Why doesn't Gravity or the Collapse of the Wave Function Control Time as Much as Einstein Believed?
Einstein's ideas about time seem to have been convergent. One of Einstein's ideas I think of as more unusual was his claim that we're accelerating upwards through time on the surface of the Earth.
This may have been what led him to make the prediction that old electrons have more energy than new electrons, but they don't. The field flows through mass at the surface of the Earth and if gravity is acceleration in equivalent motion, it would seem as we or electrons accelerate, they would put on weight and change energy.
Yet if we were accelerating upward at a comfortable speed of 32 feet per second we would be at the speed of light in less than a year and we would have gained infinite relativistic mass by this acceleration. And gravity accelerates inward and time seems to radiate out by entropy as I'll say.
Many physicists have agreed with Einstein's other idea about how the collapse of the wave function may control time basically by the same method as Quantum Computing except it's computing about time itself by selecting out futures.
Discussions about the collapse of the wave function or the Many Worlds hypothesis or even Feyman's idea of time reversal being a possible event in subatomic physics have been considered. (Time reversal as it turns out isn't actually a property of subatomic particles.)
And others have asked "Where is there a definite past present and future in all these quantum events?"
Here I will show you where the past present and future are in the system and while even if the collapse of the wave function and gravity are part of what we find time to be, there are some simple reasons to believe time is not mostly convergent either as with the collapse of the wave function or gravity.
Unlike the physics of space we can't reverse our motion through time. We're stuck in the present. To me this seems to be evidence Relativity is incomplete if space and time are unified.
It's been said we could "no more believe time flows any more than we would say length extends". But if we look at all the world around us on the surface of the Earth we see all kinds of motion of the molecules and atoms around us in fluid flow.
Time as has been well known in higher physics is proportional to the frequency of a system, so we may say it has something important to do about the spin of the quanta.
This could be where Feynman's time reversal would be derived from, because at short range the spins match up like small clocks, even while at longer range they don't connect up exactly, and time would indeed be more like the flow of fluid.
But the spin is angular. Motion through more empty space tends to be linear and a line if it's not linear has acceleration, so time and space tend to be the opposite of each other and not unified as much as Einstein thought because for example if they were unified and if you move backwards through space you'll be moving backwards through time. So if we say space and time are not the same, or are perhaps even the opposite, this is the explanation about why time flows but length doesn't extend.
Hawking was of the point of view for a while we could actually influence the past from the present And many considered this claim by him to be wrong. The reason would be because of what I consider to be the essence of where the future the past and the present are derived from.
Yes, gravity and the collapse of the wave function have considerable influence over what happens about time near the surface of the Earth. Even so (because it's not as knowable in the sense that we can't know the weather report 15 days distant as well as we know from 10 days away) the future is mostly radiating outward by the thermodynamic radiation of energy. Some Like Laura Knight Jadzek have claimed also we could be even be getting "messages from us in the future", Either of these type of claims about being able to influence the past or the future from the present seem highly counterintuitive at best because the past doesn't exist anymore (except for the records) and the future neither has a record or exists yet.
Einstein's belief that we are being influenced by the flow of the gravitational field through us by the evidence about relativity by the Mossbauer effect I think is not the main cause of time because of my theory or at any rate not completely controlling time with thermodynamic entropy controlling a more major slice.
Gravity does indeed change the flow of time on the outside of bodies made of atoms or molecules around a massive body as we see by the slowing of clocks like atomic clocks in experiments but gravity is convergent and time tends to radiate out more. Gravity doesn't reverse every single particle like we would need for true reversal of time, instead gravity just sees a couch or train as a blob.
As I say elsewhere my idea is that gravity actually wraps around the outside of the heavy quanta by what I call Line Removal, like paramagnetism for gravity so it doesn't have shielding or quantum numbers or super high energy at near radius and its controlled by each of the quantas spin generating the acceleration of gravity because they are indeed the source of gravity.
Even so gravity changes more the look of time, and the internal changes inside the quanta are another important way time exists.
It's been said God set the world in motion and the rest of the influence is more indirect. Some physicists say only information at the surface or outside a body is important. But if gravity is outside the world and the quanta, most of the rest of the history of the world-past and future is not about gravity.
In my theory the future is the energy arriving in radiating from the Sun. The present is the computation done both by the collapse of the wave function but also by the thermodynamic energy re-radiating out. The past is what remains of the stored record of the events of the present.
The collapse of the wave function and gravity are also involved but don't have as much influence, and the time we evolved with is mostly about thermodynamic entropy.
The radiating out of time by the events near the surface of a planet like the Earth also means, while we could influence the flow of time for a short distance into the past as Hawking believed, and while the ancient events could influence us in the present, we can't go back and influence the past because the radiation of time is outward and not in reverse.. heat flows from hot to cold.
This seems like what Einstein didn't recognize in his ideas about gravity and the collapse of the wave function which both radiate inward having influence on time.
The future isn't an acceleration as Einstein thought because we're getting this simple linear thermodynamic energy from the sun to power the computations of the atoms and molecules near the surface of the Earth where we are. In my view the future is this energy and it hasn't arrived yet so it can't do computations till then and it's simple so we're not getting messages from the future because there is no life like on the Sun. The future "doesn't exist yet" so like the ancient influences on us we can influence it somewhat yet, it's not a place but no more than a set of possibilities till the energy reaches us. If it's too much month at the end of the money, in this view the cash has more influence!
A big time machine like for the Earth can't be built because other than the residuals we have like from the ancients or ancient DNA we inherited from early events, the past doesn't exist anymore so we would have to build it like piece by piece with like 3d printer with huge energy costs and we would have to have a place to put it.
The future like the energy from the Sun that hasn't reached us yet is about simple physics and it's another sort of time.
If time is about spin of the quanta mostly and a heavy quanta was emitted and maintained its spin for billions of years before it reached a sensor and its spin was then measured, in what sense is this time? Our ideas about time are not of the vast majority of the matter and energy of the universe and we could say there's not as much complexity of time anywhere other than where life could exist.
As I say the present in this view is just the computation of events like the bond angles and the energies of the electrons mostly of the atoms as well as the nuclei, but also the computation of the collapse of the wave function to some extent as Einstein believed. This may not be the main part of what time is about.. it's about the computations of those atoms and molecule's bond angles..
And the past in this view Is the record of the stored events so it happened before it was stored in the present.
Since the past is based on the record of what's left like in the rocks like fossils, and it's in the present as the record, so it's also wearing out, and the computations of the present are also constantly wearing out and running down.
The future like the energy from the Sun that hasn't reached us yet is about simple physics and it's another sort of time.
If time is about spin of the quanta mostly and a heavy quanta was emitted and maintained its spin for billions of years before it reached a sensor and its spin was then measured, in what sense is this time? Our ideas about time are not of the vast majority of the matter and energy of the universe and we could say there's not as much complexity of time anywhere other than where life could exist.
As I say the present in this view is just the computation of events like the bond angles and the energies of the electrons mostly of the atoms as well as the nuclei, but also the computation of the collapse of the wave function to some extent as Einstein believed. This may not be the main part of what time is about.. it's about the computations of those atoms and molecule's bond angles..
And the past in this view Is the record of the stored events so it happened before it was stored in the present.
Since the past is based on the record of what's left like in the rocks like fossils, and it's in the present as the record, so it's also wearing out, and the computations of the present are also constantly wearing out and running down.
It may seem it would always spiral down to simplicity and all the life of the Earth might stop without the heat. But there is the source of the light of the sun that's arriving in from the outside to power this flow of time as we've evolved to experience it.
My belief is Einstein's idea that the collapse of the wave function itself controls time may not be completely untrue.
As I said on my other posts I've tended to believe entanglement events like the EPR make it so when you flip one electron with spin up and the other one always has spin down and vice versa so only those two electrons in all the electrons in the cosmos are connected this way, Einstein's other hope for a low energy quanta to get around the uncertainty principle could have a sort of small constellation of these particles around each heavy quantum.
My belief is Einstein's idea that the collapse of the wave function itself controls time may not be completely untrue.
As I said on my other posts I've tended to believe entanglement events like the EPR make it so when you flip one electron with spin up and the other one always has spin down and vice versa so only those two electrons in all the electrons in the cosmos are connected this way, Einstein's other hope for a low energy quanta to get around the uncertainty principle could have a sort of small constellation of these particles around each heavy quantum.
And by this when you entangle two quanta you're also unifying the code of those special constellations of each quantum and they become one. Einstein didn't know what the low energy particle could be but I had tended to identify it with a quanta I thought had read had been predicted and had been discovered in the lab called the low energy Higgs' But I couldn't refind the reference to it on the web.
So here I tend to replace the low energy Higgs' perhaps with a constellation of the Feynman particles around the quanta so they're fused even if the low energy Higgs turns out not to be viable.
Einstein's idea may be worthwhile because recent "low energy quantum experiments" seem to show he was at least partially correct. They send the quantum "mouse" a quantum past the other like Schrodinger's cat, and by watching how the mouse moves they're able to show the cat is either alive or dead.
This seems to be evidence for Einstein's idea whether it's about the low energy Higgs' or the Feynman particles in either event.
(In this view the reason Einstein's idea is not completely true and how the low energy Quantum experiments only show partial results could be because the Feynman particles only partially act like particles because they're somewhat below the quantum level.)
About this constellation of the low energy events around each heavier quanta this may be of worth to our ideas about time I think.. Having this special constellation around the outside of each quanta could allow each one to store a large amount of information with each event externally that were influenced by the collapse of that wave function.
I believe this could be possible because it's been known since the 1920s, every single neuron of the brain contains all the memory of the entire brain because lab mice had their brain area removed smaller and smaller and they still remember all of the entire memory of their brain.
But the brain has like a quadrillion bits of data so each neuron will have a quadrillion bits too. And according to the Wikipedia proteins are fold much faster and are much more unified than the speed of light physics allow.
But if all neurons were storing data by this code of the constellation of each quanta and by collapsing the wave function to perform the computations just like a quantum computer, evolution would favor this advantage for neurons and other proteins because it would have given a major survival advantage to the life with this advantage of utilizing the collapse of the wave function.. sharing both the storage advantage and a much higher speed computing advantage.
And of course this is in disagreement without Einstein other than his great concern about the speed of the collapse of the wave function!
But if you look at this about how the neuron could store so much data I started to think about my theories of time about the past where the evidence is stored as a record moving forward into the future. This reminds me of like strata and layers on layers to store data. So my guess is if so neurons might have this sort of layering of other layers of the degree of the collapse of the wave function to store more data.
If neurons turn out to store way too much data this may be how. And just as importantly the world itself being made of the same quanta may have the same data storage ability.
So we could imagine by finding out the information of the low energy quanta around the outside of each heavier quanta we could have a super record of the history of the Earth and the past.
Even while this wouldn't allow us to visit the ancient worlds it could be a great way to build a machine, not exactly a time machine but a real simulation machine!
So we could imagine by finding out the information of the low energy quanta around the outside of each heavier quanta we could have a super record of the history of the Earth and the past.
Even while this wouldn't allow us to visit the ancient worlds it could be a great way to build a machine, not exactly a time machine but a real simulation machine!
Masses around us are spinning at different rates and if time is more thermodynamic, it would seem different quanta and different amounts of heat may have different rates of the passage of time and as a result at night atomic clocks might run just a bit slower, an event having little to do with gravity or the collapse of the wave function as Einstein thought.
This might be an average change because the atomic clocks are stuck at one level and might only change the rate of spin if the atoms are moved above each quantum level. Note that different atoms have different levels of sensitivity and this may allow more quantitative evidence for this if it's so.
While it's true atomic clocks once set up tick at the
The outside of each quantum spins at the speed of light so it's quantized, but if all the quanta spun only at the speed of light not just "on the outside" the masses would only be 1, -1 or other quantum numbers of spin. If the mass is spinning energy we can't explain the large number of masses seen in quanta without more spin inside.
Are we to say that heat has no influence on the spin rate of electrons as experiment seems to show? This would seem to violate energy conservation. I find this as improbable as Einstein's belief that gravity changes the energy of electrons. My idea seems superior to his or the idea that quantum spin alone is involved.
My belief is this dark matter component of the proton, (which would give 97% of the mass of the proton otherwise unaccounted for) may spin with a change in tension of the quantum spin, and only shows when enough of the dark matter tension is changed to then cause the change of rate of another atomic clock.
This reminds me of the question of "why does the muon weigh and convert from the electron at just the right energy?"
My explanation is the dark matter component of the electron is already spinning at faster than light with its tension, and then simply changes phase at the right level to create the muon.The dark matter tension is beyond relativity because it's more non quantum and faster than light. If it was spinning at the speed of light inside, like the other quanta, it couldn't have phases of mass like the electron's change to the muon.
I believe we have no acceleration upward through time as Einstein thought because the light is uniform and radiating in at a regular rate.
As I say it would seem we evolved around our ideas about time. Time like water only exists in the fluid phase anywhere in the solar system, as ice water and steam on the surface of the Earth. So too the vast majority of the future energy and in the solar system the energy above us like radiation from the Sun is simpler than the time of our life.
Carl Sagan was saying about life on other worlds, he was a water chauvinist and a carbon chauvinist, And I think we as living beings, because we evolved with the thermodynamic radiation of time are actually time chauvinists!
We can't travel into the past or the future and we're stuck in the present because we exist as life on the limit of our realm on the surface of the Earth.
It's been said you can't run a mill with water that is passed, and while this means we're dependent on the energy of the water or the energy from the Sun this is also the reason why we can't travel through time.
When we climb a mountain we don't notice the change of time by gravity much at all but we're for sure aware of how we feel our sense of the rate of time has changed. We know a lot by the proteins of our neurons but a lot of the outside world is not about proteins or gravity. As I say both the proteins and gravity are about the radiation inward of the fields. But all around us things are wearing out and running down. This is something gravity and the collapse of the wave function don't do (the collapse of the wave function is being researched to make a high capacity super efficient battery).
Studies have shown, obese people actually have a different sense of the rate of time as it passes. If they weigh a lot, gravity might be how!
Some scientists believe the reason we sleep is because it improves the rate of folding of proteins, and evolution couldn't get around this basic event so it's of worth to most life to sleep even while it was dangerous otherwise (by risk of snack attack!) in evolution. But if the proteins are always folding and if time was at the same rate we would be awake or asleep all the time.
All this could be made quantitative by the study of crystals. On my other post I discuss about crystals by multiplying up the size of each collapse of the wave function as a way to measure and prove it actually exists, as well as using them for other uses like room temperature superconductors or super insulators and using the crystals to self-assemble to make larger quantum computers more rapidly.
The crystal computes like a quantum computer and this may help us to quantitatively define how and why the thermodynamic branching out of entropy is what it is because it would basically be the result of the implosion of the light like from the Sun or other radiation inward of the wave functions which then radiate back out as the thermodynamic energy of Entropy. This interaction between the collapse of the wave function would partially be as Einstein thought and the solution for how we could describe how and why the branches of the entropy rereadiance exist which otherwise has been unsolved.