's same portent of the internet in the 1940's.  Lee ignores the publishing and information business, 50% of the economy. You may think of music as big about copyright, but this is only 5% of the information work like software, financial advisors who forecast weather as well as a doctor who forecasts the weather! There is some money in streaming it seems while the publishing industry is or may be in ruins due to the web, though methods like the ISP tax could help..actually authors are now hoping to unite with codes so they will still be paid by new methods unfounded a few years ago. What did Nabster Nab.

 Copyright is the basic level of IP, trademark is the middle level and patent is the higher level of activity here.. If the web has dissolved copyright already, imagine a world with no inventors being paid, where no one is rich, there are no stores, the economy is of just a much fewer number of products, most of them ink or durable goods, like manufacturing burgers, where mining, service industries and food processing may be the least affected yet though we have all the goods we want cheap since anyone can print out a lamp or hot dish top, there may be even fewer good jobs than now with the internet because people won't go to the store to buy stuff when they can just print it out. Cars or trains couldn't be so easily printed out, though the price from a reliable source to ensure safety and quality could still be rather high. I go to the store and see the value of VISAs and a millionare just looks at the prices. I think like the rich I know so much! We imagine there is a positive side of this, you go in the store left and many of your buys are much cheaper.

Even so with 3d printers we may have all we want of some things and they are cheap, but with less jobs most people would have less money to buy food or pay charities doctors or the police. President Truman would say that most people are energised by the creative people, and without them it would be less enriching. He would say the other people owe their livelyhood to them."

Some say they wouldn't even be willing to pay a 5$ ISP tax in the respect to the 50% of the economy in information work already involved with this and this seems like energising stimulants work, they seem to give energy by stressing one part of the system to give energy to another. Even so there tends to be burnout for most in the general sense for most stimulants other than more natural ones.


 Solutions

Lee mentions Facebook with woe and like a musical coffin they charge 20 to find out if comfortable (and as if for relaxation!). He says it's restricting information yet this sounds like the pre BC Before Computer publishing. Access was limited to information and only in reach for a fee via booksellers, at least for new books or RN Weather Maps. This didn't stop the world from sound 45 rpm sounds making musicians feel of worth.

 If you are a web author why not consider making your site  with paid access just as Lee has warts about. The more authoors aren't cheaping out, the more often all will be paid. I'm considering this at least partially, even if no one reads my sites at least I would be helping save the economy! Think of me too, thanks...


 Second, the ISP tax may be better. More people could be rich so more wealth for all. One important thing saving IP or inventors rights would allow is a way out of poverty for people who were smart and poor, say Einstein Twain or Edison. He knows the worth of bread who hasn't had enough to eat. It's a higher nature for the poor to get richer, for millions of years they were, or evolution would have stopped. It's been seen that in the US there are all kinds of people crossing from poverty to wealth each month, and this seems as it should be.

 Also more and more authors can sign up for sites like Amazon Create space that pay well at no cost to the author. (With Create space, more than just words are allowed, and the author doesn't have to author an entire book, allowing more authors than many ebook businesses). If enough authors sign up, supply goes down, and prices paid will again be like after the late 1700's, when the business of authors arrived. (Shakespeare and none of the ancients ever made a living as authors.)

And for the 3d printers a more elaborate way may be used to essentially not treat inventors like third world economies, or stores out of business and the bad economy. There are now patents on machines that jolt heavy particles like in the atom to hopefully create matter waves, known to exist by Einstein's relativity and "recently proven" by measuring pulsar's rate of decelleration as the radiance is radiant. We know how strong a shock will create the radiation and that they are in this range. What this may make is a really good sensor. As in to find out where all the printers are and what's been printed.

 I envisioned a use of other radar sensors like ones in use the size of a light that sense the heartbeat and breathing on the other side of a wall even a three foot concrete wall to document who was there by the unique way we breathe and our special heart health, sort of like a voice print or UPS signup where your x is the only one like it in the box or outside the box. In Mexico the painters pay taxes by selling their pictures at auction and in Norway they sign the paint with their fingerprint so no forgeries, complex fingerprints like Ben Franklin's leaf copies on each bill unlike others have power to foil bogus cash, In Gutenberg he trusted .

 The radar if used like on UAV's (drones) is good but it would be jammed by metal so while we would be able to find say who's in good health or has had a heart attack, great for ER visits, the best use would be limited since the bad people would just buy shielding like aluminum foil for the walls.

  Since the gravity wave sensors just use heavy particles and they would fit on a UAV, this might make a good surveillance device in general. Since gravity doesn't shield it would be useful for census and solving murders and for freeing the 50,000 servants who "Reader's Digest believes" are being held in the US in households e.g to do forced labor for the owner. Experts say there's little hope they would be saved and using this type of drones might save them.

  About the printers and copyright these and the stuff they print could be sensed by the drones. All printers if found to be in error would have chips to stop them by Wifi connection and so on. This reminds me of Orrin Hatch, senior congressman also a songwriter who actually sells about 100,000$ worth of song rights a year for his songs. Hatch hoped to pass laws so if anyone downloaded a song wrong from say ITunes, their PC would be stopped by distant explosion of the machine. Since gravity waves don't reflect the best way to sense say who is in a house might be to use a signal on the ground sent to the drone that is over the horizon yet in a line between the machines.

You might say gravity is real weak, so it wouldn't give high enough resolution. I believe gravity may whiz between heavier mass in the room between them mostly, thus not stopping much essentially because of the conservation laws. CLICK HERE Even so gravity can't implode infinitely because it would be infinite, and the heavier fields interact with the field even if field exclusion would be the cause of disproof of gravity, e.g. by the "antigravity" of electromagnetism lifting us up inside to stop the gravity from downward force. Thus there are two forces as usual, the gravity, and the electromagnetism of each mass, and a zone between them where they are in balanced. Gravity has power to push us down in the sofa, so I believe each zone of field has gravity as strong as the heavier field, the zone outside each atom and so on. This means even if the IP machines use gravity, it may have high enough resolution to find more than a blob.


 If the printerbots won, our world would be more like a third world economy. This would reduce the money of countries like the chinese importers, and if we try to make our economy "artificially elevated" to hold on to our wealth there would be much temptation for unlawful outside business. This would be inside the economy and also from outside also. Only by a real good method of sensing what is where and a reliable way to stop the counterfeiters of shelves, walls and labor stations is this possible. I had believed this like the problem with Orin Hatch's solution would be limited by the unfeasibility of all the legal costs of enforcing the rules still saving IP and the economy. The main cost for the printers would be in finding where they are, what they've printed and sensing if they have the chip. If cheap reliable sensors and a way to enforce the IP laws were available here, the main costs would be reduced and more.. A false 911 alarm costs municipalities 350$. 

INFLATION COSMOLOGY And The WILKINSEN WMAP OBSERVATIONS


   It's believed the Wilkensen Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) which show the cleanest
map yet of the cosmic microwave background or CMB, may imply Guth's cosmic inflation was the start of a chain reaction of other bubble universes. See this page for more about Guth's idea. WMAP shows a round simple cosmic circle with regular "sides" of the cosmos, Click here for image. Tufts University astronomer Alex Vilenken believes in this, and NYU researchers Spencer Chang, Thomas Levi, and Matthew Kleban say "If the two bubble universes impacted, the impact zone would be in the shape of a circle, and the pulse of energy from this circular zone would travel into our bubble like a shock wave, where it would presumably leave a disk like imprint on the microwave background". Kleban predicted that the light may be polarized in special angles in two concentric rings of the disk.

  My belief is another view of both cosmology and cosmogony, I've named Cosmic Jet Cosmology, or CJC. I use more familiar physics seen in astronomy of the jets that are of stars and more massive bodies the highest energy seen of any masses of the universe. In this cosmology, it may be of related high energy events. The observed Hubble radiant outward travel of the galaxies might be mostly inside one of the jets, where we are, the other perhaps yet too distant to see. In CJC the jets then move out to the cosmic equator which would also explain this feature found by WMAP, though not by Kleban's explanation. Bubbles would be radiant and spherical, spin would involve a zone like this band of galaxies, not bubbles. In CJC the jets from the source of radiance like the galaxies while scaled up more in higher power, could then spill over to the plane of the cosmos, the cosmic equator then might implode the matter back from the plane to the center of the jets where it's recycled by the gravity to reradiate via the jets in infinite cycles of radiance and implosion conserving energy and powered by gravity.

  The Sloan sky survey seems to show that more galaxies are spinning counterclockwise in the N hemisphere than they would by inflation cosmology. The S hemisphere survey is in progress to see if it is also with clockwise spins of the galaxies. As on this page it seems anamalous the Milky Way is spinning with spin axis highly aligned with the direction of the cosmic expansion seen. This seems to be definite evidence against a completely smooth era of inflation expansion as in Guth's cosmology.


OTHER OBJECTIONS TO GUTH'S INFLATION COSMOLOGY

  Inflation Expansion cosmology was the most published idea in cosmology by researchers in the early 1980's. However, CJ Cosmology may be better to explain the cosmos, since in CJ Cosmology energy is conserved via recycling of the energy jets to plane and rewinding up via gravity, and a simple spherical Big Bang created out of nothing would violate energy conservation.  Another problem with Inflation Expansion that CJC allows more solution for is about the short period of hyperinflation that Guth used to explain the general smoothness of the microwave radiation (except for the lower energy fossil found by WMAP. And perhaps the possible spin of the cosmos.) What caused the hyperinflation and why it stopped are neither explained in Inflation Cosmology. There are no known physics involved, and this is completely to be accepted on faith in Inflation Cosmology. Where ultimate cosmology is from we may say. These two problems of inflation expansion have not been much considered.
 
 In CJ Cosmology the cause of the general smoothness is only that the slow speed of light via electromagnetism can't connect up the galaxies at great distances and only the weaker force of gravity being faster than light could connect even inside the jet. Indeed I use the regularity of the sides and central zone as evidence that gravity being lighter than light may be faster than light. Only the weaker force of gravity being faster than light could connect inside the jets. My hopeful generalization of Maxwell's idea that was forgotten with the goings on of Relativity is the method he used to predict the speed of light exactly based on the resilience (density) of the field. If gravity is lighter than light it may move faster than light, you lighten up to travel faster. The question here I would still ask is "how did Maxwell do this" hardly a coincidence it seems.. Though my explanation I call General Wave Dynamics, may not be as dramatic as relativity, it's possible GWD may give us new science like in astronomy, high speed communications, or finding advanced civilizations faster, or computers, and how gravity works, by finding the deeper truth. Here's my GWD synopsis or see the link upper left of the page. In CJ Cosmology and GWD gravity is lower energy and longer acting, and thus the microwaves are smoother than by relativity. If gravity is at the speed of light, thermodynamic entropy like via the speed of light wouldn't hold the cosmos together..


 If the fields are in a continuous loop of eternal motion powered by gravity like the world would spin if left in the cosmos as a system, there might be a more electromagnetic cause of expansion and radiance too as I say on my site about Cosmic Jet Cosmology . As in the huge magnetic fields found between the galaxies, and perhaps the Cosmic jets being of ionized charge would attract the plane of the cosmos, causing cosmic acceleration, also unexplained in Kleban's view or Inflation Expansion, and so on. CJ Cosmology saves energy conservation and the same mechanism causing the jets of galaxies might be used to solve the Hubble radiance that vexed Einstein and caused him to invent the Einstein cosmological constant. To me Einstein seems to have believed in a deeper truth in cosmology.


 The WMAP would be explained as looking at the center of the cosmic jet on our side as in the same general result as bubble cosmology. CJC predicts a related mirrorlike image seen on the other side, looking inward to the center of the cosmos. Here we might see another low energy image with the same central zone except to a different degree since it's in expansion too, though not at the higher rate of speed of the outer cosmic radiance.

 I have three scenarios for bubble impacts if Guth is correct;

 Either a bubbble might impact and continue in, leaving a lot of matter to find yet this hasn't been seen just the much lower energy WMAP.


Or it could could bounce off and leave even more energy, also "off the WMAP".


Thus it might be stationary relative to our universe with a standing wave.


  The problem with all there is here is about the simplicity of the central circle and sides, especially in the third situation, which may seem most probable. An impact would seem to have more complex waves and ripples that wash around the outside of the bubbles, not just two, especially if it's a standing wave. In CJ Cosmology I imagine it's possible the cosmic belt zone seen by WMAP implies cosmic spin, and this would imply torque forces and more complexity of the ripples seen, yet the data so far shows simplicity. You might say, comic cosmology rules. Hyperinflation allows a simple wave seen since the bubble expansion smooths out the geometry. CJ Cosmology makes the same general prediction since the shear forces of the jet would explain the simplicity of the waves seen too. The "sides" as in the image are not a disk and can't be explained by the impact of the bubbles.. I think they may be caused by the red shift of the field flowing more in our line of site, as the jet flows more sideways above us since we aren't in the center, the displacement of the light would reduce the temperature we see. While the jet is regular, it's not symmetrical all around as the bubble would have. CJ Cosmology makes other predictions the bubbles won't and may also solve the problem of when the cosmos was created. If eternal, it seems more creative..

  By F=ma, not the less general Emc2, the motion of smaller bodies around galaxies might be used to map the force between galaxies. Emc2 says there is more mass of a heavy body, and more energy. So when the same force is applied to a heavy and a light mass they should both move at the same speed, heavy and light are equal in Relativity. Mass doesn't enter into the equation of fall in the Earth's field, so Einstein believed it was space itself that controls gravity, either the mass or the earth is in equivalent motion, it doesn't matter which.

  If there is a magnetic force powering the cosmic expansion or even acceleration, it will act on charged galaxies and lighter masses in different ways in GWD for the lower energy fields. A lighter galaxy will move a bit faster with the radiance outward, one with more charge yet faster, and a heavy light galaxy with no charge will have the most inertia and so move in the most linear way all else held the same. These three components may help map out the force powering the cosmic radiance.

 Impacting bubbles in time imply complexity as in ripples. No ripples are yet seen though they should have been by impacting bubbles. Also the asymmetrical spin of galaxies is relatively complex, and moderate complexity is involved in CJ Cosmology too because of spin not completely via the stretching of the world lines of the linear motion reducing angular motion though not completely nearby us in the jet on our side. Einstein's idea has more complexity via stability over time, (and a simple radiance and expansion being in balance so no round zone as in the image so Einstein's cosmology in a simple form seems disproven) and so do impacting bubbles via the ripples. Impacting bubbles imply more complexity if the resonant fossil wave has had plenty of time to resonate and vibrate. A constant of expansion plus some angular momentem nearer us has moderate complexity as observed, as in the sheets of galaxies, the Great Wall, and so on. In general in CJ Cosmology there are the jets, the one jet near us that would the cause of the symmetrical round zone seen, and the more distant asymmetry of the cosmic equator, to balance the expansion and then conserve energy by the inward motion of the disc. Any spin of galaxies implies disproof of Inflation Cosmology, and a slower radiance would be found with finite jets. The spins of the galaxies imply the radiance like in a jet is assymetrical, and by no means perfectly smooth as in inflation cosmology.



The spin of the cosmos nearby might be much smaller than a method like Einstein used to explain how we haven't imploded to the center. If the universe is balanced both in and out, where's all the spin? In general there is spin at the cosmic disc in CJ Cosmology, and this is distant. A jet near us would be via linear travel as we radiate out to reach the cosmic plane and it would have just some spin, though not a lot. Inflation cosmology predicts no spin, Einstein's idea predicts lots of spin, and CJ Cosmology predicts just some spin as observed, and because we may be at the center of the jet, CJC predicts the spin axis is parallel to our travel outward.


OTHER PREDICTIONS, THOUGH NOT MORE OF ALL THERE IS! Of COSMIC JET COSMOLOGY